I started this project with one question: when people talk about “that Marriott bed,” what mattress did they actually sleep on? Guests remember the comfort, but they rarely know the model—so recreating that feel at home becomes guesswork.
To close that gap, our team tested four Marriott-brand mattresses that consumers can buy. Instead of quick showroom impressions, we rotated each bed through real bedrooms for weeks—regular workdays, late-night scrolling, and normal bedding—until the initial novelty wore off and the patterns stayed consistent.
Product Overview
| Mattress | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price (Queen, approx.) | Overall Score |
| Marriott Foam Mattress | Strong motion isolation; steady medium-firm support; familiar hotel feel | Edges compress more for heavier bodies; not very springy | Couples, combo sleepers, lighter to average bodies | $1,995 before discounts | 4.2 / 5 |
| Marriott Innerspring Mattress | Buoyant support; better airflow; solid edges | More motion transfer; less “hug” around joints | Back sleepers, heavier folks, hot sleepers | $1,995 before discounts | 4.2 / 5 |
| Ritz-Carlton Mattress | Deep cushioning; strong underlying support; luxury finish | Very expensive; purchase policies are stricter than most online brands | Luxury shoppers, side sleepers, primary bedrooms | $3,440 before discounts | 4.6 / 5 |
| Sheraton Mattress | Plush top over pocket coils; supportive, balanced feel | Noticeable bounce for light sleepers | Guests rooms, couples who like some bounce | $1,995 before discounts | 4.1 / 5 |
Testing Team Takeaways
This round was less about chasing trendy features and more about recreating a familiar hotel feel. The Marriott Foam Mattress stayed quiet and steady, while the innerspring version added bounce, stronger edges, and better airflow.
Marcus sat higher on the Marriott Innerspring Mattress, which helped his hips on stomach-heavy nights. He liked the “on top” feel, but the foam model held more heat for him.
Mia favored the Ritz-Carlton Mattress for its thicker top and deeper shoulder relief. She felt more pressure on the firmer innerspring, and the foam model landed in the middle.
Jenna tracked partner movement closely. She rated the Marriott Foam Mattress as the calmest for motion isolation, while the Sheraton felt supportive but bouncier.
Marriott Mattress Comparison Chart
| Mattress | Type | Firmness (1–10, est.) | Approx. Height | Available Sizes | Core Materials | Cooling Performance (lab impression) | Support Character | Pressure Relief Character | Responsiveness | Motion Isolation | Durability Outlook |
| Marriott Foam Mattress | All-foam hotel mattress | 6–6.5 medium-firm | About 12" | Twin–Cal king | High-density polyurethane foams | Slightly above average; foam feels dense, surface stays moderate | Even, gradual support across torso | Gentle contouring, mild cradle | Slower response for foams, not bouncy | Strong isolation for partners | Dense build should age steadily |
| Marriott Innerspring Mattress | Hotel innerspring | 6.5–7 medium-firm | About 13" | Twin–Cal king | Coil core with comfort foams | Better airflow through coil unit | Lifted feel under hips and back | Moderate cushioning over a firmer base | Quick surface reset, clear bounce | More movement felt across surface | Classic coil frame should hold shape |
| Ritz-Carlton Mattress | Hybrid-style innerspring | 6 medium | About 13–14" | Twin–Cal king | Wrapped pocket coils plus multiple foam layers | Breathes well for a thick build, though richer foams can hold some warmth | Strong, supportive base with a softer top | Deep cushion for shoulders and hips | Responsive yet controlled pushback | Good isolation for a coil design | Premium build aimed at long service life |
| Sheraton Mattress | Pocket-coil plush innerspring | 6 medium | About 13" | Twin–Cal king | Individually wrapped springs, plush quilted top | Air moves through coil core easily | Steady mid-section support | Softer top, moderate contour | Noticeable bounce, easy to move | Some motion passes between partners | Reinforced coils should resist early sag |
What We Tested and How We Tested It
We treated these Marriott models like real beds, not showroom samples. Each mattress spent at least three weeks in active rotation inside everyday bedrooms, under normal work schedules, late-night scrolling, and early alarms. Mattresses moved between testers so every body type met every surface.
We logged daily notes on pressure relief, lumbar support, perceived cooling, and responsiveness (ease of movement). Those notes sat next to simple measurements, including sink depth under hips and shoulders, firmness checks, and edge support under different body weights. We also watched for early changes in quilting and top foam—flattening, shifting, or any “new bed” softening that happened too quickly.
Noise and motion isolation (partner disturbance) stayed under close watch as well. Jenna and Marcus focused on entry-and-exit movement, while I timed how quickly each surface recovered after deeper compressions. Those observations fed directly into the scoring tables later in this review.
Related Post: How We Test Mattresses
Marriott Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Marriott Foam Mattress
Our Testing Experience
My first night on the Marriott Foam Mattress felt like a firm base with a slow, shallow cradle at the shoulders. On my back, my hips stayed level; on my side, the contour stayed modest, which kept my spine aligned without a “stuck” feel.
Marcus noticed warmth building under heavier bedding and felt less secure sitting near the edge. He still liked the stable support for stomach and back sleep.
At Mia’s lighter weight, the bed read firmer. She could side-sleep without immediate numbness, but very long stretches brought a mild warning at the outer hip.
In shared-bed testing, Jenna said movement stayed localized and faded quickly, even when her partner climbed in late.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Strong motion isolation for couples | Edge support feels weaker for heavy bodies |
| Medium-firm feel suits many sleepers | Surface runs warmer for heat-sensitive people |
| All-foam design mimics a familiar hotel vibe | Less bounce for those who like springy beds |
Details
- Price (queen): about $1,995 before promotions
- Firmness: medium-firm, around 6–6.5 on a 10-point scale
- Type: high-density all-foam Marriott hotel mattress
- Available sizes: twin through California king
- Construction: dense support core with comfort foams, simple stacked design
- Cooling: moderate performance; denser foams held more warmth for heat-prone testers
- Pressure relief: gentle cradle for average bodies, slightly firm for very light sleepers
- Responsiveness: slower surface reset than coils, yet movement still manageable
- Durability: dense core suggests solid long-term support if rotated occasionally
- Motion isolation: very strong, well suited for restless partners
- Shipping: typically ships by carrier; delivery approach depends on checkout options
- Trial period: do not expect a lengthy in-home trial through typical hotel-store channels
- Warranty: 10-year warranty against major defects
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Support | 4.2 | Stable for back/side sleep at average weights. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.4 | Good cushioning; lighter sleepers felt firmer. |
| Cooling | 3.8 | Foam warmed up for hot sleepers. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.5 | Excellent; movement stayed localized. |
| Durability | 4.2 | Dense core resisted early compression. |
| Responsiveness | 3.7 | Slow rebound; still easy enough to move. |
| Edge Support | 3.6 | Edge compresses more for heavier sitters. |
| Value | 4.0 | Premium price; best if you want hotel-style foam. |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Balanced; standout motion isolation. |
Marriott Innerspring Mattress
Our Testing Experience
After weeks on foam, the Marriott Innerspring Mattress immediately felt higher and more responsive. On my back, it held my hips up; on my side, it cushioned, but it did not sink as deeply as the Ritz.
Marcus preferred it for stomach-heavy nights and warm rooms, trading some motion transfer for better edge stability and airflow.
Carlos focused on back alignment and found the support stayed consistent over time. Side sleeping was workable, but he favored it for back-dominant nights.
Jenna felt more partner movement than on the foam bed, but still considered it a solid option for couples who like bounce.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Stronger edge support than the foam model | More motion felt when partners move |
| Buoyant feel that suits back and stomach sleepers | Slightly firm for very light side sleepers |
| Better airflow through the coil unit | Less hugging contour around joints |
Details
- Price (queen): about $1,995 before holiday discounts
- Firmness: medium-firm to firm, around 6.5–7
- Type: traditional hotel innerspring mattress with comfort foam layers
- Sizes: twin through California king
- Construction: coil support core under foam and quilting layers
- Cooling: stronger airflow than the foam version during our tests
- Pressure relief: moderate cushioning, better for average and heavier bodies
- Responsiveness: quick response, easy repositioning for restless sleepers
- Durability: robust coil unit handled repeated edge-sitting and kneeling
- Motion isolation: moderate; some transfer across the surface with active partners
- Shipping: typically ships by carrier and may take longer than bed-in-a-box brands
- Trial period: do not expect an extended sleep trial through typical hotel-store channels
- Warranty: 10-year coverage similar to the foam model
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Support | 4.4 | Lifted support, especially for heavier bodies. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.0 | Moderate cushioning; firmer for light side sleepers. |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Strong airflow through the coil core. |
| Motion Isolation | 3.8 | Some transfer, typical for coils. |
| Durability | 4.3 | Coil unit stayed stable under stress. |
| Responsiveness | 4.4 | Fast rebound; easy repositioning. |
| Edge Support | 4.4 | Solid edge for sitting and sleeping. |
| Value | 4.1 | Great for lift and airflow at this price. |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Supportive, bouncy hotel innerspring. |
Ritz-Carlton Mattress
Our Testing Experience
The Ritz-Carlton Mattress delivered the deepest cushion in this group: a plush top over a supportive coil base. My shoulders sank in without my hips collapsing, which eased morning tightness.
Mia called it the most comfortable for side sleep, saying the top layers finally gave her shoulder room.
Marcus liked the support but found it warmer than the simpler innerspring, making it better for cooler seasons or strong AC.
Carlos noted steady alignment and less coil noise than he expected.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Deep, plush pressure relief with strong underlying support | Very high price point |
| Pocket coils plus foams balance bounce and isolation | Purchase policies are less forgiving than most online brands |
| Luxury finish suits primary bedrooms | Runs warmer for heavier or hot sleepers |
Details
- Price (queen): about $3,440 before rare sales
- Firmness: medium, near 6 on a typical 10-point scale
- Type: hybrid-style innerspring with multiple foam layers over pocket coils
- Sizes: twin through California king
- Construction: wrapped coils, pressure-relieving foams, plush quilted top
- Cooling: breathable for a thick build, though warmer than simpler coil designs for heat-prone testers
- Pressure relief: standout contouring for shoulders and hips, especially for side sleepers
- Responsiveness: moderate bounce with controlled sink, easy rotation between positions
- Durability: premium materials and thicker profile showed strong resilience in our checks
- Motion isolation: above average for a coil bed in shared-bed sessions
- Shipping: made-to-order style ordering with longer lead times than standard delivery
- Trial period: do not expect a traditional sleep trial through typical hotel-store channels
- Warranty: 10-year warranty against major defects
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Support | 4.7 | Supportive base with plush surface comfort. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.8 | Deep contouring for shoulders and hips. |
| Cooling | 4.5 | Breathes well; foams add mild warmth. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | Good isolation for a coil bed. |
| Durability | 4.7 | Sturdy build; resilient under compression. |
| Responsiveness | 4.3 | Easy to move with controlled bounce. |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | Strong, stable perimeter. |
| Value | 3.9 | Excellent feel, but expensive. |
| Overall Score | 4.6 | Top-tier pressure relief and refinement. |
Sheraton Mattress
Our Testing Experience
The Sheraton Mattress felt plush at first touch but more straightforward underneath than the Ritz. The coil system kept my mid-section lifted, and the bounce made turning easy.
In Jenna’s shared-bed tests, it was bouncier than foam but not wildly disruptive.
Jamal liked the responsive pushback and stable edge, especially after workouts.
Marcus found it supportive enough to avoid sag, but it still warmed up more than the Marriott Innerspring under heavy blankets.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Plush quilted top with supportive pocket coils | More motion transfer than all-foam Marriott model |
| Comfortable for back and combination sleepers | Side sleepers seeking deep contour may want thicker cushioning |
| Pricing undercuts Ritz-Carlton Mattress | Heat-prone sleepers may notice mild warmth with heavy bedding |
Details
- Price (queen): about $1,995 before periodic discounts
- Firmness: true medium feel, around 6
- Type: pocket-coil innerspring with plush quilted cover
- Sizes: twin through California king in most regions
- Construction: individually wrapped coils, foam comfort layers, quilted top fabric
- Cooling: air moves through the coil core; plush top can hold mild warmth
- Pressure relief: comfortable for many back and combo sleepers, moderate for strict side sleepers
- Responsiveness: noticeable bounce; active bodies move easily across the surface
- Durability: wrapped coil system and reinforced build showed strong resilience in tests
- Motion isolation: better than basic open coils, yet not as quiet as dense foam
- Shipping: sold through brand retail channels; availability and delivery can vary by region
- Trial period: do not expect a generous in-home trial through typical hotel-store channels
- Warranty: 10-year warranty on manufacturing defects
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Support | 4.3 | Steady pocket-coil support across positions. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.1 | Plush top; less deep than Ritz. |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Good airflow; top can warm slightly. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Moderate; more movement than foam. |
| Durability | 4.3 | Resilient coil system in our checks. |
| Responsiveness | 4.1 | Bouncy feel; easy movement. |
| Edge Support | 4.2 | Stable edge for most sleepers. |
| Value | 4.0 | Good balance for a lower price. |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Strong fit for guest rooms and shared beds. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
| Marriott Foam Mattress | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 3.7 |
| Marriott Innerspring Mattress | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 4.4 |
| Ritz-Carlton Mattress | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.3 |
| Sheraton Mattress | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.1 |
On paper and in practice, the Ritz-Carlton Mattress sits ahead on pressure relief and overall refinement. The Marriott Foam Mattress remains the quietest choice for motion isolation, especially for light sleepers and couples. The Marriott Innerspring Mattress and Sheraton Mattress cluster closer together, leaning into lift, airflow, and easier movement rather than deep, plush contouring.
Best Picks
-
Best all-foam hotel feel: Marriott Foam Mattress
This model stood out for steady, medium-firm support and excellent motion control. It fits couples and combination sleepers who want a familiar hotel feel without a lot of bounce. -
Best for supportive bounce: Marriott Innerspring Mattress
Heavier testers and back-dominant sleepers gravitated toward this bed. Its lifted feel, strong perimeter, and better airflow make it a practical everyday workhorse. -
Best luxury pressure relief: Ritz-Carlton Mattress
Side sleepers and comfort-focused shoppers viewed this as the most indulgent option. The plush top and pocket-coil base delivered the richest cushioning, though the price keeps it firmly in luxury territory. -
Best plush support for guest spaces: Sheraton Mattress
If you want a softer first impression without losing structure underneath, the Sheraton is the most balanced “plush-but-supportive” feel we tested. It makes sense for guest rooms and for sleepers who like a little bounce for easier movement.
How to Choose the Marriott Mattress?
Shoppers reading Marriott mattress reviews usually chase a specific memory. Some remember a buoyant hotel bed after a long conference, while others recall a softer, pillow-top feel from a resort stay. Matching that memory starts with sleep position, body weight, and temperature sensitivity.
If you’re a lighter side sleeper, a stable surface that still cushions the shoulder tends to matter more than bounce. In our group, the Ritz-Carlton Mattress fit that profile best, with the Marriott Foam Mattress as a more restrained alternative.
For average-weight back sleepers, the Marriott Innerspring Mattress struck the strongest balance of lift and easy movement. The Sheraton Mattress also works here if you prefer a plusher first impression, but still want a supportive coil base.
For a hot sleeper, airflow usually outranks dense contouring. Based on our testing, the Marriott Innerspring Mattress and Sheraton Mattress sit ahead of the foam model here. Their coil systems moved heat away from hips and backs faster, which Marcus noticed during warmer nights.
Heavier couples usually need a stable edge plus enough motion control to prevent nightly disruptions. The Marriott Innerspring Mattress offers the most robust perimeter for sitting and spreading out, while the Marriott Foam Mattress calms partner movement more effectively. The “right” call depends on whether you prioritize edge stability or a quieter surface.
Related Post: What Mattress to Buy
Limitations
These Marriott options come with clear tradeoffs. None of them target an ultra-firm, board-like feel. And while they’re built to mimic hotel comfort, the pricing typically sits at (or above) many mid-market hybrids, which will put them out of range for strict budget shoppers.
Very heavy sleepers above common weight ranges may still prefer specialty mattresses designed specifically for higher loads. Our heavier tester found acceptable support, but people far heavier than him may want reinforced plus-size models from dedicated brands. And if you love extremely bouncy, old-school open-coil beds, these more refined hotel constructions can feel restrained.
Finally, the lack of generous sleep trials creates real risk. If you’re used to online brands with long trial windows, hotel-store policies can feel much less forgiving.
Policies at a Glance
| Mattress | Shipping (Cost / Region) | Trial Period | Return Policy / Fees | Warranty Length | Notable Conditions |
| Marriott Foam Mattress | Sold through hotel retail channels; shipping fees and regions vary at checkout | No extended sleep trial | Policies are typically strict; check checkout terms before ordering | 10 years | Choose firmness and size carefully; flexibility after purchase may be limited |
| Marriott Innerspring Mattress | Similar hotel-store delivery approach; timing can run longer than bed-in-a-box brands | No extended sleep trial | Policies are typically strict; check checkout terms before ordering | 10 years | Some versions are made-to-order style, which can reduce post-order changes |
| Ritz-Carlton Mattress | Made-to-order style ordering; longer lead times are common | No sleep trial | Policies are typically strict; check checkout terms before ordering | 10 years | High-commitment purchase; plan sizing and feel carefully before checkout |
| Sheraton Mattress | Sold through brand retail channels; availability and delivery can vary by region | No formal trial period | Policies are typically strict; check checkout terms before ordering | 10 years | Construction may vary by region; review local specs before purchase |
Across these Marriott-brand choices, policies tend to resemble traditional retail rules more than online “sleep at home for months” flexibility. Before you commit, pay close attention to delivery timing, warranty coverage, and the exact checkout terms for cancellations and returns.
Related Post: Mattress Warranty Guide
Related Post: Mattress Trial Guide
FAQs
Are Marriott Mattresses worth buying for home use?
They can be a good buy if you want a familiar hotel feel and you’re comfortable with stricter purchase terms. In our tests, the foam and innerspring models delivered steady support and predictable comfort, but you should not expect a generous in-home trial.
Which Marriott Mattress feels closest to typical Marriott hotel beds?
In our experience, the Marriott Foam Mattress and Marriott Innerspring Mattress come closest to the “standard Marriott room” feel, with the foam option emphasizing motion control and the innerspring emphasizing bounce and lift.
Which Marriott Mattress works best for side sleepers?
Side sleepers in our tests favored the Ritz-Carlton Mattress for deeper shoulder and hip relief, with the Marriott Foam Mattress acting as a firmer, more budget-friendly secondary option.
Do Marriott Mattresses sleep hot?
The all-foam model ran slightly warmer for heavier or hot sleepers in our group, while the innerspring and Sheraton models stayed cooler thanks to airflow through their coil cores.
Can I return a Marriott Mattress if I do not like it?
Return and cancellation terms vary by channel, but these purchases typically come with stricter policies than online mattress brands. Treat it as a higher-commitment purchase and confirm the checkout terms before ordering.
How long should a Marriott Mattress last?
Based on construction quality and our compression checks, these mattresses should provide several years of consistent support. Rotating the mattress occasionally can help the comfort layers wear more evenly. For deeper context, see Mattress Last Duration and Durability Explained.
Which Marriott Mattress suits heavier sleepers best?
In our group, Heavier testers preferred the Marriott Innerspring Mattress thanks to its lifted feel under the hips and its stronger edge structure.
Is the Ritz-Carlton Mattress worth the extra money?
If you prioritize luxury pressure relief, refined support, and premium finishes, the Ritz-Carlton Mattress can justify its cost. If you’re more budget-focused, the Marriott Foam Mattress or Sheraton Mattress will feel more reasonable while still delivering a hotel-style experience.
Do these Marriott Mattresses arrive compressed in a box?
Shipping methods vary by model and fulfillment, but these mattresses are often delivered by carrier rather than the typical doorstep bed-in-a-box setup. Confirm the delivery method at checkout so you can plan for access and space.
Which Marriott Mattress works best for couples?
For couples sensitive to movement, the Marriott Foam Mattress earned the highest marks in motion isolation. If you want more bounce without giving up too much motion control, the Ritz-Carlton Mattress balanced both better than the innerspring model.
