Shifman Mattress sits in the luxury, hotel-style innerspring lane, with a lineup that leans into two-sided, flippable builds and traditional cushioning instead of ultra-thick foam stacks. In our tests, the biggest strengths were support consistency and edge stability, while the main drawbacks were motion transfer and a firmness feel that can run stricter than the names suggest for some sleepers.
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline 13" Ultra Firm | 4.1 | Very stable support, strong edges | Limited pressure relief for side sleepers | Back/stomach sleepers who want a firm surface |
| Helena 13" Cushion Firm | 4.1 | Balanced support with a touch more give | Still transmits some partner movement | Combo sleepers who want firm-but-not-harsh |
| Sophia 15" Plush Pillowtop | 4.0 | Plusher entry feel, flippable longevity | Feel can read firmer underneath than expected | People who want cushion without deep sink |
| Elizabeth 15" Luxury Plush Pillow Top | 4.3 | Best pressure relief and “buoyant” comfort | High price, still not “dead quiet” | Side sleepers and couples wanting luxury balance |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the four, we kept coming back to how “traditional” these felt: more lift, less sink, and a steadier midsection than many foam-forward beds. Marcus liked the firmer builds for keeping his hips from dipping, while Mia did noticeably better on the Elizabeth’s plusher, latex-and-wool approach. Jenna and Ethan preferred the Elizabeth for couple use, because it stayed calmer during turns than the tighter-top models.
Shifman Mattress Comparison Chart
| Spec / Performance | Caroline 13" Ultra Firm | Helena 13" Cushion Firm | Sophia 15" Plush Pillowtop | Elizabeth 15" Luxury Plush Pillow Top |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mattress type | Innerspring | Innerspring | Innerspring | Innerspring |
| Top style | Tight top | Tight top | Pillow top | Pillow top |
| Two-sided / flippable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Height | 13" | ~13" | ~15" | 15" |
| Coil count | 360 | 360 | 360 | 713 |
| Notable build notes | Foam layers on both sides; foam encasement | Cotton comfort layers; Mirafil fiber | Cotton layers; “luxe” foam; Mirafil fiber | Convoluted latex + NZ wool; individually wrapped coils; Sanotuft |
| Available sizes (as listed) | Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King | Twin, Full, Queen, King, Cal King | Twin XL, Queen, King, Cal King | Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, Cal King |
| Support (our tests) | Very strong, “board-stable” | Strong, slightly friendlier | Strong under a softer entry | Strong + more contouring |
| Pressure relief (our tests) | Limited for side sleeping | Moderate | Moderate-to-good | Best in group |
| Motion isolation (our tests) | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate | Best in group (still some bounce) |
| Cooling feel (our tests) | Good airflow feel | Good, less foam “stew” | Good, despite pillow top | Very good (wool/latex feel helps) |
How We Tested It
We ran each mattress through the same routine: overnight sleep in back/side/stomach mixes, edge sitting for morning routines, and longer “stillness” sessions to watch for pressure buildup. We tracked Support and Pressure Relief by checking hip/shoulder comfort and alignment over full nights, then compared Cooling by noting heat buildup after several hours. Motion Isolation came from partner turns and get-in/get-out cycles, while Responsiveness was judged by how easily we could change positions. Durability was assessed through flippability, build features, and how the surface feel held steady across repeated use.
Shifman Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Caroline 13" Ultra Firm
Our Testing Experience
The first night on Caroline, I noticed how quickly my lower back stopped “searching” for a stable spot—everything felt squared up and level. Marcus liked it immediately; he said the surface didn’t let his hips “drop and drag” when he rolled forward. Mia, on the other hand, started shifting after an hour on her side because her shoulder didn’t get much give. Sitting on the edge to put on shoes felt sturdy, not that slow slide you get on softer pillow tops. Flipping it was work, but the benefit was obvious: after a couple of weeks, it kept the same firm, clean feel instead of forming a soft groove.
What we liked:
-
Strong, steady support with very little sway
-
Edge feels reinforced when sitting and lying near the perimeter
-
Easy to move on; no “stuck” feeling
Who it is best for:
-
Back sleepers who want a firm, flat surface
-
Stomach sleepers who need hip control
-
People who prefer a traditional, spring-supported feel
Where it falls short:
-
Side sleepers with sensitive shoulders/hips may feel pressure sooner
-
Light sleepers may notice partner movement more than on foam-heavy beds
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very stable support | Pressure relief is limited for side sleeping |
| Strong edge structure | Motion isolation is only moderate |
| Flippable design helps long-term feel | Firm feel can be too strict for some |
Details
-
Price (Queen, listed): $1,997
-
Mattress type: innerspring
-
Top style: tight top
-
Height: 13"
-
Two-sided / flippable: yes
-
Coil count: 360
-
Edge support feature: high-density foam encasement
-
Cover: silk finished Damask cover
-
Adjustable base compatible: yes
-
Warranty: 10-year non-prorated
-
Available sizes (as listed): Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.8 | Extremely stable under hips and lumbar for back/stomach sleep |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Breathes like a classic innerspring; less foam heat retention |
| Pressure Relief | 3.2 | Shoulder/hip pressure builds for side sleepers |
| Motion Isolation | 3.4 | Springs transmit some movement during turns |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Easy to change positions; quick rebound |
| Edge Support | 4.6 | Noticeably reinforced during sitting and edge sleep |
| Durability | 4.2 | Two-sided build supports longer-term surface consistency |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Best for firm-support shoppers who don’t need deep cushioning |
Helena 13" Cushion Firm
Our Testing Experience
Helena felt like the “manager’s cut” of firm: still controlled, but less punishing in the first few minutes. I could read in bed without feeling like my hips were perched on top of the mattress, and the surface didn’t collapse when I shifted my weight. Marcus still got the support he wanted, and he noticed the edge stayed confident during sit-and-stand mornings. Mia did better here than on Caroline—she could stay on her side longer before that shoulder pinch showed up, though it wasn’t a full-on plush cradle. The cotton comfort layers and Mirafil fiber gave a slightly loftier hand-feel, and flipping it helped keep the feel even from week to week.
What we liked:
-
Firm alignment with a friendlier entry feel
-
Edge stays stable during daily sitting
-
Flippable design keeps the surface from feeling “one-sided worn”
Who it is best for:
-
Combo sleepers who rotate between back and side
-
People who want firm support without an overly rigid top
-
Hot sleepers who dislike thick foam warmth
Where it falls short:
-
Side sleepers needing deep shoulder sink may still want more cushion
-
Motion isolation remains only mid-pack for couples
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Balanced firm feel | Not plush enough for many sensitive side sleepers |
| Cotton layers add comfort without mush | Partner motion is still noticeable |
| Strong edge structure | Firm fans may still prefer Caroline’s stricter surface |
Details
-
Price (Queen, listed): $2,297
-
Mattress type: innerspring
-
Top style: tight top
-
Height: ~13"
-
Two-sided / flippable: yes
-
Cotton comfort layers noted in build
-
Mirafil fiber noted in build
-
Coil count: 360
-
Edge support feature: high-density foam encasement
-
Cover: silk finished Damask cover
-
Warranty: 10-year non-prorated
-
Available sizes (as listed): Twin, Full, Queen, King, Cal King
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.6 | Strong alignment with slightly more surface compliance |
| Cooling | 4.3 | Cotton layers + innerspring airflow stay comfortable overnight |
| Pressure Relief | 3.6 | Improved over ultra-firm, still not deeply contouring |
| Motion Isolation | 3.5 | Some transfer during partner turns |
| Responsiveness | 4.1 | Moves easily; steady rebound without bounce overload |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | Reliable when sitting and when sleeping near the edge |
| Durability | 4.2 | Two-sided build supports longer wear patterns |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | The most versatile “firm” option of the tighter-top models |
Sophia 15" Plush Pillowtop
Our Testing Experience
Sophia started with that classic pillowtop “ahh” when you first sit down—there’s a cushiony layer that softens the landing. But once I settled in, the support core felt more serious than the name suggests, which I actually appreciated for keeping my hips level. Jenna and Ethan focused on motion: when Ethan did his usual restless turn-and-reset routine, the surface wasn’t dead quiet, but it also didn’t ripple like some bouncier spring beds. Mia liked the initial plushness, yet she still needed a careful pillow position to keep her shoulder comfortable through a full side-sleep stretch. Over time, I found Sophia best when I wanted cushion without losing the “lift” of a traditional innerspring.
What we liked:
-
Cushioned entry feel without deep sink
-
Flippable design keeps pillowtop feel more consistent over time
-
Easy to turn and reposition
Who it is best for:
-
Back sleepers who want a softer top but stable support
-
Combo sleepers who dislike slow foam response
-
Couples who want some cushion without an overly soft surface
Where it falls short:
-
Very sensitive side sleepers may still chase more pressure relief
-
Light sleepers may notice partner movement during frequent turning
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Softer landing than tight-top models | Not the quietest option for motion isolation |
| Still supportive under hips and lumbar | “Plush” may feel firmer than expected for some |
| Flippable for longer-term consistency | Side sleepers may need added cushioning (topper/pillows) |
Details
-
Price (Queen, listed): $2,897
-
Mattress type: innerspring
-
Top style: pillow top
-
Height: ~15"
-
Two-sided / flippable: yes
-
Cotton comfort layers noted in build
-
Mirafil fiber noted in build
-
Coil count: 360
-
Warranty: 10-year non-prorated
-
Available sizes (as listed): Twin XL, Queen, King, Cal King
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.3 | Support core feels steady even with a plusher top |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Breathes well for a pillowtop, avoids “foam stew” |
| Pressure Relief | 3.9 | Better shoulder/hip comfort than tight tops, not deeply plush |
| Motion Isolation | 3.6 | Calmer than classic bouncy beds, still some transfer |
| Responsiveness | 3.8 | Slightly slower on top, but still easy to move on |
| Edge Support | 4.3 | Holds shape well near the perimeter |
| Durability | 4.0 | Flippable helps; pillowtop feel can be more variable long-term |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Best if you want cushion with a still-supportive backbone |
Elizabeth 15" Luxury Plush Pillow Top
Our Testing Experience
Elizabeth felt like the most “complete” build the moment I laid down: there’s a gentle plushness, but it pushes back with a buoyant, supported feel instead of letting you sink. Mia had the best side-sleep nights of the entire group on this one—less shoulder complaining, fewer mid-night repositions. Jenna and Ethan liked it most for shared sleep because it stayed composed when Ethan drifted toward the edge and then rolled back; the foam encasement helped the perimeter feel usable, not decorative. I also noticed the temperature regulation felt more even—less of that warm spot developing under my torso. Dr. Walker’s general guidance lined up with what we felt: a mattress that balances contouring with lift tends to reduce the “hips low, shoulders high” problem for combo sleepers.
What we liked:
-
Best blend of contouring and support in the lineup
-
More even temperature feel through the night
-
Strong, usable edge for couples
Who it is best for:
-
Side sleepers wanting pressure relief without deep sink
-
Couples needing stable edges and calmer movement
-
Combo sleepers who want buoyant support
Where it falls short:
-
Premium price point is significant
-
People seeking ultra-soft, deep hug may still want more sink
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong pressure relief with buoyant support | Expensive compared with the other three |
| Wool/latex style feel stays more temperature-even | Not “memory-foam quiet” for motion |
| High coil count and reinforced edges feel substantial | May feel too supportive for ultra-plush fans |
Details
-
Price (Queen, listed): $4,397
-
Mattress type: innerspring
-
Top style: pillow top
-
Height: 15"
-
Two-sided / flippable: yes
-
Convoluted latex noted in build
-
New Zealand wool noted in build
-
Individually wrapped coils noted in build
-
Coil count: 713
-
Sanotuft technique noted in build
-
Edge support feature: high-density foam encasement
-
Warranty: 10-year non-prorated
-
Available sizes (as listed): Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, Cal King
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.6 | Excellent alignment with a more adaptive surface |
| Cooling | 4.5 | Most temperature-even feel in the group |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3 | Best shoulder/hip comfort for side sleeping |
| Motion Isolation | 3.9 | Calmer than the others, still some spring movement |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Buoyant and easy to turn; no “stuck” transitions |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | Strong perimeter for sitting and couple edge use |
| Durability | 4.3 | Substantial build features + two-sided design support longevity |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | The top pick if budget allows and you want the best balance |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness | Edge Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caroline 13" Ultra Firm | 4.1 | 4.8 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.6 |
| Helena 13" Cushion Firm | 4.1 | 4.6 | 3.6 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.5 |
| Sophia 15" Plush Pillowtop | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.3 |
| Elizabeth 15" Luxury Plush Pillow Top | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.5 |
The most even performer is Elizabeth: it avoids weak spots by pairing high support and strong pressure relief with the best cooling scores. Caroline is the specialist—excellent support and edges, but a clear pressure-relief shortcoming for side sleepers. Helena sits in the middle as the most flexible “firm” daily driver. Sophia offers the cushiest entry feel, but its advantage is more about comfort texture than a major leap in motion isolation.
How to Choose the Shifman Mattress?
Start with sleep position and tolerance for firmness. If you’re mostly back/stomach, Caroline delivers the cleanest hip control. If you rotate between back and side, Helena is the safer firm pick. If you want cushion on top but still dislike slow foam, Sophia fits best. If you’re a side sleeper, a couple sharing the bed, or you want the most balanced luxury feel, Elizabeth is the strongest choice—especially if you run pressure-sensitive at shoulders and hips.
Limitations
These mattresses skew “traditional”: more lift than hug, and you’ll usually feel more partner movement than on foam-dominant designs. The tight-top models can feel too strict for sensitive side sleepers, while the pillowtop options still won’t satisfy people who want a deep, sinking plush. The flippable builds add maintenance effort, since rotating and flipping matters for keeping the feel consistent.
Shifman Mattress Vs. Alternatives
-
Why choose these models
-
Two-sided, flippable construction for longer-term surface consistency
-
Strong edge engineering across the lineup (foam encasements show up repeatedly in the builds)
-
Luxury, craft-leaning positioning from a long-standing manufacturer
-
-
Alternatives to consider
-
Stearns & Foster Estate Collection: a luxury innerspring approach that emphasizes premium comfort layers and airflow-focused construction.
-
Beautyrest Black: positioned around individualized support and motion separation in a luxury coil system.
-
Saatva Classic: a luxury innerspring alternative with a long home trial and white-glove delivery model.
-
Pro Tips for Shifman Mattress
-
Flip on a consistent schedule early on to keep the surface feel even (two-sided builds reward routine).
-
Use a breathable protector; don’t smother the airflow with a thick, non-breathable encasement.
-
If you’re side-sleep sensitive, test pillow height first—neck angle can decide whether “firm” feels supportive or punishing.
-
For couples, prioritize a sturdier bed frame; a wobbly base amplifies motion transfer.
-
If you sit on the edge daily, rotate the mattress so the same perimeter section doesn’t take all the load.
-
For the tight-top models, consider a thin topper only if you need a small pressure-relief boost; keep it minimal to preserve support.
-
Keep bedroom temperature and bedding weight consistent during your trial period so you can judge cooling fairly.
-
If you use an adjustable base, confirm compatibility before setup and avoid bending the mattress during moves.
-
When breaking in a pillowtop, walk-crawl gently across the surface (not bouncing) to settle initial loft evenly.
FAQs
Do these Shifman models feel “true to name” on firmness?
In our experience, the tight-top models matched their names closely, while the pillowtops felt cushy on contact but still supportive underneath, which can read firmer than expected for some sleepers.
Which model worked best for side sleeping?
Elizabeth performed best for side sleeping because it combined plush comfort with buoyant support, reducing shoulder and hip pressure without letting the midsection sag.
Are these good for couples who wake easily?
They are not the quietest category. Elizabeth did the best job staying composed during turns, but couples who need very low motion transfer may prefer a foam-forward design.
Is flipping actually worth the effort?
Yes, if you’re trying to keep the feel consistent over time. The two-sided construction is one of the clearest practical advantages in this lineup.