Your cart

Your cart is empty

We receive free products to review and participate in affiliate programs, where we are compensated for items purchased through links from our site. See our disclosure page for more information.

Sixpenny Sofa Reviews (2026)

Sixpenny’s lineup leans into relaxed, slipcovered comfort—mostly deep seats, soft cushions, and a lounge-first feel. Pricing typically starts around $2,499 and can climb into the $3,000s depending on size and upholstery. For this review, I focused on seat-depth fit, back support, heat buildup, cleaning, and day-to-day durability so you can pick the model that matches how you actually use a sofa.

Product Overview

Sofa Overall Score Pros Cons Ideal For Price
Neva Sofa 4.0 Plush, sink-in comfort; great for lounging Softer back support; needs regular fluffing Movie nights, napping, “cloud couch” feel From $2,599
Devyn Sofa 4.0 Extra-deep lounge posture; big-room presence Can feel oversized; depth can overwhelm petite users Sprawling, tall users, relaxed seating From $2,899
Aria Sofa 4.1 Deep seat with lumbar option; flexible posture Armless styling needs pillows; base cover is fixed Mixed postures, adjustable depth feel From $2,599
Amelia Sofa 4.1 More upright feel; better lumbar friendliness Less “sink-in” than others Long sitting sessions, balanced support From $2,499

Testing Team Takeaways

Across all four, the pattern stayed consistent: Neva and Devyn shine when you’re fully sprawled out, while Amelia made long, upright stretches easier because you don’t sink as far.

Aria sits in the middle—still plush, but the lumbar cushion changes the effective depth enough that both taller and shorter testers could find a workable posture. In real use, the right pick comes down to seat-depth tolerance, how much upright support you expect, and whether you’re willing to do the routine fluffing and slipcover care that comes with this comfort-first style.

Sixpenny Sofa Comparison Chart

Feature Neva Sofa (tested 84") Devyn Sofa (tested 84") Aria Sofa (tested 84") Amelia Sofa (tested 72")
Overall dimensions 84"W x 41"D x 33"H 84"W x 42"D x 32"H 84"W x 42"D x 35"H 72"W x 35"D x 33"H
Seat height 18" 18" 18" 17"
Seat depth (primary) 26" w/ back cushion; 35" w/o 26.5" w/ back cushion; 33.5" w/o 28" w/ back cushion (no lumbar); 23" w/ lumbar 23" w/ back cushion; 30" w/o
Cushion construction 60% foam / 40% loose fill seat; loose back 60% foam / 40% loose fill seat; loose back 60% foam / 40% loose fill seat; loose back 60% foam / 40% loose fill seat; loose back
Slipcover approach Loose design Loose design Fixed to base with velcro Loose design with pleated corners
Frame and suspension Hardwood/plywood; webbing & sinuous spring Hardwood/plywood; webbing & sinuous spring Hardwood/plywood; webbing & sinuous spring Hardwood/plywood; webbing & sinuous spring
Comfort posture (in use) Very lounge-y, soft-back feel Deep, laid-back lounge Deep but tunable with lumbar More upright, “sit-ready”
Cleaning practicality Strong day-to-day manageability with slipcover approach Similar to Neva, but larger surface area Cushions are easier than base Easier size-wise; corners add a bit of fuss

How We Tested It

We ran the same routine on each model: a delivery/setup reality check, long TV sessions and laptop work, and posture-hold tests to gauge lower-back and shoulder fatigue.

We also checked seat-depth fit across different heights, tracked warmth over 60–90 minute sits, ran quick cleanup drills with common household messes, and watched cushion recovery over repeated use. Each sofa was scored on a 1.0–5.0 scale across these metrics plus value.

Sixpenny Sofa: Our Testing Experience

Neva Sofa

Our Testing Experience

The first night I tried the Neva, I sat down to “just check the seat,” and ended up parked there long enough to forget about posture. My hips settled in, my shoulders dropped, and the back cushions encourage a soft, lounge-forward angle. The trade-off showed up later: during laptop work, I had to build my own support with a lumbar pillow, and if I stayed too relaxed I noticed a slow slide forward. Marcus loved the plush sprawl but kept calling out the upkeep—the cushions look best after a quick reset. Mia liked curling up, but the depth was a lot for shorter legs unless she tucked them under.

What we liked

  • Plush, sink-in comfort that makes movie nights and naps effortless

  • Deep seat that works well for curling up or leaning sideways

Who it is best for

  • Loungers who want softness and don’t need a firm, upright back

  • Homes that treat the sofa as the nightly landing zone

Where it falls short

  • Long upright work sessions without a lumbar pillow

  • Anyone who wants cushions to look crisp with minimal maintenance

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Extremely plush, lounge-friendly feel Softer back support for long upright sits
Deep seat works well for curling up Cushion upkeep is part of ownership
Slipcovered style fits casual spaces Depth can overwhelm shorter users

Details

  • Price: From $2,599

  • Tested size: 84" sofa; other sizes available

  • Overall dimensions (tested): 84"W x 41"D x 33"H

  • Seat height: 18"

  • Seat depth: 26" with back cushion; 35" without

  • Cushion construction: seat 60% foam / 40% loose fill; back cushions loose fill

  • Fill options: Feather Down or Poly Fill

  • Slipcover: loose design with oversized French seam

  • Frame: kiln-dried hardwood & plywood

  • Suspension: webbing & sinuous spring

  • Legs: solid rubberwood

  • Delivery: free threshold; optional white glove for $100

  • Returns: free within 30 days in original condition; packaging matters

  • Warranty: limited lifetime on core structural components; upholstery exclusions apply

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Assembly 3.8 Straightforward outcome, but bulky to maneuver
Cooling / Breathability 4.2 Breathes well in typical lounging sessions
Seat Comfort 4.8 The most “cloud-like” of the four
Back Support 3.6 Needs extra lumbar help for long upright sits
Seat Depth Fit 3.7 Great for lounging; too deep for some
Durability 3.9 Comfort-first cushions benefit from routine care
Ease of Movement / Repositioning 4.0 Easy to adjust pillows; base is substantial
Cleaning 4.3 Day-to-day care feels manageable with the style
Value 3.8 Premium comfort, premium spend
Overall Score 4.0 Best for people who prioritize softness over posture

Devyn Sofa

Our Testing Experience

Devyn felt like the “big lounge” take on a clean-lined sofa. It naturally pulls you into a reclined angle—great for movies, harder to hold when I tried to sit upright for laptop work. Carlos kept toggling between upright and relaxed; he liked the seat-to-back transition, but for longer work sessions he wanted a firmer anchor behind his mid-back. Jamal loved the legroom and how the depth fit his longer frame, but he also flagged the room-planning reality: this sofa needs space around it, otherwise it can dominate traffic flow.

What we liked

  • Extra-deep lounge posture that suits tall frames and sprawlers

  • Plush feel with a noticeable support layer underneath

Who it is best for

  • Taller users or anyone who naturally sits reclined

  • Large rooms where the scale feels intentional

Where it falls short

  • Shorter sitters who prefer a feet-on-floor posture

  • Smaller spaces where depth steals circulation space

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Deep, lounge-forward comfort Oversized in tighter rooms
Plush cushions with a support layer Depth can reduce upright ergonomics
Modern silhouette for large spaces Requires thoughtful layout planning

Details

  • Price: From $2,899

  • Tested size: 84" sofa; other sizes available

  • Overall dimensions (tested): 84"W x 42"D x 32"H

  • Seat height: 18"

  • Seat depth: 26.5" with back cushion; 33.5" without

  • Cushion construction: seat 60% foam / 40% loose fill; back cushions loose fill

  • Slipcover: loose design

  • Frame: kiln-dried hardwood & plywood

  • Suspension: webbing & sinuous spring

  • Legs: solid rubberwood

  • Delivery: free threshold; optional white glove for $100

  • Returns: free within 30 days in original condition; packaging matters

  • Warranty: limited lifetime on core structural components; upholstery exclusions apply

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Assembly 3.8 Manageable end result, but size raises the difficulty
Cooling / Breathability 4.1 Comfortable over long sits without feeling stuffy
Seat Comfort 4.6 Plush, lounge-first feel that stays inviting
Back Support 3.7 Better with a pillow for long upright sessions
Seat Depth Fit 3.6 Excellent for tall loungers; tricky for shorter legs
Durability 4.0 Holds shape well when rotated and maintained
Ease of Movement / Repositioning 3.9 Easy to settle in; harder to “sit proper” quickly
Cleaning 4.2 Practical, but larger surface area means more work
Value 3.7 You’re paying for scale and comfort
Overall Score 4.0 Best in big rooms with a relaxed seating style

Aria Sofa

Our Testing Experience

Aria surprised me with how adaptable it felt day to day. In a reclined movie posture it’s immediately plush, but the lumbar cushion changes the geometry when you switch into “work mode.” With the lumbar in place, I stopped sliding forward and my lower back stayed in a more comfortable curve. Jenna and Ethan ran their usual couple test—two people constantly changing positions, snack runs, and re-settling—and Aria handled the movement better than I expected because it’s easy to rebuild posture with pillows. The tradeoff is the armless styling: it looks clean, but you’ll rely on throw pillows if you like having an armrest anchor.

What we liked

  • Lumbar option that changes the effective depth

  • Easy to switch between lounging and semi-upright sitting

Who it is best for

  • Mixed-posture households (lounging plus laptop time)

  • People who like a clean, armless silhouette

Where it falls short

  • Anyone who leans on armrests for stability

  • Those who want the base slipcover to remove as easily as the cushions

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Lumbar option improves depth fit Armless design needs pillows for some users
Plush comfort without extreme sink Base cover is fixed to the frame
Flexible posture for couples Less “anchored” feel at the sides

Details

  • Price: From $2,599

  • Tested size: 84" sofa; other sizes available

  • Overall dimensions (tested): 84"W x 42"D x 35"H

  • Seat height: 18"

  • Seat depth: 28" with back cushion (no lumbar); 23" with lumbar

  • Cushion construction: seat 60% foam / 40% loose fill; back cushions loose fill

  • Slipcover: fixed design attached to base with velcro

  • Frame: kiln-dried hardwood & plywood

  • Suspension: webbing & sinuous spring

  • Connection hardware: zinc alligator clips

  • Delivery: free threshold; optional white glove for $100

  • Returns: free within 30 days in original condition; packaging matters

  • Warranty: limited lifetime on core structural components; upholstery exclusions apply

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Assembly 3.9 Reasonable, especially if you plan the path in advance
Cooling / Breathability 4.0 Stayed comfortable across longer sessions
Seat Comfort 4.5 Plush without feeling overly unstable
Back Support 3.8 Improved meaningfully with lumbar + pillow setup
Seat Depth Fit 4.2 One of the best depth “fit ranges” in practice
Durability 4.0 Solid day-to-day recovery with normal maintenance
Ease of Movement / Repositioning 4.2 Easy to change posture and rebuild support quickly
Cleaning 3.8 Cushions are easier than the fixed base cover
Value 3.8 Strong versatility for the spend
Overall Score 4.1 Best for people who shift positions a lot

Amelia Sofa

Our Testing Experience

Amelia was the one I reached for when I wanted to sit upright without fighting the cushions. The seat felt noticeably less “sink-in” than Neva or Devyn, and that changed everything for my lower back during longer stretches: I could type, stand up, and move around without the slow fight out of a deep cushion. Mia immediately commented that her feet felt more naturally placed because the depth didn’t demand a full curl-up posture. Marcus did his edge-perch test—tying shoes, quick stand-ups—and the front edge held its shape better than the cloudier models. The downside is simple: if your dream is an ultra-plush sprawl, Amelia reads more “structured cozy” than “marshmallow.”

What we liked

  • More upright posture and easier stand-up ergonomics

  • Shallower depth that works well for everyday sitting

Who it is best for

  • Long sitting sessions when you want reliable lumbar friendliness

  • Smaller spaces that can’t spare extra depth

Where it falls short

  • Shoppers chasing the softest, deepest lounge feel

  • People who want a naturally laid-back back angle

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
More upright, supportive sit Less “cloud couch” softness
Better depth fit for petite users Not the best for full sprawl lounging
Easier edge sitting and stand-up Cushions still benefit from routine care

Details

  • Price: From $2,499

  • Tested size: 72" sofa; other sizes available

  • Overall dimensions (tested): 72"W x 35"D x 33"H

  • Seat height: 17"

  • Seat depth: 23" with back cushion; 30" without

  • Cushion construction: seat 60% foam / 40% loose fill; back cushions loose fill

  • Slipcover: loose design with pleated corners

  • Frame: kiln-dried hardwood & plywood

  • Suspension: webbing & sinuous spring

  • Legs: solid rubberwood

  • Delivery: free threshold; optional white glove for $100

  • Returns: free within 30 days in original condition; packaging matters

  • Warranty: limited lifetime on core structural components; upholstery exclusions apply

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Assembly 4.0 Easier to live with in tighter spaces
Cooling / Breathability 4.2 Comfortable over long seated sessions
Seat Comfort 4.1 Supportive comfort that still feels inviting
Back Support 4.4 Best “sit-ready” posture of the group
Seat Depth Fit 4.3 Works well across a wider range of heights
Durability 4.1 Holds a cleaner silhouette with routine care
Ease of Movement / Repositioning 4.1 Easy to change positions without losing support
Cleaning 4.0 Manageable overall; corners add minor fuss
Value 3.8 A strong everyday pick at the entry price
Overall Score 4.1 Best balance for long sitting and real-life posture

Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas

Sofa Overall Score Seat Comfort Back Support Seat Depth Fit Cooling / Breathability Durability Ease of Movement / Repositioning
Neva Sofa 4.0 4.8 3.6 3.7 4.2 3.9 4.0
Devyn Sofa 4.0 4.6 3.7 3.6 4.1 4.0 3.9
Aria Sofa 4.1 4.5 3.8 4.2 4.0 4.0 4.2
Amelia Sofa 4.1 4.1 4.4 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.1

On scores alone, Amelia and Aria were the easiest to fit across different heights and sitting styles, with fewer workarounds during long sessions. Neva and Devyn still win if your priority is pure lounge comfort, but their softer back support and deeper profiles won’t suit everyone.

How to Choose a Sixpenny Sofa

Start with seat depth and your default posture. If you sit upright for long stretches—reading, laptop work, frequent up-and-down—prioritize Amelia’s shallower depth and more supportive feel.

If you live in a movie-night posture, Neva and Devyn reward you with a softer, deeper lounge for napping and curling up. If your household mixes postures (or you’re balancing tall and petite users), Aria’s lumbar setup helps tune the effective depth so fewer people feel mis-sized.

Dr. Adrian Walker’s guidance was simple: if your lower back complains, avoid living in a fully slouched angle night after night—choose the model that lets you hold a neutral pelvis without effort.

Limitations

These sofas are comfort-forward, which means softness and cushion maintenance come with the territory. Neva and Devyn are the least ideal for people who need firm, upright support without extra pillows, and their depth can overwhelm compact rooms. Aria’s armless design won’t satisfy anyone who depends on structured arm support. Amelia is the least appealing for shoppers who want the deepest, cloudiest sprawl.

Sixpenny Sofa Vs. Alternatives

  • Why choose these models

    • Deep-seat lounging with a relaxed, slipcovered look

    • Clear posture options: ultra-plush lounge vs. more upright sitting

    • Delivery options include free threshold and $100 white glove

  • Alternatives to consider

    • Restoration Hardware Cloud: similar sink-in concept with more configuration options

    • Crate & Barrel Lounge II: popular deep-seat option with a more mainstream showroom experience

    • Maiden Home Dune: tailored look with a more structured sit for posture-focused buyers

Pro Tips for Sixpenny Sofa

  • Measure doorways, hallway turns, and stairwells before ordering—depth is usually the hidden space killer.

  • If you’re between two depths, choose the one that lets your feet land naturally when you sit back.

  • Build a back-support kit: one lumbar pillow per frequent sitter can make soft sofas feel steadier.

  • Fluff and rotate cushions on a schedule you can keep—twice a week beats never.

  • Order swatches and choose fabric for real life: pets, snacks, and bare-skin comfort matter more than a perfect photo.

  • Keep a small upholstery brush or lint tool nearby; it resets the look in under a minute.

  • For couples, test your shared posture—one reclined, one upright—and choose the sofa that supports both without constant pillow rebuilding.

  • If you pay for white glove delivery at $100, think through packaging before you let it go.

  • Treat slipcover cleaning like planned laundry: spot clean early, and don’t wait for stains to set.

FAQs

Which Sixpenny sofa is best for lower-back sensitivity?

Amelia is the easiest to live with for long, upright sitting because the depth and posture feel more supportive. Aria can also work well if you consistently use the lumbar setup.

Which model feels the most like a “cloud couch”?

Neva delivered the plushest, most sink-in lounge feel in our rotation—especially for movie nights and naps.

I’m short—what’s the safest pick?

Amelia is the most natural fit for shorter legs. Aria can be a strong second choice when the lumbar cushion reduces the effective depth.

How long do I have to return a sofa?

Returns are available within 30 days in original condition, with practical considerations around packaging and delivery add-ons.

Previous post
Next post
Back to Best Sofa Reviews

Our Testing Team

Chris Miller

Lead Tester

Chris oversees the full testing pipeline for mattresses, sofas, and other home products. He coordinates the team, designs scoring frameworks, and lives with every product long enough to feel real strengths and weaknesses. His combination-sleeping and mixed lounging habits keep him focused on long-term comfort and support.

Marcus Reed

Heavyweight Sofa & Mattress Tester

Marcus brings a heavier build and heat-sensitive profile into every test. He pushes deep cushions, edges, and frames harder than most users. His feedback highlights whether a design holds up under load, runs hot, or collapses into a hammock-like slump during long gaming or streaming sessions.

Carlos Alvarez

Posture & Work-From-Home Specialist

Carlos spends long hours working from sofas and beds with a laptop. He tracks how mid-back, neck, and lumbar regions respond to different setups. His notes reveal whether a product keeps posture neutral during extended sitting or lying, and whether small adjustments still feel stable and controlled.

Mia Chen

Petite Side-Sleeper & Lounger

Mia tests how mattresses and sofas treat a smaller frame during side sleeping and curled-up lounging. She feels pressure and seat-depth problems very quickly. Her feedback exposes designs that swallow shorter users, leave feet dangling, or create sharp pressure points at shoulders, hips, and knees.

Jenna Brooks

Couple Comfort & Motion Tester

Jenna evaluates how well sofas and mattresses handle real shared use with a partner. She tracks motion transfer, usable width, and edge comfort when two adults spread out. Her comments highlight whether a product supports relaxed couple lounging, easy repositioning, and quiet nights without constant disturbance.

Jamal Davis

Tall, Active-Body Tester

Jamal brings a tall, athletic frame and post-workout soreness into the lab. He checks seat depth, leg support, and surface responsiveness on every product. His notes show whether cushions bounce back, frames feel solid under long legs, and sleep surfaces support joints during recovery stretches and naps.

Ethan Cole

Restless Lounger & Partner Tester

Ethan acts as the moving partner in many couple-focused tests. He shifts positions frequently and pays attention to how easily a surface lets him turn, slide, or return after short breaks. His feedback exposes cushions that feel too squishy, too sticky, or poorly shaped for real-world lounging patterns.