AllModern’s sofas lean clean and casual. In our hands-on testing, the biggest differences showed up in seat depth, how the back felt after a long stretch of sitting, and how much upkeep the fabric seemed to need in day-to-day use. Some models feel more upright and steady, while others are built to let you sink in and stay there.
Product Overview
| Sofa | Sale Price | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geo 84" Upholstered Sofa | $1,199 | 4.3 | Supportive feel, strong durability ratings, reversible cushions | Less lounge-depth for tall sprawlers | Mixed use: TV + conversation |
| Miller 84'' Upholstered Sofa | $1,249 | 4.2 | Easy posture changes, higher seat, clean silhouette | Not reversible; velvet can show pressure marks | Daily seating, small-to-mid rooms |
| Rae 84'' Upholstered Sofa | $1,549 | 4.1 | Deeper lounge posture, plush “sink-in” comfort | Runs warmer; velvet needs gentler care | Movie marathons and napping |
| Moab 81'' Upholstered Sofa | $1,349 | 4.1 | Textured upholstery, balanced support, easy everyday upkeep | Low seat height for some users | Casual lounging with a cleaner look |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the four models, the same trade-off kept showing up in our testing: the deeper, softer seats were better for long lounge sessions, but they asked for more upkeep and gave up some back support. The most balanced pick was the one that paired moderate depth with the strongest durability signals. The easiest sofa to nap on was also the least structured. For couples, the best performer was the model that stayed settled when one person shifted around mid-movie.
AllModern Sofa Comparison Chart
| Comparison Item | Geo 84" Upholstered Sofa | Miller 84'' Upholstered Sofa | Rae 84'' Upholstered Sofa | Moab 81'' Upholstered Sofa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall dimensions (H × W × D) | 34" × 83" × 35" | 34" × 84" × 35" | 32" × 84" × 39.5" | 29" × 81" × 36" |
| Seat height | 18" | 19.3" | 18" | 17.7" |
| Seat depth | 21" | 22.4" | 32.3" | 22" |
| Upholstery material / texture | Fabric (includes performance velvet options) | Velvet | Velvet | Textured fabric option shown |
| Frame material | Solid wood | Solid wood | Kiln dried hardwood | Kiln dried hardwood |
| Seat support | Sinuous springs | Web suspension | Web suspension + sinuous springs | Web suspension + sinuous springs |
| Cushion / fill | Foam + polyester | Fiber wrapped foam | Feather blend; down/feather components in back fill | Foam + synthetic fiber; feather-blend noted |
| Reversible cushions | Yes | No | Yes | - |
| Removable cushion cover | Yes | Yes | Yes | - |
| Weight capacity | 700 lb | 800 lb | 900 lb | - |
| Durability (rub count) | 30,000–50,000 | - | 15,000–30,000 | 15,000–30,000 |
| Return policy | 30 days | 30 days | 30 days | - |
| Delivery note shown | Free full service delivery | - | Free full service delivery | - |
How We Tested It
We put each sofa through the same routine: assembly checks, repeated TV-night posture changes, laptop sessions, and one long weekend lounge block to see how support held up over time. During hands-on testing, we tracked cooling and breathability, comfort, durability signals, layout practicality, cleaning effort, and value. We also paid close attention to how each sofa felt for different body sizes and when two people shared the seat.
AllModern Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Geo 84" Upholstered Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
On the Geo, I kept settling into the same pattern: upright enough for laptop work, then a small slide back once the movie started. The seat had enough give to feel comfortable, but it never let my hips sink too far. Mia Chen liked that her feet didn’t feel stranded, and she could still curl up without fighting extra depth. When Jenna Brooks and Ethan Cole shared it for a full movie, the seat stayed steady instead of bouncing around when one person shifted.
What we liked
-
Even support that held up over long sitting sessions
-
Reversible cushions that make routine upkeep easier
-
A steadier feel when posture changed often
Who it is best for
-
Mixed-use living rooms where one sofa has to do a little of everything
-
Petite-to-average sitters who do not want an extra-deep seat
Where it falls short
-
Tall loungers who want more room to sprawl
-
Anyone chasing a softer, cloud-like sit
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Balanced support for upright-to-relaxed posture changes | Not the deepest lounge seat |
| Strong durability indicators for daily use | Velvet/fabric options can still show pressure in some lighting |
| Reversible cushions for longer-term upkeep |
Details:
-
Sale price shown: $1,199 (was $1,299)
-
Overall dimensions: 34" H × 83" W × 35" D
-
Seat: 18" H × 74" W × 21" D
-
Upholstery: performance velvet options shown
-
Frame material: solid wood
-
Seat construction: sinuous springs
-
Fill: foam + polyester; foam density 1.8 lbs./cu. ft.
-
Includes 2 accent pillows; removable cushion cover; reversible cushions
-
Weight capacity: 700 lb; rub count 30,000–50,000
-
Assembly required; warranty length 1 year; 30-day return policy
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Straightforward setup with predictable steps |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0 | Comfortable, but upholstery can retain some warmth |
| Seat Comfort | 4.3 | Supportive without feeling stiff |
| Back Support | 4.2 | Holds a neutral posture well over long viewing |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.1 | Great for upright-to-relaxed; less for full sprawl |
| Durability | 4.6 | Strong rub-count and construction indicators |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.2 | Cushion handling and repositioning felt manageable |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | “Easy to clean” upholstery positioning and removable cover help |
| Value | 4.4 | Strong performance per dollar at the listed markdown |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Most balanced mix of support, durability, and everyday practicality |
Miller 84'' Upholstered Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
The Miller felt quickest to get in and out of. That slightly higher seat made standing up easier, and during laptop sessions I stayed naturally more upright. It never gave me that slow slide forward softer sofas sometimes do. Jenna and Ethan liked how composed it felt when one person changed position, and Mia said it was still deep enough to curl into with a pillow tucked at the side.
What we liked
-
A higher seat that made standing up easier
-
Predictable support when shifting positions
-
A clean shape that works in tighter layouts
Who it is best for
-
People who switch between upright sitting and relaxed leaning
-
Couples who want a seat that stays composed when one person moves
Where it falls short
-
Anyone who wants reversible cushions for longer rotation
-
Shoppers who tend to run warm in velvet
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Easy posture changes; higher seat feels ergonomic | Cushions not reversible |
| Clean, compact footprint for many rooms | Velvet can run warmer for some users |
| Solid stability for shared seating |
Details:
-
Sale price shown: $1,249 (was $1,599)
-
Overall dimensions: 34" H × 84" W × 35" D
-
Seat: 19.3" H × 75" W × 22.4" D
-
Upholstery material: velvet option shown
-
Frame material: solid wood; wood species walnut
-
Fill: foam; cushion construction: fiber-wrapped foam
-
Seat construction: web suspension
-
Weight capacity: 800 lb; seating capacity 3
-
Removable cushion covers; cushions not reversible
-
Assembly required; warranty length 1 year; 30-day return policy
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.4 | Manageable build, easier with two people |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.9 | Velvet warmth shows up in long sessions |
| Seat Comfort | 4.1 | More supportive than plush; good daily comfort |
| Back Support | 4.3 | Upright posture stays easier to maintain |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.2 | Balanced depth for sit-back lounging without over-sinking |
| Durability | 4.2 | Solid frame and capacity, with straightforward cushion build |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.3 | Lighter handling and easy position changes |
| Cleaning | 4.0 | Routine upkeep is simple; deeper marks need attention |
| Value | 4.4 | Strong everyday performance at the listed sale price |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | A practical “daily driver” sofa with a supportive bias |
Rae 84'' Upholstered Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
The Rae was the one I kept stretching out on once a show ran long. Its deeper seat made it easy to settle into a reclined posture without immediately wanting an ottoman. Jenna and Ethan both treated it like a lounge spot, and the softer fill felt inviting, though you could also feel where the seat compressed after a while. Mia liked the cocooning feel, but she also said shorter sitters would probably want an extra pillow behind their back.
What we liked
-
A deeper lounge posture that suits long sessions
-
Plush cushioning that is easy to settle into
-
Wide, supportive arms for leaning or side lounging
Who it is best for
-
People who care most about movie-night comfort and occasional naps
-
Homes that prefer a softer, more enveloping seat feel
Where it falls short
-
Hot sleepers or anyone sensitive to warmer upholstery
-
Buyers who want a firmer, more structured sit
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Deep seat depth supports lounging and napping | Velvet can show pressure and needs careful upkeep |
| Plush, down/feather-influenced feel | Less structured back feel over very long sessions |
| Strong weight capacity for a standard sofa |
Details:
-
Sale price shown: $1,549 (was $1,799)
-
Overall dimensions: 32" H × 84" W × 39.5" D
-
Seat: 18" H × 76.5" W × 32.3" D
-
Upholstery material: velvet; frame: kiln-dried hardwood; legs: metal
-
Cushion construction: feather blend; back fill includes foam, down, synthetic fiber, and feather
-
Foam density: 1.9 lbs./cu. ft. and over
-
Weight capacity: 900 lb; rub count 15,000–30,000
-
Removable cushion covers; cushions reversible
-
Fabric care: spot clean with dry, solvent-based cleaner; 30-day return policy
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.5 | Smooth setup; tools included |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.8 | Velvet and plush fill can hold warmth |
| Seat Comfort | 4.5 | The most lounge-friendly feel of the group |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Comfortable, but softer over long sessions |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.6 | Best for reclined lounging; less ideal for shorter legs |
| Durability | 4.0 | Solid capacity; moderate rub-count range |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.9 | Softer feel shifts more as you move |
| Cleaning | 3.9 | Spot-clean approach demands a bit more care |
| Value | 4.1 | Strong comfort value, priced above the simpler models |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | The pick for deep lounging, with a trade-off in structure and heat |
Moab 81'' Upholstered Sofa
Our Testing Experience:
The Moab started making sense as soon as we used it the way most people actually do: quick sits, snacks in hand, then a longer TV stretch. The lower seat height was the first thing I noticed. It puts you into a more relaxed posture right away, and it sits softer than the Miller without going fully cloud-like. Mia liked the texture because it felt less fussy against skin than velvet, and Jenna and Ethan said it worked well for shared lounging even though the seat compressed a bit more when someone kept shifting around.
What we liked
-
Textured upholstery that felt practical in everyday use
-
Comfort that landed between firm and plush
-
A relaxed seat height that suits lounging
Who it is best for
-
Casual TV rooms and everyday living spaces
-
Shoppers who want texture with lower-fuss upkeep
Where it falls short
-
Anyone who wants a higher seat for easier standing
-
People who prefer a crisp, very structured seat
Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Basketweave texture feels practical and forgiving | Lower seat height won’t suit everyone |
| Balanced comfort from springs + feather-blend cues | Not a “formal upright” sitter |
| Everyday care reads simple |
Details:
-
Sale price shown: $1,349 (was $1,599)
-
Overall dimensions: 29" H × 81" W × 36" D
-
Seat: 17.7" H × 76.5" W × 22" D
-
Upholstery: textured fabric option shown; frame: kiln-dried hardwood
-
Fill: foam + synthetic fiber; feather-blend cushion construction noted
-
Seat construction: web suspension + sinuous springs
-
Rub count: 15,000–30,000; fabric care: water-based detergent
-
CertiPUR-US® certification shown; assembly required
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.3 | Standard setup that goes faster with a second person |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.2 | Textured upholstery felt less heat-trapping in long use |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Comfortable “settle-in” feel without being too soft |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Relaxed posture support; less structured than the firmer models |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.1 | Middle-of-the-road depth works for most users |
| Durability | 4.0 | Moderate rub-count range; solid support system listed |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.1 | Easy enough to shift posture and refresh cushions |
| Cleaning | 4.2 | Everyday care feels manageable with the listed instructions |
| Value | 4.2 | A sensible value if you want texture and comfort balance |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | The practical textured pick, with a lower-seated lounge bias |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Geo 84" Upholstered Sofa | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Miller 84'' Upholstered Sofa | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| Rae 84'' Upholstered Sofa | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.9 |
| Moab 81'' Upholstered Sofa | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.1 |
Geo came out as the most balanced performer because it paired steady comfort with the strongest durability signals in the group. Rae was the clear lounge leader, with the deepest, softest sit, but it also ran warmer and felt less structured over long sessions. Miller stood out for upright everyday seating. Moab landed in the middle, with a textured, lower-slung feel that was easy to live with.
How to Choose the AllModern Sofa?
Start with seat depth and seat height. If you like to lounge, stretch out, or nap, the deeper option makes more sense. If you sit upright often or want an easier stand-up, the higher seat is the safer bet. After that, think about fabric honestly: velvet looks rich but usually asks for more upkeep, while textured weaves tend to feel easier to live with. For couples, stability matters more than it seems—some seats stay calmer when one person shifts. In our testing, Geo felt like the safest all-around pick, while Rae made the strongest case for deep lounging.
Limitations
The trade-offs were pretty consistent across the group. The sofas that felt best for sprawled-out lounging also ran warmer and felt less structured through the back. The more supportive options gave up some of that sink-in ease. Shorter users may want a pillow or ottoman with the deepest seat, while taller loungers may want more depth than the shallowest model provides. Velvet also showed wear patterns and pressure marks faster than textured fabrics in day-to-day use.
AllModern Sofa Vs. Alternatives
- Why choose these models: clean modern silhouettes, noticeable differences in seat depth and support, and a straightforward delivery-and-returns setup.
- Alternatives to consider: Burrow Range Sectional for modular flexibility and stain-resistant options, Lovesac Sactionals for maximum configuration and fabric choice, and Castlery Jonathan Chaise Sectional if you want a more sectional-first lounge layout.
Pro Tips for AllModern Sofa
-
Measure doorways first, then measure again with tight turns and stair landings in mind.
-
If you’re between two seat depths, choose based on posture: upright sitters want less depth; loungers want more.
-
For velvet, keep a soft brush handy and lightly groom high-contact zones weekly.
-
Use a throw or removable cover on the “primary seat” to reduce visible wear patterns.
-
Rotate and re-fluff back pillows on plush models to keep support consistent.
-
Add a small lumbar pillow if you feel your hips sliding forward on softer cushions.
-
Keep a low-profile side table nearby so you don’t rely on arms as drink ledges.
-
If you have pets, trim nails and use a throw where they jump up to reduce snag risk.
-
Put felt pads under legs early to prevent micro-shifts and floor scuffs during the first week.
-
In the first month, note pressure points (hips, shoulders, knees) and adjust with an ottoman or footrest rather than forcing the sofa to “break in” your posture.
FAQs
Is a deeper seat always better for comfort?
Not necessarily. Deep seats are great for lounging, but if you sit upright for work or conversation, too much depth can make you scoot forward to find support.
Which option felt best for lower-back sensitivity during long TV nights?
In our testing, Geo felt the steadiest through the hips and lower back during long TV sessions. It stayed supportive without forcing a very upright posture.
What’s the most practical upholstery choice for everyday living?
The textured upholstery options were easier to live with day to day. Velvet looked richer, but it showed marks faster and needed more touch-up.
How do I pick if I’m petite or have shorter legs?
Check how your feet land and where the back cushion meets you. If your feet don’t plant comfortably, choose the shallower option or plan on using a pillow and ottoman.
