Macy’s sofa lineup covers a wide range: compact fabric sofas, lounge-first sectionals, plush everyday seating, and leather power recliners.
For this review, we focused on four popular Macy’s models and used them the way most people actually use a sofa: long TV nights, laptop sessions, short naps, and guests coming over. Across the group, the strongest points were comfort and value. The trade-offs were more practical: some upholstery held heat, larger builds were hard to move, and powered seating required more planning and maintenance.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Main Strengths | Trade-Offs | Best For | Approx. Test Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radley 5-Piece Fabric Chaise Sectional | 4.0 | Large lounge footprint; reversible cushions | Needs a large room; fabric upkeep | Families, movie marathons, frequent hosting | $2,679 |
| Jollene 78" Fabric Sofa | 4.1 | Balanced depth; easy daily comfort | Needs cushion fluffing; cautious spot cleaning | Apartments, daily lounging, mixed-height households | $879 |
| Myriem 87" Fabric Sofa | 4.1 | Plush but stable sit; wipe-clean care | Attached cushions limit rotation | Casual living rooms, TV, laptop routines | $799 |
| Nevio 82" Leather Power Reclining Sofa | 3.8 | Power recline comfort; easy leather wipe-down | Heavy; more moving parts to maintain | Dedicated TV seating, recline-first households | $2,249 |
Testing Team Takeaways
The main difference was posture support during long sessions. Radley gave us the most room to spread out, but it needed space and regular fabric care. Jollene was the easiest daily driver because its 21-inch seat depth worked for more body types. Myriem felt plush and low-fuss, though the attached cushions remove the option to rotate high-use spots. Nevio delivered the strongest TV-night comfort, but it was the least casual to move and had the most hardware to maintain.
Macy's Sofa Comparison Chart
| Item | Radley 5-Piece Sectional | Jollene 78" Sofa | Myriem 87" Sofa | Nevio 82" Reclining Sofa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 148"W x 113"D x 30"H | 78"W x 38"D x 33"H | 87"W x 37"D x 37"H | 82"W x 40"D x 32"H |
| Seat depth | 24" | 21" | 22" | Not listed |
| Seat height | 18" | 18" | 20" | 20" |
| Configuration | 5-piece chaise sectional; left/right options | Standalone sofa; matching pieces available | Standalone sofa; matching pieces available | Two-piece build; dual power recliners |
| Upholstery | 100% polyester | Polyester/nylon blend | 100% polyester | 100% leather |
| Cushions | High-resiliency foam + polyester wrap; reversible | 2.0 density foam seat; fiber/down/feather back | 2.0 density foam + Dacron wrap; spring support | Plush cushions; articulating headrests; power recline |
| Firmness feel | Medium-plush, lounge-first | Medium seat with a softer back | Plush-medium with a cushioned top feel | Medium-plush with recline support |
| Back support | Good, better with a lumbar pillow | Comfortable but soft for upright work | Relaxed support for casual posture | Supportive in recline; upright depends on headrest angle |
| Breathability | Warmest in long sessions | Moderate; stays fairly neutral | Moderate-warm; tight cushions hold some heat | Cool at first, less breathable over time |
| Cleaning | Water-based spot clean | Solvent-based spot clean | Wipe clean | Leather wipe-down |
| Room fit | Large rooms and group seating | Small-to-mid rooms | Mid-size rooms and simple layouts | Needs outlet access and recline clearance |
| Durability feel | Sturdy frame; fabric care matters | Solid frame; routine cushion upkeep | Stable sit; consistent attached build | More mechanical complexity |
How We Tested It
We used the same checklist from our how we test sofas guide: delivery and setup, a first-week break-in, long viewing sessions, laptop work, and short naps.
We scored Assembly, Cooling, Comfort, Durability, Layout Practicality, Cleaning, and Value on a 5-point scale. For comfort, we looked at seat feel, back support, depth fit, ease of shifting positions, and how natural it felt to stand up after sitting for a while.
Macy's Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Radley 5-Piece Fabric Chaise Sectional
Our Testing Experience

Radley immediately changed how the room was used. The 148-inch by 113-inch footprint gave everyone space without reshuffling pillows or negotiating for the chaise. In our hands-on testing, the 24-inch seat depth made lounging feel natural, especially in the corner and chaise positions. Jenna and Ethan used the chaise-to-corner run for a two-person movie night, while Marcus stretched out there during late gaming. For upright laptop work, the deep seat needed a slim lumbar pillow.
What we liked
-
Large, lounge-ready seating that does not feel crowded
-
Reversible cushions that made routine refreshes easier
-
Enough room for guests without one obvious “best seat”
Who it is best for
-
Families or frequent hosts who want a true sprawl zone
-
Taller users who benefit from a deeper seat
-
Movie-night households that prioritize lounging over upright posture
Where it falls short
-
Deep-seat posture can flatten lower-back support during laptop work
-
The scale is unforgiving in small rooms
-
Fabric care is part of ownership, not an afterthought

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Large seating capacity for everyday use and guests | Requires a large room to feel balanced |
| Deep seat supports lounging and napping | Upright work often needs a lumbar pillow |
| Reversible, removable cushions help maintenance | Fabric upkeep is more demanding than wipe-down leather |
| Clean track-arm look | Moving the pieces is not a casual one-person task |

Details
-
Approx. test price: $2,679
-
Size and configuration: 5-piece chaise sectional; approx. 148"W x 113"D x 30"H
-
Seat depth: 24"
-
Seat height: 18"
-
Arm height: 24"
-
Cushion design: seat and back cushions are reversible and removable
-
Frame and upholstery: hardwood and pine frame; 100% polyester upholstery
-
Cushion materials: 1.8 high-resiliency foam with polyester wrap
-
Cleaning: spot clean with water-based shampoo or foam upholstery cleaner
-
Assembly: sectional setup; white glove delivery eligible

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.8 | Big-piece delivery is manageable, but not quick |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.8 | Comfortable, but warmth builds in long sessions |
| Seat Comfort | 4.4 | Deep, cushioned sit for long lounging |
| Back Support | 4.1 | Good baseline support; better with a lumbar pillow |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.9 | Great for tall loungers; too deep for some shorter users |
| Durability | 3.8 | Sturdy feel, with fabric care affecting long-term appearance |
| Ease of Movement | 3.8 | Excellent once placed; effort to reposition |
| Cleaning | 3.7 | Spot cleaning is workable but not the easiest routine |
| Value | 4.4 | Strong comfort-per-dollar for the size |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | A large-room anchor for lounging and hosting |
Jollene 78" Fabric Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Jollene was the easiest sofa to use without adjusting around it. The 21-inch seat depth kept posture more natural for shorter testers, but it still had enough room for casual lounging. Mia could curl up without feeling pushed forward, and Carlos used it for laptop work with only small posture adjustments. The back cushions were soft, so they needed fluffing, but the sofa reset quickly after daily use.

What we liked
-
Seat depth worked for a wider range of heights
-
Comfortable for both upright sitting and relaxed lounging
-
Compact footprint without feeling undersized
Who it is best for
-
Apartment living or smaller living rooms
-
Mixed-height households sharing one sofa
-
People who alternate between sitting upright and lounging
Where it falls short
-
Soft back cushions can feel too relaxed for long work sessions
-
Needs routine fluffing to stay neat
-
Solvent-based cleaning guidance is less forgiving for spills

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Balanced depth for sitting and lounging | Softer back cushions reduce upright support over time |
| Compact size fits smaller rooms | Needs cushion maintenance to stay crisp |
| Removable and reversible back cushions | Cleaning is more cautious than wipe-down care |
| Strong value for the test price | Not the best pick for deep-sprawl lounging |

Details
-
Approx. test price: $879
-
Overall dimensions: 78"W x 38"D x 33"H
-
Seat depth: 21"
-
Seat height: 18"
-
Seat length between arms: 71"
-
Frame and upholstery: solid wood framing with marine-grade laminate substrate; polyester/nylon upholstery
-
Cushion materials: fiber/down/feather back cushion; 2.0 density foam seat core with muslin encasement
-
Cushion features: back cushions are removable and reversible
-
Legs: removable
-
Cleaning: spot clean with a water-free dry-cleaning solvent
-
Delivery/setup: white glove delivery eligible

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.2 | Straightforward setup profile with removable legs |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0 | Stayed fairly neutral during long sits |
| Seat Comfort | 4.3 | Plush enough for lounging without feeling unstable |
| Back Support | 3.9 | Comfortable, but softer back needs posture awareness |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.2 | Better all-heights fit than deeper loungers |
| Durability | 4.0 | Solid build feel; cushion upkeep is the ongoing task |
| Ease of Movement | 4.2 | Manageable size for rearranging and room resets |
| Cleaning | 3.7 | Care instructions are cautious for spills |
| Value | 4.6 | Excellent price-to-comfort ratio |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | The easiest everyday sofa in this group |
Myriem 87" Fabric Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Myriem felt plush without becoming hard to stand up from. The 20-inch seat height helped Jamal rise more easily after stretching out, while Mia liked the rounded profile when she curled into a corner for reading. The attached cushions kept the surface looking consistent, and the wipe-clean care was useful during everyday testing. The drawback is control: when one spot becomes the favorite seat, you cannot rotate cushions to spread wear.

What we liked
-
Plush comfort that still felt stable when shifting positions
-
Higher seat height made standing up easier
-
Wipe-clean care simplified small messes
Who it is best for
-
Casual living rooms where the sofa is used throughout the day
-
Users who prefer a slightly higher sit
-
Households that want simple upkeep without constant cushion flipping
Where it falls short
-
Attached cushions limit rotation and adjustment
-
Breathability was only average in long sessions
-
The rounded, modern profile will not suit every room

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Plush seating with stable spring support | Attached cushions reduce adjustability |
| Higher seat height improves ease of standing | Not the coolest option for warm rooms |
| Wipe-clean care helps daily maintenance | Modern rounded style is not universally neutral |
| Consistent surface looks neat after use | Less flexible than a sectional |

Details
-
Approx. test price: $799
-
Overall dimensions: 87"W x 37"D x 37"H
-
Seat dimensions: 22" depth; 20" seat height; 25" arm height; 69" seat length between arms
-
Cushion features: attached cushions; spring seat support
-
Frame and upholstery: plywood frame; 100% polyester upholstery
-
Cushion materials: 2.0 density foam with Dacron wrap
-
Assembly: minimal assembly required; attached legs
-
Cleaning: wipe clean

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.3 | Minimal setup and a stable build |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.9 | Comfortable, but not the most breathable |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Plush feel that stayed supportive |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Relaxed support for casual postures |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | Middle-ground depth for most adults |
| Durability | 4.1 | Spring support and steady structure felt reassuring |
| Ease of Movement | 4.0 | Easier than a sectional, still substantial at 87 inches |
| Cleaning | 4.0 | Wipe-clean practicality stood out |
| Value | 4.5 | Strong comfort and simplicity at a lower entry price |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Plush, modern, and easy to maintain day to day |
Nevio 82" 2pc Leather Sofa with 2 Power Recliners
Our Testing Experience

Nevio was the most specialized sofa in the test. Once plugged in, it made the room feel more like a planned TV area than a casual living room. Marcus and Carlos used it through sports, gaming, and a late-night doze, and the power recline made it easy to take pressure off the lower back and legs. The leather was simple to wipe down, but the sofa needed clearance, outlet access, and more effort when cleaning behind it. Comfort was strong; flexibility was limited.

What we liked
-
Power recline eased long viewing sessions
-
Leather surface wiped down quickly after normal use
-
Fully reclined length supported real leg extension
Who it is best for
-
Households that prioritize recline-first comfort
-
People who watch a lot of TV and want repeatable positioning
-
Users who prefer leather feel and quick surface cleaning
Where it falls short
-
Power parts and mechanisms raise the maintenance bar
-
Heavy build makes rearranging and cleaning behind it harder
-
Upright comfort depends on headrest and recline angle

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Dual power recliners allow precise lounging angles | Heavy build makes room changes harder |
| Reclined length supports full-leg relaxation | Requires wall clearance and outlet planning |
| Leather wipe-down is convenient for daily mess | Mechanical complexity increases long-term upkeep needs |
| Track-arm silhouette fits modern rooms | Not a natural fit for tight spaces |

Details
-
Approx. test price: $2,249
-
Overall dimensions: 82"W x 40"D x 32"H
-
Reclined length: 63"
-
Minimum distance from wall to recline: 4"
-
Seat height: 20"
-
Arm height: 25.6"
-
Upholstery: 100% leather
-
Recline system: Leggett and Platt “300 EZ” mechanism; metal truss plates in seat framing
-
Assembly: power reclining build; white glove delivery eligible
-
Cleaning: leather wipe-down routine

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.8 | Manageable with delivery help, but not simple |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.8 | Comfortable at first, with limited breathability over time |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Recline positioning boosted long-session comfort |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Strong when reclined; upright depends on setup |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | Works well in recline use; less clear for strict upright sitting |
| Durability | 3.3 | More mechanisms mean more potential failure points |
| Ease of Movement | 3.4 | Heavy and layout-dependent once placed |
| Cleaning | 4.2 | Wipe-clean practicality is a real advantage |
| Value | 3.6 | Worth it for dedicated TV comfort; less universal for general use |
| Overall Score | 3.8 | A recline-first sofa that rewards a planned layout |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Depth Fit | Cooling | Durability | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radley 5-Piece Fabric Chaise Sectional | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 3.8 |
| Jollene 78" Fabric Sofa | 4.1 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.2 |
| Myriem 87" Fabric Sofa | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.0 |
| Nevio 82" Leather Power Reclining Sofa | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 3.4 |
Jollene and Myriem were the most even performers. Both gave strong comfort without major layout penalties. Radley had the biggest lounge payoff, but it demanded space and more fabric-care discipline. Nevio’s comfort score was competitive, but durability risk and movement difficulty made it a more specialized choice.
How to Choose the Macy's Sofa?
Start with seat depth and your default posture. If you sit upright with a laptop, a moderate depth usually keeps your hips and lower back in a cleaner position. If you sprawl, deeper seats feel more forgiving.
Next, measure a sofa against your room, doorways, and walking paths. Large sectionals reward open space; compact sofas keep traffic flow easier. Finally, be honest about upholstery maintenance. In this set, Jollene is the easiest fit for smaller rooms and mixed-height households, Myriem is the low-fuss plush option, Radley is the hosting and sprawl anchor, and Nevio is the recline-first TV pick.
Limitations
These Macy’s picks lean toward comfort and visual presence, so the trade-offs show up in breathability, posture precision, and long-term ease of ownership. Radley is not forgiving in small rooms. Jollene can feel too soft in the back for strict upright work. Myriem’s attached cushions reduce adjustability and rotation. Nevio needs clearance, power access, and comfort with a more complex mechanism.
Macy's Sofa Vs. Alternatives
-
Why choose these models
-
Strong comfort-per-dollar on mainstream builds
-
A clear range of formats: sectional sprawl, compact sofa, plush daily driver, and power recliner
-
Published dimensions and care guidance make planning easier
-
-
Alternatives to consider
-
Crate & Barrel Lounge Deep: consider it if you want extra-deep, low seating for curling up
-
IKEA KIVIK: consider it if you want modular flexibility and a standardized system approach
-
West Elm Harmony: consider it if you want a deep-seat sectional or sofa with plush cushions
-
Pro Tips for Macy's Sofa
-
Measure more than wall length; map walking paths so the room does not become all sofa.
-
If you are between sizes, prioritize seat-depth fit over arm style because comfort shows up daily.
-
For deep seats, keep a slim lumbar pillow nearby to reduce low-back flattening.
-
Rotate where you sit when possible; small habit changes slow down favorite spot wear.
-
Vacuum seams and cushion edges weekly so grit does not grind into fabric or stitching.
-
Treat spills as time-sensitive: blot first, then follow the listed care method.
-
For power recliners, plan outlet access and recline clearance before delivery.
-
Use felt pads or furniture glides early to protect floors.
-
If you host often, check whether guests can sit upright without sinking into a lounge slump.
-
Recheck doorways and stair turns before delivery day; large sectionals are logistics first.
FAQs
Which of these feels best for long movie nights?
Radley is the sprawl winner. Nevio is better if you want power recline and repeatable positioning.
Which option works best for smaller living rooms?
Jollene is the easiest fit at 78 inches wide, and it still feels like a full-size sofa rather than a compromise.
Which is easiest to keep clean day to day?
Myriem is the simplest for quick wipe-down maintenance. Nevio’s leather surface is also easier for fast surface cleanup than textured fabric.
Do deep seats automatically mean better comfort?
No. Deep seats help lounging, but moderate depth is often better for upright work because it keeps the hips and lower back less slouched.