Arhaus sits squarely in the premium sofa category: substantial frames, plush cushions, and plenty of upholstery choices if you want to fine-tune the look. In our hands-on testing, the biggest make-or-break variable was fit—especially seat depth and back height—because those details changed how each sofa handled laptop time, long movie nights, and casual hosting. The trade-off is straightforward: these comfort-first builds lean deep and loungey, so they can feel less supportive if you prefer a more upright sit.
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kipton Wide Arm Sofa | 4.4 | Plush, supportive seat; depth options; easy all-day lounging | Deep option can feel oversized for petite users; cleaning depends on upholstery | Mixed-use living rooms, frequent loungers | From $4,400 |
| Remington Two-Over-Two Sofa | 4.3 | Balanced softness; steady support through posture changes; depth options | Low back may not satisfy neck/upper-back support needs | People who move from laptop posture to relaxed TV time | From $4,700 |
| Coburn Three-Piece Motion Sofa | 4.2 | Best for reclining; powered footrest/back; performance fabric | Needs outlet access and clearance; harder to rearrange | Dedicated TV rooms, nightly reclining, larger spaces | From $9,000 |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the three verified models, Kipton was the easiest to settle into for hours at a time. Remington felt the most balanced when we moved from upright laptop posture to relaxed TV posture without losing support. Coburn Motion was the clear recline specialist, but it asks more from the room: outlet access, a little wall clearance, and less freedom if you like moving furniture around. Marcus kept gravitating toward seats that resisted a hunched, hammock-like slump, while Mia kept coming back to depth as the fit variable that mattered most over long sessions.
Arhaus Sofa Comparison Chart
| Category | Kipton Wide Arm Sofa | Remington Two-Over-Two Sofa | Coburn Three-Piece Motion Sofa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | From $4,400 | From $4,700 | From $9,000 |
| Size options shown | 85", 95", 105" | 84", 96", 108" | 121" length noted in testing coverage |
| Depth options shown | Standard 40", Deep 44" | Standard 40", Deep 46" | 44" overall depth; extra recline clearance required |
| Frame/support | Hardwood laminate frame; no-sag springs | Hardwood laminate frame; Flexolator suspension | Reinforced hardwood frame; no-sag springs |
| Seat cushion build | Plant-based foam + down/feather; steel coils | Plant-based foam + down/feather; steel coils | Dense foam + down/feather |
| Back cushion build | Memory fiber; elastic webbing | Webbing-supported backrests | Poly fiber + down/feather; elastic webbing |
| Upholstery notes | Multiple fabrics/leathers; swatches encouraged | Multiple fabrics/finishes; swatches encouraged | Crypton performance fabric noted in listing |
| Recline/power | None | None | Powered recline; needs outlet access and some wall clearance |
| Quick feel | Plush-supportive lounge | Controlled softness | Recline-first comfort |
How We Tested It
We used each sofa the way people actually do—laptop work, binge-watching, gaming, naps, and hosting. For scoring, we tracked assembly and delivery setup, cooling/breathability, seat comfort, back support, durability feel over repeated use, layout practicality (including how easy each piece was to place and reset), cleaning effort, and overall value. We also rotated different body types through the same routines to surface fit differences in seat depth and back height.
Arhaus Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Kipton Wide Arm Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

Kipton quickly turned into the default seat in our space. During long laptop blocks, the cushion felt plush without letting my hips drop too far, and it was easy to shift into TV posture without the seat flattening out. Marcus kept testing the front edge—tying shoes, quick stand-ups, short perches—and it stayed stable instead of folding away. Mia liked curling into the corner, but on the deep setup she still wanted a couple of pillows to keep her shoulders from drifting forward.
What we liked
-
Plush feel without bottoming out
-
Stable front edge for quick perching and stand-ups
-
Standard and deep options make fit easier to dial in
Who it is best for
-
People who switch between upright sitting and laid-back lounging
-
High-use living rooms where comfort matters more than a formal sit
Where it falls short
-
Deep setups can feel oversized for shorter legs
-
Cleaning effort depends on the upholstery you choose
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Plush seat with real support | Deep setting can feel oversized for petite users |
| Depth and width options help with fit | Cleaning depends on upholstery choice |
| Stable feel under repeated edge-sit tests | Not ideal if you want a consistently upright posture |
| Comfort holds up for long movie runs | May need extra pillows for strict lumbar/neck support |

Details:
-
Price: From $4,400
-
Size options shown: 85", 95", 105"
-
Depth options shown: Standard 40", Deep 44"
-
Frame: cross-directional hardwood laminate
-
Support: no-sag springs (recycled steel)
-
Seat: plant-based foam + down/feather; interconnected steel coils
-
Back: memory fiber with elastic-webbing support
-
Customization: multiple pieces; wide range of fabrics and leathers

Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | White-glove setup is easy; the main work is clearing space and planning placement. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.8 | Plush enough for long sessions without feeling like you disappear into the seat. |
| Back Support | 4.4 | Great for relaxed posture; a lumbar pillow helps for long laptop blocks. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.5 | Depth options help, but the deep setting can overwhelm shorter legs. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.1 | Fine in normal indoor temps; thick cushioning can run warm in long marathons. |
| Durability | 4.6 | Felt steady through repeated posture changes and edge sitting. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.1 | Manageable day to day, but not something you’ll slide around constantly. |
| Cleaning | 4.1 | Mostly comes down to fabric choice and how your household uses the sofa. |
| Value | 4.1 | Premium pricing, but it makes sense if this is your main daily landing spot. |
| Overall Score | 4.4 | A strong “default sofa” for mixed routines. |
Remington Two-Over-Two Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

Remington felt like the most controlled lounge in the group—the one that stayed composed when we started upright and gradually relaxed into the cushions later. Carlos spent a full work-from-sofa afternoon on it and liked that the back stayed steady instead of collapsing into a rounded slouch. Jamal used it for stretching and gaming, and the seat stayed supportive enough that standing back up never felt like a chore. Its sweet spot is that middle ground where you want softness without turning the whole sit into a hammock.

What we liked
-
Support stays consistent as you shift positions
-
A sink-in top layer that still holds its shape
-
Depth options make it easier to match both body size and room
Who it is best for
-
People who start upright (laptop) and end reclined (TV)
-
Taller loungers who want depth without total sag
Where it falls short
-
The low back will not satisfy everyone who wants head and neck support
-
If you never reset posture, the softness can still invite slouching

Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Balanced softness with structure | Low back can under-serve neck support |
| Depth choices help fit different bodies | Softness can invite slouching over long sits |
| Support system stays steady in repeated use | Cleaning varies by upholstery selection |
| Works well for laptop-to-TV routines | Less of a ‘formal sit’ sofa |

Details:
-
Price: From $4,700
-
Size options shown: 84", 96", 108"
-
Depth options shown: Standard 40", Deep 46"
-
Frame: cross-directional hardwood laminate
-
Support: recycled-steel Flexolator suspension under the seat
-
Back: webbing-supported backrests
-
Seat: coils + partly plant-based foam; down/feather in down-proof casings
-
Build notes: down-proof casings with channel stitching to keep fill in place
-
Customization: multiple pieces; fabrics and finishes

Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Mostly about delivery coordination and making the room ready. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.5 | Soft surface feel with enough underlying support for long sessions. |
| Back Support | 4.2 | Stable, but the low profile benefits from a pillow if you want more height. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.3 | Deep works well for tall loungers; standard suits more rooms and mixed postures. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0 | Comfortable in typical indoor conditions; thick cushions hold some warmth. |
| Durability | 4.6 | Felt steady through repeated posture changes. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.2 | Easy to live with and reset; not fussy day to day. |
| Cleaning | 4.0 | Plan around the upholstery you choose (and whether you have pets/snacks). |
| Value | 4.3 | Strong balance of comfort and support at its starting tier. |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | The best “structured lounge” feel of the group. |
Coburn Three-Piece Motion Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

Coburn Motion is where the test shifted from sofa review to recliner reality. We ran it through the routine that usually exposes weak points: start upright, watch an episode, recline for the next, then get up and sit back down later. Reclined, it was the most consistently comfortable seat of the group—feet up, back down, and very little pressure buildup. Upright, the low profile was more divisive; I wanted more height during laptop time. The power hardware also changes the room math: you need outlet access and a little clearance behind the back so the recline path stays clear.

What we liked
-
Best decompression comfort when fully reclined
-
Smooth, easy power recline and footrest action
-
Performance-fabric upholstery is practical for everyday use
Who it is best for
-
Dedicated TV rooms and nightly recliners
-
Larger rooms where outlets and clearance are easy to plan around
Where it falls short
-
Not very flexible to rearrange; power and clearance dictate placement
-
Low back is less satisfying for long upright work sessions

Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Power recline delivers true movie-seat comfort | Needs electricity and cord/placement planning |
| Plush feel really shines when reclined | Requires clearance behind the sofa |
| Performance fabric is practical | Less flexible for moving and layout changes |
| Great for families and frequent lounging | Low profile can under-serve upright support needs |

Details:
-
Price: From $9,000
-
Configuration: Left Arm Recliner + Armless Recliner + Right Arm Recliner
-
Frame: solid, reinforced hardwood
-
Upholstery: Crypton performance fabrics (stain-, odor-, and moisture-resistant)
-
Support: no-sag springs (recycled steel)
-
Seat: dense foam with down/feather
-
Back: poly fiber + down/feather with elastic-webbing support
-
Motion controls: two-button power controls; allow 3"–4" clearance behind to recline
-
Power: 8' cords; electricity required
-
Dimensions (tested configuration): 121" wide x 44" deep x 31" high; the reclined footprint extends farther into the room

Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.7 | Delivery is smooth, but planning for power and clearance matters most here. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.8 | Reclined comfort is the best of the set for long sessions and pressure relief. |
| Back Support | 3.9 | Upright posture is less supportive for long work blocks; recline is excellent. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | Deep lounging is easy; shorter legs may prefer added foot support. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0 | Comfortable overall; the sink-in feel can run warm in long marathons. |
| Durability | 4.4 | Feels substantial, but moving parts add complexity versus a static sofa. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.7 | Cords, clearance, and multi-piece design make it harder to shift around. |
| Cleaning | 4.6 | Performance fabric helps keep cleanup low-stress. |
| Value | 3.8 | You’re paying for motion features and scale; worth it if reclining is the priority. |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Best when reclining is the main job, not an occasional bonus. |
Delivery, Returns, and Warranty
Arhaus typically ships sofas with White Glove service: the team brings the piece in, unpacks it, inspects it, assembles it, places it, and removes the packaging. Published White Glove rates are $299 for local delivery areas, $399–$599 for extended areas, and $1,699 for Alaska and Hawaii.
For returns, stock furniture generally has a 14-day window, and a 10% restocking fee may apply when the return is not due to manufacturer defect or damage. Custom special-order merchandise is typically not eligible for cancellations, returns, or exchanges.
Arhaus also offers a limited warranty that covers upholstered furniture frames and spring support systems for life in residential use.
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kipton Wide Arm Sofa | 4.4 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 4.1 |
| Remington Two-Over-Two Sofa | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Coburn Three-Piece Motion Sofa | 4.2 | 4.8 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 3.7 |
On the score grid, Kipton is the most rounded everyday option: strong comfort without a major weak spot. Remington is the better pick if you want more structure while keeping a lounge feel. Coburn Motion is the specialist—excellent in recline, but the least flexible to place and move.
How to Choose the Arhaus Sofa?
Start with how you actually sit. If you drift into a semi-recline for hours, prioritize depth options and cushion recovery. If you work on the sofa, pay attention to back height and whether you can stay upright without slowly sliding forward. Standard depth usually feels more controllable for petite users, while taller loungers tend to prefer deeper seats.
For busy households, upholstery matters as much as comfort—especially if you have kids, pets, or snack-heavy movie nights. If you want quick picks from this test:
-
Kipton: best for deep-seat loungers and mixed daily routines.
-
Remington: best for people who move from laptop posture to TV posture and still want structure.
-
Coburn Motion: best for nightly reclining in a dedicated setup with outlets and clearance.
Limitations
Much of Arhaus comfort still skews lounge-first: deeper seats and plush top layers can encourage slouching if you do not reset posture. Low-profile backs can also be a deal-breaker if you want steady shoulder and neck support while upright. Motion seating adds power and clearance requirements that limit placement flexibility. And because return rules differ for stock vs. custom orders, measuring and fit planning matter as much as seat feel.
Arhaus Sofa Vs. Alternatives
-
Why choose these models
-
Premium-feel cushioning paired with substantial support systems
-
Customizable upholstery and practical fabric options for real daily use
-
White Glove delivery that takes the heavy lifting out of setup
-
-
Alternatives to consider
-
Crate & Barrel Lounge Collection: similarly cozy, deep-seat comfort with a different overall style.
-
RH Cloud Sofa: iconic sink-in softness with a modular, lounge-first vibe.
-
La-Z-Boy Trouper Reclining Sofa: classic recliner comfort at a more mainstream price tier.
-
Pro Tips for Arhaus Sofa
-
Measure doorways, tight turns, and stair landings before delivery day. Treat it like logistics, not aesthetics.
-
If you’re torn between standard and deep, decide whether you’re a ‘feet on the floor’ or ‘feet up’ sitter.
-
If you notice slide-forward lounging, try a thin lumbar pillow early—it can change long-session comfort fast.
-
Rotate sitting spots for the first few weeks so one ‘favorite seat’ doesn’t take all the early wear.
-
For performance fabrics, keep a basic spot-clean kit nearby and deal with spills immediately.
-
If you run warm, choose a more breathable weave and review a few fabric-sofa options before you commit.
-
In shared seating, test motion transfer: have one person stand/sit repeatedly while the other stays put.
-
For motion sofas, plan outlet access and cord routing before you commit to final placement.
-
Use an ottoman to “shorten” an overly deep seat if shorter legs need better foot support.
FAQs
Which Arhaus sofa felt best for long movie nights?
For full recline, Coburn Motion was the easiest to settle into for multiple episodes. If you want a non-motion option, Kipton was the easiest to live on for long stretches, while Remington felt a little more structured if you still wanted support.
How do I avoid feeling like I’m sliding forward on a softer sofa?
Sit all the way back, add a thin lumbar pillow, and choose a depth that lets your feet find support. Softer tops feel best when you’re slightly reclined—not perched on the front edge.
What’s the biggest practical mistake people make with reclining sofas?
Placing the sofa too close to the wall—or without a plan for power. Leave clearance for the recline path and map cords/outlets before delivery so you are not reworking the room afterward. That matters even more with power reclining sofas.