Four Hands sits in the mid-to-premium sofa tier, with designer silhouettes that generally lean one of two ways: deep, lounge-first comfort or a lower, more tailored sit. For this review, we lived with four popular models priced roughly from $3,099 to $6,499.99 and scored them on assembly, cooling, comfort, durability, layout practicality, cleaning, and value. Below, I’ll break down who each sofa fits best—and where the trade-offs show up once you’re using it every day.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
| Kosa Sofa | 4.3/5 | Deep, forgiving lounge feel; easier on-and-off seat height | Big footprint; cushions look best with regular resets | Long streaming nights, reading, casual naps | $3,199.00 |
| Mazie Sofa | 4.1/5 | Structured comfort; balanced depth for daily sitting | Lower seat height; upholstery needs a bit more care | Mixed posture use, style-forward living rooms | $3,099.00 |
| Williams Leather Sofa | 3.9/5 | Leather is easy to wipe down; tidy, tailored sit | Low profile; leather can feel warmer over time | Smaller rooms, clean look, upright-leaning sitters | $5,199.00 |
| Westwood 4-Piece Sectional | 4.2/5 | Huge lounge capacity; deep-seat “sprawl” setup | Large and heavy; the depth won’t suit everyone | Hosting, families, big living rooms | $6,499.99 |
Testing Team Takeaways
Testing made the lineup’s intent obvious. Kosa and Westwood are made for sprawlers—soft enough to settle in and stay there—while Mazie and Williams feel more structured and “sit-first.” Kosa was the easiest sofa to live on for long nights because it stays comfortable across a lot of position changes, as long as you give the cushions a quick reset. Westwood was the clear hosting pick: with the right floor plan, it turns the room into a natural gathering spot. Mazie landed as the most balanced day-to-day sofa. Williams was the simplest to keep tidy thanks to leather, but the lower seat and warmer feel make it a more specific fit.
Four Hands Sofa Comparison Chart
| Comparison item | Kosa Sofa | Mazie Sofa | Williams Leather Sofa | Westwood 4-Piece Sectional |
| Overall dimensions | 108"W x 42"D x 37"H | 95.5"W x 35"D x 28.5"H | 75"W x 35"D x 28"H | 117"W x 117"D x 31"H |
| Seat depth | 25.5" | 25" | 24.5" | 31" |
| Seat height | 21.5" | 17" | 17" | 18" |
| Configuration | Sofa | Sofa | Sofa (75" or 90") | 4-piece sectional with ottoman |
| Upholstery / cover | Fabric options; duvet-like cushion concept | Polypropylene textile | Top grain leather | Polyester upholstery |
| Frame / visible wood | Pine plywood + solid pine + Rosa Morada (listed) | — | Solid ash (listed) | Solid banak base (listed) |
| Seat feel in use | Soft, sink-in lounge | Medium, steadier bench feel | Medium-firm, tailored sit | Soft-to-medium, deep lounge |
| Back support impression | Relaxed; better with a lumbar pillow for long laptop blocks | More upright-friendly for extended sitting | Supportive back feel in a low profile | Relaxed; best when you recline rather than perch |
| Cooling / breathability | Better than leather, but plush cushions can hold warmth | Balanced; depends on room airflow | Warmer feel over long sessions | Average; deep lounging can trap heat |
| Cleaning practicality | Removable casings help; still benefits from routine care | More “careful living” than wipe-clean | Wipe-friendly daily cleanup | Removable cushions help, but there’s a lot of surface area |
How We Tested It
We used each sofa the way most people do: laptop work, long streaming sessions, gaming nights, quick naps, and having friends over. We scored setup effort, heat build-up during two-hour sits, seat and back comfort across posture changes, durability signals after repeat use, layout practicality in a typical living room, cleaning friction from everyday messes, and value for the money. Each category score is on a 5-point scale, and the overall score reflects the same weighting across all four models.
Four Hands Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Kosa Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Kosa quickly established itself as the “sink-in and stay awhile” sofa. The cushion package makes it easy to relax without constantly negotiating your posture, and the taller seat height feels less like a low squat when you stand up.
It does have a personality: it’s happiest when you’re slightly reclined. During laptop work, we consistently preferred adding a small lumbar pillow so the relaxed back didn’t pull shoulders forward. Over the week, comfort stayed steady, and a quick cushion reset helped it keep a neat look.
What we liked
- Big, forgiving comfort that stays inviting late at night
- Easy to switch between reclined, cross-legged, and stretched-out lounging
- Seat height feels natural for getting in and out
Who it is best for
- People who lounge for hours and change positions often
- Households that treat the sofa as a daily decompression zone
- Anyone who wants a deep, relaxed sit without committing to a sectional
Where it falls short
- Upright laptop work unless you add lumbar support
- Smaller rooms where the depth eats into walking space
- Anyone who dislikes routine cushion fluffing/resetting

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Deep, lounge-first comfort | Large footprint can overwhelm smaller rooms |
| Taller seat height feels easier on knees | Relaxed back feel isn’t ideal for posture-focused sitting |
| Removable casings make upkeep easier | Cushions look best with regular resets |

Details
- Price (listed): $3,199.00
- Overall dimensions: 108"W x 42"D x 37"H
- Seat depth: 25.5"
- Seat height: 21.5"
- Seat width (listed): 83"
- Fill (listed): 90% polyurethane foam, 10% fiber
- Frame materials (listed): pine plywood, solid pine, solid Rosa Morada
- Cushion features (listed): reversible cushions with removable casings
- Made in (listed): Mexico
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Assembly | 4.2 | Simple, low-friction setup for a full-size sofa. |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Better than leather, but plush lounging can hold warmth. |
| Comfort | 4.7 | Excellent for streaming, reading, and naps; easy to stay comfortable. |
| Durability | 4.3 | Feel stayed consistent through repeat use; cushion upkeep matters. |
| Layout Practicality | 4.0 | Best with breathing room; the depth needs space. |
| Cleaning | 4.3 | Removable casings reduce day-to-day stress, but fabric still needs care. |
| Value | 4.4 | Strong comfort return for the price, especially for the size. |
| Overall | 4.3 | A top pick for deep-seat lounging without going full sectional. |
Mazie Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Mazie was the most “designed” looking sofa in the group—something you notice when you walk into the room, but still enjoy once you sit down. The seat is lower than Kosa, which gently shifts you into a more relaxed posture without the heavy sink of a cloud-style sofa.
In daily use, it felt steady and supportive for longer sitting blocks. Lounging is still comfortable, but it rewards a small throw pillow if you like to curl into a corner or want extra support behind the shoulders.
What we liked
- Balanced depth that works for lounging without swallowing you
- Steadier feel that supports longer sits
- A statement look that still feels practical day to day
Who it is best for
- People who move between upright sitting and relaxed reclining
- Households that want one sofa to handle work, TV, and guests
- Rooms where you want visual impact without giving up comfort
Where it falls short
- Anyone who dislikes a lower seat height
- People who want a true sink-in, duvet-like lounge
- Buyers who prefer ultra-low-maintenance upholstery

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Balanced depth with a steadier sitting feel | Lower seat height changes ease-of-standing |
| Good for mixed use: laptop, TV, guests | Not a plush, “cloud” experience |
| Distinct design presence | Upholstery takes more care than wipe-clean materials |

Details
- Price (listed): $3,099.00
- Overall dimensions: 95.5"W x 35"D x 28.5"H
- Seat depth: 25"
- Seat height: 17"
- Upholstery material (listed): polypropylene-based textile (Harmolan)
- Weight (listed): 135.58 lb
- Design notes (listed): back cutouts and bench-style seat
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Assembly | 4.2 | Manageable setup with no surprises. |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Comfortable temperature feel over longer sessions. |
| Comfort | 4.1 | Supportive enough for extended sitting; comfortable for casual lounging. |
| Durability | 4.2 | Held its feel well in daily use; the bench-style seat stayed consistent. |
| Layout Practicality | 4.1 | Fits more rooms than the deeper lounge models while still feeling relaxed. |
| Cleaning | 3.7 | More maintenance than wipe-clean materials; routine care matters. |
| Value | 4.0 | Strong mix of comfort and design, with some upkeep trade-offs. |
| Overall | 4.1 | The most balanced everyday sofa of the group. |
Williams Leather Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Williams reads like “clean lines, clear intent.” The low seat height gives it a lounge-adjacent feel, but the back and arms steer you toward a more tailored sit. For longer viewing sessions, it felt best when you sit back into the support rather than slouching forward.
Its biggest everyday win was cleanup. Crumbs, small drips, and general life mess were simply easier to handle on leather than on textiles. The trade-off is warmth: after long, still sits, the leather held more heat than the fabric options we tested.
What we liked
- Wipe-friendly leather for real-life messes
- Tailored support that feels good for longer upright sitting
- Compact footprint that doesn’t dominate a room
Who it is best for
- Apartments and smaller living rooms
- Buyers who want easy daily cleanup and a tidy look
- People who sit more upright than fully sprawled
Where it falls short
- Anyone who runs hot on leather during long sessions
- People who struggle with low seat heights
- Loungers who want a deep, nap-first sofa

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Top grain leather is easy to wipe down | Leather can feel warmer over time |
| Supportive, tailored sit for longer sessions | Low seat height can be tough on knees |
| More compact than the other models tested | Not built for full-body sprawl |

Details
- Price (listed, 75" option): $5,199.00
- Size options (listed): 75" or 90"
- Overall dimensions (75"): 75"W x 35"D x 28"H
- Seat depth (listed): ~24.5"
- Seat height (listed): ~17"
- Materials (listed): top grain leather, solid ash
- Seat construction (listed): S-spring
- Fill (listed): 100% polyurethane foam
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Assembly | 4.4 | Low-effort to place and get ready for use. |
| Cooling | 3.2 | Leather held more warmth during longer, still sessions. |
| Comfort | 3.7 | Best for a tailored sit; less rewarding for naps or deep lounging. |
| Durability | 4.4 | Structure felt sturdy and stayed consistent through repeat use. |
| Layout Practicality | 4.3 | Easier to place in smaller rooms than the larger, deeper models. |
| Cleaning | 4.6 | The easiest of the lineup for quick daily cleanup. |
| Value | 3.0 | Worth it if you want tailored leather; less compelling for loungers. |
| Overall | 3.9 | The best “easy upkeep” pick, with comfort trade-offs. |
Westwood 4-Piece Sectional
Our Testing Experience

Westwood is the “living room takeover” option—in a good way, if you have the space. The seat depth is the story: you naturally scoot back and settle in, and the ottoman makes it easy to stretch out without fighting for room.
For hosting, it was the simplest setup to live with because people naturally spread out and stay comfortable. The main downside is practicality: it’s a multi-piece sectional, and it feels heavy in both footprint and movement. Once it’s placed, you’ll want the layout to be right.
What we liked
- Massive lounge capacity for families and hosting
- Deep seat that rewards recline and stretched-out positions
- Removable cushions help with everyday living
Who it is best for
- Large living rooms and open-plan spaces
- Couples and families who lounge together nightly
- Hosts who want seating that encourages people to gather
Where it falls short
- Smaller rooms or tight walkways
- Petite users who dislike very deep seats
- Anyone who wants furniture that’s easy to reposition

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Huge seating area with real sprawl room | Footprint limits layout flexibility |
| Deep seat is excellent for lounging | Very deep seats won’t suit everyone |
| Removable cushions help daily upkeep | Multi-piece setup is heavier to adjust |

Details
- Price (listed): $6,499.99
- Overall dimensions: 117"W x 117"D x 31"H
- Seat depth: 31"
- Seat height: 18"
- Arm height from floor (listed): 24.5"
- Arm height from seat (listed): 7"
- Materials (listed): banak wood base, polyester upholstery
- Removable seat cushions (listed): yes
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Assembly | 4.0 | More steps than a sofa, but manageable with space and a plan. |
| Cooling | 3.8 | Average breathability; deep lounging can trap warmth. |
| Comfort | 4.7 | Excellent for stretched-out lounging and group seating. |
| Durability | 4.4 | Felt solid and stable through heavier daily use. |
| Layout Practicality | 4.1 | Flexible once placed, but the footprint demands thoughtful traffic flow. |
| Cleaning | 4.0 | Removable cushions help; large surface area increases routine effort. |
| Value | 4.3 | High payoff if your space and lifestyle match the scale. |
| Overall | 4.2 | The best choice here for hosting and nightly family lounging. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
| Kosa Sofa | 4.3 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.0 |
| Mazie Sofa | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Williams Leather Sofa | 3.9 | 3.7 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 3.2 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| Westwood 4-Piece Sectional | 4.2 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 3.7 |
On scores alone, Kosa and Westwood tie for top comfort—the difference is scale. Kosa is the better pick when you want “big sofa lounging,” while Westwood wins when you want the whole room to feel lounge-ready. Mazie is the steadiest all-arounder for mixed posture use. Williams is the utility specialist: easiest to clean and easiest to place in smaller rooms, but it gives up cooling and sink-in comfort to get there.
How to Choose the Four Hands Sofa?
Start with how you actually sit. If you recline often or nap on the sofa, lean toward deeper, lounge-first seating (Kosa or Westwood). If you spend real time sitting upright—working on a laptop or hosting guests—choose a steadier sit that won’t collapse your posture (Mazie, or Williams if you prefer leather). Next, match seat height to your mobility: Williams sits notably low, while Kosa’s seat height feels easier for frequent stand-ups. As a rule of thumb, petite users who dislike very deep seating usually do better with Mazie, while households that sprawl nightly tend to prefer Kosa or Westwood.
Limitations
This group skews either deep-lounge or low-profile. That’s great for style and relaxation, but it’s not ideal if you need a higher, upright “task sit.” Kosa and Westwood can overwhelm smaller rooms, and their deeper setups won’t work for every leg length. Williams is the easiest to keep clean, but it runs warmer and sits low. Mazie is the most balanced, but it rewards owners who are comfortable with a bit more upholstery care.
Four Hands Sofa Vs. Alternatives
Why consider these models
- Distinct silhouettes that look intentional in a room
- Strong lounge ergonomics in the deep-seat options
- Clear specialization: lounge-first (Kosa/Westwood) vs. tidy living (Williams) vs. balanced daily use (Mazie)
Alternatives to consider
- Crate & Barrel Lounge for a deep-seat vibe with a more mainstream sit profile
- Room & Board Metro for a more upright, posture-forward daily sit
- West Elm Harmony for a softer lounge feel in a widely available style
Pro Tips for Four Hands Sofa
- Measure doorways, stair turns, and elevator depth before delivery; deep sofas fail in hallways more often than people expect.
- If you do long laptop blocks, keep a small lumbar pillow nearby—deep, soft seats tend to pull your hips forward.
- Rotate seat positions weekly so one “favorite spot” doesn’t wear faster than the rest.
- Fluff and reset cushions on plush models after heavy lounging to keep the sit feeling even.
- Use a washable throw on the highest-contact zone (head/arm area) to cut down on oils and fabric wear.
- Put felt pads under legs to protect floors and reduce micro-sliding during sit-downs.
- For sectionals, tape out the footprint on the floor first so you don’t accidentally kill walkways.
- Keep a fabric-safe spot cleaner and a soft brush on hand; quick action prevents small messes from becoming permanent.
- If you run warm, consider lighter upholstery tones and breathable throws instead of heavy blankets.
FAQs
Which Four Hands Sofa is best for deep lounging and naps?
Kosa and Westwood performed best for long, reclined sessions and casual naps because their depth and cushion feel encourage full-body relaxation. Williams and Mazie are more satisfying when you want a steadier sit and smoother posture changes.
Which model is easiest to keep clean day to day?
Williams was the easiest for daily cleanup because leather lets you wipe away small spills and crumbs quickly. Kosa helps with removable casings, but fabric still demands more routine care.
Do these models work for couples sharing the same seat?
Westwood is the most couple-friendly for shared lounging because there’s room to shift without crowding. Kosa is also strong for two people, while Williams works best when you’re comfortable sitting closer rather than sprawling.