Medley builds its sofas to order, with a wider choice of lengths, upholstery, and cushion materials than most ready-to-ship brands. We tested the Rio, Lala, Kirnik, and Blumen during laptop work, movie nights, naps, and small gatherings. The differences became clear quickly: Rio is the best all-purpose choice, Lala is softer, Kirnik gives the strongest upright support, and Blumen is built for deep lounging. We also tracked heat, cleaning access, and how easily each model could fit into a real room.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Strengths | Trade-Offs | Best For | Regular Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rio Sofa | 4.4 | Balanced seat, reliable back support, accessible zippered covers | Too controlled for sink-in lounging | Mixed-use rooms; family rooms | From $2,335 |
| Lala Sofa | 4.3 | Softer top feel, four lengths, strong value | Less stable for desk-style sitting | Apartments and smaller rooms; movie nights | From $2,295 |
| Kirnik Sofa | 4.3 | Best upright support, resilient latex-and-wool cushions | Highest price in the group | Upright sitters; people who prefer a higher seat | From $4,595 |
| Blumen Sofa | 4.0 | Deep seat, useful wide arms, excellent nap space | Large footprint; shorter users need a back pillow | Dedicated loungers; rooms that suit a deep-seat sofa | From $2,995 |
Testing Team Takeaways
Rio is our best overall pick because it moves comfortably between work, TV, and guests without forcing a single sitting position. Choose Kirnik when upright support and an easier stand-up motion matter more than price. Lala offers the softest everyday feel in the smallest available size, making it the better fit for relaxed sitting in a compact room. Blumen is the clear lounge specialist: excellent for curling up or napping, but a poor match for short legs or formal sitting.
Medley Sofa Comparison Chart
| Spec / Test Item | Kirnik Sofa | Lala Sofa | Rio Sofa | Blumen Sofa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $4,595 | $2,295 | $2,335 | $2,995 |
| Seat depth | 23" | 23" | 22" | 24" or 28" |
| Seat height | 19" | 18" | 18" | 18" |
| Overall depth | 36" | 37" | 37" | 40" or 44" |
| Total height | 33" | 33" | 33" | 33" |
| Length options | 78", 92", 106" | 59", 75", 85", 95" | 66", 82", 92", 102" | 87", 97", 111" |
| Seat cushion | Natural latex + wool wrap | 2.5 lb HR poly foam | 2.5 lb HR poly foam | 2.5 lb HR poly foam |
| Back pillows | Wool fiber-filled | Poly fiber; down option offered | Poly fiber; down option offered | Poly fiber; down option offered |
| Cover access | Removable, zippered covers | Removable, zippered covers | Removable, zippered covers | Removable, zippered covers |
| Firmness feel | Medium and supportive | Medium with plush top feel | Medium and supportive | Medium with a lounge-first feel |
| Back feel | Most upright | Relaxed with moderate support | Supports upright sitting | Built for reclining |
| Cleaning feel | Easy access for spot cleaning | Straightforward routine upkeep | Simple spot-clean access | Easy access; more fabric to cover |
| Delivery | Made to order; White Glove from $195 | Made to order; White Glove from $195 | Made to order; White Glove from $195 | Made to order; White Glove from $195 |
How We Tested It
We put every sofa through the same routine: laptop sessions, relaxed streaming, short naps, and evenings with several people changing seats. We measured the delivered dimensions, cushion compression and recovery, and surface-temperature change during a 60-minute sit.
Our 5-point ratings cover assembly, cooling, comfort, durability, layout practicality, cleaning, and value. We separated comfort into seat feel, back support, depth fit, and ease of repositioning so a soft lounge sofa could not hide poor posture support behind one broad score.
Medley Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Here is what changed from one model to the next in daily use, followed by the main trade-offs, specifications, and full score breakdown.
Rio Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Rio was the easiest sofa to use across different parts of the day. I could work near the front edge without sliding into a slouch, while Marcus could settle in for a long gaming session without the cushion rolling under his thighs. Our sample measured 22.1" deep and 18.0" high, almost exactly matching the listed dimensions. Under our seated load, the cushion settled to 15.8" and recovered 96% of its height within five minutes. The upholstery warmed by 4.2°F over an hour, which felt comfortable without standing out as unusually cool. Mia could still curl up, but Rio never became a sink-in sofa. Its real advantage is how easily you can change positions without rearranging every cushion.
What we liked
-
Balanced support for laptop work, TV, and casual lounging
-
Back support remained steady as we changed positions
-
Zippered covers gave us direct access for spot cleaning
Who it is best for
-
Mixed-use rooms that handle work, TV, and guests
-
Households that need one sofa for several sitting styles
-
People who want moderate depth instead of a deep lounge seat
Where it falls short
-
Does not provide a deep, sink-in feel
-
The cushion top may feel too controlled for plush-seat shoppers

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Supportive, even sit | Not a deep lounge profile |
| 22" depth suits several postures | May feel too controlled for plush-seat shoppers |
| Zippered covers simplify spot cleaning | — |

Details
-
Regular starting price: $2,335
-
Total height: 33"
-
Seat height: 18"
-
Seat depth: 22"
-
Overall depth: 37"
-
Length options: 66", 82", 92", 102"
-
Cushion filling: 2.5 lb high-resilience CertiPUR-US certified poly foam
-
Back pillows: poly fiber-filled; down option offered
-
Frame: blend of solid wood and engineered hardwood
-
Covers: removable, zippered; leather cushion covers are removable but not flippable
-
Manufacturing: North Carolina
-
Delivery: made to order; estimated 8–10-week production time; White Glove service starts at $195 (confirm for your configuration)

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | White Glove delivery left little setup to do |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0 | Stayed comfortable, but heavy throws trapped heat |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Supportive without feeling rigid |
| Back Support | 4.4 | Back cushions stayed supportive for upright viewing |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.5 | 22" depth fit a wide range of postures |
| Durability | 4.5 | Dense foam and frame felt steady |
| Layout Practicality | 4.4 | Multiple lengths made room planning easier |
| Ease of Movement | 4.3 | Easy to shift positions without sticking in place |
| Cleaning | 4.3 | Zippered covers made spot cleaning easier |
| Value | 4.4 | Strong performance for the price tier |
| Overall | 4.4 | Best balance of support, comfort, and flexibility |
Lala Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Lala drew us in faster than Rio because its cushion top gives sooner and its angled back makes relaxed sitting feel natural. Our sample measured 23.1" deep and 18.0" high. With the same seated load used on the other sofas, the seat compressed to 15.4" and returned to 94% of its original height after five minutes. Surface temperature rose 4.7°F during the hour-long sit—slightly warmer than Rio, but never stuffy. Mia could tuck her legs underneath her without losing support, and the 23" depth stayed manageable. The softer response creates more motion when someone drops into the adjacent seat, so Lala is less composed for edge-perching or desk-style work. For a relaxed modern sofa at this price, however, it is the strongest comfort value of the four.
What we liked
-
Softer comfort without a collapsed cushion feel
-
Four lengths, including a 59" option for tight layouts
-
Zippered covers provided easy access for routine cleaning
Who it is best for
-
People who read, stream, or lounge for long stretches
-
Apartments and small living rooms where shorter lengths help
-
Anyone who wants a softer sofa without an extra-deep seat
Where it falls short
-
Less stable for sustained upright work
-
The softer edge is less comfortable for perching

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Soft, relaxed seat | Less stable for upright work |
| Four useful length options | Soft edge is not ideal for perching |
| Removable, zippered covers | — |

Details
-
Regular starting price: $2,295
-
Total height: 33"
-
Seat height: 18"
-
Seat depth: 23"
-
Overall depth: 37"
-
Length options: 59", 75", 85", 95"
-
Cushion filling: 2.5 lb high-resilience CertiPUR-US certified poly foam
-
Back pillows: poly fiber-filled; down option offered
-
Frame: blend of solid wood and engineered hardwood
-
Covers: removable, zippered; leather cushion covers are removable but not flippable
-
Manufacturing: North Carolina
-
Delivery: made to order; estimated 8–10-week production time; White Glove service starts at $195 (confirm for your configuration)

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | White Glove delivery kept setup brief |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.1 | Stayed comfortable until we added heavy blankets |
| Seat Comfort | 4.4 | Soft top with enough support underneath |
| Back Support | 4.2 | Well suited to TV; less stable for desk posture |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.2 | 23" depth favored lounging without feeling excessive |
| Durability | 4.4 | Dense foam and frame stayed stable |
| Layout Practicality | 4.3 | 59" option helped tighter rooms |
| Ease of Movement | 4.2 | Soft cushions required more effort when changing position |
| Cleaning | 4.2 | Zippered access helped routine maintenance |
| Value | 4.2 | Strong value among these four sofas |
| Overall | 4.3 | Best softer option for the price |
Kirnik Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Kirnik made the biggest difference when we wanted to sit upright for more than an hour. Its seat measured 19.1" high and 23.0" deep. Under load, the height dropped to 17.2", then recovered 97% within five minutes—the quickest rebound in the group. The wool-and-latex cushion also limited the 60-minute surface-temperature increase to 3.6°F, our coolest result. Those numbers matched the feel: the seat pushed back gently instead of letting our hips sink, and standing up required less forward rocking. Jenna and Ethan both maintained a more upright movie posture on Kirnik than on the other models. It still has enough depth for casual lounging, but the high price only makes sense if posture, resilient natural materials, and easier transitions are priorities.
What we liked
-
Strongest upright support during long sessions
-
Higher seat reduced the effort needed to stand
-
Latex-and-wool cushions rebounded quickly
Who it is best for
-
People who prioritize steady posture and back support
-
Anyone who prefers a higher, easier-to-exit seat
-
Shoppers willing to pay for natural latex and wool
Where it falls short
-
Costs far more than Rio, Lala, or Blumen
-
Feels too controlled if you prefer a deep slouch

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strongest upright support | Highest price here |
| Higher seat is easier to exit | Not designed for deep slouching |
| Latex and wool rebound quickly | — |

Details
-
Regular starting price: $4,595
-
Total height: 33"
-
Seat height: 19"
-
Seat depth: 23"
-
Overall depth: 36"
-
Length options: 78", 92", 106"
-
Seat cushions: natural latex foam wrapped in wool fiber
-
Back pillows: wool fiber-filled
-
Frame: blend of solid wood and engineered hardwood
-
Covers: removable, zippered; leather cushion covers are removable but not flippable
-
Manufacturing: Los Angeles
-
Delivery: made to order; estimated 8–10-week production time; White Glove service starts at $195 (confirm for your configuration)

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | White Glove delivery left little setup to do |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.4 | Wool-and-latex cushions held the least heat |
| Seat Comfort | 4.3 | Resilient cushioning with controlled give |
| Back Support | 4.6 | Higher seat and steady back supported upright posture |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.4 | 23" depth worked for upright and casual lounging |
| Durability | 4.7 | Frame stayed quiet and cushions rebounded quickly |
| Layout Practicality | 4.2 | Length options helped, but cost is a commitment |
| Ease of Movement | 4.1 | Easy to stand from, but less fluid for slouching |
| Cleaning | 4.3 | Zippered access supported routine upkeep |
| Value | 3.8 | Premium materials cannot erase the steep price |
| Overall | 4.3 | Best upright support and quickest cushion recovery |
Blumen Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Blumen makes the most sense when lounging is the main job. The standard-depth sample measured 24.1" at the seat and 18.0" high; under load, that height fell to 15.3" and recovered to 93% after five minutes. The extra body contact also produced the group’s largest 60-minute temperature rise, 5.1°F. None of that hurt a movie night, but it explains why Blumen felt slower to leave and warmer than Kirnik. The deep seat gave Marcus genuine room to stretch out, while Mia needed a back pillow to keep her feet grounded. The wide arms held a phone and remote without feeling like wasted space. Blumen is excellent at long, laid-back sessions, but it requires both floor area and a willingness to give up quick, upright movement.
What we liked
-
Deep seat provided full stretch-out space
-
Wide arms held a phone, remote, or drink coaster
-
Best nap surface for side-lying or curling up
Who it is best for
-
People who curl up, nap, or stretch out
-
Large rooms with enough clearance around the 40–44" depth
-
People who spend most sofa time in a laid-back posture
Where it falls short
-
Shorter users will probably need a back pillow
-
Slow to exit and poorly suited to formal upright sitting
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Best stretch-out comfort | Large footprint |
| Wide arms provide usable surface space | Shorter legs need a back pillow |
| Removable, zippered covers | Weakest option for upright sitting |

Details
-
Regular starting price: $2,995
-
Total height: 33"
-
Seat height: 18"
-
Seat depth: 24" or 28"
-
Overall depth: 40" or 44"
-
Length options: 87", 97", 111"
-
Cushion filling: 2.5 lb high-resilience CertiPUR-US certified poly foam
-
Back pillows: poly fiber-filled; down option offered
-
Frame: blend of solid wood and engineered hardwood
-
Covers: removable, zippered; leather cushion covers are removable but not flippable
-
Manufacturing: North Carolina
-
Delivery: made to order; estimated 8–10-week production time; White Glove service starts at $195 (confirm for your configuration)

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | White Glove delivery left little setup to do |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.9 | More body contact produced the most heat buildup |
| Seat Comfort | 4.6 | Best comfort for stretching out or napping |
| Back Support | 3.9 | Back pillow is necessary for a shorter upright sitter |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.6 | Depth works for loungers, not shorter upright sitters |
| Durability | 4.4 | Stable feel with dense foam response |
| Layout Practicality | 4.1 | Works in a large room and crowds a tight one |
| Ease of Movement | 3.9 | Deep seat slows quick sits and stand-ups |
| Cleaning | 4.3 | Zippered access helped spot-clean routines |
| Value | 3.9 | Value depends on how often you use the extra depth |
| Overall | 4.0 | Best lounge specialist, but the least versatile |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Depth Fit | Cooling | Durability | Movement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rio Sofa | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Lala Sofa | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.2 |
| Kirnik Sofa | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Blumen Sofa | 4.0 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 3.9 |
Rio earned the highest overall score because no single weakness limits how you can use it. Kirnik posted the best back-support and durability scores, but its 3.8 value rating reflects the much higher price. Blumen led seat comfort at 4.6 and still finished last overall because its depth fit and movement scores were the lowest. Lala stayed within two-tenths of Rio in every listed comfort category and offers the best softer sit for the money.
How Do You Choose Between Medley Sofas?
Start with your usual posture. Kirnik is the clear choice for long upright sessions, while Rio is more versatile if work is only one part of the day. Blumen is worth its footprint when you mainly nap, curl up, or stretch out. Lala sits between those extremes: softer than Rio, easier to place than Blumen, and better suited to everyday lounging than desk-style sitting.
Seat depth is the fastest filter. Rio, Lala, and Kirnik stay within 22–23", while Blumen moves to 24" or 28". Shorter users should begin with Rio; Lala works if they want more softness. Taller users who value an easier stand-up motion should try Kirnik. Blumen best suits couples who stretch out together and have enough clearance for its 40–44" overall depth.
Limitations to Know Up Front
All four sofas use loose back cushions, so none feels like formal seating with a fixed, rigid back. The zippered covers improve cleaning access, but they are not automatically machine-washable; care depends on the selected upholstery. Blumen can leave shorter legs unsupported, and Kirnik costs too much to justify for casual, occasional use. Because upholstery availability affects production, treat the listed 8–10 weeks as an estimate and confirm the current lead time before ordering.
Medley Sofas Vs. Similar Options
Medley is most compelling when your room has tight dimensional limits, you want a specific upholstery or cushion material, or you value zippered-cover cleaning access. The trade-off is a made-to-order wait and less straightforward returns than a stocked sofa.
Room & Board Metro is the strongest alternative to Rio or Lala. Its 22" seat depth is similarly versatile, but its blend-down cushions feel softer and require more fluffing. Metro also offers a conventional retail buying process and a broad price range; choose Medley for more control over materials and made-to-order sizing.
Crate & Barrel Lounge Deep 93 is the closest price competitor to Blumen. Its 46" overall depth is even larger than Blumen’s 40" or 44" frame, and its fiber/down-wrapped cushions deliver a softer sink. Blumen offers more length choices and a cleaner, wider-arm design; Lounge Deep is the better choice if maximum depth matters more than footprint.
Article Sven costs substantially less and is easier to buy from stock. Its fixed 88" size, tufted bench seat, and mid-century look are less flexible than Medley’s configurations. Choose Sven for price and quick availability; choose Medley when exact dimensions, upholstery choice, and replaceable cushion access matter more.
Practical Tips for Living With a Medley Sofa
-
Match seat depth to your normal posture: 22–23" supports upright work, while 24" or more favors lounging.
-
Keep a lumbar pillow nearby if you switch between upright and relaxed positions.
-
If you have pets, choose a fabric that releases hair easily, then vacuum weekly before fur works into the weave.
-
Rotate and flip eligible cushions monthly so the most-used seat does not soften first.
-
Use washable throws on arm tops and front edges during high-use weeks.
-
On Blumen, a firm back pillow helps a shorter user reach the floor; an ottoman does not fix excess seat depth.
-
Add felt or nonslip pads under the legs to protect the floor and reduce small shifts.
-
Blot spills promptly, follow the selected fabric’s care code, and let the area dry fully before another pass to avoid water rings.
FAQs
Is the Rio Sofa firm or soft?
Rio feels medium-supportive. Its cushion compresses enough for comfort without dropping your hips into a deep pocket, so it works well for TV and occasional laptop use.
Which one is best for naps?
Blumen is the best nap sofa. Its 24" or 28" seat gives side sleepers and curled-up loungers more usable space than the other models.
Which model is most back-friendly?
Kirnik gave us the strongest upright support. Its 19" seat height, quick latex rebound, and controlled cushion compression also made it the easiest model to stand up from.
What if I’m petite and deep seats do not work for me?
Start with Rio’s 22" seat. Lala’s 23" seat works if you prefer more softness. Skip Blumen unless you are comfortable using a firm back pillow to shorten the effective depth.