Havertys’ sofa lineup spans everything from power-reclining motion pieces to more traditional silhouettes. After rotating four sofas through real daily use, the biggest differences showed up in support, how much you sink in, and how easy each one is to live with. Below is a quick comparison, followed by our hands-on notes, best-use cases, and the trade-offs worth knowing before you order.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ava Sofa | 4.2 | Power recline flexibility, strong neck/back adjustability, premium feel | Needs space/weight management, can run warm | Media-room lounging, posture changers, long TV sessions |
| Taylor 3 Seat Sofa | 4.1 | Balanced sit, reversible cushions, easy-care feel | Chenille can trap heat, not a “sink-in” plush sofa | All-purpose living rooms, mixed sitting styles |
| Nikki Sofa | 4.0 | Durable fabric blend, compact footprint, steady support | Less “hugging” back feel, smaller overall scale | Apartments, tidy layouts, everyday sitting |
| Sandy Sofa | 3.9 | Classic lounge comfort, reversible cushions, inviting silhouette | Softer lumbar feel, edges soften with long use | Traditional rooms, softer seating, and relaxed lounging |
Testing Team Takeaways
Ava was the most adjustable of the group—power headrests and footrests made it easy to dial in a comfortable angle for long TV sessions. Sandy delivered the softest, most traditional “sink-in” feel, but it was the first to let posture slip during extended sitting. Taylor felt like the most balanced option: supportive enough for upright sitting, still comfortable for casual lounging, and low-fuss to maintain. Nikki came across as the practical pick with a durable fabric blend and a tidy footprint that stayed presentable during everyday use. Most buyers will end up choosing between power adjustability, steadier support, or a softer lounge feel.
Havertys Comparison Chart
| Comparison Item | Ava Sofa | Sandy Sofa | Taylor 3 Seat Sofa | Nikki Sofa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Current price | $2,349.99 | $1,149.99 | $1,399.99 | $1,349.99 |
| Overall dimensions | 80W x 41H x 41D | 90W x 38H x 39D | 88W x 37H x 38D | 80.5W x 34.6H x 38D |
| Seat height | 20 | - | 18 | 20 |
| Seat depth | - | - | 23 | 23 |
| Upholstery | Microfiber fabric (100% polyester); top-grain leather options available | 100% polyester | 100% polyester chenille | 58% olefin, 42% polyester |
| Cushion build (verified) | 2.0-density foam core + 2.5-density topper | Reversible 1.8-density foam seat cushions | Reversible 1.8-density seat cushions; fiber-filled reversible back cushions | Loose 1.8-density seat cushions; attached back cushions |
| Core comfort feel (tested) | Adjustable, supportive “dial-in” comfort | Cozy, relaxed, softer posture | Even, medium support with clear posture | Steady, practical support with less sink |
| Cooling / breathability (tested) | Moderate; power lounging can run warm | Moderate; fabric holds warmth | Moderate-low; chenille feels warmer | Moderate-good; fabric blend felt airier |
| Cleaning (tested) | Good day-to-day wipe/spot clean feel | Good via reversible cushions | Good; “easy to clean” feel in use | Very good; durable fabric behavior |
| Layout practicality (tested) | Best for dedicated seating zones | Works in classic living rooms | Flexible all-purpose placement | Best for tighter footprints |
How We Tested It
Each sofa spent time in our normal rotation—TV nights, reading, laptop work, quick naps, and routine spot-cleaning. We scored comfort and support, heat buildup, fabric and cleaning behavior, durability cues, layout practicality, and overall value. The goal wasn’t a five-minute showroom sit; it was to see how the cushions and back support held up after repeat sessions and frequent position changes.
Havertys: Our Testing Experience
Ava Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Ava lived in our media-room spot where we tend to stay planted for long stretches. The power headrest and footrest adjustments did more than just “feel nice”—they cut down on constant pillow reshuffling and helped keep our neck angle comfortable while reclined. The seat stayed supportive through long sessions, which made it easier to change positions without feeling like you had to “reset” your posture every time. The trade-off is practical: it’s heavy, it needs real floor space, and you’ll want a nearby outlet. If you want comfort you can fine-tune on demand, Ava was the clear standout.
What we liked
-
Strong comfort range thanks to power adjustments and head/foot positioning
-
Support held up across long sessions without the “slide-forward” feeling
-
Built-in charging was genuinely convenient in daily use
Who it is best for
-
People who shift positions a lot and want comfort to follow them
-
TV-focused rooms where you want consistent neck/back support
Where it falls short
-
Needs planning for placement and movement (size/weight and power setup)
-
Cooling is only average during extended lounging
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Power adjustability supports long sessions | Space planning needed for best use |
| Strong head/neck support feel | Moderate heat retention in long lounging |
| Premium cushion structure | Higher price tier |
Details
- Price: $2,349.99
-
Overall dimensions: 80W x 41H x 41D
-
Seat height: 20
-
Upholstery (tested configuration): microfiber fabric; fabric content 100% polyester
-
Cushion construction: 2.0-density foam core seat cushions with a 2.5-density topper
-
Recline features: infinite reclining positions; double power headrests and footrests
-
Charging: USB ports
-
Springs/support: crafted with no-sag springs
-
Weight: 227 lbs
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.0 | Straightforward once placed, but heavy and power-oriented |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.6 | Comfortable, but long lounging runs warm |
| Seat Comfort | 4.7 | Plush without collapsing into a saggy sit |
| Back Support | 4.6 | Adjustability kept my posture consistent |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | Flexible enough across body types with recline help |
| Durability | 4.4 | Cushion structure stayed consistent over repeat sessions |
| Cleaning | 4.2 | Day-to-day upkeep felt manageable |
| Layout Practicality | 4.0 | Best when you can dedicate space to it |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.4 | Repositioning felt effortless because the sofa “moves with you” |
| Value | 4.0 | Expensive, but performance justified the spend |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Strongest overall performer in this set |
Sandy Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Sandy is the most “sink-in” sofa in this lineup. The cushions and pillows lean cozy and traditional, which made it a great fit for casual conversations, reading, and laid-back hosting. That softer feel comes with a predictable downside: over a long sit, it’s easier to settle into a slouch, so it’s not the best match if you need consistent lumbar support. If your priority is an inviting, classic sofa that feels comfortable right away, Sandy delivers.
What we liked
-
Inviting, classic lounge comfort that works for everyday living
-
Reversible cushions helped keep wear more even
-
Traditional silhouette suited a lot of room styles
Who it is best for
-
People who prioritize cozy lounging over structured posture
-
Homes that want a classic, rolled-arm look
Where it falls short
-
Softer lumbar feel for long upright sitting
-
Edge feel softens during frequent perch-sitting
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Comfortable, classic lounge feel | Less structured lumbar support |
| Reversible cushions aid longevity | Edges soften with repeated edge use |
| Easy, traditional styling | Cooling is only average |
Details
- Price: $1,149.99
-
Overall dimensions: 90W x 38H x 39D
-
Fabric content: 100% polyester
-
Cushion construction: loose, reversible 1.8-density foam seat cushions; loose, reversible back cushions
-
Toss pillows: two feather-filled toss pillows
-
Seating system: crafted with an independent seating system
-
Weight: 194 lbs
-
Collection notes: eco-foam cushioning; proudly made in the USA
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.4 | Simple setup and easy day-one usability |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.6 | Comfortable, but fabric warmth builds over long sessions |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Great lounging comfort without feeling overly stiff |
| Back Support | 3.4 | Softer back feel; I needed extra lumbar support sooner |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.7 | Lounge-friendly, but less ideal for shorter legs |
| Durability | 3.6 | Held up well, but edge/softness changes were more noticeable |
| Cleaning | 4.0 | Reversible cushions made real-life mess management easier |
| Layout Practicality | 4.1 | Classic footprint that fits many rooms |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.9 | Comfortable to shift on, but less “locked-in” support |
| Value | 4.2 | Strong comfort and style for the price |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | Best for classic comfort, not posture-first sitting |
Taylor 3 Seat Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Taylor took the main living-room position where we bounce between laptop work and TV. It felt like the most predictable sit: the seat holds you up instead of letting your hips drift forward, and the edge support stayed steady when perching on the cushion. A few testers liked that the back cushions stayed supportive without pushing their head forward. The lower seat height gives it a more grounded feel than a perched one. It isn’t the plushest option here, but it stayed consistently comfortable across the widest range of daily use.
What we liked
-
Balanced, steady comfort that works across many sitting styles
-
Reversible cushions helped keep the feel consistent over time
-
“Easy to clean” chenille behavior in real daily life
Who it is best for
-
People who want one sofa for work, TV, and hosting
-
Anyone sensitive to posture drift on softer seats
Where it falls short
-
Chenille can feel warmer during long sessions
-
Not as plush as a dedicated lounge sofa
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Predictable support for long sitting | Warmer fabric feel in extended use |
| Reversible seat and back cushions | Less “plush sink” than lounge-first sofas |
| Flexible, all-purpose comfort |
Details
- Price: $1,399.99
-
Overall dimensions: 88W x 37H x 38D
-
Seat height: 18; seat depth: 23
-
Fabric: textured chenille; fabric content 100% polyester
-
Cushions: reversible fiber-filled back cushions; reversible 1.8-density seat cushions
-
Inside width: 72; weight: 140 lbs
-
Customization: available in many fabric choices
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.5 | Minimal hassle and no power requirements |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.6 | Comfortable, but chenille held warmth in long sits |
| Seat Comfort | 4.0 | Medium-comfort sit that stayed consistent |
| Back Support | 4.2 | Kept posture stable with fewer mid-back complaints |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | Worked well across testers without forcing a slouch |
| Durability | 3.8 | Good hold-up, with expected softening over time |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | Everyday upkeep felt easier than it looked |
| Layout Practicality | 4.2 | Easy to place and versatile for mixed-use rooms |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.1 | Smooth position changes without “getting stuck” |
| Value | 4.4 | Strong performance for the price point |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Most balanced “one-sofa-for-everything” option |
Nikki Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Nikki is the “behaves itself” sofa—clean lines, an easy footprint, and cushions that kept their shape without much fuss. In daily use, the fabric blend resisted that quick-wear look you can get with softer weaves, and spot-cleaning felt straightforward. The seat is supportive enough for everyday sitting, but the back doesn’t have the same hugging, sink-in feel as plusher designs. If you want a practical sofa that looks tidy with minimal maintenance, Nikki is a strong choice.
What we liked
-
Durable fabric blend that handled daily living well
-
Support stayed steady through frequent sit cycles
-
Compact width felt easier to fit in real rooms
Who it is best for
-
Smaller spaces and households that want a tidy footprint
-
Buyers who prioritize practicality over “ultra-plush” feel
Where it falls short
-
Less contouring back feel than the best loungers
-
Not the most “sink-in” seat comfort of the group
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Durable, practical fabric blend | Less “hugging” back feel |
| Compact footprint | Not ultra-plush |
| Consistent day-to-day support |
Details
- Price: $1,349.99
-
Overall dimensions: 80.5W x 34.6H x 38D
-
Seat height: 20; seat depth: 23
-
Fabric content: 58% olefin, 42% polyester
-
Cushions: loose 1.8-density seat cushions; attached back cushions
-
Construction notes: crafted with hardwood solids; independent seating; feather-filled pillows
-
Leg height: 3.5; arm height: 24; inside width: 70; weight: 161 lbs
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.5 | Simple to live with from day one |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0 | Fabric felt less heat-trappy in extended use |
| Seat Comfort | 3.8 | Comfortable, but not a “deep plush lounge” seat |
| Back Support | 3.7 | Solid support, less upper-back contouring |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.2 | Easy fit across body sizes for daily sitting |
| Durability | 4.0 | Stayed composed across frequent sit cycles |
| Cleaning | 4.1 | Fabric behaved well with routine upkeep |
| Layout Practicality | 4.1 | One of the easiest to place in tighter rooms |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.0 | Easy to shift positions without sinking |
| Value | 4.0 | Practical performance at a fair price |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Best “reliable daily driver” for smaller footprints |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ava Sofa | 4.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Taylor 3 Seat Sofa | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 4.1 |
| Nikki Sofa | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Sandy Sofa | 3.9 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.9 |
The numbers tell a clean story: Ava is the best all-around when you want adjustable comfort and strong support, while Taylor is the most even performer for mixed daily use. Nikki wins on practicality (especially cooling and footprint) but gives up some “sink-in” seat luxury. Sandy is the most lounge-friendly, yet its softer back support shows up clearly in the scoring.
How to Choose a Havertys Sofa?
Start with how you actually sit most days. If you lounge for long stretches and like to change positions, a motion sofa like Ava can make a real difference. If you mostly sit upright or work on the couch, look for a steadier seat and better back support (Taylor stood out here). Prefer a softer, classic sit for reading and relaxed hosting? Sandy leans that direction. And if you want something practical—easy to keep looking tidy, with durable fabric—Nikki is the safest bet. From there, measure your room, confirm the depth works for your preferred posture, and choose the upholstery that fits your household (kids, pets, or both).
Limitations
Our testing reflects hands-on, real-life use over a limited window. We can judge comfort, usability, and short-term fabric behavior, but long-term wear (multi-year cushion recovery, frame noise, and fabric aging) takes more time than any single review can cover. If durability is your top concern, treat the scores as directionally helpful and prioritize material and construction details that tend to hold up over years.
Havertys Vs. Alternatives
-
Why choose these models
-
Broad range from classic silhouettes to feature-heavy power seating
-
Cushion builds and reversible options support real daily wear
-
A short reselect/cancellation window can reduce buyer’s remorse if comfort isn’t right
-
-
Alternatives to consider
-
La-Z-Boy Trouper Power Reclining Sofa: strong recline-and-headrest comfort for TV-first households
-
West Elm Harmony Sofa: deep-seat lounging focus for sprawling comfort
-
IKEA KIVIK: washable-cover practicality and a value-forward approach
-
Pro Tips for Havertys
-
Measure more than just the wall: check doorways, stair turns, elevator depth, and the path to the room before you commit.
-
If you want to sit upright (or have back sensitivity), prioritize models with steadier seat support and stronger back structure over softer, deeper cushions.
-
Plan your layout for motion pieces: leave clearance behind the sofa, and make sure you have convenient access to power for daily use.
-
For power sofas, plan outlet access so cords don’t cross walk paths.
-
Use a fabric-safe spot-clean routine early; waiting until stains “set” is what makes cleaning feel impossible.
-
If you run warm, avoid thick throws on chenille during long sessions; they trap heat fast.
-
For hosting, keep a slim lumbar pillow nearby—one well-placed pillow can stabilize posture on softer backs.
-
If you perch-sit on the edge often, choose the model that feels most stable at the front edge (Taylor/Nikki in our testing).
-
Treat “perfect in the showroom” as a starting point—aim for the posture you use at hour two, not minute five.
FAQs
Which Havertys sofa felt best for back support during long TV nights?
Ava and Taylor were the easiest to stay comfortable on for longer sessions. Ava wins if you want to recline and still keep your head and neck supported thanks to the powered adjustments. Taylor is the better pick if you prefer a more traditional, upright sit with steady cushioning.
Which model worked best for a smaller living room?
Nikki is the easiest fit in tighter spaces. Its proportions read clean and compact, and the cushions stayed neat without needing constant fluffing. If you’re working with limited floor space, it’s the least “room-dominating” option of the four.
If I overheat on fabric sofas, which one is the safest bet here?
Nikki ran the coolest in our testing. The fabric blend felt a bit airier than the others, and it didn’t trap warmth as quickly during longer sits. The other models were closer to average for heat buildup—especially if you lounge in the same position for a while.
Which sofa is most “curl-up friendly”?
Sandy is the coziest for curling up. The softer, plusher feel makes it easy to sink in with a book or blanket. Just keep in mind that the same softness that feels cozy can be less supportive if you’re sitting for a long time.
How strict is the reselect/cancellation window?
Havertys offers a three-day reselect or cancellation window. In practice, that means you have three days after delivery or pickup to decide whether the color, comfort, or quality works for you—fees and category limits can apply. If you think you might be on the fence, plan to spend time with the sofa right away once it arrives.
