Your cart

Your cart is empty

We receive free products to review and participate in affiliate programs, where we are compensated for items purchased through links from our site. See our disclosure page for more information.

E&S Mattress Reviews (2026)

E&S Mattress is best known for value-driven, no-nonsense comfort built around traditional innerspring support, with a lineup that tends to favor straightforward builds over flashy add-ons. In this review, I focused on four current models that reflect that practical approach—testing support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability to clarify who each mattress fits, and who should skip them.

Product Overview

Mattress Overall Score Pros Cons Ideal For
Catskill 3.5 Cushioning surface; simple support; easy value pick Light edge stability; limited motion control Kids, guest rooms, budget shoppers
Cobble Hill 3.4 Low profile feel; straightforward spring support Thinner comfort; can feel “basic” Dorms, first apartments, tight budgets
Harlow 4.0 Strong support balance; better cooling feel; steadier edges Still spring-forward on partner movement Combination sleepers, hot sleepers who want bounce
Shelton 3.9 More structured support; strong durability direction More motion transfer than foam-heavy beds Back sleepers, heavier sleepers, longevity-focused buyers

Testing Team Takeaways

Across the four, Harlow was the most “finished” feeling—supportive without feeling rigid, and the easiest to live with night after night. Catskill and Cobble Hill both delivered basic comfort at entry pricing, but we felt clearer limitations in edge steadiness and deeper pressure relief. Shelton landed as the practical durability pick: more structured support in the midsection, and the kind of build you choose when you want the mattress to stay “true” over time.

E&S Mattress Comparison Chart

Item Catskill Cobble Hill Harlow Shelton
Type Foam encased innerspring Traditional innerspring Hybrid Foam encased innerspring
Comfort options Plush, Pillow Top Plush, Firm, Euro Top Plush, Firm, Pillow Top Firm, Plush, Pillow Top, Euro Top
Coil/support system (noted) 504 Spectrum innerspring 504 Spectrum innerspring 789 Quantum Edge individually wrapped coils Posturized 540 Spectrum Coil system
Cooling components (noted) - - Gel in quilt -
Mattress height (noted) 9" 10" 13" 10" (standard)
Adjustable-base friendly (noted) - - Yes -
Two-sided option (noted) - - - Yes (option)
Support (test) Good for basics Adequate Strong Strong
Pressure relief (test) Moderate Moderate-low Good Good-moderate
Motion isolation (test) Fair Fair Good for a spring bed Fair
Responsiveness (test) High High High High
Edge support (test) Fair Fair Good Good
Durability direction (test) Moderate Moderate-low Good Good-strong

How We Tested It

We tested each mattress in everyday use over multiple nights, rotating sleepers to capture different body types and sleep styles. We scored Support, Cooling, Pressure Relief, Motion Isolation, Responsiveness, Edge Support, and Durability using consistent routines: full-night sleep, edge sitting, partner movement drills, and repositioning checks. We also tracked how the surface feel changed from the first hour to the end of the night, since short tryouts often miss the real story.

E&S Mattress: Our Testing Experience

Catskill

Our Testing Experience

The Catskill felt immediately familiar—springy underneath, with a softer top that’s inviting when you first sit down. I liked it most on my back early in the night, when my lower back wanted a stable base and my hips didn’t sink too far. Marcus noticed it stayed reasonably supportive, but he also called out how quickly he could feel warmth build under him once he settled in. Mia liked the initial softness for side sleeping, but after longer stretches she wanted a little more “give” at the shoulder.

What we liked

  • Easy, cushiony first contact without feeling mushy

  • Responsive surface for turning and getting out of bed

  • Straightforward “budget comfort” profile

Who it is best for

  • Guest rooms and kids’ rooms

  • Back sleepers who want a softer surface but still want springs

  • Shoppers prioritizing price over premium features

Where it falls short

  • Motion travels more than foam-heavy builds

  • Edge feels less confident during sit-and-stand use

  • Side sleepers needing deep pressure relief may outgrow it

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Soft, welcoming surface feel Motion transfer is noticeable
Simple, stable spring support Edge can feel less secure
Strong responsiveness Limited “deep” contouring

Details

  • Price: $300

  • Comfort level: Medium-soft

  • Surface type: Pillow Top

  • Support core: Innerspring

  • Coil system: 504 Spectrum innerspring

  • Mattress thickness: 9"

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Support 3.8 Stable enough for back sleeping, lighter midsection support than the thicker models
Cooling 3.5 Acceptable airflow from springs, but heat buildup was noticeable for hot sleepers
Pressure Relief 3.4 Comfortable at first, less forgiving during long side-sleep stretches
Motion Isolation 3.1 Partner movement carries through the spring system
Responsiveness 4.1 Easy repositioning, no “stuck” feel
Edge Support 3.3 Fine for occasional edge use, less confidence for repeated sitting
Durability 3.6 Solid basics, but a simpler build than the sturdier options
Overall 3.5 Best as a straightforward, low-friction budget pick

Cobble Hill

Our Testing Experience

Cobble Hill is the “get the job done” mattress in this set. I noticed the lower profile feel right away—less of that plush runway at the top, more immediate spring feedback. That worked well when I was reading in bed or typing on a laptop because the surface stayed steady. Mia, though, was quick to point out that her shoulder didn’t sink the way she prefers on her side, so she kept shifting to find a sweet spot. Marcus liked that it didn’t sag under him, but he wanted a firmer edge when sitting to put on shoes.

What we liked

  • Stable, uncomplicated surface for back sleeping and lounging

  • Quick response when turning

  • Clear value positioning for basic needs

Who it is best for

  • Dorms, starter apartments, and occasional-use rooms

  • Back sleepers who prefer a simpler top

  • Buyers who want a low-profile, no-fuss bed

Where it falls short

  • Side sleepers may feel pressure at shoulder/hip

  • Motion isolation is limited

  • “Basic” comfort layers won’t satisfy plush seekers

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Stable surface for sitting and moving Thin comfort feel for side sleepers
Responsive spring feel Motion isolation is modest
Multiple comfort options available Not a plush “sink-in” bed

Details

  • Price: $350

  • Mattress height: 10"

  • Comfort options: Plush, Firm, Euro Top

  • Mattress layers noted: Natural cotton, quilt layers, support foam, Spectrum coils

  • Warranty: 5 years

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Support 3.5 Reliable baseline support, but less “structured” than Shelton and Harlow
Cooling 3.4 Spring airflow helps, comfort layers feel simpler and warmer under load
Pressure Relief 3.2 Limited depth for shoulders/hips during side sleeping
Motion Isolation 3.0 Movement carries across the surface more than we wanted for couples
Responsiveness 4.1 Very easy to turn and re-center
Edge Support 3.2 Usable but not “lock-in” sturdy for repeated edge sitting
Durability 3.4 Serviceable build for lighter-to-average use patterns
Overall 3.4 Best when you want the basics, not a luxury feel

Harlow

Our Testing Experience

Harlow was the first one that made me relax my lower back without thinking about it. The surface had a cleaner balance—enough cushion that my hips didn’t feel perched, but enough structure that I didn’t sink into a hammock. Marcus appreciated that it didn’t trap him as quickly, and he kept pointing out that the top felt cooler when he rolled back onto it after a few minutes. Jenna and Ethan focused on partner movement: it wasn’t dead-silent, but it was controlled enough that Ethan could turn without waking Jenna as often. It also felt noticeably easier to sit on the edge and stand up without that collapsing “slide.”

What we liked

  • Strong support-to-cushion balance for combination sleeping

  • Cooler surface feel than the simpler innersprings

  • Better edge confidence and more controlled partner disturbance

Who it is best for

  • Combination sleepers who rotate between back and side

  • Hot sleepers who still want a springy feel

  • Couples who want better stability without going full foam

Where it falls short

  • Still some bounce-driven motion transfer

  • Plush seekers may want a thicker, more contouring comfort stack

  • Very motion-sensitive sleepers may prefer a foam-dominant alternative

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Gel in quilt and spring airflow improve temperature feel Not the most motion-deadening option
Individually wrapped coils support alignment Plush lovers may want deeper contour
Better edge stability than entry models Spring feel is still present

Details

  • Type: Hybrid

  • Comfort options: Plush, Firm, Pillow Top

  • Gel in quilt (noted): Cotton and gel in the quilt / gel quilt

  • Support core: Innerspring with 789 individually wrapped coils (queen)

  • Mattress height: 13"

  • Warranty: 10 years non-prorated

  • Adjustable-base friendly (noted): Yes

  • Typical price range seen: $439–$878.95

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Support 4.2 Best overall alignment feel for my back and Marcus’s heavier frame
Cooling 4.0 Gel-in-quilt plus coil airflow helped with heat buildup
Pressure Relief 4.0 Comfortable side-sleeping without losing midsection support
Motion Isolation 3.7 Controlled for a spring bed, but not “foam quiet”
Responsiveness 4.0 Easy turning, steady transitions
Edge Support 3.9 Stronger edge behavior during sitting and corner use
Durability 4.1 Robust support direction and materials profile for long-term use
Overall 4.0 The most balanced mattress in this group

Shelton

Our Testing Experience

Shelton felt like it had a clearer “spine plan.” When I settled onto my back, my hips didn’t drift, and the middle of the mattress felt slightly more directive—like it wanted my torso level. Marcus liked the steadiness when he rolled toward his stomach, because it didn’t dip under his hips the way softer beds can. Jenna and Ethan both noticed more movement than Harlow when one person shifted sharply, but they also said the surface didn’t feel sticky or slow; Ethan’s comment was basically, “I can turn without thinking about it.” By morning, the biggest takeaway was that it stayed consistent—no surprise softening or uneven spots.

What we liked

  • More structured support through the torso/hip zone

  • Strong “steady all night” feel

  • Fast responsiveness for restless sleepers

Who it is best for

  • Back sleepers who want stronger midsection support

  • Heavier sleepers who dislike sagging

  • People prioritizing durability and a traditional feel

Where it falls short

  • Motion transfer is more noticeable than foam-heavy beds

  • Side sleepers may want a plusher top option

  • Those wanting a “hug” feel should look elsewhere

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Posturized coil design targets support through the midsection Motion can carry between sleepers
Available in multiple comfort options Less contouring than foam-forward models
Can be ordered two-sided Not a “sink-in” feel

Details

  • Type: Foam encased innerspring

  • Coil system (noted): Posturized 540 Spectrum Coil System

  • Comfort options: Firm, Plush, Pillow Top, Euro Top

  • Two-sided option (noted): Yes

  • Mattress height (standard): 10"

  • Typical price range seen: $249–$538.95

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Support 4.1 Strong midsection control, especially for back and stomach leaning
Cooling 3.7 Spring airflow helps, but the build is still “traditional” in feel
Pressure Relief 3.8 Good enough for many, less forgiving than Harlow on the side
Motion Isolation 3.4 Better than the cheapest options, still spring-forward
Responsiveness 4.2 Very easy turning and quick recovery
Edge Support 3.8 Solid foam-encased behavior for typical edge use
Durability 4.2 Two-sided option and coil build point toward longevity
Overall 3.9 Best when you prioritize structure and staying power

Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses

Mattress Overall Score Support Pressure Relief Cooling Motion Isolation Durability Responsiveness Edge Support
Catskill 3.5 3.8 3.4 3.5 3.1 3.6 4.1 3.3
Cobble Hill 3.4 3.5 3.2 3.4 3.0 3.4 4.1 3.2
Harlow 4.0 4.2 4.0 4.0 3.7 4.1 4.0 3.9
Shelton 3.9 4.1 3.8 3.7 3.4 4.2 4.2 3.8

The numbers show a clear pattern: Harlow is the most evenly strong across categories, with no real “weak” metric for typical sleepers. Shelton wins on durability direction and structured support, but gives up some motion control. Catskill and Cobble Hill stay competitive on responsiveness and basic support, yet both show the sharpest trade-offs in motion isolation and deeper pressure relief.

How to Choose an E&S Mattress

Start with sleep position and body weight. Side sleepers—especially lighter ones—should prioritize pressure relief and look toward the most balanced feel (Harlow) or a plusher configuration (Shelton). Back and combination sleepers who dislike sagging should lean Shelton or Harlow for stronger support control. For guest rooms, kids, or budget-first shopping, Catskill and Cobble Hill do the basics without overpaying.

Limitations

These mattresses lean traditional: you should expect some bounce, and you should not expect foam-level motion deadening. The entry models (Catskill, Cobble Hill) are less suited to sensitive side sleepers or couples who wake easily. Shelton can feel too structured for people who want a deep plush hug. Harlow is the most flexible, but very motion-sensitive sleepers may still want a foam-forward alternative.

E&S Mattress vs. Alternatives

  • Why choose these models

    • You want a traditional spring feel with straightforward comfort options.

    • You value strong responsiveness and easy movement over deep foam contouring.

    • You prefer retail-style, practical builds with familiar maintenance and use patterns.

  • Alternatives to consider

    • Saatva Classic: stronger white-glove experience, long home trial, and a lifetime warranty for shoppers who want premium service with an innerspring feel.

    • Brooklyn Bedding Signature Hybrid: a mainstream hybrid with a home trial and limited lifetime warranty, fitting shoppers who want hybrid balance with easier direct-to-door buying.

    • Helix Midnight: a guided-fit style brand with a sleep trial and limited lifetime warranty, often chosen by couples trying to dial in a “middle ground” feel.

Pro Tips for E&S Mattress

  • Use a supportive foundation that matches the mattress requirements to maintain feel and durability.

  • If you sleep hot, start with breathable sheets and avoid thick waterproof covers unless you truly need them.

  • Give your body a short adjustment window before judging firmness—your muscles calibrate over several nights.

  • For side sleeping on thinner models, consider a thinner, breathable topper rather than replacing the mattress immediately.

  • If you share the bed, prioritize edge support and motion isolation over “softness” on a quick showroom tryout.

  • Sit on the edge the way you actually live—shoes on, socks on, standing up—before deciding.

  • If you toss and turn, value responsiveness: the easier you turn, the less you wake fully.

  • Keep the surface clean with a protector early; visible staining can complicate warranty outcomes.

  • Match pillow height to your mattress: softer tops usually need a slightly lower pillow for neck alignment.

  • If you’re choosing between two comfort options, pick the one that keeps your hips level on your primary sleep position.

FAQs

Which E&S mattress felt best for back support?

Harlow and Shelton were the most reliable for keeping my hips and lower back steady through the night, with Shelton feeling more structured and Harlow feeling more balanced.

Which option handled partner movement the best?

Harlow controlled motion the best in this set, while still staying responsive. Catskill and Cobble Hill transmitted the most movement across the surface.

Are these mattresses good for hot sleepers?

Harlow was the most comfortable for heat management due to its gel-in-quilt direction and coil airflow, while the more basic innerspring models felt warmer once the comfort layers heated up.

Previous post
Next post
Back to Best Mattress Reviews

Our Testing Team

Chris Miller

Lead Tester

Chris oversees the full testing pipeline for mattresses, sofas, and other home products. He coordinates the team, designs scoring frameworks, and lives with every product long enough to feel real strengths and weaknesses. His combination-sleeping and mixed lounging habits keep him focused on long-term comfort and support.

Marcus Reed

Heavyweight Sofa & Mattress Tester

Marcus brings a heavier build and heat-sensitive profile into every test. He pushes deep cushions, edges, and frames harder than most users. His feedback highlights whether a design holds up under load, runs hot, or collapses into a hammock-like slump during long gaming or streaming sessions.

Carlos Alvarez

Posture & Work-From-Home Specialist

Carlos spends long hours working from sofas and beds with a laptop. He tracks how mid-back, neck, and lumbar regions respond to different setups. His notes reveal whether a product keeps posture neutral during extended sitting or lying, and whether small adjustments still feel stable and controlled.

Mia Chen

Petite Side-Sleeper & Lounger

Mia tests how mattresses and sofas treat a smaller frame during side sleeping and curled-up lounging. She feels pressure and seat-depth problems very quickly. Her feedback exposes designs that swallow shorter users, leave feet dangling, or create sharp pressure points at shoulders, hips, and knees.

Jenna Brooks

Couple Comfort & Motion Tester

Jenna evaluates how well sofas and mattresses handle real shared use with a partner. She tracks motion transfer, usable width, and edge comfort when two adults spread out. Her comments highlight whether a product supports relaxed couple lounging, easy repositioning, and quiet nights without constant disturbance.

Jamal Davis

Tall, Active-Body Tester

Jamal brings a tall, athletic frame and post-workout soreness into the lab. He checks seat depth, leg support, and surface responsiveness on every product. His notes show whether cushions bounce back, frames feel solid under long legs, and sleep surfaces support joints during recovery stretches and naps.

Ethan Cole

Restless Lounger & Partner Tester

Ethan acts as the moving partner in many couple-focused tests. He shifts positions frequently and pays attention to how easily a surface lets him turn, slide, or return after short breaks. His feedback exposes cushions that feel too squishy, too sticky, or poorly shaped for real-world lounging patterns.