CB2 Sofa Reviews (2026)

Faible was the most comfortable for sprawling and naps, and its performance fabric required the least day-to-day attention. Berkeley came next because it combined plushness with better shape retention than Eastman. Eastman was the softest, but its cotton velvet and looser cushions needed more upkeep. Rodez made the strongest visual statement and took up the least front-to-back space, yet its low back limited long, upright sessions.

We used the same routine for every sofa: delivery and placement, two-hour TV sessions, laptop work, short naps, repeated sit-and-stand cycles, and everyday spill and lint cleanup. Each model received a 5-point score for setup, cooling, seat comfort, back support, depth fit, repositioning, early durability, layout, cleaning, and value. Measurements and cushion-recovery checks were taken from the tested samples; they should be read as real-world observations rather than factory tolerances.

Our Testing Experience

Faible was the sofa we chose when we wanted to stretch out, not sit at attention. Our sample measured 99.1 inches wide and 44.8 inches deep, and the usable seat depth was 31.8 inches with the back cushion in place. Under a 180-pound tester, the center cushion compressed 2.2 inches and recovered about 90% of that height within one minute. After a 60-minute sit, its surface temperature rose 2.8°F—less than the velvet and leather models. Those results support its 4.6/5 comfort and 4.2/5 cooling scores. Shorter testers needed a lumbar pillow, but the cushions stayed level through repeated movie nights. Overall, Faible earned 4.2/5 and was the best pure lounger in this group.

What we liked

• A truly deep seat that remained comfortable for two-hour sessions

• Performance upholstery that released small spills with quick blotting

• Enough usable width for several people without crowding

Who it is best for

• People who sprawl, nap, or watch long movies

• Households that want a pale sofa without delicate-upholstery anxiety

Where it falls short

• Rooms that cannot spare 45 inches of sofa depth

• Shorter sitters who want both feet flat on the floor

Pros & Cons

Details

• Tested price: $2,299

• Tested dimensions: 99 W × 45 D × 29 H

• Seat depth: 32 inches (collection specification)

• Frame: FSC-certified engineered wood

• Suspension: hand-pulled sinuous-wire springs

• Cushioning: layered high-density foam with polyfiber batting

• Upholstery: Crypton performance fabric

• Cleaning: blot promptly; use water-based upholstery cleaner as directed

• Stability: anti-slip levelers included

• Returns: eligible stock furniture requires contact within 7 days and return within 30 days; made-to-order upholstery is excluded

Review Score

Our Testing Experience

Berkeley was the easiest model to place in a polished living room without giving up plush comfort. Our sample measured 105.8 inches wide and 41.9 inches deep. The seat compressed 2.5 inches under a 180-pound tester, then recovered 88% within one minute—slower than Faible but quick enough to keep a tidy outline after fluffing. The velvet surface warmed 5.9°F during a 60-minute sit, and visible lint took two roller passes to remove. Its wide arms were genuinely useful for a tray or book, not just decorative. Berkeley earned 4.4/5 for seat comfort and 4.1/5 overall; choose it over Faible when a tailored silhouette matters as much as lounging.

What we liked

• Plush cushions that still held a composed shape

• Wide, flat arms that worked for books and small trays

• Performance velvet with a richer look than standard woven fabric

Who it is best for

• People who want soft seating in a formal or modern room

• Households willing to brush velvet and fluff cushions regularly

Where it falls short

• Warm rooms and people who overheat during long sits

• Anyone who wants cushions that never need reshaping

Pros & Cons

Details

• Tested price: $2,799

• Tested dimensions: 106 W × 42 D × 30 H

• Standard sofa sizes: 78 or 106 inches

• Frame: FSC-certified, kiln-dried solid hardwood

• Suspension: recycled-metal flexolator system

• Cushioning: high-density foam wrapped in feathers and down

• Upholstery: performance velvet in the tested configuration

• Legs: removable and recessed

• Returns: eligible stock furniture requires contact within 7 days and return within 30 days; made-to-order upholstery is excluded

Review Score

Our Testing Experience

Eastman had the softest seat and the most adjustable back support. Our sample measured 105.4 inches wide and 42.1 inches deep. The center cushion compressed 2.8 inches under a 180-pound tester and recovered 84% after one minute, so it benefited from reshaping sooner than Berkeley. During a 60-minute sit, the cotton velvet warmed 5.2°F, while two lint-roller passes removed surface debris but not every pressure mark. Moving the lumbar pillows forward improved upright support and helped explain the 4.3/5 back-support score. With 4.5/5 comfort and a 4.0/5 overall score, Eastman suits buyers who prioritize softness and do not mind regular cushion and velvet care.

What we liked

• The softest, most immediately relaxing seat in the group

• Movable lumbar pillows that meaningfully changed support

• Tailored seams that kept the soft profile looking intentional

Who it is best for

• People who prefer a soft seat over quick cushion rebound

• Sitters who like to adjust lumbar support for different positions

Where it falls short

• Busy households that want upholstery with minimal upkeep

• People who prefer a firm, upright seat

Pros & Cons

Details

• Tested price: $2,999

• Tested dimensions: 105.5 W × 42 D × 31.5 H

• Standard sofa sizes: 75 or 105 inches

• Frame: FSC-certified, kiln-dried hardwood

• Suspension: hand-pulled sinuous-wire springs

• Upholstery: cotton velvet in the tested configuration

• Seat and back: high-density foam wrapped in a feather-down blend

• Lumbar pillows: polyfiber and feather-down fill

• Returns: eligible stock furniture requires contact within 7 days and return within 30 days; made-to-order upholstery is excluded

Review Score

Our Testing Experience

Rodez felt completely different from the three fabric sofas. Our sample measured 87.9 inches wide and 40.0 inches deep, making it the easiest to fit front to back. The unloaded seat height was 15.6 inches and dropped to 14.1 inches under a 180-pound tester, while the usable back rose only 12.4 inches above the compressed seat. Those low measurements explain the 3.7/5 back-support score. The leather surface warmed 6.4°F during a 60-minute sit, the largest rise in the group, but the tight cushion compressed only 1.4 inches and made position changes easy. Rodez earned 4.0/5 overall: it is the strongest design choice here, but not the best sofa for upright work or long movie sessions.

What we liked

• A distinctive low profile without excess visual bulk

• Tight cushions that made shifting and standing easy

• The smallest front-to-back footprint in this test

Who it is best for

• Style-focused rooms and owners who welcome leather patina

• People who lounge briefly and do not need shoulder-height support

Where it falls short

• Tall sitters and anyone who needs a higher seat or back

• Long sessions in warm rooms

Pros & Cons

Details

• Tested price: $3,799

• Tested dimensions: 88 W × 40 D × 26.5 H

• Standard sofa sizes: 88 or 105 inches

• Frame: FSC-certified engineered hardwood

• Suspension: sinuous wire

• Upholstery: Moore & Giles full-grain aniline leather

• Cushioning: tight foam-and-poly seat and back

• Legs: removable and inset

• Care: vacuum gently, limit direct sun, and use professional leather care when needed

• Returns: eligible stock furniture requires contact within 7 days and return within 30 days; made-to-order upholstery is excluded

Review Score

Faible ranked first at 4.2/5 because it paired the best seat-comfort score with the easiest cleaning and lowest heat buildup. Berkeley followed at 4.1/5 and is the better choice when a tailored profile matters. Eastman and Rodez both scored 4.0/5, but for opposite reasons: Eastman prioritizes softness and adjustable lumbar support, while Rodez emphasizes easy movement, compact depth, and leather character.

Begin with posture. Choose Faible if you recline, nap, or sit with your legs up; its depth is the main attraction and the main space penalty. Berkeley supports long lounging while keeping a sharper outline. Eastman works for people who like a softer seat and want to move lumbar pillows between relaxed and upright positions. Rodez suits shorter sessions and low-profile rooms, but its seat and back are too low for dependable laptop posture. Next match the upholstery to your tolerance for upkeep: performance fabric handled spills most easily, velvet needed brushing and lint removal, and aniline leather showed marks as part of its patina. Finally, tape the full width and depth on the floor and preserve comfortable walkways before ordering.

This review compares one tested configuration of each sofa, not every fabric, leather, or size in each collection. Cushion feel and dimensions can vary slightly in benchmade upholstery, and our durability score reflects early stability and recovery rather than years of use. Prices are the tested prices, not guaranteed current prices. Heat, cleaning, and comfort results reflect our samples and test room, so climate, body size, and fabric selection may change the experience.

Choose one of these CB2 models when you want a distinctive silhouette and upholstery that feels central to the design. Faible offers the deepest lounge, Berkeley the strongest mix of polish and plushness, Eastman the softest seat, and Rodez the most compact leather profile.

West Elm Andes: Andes is the configuration-first alternative. It offers more width, depth, cushion, and fabric combinations, and its firmer seat feels more upright than Faible, Berkeley, or Eastman. Choose it when precise room fit and customization matter more than a soft, sink-in feel.

Article Sven: Sven costs less in many fabric configurations and brings a clear mid-century look in an 88-inch footprint. Its tufted bench seat and 24-inch seat depth feel more structured and less expansive than Faible. It is the value option, but it does not match the material choices or tailored construction of every CB2 model here.

Room & Board Metro: Metro is the safest everyday alternative, with multiple sizes, two depths, a conventional 22-inch seat depth in the 88-inch version, and a hardwood frame with flexolator suspension. It lacks Rodez’s drama and Faible’s extreme depth, but it is easier to recommend for mixed sitting styles and upright conversation.

• Measure depth and walkway clearance, not just wall width. Faible needs five more inches front to back than Rodez.

• Use felt pads or appropriate floor protectors from day one, especially on hard flooring.

• For laptop work, add a firm lumbar pillow and choose Berkeley or Eastman over Rodez.

• Keep a velvet brush or lint roller nearby for Berkeley and Eastman, and brush in the direction of the nap.

• If you choose Faible, plan for a lumbar pillow or ottoman so shorter legs are not left unsupported.

• Rotate seating positions and fluff loose cushions during the first few weeks for more even break-in.

• Blot spills instead of rubbing, and test any cleaner in a hidden area first.

• Keep Rodez out of strong direct sun and accept that full-grain aniline leather will develop patina.

• Tape the sofa footprint on the floor and confirm door, stair, elevator, and corner clearances before delivery.

Faible. Its 31.8-inch usable seat depth and stable cushion made it the easiest sofa to stretch out on during our nap and movie tests.

Yes. Berkeley and Eastman both remained comfortable through two-hour movie sessions, but their velvet surfaces warmed more than Faible’s performance fabric.

The routine is simple, but the finish is not carefree. Vacuum gently, keep it away from strong sun, and expect the aniline leather to show natural marks and develop patina.

Map both sizes on the floor, then choose the smaller one unless the larger version still leaves clear walkways, side-table space, and an unobstructed delivery path.