Eclipse Mattress focuses on cooling-forward hybrids with zoned support and multiple firmness options, ranging from a premium adjustable-base hybrid to cooler coil-and-foam builds.
In our testing, the consistent strengths were temperature control, sturdy edges, and steadier midsection support. The main downsides were premium pricing at the top end and comfort feels that can be polarizing if you’re sensitive to bounce or prefer a deeper, slow-moving ‘hug.’
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eclipse Curve Hybrid Mattress | 4.6 | Strong support; fast response; sturdy edge | High price; less slow, sink-in hug | Combination sleepers; couples; adjustable-base users | From $3,899 |
| Eclipse Ice I-Class Mattress | 4.4 | Cool-to-touch surface; strong pressure relief | Slower to turn than latex | Hot sleepers; back sleepers; sensitive shoulders/hips | From $1,799 |
| Eclipse Ice E-Class Mattress | 4.5 | Very responsive; strong cooling; durable build feel | Bouncier than some couples prefer | Hot sleepers; combination sleepers; people who hate feeling “stuck” | From $2,399 |
| Eclipse YourCOMFORT Chill Mattress | 4.4 | Five firmness options; balanced support; stable edge | Less springy than latex; feel varies by firmness | Mixed-position sleepers; couples split on firmness | From $1,659 |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across these four models, the Curve Hybrid felt the most tuned for adjustable bases and quick movement, while the Ice I-Class delivered the most classic cooling-plus-memory-foam pressure relief. The Ice E-Class was bouncier and more elastic, and the YourCOMFORT Chill made it easiest to dial in firmness without giving up edge stability. For hot sleepers, the Ice line stayed the most consistently comfortable over long nights.
Eclipse Mattress Comparison Chart
| Feature | Eclipse Curve Hybrid Mattress | Eclipse Ice I-Class Mattress | Eclipse Ice E-Class Mattress | Eclipse YourCOMFORT Chill Mattress |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hybrid | Cooling hybrid | Cooling hybrid with latex + micro-coils | Cooling hybrid with zoned lumbar support |
| Firmness options | Five firmness options | Firm / Plush / Pillow Top | Plush / Firm / Pillow Top | Five firmness options |
| Cooling approach | PCM cover + gel-infused foam | GlacierTech cooling cover + copper foam | GlacierTech cooling cover + latex + coils airflow | EclipseCHILL cooling fibers + cooling gel lumbar zone |
| Notable materials | COOLGel foam; ERF comfort foam; pocketed coils; curveCORE | Copper Visco foam; transition foam; pocketed coils | Organic latex; micro-coils; pocketed coils | Lumbar Zone support; micro-coils; pocketed coils |
| Support features | Spinal Zone + curveCORE + foam-encased coils | Spinal Zone + foam-encased pocketed coils | Spinal Zone + foam-encased pocketed coils | Spinal Zone + targeted lumbar zone support |
| Edge support feel | Very stable for sitting; minimal edge drift | Stable, especially in firm | Stable, with a bit more spring | Stable and predictable across feels |
| Motion isolation | Good for a hybrid | Very good (foam-forward top) | Good, but more bounce than I-Class | Good, varies by firmness |
| Best fit in testing | Couples, adjustable bases, frequent turning | Hot sleepers who want pressure relief | Cooling plus fast response | Households split on firmness |
| Starting price | $3,899 | $1,799 | $2,399 | $1,659 |
| Warranty | 15 years | 15 years | 15 years | 10 years |
| Sizes | Twin to King/Cal King | Twin to Split Head King | Twin to Split Head King | Twin to King |
How We Tested It
We tested each mattress on the same foundation using our how we test mattresses checklist, rotating placement and logging nightly notes. We used one checklist for support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability. Jenna and Ethan repeated partner-movement drills, while Marcus ran heat and edge stress tests (sitting, tying shoes, and “half-on/half-off” lounging). I tracked alignment and lower-back feel after long desk days, then rechecked the same positions after a short break-in period.
Eclipse Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Eclipse Curve Hybrid Mattress

Our Testing Experience
The response was immediate. Rolling from my back to my side felt quick and controlled—there wasn’t that “sink, then climb out” moment you get with slower foams.
On an adjustable base, the bend stayed smooth and supportive, and the center third held up when I sat to put on socks. Marcus pushed it with warm-room testing and heavier bedding, and it still ran cooler than most hybrids we’ve had in rotation. During partner-movement drills, Jenna and Ethan found it more composed than they expected for a springier build, especially in a medium-firm setting.
What we liked
-
Fast, effortless turning with a supported, buoyant feel
-
A cooler-to-the-touch top that held up over long nights
-
Strong edges for sitting and minimal edge drift
Who it is best for
-
Combination sleepers who change positions often
-
Couples who want stability without a dead surface
-
Adjustable-base users who want a mattress that follows the frame
Where it falls short
-
Premium pricing can be hard to justify for budget shoppers
-
Not the best match if you want a deep, slow memory-foam hug
-
Softer settings can feel too plush for strict stomach sleepers

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very responsive for combo sleepers | Expensive relative to the rest of the line |
| Stable edge support | Less “melting” contour than memory foam |
| Cooling-focused cover and foam | Softer options may not suit stomach sleepers |

Details
-
Price: from $3,899
-
Firmness: Softest, Medium/Soft, Medium, Medium Firm, Firmest
-
Sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King/Cal King
-
Type/materials: PCM cooling cover; gel-infused foam; ERF comfort foam; transition foam; foam-encased wrapped coils; curveCORE
-
Cooling: PCM cover + COOLGel foam
-
Edge support: LifEdge + foam-encased coil perimeter
-
Certifications/notes: Chiropractor Seal; OEKO-TEX Standard 100; CertiPUR-US; made in the USA
-
Warranty: 15 years
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4.6 | Strongest all-around performer for movement + support |
| Support | 4.7 | Holds hips level and stays composed through the center zone |
| Pressure Relief | 4.4 | Cushions well without letting my hips sink too deep |
| Cooling | 4.5 | Stays cooler under heavier bedding and warm rooms |
| Motion Isolation | 4.4 | Noticeably calmer than many hybrids once settled in |
| Responsiveness | 4.6 | Fast recovery; easy roll and repositioning |
| Edge Support | 4.6 | Stable for sitting and edge drift |
| Durability | 4.7 | Robust build feel with a longer warranty |
Eclipse Ice I-Class Mattress

Our Testing Experience
It felt cool as soon as I lay down—more like a cool sheet than a fleeting “cold spot.” I appreciated it most on nights when my lower back felt tight: the midsection stayed steady, while the top gave my shoulders more pressure relief when I started on my side.
Marcus, who tends to overheat quickly, said the surface stayed comfortable longer than he expected. In partner-movement drills, Jenna and Ethan also noted less bounce during entry and exit than you get on latex-forward mattresses.
What we liked
-
Cool-to-touch surface feel that stayed noticeable overnight
-
Cushioned pressure relief without losing midline support
-
Lower motion disturbance during partner movement drills
Who it is best for
-
Hot sleepers who still want a more traditional, cushioned top
-
Back sleepers needing stable midsection support
-
Couples who prioritize quieter movement
Where it falls short
-
Turning has more “memory foam drag” than latex or springy hybrids
-
Plush feel can feel too yielding for strict stomach sleepers

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Cooling cover stays cool-to-touch | Slower turning compared with latex |
| Strong pressure relief at shoulders/hips | Plush options may not suit stomach sleepers |
| Good motion control | Less “bounce” for people who want spring |

Details
-
Price: from $1,799
-
Firmness: Firm, Plush, Pillow Top
-
Sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, Cal King, Split Head Queen, Split Head King
-
Type/materials: GlacierTech cooling cover; Copper Visco foam; transition foam; Spinal Zone support; foam-encased wrapped pocketed coils
-
Cooling: GlacierTech cooling cover + copper foam
-
Edge support: foam-encased wrapped pocketed coils
-
Certifications/notes: Chiropractor Seal; CertiPUR-US; made in the USA
-
Warranty: 15 years
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4.4 | Best “cool + cushioned” balance in the group |
| Support | 4.4 | Keeps my lumbar zone stable without feeling rigid |
| Pressure Relief | 4.5 | Most forgiving on shoulders/hips for longer side starts |
| Cooling | 4.6 | Cool-to-touch feel stays noticeable through the night |
| Motion Isolation | 4.4 | Partner movement stays muted |
| Responsiveness | 4.1 | Some drag when turning compared with latex |
| Edge Support | 4.3 | Solid edge structure for sitting and entry/exit |
| Durability | 4.4 | Strong build feel with a longer warranty |
Eclipse Ice E-Class Mattress

Our Testing Experience
This was the quickest “snap back” option in the lineup. I could stretch, roll, and settle without feeling pinned, and it stayed cooler even when I used a thicker comforter.
The latex-and-micro-coil build has more spring. Jenna and Ethan felt more movement than on the I-Class, but it never turned chaotic. Where it really shined was how quickly it reset—after I got up for water, the surface felt even again almost immediately.
What we liked
-
Very quick response with less of a “stuck” sensation
-
Strong cooling performance in warm conditions
-
Stable edge with a lively, supported top
Who it is best for
-
Hot sleepers who also want bounce and fast recovery
-
Combination sleepers who hate slow foam
-
People who prefer a more elastic, lifted feel
Where it falls short
-
More bounce than the I-Class for light sleepers sharing a bed
-
Less “deep hug” than memory-foam-forward builds

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very responsive, easy turning | More bounce than foam-forward options |
| Strong cooling and airflow feel | Less “deep hug” contour |
| Stable edge construction | Some couples may prefer quieter motion |

Details
-
Price: from $2,399
-
Firmness: Plush, Firm, Pillow Top
-
Sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, Cal King, Split Head Queen, Split Head King
-
Type/materials: GlacierTech cooling cover; GOLS certified organic latex; responsive micro-coils; transition foam; Spinal Zone support; foam-encased wrapped pocketed coils
-
Cooling: GlacierTech cooling cover + latex/coil airflow
-
Edge support: foam-encased wrapped pocketed coils
-
Certifications/notes: Chiropractor Seal; CertiPUR-US; made in the USA
-
Warranty: 15 years
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4.5 | Cooling + fast response, with minor motion trade-offs |
| Support | 4.6 | Keeps hips up with a more elastic pushback |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3 | Good, but not as “sink-in” as foam-heavy builds |
| Cooling | 4.7 | Best long-night cooling feel in our rotation |
| Motion Isolation | 4.2 | Slightly more movement than I-Class |
| Responsiveness | 4.7 | Quick recovery; very easy repositioning |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | Strong perimeter with usable sleep surface |
| Durability | 4.7 | Latex-forward build that feels built to last |
Eclipse YourCOMFORT Chill Mattress

Our Testing Experience
This was the most “pick your feel” option. I started with a medium setting, then spent a week on a softer feel to see how much the pressure relief changed.
The surface stayed cool and dry-feeling, and the lumbar-zone support was most noticeable when I was flat on my back reading. Marcus preferred firmer for hip support, while Jenna and Ethan liked that the edge stayed dependable even when they drifted outward. It doesn’t have the same springy pop as the E-Class, but it felt balanced once the firmness matched the sleeper.
What we liked
-
Five firmness choices make it easier to match your sleep style
-
Noticeable lumbar-zone stability for back sleeping
-
Stable edge support across different feels
Who it is best for
-
Mixed-position sleepers and households split on firmness
-
People who want cooling without an overly bouncy surface
-
Couples who need predictable edge use
Where it falls short
-
Less lively than the latex-forward E-Class
-
Comfort varies a lot by firmness, so the “right pick” matters

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Multiple firmness options | Feel varies significantly by firmness choice |
| Cooling cover and lumbar zoning | Less bounce than latex-forward builds |
| Stable edges and balanced support | Not the deepest “hug” for contour chasers |

Details
-
Price: from $1,659
-
Firmness: Firmest, Medium firm, Medium, Soft, Softest
-
Sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King
-
Type/materials: EclipseCHILL instant-cooling cover; Lumbar Zone support; transition foam; foam-encased wrapped pocketed coils; micro-coils; copper-infused memory foam is referenced in the comfort description
-
Cooling: EclipseCHILL rapid cooling fibers designed to wick heat and moisture
-
Edge support: foam-encased wrapped pocketed coils
-
Certifications/notes: Chiropractor Seal; CertiPUR-US; made in the USA
-
Warranty: 10 years
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4.4 | Balanced performance with standout firmness flexibility |
| Support | 4.4 | Lumbar zone helps keep my midline steady |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Good, but depends heavily on firmness choice |
| Cooling | 4.5 | Stays cool and dry-feeling through the night |
| Motion Isolation | 4.3 | Partner movement remains controlled |
| Responsiveness | 4.4 | Easier turning than foam-heavy builds, less pop than latex |
| Edge Support | 4.4 | Stable perimeter for shared sleep surface |
| Durability | 4.3 | Solid build feel, shorter warranty than 15-year models |
Performance Score Comparison
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eclipse Curve Hybrid Mattress | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Eclipse Ice I-Class Mattress | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 |
| Eclipse Ice E-Class Mattress | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Eclipse YourCOMFORT Chill Mattress | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.4 |
The Curve Hybrid is the most even “do-everything” option, with top-tier support and easy movement. The Ice E-Class has the clearest advantage in cooling plus responsiveness, while the Ice I-Class is the best fit if you want cooling with a more cushioned, pressure-relieving top. The YourCOMFORT Chill is the most adaptable—its ceiling depends on picking the right firmness.
How Do You Choose an Eclipse Mattress?
Start with the basics of how to choose a mattress—your preferred feel and how fast you like to move on the surface. If you change positions often, the Curve Hybrid and Ice E-Class are the easiest to roll and reset. If you prefer a calmer, more cushioned top, the Ice I-Class is the safer starting point.
For hot sleepers, the Ice models were the most consistently comfortable in our rotation, with E-Class feeling the most airflow-like. If you and your partner can’t agree on firmness, the YourCOMFORT Chill makes it easiest to dial in a feel without switching models. Lighter side sleepers usually do better in the softer Chill settings or an I-Class plush, while heavier back and stomach sleepers generally need firmer options to keep hips from sinking.
Limitations
A cooling-first approach comes with predictable trade-offs. Latex and micro-coils add bounce (E-Class), while foam-forward tops can feel slower to turn on (I-Class). The Curve Hybrid tested extremely well, but the price puts it in a premium bracket that may be unnecessary for a guest room. And while the YourCOMFORT Chill’s five firmness choices are a real advantage, choosing the wrong feel can take the shine off an otherwise balanced design.
Eclipse Mattresses vs. Alternatives
Why choose these models
- Strong cooling emphasis across the lineup
- Zoned support that stays steady through the midsection
- Multiple “feel” paths: springy (E-Class), cushioned (I-Class), configurable (Chill), premium adjustable-base hybrid (Curve)
Alternatives to consider
- Saatva Classic: more traditional coil feel with strong edge support
- Tempur-Pedic Breeze line: deeper pressure relief with premium cooling options
- Avocado Green Mattress: latex-forward feel with a more natural-materials positioning
Pro Tips for Eclipse Mattresses
-
Pick firmness based on your dominant position, not your “aspirational” one.
-
Give each model a real break-in window, and use the mattress trial period before judging pressure relief.
-
If you sleep hot, use breathable sheets so the cooling cover can do its job.
-
For couples, prioritize edge support if either of you drifts outward at night.
-
If you use an adjustable base, start with a gentle incline and adjust over a week.
-
Rotate on a consistent schedule so the feel stays even across the surface.
-
For low-back tightness, test alignment on your back for 10 minutes before committing.
-
If you like bounce, favor E-Class; if you want calm, favor I-Class.
-
Use a pillow height that matches how much your shoulder sinks when you’re on your side.
FAQs
Which Eclipse mattress feels least ‘stuck’?
The Ice E-Class, thanks to its faster, springier response.
Which Eclipse mattress is best for hot sleepers?
The Ice models overall. In our rotation, E-Class ran coolest, while I-Class added more cushioned pressure relief.
Which one is easiest for couples to agree on?
YourCOMFORT Chill, since the five firmness options make it easier to match preferences without switching models.