Minotti Sofa Reviews: Hamilton, Freeman, Connery Tested

Minotti represents the pinnacle of Italian furniture design. The brand is known for precision, luxury materials, and a timeless aesthetic. I have always admired their catalogs. I wanted to see if these sofas live up to the hype in real life. My team and I secured seven of their most iconic models. We moved them into our testing lab for a month of intensive use. We needed to look past the beautiful photography. We wanted to feel the foam, the fabric, and the frames.

Our testing team includes people with very different needs. I have mild back pain and look for lumbar support. Marcus is a large guy who tests durability and frame strength. Mia is petite and checks if she gets swallowed by deep seats. Carlos tries to work from every sofa to test upright ergonomics. Jenna and Ethan are our couple testers. They check for motion transfer and cuddling space. Jamal brings a tall perspective to legroom and seat depth.

Dr. Adrian Walker joined us to analyze the ergonomics. He did not sit on the sofas. He observed our postures. He pointed out where our spines were aligned or strained. He offered clinical insights on pressure distribution. This review is not just about style. It is about how these expensive pieces function in a real home. We want to tell you the truth about living with Minotti.

Product Overview

We selected seven distinct models that represent the breadth of the Minotti collection.

Sofa Model	Pros	Cons	Ideal For	Price	Overall Score
Hamilton	Timeless design, firm support.	Very low seat height.	Modern minimalist living rooms.	High Luxury	4.7
Freeman	Dual comfort zones, versatile.	Large footprint required.	Open-plan spaces, families.	High Luxury	4.8
Connery	Mid-century vibe, unique chaise.	Round elements harder to style.	Design-forward homes.	High Luxury	4.6
Roger	Highly customizable, couture look.	extremely expensive options.	Large estates, grand rooms.	Ultra Luxury	4.9
Goodman	Compact footprint, ergonomic.	Matelassé stitching catches crumbs.	Apartments, smaller luxury spaces.	High Luxury	4.5
Dylan	Floating aesthetic, modern lines.	Thin cushions feel firmer.	Architectural spaces, galleries.	High Luxury	4.6
Twiggy	Sculptural curves, fashion piece.	Awkward for working/upright sitting.	Formal sitting rooms, lobbies.	High Luxury	4.4

Minotti Sofa Comparison Chart

Feature	Hamilton	Freeman	Connery	Roger	Goodman	Dylan	Twiggy
Type	Modular System	Dual Identity System	Modular System	Open Landscape System	Suspended Modular	Suspended Modular	Curved Modular
Seat Height	Low (approx 15")	Low/Medium	Low	Low	Medium	Medium	Medium
Seat Depth	Deep	Varied (Duvet/Tailor)	Deep	Varied	Compact	Standard	Varied
Cushioning	Goose Down/Foam	Memory Foam/Down	Goose Down	High-Density Foam	Pocket Springs	Multi-density Foam	Polyurethane Foam
Base Style	Black Nickel Metal	Metal Frame	Metal/Leather Base	Aluminum Base	Metal Feet	Suspended Blade	Semi-hidden
Aesthetic	Linear, Cubist	Soft vs. Structured	Mid-Century Modern	Architectural	1970s Revival	Rationalist	Sculptural/Organic
Best For	Lounging	Mixed Use	Style Statement	Large Scale Hosting	Compact Comfort	Visual Lightness	Conversation

What We Tested and How We Tested It

We treated these luxury items like daily drivers. We did not use coasters. We wore jeans. We allowed our tester dogs to walk near them (but not on them). I focused heavily on the "settling" period. I wanted to see if the goose down retained its loft. We sat in the same spot for four hours straight. This tested the foam density resilience. We evaluated the fabric recovery. We checked if the leather pooled or stretched after use.

Testers rotated through specific scenarios. Marcus performed the "heavy drop" test. He sat down abruptly to check frame noise. Mia tested the "curl up" factor in the corners. She evaluated the softness of the armrests. Carlos set up his laptop. He tried to type for an hour. He checked for neck strain and wrist support. Jenna and Ethan watched full movies. They tested the "cuddle gap" between modules.

Dr. Walker monitored our spinal curves. He used a goniometer to measure hip angles. He noted if the low seats caused difficulty standing up. We checked the temperature regulation of the fabrics. We noted if the leather ran hot or cold. We checked the ease of cleaning. We vacuumed the crevices. We evaluated the modular connectors. We checked if the pieces drifted apart on hard floors.

Testing Team Takeaways

I found the Minotti aesthetic dominating. These sofas demand attention. They are low and wide. They change the proportion of a room. I realized that "low" is a Minotti signature. You sit in the room, not just on furniture. The craftsmanship is flawless. I saw no loose threads. The leather smells incredible.

Marcus had trouble with the height. He said, "I have to do a squat to get down here." He loved the width, though. He felt supported across his broad shoulders. He found the frames incredibly stiff. He noted, "There is zero flex when I lean back." He liked the stability. He felt secure.

Mia loved the depth. She could pull her legs up easily. She stated, "I live on this sofa, I don't just sit." She found the fabrics soft against her skin. She disliked the heavy cushions. She struggled to fluff them. They were heavy and dense.

Carlos struggled to work. The backs are often low. He said, "I have no head support for thinking." He found the "Tailor" sections of the Freeman best. They offered firmer support. He gave up on the Twiggy. The curves made typing impossible.

Jenna and Ethan enjoyed the modular freedom. They liked moving pieces to create islands. Jenna noted, "We can face each other or the TV." They found the motion isolation excellent. The heavy construction dampens movement.

Jamal appreciated the long chaise options. His legs didn't hang off. He remarked, "Finally, a chaise that fits a six-foot-three guy." He found the leather slippery on the Connery. He had to engage his core to stay upright.

Minotti Sofa: Our Testing Experience

1. Hamilton Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I started with the Hamilton. This is a classic Minotti piece. It sits very close to the ground. I lowered myself onto the Black-Nickel base. The seat cushions are filled with goose down. I felt a slow, luxurious sink. It was not a collapse. It was a controlled descent. The Core is resilient polyurethane. It stopped me at the right point. I sat there for an hour reading. My lower back felt supported by the lumbar cushion. The armrest is wide and flat. I rested a book on it comfortably.

Marcus tested the frame rigidity. He sat heavily on the edge. The metal base didn't flex. He said, "This thing is built like a tank." He liked the firm underlying feeling. However, he struggled to stand up. The low height challenged his knees. He had to use the armrest for leverage. The armrest held his weight easily. It is solid wood covered in foam.

Mia curled into the corner unit. She pulled a blanket over her. The deep seat accommodated her entire body. She whispered, "I feel like I am in a nest." The backrest is angled perfectly for lounging. She did not need extra pillows. Dr. Walker observed her posture. He noted her spine was in a relaxed C-curve. Dr. Walker noted, "This position reduces muscle tension but is not for active tasks."

Jenna and Ethan sat together for a movie. The separation between cushions is minimal. They did not feel a gap. They liked the warmth of the fabric. It breathed well. They did not overheat. However, Ethan found the back too low for his head. He had to slide down to rest his neck. This compromised his viewing angle.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Iconic, sleek design.	Very low seat height (hard to exit).
Incredible build quality.	Low back offers no head support.
Goose down feels luxurious.	Requires regular cushion fluffing.
Wide armrests are functional.	Expensive to reupholster.

Details:

• Price: High Luxury Tier.

• Configuration: Modular system (seats, chaises, islands).

• Seat Height: Approx 15 inches.

• Depth: 41 inches (Standard).

• Materials: Solid wood structure, metal base.

• Cushioning: Channelled goose down with PU foam core.

• Fabric: Removable fabric or fixed leather.

• Assembly: Professional installation recommended.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Overall Score	4.7	A masterpiece of low-slung luxury.
Seat Comfort	4.8	Perfect balance of soft down and firm core.
Back Support	3.5	Low profile limits upper back support.
Seat Depth Fit	4.5	Deep seats are great for lounging, not sitting.
Cooling	4.5	Breathable materials prevent heat buildup.
Durability	5.0	Metal base and wood frame are indestructible.
Ease of Movement	3.0	Heavy modules; hard to stand up from.

2. Freeman Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I moved to the Freeman. This sofa has a split personality. It has "Duvet" elements and "Tailor" elements. I tested the "Duvet" side first. It is soft and sinking. It feels like a high-end bed. I relaxed instantly. Then I shifted to the "Tailor" side. It is firmer. The stitching is defined. It felt like a suit. I sat upright. I could drink coffee here without spilling. The versatility impressed me.

Carlos set up his workspace on the "Tailor" section. The seat is flatter. He noted, "I am not fighting gravity here." He typed for two hours. The back support was adequate. The armrest on this side is a "Wing" armrest. It is thin and elegant. It did not get in his way. He preferred this side for productivity.

Jenna and Ethan claimed the "Duvet" section. They laid down. The cushions are wider. Jenna said, "We fit perfectly without touching the edges." They loved the softness. It felt cozy. They noticed the memory foam insert. It contoured to their bodies. They did not disturb each other when moving.

Jamal tested the connection between the two types. He sat in the middle. He felt the transition. It was noticeable but not uncomfortable. He remarked, "It is like having two sofas in one." He liked the aesthetic contrast. The leather and fabric mix looked stunning. Dr. Walker praised the variety. Dr. Walker commented, "Users can choose their support level based on current activity."

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Versatile dual comfort zones.	Requires a very large room.
Stunning mix of materials.	Complex to configure/order.
"Tailor" side offers support.	"Duvet" side needs fluffing.
"Duvet" side offers comfort.	High price point.

Details:

• Price: High Luxury Tier.

• Configuration: "Duvet" (soft) and "Tailor" (firm) elements.

• Seat Height: Varied slightly by compression.

• Depth: Varied by module.

• Materials: Polyurethane foam, memory foam, down.

• Base: Extruded aluminum frame.

• Fabric: Leather and Fabric combinations.

• Features: Integrated side tables available.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Overall Score	4.8	The ultimate hybrid for diverse needs.
Seat Comfort	5.0	Options for both soft and firm preferences.
Back Support	4.0	Better support on the Tailor sections.
Seat Depth Fit	4.8	Variety of depths suits all testers.
Cooling	4.0	Memory foam retains slight heat.
Durability	4.8	Complex stitching holds up well.
Ease of Movement	4.0	Firm sections are easier to exit.

3. Connery Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I approached the Connery. It screams Mid-Century Modern. The base is leather-clad. It looks architectural. I sat on the round chaise element. It is huge. I felt like a Bond villain. The seat is a single continuous cushion. There are no cracks to lose a phone in. I laid back. The leather was cool to the touch. It felt smooth. I slid a little. The leather is very high quality and slick.

Mia tried to curl up. The round shape was tricky. She laughed, "I don't know which way to face." She eventually oriented herself toward the center. She liked the freedom. She wasn't boxed in by arms. She placed a tray on the leather base. It acted as a side table. She liked that functionality.

Marcus checked the base durability. He kicked it accidentally. The leather resisted the scuff. He said, "This leather wrap is tough." He sat on the standard linear seat. It felt firmer than the Hamilton. The "C" shaped backrest hugged him. He liked the visual lightness. The legs are set back. The sofa floats.

Dr. Walker looked at the lack of high back support. He noted the aesthetic purity comes at an ergonomic cost. Dr. Walker noted, "The low back requires significant core engagement for upright sitting." He suggested this sofa for short-duration social settings. It is great for cocktails. It is less good for a Netflix marathon.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Unique, architectural design.	Leather can be slippery.
Round chaise is a statement.	Very expensive materials.
Integrated tables/shelves.	Low back is fatiguing.
Floating visual effect.	Large footprint for round pieces.

Details:

• Price: High Luxury Tier.

• Configuration: Linear and curved/round modules.

• Seat Height: Low profile.

• Depth: Deep (approx 40 inches).

• Materials: Padded structure, leather base.

• Cushioning: Channelled goose down.

• Legs: Extruded aluminum plates.

• Fabric: Customizable leather/fabric mix.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Overall Score	4.6	A style statement with functional trade-offs.
Seat Comfort	4.2	Firm and slick; less cozy than others.
Back Support	3.5	Curved backs offer style, not height.
Seat Depth Fit	4.5	Generous depth for lounging.
Cooling	4.0	Leather stays cool initially.
Durability	4.8	Base protection is excellent.
Ease of Movement	4.0	Firm seat helps egress; slickness hurts.

4. Roger Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I tested the Roger next. This is an "open landscape" system. It felt huge. I sat on a module with no back, just a weighted pillow. I could sit facing either way. I liked the flexibility. I felt like I was in a hotel lobby. I adjusted the back cushion. It is movable. I created my own spot. The foam is high-density. It feels very modern and resilient.

Jamal stretched out on the "Daybed" element. It is massive. He said, "I could sleep here comfortably." He liked the openness. He didn't feel hemmed in. He moved the weighted backrest to support his legs. He created a custom recliner. He was impressed by the weight of the cushions. They do not slide easily.

Jenna and Ethan tried to configure a conversation area. They sat on opposite sides of a large island. They faced each other. Ethan noted, "It is great for parties." They liked the palisander wood storage box integrated into the seat. They put their drinks there. It was convenient.

Carlos tried to work. He struggled. The movable backs shift slightly when you lean hard. He noted, "I don't trust it to hold my full weight for hours." He felt he had to balance himself. Dr. Walker observed the lack of fixed support. Dr. Walker commented, "This relies on the user's proprioception to maintain balance." It is active sitting.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Ultimate customization.	Extremely expensive.
Integrated storage/tables.	Requires massive floor space.
Modern, airy aesthetic.	Movable backs can shift.
High-tech foam feel.	Less cozy "nesting" feel.

Details:

• Price: Ultra Luxury Tier.

• Configuration: Open system (elements, cases, daybeds).

• Seat Height: Low.

• Depth: Varied (very deep options).

• Materials: Aluminum frame, wood storage.

• Cushioning: High-resilience polyurethane foam.

• Fabric: Couture-inspired upholstery.

• Assembly: Complex custom setup.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Overall Score	4.9	The future of haute couture seating.
Seat Comfort	4.5	Firm, responsive, and customizable.
Back Support	3.8	Movable backs offer variable support.
Seat Depth Fit	5.0	Choose your own depth adventure.
Cooling	4.5	Open design promotes airflow.
Durability	4.8	Materials are top-tier; mechanics are solid.
Ease of Movement	4.5	Open edges make access easy.

5. Goodman Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I sat on the Goodman. It feels more compact than the others. It has a 1970s revival vibe. I noticed the matelassé stitching immediately. It creates a quilted texture. I ran my hand over it. It feels expensive. I sat down. It uses pocket springs. I felt a bounce. It is different from the foam blocks. It felt more like a traditional mattress. I liked the liveliness.

Mia appreciated the scale. It felt less overwhelming. She said, "This fits me better." Her feet touched the floor. She liked the "shadow" effect of the stitching. It hides wrinkles. She sat in the corner. It felt structured. She did not sink in too deep. She felt supported.

Marcus checked the stitching durability. He pulled on the fabric slightly. It held tight. He noted, "This stitching is robust." However, he ate a cracker. Crumbs fell into the deep grooves. He had to vacuum them out. He found that annoying. He liked the metal feet. They are set back.

Dr. Walker approved of the pocket springs. Dr. Walker noted, "Springs provide active pushback, aiding in lumbar curve maintenance." He found this sofa better for posture than the down-filled ones. He recommended it for people who dislike "sinking."

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Compact, ergonomic scale.	Stitching traps debris.
Pocket springs offer bounce.	Less "lounge" depth.
Beautiful textured aesthetic.	Visual "heaviness" due to bulk.
Good upright support.	Firmness might surprise some.

Details:

• Price: High Luxury Tier.

• Configuration: Modular system.

• Seat Height: Medium.

• Depth: Compact (approx 37 inches).

• Materials: Pocket springs, polyurethane.

• Aesthetic: 1970s geometric.

• Fabric: Specific textiles for stitching.

• Legs: Shadow bronze metal.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Overall Score	4.5	A structured, rhythmic design piece.
Seat Comfort	4.5	Springs provide excellent active support.
Back Support	4.2	Firmer back helps upright posture.
Seat Depth Fit	4.8	More manageable depth for average users.
Cooling	4.0	Quilted fabric is thicker/warmer.
Durability	4.5	Stitching is a potential wear point.
Ease of Movement	4.8	Higher seat/springs make standing easy.

6. Dylan Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I tested the Dylan. It looks suspended. The base is thin blades. It looks very light. I sat down. The cushions are thinner than the Hamilton. They are multi-density foam. They felt firm. I did not sink much. I liked the clean lines. I felt very organized sitting there. I placed my arm on the backrest. It is thin. It is not for napping.

Ethan liked the visual lightness. He said, "It doesn't block the view." He sat on the edge. The blade leg held firm. There was no wobble. He liked the rigorous geometry. He felt it suited a formal room. He tried to lounge. He couldn't get comfortable. It is too structured.

Jenna found the leather straps attractive. They hold the cushions. She noted, "The details are beautiful." She felt the cushions were too hard for cuddling. She preferred the Freeman for that. She saw this as a "cocktail" sofa.

Dr. Walker observed the seat angle. It is flat. Dr. Walker noted, "This promotes a neutral pelvic position." He liked the firmness for older users. It is easy to get out of. He warned about the hard edges for children.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Light, suspended aesthetic.	Very firm seating.
Architectural precision.	Thin armrests/backs.
Excellent construction.	Not for cozy lounging.
Easy to clean underneath.	Sharp corners.

Details:

• Price: High Luxury Tier.

• Configuration: Modular system.

• Seat Height: Medium.

• Depth: Standard.

• Base: Extruded aluminum blades.

• Cushioning: Variable density foam.

• Style: Rationalist/Modern.

• Fabric: Leather/Fabric mix.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Overall Score	4.6	Rationalist perfection for the modern eye.
Seat Comfort	4.0	Firm, structured, not plush.
Back Support	4.0	Good vertical support.
Seat Depth Fit	4.5	Standard depth fits most.
Cooling	4.5	Air flows freely underneath.
Durability	4.8	Solid construction materials.
Ease of Movement	5.0	Firm seat aids egress.

7. Twiggy Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I finished with the Twiggy. It is all curves. It looks like a sculpture. I sat on the curved element. It oriented me toward the center of the room. I felt social. The stitching is unique. It creates a geometric pattern. The foam is firm. It holds the curved shape well. I could not lie down flat. The curve prevented it.

Carlos tried to use his laptop. It was a disaster. He laughed, "There is no straight edge to align with." He slid sideways. He gave up. He decided to drink an espresso instead. He felt stylish.

Mia loved the shape. She said, "It breaks up the boxy room." She sat on the "Small" element. It is like an armchair. She liked the coziness. She felt the leather was stitched perfectly. There were no wrinkles on the curves.

Dr. Walker noted the lack of lumbar support on the curve. Dr. Walker noted, "The backrest follows a radius, not the spine." He suggested it for short durations. He liked the open posture it encourages. It opens the chest.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Sculptural, artistic shape.	Difficult to arrange in corners.
Encourages social interaction.	Poor for working/napping.
Impeccable curved stitching.	Firm comfort level.
Visual focal point.	Expensive per module.

Details:

• Price: High Luxury Tier.

• Configuration: Curved/Organic modules.

• Seat Height: Medium.

• Depth: Varied.

• Materials: Metal frame, polyurethane.

• Stitching: Geometric detail.

• Base: Semi-hidden aluminum.

• Style: Fashion-forward.

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Overall Score	4.4	Furniture as fashion.
Seat Comfort	4.0	Firm to maintain shape.
Back Support	3.5	Curve offers minimal lumbar help.
Seat Depth Fit	4.2	Varied depth is tricky.
Cooling	4.0	Standard performance.
Durability	4.5	Maintains shape well.
Ease of Movement	4.5	Open shape allows movement.

Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas

Sofa	Overall Score	Seat Comfort	Back Support	Seat Depth Fit	Cooling	Durability	Ease of Movement
Hamilton	4.7	4.8	3.5	4.5	4.5	5.0	3.0
Freeman	4.8	5.0	4.0	4.8	4.0	4.8	4.0
Connery	4.6	4.2	3.5	4.5	4.0	4.8	4.0
Roger	4.9	4.5	3.8	5.0	4.5	4.8	4.5
Goodman	4.5	4.5	4.2	4.8	4.0	4.5	4.8
Dylan	4.6	4.0	4.0	4.5	4.5	4.8	5.0
Twiggy	4.4	4.0	3.5	4.2	4.0	4.5	4.5

The scores reveal a clear hierarchy of purpose. The Freeman and Hamilton are the comfort kings. They use down and memory foam to create a luxury sink. However, they sacrifice ease of movement due to low heights. The Goodman and Dylan are the structural leaders. They offer firmness and support. They are better for posture but less "cozy." The Roger is the ultimate all-rounder. It allows you to build your own comfort. The Twiggy is a specialist. It sacrifices some comfort for pure style.

Best Picks

• Best Minotti Sofa for Ultimate Comfort: The Freeman

  The dual "Duvet" and "Tailor" personalities make this unbeatable. You get the deep sink for movies and the firm support for hosting. It adapts to every mood in the house.

• Best Minotti Sofa for Modern Style: The Connery

  The round chaise and leather base define a room. It captures the mid-century spirit with a contemporary aggressive edge. It is the piece your guests will talk about.

• Best Minotti Sofa for Customization: The Roger

  The open landscape concept is revolutionary. You can configure it as a daybed, a sofa, or an island. It fits massive spaces where standard sofas get lost.

How to Choose the Minotti Sofa?

Choosing a Minotti requires analyzing your room volume and your knees.

First, check your ceiling height and room size. These sofas are massive. The Roger and Freeman need vast open spaces to breathe. If you put them in a small room, they will look like a beached whale. For smaller luxury apartments, the Goodman is the only safe choice. It has a tighter footprint.

Second, consider your mobility. Minotti sofas are famously low. The Hamilton sits at 15 inches. If you have trouble standing up from a squat, do not buy it. Look at the Dylan or Goodman. They sit higher on their legs.

Third, define the usage. If this is for a formal living room where you drink wine and talk, get the Dylan or Connery. They keep you upright. If this is for a media room where you nap and binge TV, get the Freeman (Duvet side) or Hamilton. Their down filling invites lounging.

Limitations

Minotti sofas have distinct limitations. The primary issue is the low back height. Almost every model stops at the mid-back. There is no head support. If you want to watch a two-hour movie, you will slide down. You will sacrifice posture for comfort. This is a design choice, not a flaw, but it affects usability.

The maintenance is also significant. The down-filled models (Hamilton, Connery) require daily fluffing. If you do not beat the cushions, they look sloppy. They develop "comfort wrinkles." If you want a crisp look without effort, these are not for you.

Finally, the price is a barrier. These are investment-grade assets. The lead times can be long. Replacement parts are expensive. You are buying into a luxury ecosystem that requires care and patience.

Is the Minotti Sofa worth it?

Yes, the Minotti sofa is worth the investment for specific buyers.The craftsmanship is objectively superior to mass-market brands.The internal frames are built to last decades.The resale value remains higher than average furniture.

However, for pure ergonomic comfort, the value is debatable.You can find more supportive sofas for less money.You are paying for the Rodolfo Dordoni design legacy.You are paying for the status of the brand.If you value art and architecture in your home, it is worth it.If you just want a comfortable place to sit, it is an indulgence.

FAQs

1. Are Minotti sofas comfortable for sleeping?

Yes, the deep-seat models like the Hamilton and Roger are excellent for napping. The cushions are wide and flat. However, they are not sleeper sofas with pull-out mattresses.

2. How do I clean Minotti fabric?

Most Minotti fabric covers are removable. We recommend professional dry cleaning. Do not wash them in a machine. The structured fit will be ruined by shrinkage.

3. Why are Minotti sofas so low?

The low profile is a stylistic choice. It emphasizes the horizontal lines of modern architecture. It makes ceilings look higher. It encourages a relaxed, lounging posture.

4. Can I customize the Connery base?

Yes, the base can be clad in various leathers or fabrics. You can mix and match materials to create a unique look. This is a key feature of the system.

5. Does the goose down cause allergies?

Minotti uses sterilized, high-quality down. However, if you are highly sensitive, request the memory foam or polyurethane options like the Roger or Dylan.

6. Do the sections slide apart?

Minotti uses heavy-duty metal connectors. In our testing, the sections stayed locked together. They did not drift, even on polished concrete floors.

7. Is the Roger system difficult to plan?

Yes, it is complex. There are dozens of elements. We recommend working with a showroom designer. It is easy to order the wrong configuration without help.