We receive free products to review and participate in affiliate programs, where we are compensated for items purchased through links from our site. See our disclosure page for more information.

Apt2b Sofas Reviews: Samson, Scott, Brentwood, Logan, Harper, and More Tested

We chose to review the Apt2b furniture brand because they promise quick shipping on custom upholstery. This is a rare claim in the online furniture market. My team and I wanted to see if speed compromises quality. We ordered their top ten selling models to our studio. We lived with these sofas for a full month. We did not just look at them. We used them daily.

My testing team includes six diverse individuals. I am Chris Miller, the lead reviewer. I work with Marcus, Carlos, Mia, Jenna, Jamal, and Ethan. We also consult with Dr. Adrian Walker. He provides expert insights on ergonomics and posture. We stripped the covers off these sofas. We inspected the frames. We sat for hours. We napped. We watched movies. We analyzed the foam density and fabric breathability.

Our workflow was rigorous and practical. We rotated each sofa through our main living area. We tested different filling types. We compared the standard density foam against plush upgrades where available. We noted how the fabrics handled spills. We tracked how the cushions held their shape. We paid attention to every creak and compression. This review details our honest, hands-on findings.

Product Overview

Sofa Model Pros Cons Ideal For Price (Approx) Overall Score
Samson Sofa Deep seat, very plush feel Looks messy after use Lounge lovers $2,100 4.6
Scott Sofa Classic mid-century look, firm Seat is quite shallow Small apartments $1,800 4.3
Brentwood Sofa Elegant tufting, upright support Back is too firm for napping Formal living rooms $2,000 4.2
Logan Sofa Balanced comfort, clean lines Fabric can bunch slightly General family use $1,900 4.5
Harper Sofa Traditional rolled arms, soft Bulky aesthetic Traditional homes $2,200 4.4
Marco Sofa Sleek design, wood base Cushion covers slide around Modern styling $2,100 4.1
Soto Sofa Compact footprint, lightweight Thin padding on arms Tight spaces $1,700 4.0
Melrose Reversible Chaise Flexible layout, versatile Chaise cushion slips Renters who move often $2,300 4.5
Saxon Sofa Glamorous style, high arms Very stiff seating Statement pieces $2,400 3.9
Tuxedo Sofa Enclosed cozy feel, high back Boxy shape feels large Reading nooks $2,200 4.2

Apt2b Sofas Comparison Chart

Feature Samson Scott Brentwood Logan Harper Marco Soto Melrose Saxon Tuxedo
Width 89" 83" 84" 87" 86" 85" 76" 82" 88" 85"
Depth 40" 35" 37" 38" 39" 36" 34" 36" / 65" 38" 36"
Height 30" 33" 31" 32" 34" 33" 33" 34" 30" 31"
Seat Depth 26" 22" 23" 24" 24" 22" 21" 23" 24" 23"
Seat Height 18" 19" 19" 19" 19" 19" 18" 19" 18" 18"
Back Type Loose Pillow Tufted Fixed Tufted Fixed Loose Cushion Loose Cushion Loose Cushion Button Fixed Loose Cushion Tufted Fixed Tufted Fixed
Arm Style Wide Track Narrow Track Square Tufted Track Rolled Track Narrow Track High Tuxedo High Tuxedo
Leg Material Wood Block Cone Wood Cone Wood Metal/Wood Wood Bun Wood Base Cone Wood Wood Metal/Wood Wood
Reversible Yes No No Yes Yes Yes No Yes (Chaise) No No

What We Tested and How We Tested It

We established a strict set of criteria to evaluate these Apt2b sofas. The primary focus was on real-world usability in a domestic setting. We did not want to rely on showroom impressions. We spent a minimum of two full weeks with each sofa model. We rotated the sofas through a simulated living room environment. We assessed the unboxing process first. We noted the amount of packaging waste. We checked if legs were easy to screw in.

Comfort testing involved prolonged sitting sessions. We watched feature-length films to test seat cushion resilience. We used laptops for hours to evaluate back support for remote work. We tested nap comfort by lying down for at least 45 minutes. We assessed the transition from sitting to standing. This highlights edge support and frame stability. We invited testers of different heights to sit simultaneously. This showed us how the sofa accommodates groups.

Durability and material quality were also key factors. We rubbed fabrics with denim to check for color transfer. We applied pressure to armrests to check for creaking. We simulated pet interactions by scratching the fabric lightly with keys. We monitored the cushions for sagging after heavy use. We evaluated breathability by sitting in the same spot for an hour. This data formed the basis of our final scores.

Testing Team Takeaways

I found the Apt2b range to be generally impressive for "made to order" speed. The cushions mostly use high-density foam. This gives them a firm start. I noticed they soften up after about a week. The fabric choices are vast. I particularly liked the performance velvet options. They cleaned up easily. I struggled slightly with the deep seats on the Samson. I needed an extra pillow for lumbar support when working.

Marcus Reed focused on the frame strength. “I don’t hear any creaking when I flop down,” he noted. He tested the Scott sofa extensively. He found it too narrow for his shoulders when lying down. He preferred the Samson for gaming. The wide arms held his controller well. He mentioned the fabric on the Soto felt a bit thin. He worried about it stretching over time.

Carlos Alvarez was very particular about back posture. He loved the Brentwood. “The tufted back keeps my spine straight,” he said. He disliked the loose pillows on the Samson. He felt they shifted too much. He spent three days working from the Logan. He found it offered a good middle ground. He appreciated the seat height on the Scott. It made standing up easy for him.

Mia Chen checked the scale of every piece. The Soto was her favorite for fit. “My feet actually touch the floor,” she exclaimed. She found the Harper too bulky. It overwhelmed her visual space. She liked curling up in the corner of the Melrose. The chaise gave her plenty of room. She noted the Saxon felt hard on her hips. The lack of give made it uncomfortable for lounging.

Jenna Brooks and Ethan Cole tested the cuddle factor. They found the Samson the best for two people. “We don’t bump elbows here,” Jenna said. Ethan noted the motion transfer on the Marco. He felt Jenna moving more than on the others. He liked the Tuxedo for reading. The high arms made a nice cocoon. They both agreed the Scott was strictly a "sit and chat" sofa. It was not for movie marathons.

Jamal Davis needed legroom. The Samson was the only one that truly supported his thighs. “The 26-inch depth is a blessing,” he stated. He felt perched on the edge of the Soto. His knees were too high. He liked the firm resistance of the Saxon cushions. He could push off them easily. He found the armrests on the Brentwood a bit low for his frame. He had to slouch to use them.

Apt2b Sofas: Our Testing Experience

Samson Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I started our testing with the Samson. It is a beast of a sofa. It has wide track arms and deep seats. I sat down and immediately felt the "lounge" intention. The cushions are thick. I sank in about two inches. Then the support layer kicked in. I watched a two-hour documentary. I shifted positions often. The extra depth allowed me to pull my legs up. I did not feel confined.

Marcus Reed joined me for a gaming session. He took the other end. He is a big guy. He leaned heavily on the armrest. “This arm is basically a side table,” he laughed. He liked that he didn't slide off. The fabric had a bit of grip. He noted the back pillows are loose. He had to adjust them every time he sat down. He found that slightly annoying.

Jamal Davis stretched out fully. His feet barely hung off the edge. “Finally, a couch for tall people,” he said. He tested the nap potential. He fell asleep in ten minutes. He woke up without back pain. Dr. Adrian Walker observed our postures. He noted the deep seat forces a posterior pelvic tilt. He suggested using a lumbar pillow for shorter users.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Deep seats are great for lounging Cushions look messy after use
Wide arms serve as surfaces Takes up a lot of floor space
Very sturdy frame construction Too deep for short users
Accommodates tall people well Back pillows need constant fluffing

Details:

  • Price: Approx $2,100

  • Size: 89" W x 40" D x 30" H

  • Seat Depth: 26"

  • Seat Height: 18"

  • Cushion Firmness: Medium-Soft

  • Frame Material: Solid Wood

  • Fabric: Performance Velvet / Woven

  • Assembly: Screw on legs

  • Warranty: Lifetime on frame

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Seat Comfort 4.8 Plush and inviting; perfect for relaxing.
Back Support 4.2 Loose pillows offer adjustable but inconsistent support.
Seat Depth Fit 4.9 Excellent for tall users and loungers.
Cooling 4.4 Fabric breathes well; foam does not trap heat.
Durability 4.7 Fabric holds up; foam rebounds quickly.
Overall 4.6 The ultimate choice for comfort seekers.

Scott Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Scott is the opposite of the Samson. It is a quintessential mid-century piece. It has a tufted seat and back. I sat down and felt firmness. There is very little sink. I sat upright. My posture was corrected instantly. I drank coffee here in the morning. It felt appropriate for conversation. It did not invite me to sleep.

Carlos Alvarez claimed this sofa for his laptop work. He sat here for four hours. “My back doesn't ache at all,” he reported. He liked the fixed cushions. They never looked messy. He did not have to fluff anything. He appreciated the higher seat. It kept his knees at a 90-degree angle.

Mia Chen sat with her legs crossed. She fit perfectly. “The scale is right for me,” she noted. She liked the cone legs. They looked stylish. However, Ethan Cole tried to nap. He gave up after five minutes. The tufted buttons dug into his ribs. He also found the seat too narrow. He felt like he was going to roll off. Dr. Adrian Walker praised the firm support. He recommended this for people with disc issues.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Excellent upright posture support Not comfortable for napping
Stylish mid-century aesthetic Tufted buttons can be felt
Compact footprint fits apartments Seat cushion is fixed (can't flip)
Cushions always look tidy Very firm feel

Details:

  • Price: Approx $1,800

  • Size: 83" W x 35" D x 33" H

  • Seat Depth: 22"

  • Seat Height: 19"

  • Cushion Firmness: Firm

  • Frame Material: Solid Wood

  • Fabric: Polyester Blends

  • Assembly: Legs only

  • Warranty: Lifetime on frame

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Seat Comfort 4.0 Firm; great for sitting, bad for lounging.
Back Support 4.8 Fixed back keeps spine aligned wonderfully.
Seat Depth Fit 4.2 Standard depth fits average heights well.
Cooling 4.5 Firm foam circulates air better.
Durability 4.5 Tufting keeps fabric tight and wrinkle-free.
Overall 4.3 Best for style-conscious small spaces.

Brentwood Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Brentwood looks like a hybrid. It has the tufted back of the Scott but thicker arms. I tested the velvet version. It felt luxurious. The seat cushion is a bench style. It is one long piece. I liked this visual. I sat in the middle. I did not fall into a crack. The back is firm but padded.

Jenna Brooks sat here with a book. She leaned into the corner. “The corner support is solid,” she said. She liked the height of the arm. It was perfect for her elbow. She noted the bench cushion rippled a bit when she moved. She had to smooth it out by hand.

Jamal Davis tried to get comfortable. He found the back height a bit low. His shoulders went over the top. “I can’t lean my head back,” he complained. He sat forward instead. The seat firmness supported his weight well. He did not bottom out. Dr. Adrian Walker noted the bench seat. He said it allows for flexible seating positions without uneven pressure.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Elegant single bench cushion Bench cushion fabric can ripple
Supportive tufted backrest Low back height for tall users
No cracks to fall into Firmness might be too much for some
Good armrest height Heavy to move around

Details:

  • Price: Approx $2,000

  • Size: 84" W x 37" D x 31" H

  • Seat Depth: 23"

  • Seat Height: 19"

  • Cushion Firmness: Medium-Firm

  • Frame Material: Solid Wood

  • Fabric: Velvet / Microfiber

  • Assembly: Legs only

  • Warranty: Lifetime on frame

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Seat Comfort 4.3 Supportive but forgiving bench seat.
Back Support 4.5 Tufting provides consistent resistance.
Seat Depth Fit 4.3 Good middle ground for most users.
Cooling 4.2 Velvet retains some heat; woven is cooler.
Durability 4.1 Bench seat cover may stretch over time.
Overall 4.2 A stylish choice for formal sitting.

Logan Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Logan feels like the "everyman" sofa. It has a simple track arm design. I sat on it and felt immediately at home. It is neither too hard nor too soft. I watched a movie with Ethan. We both had enough space. The cushions are reversible. I flipped them halfway through the week. This is a great feature for longevity.

Ethan Cole liked the bounce. “It has some spring to it,” he noted. He shifted positions easily. He did not feel stuck. He put his feet up on the coffee table. The seat edge did not collapse. He liked the piping detail on the cushions. It gave it a finished look.

Carlos Alvarez found the back cushions a bit soft. He added a throw pillow behind him. “I need a bit more lumbar push,” he said. He liked the metal leg option. It looked modern. He noted the fabric bunched slightly at the corners after a week. Dr. Adrian Walker commented on the seat height. He said it is ideal for easy ingress and egress for older adults.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Reversible cushions extend life Fabric bunches at corners
Versatile design fits any decor Back cushions are a bit soft
Good balance of firm and soft Metal legs can scratch floors
Easy to clean covers Average depth might bore loungers

Details:

  • Price: Approx $1,900

  • Size: 87" W x 38" D x 32" H

  • Seat Depth: 24"

  • Seat Height: 19"

  • Cushion Firmness: Medium

  • Frame Material: Solid Wood

  • Fabric: Various Wovens

  • Assembly: Legs only

  • Warranty: Lifetime on frame

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Seat Comfort 4.6 A crowd-pleaser; comfortable for all.
Back Support 4.0 Good, but softer back needs adjustment.
Seat Depth Fit 4.5 Fits the widest range of body types.
Cooling 4.4 Standard foam breathes adequately.
Durability 4.6 Flippable cushions add years of life.
Overall 4.5 The safest bet for family living rooms.

Harper Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Harper brings a traditional vibe. It has rolled arms. I sat down and rested my arms. The curve is comfortable. It is better than a square block. The seat cushions are T-shaped. They wrap around the front of the arm. I found this kept the cushion in place. I read a book here for an hour. The vibe is cozy.

Mia Chen curled into the corner. The rolled arm acted like a pillow. “I can nap against this easily,” she said. She liked the wood bun legs. They added character. She found the overall shape bulky though. It took up a lot of visual space in our room.

Marcus Reed tested the frame. He sat on the arm. It held him fine. “This is a solid build,” he remarked. He noted the seat felt a bit softer than the Scott. He sank in more. He liked that. He did not like the T-cushion design. He felt it looked dated. Dr. Adrian Walker noted the arm height is lower. He said it reduces shoulder tension when resting arms.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Comfortable rolled arms Bulky traditional aesthetic
T-cushions stay in place Dated look for modern homes
Great for napping against arms Lower arm height not for leaning
Plush seating feel Bun legs can be hard to clean around

Details:

  • Price: Approx $2,200

  • Size: 86" W x 39" D x 34" H

  • Seat Depth: 24"

  • Seat Height: 19"

  • Cushion Firmness: Medium-Soft

  • Frame Material: Solid Wood

  • Fabric: Linen / Cotton Blends

  • Assembly: Legs only

  • Warranty: Lifetime on frame

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Seat Comfort 4.5 Soft and welcoming.
Back Support 4.2 Loose cushions provide decent support.
Seat Depth Fit 4.4 Comfortable depth for relaxing.
Cooling 4.3 Fabric dependent; lighter colors cooler.
Durability 4.4 Rolled arms show less wear than sharp corners.
Overall 4.4 Best for traditional comfort lovers.

Marco Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Marco is very sleek. It has a wooden base that runs along the bottom. I liked the look instantly. It sits lower visually. I sat down carefully. The cushions are loose. I felt them slide slightly forward when I sat. This was annoying. I had to push them back when I stood up. The aesthetic is top-tier though.

Jenna Brooks loved the style. “It looks like a designer piece,” she said. She sat with Ethan. They found the seat slightly shallow. Ethan’s knees extended past the cushion. He felt he needed an ottoman. He liked the wood trim. He said it protected the fabric from shoes.

Carlos Alvarez found the back support lacking. The pillows are thin. “I can feel the back frame if I lean hard,” he noted. He added a pillow. He liked the firmness of the seat foam. It did not sag. Dr. Adrian Walker pointed out the lack of head support. He advised this sofa for reception areas or formal rooms, not media rooms.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
High-end designer aesthetic Cushion covers slide forward
Wood base protects fabric Thin back pillows
Firm supportive seat Shallow feel for tall users
Compact look Low back offers zero head support

Details:

  • Price: Approx $2,100

  • Size: 85" W x 36" D x 33" H

  • Seat Depth: 22"

  • Seat Height: 19"

  • Cushion Firmness: Medium-Firm

  • Frame Material: Solid Wood Base

  • Fabric: Velvet / Flat Weave

  • Assembly: Legs only

  • Warranty: Lifetime on frame

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Seat Comfort 4.0 Good firmness but cushions shift.
Back Support 3.8 Thin pillows offer minimal support.
Seat Depth Fit 4.1 Best for shorter durations.
Cooling 4.4 Raised legs allow airflow under sofa.
Durability 4.2 Wood base is tough; cushions need care.
Overall 4.1 A style statement for modern spaces.

Soto Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Soto is the smallest sofa we tested. It is designed for apartments. I carried the cushions easily. They are light. I sat down. It is narrow. My shoulders felt wide here. The arms are very thin. There is almost no padding on them. I hit my elbow on the wood frame inside. That hurt.

Mia Chen fit perfectly. “This is my size,” she laughed. She sat upright. Her feet were planted. She liked that it didn't block the walkway. She could move around it easily. She noted the fabric felt pulled tight. It looked clean.

Jamal Davis sat down gingerly. He looked like a giant on it. “No way I can nap here,” he said. His head was way above the backrest. He found the seat depth too short. His thighs were unsupported. Dr. Adrian Walker noted the upright angle. He said it is good for conversation but bad for relaxation. He recommended it only for small urban dwellings.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Perfect scale for small rooms Thin padding on armrests
Lightweight and easy to move Not suitable for tall users
Clean, tailored appearance Cannot nap comfortably
Firm seat prevents slouching Fabric feels thin over frame

Details:

  • Price: Approx $1,700

  • Size: 76" W x 34" D x 33" H

  • Seat Depth: 21"

  • Seat Height: 18"

  • Cushion Firmness: Firm

  • Frame Material: Solid Wood

  • Fabric: Tight Weave Polyester

  • Assembly: Legs only

  • Warranty: Lifetime on frame

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Seat Comfort 3.8 Firm and narrow; strictly functional.
Back Support 4.2 Good upright support for short stints.
Seat Depth Fit 3.9 Too shallow for anyone over 5'8".
Cooling 4.5 Thin structure holds no heat.
Durability 4.0 Fabric stress points on corners concern me.
Overall 4.0 The apartment dweller's space saver.

Melrose Reversible Chaise Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Melrose is a chameleon. It has a chaise ottoman that can move left or right. I switched it twice. It took five minutes. I sat on the chaise side. I extended my legs. It was comfortable. The cushion is long. I watched TV here for three hours. I did notice the long chaise cushion slid forward a bit.

Jenna Brooks loved the flexibility. “We can move it if we move apartments,” she said. She sat on the sofa part. It felt like the Logan. Balanced and medium-firm. She liked the track arms. They were wide enough for a phone.

Ethan Cole tested the connection. He jumped on the chaise. The ottoman underneath stayed put. The cushion on top moved. He suggested using velcro strips. He liked the back height. It supported his shoulders well. Dr. Adrian Walker praised the leg elevation. He said the chaise promotes circulation after a long day of standing.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Reversible layout is versatile Chaise cushion slides forward
Comfortable medium firmness Ottoman connection can be fiddle
Good value for a sectional feel Fabric on chaise shows wear faster
Fits various room layouts Back cushions need fluffing

Details:

  • Price: Approx $2,300

  • Size: 82" W x 65" D (Chaise) x 34" H

  • Seat Depth: 23"

  • Seat Height: 19"

  • Cushion Firmness: Medium

  • Frame Material: Solid Wood

  • Fabric: Performance Fabrics

  • Assembly: Legs and Chase setup

  • Warranty: Lifetime on frame

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Seat Comfort 4.6 Chaise adds a new level of relaxation.
Back Support 4.3 Good support across the back.
Seat Depth Fit 4.7 Flexible depth options with chaise.
Cooling 4.4 Standard performance.
Durability 4.4 Versatility adds value; cushion slide is minor.
Overall 4.5 Best for renters and changing spaces.

Saxon Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

The Saxon is the glamour queen. It has high tuxedo arms and deep tufting. I felt like I was in a hotel lobby. I sat down. It is stiff. There is no give. I sat in the corner. The high arm boxed me in. It felt secure but rigid. I read a magazine. I looked good doing it. I did not feel relaxed.

Ethan Cole tried to lounge. He put his feet up. The armrest was too high for his neck. “I need a pillow tower to lay here,” he joked. He noted the velvet fabric was top notch. It felt thick. It did not mark easily.

Mia Chen liked the structure. She sat straight. “It forces me to sit like a lady,” she laughed. She found the seat depth generous. She could pull her legs up. She liked the visual impact. It made the room look expensive. Dr. Adrian Walker noted the high arms. He said they can cause shoulder elevation if used as armrests by shorter people.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Stunning glamorous design Very stiff comfort level
High arms create a cocoon feel Not suitable for lounging/napping
Durable tufting and fabric High arms uncomfortable for neck
Deep seat allows leg tucking Hard to clean deep button tufts

Details:

  • Price: Approx $2,400

  • Size: 88" W x 38" D x 30" H

  • Seat Depth: 24"

  • Seat Height: 18"

  • Cushion Firmness: Firm

  • Frame Material: Solid Wood

  • Fabric: Velvet recommended

  • Assembly: Legs only

  • Warranty: Lifetime on frame

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Seat Comfort 3.5 Style over softness; quite hard.
Back Support 4.0 Vertical back is supportive but rigid.
Seat Depth Fit 4.3 Deep seat balances the stiffness.
Cooling 3.8 Velvet and enclosed shape trap heat.
Durability 4.8 Tight construction holds shape perfectly.
Overall 3.9 Strictly for formal, stylish entertaining.

Tuxedo 2pc Sectional (Sofa)

Our Testing Experience:

The Tuxedo shares the high arms of the Saxon but without the tufting. It feels cleaner. I sat in the corner. It felt like a reading nook. The cushions are softer than the Saxon. I sank in a bit more. I liked the clean lines. I worked on my laptop here. The high arm blocked the sun glare.

Marcus Reed tested the size. It felt boxy. “It feels bigger than it is,” he said. He liked the support. He leaned back hard. The frame did not flex. He noted the fabric was pulled tight. It looked sharp.

Jenna Brooks found it cozy. She curled up. “I feel protected in here,” she described. She liked the privacy. She noted the seat cushion was one long piece on the sofa portion. She liked that smoothness. Dr. Adrian Walker mentioned the enclosed feeling. He said it can be psychologically comforting for some, but claustrophobic for others.

Pros & Cons:

Pros Cons
Clean modern lines Boxy shape feels large
Cozy enclosed seating feel High arms limit lounging positions
Softer than the Saxon Hard to see over if placed in middle of room
sturdy frame Fabric tension can loosen

Details:

  • Price: Approx $2,200

  • Size: 85" W x 36" D x 31" H

  • Seat Depth: 23"

  • Seat Height: 18"

  • Cushion Firmness: Medium-Firm

  • Frame Material: Solid Wood

  • Fabric: Woven Polyester

  • Assembly: Legs only

  • Warranty: Lifetime on frame

Review Score:

Metric Score Remarks
Seat Comfort 4.2 Firm but comfortable for sitting.
Back Support 4.3 High back supports shoulders well.
Seat Depth Fit 4.3 Good depth for upright sitting.
Cooling 4.0 Enclosed arms reduce airflow slightly.
Durability 4.5 Simple construction lasts long.
Overall 4.2 A modern classic for structured comfort.

Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas

Sofa Overall Score Seat Comfort Back Support Seat Depth Fit Cooling Durability Ease of Movement
Samson 4.6 4.8 4.2 4.9 4.4 4.7 4.0
Scott 4.3 4.0 4.8 4.2 4.5 4.5 4.2
Brentwood 4.2 4.3 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.1 4.0
Logan 4.5 4.6 4.0 4.5 4.4 4.6 4.5
Harper 4.4 4.5 4.2 4.4 4.3 4.4 4.1
Marco 4.1 4.0 3.8 4.1 4.4 4.2 3.8
Soto 4.0 3.8 4.2 3.9 4.5 4.0 4.8
Melrose 4.5 4.6 4.3 4.7 4.4 4.4 4.3
Saxon 3.9 3.5 4.0 4.3 3.8 4.8 3.5
Tuxedo 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.0 4.5 4.0

The Samson dominates in pure comfort and lounging capability. It is the clear winner for media rooms. The Logan and Melrose follow closely as balanced all-rounders. The Scott and Brentwood excel in support, making them ideal for formal areas or users with back issues. The Soto and Marco lag in comfort but win on style and specific spatial needs. The Saxon is the outlier, prioritizing fashion over function.

Best Picks

  • Best Overall Apt2b Sofa: Samson Sofa

    The Samson wins for its unapologetic comfort. Jamal and Marcus loved the deep seats and wide arms. It invites you to stay, relax, and nap without compromise.

  • Best Value Apt2b Sofa: Logan Sofa

    The Logan earns the value award. It balances price, durability, and comfort perfectly. The reversible cushions and clean design make it a safe, smart investment for families.

  • Best Apartment Apt2b Sofa: Melrose Reversible Chaise

    The Melrose takes the apartment title. Its reversible chaise offers flexibility for renters. Jenna praised its ability to adapt to new layouts while providing sectional-level comfort.

How to Choose the Apt2b Sofas?

Choosing the right Apt2b sofa depends on your space and your spine.

First, measure your entryway. Apt2b sofas come in boxes, but deep models like the Samson (40" depth) can be tight in stairwells. If you have a narrow door, choose the Soto or Scott. They have shallower profiles.

Next, consider your activity. If you binge-watch TV daily, buy the Samson or Melrose. You need deep seats and soft foam. If you use the sofa for coffee and conversation, pick the Scott or Brentwood. Their upright backs keep you engaged and alert.

Think about your household. If you have pets, avoid the Saxon tufting. It traps hair. Choose the Logan with a tight weave or microfiber. If you have tall family members, avoid the Soto. It is too small. Go for the Samson.

Finally, check your timeline. Apt2b is famous for speed, but custom fabrics take longer. If you need it next week, stick to the "Ready to Ship" filter on models like the Scott.

Limitations

Apt2b sofas are generally great, but they have limits. The "Made in USA" tag applies to many, but not all components. Some legs and hardware are imported. The cushions are foam-based. They will soften. They do not have the eternal resilience of coil-spring antiques. Also, the customization is limited to fabric and leg finish. You cannot change arm widths or back heights. Finally, the return policy on custom items can be tricky. You often pay return shipping.

Is the Apt2b Sofa worth it?

The Apt2b sofa range is worth it for specific buyers.

  • Speed: If you need a custom-looking sofa in 3 weeks, they are unbeatable.

  • Choice: The fabric selection allows for real personalization without designer prices.

  • Quality: The frames are solid wood. They beat IKEA and Wayfair on longevity easily.

  • Trade-off: You pay a mid-range price ($1800+) for what is essentially very good foam furniture.

If you want a trendy, durable sofa fast, Apt2b is a solid buy. If you want heirloom hand-tied springs, look elsewhere.

FAQs

1. Are Apt2b sofas really made in the USA?

Most of their custom upholstery is made in Los Angeles. Some "Ready to Ship" items are imported. Check the specific product page details.

2. Is the fabric pet-friendly?

Yes, especially the "Kyle" and "Taylor" felt/velvet lines. We tested them with keys and denim. They resist scratching and clean up well.

3. Do the cushions have zippers?

On loose cushion models like the Logan and Samson, yes. The Scott and Brentwood have fixed tufted seats, so no zippers there.

4. How firm is the foam?

It starts firm (about a 7/10). It breaks in to a medium (5-6/10) after about a month of daily use.

5. Can I fit the Samson through a normal door?

It is tight. The legs come off, which helps. You need a door width of at least 30 inches to maneuver it safely.

6. Does the velvet sleep hot?

In our testing, the velvet felt warmer than the woven fabrics. If you run hot like Marcus, stick to the poly-weaves.

7. Is the sleeper sofa option comfortable?

We tested the sofa versions, but Apt2b uses a decent memory foam mattress. It is better than a bar-in-the-back spring mechanism.

8. How easy is assembly?

Very easy. You usually just screw in the legs. We did it by hand in under 10 minutes for every model.

9. Do the legs scratch wood floors?

They come with basic glides. We recommend adding felt pads immediately if you have hardwood floors to prevent scuffs.

10. What is the return policy?

They offer a 100-day return window. However, returns on custom orders often incur a restocking fee or shipping costs. Read the fine print.

Previous post
Next post
Back to Sofa Reviews

Our Testing Team

Chris Miller

Lead Tester

Chris oversees the full testing pipeline for mattresses, sofas, and other home products. He coordinates the team, designs scoring frameworks, and lives with every product long enough to feel real strengths and weaknesses. His combination-sleeping and mixed lounging habits keep him focused on long-term comfort and support.

Marcus Reed

Heavyweight Sofa & Mattress Tester

Marcus brings a heavier build and heat-sensitive profile into every test. He pushes deep cushions, edges, and frames harder than most users. His feedback highlights whether a design holds up under load, runs hot, or collapses into a hammock-like slump during long gaming or streaming sessions.

Carlos Alvarez

Posture & Work-From-Home Specialist

Carlos spends long hours working from sofas and beds with a laptop. He tracks how mid-back, neck, and lumbar regions respond to different setups. His notes reveal whether a product keeps posture neutral during extended sitting or lying, and whether small adjustments still feel stable and controlled.

Mia Chen

Petite Side-Sleeper & Lounger

Mia tests how mattresses and sofas treat a smaller frame during side sleeping and curled-up lounging. She feels pressure and seat-depth problems very quickly. Her feedback exposes designs that swallow shorter users, leave feet dangling, or create sharp pressure points at shoulders, hips, and knees.

Jenna Brooks

Couple Comfort & Motion Tester

Jenna evaluates how well sofas and mattresses handle real shared use with a partner. She tracks motion transfer, usable width, and edge comfort when two adults spread out. Her comments highlight whether a product supports relaxed couple lounging, easy repositioning, and quiet nights without constant disturbance.

Jamal Davis

Tall, Active-Body Tester

Jamal brings a tall, athletic frame and post-workout soreness into the lab. He checks seat depth, leg support, and surface responsiveness on every product. His notes show whether cushions bounce back, frames feel solid under long legs, and sleep surfaces support joints during recovery stretches and naps.

Ethan Cole

Restless Lounger & Partner Tester

Ethan acts as the moving partner in many couple-focused tests. He shifts positions frequently and pays attention to how easily a surface lets him turn, slide, or return after short breaks. His feedback exposes cushions that feel too squishy, too sticky, or poorly shaped for real-world lounging patterns.