Eclipse builds cooling-focused hybrids for several kinds of sleepers, but the four models in this review feel distinctly different. The Curve Hybrid pairs slow-contouring foam with an adjustable-base-friendly support system, the Ice I-Class offers the calmest foam feel, the Ice E-Class is the liveliest, and the YourCOMFORT Chill gives you the broadest choice of firmness.
Cooling, sturdy edges, and steady midsection support were the most consistent strengths. The trade-offs are just as clear: the Curve is expensive, the E-Class transfers more movement, and the softer foam options can make turning slower. The sections below explain which model handles each compromise best.
Table of Contents
- Which Eclipse Mattress Fits Best?
- Our Bottom Line on Each Model
- How the Four Eclipse Mattresses Differ
- What We Measured and Why
- Eclipse Mattress: Our Testing Experience
- How the Scores Compare
- Which Eclipse Mattress Should You Choose?
- Where These Mattresses Fall Short
- How Eclipse Compares With Popular Alternatives
- Getting the Best Fit From an Eclipse Mattress
- FAQs
Which Eclipse Mattress Fits Best?
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eclipse Curve Hybrid | 4.6/5 | Strong support; easy movement; sturdy edge | High price; slow-contouring top foam | Combination sleepers; couples; adjustable-base users |
| Eclipse Ice I-Class | 4.4/5 | Cool surface; strong pressure relief; low bounce | Slowest response in the group | Hot sleepers; back and side sleepers; couples |
| Eclipse Ice E-Class | 4.5/5 | Fast response; excellent cooling; durable feel | More motion transfer than I-Class | Hot sleepers; combination sleepers; latex fans |
| Eclipse YourCOMFORT Chill | 4.4/5 | Five firmness options; balanced support; stable edge | Performance changes noticeably by firmness | Mixed-position sleepers; couples with different preferences |
Our Bottom Line on Each Model
The Curve Hybrid is the strongest all-around option here. Its ERF foam does contour slowly, but the coil system and curveCORE keep position changes from becoming difficult. It makes the most sense for an adjustable base or for shoppers who value support enough to accept the premium price.
The Ice I-Class is the better choice when pressure relief and motion control matter more than speed. Its Copper Visco foam let the shoulder and hip settle without giving up the firmer support through the middle. It also felt calmer than the two more responsive hybrids.
The Ice E-Class is the clear pick for a hot sleeper who dislikes slow foam. Latex and micro-coils gave it the fastest recovery and the coolest long-session result, though partners who wake easily may notice more movement.
The YourCOMFORT Chill is the practical choice when firmness is the main decision. Its five separate comfort versions cover a wider range of sleepers than the other models, but choosing the right one matters more than it does with a single-feel mattress.
How the Four Eclipse Mattresses Differ
| Feature | Curve Hybrid | Ice I-Class | Ice E-Class | YourCOMFORT Chill |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hybrid | Foam-forward cooling hybrid | Latex, micro-coil, and pocket-coil hybrid | Cooling hybrid with lumbar zoning |
| Firmness | Five options | Firm, Plush, Pillow Top | Plush, Firm, Pillow Top | Five options |
| Cooling | PCM cover and gel foam | GlacierTech cover and copper foam | GlacierTech cover, latex, and open coil layers | EclipseCHILL cover and cooling-gel lumbar crown |
| Materials | COOLGel foam, ERF foam, pocketed coils, curveCORE | Copper Visco foam, transition foam, pocketed coils | Organic latex, micro-coils, pocketed coils | Copper-infused foam, transition foam, LifEdge pocketed coils |
| Support | Zoned support, curveCORE, foam-encased coils | Zoned support and foam-encased coils | Zoned support and foam-encased coils | Targeted lumbar gel foam and reinforced coils |
| Edge feel | Very stable for sitting | Stable, especially in Firm | Stable with more spring | Stable; softer versions compress more |
| Motion | Good for a responsive hybrid | Best in the group | Good, but noticeably bouncier | Good; varies by firmness |
| Starting price | $3,899 | $1,799 | $2,399 | $1,659 |
| Warranty | 15 years | 15 years | 15 years | 10 years |
| Sizes | Twin to King/Cal King | Twin to Split Head King | Twin to Split Head King | Twin to King |
What We Measured and Why
Each mattress spent at least 12 nights on the same rigid foundation, with its position rotated between test blocks. The same mattress testing process covered support and alignment, surface temperature, pressure relief, motion isolation, response speed, edge support, and durability.
Jenna and Ethan repeated entry, exit, and rollover drills from opposite sides of the bed. Marcus handled warm-room and edge-load checks. I recorded back, side, and stomach comfort after the break-in period, then repeated the measurements so an unusually good or bad first night did not decide the scores.
Eclipse Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Eclipse Curve Hybrid

Our Testing Experience
The Medium Firm sample felt like a 6.5 out of 10 after 14 nights. Its ERF foam eased in around the body rather than snapping back like latex, but the support unit kept rolling from back to side manageable. A 44-pound load sank 1.6 inches at the center, and the surface recovered to 90% of its original height in 1.4 seconds after the weight came off. That combination explains why the mattress can contour slowly without feeling difficult to move across.
Articulation was the standout. On an adjustable base, the mattress followed a moderate head-and-foot incline without lifting through the middle. During the 30-minute heat check, the surface rose 4.7°F and returned to within 1.8°F of its starting temperature 10 minutes after the tester got up. Under the same 200-pound load, the edge compressed 3.1 inches versus 3.8 inches at the center, so sitting to put on socks felt secure.
What we liked
-
Slow, even contour backed by a support system that still allows easy position changes
-
Smooth articulation on an adjustable base without a noticeable center gap
-
A stable edge that remains useful for sitting and sleeping
Who it is best for
-
Combination sleepers who want contour without feeling trapped
-
Couples who want a responsive hybrid with controlled motion
-
Adjustable-base users who need the mattress to follow the frame cleanly
Where it falls short
-
The $3,899 starting price is difficult to justify for a secondary bedroom
-
The ERF foam still feels slower and more enveloping than latex
-
Soft versions may let a strict stomach sleeper’s hips settle too far

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Easy repositioning for a contouring hybrid | Most expensive model in this group |
| Stable perimeter | Slower top foam than latex |
| PCM cover and gel foam manage heat well | Soft versions may not suit stomach sleepers |

Details
-
Price: from $3,899
-
Firmness: Softest, Medium/Soft, Medium, Medium Firm, Firmest
-
Sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King/Cal King
-
Materials: PCM cooling cover, COOLGel foam, slow-response ERF foam, transition foam, foam-encased wrapped coils, curveCORE
-
Cooling: PCM cover and COOLGel foam
-
Edge support: LifEdge foam-encased coil perimeter
-
Certifications/notes: chiropractic seal, OEKO-TEX Standard 100, CertiPUR-US, made in the USA
-
Warranty: 15 years

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4.6/5 | Best balance of support, movement, and edge stability |
| Support | 4.7/5 | Keeps the hips level through the center zone |
| Pressure Relief | 4.4/5 | Slow contour cushions without excessive hip sink |
| Cooling | 4.5/5 | Controls heat under heavier bedding |
| Motion Isolation | 4.4/5 | Calmer than its responsive support system suggests |
| Responsiveness | 4.6/5 | Support recovers quickly beneath the contouring foam |
| Edge Support | 4.6/5 | Secure for sitting and edge sleeping |
| Durability | 4.7/5 | Dense foams, reinforced coils, and a 15-year warranty |
Eclipse Ice I-Class

Our Testing Experience
The Plush sample settled at 5.5 out of 10 after 12 nights. A 170-pound side-and-back sleeper produced 2.6 inches of shoulder sink and 2.2 inches at the hip, enough to reduce pressure without letting the waist drop. This was the most forgiving surface for a long side-sleeping stretch, and the firmer middle stayed noticeable when we returned to the back.
The cover felt cool immediately, and the surface gained 4.1°F during the 30-minute heat test. Copper Visco foam took 2.8 seconds to recover to 90% height after load removal, the slowest result here. That slower response also helped with partner disturbance: the vibration from a standard rollover drill settled in 1.3 seconds, and entry on the opposite edge felt muted rather than springy.
What we liked
-
Strong shoulder and hip relief without losing midsection support
-
The calmest surface when a partner gets in or turns over
-
A cool-to-the-touch cover that remains comfortable through a warm session
Who it is best for
-
Hot sleepers who still want a cushioned, foam-forward top
-
Back and side sleepers who need both pressure relief and lumbar stability
-
Couples who value low bounce more than quick response
Where it falls short
-
Turning takes more effort than it does on the E-Class
-
The Plush and Pillow Top versions can be too yielding for stomach sleepers
-
People who enjoy a lively surface may find it subdued

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Cool-to-the-touch cover | Slowest turning in the group |
| Strong shoulder and hip relief | Soft versions may not suit stomach sleepers |
| Very good motion control | Limited bounce |

Details
-
Price: from $1,799
-
Firmness: Firm, Plush, Pillow Top
-
Sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, Cal King, Split Head Queen, Split Head King
-
Materials: GlacierTech cover, Copper Visco foam, transition foam, zoned support, foam-encased wrapped pocketed coils
-
Cooling: GlacierTech cover and copper foam
-
Edge support: foam-encased wrapped pocketed coils
-
Certifications/notes: chiropractic seal, CertiPUR-US, made in the USA
-
Warranty: 15 years

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4.4/5 | Best balance of cooling, cushion, and low motion |
| Support | 4.4/5 | Stable through the lumbar area without feeling rigid |
| Pressure Relief | 4.5/5 | Most forgiving at the shoulder and hip |
| Cooling | 4.6/5 | Cool cover and moderate heat buildup |
| Motion Isolation | 4.4/5 | Partner movement stays muted |
| Responsiveness | 4.1/5 | Noticeably slower than latex and micro-coils |
| Edge Support | 4.3/5 | Solid for sitting and getting out of bed |
| Durability | 4.4/5 | Dense build with a 15-year warranty |
Eclipse Ice E-Class

Our Testing Experience
The Firm sample registered 7 out of 10 after 14 nights and recovered to 90% height in 0.8 seconds, the quickest result in the group. The latex and micro-coils lifted the body as soon as weight shifted, so moving from side to back required no push from an elbow or hand. A 44-pound load sank 1.3 inches, which matched the more on-top-of-the-bed feel.
Cooling was equally strong. The surface rose 3.6°F after 30 minutes and came back to within 1.2°F of baseline 10 minutes after the tester got up. The trade-off appeared in the partner drill: vibration lasted 2.1 seconds, compared with 1.3 seconds on the I-Class. The edge still held firm, compressing 2.9 inches under a 200-pound load and recovering almost immediately.
What we liked
-
The fastest recovery and easiest position changes in the group
-
Performance that belongs among the best cooling mattresses during a long warm-room session
-
A supportive edge that does not feel soft or delayed
Who it is best for
-
Hot sleepers who also want bounce and quick recovery
-
Combination sleepers who dislike slow memory foam
-
People who prefer the resilient pushback of latex
Where it falls short
-
Light sleepers may notice a partner’s movement more than on the I-Class
-
The Firm version gives less deep shoulder contour than a foam-heavy bed
-
Its lively feel will not suit someone who wants a quiet, slow surface

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very fast recovery | More motion transfer than I-Class |
| Excellent cooling and airflow | Less deep contour in Firm |
| Strong, responsive edge | Too lively for some couples |

Details
-
Price: from $2,399
-
Firmness: Plush, Firm, Pillow Top
-
Sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, Cal King, Split Head Queen, Split Head King
-
Materials: GlacierTech cover, GOLS-certified organic latex, responsive micro-coils, transition foam, zoned support, foam-encased wrapped pocketed coils
-
Cooling: GlacierTech cover with latex and coil airflow
-
Edge support: foam-encased wrapped pocketed coils
-
Certifications/notes: chiropractic seal, CertiPUR-US, made in the USA
-
Warranty: 15 years

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4.5/5 | Excellent cooling and response with a motion trade-off |
| Support | 4.6/5 | Elastic pushback keeps the hips lifted |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3/5 | Even support, but less sink in Firm |
| Cooling | 4.7/5 | Lowest heat rise in the group |
| Motion Isolation | 4.2/5 | More movement reaches the other side |
| Responsiveness | 4.7/5 | Fastest recovery and easiest repositioning |
| Edge Support | 4.5/5 | Strong perimeter with quick recovery |
| Durability | 4.7/5 | Latex and dual coil layers feel built for regular use |
Eclipse YourCOMFORT Chill

Our Testing Experience
We compared separate Medium and Soft samples for seven nights each. The Medium felt like a 6 out of 10 and the Soft like a 4.5. Under a 44-pound load, the Medium sank 1.7 inches and the Soft 2.2 inches. That half-inch difference was easy to feel at the hip and shoulder, so this is a model where the selected firmness changes the experience more than the shared name suggests.
Both versions kept a steady lumbar area when lying on the back. The Medium gained 4.4°F in the 30-minute heat test and recovered to 90% height in 1.6 seconds; the Soft took 2.0 seconds. Edge compression under a 200-pound load was 3.2 inches on Medium and 3.8 inches on Soft. Neither felt unstable, but couples who use the full width should consider that difference before choosing the softer build.
What we liked
-
Five distinct firmness options cover a wide range of body types and sleep positions
-
The cooling-gel lumbar crown gives the middle a steady, supported feel
-
Reinforced coils keep the perimeter useful, especially in Medium and firmer
Who it is best for
-
Shoppers who know the firmness they need but want the same cooling design
-
Back and combination sleepers who want targeted lumbar support
-
Couples who need a predictable edge and moderate motion control
Where it falls short
-
The five choices are separate versions, not an adjustable firmness system
-
The Soft version loses more edge height under load
-
It lacks the quick, buoyant response of the latex-based E-Class

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Five firmness options | The right choice requires careful matching |
| Cooling cover and lumbar gel zone | Less responsive than the E-Class |
| Stable reinforced edge | Soft versions compress more at the perimeter |

Details
-
Price: from $1,659
-
Firmness: Firmest, Medium Firm, Medium, Soft, Softest
-
Sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King
-
Materials: EclipseCHILL cover, copper-infused comfort foam, cooling-gel lumbar crown, transition foam, more than 1,000 LifEdge wrapped coils
-
Cooling: rapid-cooling cover fibers and a cooling-gel lumbar zone
-
Edge support: reinforced LifEdge wrapped coils
-
Certifications/notes: chiropractic seal, CertiPUR-US, made in the USA
-
Warranty: 10 years

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4.4/5 | Balanced performance with exceptional firmness choice |
| Support | 4.4/5 | Lumbar crown keeps the middle steady |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2/5 | Good when the firmness matches the sleeper |
| Cooling | 4.5/5 | Cool cover with controlled heat buildup |
| Motion Isolation | 4.3/5 | Partner movement remains controlled |
| Responsiveness | 4.4/5 | Moderate recovery that slows in softer versions |
| Edge Support | 4.4/5 | Strong in Medium and firmer; softer builds compress more |
| Durability | 4.3/5 | Solid coil system with a shorter warranty than the other models |
How the Scores Compare
| Mattress | Overall | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eclipse Curve Hybrid | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Eclipse Ice I-Class | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 |
| Eclipse Ice E-Class | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 4.7 |
| Eclipse YourCOMFORT Chill | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.4 |
The Curve Hybrid has the most even profile, led by support and durability. The E-Class wins cooling and response, while the I-Class trades speed for better pressure relief and quieter movement. The YourCOMFORT Chill does not top a single metric, but it is the easiest to match to a preferred firmness.
Which Eclipse Mattress Should You Choose?
Start with feel, then narrow the choice by your main sleep position. If you change positions often, the E-Class is the easiest to move on; the Curve adds more contour and better adjustable-base articulation. If you want a calmer surface, the I-Class is the better starting point. The YourCOMFORT Chill works best when you already know whether you need Soft, Medium, or Firm support. Our guide to choosing a mattress explains how to weigh these factors.
For hot sleepers, the E-Class had the lowest heat rise, followed closely by the I-Class. Lighter side sleepers should look first at I-Class Plush or the softer Chill versions. Heavier back sleepers and most stomach sleepers need a firmer version to limit hip sink. Couples should decide whether motion control or easy movement matters more: I-Class favors the first, E-Class the second.
Where These Mattresses Fall Short
None of these models is an automatic fit. The E-Class sends more movement across the bed, while the I-Class can slow down a restless sleeper. The Curve’s price reaches well beyond the rest of the lineup, and its slow-response foam will not please someone looking for pure latex-like bounce. YourCOMFORT Chill solves the range problem with five firmness versions, but the softer choices give up some edge stability. Because return and comfort-exchange policies can depend on the seller, confirm those terms before ordering.
How Eclipse Compares With Popular Alternatives
Eclipse stands out for making cooling and zoned support common across several distinct feels. The Ice I-Class is the calm, foam-forward option; the Ice E-Class is the buoyant latex model; the YourCOMFORT Chill offers the widest firmness range; and the Curve places adjustable-base articulation at the top of the lineup.
Saatva Classic costs less at the entry level and has a more traditional dual-coil, Euro-top feel. Its edge is sturdy and its lumbar reinforcement is substantial, but it does not put the same emphasis on a cool-to-the-touch surface. Choose Saatva for familiar innerspring lift; choose an Eclipse Ice model when surface cooling is the priority.
The TEMPUR-ProBreeze and LuxeBreeze hybrid are the closest alternatives to the Curve’s premium price. They contour more deeply and absorb partner movement better, while Eclipse’s hybrid models make turning easier. TEMPUR-Breeze suits sleepers who want a slow, close pressure-relieving feel; the E-Class and Curve are better for sleepers who reposition often.
Avocado Green is the strongest alternative for shoppers focused on certified-organic materials. Its latex-and-coil construction feels resilient and breathable, much like the general direction of the E-Class, but its materials story is more comprehensive. Eclipse offers a more obvious cool-to-the-touch sensation and a foam-forward option that Avocado does not try to imitate.
Getting the Best Fit From an Eclipse Mattress
-
Choose firmness for the position in which you spend most of the night.
-
Confirm the seller’s return or comfort-exchange window before buying; terms can vary by retailer.
-
Use breathable sheets so the cooling cover is not buried under dense bedding.
-
Couples who use the full width should pay close attention to edge support.
-
With an adjustable base, begin with a gentle incline and add height gradually.
-
Rotate the mattress on a regular schedule unless the seller’s care instructions say otherwise.
-
For lower-back tightness, lie on your back for at least 10 minutes and check whether the hips remain level.
-
Pick the E-Class for bounce, the I-Class for calm motion, and the Curve for a mix of contour and mobility.
-
Match pillow height to shoulder sink, especially with I-Class Plush or a softer Chill version.
FAQs
Which Eclipse mattress is easiest to move on?
The Ice E-Class. Its latex and micro-coils produced the fastest recovery and required the least effort when changing positions.
Which Eclipse mattress is best for hot sleepers?
The Ice E-Class had the lowest heat rise in our 30-minute check. The I-Class is the better alternative if you want strong cooling with deeper foam contour and less bounce.
Which model is easiest for couples to agree on?
The YourCOMFORT Chill offers five firmness versions, so it covers the widest range of preferences. If one partner wakes easily from movement, the Ice I-Class may still be the safer choice.