Arhaus sofas are expensive, generously cushioned, and highly customizable, but comfort depends on choosing the right dimensions. In our hands-on testing, seat depth and back height mattered more than any finish or fabric. Kipton was the best all-around lounger, Remington made it easier to move between work and TV, and Coburn Motion delivered the strongest reclined comfort. None is a natural fit for every room or sitting style, so this review focuses on the differences you will feel after an hour, not just what looks good in a showroom.
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Regular Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kipton Wide Arm Sofa | 4.4/5 | Plush but supportive; standard and deep seats | Deep version overwhelms shorter legs; fabric affects upkeep | Everyday living rooms and long lounging sessions | From $5,300 |
| Remington Sofa | 4.3/5 | Medium-soft feel; steady support as posture changes | Low back gives limited neck and shoulder support | Laptop-to-TV routines and taller loungers | From $4,700 |
| Coburn Three-Piece Motion Sofa | 4.2/5 | Excellent reclined comfort; powered seats; practical fabric options | Requires power and clearance; difficult to rearrange | Large TV rooms and daily reclining | From $9,000; promotions vary |
Testing Team Takeaways
Kipton was the easiest sofa to use for hours without thinking about it. Its seat stayed plush through work, conversation, and movie time, although the deep version needed extra pillows for shorter testers. Remington felt more controlled when we moved from an upright laptop position to a relaxed TV posture. Coburn Motion was the clear recline specialist, but its cords, 121-inch width, and extended footprint make placement part of the buying decision.
Fit separated these models more than softness. Testers who wanted both feet on the floor preferred the standard-depth Kipton or Remington. Taller testers had more room in the deep versions. Coburn worked best when we treated it as dedicated motion seating rather than a general-purpose work sofa.
Arhaus Sofa Comparison Chart
| Category | Kipton Wide Arm Sofa | Remington Sofa | Coburn Three-Piece Motion Sofa |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regular starting price | From $5,300 | From $4,700 | From $9,000; promotions vary |
| Widths | 85", 95", 105" | 84", 96", 108" | 121" tested configuration |
| Overall depth | Standard 40"; deep 44" | Standard 40"; deep 46" | 44" upright; about 63" fully reclined |
| Seat fit data | 20" high; 22" or 26" deep | 18" high; 22" or 27" deep | 20" high; 24" deep |
| Frame and support | Hardwood laminate; no-sag springs | Hardwood laminate; Flexolator suspension | Reinforced hardwood; no-sag springs |
| Seat cushions | Partly plant-based foam, down/feather, steel coils | Partly plant-based foam, down/feather, steel coils | Dense foam with down/feather |
| Back cushions | Memory fiber; elastic webbing | Webbing-supported backrests | Poly fiber, down/feather; elastic webbing |
| Upholstery | Multiple fabrics and leathers | Multiple fabrics and finishes | Select performance-fabric options |
| Power | None | None | Powered recline; 3"–4" rear clearance |
| Seat character | Plush, supportive lounge | Medium-soft, structured lounge | Recline-first comfort |
How We Tested It
We used each sofa for laptop work, TV, gaming, naps, and casual hosting. Our five-point scoring covered delivery and setup, seat comfort, back support, seat-depth fit, cooling, short-term durability, repositioning, cleaning, and value. We also compared how the same seat felt for testers of different heights, especially whether their feet rested naturally, where the back support ended, and whether the cushion encouraged sliding forward.
We checked published dimensions against the test configurations and repeated normal stress points such as edge sitting, standing up, changing seats, and moving from upright to relaxed posture. For Coburn, we also checked cord placement, rear clearance, and the fully reclined footprint. The scores reflect the tested configurations and covers; another upholstery choice can change heat and cleaning performance.
Arhaus Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Kipton Wide Arm Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

Kipton became the seat people chose first. The cushion had enough give for curling up but did not collapse when we sat near the front edge or stood repeatedly. Its 20-inch seat height also made standing easier than it was on Remington. During long laptop sessions, the standard 22-inch seat depth kept shorter testers close to the back. The 26-inch deep seat gave taller testers room to stretch out, but shorter legs needed a lumbar pillow to avoid sliding forward.
The sofa kept the same basic character as we changed positions: soft at first contact, then more supportive underneath. That made it the strongest mixed-use option in the group. The 40- and 44-inch overall depths also give buyers a meaningful fit choice, not just a small cosmetic difference. The main caution is maintenance. Its loose, plush look benefits from regular cushion shaping, and cleaning difficulty changes with the selected upholstery.
What we liked
-
The cushion feels plush without bottoming out during long sessions.
-
The front edge stays stable for short perches, shoe tying, and frequent stand-ups.
-
Two seat depths and three widths make it easier to match the sofa to both body size and room size.
Who it is best for
-
People who switch between upright sitting, conversation, and laid-back lounging.
-
Busy living rooms where long-session comfort matters more than a formal, rigid sit.
Where it falls short
-
The 26-inch deep seat can pull shorter users away from the backrest without an extra pillow.
-
Loose cushions need shaping, and stain resistance depends on the chosen cover.
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Plush seat with dependable support | Deep seat can overwhelm shorter legs |
| Useful width and depth choices | Upkeep depends on upholstery |
| Stable during repeated edge sitting | Not ideal for consistently upright posture |
| Comfort holds up through long movie sessions | May need a lumbar pillow for laptop work |

Details:
-
Regular price: from $5,300
-
Widths: 85", 95", 105"
-
Overall depth: standard 40" or deep 44"
-
Seat fit: 20" high; 22" standard or 26" deep
-
Frame: cross-directional hardwood laminate
-
Support: recycled-steel no-sag springs
-
Seat: partly plant-based foam, down/feather padding, and interconnected steel coils
-
Back: memory fiber with elastic-webbing support
-
Customization: multiple pieces, fabrics, and leathers

Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6/5 | White Glove setup is straightforward; room preparation is the main task. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.8/5 | Plush for long sessions without losing its supportive base. |
| Back Support | 4.4/5 | Comfortable when relaxed; laptop work is better with a lumbar pillow. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.5/5 | Two depths broaden the fit range, though deep is too much for some users. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.1/5 | Comfortable at normal room temperature; thick cushioning retains some warmth. |
| Durability | 4.6/5 | Stayed steady through repeated posture changes and edge sitting. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.1/5 | Easy to use day to day, but too substantial for frequent room changes. |
| Cleaning | 4.1/5 | Results depend heavily on fabric selection and prompt spot care. |
| Value | 4.1/5 | The premium makes the most sense for a sofa used every day. |
| Overall Score | 4.4/5 | The most versatile choice for mixed routines. |
Remington Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

Remington offered the most controlled version of a soft sofa. We could begin upright with a laptop, shift sideways for gaming, and lean back for TV without feeling as if the cushion had changed shape around us. The 18-inch seat height is lower than Kipton’s, but the Flexolator suspension and coil-supported cushions gave us a stable base when standing up. That balance explains why Remington scored slightly below Kipton for pure comfort but remained the better work-to-TV option.

The seat measurements make the fit difference clear. Standard depth provides about 22 inches of usable seat, while the deep version reaches 27 inches. The 22-inch seat worked for the widest range of testers and made upright sitting easier. The 27-inch version gave taller loungers welcome legroom but pushed shorter users toward a reclined position. The back stayed steady at the waist and lower back, yet its low height did not provide the shoulder and neck support some testers wanted.
What we liked
-
Support stays consistent as you move from upright sitting to a relaxed posture.
-
The medium-soft surface gives without turning the seat loose or shapeless.
-
Three widths and two depths cover both compact layouts and tall users.
Who it is best for
-
People who work on the sofa during the day and relax on it later.
-
Taller loungers who want extra depth with more structure than Kipton provides.
Where it falls short
-
The low back stops short of full shoulder and neck support.
-
The deep version still encourages slouching if your feet cannot reach the floor.

Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Medium-soft feel with structure | Low back limits neck support |
| Depth choices fit different bodies | Deep version can encourage slouching |
| Support stays steady through position changes | Cleaning varies by upholstery |
| Well suited to work-to-TV routines | Less formal than its tailored shape suggests |

Details:
-
Regular price: from $4,700
-
Widths: 84", 96", 108"
-
Overall depth: standard 40" or deep 46"
-
Seat fit: 18" high; 22" standard or 27" deep
-
Frame: cross-directional hardwood laminate
-
Support: recycled-steel Flexolator suspension
-
Seat: steel coils, partly plant-based foam, and down/feather padding
-
Back: flexible-webbing support
-
Build: down-proof casings with channel stitching
-
Customization: multiple pieces, fabrics, and finishes

Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6/5 | Delivery coordination and a clear path are the main setup tasks. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.5/5 | Medium-soft on top with a supportive base for long sessions. |
| Back Support | 4.2/5 | Stable at the lower back, but too low for full shoulder and neck support. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.3/5 | Standard suits mixed postures; deep is better for tall loungers. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0/5 | Comfortable in typical indoor conditions, though thick cushions retain warmth. |
| Durability | 4.6/5 | Support remained even during repeated position changes. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.2/5 | Simple to reset and live with, without loose modular pieces. |
| Cleaning | 4.0/5 | The result depends on the selected fabric and household use. |
| Value | 4.3/5 | A strong balance of support, size choice, and comfort at its starting price. |
| Overall Score | 4.3/5 | The best structured-lounge feel of the three. |
Coburn Three-Piece Motion Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

Coburn Motion changed the test because its best position is not upright. We began each session with the seats closed, watched one episode, reclined for the next, and then repeated the transition. With the footrest raised and the back lowered, it provided the best pressure relief in the group. In the upright position, the low 31-inch overall height left some testers wanting more upper-back support during laptop work.

The space requirements are substantial and easy to underestimate. Our configuration measured 121 inches wide, 44 inches deep, and 31 inches high. Fully reclined, the footprint reached about 63 inches, and Arhaus calls for another 3–4 inches behind the sofa so the mechanism can move freely. The 8-foot cords helped with outlet access, but cords and three connected pieces still narrowed our placement options. The 20-inch seat height and 24-inch seat depth felt comfortable for lounging, while shorter testers relied on the powered footrest for leg support.
What we liked
-
Reclined comfort was the best of the group for long TV sessions.
-
The powered back and footrest moved smoothly and made small position changes easy.
-
Select performance-fabric options reduce the stress of everyday spills.
Who it is best for
-
Dedicated TV rooms where reclining is a daily habit, not an occasional feature.
-
Large rooms with convenient outlets and enough space for the extended footprint.
Where it falls short
-
Its connected pieces, cords, and clearance needs make rearranging difficult.
-
The low upright back is less comfortable for long work sessions.

Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent powered recline for TV | Requires power and cord planning |
| Best pressure relief when reclined | Needs rear and front clearance |
| Practical performance-fabric options | Difficult to move or reconfigure |
| Supportive footrest for shorter legs | Low back is weaker for upright work |

Details:
-
Regular price: from $9,000; temporary promotions may lower the checkout price
-
Configuration: left-arm recliner, armless recliner, and right-arm recliner
-
Dimensions: 121" wide x 44" deep x 31" high; about 63" deep when fully reclined
-
Seat fit: 20" high and 24" deep
-
Frame: solid, reinforced hardwood
-
Support: recycled-steel no-sag springs
-
Seat: dense foam with down/feather padding
-
Back: poly fiber and down/feather with elastic-webbing support
-
Motion: two-button power controls; allow 3"–4" behind the sofa
-
Power: 8-foot cords; electricity required
-
Layout: connected motion pieces are not modular or designed to stand alone

Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.7/5 | Delivery is smooth, but outlet and clearance planning must happen first. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.8/5 | The strongest reclined comfort and pressure relief in this test. |
| Back Support | 3.9/5 | Excellent when reclined; limited during long upright work sessions. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0/5 | Easy to lounge in, with the powered footrest helping shorter legs. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0/5 | Comfortable overall, but thick cushions can retain heat over time. |
| Durability | 4.4/5 | The frame feels substantial, though motion hardware adds complexity. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.7/5 | Cords, clearance, and connected pieces restrict layout changes. |
| Cleaning | 4.6/5 | Performance-fabric options make routine cleanup easier. |
| Value | 3.8/5 | The price is justified only if the powered recline will be used often. |
| Overall Score | 4.2/5 | The best specialist for daily reclining, not the best general-purpose sofa. |
Delivery, Returns, and Warranty
Arhaus White Glove Delivery includes unpacking, inspection, assembly, room placement, and packaging removal for applicable furniture. Current rates are $349 for standard White Glove service and $499 for oversized delivery. Alaska and Hawaii cost $1,699, or $1,849 for oversized delivery. Measure every doorway, turn, stair landing, and elevator before ordering; delivery teams cannot make an oversized sofa fit.
Stock furniture has a 14-day return window. A 10% restocking fee applies when the return is not caused by a manufacturer defect or transit damage, and delivery fees are generally nonrefundable. Custom special-order merchandise cannot be canceled, returned, or exchanged, so confirm the fabric, depth, and access path before production begins.
The limited warranty is not blanket lifetime coverage. In residential use, qualifying frame and spring-support breakage is covered for life. Cushion cores and tailoring are covered for three years, as are motion mechanisms. Fabric and leather are excluded. The warranty is non-transferable and subject to care, use, and proof-of-purchase requirements.
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling | Durability | Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kipton Wide Arm Sofa | 4.4/5 | 4.8/5 | 4.4/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.1/5 | 4.6/5 | 4.1/5 |
| Remington Sofa | 4.3/5 | 4.5/5 | 4.2/5 | 4.3/5 | 4.0/5 | 4.6/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Coburn Three-Piece Motion Sofa | 4.2/5 | 4.8/5 | 3.9/5 | 4.0/5 | 4.0/5 | 4.4/5 | 3.7/5 |
Kipton is the most complete everyday choice, pairing top-tier comfort with no major weakness. Remington gives up a little softness in exchange for more control as posture changes. Coburn earns the same seat-comfort score as Kipton when reclined, but lower back-support, value, and repositioning scores keep it in specialist territory.
How to Choose the Right Arhaus Sofa
Choose by sitting posture before color or fabric. If you keep both feet on the floor or work on the sofa, start with a 22-inch seat depth: the standard Kipton and Remington both meet that mark. If you usually sit sideways or put your feet up, Kipton’s 26-inch deep seat or Remington’s 27-inch deep seat gives you more room. Remington feels more controlled; Kipton feels plusher.
Back height matters just as much. Kipton and Remington support relaxed sitting well but may need a lumbar or neck pillow for long work sessions. Coburn makes the most sense when you plan to use the powered recline every day. It needs a 121-inch wall, an approximately 63-inch open footprint when extended, rear clearance, and access to power.
For children, pets, or frequent snacks, order swatches and compare cleaning codes before committing. A performance fabric can reduce worry, but it does not make every spill harmless. Remember that custom upholstery usually makes the order nonreturnable.
-
Kipton is the best all-around choice for deep-seat lounging and mixed daily routines.
-
Remington is the best fit for people who move from laptop posture to TV posture and want the seat to stay composed.
-
Coburn Motion is the best choice for nightly reclining in a large, dedicated setup.
Limitations
All three sofas favor relaxed sitting. Their plush top layers can encourage sliding forward if the seat is too deep, and the low-profile backs on Remington and Coburn do not replace a high-back sofa for shoulder and neck support. Upholstery also changes cooling and cleanup enough that one tested cover cannot represent every option. Coburn adds electrical and mechanical complexity, while its footprint limits placement. Finally, Arhaus’s short stock-furniture return window and nonreturnable custom orders leave little room for a fit mistake.
Arhaus Sofa Vs. Alternatives
These Arhaus models stand out for substantial frames, layered cushions, broad upholstery choices, and White Glove delivery. Kipton and Remington also offer useful width and depth options, while Coburn combines the brand’s low-profile look with powered motion. The trade-off is price: several strong competitors deliver a similar sitting style or more specialized support for less.
Crate & Barrel Lounge is the closest alternative to Kipton or Remington. It offers multiple widths and standard or deep configurations, with a relaxed track-arm shape and a lower starting price. Choose Lounge if you want broad size selection and deep, non-motion comfort without paying Arhaus prices. Kipton still feels more layered and supportive in our comparison, while Remington stays more composed for upright use.
RH Cloud is softer and more modular than these Arhaus sofas. Its down-and-feather cushioning around a foam core creates a looser, deeper lounge, and modular versions are easier to expand or rearrange than Coburn Motion. Choose Cloud if reconfiguration and a pronounced sink-in feel are the priorities. Choose Kipton or Remington if you want clearer edge support and an easier transition back to upright sitting.
La-Z-Boy Trouper Power Reclining Sofa is the practical alternative to Coburn. Its taller 41.5-inch back, power-tilt headrests, USB ports, and 85-inch width make it easier to fit and more supportive above the shoulders. It also sits in a lower price tier. Coburn wins on a cleaner, lower-profile look and wider shared seating; Trouper is the stronger choice when head support, compact width, and value matter more than minimalist styling.
Pro Tips for Arhaus Sofa
-
Measure doors, hallways, turns, stairs, and elevators before delivery, not just the final wall.
-
If you are between standard and deep, decide whether you usually keep your feet down or up.
-
Add a thin lumbar pillow as soon as you notice yourself sliding forward.
-
Rotate seats during the first few weeks so one cushion does not take all the early wear.
-
Order upholstery swatches and check the cleaning code under your own lighting.
-
Blot spills promptly with the cleaner approved for the selected fabric.
-
Test motion transfer by having one person stand repeatedly while another remains seated.
-
For Coburn, mark the upright and reclined footprints on the floor and plan cord routing before delivery.
-
Do not treat a temporary promotional price as permanent; compare the checkout price and return eligibility.
FAQs
Which Arhaus sofa felt best for long movie nights?
Coburn Motion was the most comfortable when we wanted a full powered recline. Kipton was the best non-motion option for hours of lounging, while Remington felt more supportive when we still wanted to sit partly upright.
How do I avoid sliding forward on a soft sofa?
Choose a depth that lets you sit against the backrest without losing foot support. A thin lumbar pillow can close a small gap. If you still slide forward, move from a deep configuration to a standard one rather than adding more loose pillows.
What is the biggest planning mistake with a reclining sofa?
Buyers often measure only the upright depth. Coburn needs room behind the back, open floor space in front, and a safe path to an outlet. Map the fully reclined footprint and cord route before delivery so the sofa does not block a walkway or force an awkward layout.