My team and I spent the last month immersed in the distinct aesthetic of Kardiel furniture. We wanted to see if these style-forward pieces offered real comfort or just looked good in photos. We ordered seven of their most popular models to our testing studio. We unpacked them, assembled the legs, and integrated them into our daily routines. We lived with the bold colors and architectural shapes to understand the ownership experience.
The testing process involved our entire seven-person team and our clinical advisor. We rotated through each sofa for days at a time. We watched movies, worked on laptops, and hosted mock gatherings to test conversation flow. I paid close attention to the fabric quality and cushion resilience. We wanted to see if the mid-century designs supported our backs after hours of sitting.
We aimed to look past the beautiful product photography. We checked for frame creaks and fabric pilling. Dr. Adrian Walker observed our postures to identify potential ergonomic red flags. We measured the actual seat depths and heights. Our goal is to give you a clear, unfiltered picture of what it is like to own a kardiel sofa.
Product Overview
| Sofa Model | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price | Overall Score |
| Nordic 82" Sofa | Iconic style, high-quality fabric, sturdy frame | Very firm seat, low backrest | MCM enthusiasts, formal living | $$ | 4.6 |
| Woodstock 87" Sofa | Luxurious velvet, unique curved shape | Hard to nap on, specific aesthetic | Social lounges, statement pieces | $$ | 4.5 |
| Newport 118" Modular | Deep seating, reconfigurable, soft feel | Large footprint, low seat height | Lounging families, open spaces | $$$ | 4.7 |
| Domino 90" Sofa | Sleek low profile, wide armrests | Minimal back support, heavy visual weight | Modern minimalist lofts | $$ | 4.4 |
| Hugh 86" Sofa | Classic button tufting, supportive back | Seat cushions slide slightly | Vintage lovers, offices | $$ | 4.5 |
| Woodrow Box 87" Leather | Stunning wood frame, premium leather | Very upright sit, firm suspension | Formal sitting rooms | $$$ | 4.6 |
| Jackie 77" Sofa | Compact size, charming retro look | Narrow seating depth | Small apartments, entryways | $ | 4.3 |
Kardiel Sofa Comparison Chart
| Feature | Nordic | Woodstock | Newport | Domino | Hugh | Woodrow Box | Jackie |
| Width | 82 inches | 87 inches | 118 inches | 90 inches | 86 inches | 87 inches | 77 inches |
| Depth | 35 inches | 37 inches | 41 inches | 38 inches | 35 inches | 32 inches | 32 inches |
| Seat Height | 18 inches | 17 inches | 16 inches | 16.5 inches | 18 inches | 17.5 inches | 18 inches |
| Upholstery | Tweed/Blend | Velvet | Performance | Boucle/Fabric | Fabric | Aniline Leather | Fabric |
| Firmness | Firm | Medium | Soft/Medium | Medium-Firm | Medium-Firm | Firm | Firm |
| Back Style | Loose Cushion | Tight Back | Loose Cushion | Low Tight Back | Tufted Loose | Loose Cushion | Tufted Tight |
| Legs | Walnut Stain | Gold/Metal | Hidden | Hidden | Walnut Stain | Wood Base | Walnut Stain |
| Assembly | Legs only | Legs only | Clips | Fully Assembled | Legs only | Legs only | Legs only |
What We Tested and How We Tested It
We established a comprehensive testing protocol for these design-centric sofas. We focused heavily on the balance between aesthetics and actual livability. We sat on each model for minimum four-hour blocks. I monitored how the foam density reacted to body heat and prolonged pressure. We tested different postures including upright working, slouching relaxation, and horizontal napping.
We evaluated the fabrics for texture and durability. We rubbed denim samples against the upholstery to check for dye transfer. We used a standardized weight drop to test the suspension bounce. Marcus and Jamal tested the frame rigidity by sitting heavily on the armrests and front rails. We checked the stability of the legs on both carpet and hardwood floors.
Dr. Walker analyzed the ergonomic support of each profile. He looked at the seat angle and back height relationships. We measured the functional seat depth versus the advertised specs. We noted how easy it was to stand up from the lower models. We tracked how much the back cushions compressed and if they needed frequent fluffing.
Testing Team Takeaways
I found the Kardiel lineup visually striking. The colors are vibrant and the shapes are distinct. I noticed that most models lean towards a firmer, supportive sit. This is typical for the mid-century style. I appreciated the high-quality fabrics that felt substantial to the touch. I did find that some low-back models offered limited shoulder support for my frame.
Marcus Reed really tested the structural integrity. He was impressed by the solid wood elements in the Woodrow and Nordic. “I don't feel any wobbling when I shift my weight,” he noted. He did mention that the velvet on the Woodstock retained some body heat. He found the deep seats of the Newport much more accommodating for his size. He struggled slightly with the narrow depth of the Jackie.
Carlos Alvarez focused on his workspace ergonomics. He loved the upright posture of the Woodrow Box. “I can type here without hunching over,” he said. He found the Domino too low for productive work. He felt his knees were too high relative to his hips. He liked the firm support of the Nordic for reading documents.
Mia Chen gravitated towards the aesthetics. She loved the curve of the Woodstock. “It feels glamorous and cozy at the same time,” she remarked. She found the Newport sections heavy to move but loved the nest-like feel. She noted that the coarser tweeds on the Hugh felt a bit scratchy on bare legs. She fit perfectly on the compact Jackie sofa.
Jenna Brooks looked at the couple's utility. She found the Woodstock awkward for cuddling due to the curve. She preferred the expansive flat surface of the Newport. “We can both lay here without touching,” she laughed. She noted that the motion transfer on the Nordic was minimal. She liked that the cushions didn't separate when they sat together.
Jamal Davis needed legroom. He found the Jackie and Woodrow a bit tight. His knees extended far past the seat edge. He loved the Newport. “Finally a seat depth that fits my thigh length,” he said. He found the armrests on the Domino too low to be useful. He appreciated the sturdy feel of the Nordic when he pushed off to stand.
Ethan Cole tested the lounge factor. He tried to nap on every sofa. He found the tufted buttons on the Hugh slightly annoying against his face. He loved the flat bench seat of the Domino. “It’s basically a twin bed in the living room,” he noted. He found the velvet on the Woodstock slippery when he wore track pants.
Kardiel Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Nordic 82" Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
I started our testing with the Nordic, the brand's signature piece. The splayed legs and angular arms scream mid-century modern. I sat down and felt immediate resistance. The cushions are firm. I did not sink in. This kept my spine aligned but felt stark. I spent an evening reading a book. The armrest height was perfect for my elbow. I felt supported.
Marcus sat down heavily next to me. The frame did not creak. “This feels like a piece of furniture that lasts,” he said. He ran his hand over the fabric. It is a tight weave. He noted it felt durable but stiff. He tried to slouch for gaming. The low back made it difficult. He couldn't rest his head.
Mia curled up in the corner. She tucked her legs under her. “The seat is wide enough for me to sit cross-legged,” she observed. She liked the clean lines. She noted the fabric didn't bunch up when she moved. She felt the cushion piping pressed into her leg after an hour.
Dr. Walker observed our posture from the side. He pointed out the slight backward angle of the seat. He noted this promotes a relaxed pelvic tilt. He warned that the lack of upper back support could cause neck strain. I tried to nap on it. The single bench cushion is great. I did not fall into a crack.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Stunning mid-century silhouette | Seat cushioning is quite firm |
| High-quality durable fabric | Low back offers no head support |
| Sturdy solid wood frame | Fabric can feel slightly rough |
| Spacious bench-style seat | Armrests are hard and angular |
Details
-
Price: $$
-
Dimensions: 82" W x 35" D x 33" H
-
Seat Depth: 22 inches
-
Seat Height: 18 inches
-
Upholstery: Premium Tweed or Poly-blend
-
Frame: Kiln-Dried Hardwood
-
Cushion: High Density Foam
-
Legs: Walnut Stain Wood
-
Warranty: 3-Year Limited
-
Shipping: Curbside or White Glove
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Comfort | 4.2 | Firm support, not for cloud-lovers. |
| Support | 4.6 | Excellent posture maintenance. |
| Durability | 4.8 | Frame and fabric feel bulletproof. |
| Aesthetics | 4.9 | Defines the MCM genre perfectly. |
| Value | 4.5 | High quality materials for the price. |
| Overall | 4.6 | The quintessential modern classic. |
Woodstock 87" Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
I was drawn to the Woodstock's dramatic curve. The velvet upholstery shimmered under our studio lights. I sat in the center. The curve naturally angled me towards the room. It felt social. The seat is medium-firm. It is softer than the Nordic. I felt a bit of plushness on top. I tried to use my laptop. The curved front made positioning the table tricky.
Jenna and Ethan sat on the ends. They were angled towards each other. “It’s perfect for talking, bad for TV,” Jenna laughed. She stroked the velvet. She found it incredibly soft. Ethan tried to lay down. The curve forced him into a fetal position. He couldn't stretch straight out.
Marcus tested the gold legs. He shook the sofa. It felt stable despite the delicate look. He noted the velvet warmed up quickly. “I am getting sweaty on my back,” he commented after thirty minutes. He liked the continuous backrest. It acted as an armrest when he turned sideways.
Dr. Walker looked at the seat height. He noted it is slightly lower than standard. He watched Carlos struggle to stand up. He advised that this sofa is better for active sitting than lounging. I found the vertical channel tufting very stylish. It did not dig into my back.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Unique conversation-starting shape | Curved shape limits layout options |
| Velvet feels luxurious and soft | Not suitable for sleeping |
| Good for social interaction | Retains body heat significantly |
| Stable metal leg structure | Difficult to place a coffee table |
Details
-
Price: $$
-
Dimensions: 87" W x 37" D x 29" H
-
Seat Depth: 23 inches (varies by curve)
-
Seat Height: 17 inches
-
Upholstery: Performance Velvet
-
Frame: Hardwood
-
Cushion: Multi-density Foam
-
Legs: Gold or Chrome Finish
-
Warranty: 3-Year Limited
-
Shipping: Large box delivery
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Comfort | 4.4 | Soft touch but awkward for napping. |
| Support | 4.3 | Good lower back support. |
| Durability | 4.5 | Velvet seems stain resistant. |
| Aesthetics | 4.8 | A true statement piece. |
| Value | 4.4 | You pay for the unique design. |
| Overall | 4.5 | The social butterfly's choice. |
Newport 118" Modular Sectional
Our Testing Experience:
I felt small sitting on the Newport. It is massive. The modular pieces clip together. I arranged it into a long sofa first. The fabric is a soft weave. It feels inviting. I sank into the cushions. This is the softest Kardiel model we tested. I spent a Sunday afternoon napping. It was delightful. My hips were cushioned.
Jamal stretched his legs out. He had room to spare. “I can fit my whole body here,” he said happily. He used the wide armrest as a pillow. He noted the low back required him to slouch to get shoulder support. He moved the ottoman to create a chaise. He liked the flexibility.
Mia sat in the middle. She looked tiny. “It’s like a playpen,” she joked. She found the seat depth very deep. Her feet dangled. She had to use a throw pillow behind her back. She liked the casual vibe. She noticed the fabric trapped some lint.
Dr. Walker warned about the low seat height. He watched Marcus struggle to get up. He noted that the deep sink could strain the lower back over time. I found the connectors easy to use. The pieces didn't drift apart. The cushions needed fluffing after a few days.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Incredible lounging depth | Very large footprint required |
| Soft, sink-in comfort | Low back offers minimal support |
| Modular flexibility | Seat cushions need regular fluffing |
| Wide, usable armrests | Hard to get out of for some |
Details
-
Price: $$$
-
Dimensions: 118" W x 41" D x 28" H
-
Seat Depth: 28 inches (Deep)
-
Seat Height: 16 inches (Low)
-
Upholstery: Performance Fabric
-
Frame: Solid Wood
-
Cushion: Feather & Foam Blend
-
Legs: Concealed
-
Warranty: 3-Year Limited
-
Shipping: Multiple boxes
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Comfort | 4.9 | The ultimate lounge experience. |
| Support | 3.8 | Lacks structure for upright sitting. |
| Durability | 4.5 | Fabric holds up to friction. |
| Aesthetics | 4.7 | Modern, relaxed, and expensive looking. |
| Value | 4.6 | High versatility for the cost. |
| Overall | 4.7 | Best for movie nights and naps. |
Domino 90" Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
I was struck by the Domino's architectural profile. It sits very low to the ground. It looks like a block of design. I sat down. The motion was controlled. The foam is dense. I felt stable. The backrest is low and thick. I rested my arm on the top. It felt natural. I tried to work on my laptop. The low height made my knees point up. It was uncomfortable for typing.
Carlos tried to find a comfortable position. He shifted constantly. “My back has nowhere to go,” he complained. He found the backrest too low. He felt exposed. He liked the firm seat for his hips though. He noted the boucle fabric was trendy. It felt textured and interesting.
Ethan lay flat on the bench seat. He loved it. “It’s wide and flat,” he said. He napped for forty minutes. He woke up feeling rested. He noted there are no cracks to fall into. He liked the clean lines.
Dr. Walker commented on the ergonomics. He stated this is a "waiting room" style. He advised against it for primary TV watching. He noted the lack of neck support. I found the heavy visual weight grounded the room. It looked expensive.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Striking modern minimalist look | Very low backrest |
| Excellent surface for napping | Knees sit high for tall people |
| Durable, tight upholstery | Not comfortable for long movies |
| Wide, flat armrests | Heavy and hard to move |
Details
-
Price: $$
-
Dimensions: 90" W x 38" D x 27" H
-
Seat Depth: 25 inches
-
Seat Height: 16.5 inches
-
Upholstery: Boucle or Velvet
-
Frame: Hardwood
-
Cushion: High Density Foam
-
Legs: Recessed
-
Warranty: 3-Year Limited
-
Shipping: Large freight item
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Comfort | 4.0 | Great for lying down, bad for sitting. |
| Support | 3.5 | Minimal back support provided. |
| Durability | 4.8 | Feels like a solid block. |
| Aesthetics | 4.9 | A sculptural design piece. |
| Value | 4.3 | Form over function here. |
| Overall | 4.4 | For the design-conscious minimalist. |
Hugh 86" Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
I recognized the classic influences in the Hugh immediately. The button tufting is extensive. I sat on the cushions. They are separate from the frame. I felt them slide slightly forward. I had to push them back. The tufting on the backrest is firm. I felt the buttons against my shirt. It wasn't painful, but noticeable.
Mia liked the vintage vibe. She ran her hands over the buttons. “The detailing is beautiful,” she said. She sat upright. The back angle is steeper than the Nordic. She felt more alert. She liked this for conversation. She noted the fabric felt durable.
Marcus tested the armrests. They are high and narrow. He leaned his weight on them. They held firm. He tried to lie down. The buttons on the seat cushion poked his hip. “I would need a blanket to sleep here,” he noted. He found the seat depth comfortable for his size.
Dr. Walker pointed out the lumbar support. He noted the vertical back offers decent spinal alignment. He liked the firmer foam. He suggested it for a home office. I noticed the legs are taller. It was easy to vacuum underneath.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Beautiful mid-century detailing | Seat cushions can slide forward |
| Supportive upright seating angle | Buttons can be felt when lying down |
| High leg clearance for cleaning | Fabric is slightly coarse |
| Firm cushions resist sagging | Armrests are narrow |
Details
-
Price: $$
-
Dimensions: 86" W x 35" D x 32" H
-
Seat Depth: 22 inches
-
Seat Height: 18 inches
-
Upholstery: Polyester Blend
-
Frame: Kiln-Dried Wood
-
Cushion: Medium-Firm Foam
-
Legs: Stained Wood
-
Warranty: 3-Year Limited
-
Shipping: Standard delivery
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Comfort | 4.3 | Good for sitting, okay for napping. |
| Support | 4.5 | Good vertical support. |
| Durability | 4.6 | Tufting holds fabric tight. |
| Aesthetics | 4.8 | Classic retro appeal. |
| Value | 4.5 | Good price for the detail work. |
| Overall | 4.5 | The stylish office companion. |
Woodrow Box 87" Leather Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
I was impressed by the exposed wood frame on the Woodrow. It looks like a cage of walnut. I sat on the leather. It felt cool and smooth. This is aniline leather. It shows natural markings. The seat is very firm. It felt like a bench with a pad. I sat up very straight. My posture was perfect. I felt executive.
Carlos loved this sofa. “This is serious furniture,” he said. He typed on his laptop. The high arms supported his elbows perfectly. He liked the smell of the leather. He noted it felt premium. He did not sink at all.
Jenna found it too rigid. She tried to curl up. The wooden bars on the side pressed into her back. “You can’t lean against the armrest,” she warned. She had to use a pillow. She found the leather slippery. She slid forward slightly when she relaxed.
Dr. Walker praised the suspension. He explained that the firm base prevents pelvic tilt. He recommended this for people with disc issues. He noted the lack of cushioning on the frame itself. I admired the joinery. It felt incredibly solid.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Beautiful exposed wood frame | Very firm, almost rigid sit |
| Premium leather ages well | Wood sides are hard to lean on |
| Excellent ergonomic support | Leather requires maintenance |
| Timeless architectural design | Slippery seating surface |
Details
-
Price: $$$
-
Dimensions: 87" W x 32" D x 28" H
-
Seat Depth: 21 inches
-
Seat Height: 17.5 inches
-
Upholstery: Full Aniline Leather
-
Frame: American Walnut
-
Cushion: High Density Foam
-
Legs: Integrated Base
-
Warranty: 3-Year Limited
-
Shipping: White Glove recommended
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Comfort | 4.0 | A specific type of firm comfort. |
| Support | 4.9 | Outstanding structural support. |
| Durability | 4.8 | Leather and wood are long-lasting. |
| Aesthetics | 5.0 | A museum-worthy piece. |
| Value | 4.6 | Expensive but worth the materials. |
| Overall | 4.6 | The executive statement piece. |
Jackie 77" Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
I moved to the smaller Jackie sofa. It is cute and compact. I sat down. The seat felt shallower. My knees extended well past the edge. I felt supported but large for the frame. The fabric is a colorful weave. It felt cheery. The back is tufted and tight. I leaned back. It was firm.
Mia fit perfectly. “This was made for me,” she claimed. Her feet touched the floor. She liked the narrow depth. She didn't feel swallowed. She curled up in the corner. The armrest is low. She rested her head on it.
Jamal tried to sit. He looked oversized. “I feel like I’m sitting on a bench,” he laughed. His legs stuck out far. He found the back too low for his shoulders. He noted the frame felt light. He could shift the sofa when he sat down aggressively.
Dr. Walker noted the seat height is good for standing. He suggested this for smaller reception areas or apartments. He liked the firm resistance of the cushions. I found the retro style charming. It fit easily through our studio door.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Perfect scale for small spaces | Too small for tall people |
| charming retro aesthetic | Lightweight frame shifts easily |
| Firm, supportive seating | Shallow seat depth |
| Reasonable price point | Limited lounging capability |
Details
-
Price: $
-
Dimensions: 77" W x 32" D x 31" H
-
Seat Depth: 21 inches
-
Seat Height: 18 inches
-
Upholstery: Fabric Blend
-
Frame: Hardwood
-
Cushion: Medium Foam
-
Legs: Tapered Wood
-
Warranty: 3-Year Limited
-
Shipping: Standard box
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
| Comfort | 4.2 | Good for sitting, tight for napping. |
| Support | 4.4 | Good upright posture support. |
| Durability | 4.2 | Fabric feels decent, frame is light. |
| Aesthetics | 4.5 | Adorable retro vibe. |
| Value | 4.4 | Great for tight budgets and rooms. |
| Overall | 4.3 | The apartment dweller's friend. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling | Durability | Ease of Movement |
| Nordic | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Woodstock | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.5 | 4.5 | 3.8 |
| Newport | 4.7 | 4.9 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| Domino | 4.4 | 4.0 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 3.5 |
| Hugh | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Woodrow Box | 4.6 | 4.0 | 4.9 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 4.8 | 4.0 |
| Jackie | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.5 |
The Newport reigns supreme for pure comfort due to its depth and softness. The Nordic and Woodrow Box tie for durability and support, reflecting their solid construction. The Woodstock scores lower on cooling due to the velvet. The Jackie scores high on ease of movement due to its lighter weight. The Domino struggles with back support due to its low profile.
Best Picks
-
Best Overall Kardiel Sofa: Nordic 82" Sofa. We chose the Nordic because it perfectly balances the iconic mid-century aesthetic with a durable frame and supportive comfort that fits most users.
-
Best for Lounging: Newport Modular Sectional. This award goes to the Newport for its expansive, deep seating and modular flexibility that allows for ultimate relaxation.
-
Best Design Statement: Woodrow Box Leather Sofa. We selected the Woodrow for its stunning exposed wood frame and premium leather, making it a true centerpiece for any room.
How to Choose the Kardiel Sofa?
You must assess your tolerance for firmness. Kardiel sofas are historically firm. If you want a soft, sinking feeling, you must buy the Newport. If you prefer upright support, the Nordic or Woodrow are better choices.
Consider your room size. The Newport is a beast. It dominates a room. The Jackie is tiny. It disappears in a large loft. Measure your space carefully.
Think about your lifestyle. If you have pets, the tight weave of the Nordic is safer than the loop of a boucle Domino. If you eat on the couch, avoid the velvet Woodstock; it is harder to clean.
Check your height. If you are tall like Jamal, the low backs of the Domino and Newport will annoy you. You need the height of the Hugh or Nordic. If you are petite, the Jackie is a safe bet.
Limitations
The main limitation of the Kardiel line is the seat firmness. Most models use high-density foam. They do not have the "cloud" feel many modern buyers expect. This shocks some customers.
The seat heights are generally low. This is part of the mid-century style. It makes standing up harder for elderly users or those with knee issues.
The backrests are often low. They rarely offer head support. You cannot lean your head back to watch TV on the Nordic or Domino without a pillow.
The fabrics are premium but specific. Velvet requires care. Boucle catches crumbs. Aniline leather scratches easily. You must be prepared for maintenance.
Is the Kardiel Sofa worth it?
The Kardiel sofa is absolutely worth it for design lovers. You get a piece that looks like it cost three times the price. The materials are authentic. The woods are solid. The leathers are real.
They offer excellent value compared to true vintage pieces. You get the look without the musty smell or repair costs.
However, if you prioritize pure, mushy comfort over style, you might be disappointed. These are sitting machines, not just sleeping pads. For the right buyer, they are a fantastic investment in style and longevity.
FAQs
1. Are Kardiel sofas comfortable?
Yes, but they lean towards firm support. They are designed for posture and conversation rather than deep sinking.
2. Is the leather real?
Yes, Kardiel uses top-grain and full-aniline leathers on models like the Woodrow. It is high quality and ages naturally.
3. Do the cushions detach?
It depends on the model. The Nordic and Hugh have detachable cushions. The Woodstock and Domino have tight, fixed seats.
4. Is the fabric pet-friendly?
The tight weaves on the Nordic are durable. Velvet on the Woodstock releases hair easily but can stain. Boucle should be avoided with cats.
5. How hard is assembly?
Most models only require screwing in the legs. The Newport requires connecting the modules with clips.
6. Do they offer a warranty?
Yes, Kardiel typically offers a 3-year limited warranty on the frame and structural elements.
7. Can I flip the cushions?
On models like the Nordic, the seat cushions are often reversible, which helps extend their lifespan.
8. Is the wood solid?
Yes, frames like the Woodrow and Nordic feature exposed solid wood, usually American Walnut or Ash.
9. How low are these sofas?
They are lower than traditional furniture. Seat heights average 16-18 inches, which enhances the lounge aesthetic.
10. Do they ship quickly?
Kardiel usually has stock ready to ship. Freight delivery can take 2-3 weeks depending on your location.