Duxiana is a luxury innerspring line built around a buoyant, supportive feel—and, on select models, zone-by-zone adjustability. I tested four models for spinal alignment, pressure relief, temperature control, motion isolation, and day-to-day usability. Bottom line: these beds suit people who want responsive support and the ability to fine-tune feel, but they’re less appealing if you’re chasing a slow, hugging memory-foam sink.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUX 1001 | 4.1 | Stable support, easy movement, strong airflow | Not as forgiving at sensitive pressure points | Back sleepers and combo sleepers who dislike “stuck” foam | $6,480 |
| DUX 3003 | 4.4 | Pascal zoning, better pressure tuning, controlled bounce | Light sleepers may still notice movement | Side/back combo sleepers who want targeted support | $8,450 |
| DUX 6006 | 4.5 | Deeper contouring, calmer partner movement, sturdy edges | Tall profile; performs best after careful tuning | Heavier sleepers, couples, and anyone wanting deeper suspension | $11,475 |
| DUX 8008 | 4.6 | Pascal zoning plus lumbar adjustment, best low-back fine-tuning | Highest cost; dialing it in takes patience | Back-pain-focused buyers who want maximum adjustability | $14,605 |
Testing Team Takeaways
All four models share the same Dux fingerprint: spring-forward lift, steady support, and a fairly neutral temperature feel. The DUX 1001 is the simplest—easy to move on, but it didn’t give Mia as much shoulder softness on long side-sleep stretches. The DUX 3003 is where zoning started to matter; once we softened the shoulder zone, it became more forgiving without losing midsection support. The DUX 6006 added deeper suspension and made partner movement feel less disruptive when Marcus changed positions. The DUX 8008 gave me the most precise low-back dial once the lumbar support was set.
Duxiana Mattress Comparison Chart
| Mattress | Type | Key Construction | Pascal Cassettes | Lumbar Adjustment | Available Sizes | Height (with top pad) | Spring Count (Queen) | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Price (Queen) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUX 1001 | Innerspring | Two-layer spring construction | No | No | Twin, Twin Long, Full, Queen, Cal King, King | 12.75" | 1,776 | Very good | Moderate | $6,480 |
| DUX 3003 | Innerspring | Interconnected coils + Pascal zoning | Yes | No | Twin Long, Queen, Cal King, Dual Cal King, King, Dual King | 16" | 2,364 | Very good | Moderate | $8,450 |
| DUX 6006 | Innerspring | Dual-base deep contouring + Pascal | Yes | No | Twin Long, Queen, Cal King, King | 20" | 3,288 | Very good | Good | $11,475 |
| DUX 8008 | Innerspring | Pascal + adjustable lumbar support | Yes | Yes | Twin Long, Queen, Cal King, King | 20" | 3,288 | Very good | Good | $14,605 |
How We Tested It
We scored Support, Cooling, Pressure Relief, Motion Isolation, Responsiveness, Edge Support, and Durability using our How We Test Mattresses routines: long holds on back and side positions, timed cooldown checks after heat buildup, seated edge drills (tying shoes, stand-ups), and partner motion tests (shifting and getting in/out). On Pascal models, we swapped cassette firmness under the shoulders, hips, and legs and rechecked alignment and pressure points. Scores reflect what held up over repeated nights, not a quick showroom impression.
Duxiana: Our Testing Experience
DUX 1001

Our Testing Experience
The 1001 feels immediately responsive. When I rolled from back to side, it pushed back without the slow, sinking lag you get on dense foam. It also stayed steady for reading—no gradual slide toward the center as I shifted.
Marcus ran his usual edge routine (sit, lace up, stand) and was surprised how composed it felt under his weight. Mia liked how easy it was to change positions, but after longer side-sleep stretches she noted more shoulder pressure than on the zoned models. Carlos, mostly on his back, liked the even mid-back support but described the comfort as “springs plus top pad,” not a plush cradle.
What we liked:
-
Quick, clean repositioning with minimal sink
-
Stable edge behavior for daily sitting and stand-ups
-
Neutral temperature feel across the night
Who it is best for:
-
Back sleepers wanting a supportive, buoyant surface
-
Combo sleepers who hate slow-responding foam
-
People who prioritize airflow over plush hug
Where it falls short:
-
Pressure relief is less adaptable for petite side sleepers with sharper pressure points
-
Motion is noticeable when a partner shifts quickly
-
Less fine-tuning than Pascal-based models

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Stable support; easy to move on; strong airflow | Less forgiving at shoulders/hips for side sleepers; motion more noticeable; fewer tuning options |

Details
-
Price (Queen): $6,480
-
Sizes: Twin, Twin Long, Full, Queen, Cal King, King
-
Height (with top pad): 12.75"
-
Spring count (Queen): 1,776
-
Comfort layer/top pad: Xupport removable top pad; cotton-covered latex; 2.5"
-
Warranty: Limited 20-year warranty on spring system
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4 | Keeps hips and mid-back level with consistent lift |
| Cooling | 4.3 | Breathable, spring-forward temperature neutrality |
| Pressure Relief | 3.6 | Adequate, but less shoulder give for side sleeping |
| Motion Isolation | 3.5 | Partner movement carries through the spring feel |
| Responsiveness | 4.4 | Easy turns; no “stuck” sensation |
| Edge Support | 4.2 | Strong enough for sitting and near-edge sleeping |
| Durability | 4.6 | Simple construction that resists early softening |
| Overall | 4.1 | Best for shoppers who want straightforward support and mobility |
DUX 3003

Our Testing Experience
The 3003 is where Dux starts to feel customizable. The Pascal system lets you change firmness by zone, so you’re not forced into one all-over feel.
On my first night, I spent a few hours on my back then moved to my side. With the shoulder zone softened, my shoulder settled in more naturally than on the 1001 while my hips stayed well-supported. Mia had the biggest shift here—once we tuned her shoulder zone, her notes stopped mentioning that midnight shoulder roll. Marcus liked that it kept the springy lift but felt more controlled when he repositioned. Carlos called the support “progressive,” meaning it ramped up smoothly instead of jumping from cushion to firm.
What we liked:
-
Targeted tuning for shoulders, hips, and legs
-
Better side-sleep comfort without losing spinal support
-
Balanced bounce that stays controlled
Who it is best for:
-
Side/back combo sleepers needing pressure tuning
-
Couples with different firmness needs
-
People who want spring lift but more refinement
Where it falls short:
-
Light sleepers can still feel sharper partner movements
-
Requires setup time to get zoning right
-
Taller profile than the entry model

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Pascal zoning improves comfort; supportive without feeling hard; strong airflow | Motion still present; tuning takes time; higher profile and cost than entry model |

Details
-
Price (Queen): $8,450
-
Sizes: Twin Long, Queen, Cal King, Dual Cal King, King, Dual King
-
Height (with top pad): 16"
-
Spring count (Queen): 2,364
-
Pascal system: Interchangeable spring cassettes (tunable by zone)
-
Comfort layer/top pad: Xupport removable top pad; cotton-covered latex; 2.5"
-
Warranty: Limited 20-year warranty on spring system
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.6 | Strong alignment with better zone-specific control |
| Cooling | 4.4 | Consistently neutral with spring-driven airflow |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3 | Pascal tuning reduces shoulder/hip pressure |
| Motion Isolation | 3.8 | Improved, but still a spring bed at heart |
| Responsiveness | 4.4 | Turns stay easy even after long stillness |
| Edge Support | 4.4 | Feels stable when sleeping close to the edge |
| Durability | 4.7 | Component approach supports longer useful life |
| Overall | 4.4 | The sweet spot for customization without going fully flagship |
DUX 6006

Our Testing Experience
The 6006 is the first model that clearly adds depth. You feel it when you exhale and the surface settles under you in a controlled way, without losing that Dux lift.
On my back and side, it stayed supportive without the stiff rebound that can push my low back into tension. Marcus reported fewer wake-ups from heat and less after-bounce when he moved. Mia’s side-sleep notes improved again—the bed gave her shoulder room while still keeping her hips from sinking out of line. Carlos liked the consistency late into the night; the feel at hour six was close to what it was at lights-out.
What we liked:
-
Deeper contouring that still feels supportive
-
Better motion calmness than the frame-bed models
-
Strong edge stability for a tall, layered design
Who it is best for:
-
Heavier bodies needing more depth without sag
-
Couples who want premium support with reduced disturbance
-
Side sleepers who need pressure relief but hate slow foam
Where it falls short:
-
Tall profile can feel “bed-like” rather than minimal
-
Setup and cassette dialing-in matter more here
-
Not the right vibe for people who want a plush sink-in hug

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Deep contouring support; improved motion control; premium edge stability | Tall profile; benefits depend on proper tuning; not a slow-sink feel |

Details
-
Price (Queen): $11,475
-
Sizes: Twin Long, Queen, Cal King, King
-
Height (with top pad): 20"
-
Spring count (Queen): 3,288
-
Pascal system: Interchangeable spring cassettes (tunable by zone)
-
Comfort layer/top pad: Xupport removable top pad; cotton-covered latex; 2.5"
-
Warranty: Limited 20-year warranty on spring system
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.7 | Holds alignment with deeper, more adaptive suspension |
| Cooling | 4.5 | Strong airflow; less heat buildup during position changes |
| Pressure Relief | 4.5 | Shoulder/hip comfort improves with depth and tuning |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Noticeably calmer, though not “dead” like dense foam |
| Responsiveness | 4.3 | Still easy to move, slightly more “settle” than frame beds |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | Confident sitting edge and stable near-edge sleeping |
| Durability | 4.8 | Built for long-term resilience with replaceable components |
| Overall | 4.5 | The best blend of depth, tuning, and everyday stability |
DUX 8008

Our Testing Experience
The 8008 was the most adjustable in a way I could feel in my lower back. I approached it like calibration: sleep a couple of nights, make a small change, repeat.
Once I dialed the lumbar support into the right spot, my usual morning tightness eased—less first-stand stiffness, more “normal back” right away. Marcus said it felt the most controlled when he dropped into bed and shifted; the surface didn’t ripple as long. Mia liked it close to the 6006 for side sleeping, but she called out how steady it felt after long, still stretches. Carlos also noted that the lumbar tuning didn’t create a ridge; support rose to meet him rather than pushing him up.
What we liked:
-
Best low-back tuning once the lumbar support is dialed
-
Pascal flexibility plus a more targeted support adjustment
-
Premium stability that stays consistent through the night
Who it is best for:
-
Back sleepers prioritizing lumbar comfort and alignment
-
Couples who want top-end adjustability without an “airbed” feel
-
People who like springs but need more precision
Where it falls short:
-
Most expensive option here
-
Requires patience to tune rather than “set and forget”
-
Overkill if you already sleep comfortably on simpler support

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Lumbar adjustment adds precision; strong overall stability; excellent long-term support feel | Highest cost; tuning takes time; not necessary for uncomplicated sleepers |

Details
-
Price (Queen): $14,605
-
Sizes: Twin Long, Queen, Cal King, King
-
Height (with top pad): 20"
-
Spring count (Queen): 3,288
-
Pascal system: Interchangeable spring cassettes (tunable by zone)
-
Lumbar adjustment: Adjustable lumbar support
-
Comfort layer/top pad: Xupport removable top pad; cotton-covered latex; 2.5"
-
Warranty: Limited 20-year warranty on spring system
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.8 | Best alignment control with lumbar fine-tuning |
| Cooling | 4.5 | Strong airflow and consistent temperature neutrality |
| Pressure Relief | 4.5 | Deep support plus zoning reduces joint pressure |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Calmer than frame beds, still spring-responsive |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Easy movement, slightly more “engineered” feel |
| Edge Support | 4.6 | Very stable perimeter for sitting and edge sleeping |
| Durability | 4.8 | Built for long-term performance and component renewal |
| Overall | 4.6 | The top pick for precision support, especially at the low back |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUX 1001 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 3.6 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| DUX 3003 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| DUX 6006 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 4.3 |
| DUX 8008 | 4.6 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.8 | 4.2 |
On scores alone, the 6006 and 8008 are the most complete packages: excellent support and durability, better motion control, and still easy to move on. The 1001’s main compromise is pressure relief for sensitive side sleepers. The 3003 is the smartest step up if you want noticeable comfort tuning without moving into the tallest builds.
How to Choose a Duxiana Mattress
Start with how hands-on you want to be. If you want simple, springy support and minimal fuss, the DUX 1001 is the most straightforward entry. If you’re a side sleeper who needs shoulder relief—or you and a partner want different feels—go with the DUX 3003 for Pascal zoning. If you want more depth and a calmer surface for couples, the DUX 6006 is the most balanced upgrade. If low-back comfort is the priority and you want the most precision, the DUX 8008 is the flagship choice.
Limitations
Dux beds stay spring-forward, so even the top models won’t mimic a slow, hugging foam mattress. Pascal models reward dialing-in, and they can feel underwhelming if you never adjust the zones to match your body. The taller 6006 and 8008 can also look and feel substantial on low-profile frames or in smaller rooms. Motion control improves as you move up the line, but none of these are completely “dead still.”
Duxiana Vs. Alternatives
Why choose these models
-
Zone-by-zone tuning with Pascal for shoulders, hips, and legs
-
Responsive, spring-driven movement that stays easy for combo sleepers
-
A replaceable top pad system that makes long-term maintenance simpler
Alternatives to consider
-
Hästens: traditional ultra-luxury feel for buyers who want natural-fiber craftsmanship
-
Vispring: high-end pocket-spring comfort with a classic “British luxury” profile
-
Saatva Classic: a more accessible innerspring option if you want bounce and support for less
Pro Tips for Duxiana Mattresses
-
Start with a neutral setup, then change one thing at a time and sleep on it for a few nights before adjusting again.
-
On Pascal models, start with the shoulder zone. Getting that right often improves neck and upper-back tension.
-
If you run hot, keep your top layers breathable. Thick, non-breathable protectors can trap heat.
-
Match pillow loft to your main sleep position; zoning can’t fix a pillow that’s too high or too low.
-
Test edge support with real routines—tying shoes, getting dressed—not just a quick sit.
-
During the first week, try different spots on the mattress instead of sleeping in one exact place every night.
-
Protect the removable top pad; it’s what you feel most, and it’s meant to be the component you replace first.
-
If your low back feels tight, focus on keeping your hips level on your back before you chase extra softness.
-
Re-check your setup after major changes (injury, training, weight shifts) instead of assuming it will stay dialed in.
FAQs
Do these mattresses feel soft or firm?
They skew buoyant and supportive first. On Pascal models, you can soften the shoulder and hip zones for better pressure relief without losing that springy lift.
Which one is best for side sleepers with shoulder pressure?
The DUX 3003 is usually the easiest to tune—softening the shoulder zone can make a quick difference. The DUX 6006 adds more depth and can feel better for long side-sleep stretches.
Do they sleep hot?
In our testing, the spring-forward build stayed fairly neutral. The taller 6006 and 8008 maintained airflow well, even after repeated position changes.
Will I feel my partner move?
More on the DUX 1001, less on the 6006 and 8008. Still, none of these feel completely motion-dead the way dense foam can.
Is the premium price mainly about durability or comfort?
Both. The upgrade matters most when you benefit from zoning and precision support, not just from a firmer mattress.