Havertys sells everything from traditional fabric sofas to powered recliners, but the three models we tested serve very different rooms. Ava is the clear choice for adjustable support, Taylor is the most useful all-purpose sofa, and Sandy is the one to buy for a softer, more relaxed sit. Our comparison below focuses on what changed after the showroom impression wore off: posture, heat, cleanup, and how easily each sofa fit into daily life.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ava Sofa | 4.2 | Powered head and foot support; firm, resilient cushions; USB charging | Expensive; heavy; requires power and recline clearance; holds heat | Media rooms, long TV sessions, and people who change positions often |
| Taylor 3 Seat Sofa | 4.1 | Stable medium-firm seat; reversible cushions; strong everyday value | Chenille warms up; too structured for a deep, soft lounge | Shared living rooms, upright sitting, laptop work, and regular hosting |
| Sandy Sofa | 3.9 | Soft seat; reversible cushions; classic rolled-arm design | Needs more lumbar help; edges soften during long sessions | Reading, relaxed conversation, casual hosting, and curl-up comfort |
Testing Team Takeaways
Ava won for long-session support because its powered headrest and footrest let us change posture without giving up neck support. Taylor was easier to recommend for a main living room: its 18-inch seat height, firm edge, and reversible cushions worked for upright conversation, laptop use, and casual TV. Sandy felt best during the first few minutes and was the easiest sofa to curl up on, but its softer back made an extra lumbar pillow useful during longer upright sessions. If you want one answer, choose Ava for powered lounging, Taylor for mixed daily use, and Sandy for softness.
Havertys Comparison Chart
| Item | Ava Sofa | Sandy Sofa | Taylor 3 Seat Sofa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price checked Aug. 19, 2026 | $3,529.99 sale / $3,999.99 regular for displayed leather version | $1,399.99 before possible cart savings | $1,399.99 sale / $1,599.99 regular |
| Dimensions (in.) | 80 W × 41 H × 41 D | 90 W × 38 H × 39 D | 88 W × 37 H × 38 D |
| Seat height | 20 in. | Not listed | 18 in. |
| Seat depth | Not listed | Not listed | 23 in. |
| Upholstery | Fabric and leather options; we tested a polyester microfiber version | 100% polyester on the ready-to-order version | 100% polyester textured chenille on the ready-to-order version |
| Cushions | Attached 2.0-density foam cores with 2.5-density toppers | Loose, reversible 1.8-density seats and reversible backs | Reversible 1.8-density seats and fiber-filled reversible backs |
| Tested feel | Supportive and highly adjustable | Soft, relaxed, and less posture-focused | Medium-firm and stable |
| Cooling | Average; warmth builds while reclined | Average; body heat lingers in the soft cushions | Average; chenille feels warm during long sits |
| Cleaning | Straightforward spot care on our fabric sample | Reversible cushions simplify routine upkeep | Spills lifted cleanly, though the weave holds lint |
| Room fit | Narrowest, but needs power and 6 in. of wall clearance | Widest; best with a full living-room wall | Most flexible overall footprint |
How We Tested It
We rotated each sofa through reading, laptop work, conversation, two-hour TV sessions, short naps, edge sitting, and routine spot cleaning. We measured the delivered footprint and seat geometry, tracked cushion compression and one-minute recovery, noted surface-temperature change during long sits, and checked for cushion shift or new noise after repeated use. Scores use a consistent 5-point scale for assembly, cooling, seat comfort, back support, seat-depth fit, short-term durability, cleaning, layout, movement, and value. The overall score is the rounded average of those categories, not a manufacturer or customer-review rating.
Havertys: Our Testing Experience
Ava Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Ava was the sofa we chose for long TV sessions. The powered headrest supported the base of the skull without forcing the chin forward, and the footrest made small changes in hip and knee angle easy. In our recline checks, the footrest took about 13 seconds to extend and 11 seconds to close. Sound peaked near 47 dB in a quiet room, low enough that it never competed with normal TV volume. The mechanism still moved cleanly after 100 open-and-close cycles.
The seat also recovered well. Our center cushion compressed about 1.4 inches under load and regained roughly 90% of that height within one minute. After a two-hour sit, the microfiber surface was 7.1°F warmer than its starting temperature, which matches its 3.6/5 cooling score. The real cost is space and logistics: the sofa weighs 227 pounds, needs an outlet, and the manufacturer calls for 6 inches behind it to recline fully. The current online default is leather, while our test unit used a polyester microfiber; price and feel will change with the upholstery.
What we liked
-
The powered headrest and footrest kept the neck, hips, and knees supported through long sessions.
-
The cushions combined a soft top layer with enough resistance to prevent a forward slide.
-
The USB port was useful because the sofa already had to sit near an outlet.
Who it is best for
-
People who watch TV for long stretches and frequently adjust their sitting position.
-
Anyone who wants powered neck and leg support without buying separate recliners.
-
Rooms with a planned outlet, clear cord path, and enough space behind the sofa.
Where it falls short
-
The weight and power cord make rearranging the room harder.
-
Heat builds under the legs and back during extended reclining.
-
Its current displayed price is more than twice the price of Sandy or Taylor.

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Precise head and foot adjustment | Needs power and wall clearance |
| Excellent seat and back support | Heavy and difficult to move |
| Cushions recover quickly | Warm and expensive |

Details
- Price checked Aug. 19, 2026: $3,529.99 sale / $3,999.99 regular for the displayed leather version
-
Dimensions: 80 W × 41 H × 41 D in.
-
Seat height: 20 in.
-
Tested upholstery: 100% polyester microfiber; current fabric and leather choices vary
-
Seats: three attached 2.0-density foam cores with 2.5-density toppers
-
Motion: infinite power recline with two powered headrests and footrests
-
Charging: USB port
-
Support: no-sag springs
-
Weight: 227 lb.; wall clearance: 6 in.

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.0 | Little setup, but the 227-pound frame is hard to place |
| Cooling | 3.6 | The surface gained 7.1°F during a two-hour sit |
| Seat Comfort | 4.7 | Soft top layer with controlled compression |
| Back Support | 4.6 | Powered head support worked across recline angles |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | Recline helps, but the fixed seat geometry will not suit everyone |
| Durability | 4.4 | No looseness or new noise after 100 motion cycles |
| Cleaning | 4.2 | Our microfiber sample released the test spill without a ring |
| Layout | 4.0 | Only 80 inches wide, but power and clearance complicate placement |
| Repositioning | 4.4 | Powered adjustments make posture changes easy while seated |
| Value | 4.0 | The features are useful, but the price is high |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Best in this group for adjustable long-session support |
Sandy Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Sandy gave us the softest first sit. Its loose back cushions, 1.8-density seat foam, feather-filled pillows, and padded rolled arms made reading and relaxed conversation easy. Under the same load used on the other sofas, the center of the seat compressed about 2.1 inches and the front edge 1.6 inches. That extra give explains the 4.2/5 comfort score, but it also made the pelvis roll back sooner during upright sitting.
After an hour, several testers wanted a small lumbar pillow. The cushion regained about 82% of its lost height after one minute, slower than Ava, and the edge felt softer after repeated perch sitting. Cleanup was simpler than the plush shape suggests: our water-based test spill lifted in three blotting passes without a visible ring, and both seat and back cushions can be reversed. Sandy is the right choice when immediate softness matters more than firm posture control.
What we liked
-
The soft seat, loose back, and padded rolled arms made it the easiest sofa for curling up.
-
Reversible seat and back cushions let us spread wear and hide a minor spot.
-
The classic Lawson-style profile worked naturally in a traditional living room.
Who it is best for
-
Readers, casual hosts, and anyone who usually sits with a leg tucked underneath.
-
People who prefer a soft landing and are willing to add lumbar support when needed.
-
Rooms with enough wall space for its 90-inch width and rolled arms.
Where it falls short
-
The soft back allows more slouching during work or long upright sessions.
-
The front edge loses firmness sooner than Taylor's when used as a perch.
-
The wide frame is harder to fit than its relaxed appearance suggests.

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Softest seat in the group | Needs extra lumbar support |
| Reversible seats and backs | Front edge softens under repeated use |
| Inviting rolled-arm design | Wide 90-inch frame |

Details
- Price checked Aug. 19, 2026: $1,399.99 before possible cart savings
-
Dimensions: 90 W × 38 H × 39 D in.
-
Ready-to-order upholstery: 100% polyester; custom options available
-
Seats: loose, reversible 1.8-density foam cushions
-
Backs: loose and reversible
-
Pillows: two feather-filled toss pillows
-
Support: independent seating system
-
Weight: 194 lb.

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.4 | Ready quickly once the 194-pound frame was in place |
| Cooling | 3.6 | The soft cushions retained warmth during long sits |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | The most inviting initial sit in the group |
| Back Support | 3.4 | A lumbar pillow helped during upright use |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.7 | Better for lounging than short-legged upright sitting |
| Durability | 3.6 | Cushion and edge softening appeared earlier than on Taylor |
| Cleaning | 4.0 | The test spill lifted in three passes without a ring |
| Layout | 4.1 | Conventional shape, but the 90-inch width needs room |
| Repositioning | 3.9 | Easy to curl up, less stable for quick upright shifts |
| Value | 4.2 | Good value if softness is the priority |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | Best for relaxed comfort, not firm back support |
Taylor 3 Seat Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Taylor handled the widest range of normal living-room jobs. Its 18-inch seat height and 23-inch depth kept our feet closer to the floor than Ava, while the front edge stayed stable during laptop work and conversation. The center cushion compressed about 1.2 inches under load and the edge 0.9 inch, the smallest gap between center and edge in the group. That firmness made standing up and changing positions easier without turning the sofa into a hard seat.
The compromise is heat, not support. After two hours, the chenille surface was 7.4°F warmer than its starting point. Crumbs vacuumed out in one pass, but the textured weave needed two lint-roller passes for pet hair. After 50 repeated sit-and-stand cycles, the reversible seat cushion had shifted less than a quarter inch and the seams remained straight. Taylor is not the sofa for a deep, pillow-like sink; it is the model we would put in a room used for work, TV, and guests every day.
What we liked
-
The seat and edge stayed level enough for upright work, conversation, and easy standing.
-
Reversible seat and back cushions make wear easier to distribute.
-
The 88-inch frame seats three without the power, weight, or clearance demands of Ava.
Who it is best for
-
Households that need one sofa for work, TV, conversation, and regular guests.
-
People who dislike the slow slouch that develops on softer seats.
-
Buyers who want customizable upholstery without paying for motion features.
Where it falls short
-
The chenille holds warmth and clings to pet hair more than a smooth weave.
-
The medium-firm seat will disappoint shoppers who want to sink deeply.
-
The 18-inch seat may feel low to tall users or anyone with limited mobility.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Stable medium-firm support | Chenille retains heat and hair |
| Reversible seats and backs | Not a deep, soft lounge seat |
| Strong price-to-performance balance | Low seat is not ideal for everyone |

Details
- Price checked Aug. 19, 2026: $1,399.99 sale / $1,599.99 regular
-
Dimensions: 88 W × 37 H × 38 D in.
-
Seat height: 18 in.; seat depth: 23 in.
-
Ready-to-order upholstery: 100% polyester textured chenille
-
Cushions: reversible 1.8-density seats and reversible fiber-filled backs
-
Inside width: 72 in.; weight: 140 lb.
-
Customization: hundreds of fabric choices
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.5 | No power setup and the lightest frame in the group |
| Cooling | 3.6 | Chenille gained 7.4°F during the two-hour test |
| Seat Comfort | 4.0 | Medium-firm comfort stayed consistent |
| Back Support | 4.2 | The back cushions supported upright use without pushing the head forward |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | The 23-inch depth suited a broad range of sitting positions |
| Durability | 3.8 | Less than a quarter inch of cushion shift after 50 sit cycles |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | Crumbs lifted quickly; hair needed a second pass |
| Layout | 4.2 | Straightforward 88-inch frame with no motion clearance |
| Repositioning | 4.1 | Firm edge and moderate depth made position changes easy |
| Value | 4.4 | The best balance of price and everyday usefulness here |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Best three-model choice for mixed daily use |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling | Durability | Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ava Sofa | 4.2 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Taylor 3 Seat Sofa | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 4.1 |
| Sandy Sofa | 3.9 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.9 |
The numbers show why there is no universal winner. Ava leads on comfort, back support, and position changes, but its cooling score and price keep it from being the obvious choice for every room. Taylor gives up some softness in exchange for steadier upright support and better value. Sandy nearly matches Taylor on seat comfort, yet its lower back-support and durability scores make it a lounge-first sofa rather than an all-day work seat.
How to Choose a Havertys Sofa?
Start with your most common posture. Choose Ava if you recline for long periods and want powered neck and leg support. Choose Taylor if the same sofa must handle upright conversation, laptop work, TV, and guests. Choose Sandy if you spend more time reading, curling up, or hosting casually and prefer softness to firm lumbar support. Then check the physical cost: Ava needs power and 6 inches behind it, Sandy takes the most wall space at 90 inches, and Taylor's 18-inch seat may feel low to tall users. Finally, compare the exact upholstery sample you plan to order; fabric choice can change heat, cleanup, lead time, and price.
Limitations
This review covers first-hand comfort, motion, cleanup, cushion response, and early wear over a limited test window. It cannot show how the frames, springs, motors, or upholstery will age over many years. Upholstery also matters: Ava's current online default is leather, while our test unit used microfiber, and both Sandy and Taylor offer custom fabrics that may behave differently from the ready-to-order versions. Treat the durability scores as comparisons of early change, not lifetime forecasts, and confirm the current price, fabric specifications, and delivery terms for the exact configuration you order.
Havertys Vs. Alternatives
Why choose these Havertys models
Ava, Sandy, and Taylor cover three distinct comfort profiles without forcing every buyer into a modular system. Ava provides powered support, Sandy delivers the softest traditional sit, and Taylor offers the strongest price-to-usefulness balance. Havertys also gives eligible furniture buyers a three-day window after delivery or pickup to reselect or cancel, although delivery fees are not refunded and exclusions apply.
Alternatives to consider
La-Z-Boy Trouper Reclining Sofa: Trouper is the closest alternative to Ava if the reclining mechanism matters more than a low-profile living-room look. La-Z-Boy offers manual and powered Trouper configurations, including versions with powered headrest and lumbar support. Ava feels more visually integrated as a sofa, while Trouper gives you a broader recliner-first configuration range.
West Elm Harmony Sofa: Harmony is the better match for shoppers who want a deeper, softer lounge without motors. Its width, cushion, and fabric options are extensive, and its extra-plush seat is better for sprawling than Taylor. It does not provide Ava's powered head and leg support, and the softer cushions need more regular fluffing.
IKEA KIVIK Sofa: KIVIK costs considerably less than these Havertys models and combines a deep seat, low arms, pocket springs, and removable covers. It is the more sensible choice when washable-cover practicality and budget come first. Taylor and Sandy look more tailored, offer a different level of upholstery customization, and avoid the self-service feel of the IKEA buying and setup process.
Pro Tips for Havertys
-
Measure the full delivery route, including doorways, stair turns, elevator depth, and the final wall.
-
Mark the sofa footprint with painter's tape and live with it for a day before ordering.
-
For Ava, mark the 6-inch recline clearance and plan the outlet and cord path at the same time.
-
Sit for at least 20 minutes in your usual posture; a soft first minute can hide weak lumbar support.
-
Ask for the care code and test a fabric swatch with water, lint, and pet hair before choosing a custom cover.
-
Rotate Sandy and Taylor's reversible cushions regularly instead of waiting for visible wear.
-
Keep a slim lumbar pillow near Sandy if the sofa will also be used for work or long upright conversations.
-
Recheck the displayed price after selecting fabric or leather because the base price may not match your configuration.
-
Use the three-day reselect or cancellation window immediately; delivery fees are not refunded and exclusions apply.
FAQs
Which Havertys sofa felt best for back support during long TV nights?
Ava was the best for reclined TV viewing because its powered headrest kept supporting the neck as the footrest moved. Taylor was better for long upright sessions. Choose between them based on whether you usually recline or keep both feet on the floor.
Which model is easiest to place in a smaller living room?
Taylor is the easiest overall. Ava is eight inches narrower, but it needs an outlet, a cord path, and 6 inches behind the frame to recline; Sandy is the widest at 90 inches. Taylor's conventional 88-by-38-inch footprint creates fewer layout constraints.
Which sofa is best if I tend to overheat?
None of the three stood out for cooling; each scored 3.6/5. Ava traps more warmth around the legs while reclined, Taylor's chenille warms up during long sits, and Sandy's soft cushions hold body heat. The exact upholstery choice will matter more than the model name.
Which sofa is easiest to curl up on?
Sandy. Its soft seat, loose back cushions, padded rolled arms, and toss pillows make it the most natural choice for reading or sitting with a leg tucked under. That softness is also why it provides less lumbar support than Ava or Taylor.
How strict is the reselect or cancellation window?
Eligible furniture must be reselected or canceled within three days of delivery or pickup if the color, comfort, or quality is not right. Delivery fees are not refunded, pickup orders must return to the original pickup location, and several categories are excluded. Check the current terms for your order before delivery.