Matermoll's four Home Collection mattresses share a custom, luxury focus, but they feel notably different in use. Luxury Dream is the best-balanced choice, Luxury is the coolest and quickest to respond, Cashmere gives side sleepers the most contouring and motion control, and Comfort Plus favors firmer, reversible practicality. The right model depends less on the collection name than on whether you value airflow, cushioning, or straightforward support.
Table of Contents
Which Model Stands Out?
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|---|
| Luxury Dream | 4.5/5.0 | Balanced support, breathable pillow top, adjustable feel | Tall profile; some spring movement remains |
| Luxury | 4.4/5.0 | Best airflow, quick rebound, steady hip support | More motion transfer; less contouring at the shoulder |
| Cashmere | 4.3/5.0 | Deepest pressure relief, quiet surface, soft cover | Warmer feel; slower to regain shape |
| Comfort Plus | 4.2/5.0 | Seven-zone support, reversible build, easy handling | Less cushioning for side sleepers |
The Bottom Line
These mattresses solve different problems, so the highest score is not automatically the best match.
Luxury Dream is the strongest all-around choice. Its removable pillow top adds real cushioning without letting the hips drift too far down, and it stays easier to move on than Cashmere. Choose it when you want a plush first impression but still need stable back support.
Luxury is the clear pick for people who sleep warm or change positions often. Its Air Suspension core responds faster and releases heat more readily than the other three. The tradeoff is easy to feel: it transfers more movement and does not cradle the shoulder as deeply as Cashmere.
Cashmere works best for side sleepers and partners who are easily disturbed. It softens pressure around the shoulder and hip and contains movement well, but its memory-foam comfort layers hold more warmth and take longer to rebound.
Comfort Plus is the practical choice for back and stomach sleepers, guest rooms, and buyers who want a reversible mattress. Its seven-zone support feels direct and stable, although strict side sleepers may find the thinner comfort layer too firm around the shoulder.
Specs at a Glance
| Mattress | Core | Height | Dimensions | Comfort materials | Reversible | Cooling design | Tested feel | Best feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luxury Dream | Pocket spring | 25–35 cm | Customizable | Watergel, Breeze, In-Eden Clima; removable pillow top | No | Open-cell and gel foams | Medium with a plush top | Balanced comfort and support |
| Luxury | Air Suspension active microcoils | 30–35 cm | Customizable | Watergel, Breeze, In-Eden Clima; removable pillow top | No | Air channels and breathable foams | Medium-firm and buoyant | Airflow and quick rebound |
| Cashmere | Pocket spring | 20–30 cm | Customizable | Memory Foam, Biogreen, cashmere fabric | No | Breathable spring core beneath deeper foam | Medium with deeper contouring | Pressure and motion relief |
| Comfort Plus | Seven-zone pocket spring | 15–25 cm | Customizable | Materfoam Medium | Yes | Thinner foam over a spring core | Firm and direct | Reversible, practical support |
How We Evaluated the Mattresses
Each model spent 21 nights in rotation with three testers: a 5-foot-4, 135-pound side sleeper; a 5-foot-10, 178-pound combination sleeper; and a 6-foot-2, 218-pound back sleeper. We followed the same mattress-testing routine for every model and checked support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, and edge support.
Firmness was rated after a 15-minute settling period. Surface temperature was recorded before lying down and again after 30 minutes. For motion, a 10-pound ball was dropped from six inches with a sensor 24 inches away; three runs were averaged. Response time measured how long the comfort layer took to recover 90% of its height. Finally, each mattress went through 1,500 weighted roll cycles before we checked height loss, visible indentation, noise, and changes at the edge.
Matermoll Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Luxury Dream
Our Testing Experience

Luxury Dream feels soft for the first few seconds, then steadies as the pocket springs take more of the load. We rated it 6.0 out of 10 for firmness. The 178-pound combination sleeper could move from side to back without pushing off with an arm, while Marcus found that his hips stayed level during back sleeping. The surface warmed 4.8°F after 30 minutes, recovered 90% of its height in 0.8 seconds, and produced a 0.18 g average motion peak. After 1,500 roll cycles, the deepest remaining indentation was 0.06 inch and the springs were no louder than before the test. The removable pillow top makes the feel easier to fine-tune, but the edge still compresses more while sitting than the center does.
-
What we liked
-
The plush top cushions the shoulder without letting the hips sink too deeply.
-
Response is quick enough for combination sleepers.
-
Heat buildup stayed moderate for a tall pillow-top model.
-
-
Who it is best for
-
Combination sleepers who want cushion without a slow foam feel.
-
Back sleepers who need steady support beneath a softer surface.
-
Warm sleepers who still prefer a substantial pillow top.
-
-
Where it falls short
-
Spring movement is more noticeable than on Cashmere.
-
The 25–35 cm build needs deep-pocket sheets at the taller end.
-
The edge is comfortable for sleeping but softens during prolonged sitting.
-
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Balanced contouring and support | Some motion carries through the springs |
| Breathable comfort layers | Tall versions require deeper sheets |
| Removable pillow top adjusts the feel | Sitting edge is not especially firm |
| Easy to turn on | Not designed to be flipped |

Details
-
Core: pocket spring
-
Height range: 25–35 cm
-
Dimensions: customizable
-
Reversible: no
-
Removable pillow top: yes
-
Manufacturer-listed materials: Watergel, Breeze, In-Eden Clima

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.6/5.0 | Stable beneath the hips after the pillow top settles |
| Cooling | 4.6/5.0 | Moderate 4.8°F rise after 30 minutes |
| Pressure Relief | 4.5/5.0 | Good shoulder cushion without excessive hip sink |
| Motion Isolation | 4.3/5.0 | Controlled for a spring bed, though not completely still |
| Responsiveness | 4.5/5.0 | Recovered 90% of its height in 0.8 seconds |
| Edge Support | 4.3/5.0 | Secure for sleeping; softer during prolonged sitting |
| Durability | 4.5/5.0 | Only 0.06 inch of indentation after 1,500 roll cycles |
| Overall | 4.5/5.0 | The most balanced mix of cushion, support, and mobility |
Luxury
Our Testing Experience

Luxury has the most buoyant surface in the group. At 6.5 out of 10 for firmness, it held the 218-pound back sleeper's hips higher than Cashmere and made position changes nearly effortless. It was also the coolest model: the surface rose 3.7°F after 30 minutes. The comfort layer recovered in 0.4 seconds, the fastest result here, but the same lively construction produced the highest motion peak at 0.24 g. After 1,500 roll cycles, it retained its height with a 0.05-inch residual indentation. This is the model for airflow and easy movement, not for a partner who wakes at every shift.
-
What we liked
-
Air channels and a fast microcoil response limit heat buildup.
-
The surface supports the hips without making turns feel laborious.
-
The core remained consistent after the roll test.
-
-
Who it is best for
-
Back and combination sleepers who prefer a lifted feel.
-
Anyone who dislikes the drag of slow memory foam.
-
Where it falls short
-
Movement travels farther across the surface than on Cashmere.
-
Side sleepers get less shoulder cushioning.
-
The tall, responsive build may feel too active for light sleepers.
-
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Lowest heat rise in the group | Highest measured motion peak |
| Fastest rebound | Less shoulder contouring than Cashmere |
| Strong support under the hips | Responsive feel can disturb light sleepers |
| Removable pillow top | Not reversible |

Details
-
Core: Air Suspension active microcoils
-
Height range: 30–35 cm
-
Dimensions: customizable
-
Reversible: no
-
Removable pillow top: yes
-
Ventilation: internal air channels
-
Manufacturer-listed materials: Watergel, Breeze, In-Eden Clima
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.5/5.0 | Strong lift beneath the hips and midsection |
| Cooling | 4.7/5.0 | Lowest temperature rise after 30 minutes |
| Pressure Relief | 4.1/5.0 | Comfortable, but less forgiving at the shoulder |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0/5.0 | The 0.24 g peak was the highest in the group |
| Responsiveness | 4.8/5.0 | Recovered 90% of its height in 0.4 seconds |
| Edge Support | 4.4/5.0 | Stable for sleeping and reasonably firm for sitting |
| Durability | 4.6/5.0 | Just 0.05 inch of indentation after 1,500 cycles |
| Overall | 4.4/5.0 | Best for cooling and movement, weaker for motion control |
Cashmere
Our Testing Experience

Cashmere lets the shoulder and hip settle farther into the surface than the other models. We rated it 5.5 out of 10 for firmness, and Mia could stay on her side through a full night without the concentrated shoulder pressure she felt on Comfort Plus. The surface rose 7.2°F after 30 minutes and took 1.8 seconds to recover 90% of its height, so it clearly runs warmer and slower than Luxury. In return, its 0.11 g motion peak was the lowest in the test. The 1,500-cycle roll test left a 0.08-inch indentation with no new noise. Cashmere is the most comfortable option for pressure-sensitive side sleepers, provided they do not sleep especially hot.
-
What we liked
-
The memory-foam comfort layer spreads pressure well at the shoulder and hip.
-
Partner movement stays localized.
-
The cashmere fabric has the softest hand feel in the group.
-
-
Who it is best for
-
Side sleepers who need more contouring.
-
Sleepers who prefer a close, cushioned feel over quick rebound.
-
-
Where it falls short
-
It stores more heat than the two Luxury models.
-
Combination sleepers may notice the slower recovery.
-
The edge compresses more during sitting.
-

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Best pressure relief in the group | Largest 30-minute temperature rise |
| Lowest motion reading | Slowest recovery |
| Soft, comfortable cover | Softer sitting edge |
| Good fit for side sleepers | Not reversible |

Details
-
Core: pocket spring
-
Height range: 20–30 cm
-
Dimensions: customizable
-
Reversible: no
-
Manufacturer-listed materials: Memory Foam, Biogreen
-
Cover: cashmere fabric
-
Listed certifications: IMO/MED and California CPSC 16 CFR 1633/32

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2/5.0 | Good underlying support with more sink at the top |
| Cooling | 3.9/5.0 | Surface temperature rose 7.2°F after 30 minutes |
| Pressure Relief | 4.7/5.0 | Best shoulder and hip cushioning for side sleeping |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6/5.0 | Lowest measured motion peak at 0.11 g |
| Responsiveness | 4.0/5.0 | Took 1.8 seconds to recover 90% of its height |
| Edge Support | 4.1/5.0 | Adequate for sleeping; noticeably softer for sitting |
| Durability | 4.4/5.0 | Retained shape with a 0.08-inch residual indentation |
| Overall | 4.3/5.0 | Best for contouring and quiet sleep, but not for heat |
Comfort Plus
Our Testing Experience

Comfort Plus feels firmer and less padded than the three higher-profile models. We rated it 7.0 out of 10, and a 44-pound weight compressed the center by 1.2 inches. At the edge, the same load produced 2.0 inches of compression, compared with 1.4 inches at the center of the test zone. The surface warmed 5.3°F after 30 minutes, and the roll test left a 0.05-inch indentation after 1,500 cycles. The seven-zone support kept the back and stomach sleepers level, while the side sleeper felt more pressure at the shoulder. Its reversible, rollable construction is useful in a frequently changed guest or rental room, but it is not the model to choose for a plush surface.
-
What we liked
-
The firmer center zones keep the hips from dropping.
-
The reversible build helps distribute wear.
-
Its lower profile is easier to handle than the Luxury models.
-
-
Who it is best for
-
Back and stomach sleepers who prefer firm support.
-
Guest rooms and multi-user homes.
-
-
Where it falls short
-
Side sleepers may feel pressure at the shoulder and hip.
-
The comfort layer has less depth than the other three models.
-
The edge softens more than the center under the same load.
-
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Seven-zone pocket-spring support | Limited shoulder cushioning |
| Reversible and rollable | Edge compresses more than the center |
| Good alignment for back and stomach sleepers | Less refined surface feel |
| Low residual indentation in the roll test | Firm feel will not suit everyone |

Details
-
Core: seven-zone pocket spring
-
Height range: 15–25 cm
-
Dimensions: customizable
-
Reversible: yes
-
Rollable: yes
-
Manufacturer-listed material: Materfoam Medium

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4/5.0 | Firm zones held the hips level |
| Cooling | 4.3/5.0 | Surface temperature rose 5.3°F after 30 minutes |
| Pressure Relief | 3.8/5.0 | Side sleepers noticed shoulder pressure sooner |
| Motion Isolation | 4.1/5.0 | Stable overall, with some spring movement |
| Responsiveness | 4.4/5.0 | Easy to turn on without a slow foam layer |
| Edge Support | 4.3/5.0 | Usable edge, though it compressed more than the center |
| Durability | 4.2/5.0 | Only 0.05 inch of indentation after the roll test |
| Overall | 4.2/5.0 | A durable, practical option with limited plushness |
How the Four Models Scored
| Mattress | Overall | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luxury Dream | 4.5/5.0 | 4.6/5.0 | 4.5/5.0 | 4.6/5.0 | 4.3/5.0 | 4.5/5.0 | 4.5/5.0 |
| Luxury | 4.4/5.0 | 4.5/5.0 | 4.1/5.0 | 4.7/5.0 | 4.0/5.0 | 4.6/5.0 | 4.8/5.0 |
| Cashmere | 4.3/5.0 | 4.2/5.0 | 4.7/5.0 | 3.9/5.0 | 4.6/5.0 | 4.4/5.0 | 4.0/5.0 |
| Comfort Plus | 4.2/5.0 | 4.4/5.0 | 3.8/5.0 | 4.3/5.0 | 4.1/5.0 | 4.2/5.0 | 4.4/5.0 |
Luxury Dream offers the most even performance. Luxury wins on cooling and response but gives up motion control. Cashmere leads for pressure relief and motion isolation, while Comfort Plus trades cushioning for firm, reversible support.
Which Matermoll Model Fits Your Sleep Style?
Start with your sleeping position, sensitivity to heat, and tolerance for movement. A softer firmness is useful only if it keeps pressure off the shoulder without pulling the hips out of alignment. If you turn often, prioritize response. If you wake when a partner moves, motion isolation matters more than bounce.
-
Side sleepers: Cashmere gives the deepest pressure relief; Luxury Dream is the cooler alternative.
-
Back sleepers: Luxury Dream balances cushion and alignment, while Luxury feels firmer and more lifted.
-
Hot sleepers: Luxury had the lowest measured temperature rise, followed by Luxury Dream.
-
Guest rooms: Comfort Plus is reversible, rollable, and easier to move.
-
Motion-sensitive couples: Cashmere recorded the lowest motion peak.
Matermoll uses a custom-quote process rather than a standard online price. Ask for the exact layer build, finished height, dimensions, delivery charge, lead time, warranty, and return terms in writing before paying. Those details can vary by configuration and region.
Tradeoffs to Know
Luxury Dream
-
The tall build needs deeper sheets.
-
Some spring movement reaches the other side.
-
The sitting edge is softer than the center.
Luxury
-
It transfers the most motion of the four.
-
Shoulder contouring is limited for strict side sleepers.
-
The responsive surface may feel too active for light sleepers.
Cashmere
-
It had the largest temperature rise.
-
The comfort layer is slowest to recover.
-
The edge compresses noticeably while sitting.
Comfort Plus
-
It provides the least pressure relief.
-
The thinner comfort layer feels less refined.
-
Its firm surface is not a good match for most lightweight side sleepers.
Matermoll Compared With U.S. Alternatives
Matermoll makes sense when custom dimensions, Italian materials, or a particular commercial or marine application matters more than one-click ordering. Because every model is quote-based, compare the full delivered price and written service terms—not just the construction.
Saatva Classic is the simpler U.S. purchase for a responsive luxury-spring feel. It offers fixed sizes, three firmness choices, direct ordering, in-room setup, and clearly published trial and warranty terms. It does not provide Matermoll's same degree of size customization, but it removes much of the uncertainty from buying.
TEMPUR-Adapt is the better alternative when deep contouring and motion control matter more than airflow or quick rebound. Its slow, close feel is nearer to Cashmere than Luxury, though shoppers who change positions often may prefer Matermoll's springier models.
Beautyrest Black Hybrid combines contouring foams with pocketed coils and is easier to find through U.S. retail channels. The range spans several series and feels, so compare the exact model rather than the collection name. It is the most useful alternative for shoppers who want to try a luxury hybrid locally before ordering.
Before You Order
-
Request a written specification sheet for the exact height and layer configuration in your quote.
-
Confirm delivery access and setup before ordering a 30–35 cm model.
-
Use deep-pocket sheets for the taller Luxury and Luxury Dream builds.
-
A thin, breathable protector preserves more of the cooling feel than a thick padded cover.
-
Give the mattress several full nights before deciding whether the firmness works for you.
-
Rotate nonreversible models; flip Comfort Plus only according to the care instructions supplied with your build.
-
If you sit on the bed to dress, test the edge support before committing to Cashmere.
-
Use a rigid, correctly sized foundation so motion and edge readings are not made worse by the frame.
-
Keep the room temperature consistent during the first week so heat retention is easier to judge.
FAQs
Which Matermoll mattress stayed coolest overnight?
Luxury stayed coolest. Its surface temperature rose 3.7°F after 30 minutes, compared with 4.8°F for Luxury Dream, 5.3°F for Comfort Plus, and 7.2°F for Cashmere.
Which model is best for shoulder and hip pressure relief?
Cashmere is the best choice. Its slower memory-foam comfort layer let the shoulder and hip settle more evenly than the firmer Comfort Plus or the more responsive Luxury.
Is Comfort Plus comfortable enough for everyday use?
Yes, especially for back and stomach sleepers who prefer firm support. Most strict side sleepers will be more comfortable on Cashmere or Luxury Dream.
Which model is easiest to turn on?
Luxury was easiest to move on. Its comfort layer recovered 90% of its height in 0.4 seconds, while Cashmere took 1.8 seconds.