MadeRight’s made-to-order sofas lean into customization—performance fabrics, leather options, and multiple seat builds—at a premium starting around $3,872–$4,660 for the four mainstream sofas I tested. I focused on seat comfort, back support, heat buildup, and how each frame handled real-life lounging, work, and naps. The line’s big strengths are deep seats and sturdy construction; the main drawbacks are fit sensitivity for shorter legs and the price of getting it dialed in.
Product Overview
| Sofa | Starting Price | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venice Sofa | $3,872 | 4.6 | Balanced lounge + work posture | Can feel “too plush” if you perch | Mixed households, all-day use |
| Big Sur Sofa | $4,660 | 4.6 | Big, deep, movie-night comfort | Deep fit isn’t for everyone | Tall loungers, long sessions |
| Sacramento Sofa | $4,124 | 4.5 | Upright-friendly and easy egress | Less “sink-in” lounge feel | Back-sensitive sitters, work + TV |
| Not Called Frisco Sofa | $4,124 | 4.4 | Low, laid-back sprawl vibe | Low seat height can be a dealbreaker | Lounge-first rooms, relaxed posture |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the four sofas, fit drove most of our conclusions: Big Sur’s deeper seat turned into Marcus’s favorite for late-night gaming slumps, while Mia stayed happiest on Sacramento when she wanted her legs to feel more “anchored” instead of dangling. Jamal liked the stretch-out room on all four, but the low Not Called Frisco asked more effort on stand-ups. I kept returning to Venice as the most flexible for switching between laptop posture and a long, quiet movie recline.
MadeRight Sofa Comparison Chart
| Comparison Item | Venice Sofa | Big Sur Sofa | Sacramento Sofa | Not Called Frisco Sofa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Starting price (USD) | $3,872 | $4,660 | $4,124 | $4,124 |
| Overall width | Choose your size | Choose your size | Choose your size | Choose your size |
| Seat depth | 24 3/8" | 26 3/4" | 23 3/4" | 24 1/2" |
| Seat height | 19" | 19" | 19 3/4" | 16" |
| Frame depth | 37" | 40" | 37 1/4" | 37 1/2" |
| Frame height | 30" | 27" | 30 3/4" | 24" |
| Overall height | 33" | 32 1/2" | 32 1/4" | 29 1/2" |
| Arm width | 4" (10" with side pillow) | 5" | 4" | 6 1/2" |
| Arm height | 26" | 22.5" | 23 3/4" | 24" |
| Leg height | 5.5" | 6 1/2" | 2" | 2 1/2" |
| Build fundamentals | Kiln-dried solid wood frame; sinuous springs; high-resilience foam | Same core construction | Same core construction | Same core construction |
| Upholstery options | Performance fabrics and leathers | Performance fabrics and leathers | Performance fabrics and leathers | Performance fabrics and leathers |
| Warranty | Lifetime frame; 5-year cushions & fabric | Same | Same | Same |
| Typical build time | 3 weeks (performance) / 4 weeks (leather) | Same | Same | Same |
| Shipping cost shown | Flat-rate options starting at $199 | Starting at $199 | Starting at $199 | Starting at $199 |
| Delivery timing after build | 7–10 business days | 7–10 business days | 7–10 business days | 7–10 business days |
| Return window | Up to 180 days (terms vary by timing) | Same | Same | Same |
| Perceived seat feel (test) | Medium-plush, easy to settle in | Plush-deep lounge bias | Medium, more upright-friendly | Plush but very low-slung |
| Back support feel (test) | Balanced; easiest to “fine-tune” posture | Great for recline; less for upright work | Strongest “stacked” sitting posture | Relaxed; can feel slouchy for long work |
| Cooling / breathability (test) | Good; less heat-trapping than thick piles | Good, but deep lounging holds warmth | Good; easiest to sit “off” the back | Good; posture can trap heat in long slumps |
| Cleaning (test) | Easy wipe-down routine | Easy, but deeper creases catch crumbs | Simplest daily tidy | Lowest base makes under-sofa cleaning harder |
| Best fit cue (test) | “One-sofa household” versatility | Tall loungers and nap-prone households | Back-sensitive sitters and laptop use | Lounge-first rooms and low-profile style |
How We Tested It
We set each sofa in the same living-room footprint, then rotated through upright laptop work, long movie sessions, and quick naps. For Assembly, we tracked delivery setup and any alignment needed. Cooling was judged by heat buildup during extended sits, while Comfort was logged as seat feel, back support, and seat-depth fit. Durability, Layout Practicality, Cleaning, and Value were scored from cushion recovery, posture changes, routine wipe-downs, and how naturally each design fit everyday life.
MadeRight Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Venice Sofa
Our Testing Experience

I used Venice the way I use most sofas: a focused laptop hour, then a slow slide into a semi-reclined movie posture. Marcus treated the arm area like a “pseudo-bed” during breaks, and Mia kept rotating between cross-legged and side-leaning positions until she found a corner that didn’t pinch her hips. The big surprise was how easy it was to hold a comfortable curve in my lower back without constantly fidgeting.
-
What we liked
-
Easy posture changes without “bottoming out”
-
Balanced feel for mixed-height users
-
Comfortable for long, low-distraction nights
-
-
Who it is best for
-
People who work and lounge on the same sofa
-
Households that want one main daily driver
-
Viewers who shift between upright and reclined
-
-
Where it falls short
-
Perchers who prefer a firmer edge
-
Anyone wanting a very shallow, upright sit
-
Minimalists who dislike a plusher look
-

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Versatile posture range for daily use | Not the best match for very shallow-seat shoppers |
| Comfortable for mixed activities (work, TV, naps) | Softer feel can encourage sliding during long movies |
| Supportive enough to avoid constant repositioning | Plush styling may feel “too relaxed” in formal rooms |
| Solid sense of stability during frequent movement |

Details
-
Starting price: $3,872
-
Overall width: Choose your size
-
Frame depth: 37"
-
Frame height: 30"; overall height: 33"
-
Seat depth: 24 3/8"; seat height: 19"
-
Arm width: 4" (10" with side pillow); arm height: 26"
-
Leg height: 5.5"
-
Cushion customization: three cushion packages available
-
Core construction: kiln-dried solid wood frame; sinuous spring suspension; high-resilience foam
-
Upholstery: commercial-grade performance fabrics and leathers
-
Build time: 3 weeks (performance) / 4 weeks (leather)
-
Shipping: flat-rate options starting at $199; delivery in 7–10 business days after completion
-
Returns: 14-day and 15–180-day windows with different fee structures
-
Warranty: lifetime on frames; 5 years on cushions & fabric
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Straightforward setup experience; easiest when you treat placement as part of the plan. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.4 | Stayed comfortable over long sits; only felt warm when we fully sunk in for hours. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.6 | Balanced “sink + support” feel that worked for movies and laptop sessions. |
| Back Support | 4.5 | Held my lumbar curve better than expected once I found my default spot. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.5 | Middle-of-the-road depth that worked across body sizes in our group. |
| Durability | 4.7 | Cushion recovery stayed consistent through repeated posture changes; frame felt solid. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.3 | Easy to turn and reset, but a plush seat can “invite” sliding forward late at night. |
| Cleaning | 4.5 | Daily wipe-downs were simple; crumbs collect where cushions meet after snacking. |
| Value | 4.3 | Premium pricing, but the versatility keeps it from feeling niche. |
| Overall Score | 4.6 | Strong all-around performer with the fewest fit surprises. |
Big Sur Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Big Sur is where Marcus disappeared for hours: game on, shoulders down, feet up, heat creeping in slowly as the night got long. I noticed the deeper sit immediately—great for stretching out, but it also nudged me to “commit” to lounging earlier than I usually do. Jamal’s long legs finally looked fully supported, and Mia’s feedback was blunt: she loved the comfort but wanted a less demanding seat depth for day-to-day upright use.
-
What we liked
-
Deep-lounge comfort that stays supportive
-
Feels built for long sessions
-
Natural “nap posture” without contorting
-
-
Who it is best for
-
Tall users who want room to sprawl
-
Gamers and binge-watchers who recline early
-
Households that treat the sofa like a landing pad
-
-
Where it falls short
-
Petite users who prefer feet planted
-
People who do lots of upright laptop work
-
Rooms where a large footprint feels tight
-

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Deep seat favors lounging and napping | Seat depth can be “too much” for shorter legs |
| Comfortable for larger frames over long sessions | Upright work posture takes more intentional setup |
| Stable feel during frequent shifting | Bigger footprint can dominate smaller rooms |
| Support stays consistent through long use |

Details
-
Starting price: $4,660
-
Overall width: Choose your size
-
Frame depth: 40"; frame height: 27"; overall height: 32 1/2"
-
Seat depth: 26 3/4"; seat height: 19"
-
Arm width: 5"; arm height: 22.5"
-
Leg height: 6 1/2"
-
Core construction: kiln-dried solid wood frame; sinuous spring suspension; high-resilience foam
-
Upholstery: commercial-grade performance fabrics and leathers
-
Build time: 3 weeks (performance) / 4 weeks (leather)
-
Shipping: flat-rate options starting at $199; delivery in 7–10 business days after completion
-
Returns: 14-day and 15–180-day windows with different fee structures
-
Warranty: lifetime on frames; 5 years on cushions & fabric
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Smooth setup flow when we treated placement as a two-person job. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.4 | Good overall, but deep lounging can hold warmth longer than upright sitting. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.8 | Best “sink in and stay there” seat of the group for long sessions. |
| Back Support | 4.4 | Comfortable in recline; less ideal when I tried to sit tall for work. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.2 | The depth is a love-it-or-leave-it trait depending on leg length. |
| Durability | 4.7 | Held structure through heavy use; cushion recovery stayed reliable. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.2 | Deep seat makes quick posture resets feel slightly “slower.” |
| Cleaning | 4.5 | Easy daily wipe-down; deeper seams catch snacks after movie nights. |
| Value | 4.2 | The price makes the fit decision matter more; perfect for the right body type. |
| Overall Score | 4.6 | A standout lounger with a narrower fit range than Venice or Sacramento. |
Sacramento Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Sacramento was the one I kept choosing when my lower back felt tight: I could sit upright without feeling forced, then relax into a mild recline without losing support. Mia’s test was simple—cross-legged reading and a long phone call—and she reported fewer pressure points than on the deeper Big Sur. Jamal liked how easy it was to stand up and reset after stretching, and Marcus said it was the least “hammocky” when he sat on the edge between gaming rounds.
-
What we liked
-
Most natural upright-to-relaxed transition
-
Easy stand-ups and edge use
-
Consistent support across positions
-
-
Who it is best for
-
Back-sensitive sitters who want structure
-
Mixed-use living rooms (work + TV)
-
People who hate fighting a cushion to move
-
-
Where it falls short
-
Hardcore loungers wanting a deep sink
-
Anyone chasing a very low, slouchy vibe
-
Nappers who want a “pit” feel
-

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Best upright comfort in the lineup | Less “sink-in” than the lounge-first models |
| Easy to stand up and reset positions | Not the deepest seat for full sprawl |
| Strong day-to-night versatility | Low-profile loungers may find it too structured |
| Edge sitting stays comfortable for quick tasks |

Details
-
Starting price: $4,124
-
Overall width: Choose your size
-
Frame depth: 37 1/4"; frame height: 30 3/4"; overall height: 32 1/4"
-
Seat depth: 23 3/4"; seat height: 19 3/4"
-
Arm width: 4"; arm height: 23 3/4"
-
Leg height: 2"
-
Core construction: kiln-dried solid wood frame; sinuous spring suspension; high-resilience foam
-
Upholstery: commercial-grade performance fabrics and leathers
-
Build time: 3 weeks (performance) / 4 weeks (leather)
-
Shipping: flat-rate options starting at $199; delivery in 7–10 business days after completion
-
Returns: 14-day and 15–180-day windows with different fee structures
-
Warranty: lifetime on frames; 5 years on cushions & fabric
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | No surprises in setup; easiest when you plan the final placement first. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.4 | Stayed comfortable over long sits because we spent more time upright. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.5 | Comfortable without feeling marshmallow-soft; good “daily seat.” |
| Back Support | 4.7 | Most reliable support when I tried to sit tall after desk work. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.5 | Shallower feel helped shorter legs while still giving room to lounge. |
| Durability | 4.7 | Held shape and posture consistency through repeated daily use. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.4 | Quick to shift, perch, stand, and reset without sinking “pockets.” |
| Cleaning | 4.5 | Practical day-to-day wipe-down and upkeep with performance-style upholstery. |
| Value | 4.4 | Expensive, but the broad fit makes the spend easier to justify. |
| Overall Score | 4.5 | The best choice when posture and daily usability outrank deep lounging. |
Not Called Frisco Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Not Called Frisco is the “commit to lounging” option. The low seat height changed how I used it: I naturally slid into a laid-back posture fast, then stayed there longer than planned. Marcus loved the low-and-loungy setup for late-night TV, but he also noticed he had to brace more when standing up quickly. Jamal enjoyed stretching out, yet even he admitted the low profile made frequent up-down cycles feel less effortless.
-
What we liked
-
Lounge-first comfort for long nights
-
Easy to sprawl without overthinking posture
-
Relaxed vibe that encourages downtime
-
-
Who it is best for
-
People who recline early and often
-
Rooms built around movies and gaming
-
Tall loungers who want low-profile style
-
-
Where it falls short
-
Anyone with knee/hip issues on stand-ups
-
Shorter users who need feet planted
-
Upright laptop work as a daily habit
-

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Low, loungy feel is instantly relaxing | Low seat height makes stand-ups harder for some |
| Great for sprawling and casual TV nights | Not ideal for upright, structured sitting |
| Comfortable “sink in” posture for long sessions | Fit can be tricky for shorter legs |
| Strong stability once settled in |

Details
-
Starting price: $4,124
-
Overall width: Choose your size
-
Frame depth: 37 1/2"; frame height: 24"; overall height: 29 1/2"
-
Seat depth: 24 1/2"; seat height: 16"
-
Arm width: 6 1/2"; arm height: 24"
-
Leg height: 2 1/2"
-
Core construction: kiln-dried solid wood frame; sinuous spring suspension; high-resilience foam
-
Upholstery: commercial-grade performance fabrics and leathers
-
Build time: 3 weeks (performance) / 4 weeks (leather)
-
Shipping: flat-rate options starting at $199; delivery in 7–10 business days after completion
-
Returns: 14-day and 15–180-day windows with different fee structures
-
Warranty: lifetime on frames; 5 years on cushions & fabric
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Setup was smooth; the bigger decision was how low seating changes your room flow. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.3 | Comfortable overall, but the laid-back posture held warmth longer during long sessions. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.7 | Best “melt into the couch” vibe when the goal is pure relaxation. |
| Back Support | 4.1 | The low, loungy posture can turn into a slouch if you try to work upright. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | The combination of depth and low height narrows the fit for shorter legs. |
| Durability | 4.7 | Cushion recovery stayed consistent; frame stability felt dependable. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.0 | The low seat makes frequent stand-ups and quick resets less effortless. |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | Wipe-downs were easy, but the low base made under-sofa cleaning more annoying. |
| Value | 4.2 | Strong if you love the low profile; weaker if you need multi-posture flexibility. |
| Overall Score | 4.4 | A specialized lounger that’s excellent when the low seat height fits your body. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venice Sofa | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.3 |
| Big Sur Sofa | 4.6 | 4.8 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Sacramento Sofa | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.4 |
| Not Called Frisco Sofa | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.7 | 4.0 |
Numerically, Venice and Sacramento are the most even: fewer “extreme” traits, fewer fit surprises. Big Sur wins the pure lounge category (seat comfort), but gives some of that back in seat-depth fit. Not Called Frisco is the most polarized: amazing when you want low-slung relaxation, less forgiving when you need frequent upright posture and easy stand-ups.
How to Choose a MadeRight Sofa
Start with fit: if you’re petite or prefer feet planted, prioritize Sacramento or Venice; if you’re tall and want a deep lounge posture, Big Sur is the easiest win. Think about your default night: if you recline early and stay there, Not Called Frisco fits the “low and loungy” lifestyle; if you shift between work, TV, and short naps, Venice is the cleanest all-rounder. For back-sensitive sitters, Sacramento delivered the most dependable upright support.
Limitations
These sofas reward careful fit decisions: seat depth and seat height differences are meaningful, and the wrong combo can turn comfort into constant repositioning. The low seat height on Not Called Frisco can be rough for knee/hip-sensitive users, while Big Sur’s depth can frustrate shorter legs during everyday upright use. The lineup also sits firmly in premium pricing, so the cost of “getting it right” matters more than with mass-market couches.
MadeRight Sofa vs. Alternatives
-
Why choose these models
-
Built-for-longevity core materials and strong warranty structure
-
Custom sizing and fit-first approach for real rooms
-
Performance-oriented upholstery options for daily life
-
-
Alternatives to consider
-
Room & Board Metro: a widely proven, mainstream “Goldilocks” sofa
-
Crate & Barrel Lounge Deep: deep-seat lounging with broad configurations
-
West Elm Harmony: plush, deep lounging with a softer, sink-in bias
-
Pro Tips for MadeRight Sofas
-
Measure how you actually sit: feet planted, legs tucked, or fully stretched out, then match that to seat depth and seat height.
-
If you’re between sizes, pick based on your “most frequent” activity, not the occasional hosting scenario.
-
Treat seat depth like a fit parameter, not a style preference—deep seats change back support mechanics over hours.
-
Use fabric swatches in your actual lighting, then re-check at night under TV light before committing.
-
Rotate and re-fluff cushions on a routine schedule to even out wear patterns.
-
Keep a small throw or lumbar pillow nearby if you alternate between upright work and recline-heavy lounging.
-
For low-profile seats, plan a clear stand-up path (coffee table distance matters more than you think).
-
If pets are in the mix, keep a washable throw on the “favorite spot” and spot-clean quickly after spills.
-
When you move or rearrange, re-test your viewing angles—small layout shifts can change how a sofa feels.
FAQs
Which sofa felt best for lower-back sensitivity?
Sacramento was the most consistent for upright support, while Venice was the easiest to fine-tune between upright and reclined comfort.
Which model is most comfortable for tall loungers?
Big Sur gave the most natural stretch-out posture, and it stayed comfortable through long sessions.
Is Not Called Frisco too low for everyday use?
If you stand up frequently or have knee/hip sensitivity, the low seat height can become tiring over time.
How different do the seats feel day to day?
Venice and Sacramento felt the most “all-day” adaptable; Big Sur and Not Called Frisco encouraged lounging earlier and longer.