In CB2's current sofa lineup, these four tested models fall into very different comfort lanes. Pricing still sits in the premium range, but the day-to-day feel is distinct: Faible is the deep lounger, Berkeley and Eastman are the two velvet sofas with different comfort profiles, and Rodez is the low-profile leather statement piece that looks great but is not the best fit for long upright sitting.
Table of Contents
- Which CB2 sofas did we test?
- What stood out during testing?
- How do these CB2 sofas compare?
- How did we test these CB2 sofas?
- What was it like living with each CB2 sofa?
- How do the scores compare?
- How do you choose a CB2 sofa for your space?
- What are the limitations of this review?
- How do CB2 sofas compare with alternatives?
- Practical tips before you buy a CB2 sofa
- FAQs
Which CB2 sofas did we test?
| Model | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Best For | Price (tested) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faible | 4.2 | True deep-lounge comfort; practical performance fabric | Large footprint; depth may be too much for shorter legs | Movie nights, hosting, naps | $2,299 |
| Berkeley | 4.1 | Plush but tailored; genuinely wide arms | Velvet runs warm; cushions need fluffing | Dressy-but-livable living rooms | $2,799 |
| Eastman | 4.0 | Soft classic comfort; lumbar pillows add support | Velvet shows marks; cushions feel softer | Relaxed lounging with a tailored look | $2,999 |
| Rodez | 4.0 | Low-slung statement look; leather character | Low back/seat; leather warms up over time | Style-forward rooms, shorter-depth layouts | $3,799 |
What stood out during testing?
Our hands-on testing made the differences easy to feel. Faible was the easiest sofa to stretch out on for hours. Berkeley delivered plush comfort without losing a clean, tailored look. Eastman felt softer and more relaxed, but it needed more fluffing and more velvet upkeep. Rodez had the strongest visual presence, though its low seat and back made it better for shorter lounging sessions than movie marathons.
How do these CB2 sofas compare?
| Spec | Faible | Berkeley | Eastman | Rodez |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested size | 99"W x 45"D x 29"H | 106"W x 42"D x 30"H | 105.5"W x 42"D x 31.5"H | 88"W x 40"D x 26.5"H |
| Sizes | - | 78" or 106" | 75" or 105" | 88" or 105" |
| Upholstery | Crypton performance upholstery | Performance velvet | 100% cotton velvet | Moore & Giles full-grain aniline leather |
| Seat depth | 32" seat depth (collection spec) | - | - | - |
| Cushion fill | High-density foam + polyfiber batting | High-density foam + feathers/down | High-density foam + feather-down blend; lumbar pillows | Tight cushions; foam-poly blend |
| Frame + suspension | Engineered wood; sinuous wire springs | FSC hardwood; flexolator suspension | FSC hardwood; sinuous wire springs | FSC engineered hardwood; sinuous wire suspension |
| Firmness | Medium-plush | Medium-plush | Plush | Medium-firm |
| Back support | Relaxed, lounge-first | Supportive for long movies | Best when lumbar pillows are placed well | Low-slung; posture-sensitive |
| Breathability | Coolest overall | Warmest on long sits | Warm to moderate | Warms up over time; leather can feel sticky |
| Cleaning ease | Highest (performance fabric habits) | High, though velvet still traps lint | Moderate (velvet shows marks) | Moderate (patina; needs care) |
| Layout fit | Needs room | Large but balanced | Large, classic footprint | Easiest to “fit” depth-wise |
How did we test these CB2 sofas?
Our testing put each sofa through the same routine: laptop work, TV nights, short naps, and a few rounds of hosting. We scored them using our how we test sofas framework, with separate checks for assembly and setup, cooling and breathability, comfort and ergonomics, and sofa durability, including cushion recovery and frame stability. We also tracked fabric and cleaning friction, size and layout practicality in everyday traffic flow, and overall value and warranty against materials and daily comfort.
What was it like living with each CB2 sofa?
Faible Performance Deep Depth Fabric Sofa
Our Testing Experience

In our testing, Faible was the sofa we kept coming back to when the goal was to fully unwind. The seat is deep enough for a semi-reclined posture, but it does not dump you forward as the hours pass. In everyday use—snacks, drinks, and friends dropping in—the performance fabric felt easier to live with than velvet. Even after long movie nights, the cushions stayed even and did not develop a noticeable sit spot. The trade-off is simple: this is a large sofa, and shorter loungers may want a pillow behind the back.
What we liked
-
Deep seat that stays comfortable through long stretches
-
Performance fabric feels easier to manage day to day
-
Generous seating area for hosting
Who it is best for
-
People who sprawl, nap, or host often
-
Households that want upholstery that feels easier to live with
Where it falls short
-
Tighter rooms and narrow walkways
-
Anyone who prefers a more upright sit

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Deep, lounge-first seat with a relaxed feel | Needs space; can dominate compact rooms |
| Performance fabric fits real-life use | Depth may require extra pillows for shorter legs |
| Cushions stay consistent over long sessions | Less formal, more casual profile |

Details
-
Price (tested configuration): $2,299
-
Overall dimensions (tested): 99"W x 45"D x 29"H
-
Seat depth: 32" (collection spec)
-
Frame: engineered wood
-
Suspension: hand-pulled sinuous wire spring suspension
-
Cushioning: layered high-density foam wrapped in polyfiber batting
-
Upholstery: Crypton performance upholstery
-
Cleaning notes: protective finish designed to resist stains and fading
-
Stability: anti-slip levelers included
-
Return window: contact within 7 days of delivery or pickup to arrange return within 30 days

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Setup | 4.0 | Large piece to maneuver; plan a clear path |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Coolest option for long sits versus velvet/leather |
| Seat comfort | 4.6 | Settle-in comfort without a slide-forward feel |
| Back support | 4.1 | Relaxed back; add a lumbar pillow for laptop work |
| Depth fit | 4.2 | Great for lounging; can be too deep for shorter legs |
| Repositioning | 4.0 | Easy to change positions; not a bouncy feel |
| Durability | 4.4 | Foam + suspension felt steady over time |
| Layout | 3.8 | Best in rooms that can handle 45" depth |
| Cleaning | 4.6 | Performance fabric lowers day-to-day cleaning stress |
| Value | 4.0 | Strong comfort for the size at this price |
| Overall | 4.2 | Big-lounge specialist that earns its footprint |
Berkeley Performance Velvet Sofa
Our Testing Experience

In daily use, Berkeley felt like the sofa that kept the room looking polished without giving up comfort. The seat is plush, but the outline stays tidy, and the wide arms were genuinely useful for a tray, a book, or just elbow room. In our testing, support held up well through long TV sessions, though the down-wrapped cushions did need regular fluffing. The performance velvet looks rich and is easiergoing than standard velvet, but it still runs warm and picks up lint.

What we liked
-
Plush seating with a clean, modern outline
-
Wide arms that work as real resting space
-
Performance velvet looks upscale without feeling too precious
Who it is best for
-
People who want plush comfort in a polished living room
-
Anyone who likes wide arms for trays, books, or lounging
Where it falls short
-
Hot-sitting households or warm rooms
-
People who do not want to fluff down-wrapped cushions

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Plush comfort with a tailored profile | Velvet can feel warm during long sits |
| Performance velvet adds some everyday practicality | Fluffing down-wrapped cushions is part of the routine |
| Solid frame/suspension build | Premium price for a plush look-and-feel |

Details
-
Price (tested configuration): $2,799
-
Overall dimensions (tested): 106"W x 42"D x 30"H
-
Size options: 78" or 106"
-
Frame: FSC-certified solid hardwood; kiln-dried
-
Suspension: flexolator suspension system
-
Cushioning: high-density foam cushions wrapped in feathers and down
-
Upholstery: performance velvet
-
Legs: removable recessed legs
-
Return window: contact within 7 days of delivery or pickup to arrange return within 30 days

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Setup | 4.1 | Straightforward to place; wide arms add bulk in tight entries |
| Cooling | 3.7 | Velvet retains warmth during long sessions |
| Seat comfort | 4.4 | Plush without collapsing into a “pit” feeling |
| Back support | 4.2 | Supportive for movies; best when you sit fully back |
| Depth fit | 4.0 | Comfortable for average/tall loungers; not extreme-deep |
| Repositioning | 4.2 | Easy to shift; cushions don’t trap you in one spot |
| Durability | 4.3 | Strong frame/suspension; cushions need routine care |
| Layout | 4.1 | 42" depth is big but manageable |
| Cleaning | 4.2 | Performance finish helps, but velvet shows lint |
| Value | 3.8 | Premium price for a refined plush feel |
| Overall | 4.1 | A polished-plush velvet sofa that is easy to like |
Eastman Green Velvet Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Eastman felt more like classic family-room comfort with cleaner tailoring. It was the sofa we gravitated to when everyone wanted to pile on, and the lumbar pillows made a bigger difference than we expected—move them a little and the back support changes with them. Compared with Berkeley, the cushions feel softer and benefit from occasional reshaping. The cotton velvet looks beautiful, but it shows pressure marks faster, so it rewards a gentler routine.

What we liked
-
Soft, sink-in comfort that feels relaxing right away
-
Lumbar pillows let you fine-tune support
-
Tailored details keep it looking finished
Who it is best for
-
People who want a softer lounge feel
-
Anyone willing to adjust pillows to dial in support
Where it falls short
-
If you want a set-it-and-forget-it fabric
-
Those who prefer a firmer, more upright seat

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Soft, inviting comfort profile | Velvet shows pressure marks and needs care |
| Lumbar pillows help you tune support | Softer cushions need occasional reshaping |
| Solid frame and suspension spec | Can run warm for hot sitters |

Details
-
Price (tested configuration): $2,999
-
Overall dimensions (tested): 105.5"W x 42"D x 31.5"H
-
Size options: 75" or 105"
-
Frame: FSC-certified hardwood; kiln-dried
-
Suspension: hand-pulled sinuous wire spring suspension
-
Upholstery: 100% cotton velvet
-
Seat/back cushions: high-density foam wrapped in a feather-down blend
-
Lumbar pillows: polyfiber + feather down
-
Return window: contact within 7 days of delivery or pickup to arrange return within 30 days

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Setup | 4.0 | Easy to live with once placed; size takes planning |
| Cooling | 3.6 | Velvet trends warm in long sessions |
| Seat comfort | 4.5 | Soft, welcoming, “stay longer” feel |
| Back support | 4.3 | Best when lumbar pillows are positioned well |
| Depth fit | 4.0 | Broadly comfortable; depth feels “big living-room” |
| Repositioning | 3.9 | Softer cushions can feel clingy when you shift |
| Durability | 4.1 | Strong frame/suspension; softer feel needs upkeep |
| Layout | 4.0 | Standard big-sofa footprint at 42" depth |
| Cleaning | 3.6 | Velvet rewards careful habits over quick wipe-downs |
| Value | 3.7 | Comfort is excellent, but you're paying for the feel and look |
| Overall | 4.0 | A soft, tailored velvet sofa that’s all about lounging |
Rodez Saddle Leather Apartment Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Rodez was the clearest style-first pick in our testing. The low profile and tight cushions make it look sharp immediately, and the aniline leather brings real natural variation. The trade-off is posture: both the seat and the back sit low, so it is better for relaxed conversation and shorter lounging than for long upright sessions or laptop work. Because it is aniline leather, marks and patina are part of the ownership experience rather than something you completely avoid.

What we liked
-
Low-slung silhouette that makes a strong statement
-
Tight cushions make shifting positions easy
-
Depth is easier to fit than the big loungers here
Who it is best for
-
Style-forward rooms and owners who like leather patina
-
Loungers who do not need a high back for long sessions
Where it falls short
-
Anyone who needs higher back or seat support
-
Hot sitters in warmer climates

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Striking low-profile silhouette | Low posture isn't for everyone |
| Full-grain aniline leather with natural character | Leather warms up over time and can feel sticky |
| Tight cushions make repositioning easy | Aniline leather will show marks and patina |

Details
-
Price (tested configuration): $3,799
-
Overall dimensions (tested): 88"W x 40"D x 26.5"H
-
Size options: 88" or 105"
-
Frame: FSC-certified engineered hardwood
-
Suspension: sinuous wire suspension
-
Upholstery: Moore & Giles full-grain aniline leather
-
Cushioning: tight seat/back cushions; foam-poly blend
-
Legs: removable inset legs
-
Care notes: vacuum regularly, avoid direct sun, and use professional upholstery cleaning as needed
-
Return window: contact within 7 days of delivery or pickup to arrange return within 30 days

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Setup | 4.2 | Easier footprint to maneuver; still heavy as leather |
| Cooling | 3.4 | Leather starts cool, then runs warm on long sits |
| Seat comfort | 4.0 | Supportive, but posture-sensitive due to low profile |
| Back support | 3.7 | Low-slung; best for relaxed reclining, not upright work |
| Depth fit | 3.9 | Comfortable depth, but height changes the feel |
| Repositioning | 4.3 | Tight cushions make shifting effortless |
| Durability | 4.4 | Leather and frame/suspension spec signal longevity |
| Layout | 4.2 | 40" depth is the easiest “fit” among these four |
| Cleaning | 3.9 | Wipe-friendly mindset, but aniline shows life |
| Value | 3.9 | You are paying for the silhouette and leather character |
| Overall | 4.0 | A style-first leather sofa that rewards the right posture |
How do the scores compare?
| Model | Overall Score | Seat comfort | Back support | Depth fit | Cooling | Durability | Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faible | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.0 |
| Berkeley | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| Eastman | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 3.9 |
| Rodez | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
For everyday livability, Faible and Berkeley were the easiest winners to call—Faible for sprawling out, Berkeley for plush comfort with a tidier silhouette. Eastman stayed close because it is very comfortable, but its velvet asks more of you in heat and upkeep. Rodez is the visual outlier: durable and easy to shift on, but the low-slung design pulls down back-support and cooling scores.
How do you choose a CB2 sofa for your space?
Start with how you actually sit. If you sprawl, nap, or lean back, prioritize depth and cushion stability; Faible is the clearest fit. If you sit more upright for conversation or laptop time, think about back support and how easily you can fine-tune it with pillows; Eastman makes that adjustment easy. Then match upholstery to your routine, especially if you are weighing fabric vs. leather sofas: performance fabrics are easier day to day, while velvet and aniline leather look richer but ask for more care. Before you buy, review how to buy a sofa, confirm couch dimensions, and measure a sofa in your room. Depth matters almost as much as width: Rodez is the easiest to place front-to-back, while Faible needs the most floor space.
What are the limitations of this review?
These four sofas show what CB2 does well: strong silhouettes, premium upholstery, and clear differences in feel. They also share familiar trade-offs. Velvet and leather usually run warmer and need more upkeep than performance fabrics, and the deeper profiles need more room to breathe. If you dislike deep seats, Faible will feel oversized; if your room runs warm, Berkeley and Eastman will feel warmer; and if you want easier upright posture, Rodez will feel too low.
How do CB2 sofas compare with alternatives?
-
Why choose these models
-
Modern silhouettes with premium upholstery options
-
Strong frame and suspension specs in several models
-
Clear comfort lanes: deep lounge, polished plush velvet, softer velvet, or low leather
-
-
-
West Elm Andes Sofa: similar modern presence with broader sizing options
-
Article Sven Sofa: strong value positioning with a widely available lineup
-
Room & Board Metro: a more straightforward everyday comfort profile
-
Practical tips before you buy a CB2 sofa
-
Check depth and walkway clearance, not just wall width; deep sofas can change traffic flow fast.
-
Add felt pads or sliders right away; it protects floors and can help stop a sofa from moving over time.
-
If you work from the sofa, use a dedicated lumbar pillow; a small support change beats constant posture shifting.
-
For velvet, keep a soft brush or lint roller nearby and do a quick pass after longer sits.
-
For deep seats, plan on an ottoman or footrest so you can relax without slouching.
-
Rotate where you sit during the first few weeks so break-in happens more evenly.
-
Keep a washable throw where people actually snack; it takes pressure off the upholstery and makes it easier to clean a couch after small spills.
-
For leather, limit direct sun when you can and expect patina to develop.
-
Re-check room scale and where to place your sofa; large sofas look better with a rug and tables that match their footprint.
FAQs
Which CB2 sofa is best for deep lounging and naps?
Faible. It was the clearest deep-lounge option in our testing and the easiest one to stretch out on for naps.
Are CB2 velvet sofas comfortable for long movie nights?
Yes. Berkeley and Eastman both worked well for long movie sessions in our testing, but velvet gets warmer the longer you sit.
Is the Rodez leather sofa hard to maintain?
Not difficult, but it is not carefree. The aniline leather will show natural markings and develop patina, so regular, gentle care matters.
How do I choose between the smaller and larger sizes?
Start with the seating width your household actually uses, then make sure the larger option still leaves comfortable walkways and side-table space.