Zeno Mattress is a custom mattress maker focused on made-to-order builds for non-standard spaces, including home, RV, and marine layouts. We tested four core builds for support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability, and found clear trade-offs: foam-forward options excel at motion control and contouring, while latex and innerspring builds feel more buoyant and stable for bigger bodies and couples.
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zeno Pure The Ultra | 3.8/5.0 | Plush pressure relief; quiet surface | Softer edges; warmer feel for hot sleepers | Side-sleep starts, guest bunks, lighter-to-average bodies | Custom quote |
| Zeno Latex Mattress | 4.2/5.0 | Fast response; cooler airflow feel | More bounce; less “hug” | Combination sleepers, hot sleepers, frequent position-changers | Custom quote |
| Zeno Pure Ultra Memory Foam | 3.9/5.0 | Best motion isolation; deep contour | Slower to move on; heat buildup | Couples sensitive to movement, back sleepers who like contour | Custom quote |
| Zeno-Pedic Innerspring | 4.2/5.0 | Strong support; sturdy perimeter | More partner disturbance | Heavier bodies, edge sitters, sleepers who prefer lift | Custom quote |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the lineup, we felt the brand’s “custom-first” mindset most in edge and layout flexibility, not in a one-size-fits-all showroom feel. Marcus (6'1", ~230 lbs) consistently favored the latex and innerspring builds for keeping his hips level. Jenna and Ethan (shared-bed testing) preferred memory foam for movement control, but both noticed the trade-off in ease of turning. I landed in the middle: latex for all-around balance, The Ultra for plush pressure relief when my lower back felt tight.
Zeno Mattress Comparison Chart
| Feature | Zeno Pure The Ultra | Zeno Latex Mattress | Zeno Pure Ultra Memory Foam | Zeno-Pedic Innerspring |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Build type | High-density foam with pillow-top style feel | Latex rubber mattress | Memory foam over high-density foam | Innerspring mattress |
| Published material description | Urethane (high-density) foam | All natural latex rubber | Visco memory foam + high-density foam | Innerspring construction |
| Typical use fit | Custom bunks, odd dimensions | Custom home/marine shapes | Custom home/marine shapes | Custom home/marine shapes |
| Thickness (published) | Any thickness available | - | 3 in memory foam over 5 in high-density foam | Starts at 7 in thick and up |
| Hinge/fold option | Available | Available | Available | Available |
| Tested firmness feel | Soft | Medium to medium-firm | Medium (slow-melting contour) | Medium (lifted, springy) |
| Support (team impression) | Moderate | Strong | Moderate-strong | Strong |
| Pressure relief | High | Medium-high | High | Medium |
| Cooling | Medium | Medium-high | Medium-low | High |
| Motion isolation | High | Medium | Very high | Medium-low |
| Responsiveness | Medium | Very high | Low | High |
| Edge support | Medium-low | Medium-high | Medium | High |
| Durability outlook | Medium | High | Medium | Medium-high |
How We Tested It
We rotated these four builds through the same daily routine: full-night sleep, evening reading with pillows stacked upright, and short “reset tests” after getting out of bed and returning. Support was judged by hip and lumbar alignment checks; cooling by heat buildup after 30–45 minutes and at 3 a.m.; pressure relief by shoulder/hip comfort during long side and back holds. Motion isolation came from partner entry/exit and mid-sleep shifting, responsiveness from turn effort, edge support from sitting and edge-lying, and durability from multi-week feel consistency.
Zeno Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Zeno Pure The Ultra
Our Testing Experience
The first night on The Ultra felt like I sank in just enough to unclench my lower back after a long desk day. It’s the kind of surface that makes you exhale when your shoulder finally stops “hovering.” Marcus didn’t hate it, but he called out that his hips wanted a firmer pushback once he rolled toward stomach-sleep. Jenna and Ethan liked how quiet it stayed when one of them shifted, but they both noticed the perimeter compressing when they sat to lace shoes. By week two, the comfort stayed consistent, but the heat pattern was predictable: cozy early, slightly warm by morning if you don’t run a cooler room.
What we liked
-
Plush, easy pressure relief for side and back sleep
-
Excellent “quiet” feel when a partner moves
-
Comfortable for reading propped up without feeling poked by the surface
Who it is best for
-
Sleepers who prefer a softer, more cushioned surface
-
Couples who prioritize a calmer surface at night
-
Guest rooms and bunks where comfort matters more than bounce
Where it falls short
-
Heavier bodies may want more lift under hips
-
Edge sitting feels less steady than latex or innerspring
-
Hot sleepers may feel heat buildup overnight
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Plush pressure relief | Softer edge support |
| Strong motion isolation | Warmth can build overnight |
| Calm, quiet surface feel | Less lift for heavier stomach sleepers |
Details
-
Price: Custom quote
-
Tested firmness feel: Soft
-
Build type: High-density urethane foam; Ultra Foam is positioned as the softest option (pillow-top version)
-
Thickness: Any thickness available
-
Available sizes/shapes: Custom sizes and shapes
-
Hinge/fold option: Available
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.8 | Comfortable for back/side, but less lift under heavier hips |
| Cooling | 3.6 | Noticeable warmth by morning in a neutral room |
| Pressure Relief | 4.5 | Shoulder and hip comfort stood out immediately |
| Motion Isolation | 4.3 | Partner movement stayed muted and localized |
| Responsiveness | 3.5 | Turning took a bit more effort than latex/innerspring |
| Edge Support | 3.4 | Sitting and edge-lying felt compressible |
| Durability | 3.7 | Feel held steady across weeks, but foam compression is the long-game risk |
| Overall Score | 3.8 | Strong comfort and motion control with edge and heat trade-offs |
Zeno Latex Mattress
Our Testing Experience
Latex was the “move without thinking about it” mattress for our room. I could roll from side to back and it responded like a springy platform rather than a slow-melting cradle. Marcus immediately liked how it kept his hips from dipping when he drifted forward into stomach-sleep. Jenna and Ethan had a split reaction: they loved how easy it was to reposition, but the bounce made partner movement more noticeable than on memory foam. For me, latex was the most consistent across the night; I didn’t get that late-morning “softening” sensation, and the surface stayed lively when I sat up to work on a laptop.
What we liked
-
Fast rebound that makes turning easy
-
Supportive “lift” feel that keeps hips level
-
Cooler surface sensation compared with denser foams
Who it is best for
-
Combination sleepers who change positions frequently
-
Hot sleepers who hate heat-trapping foam feel
-
Heavier bodies needing steadier hip support
Where it falls short
-
Light sleepers may notice more partner movement than on memory foam
-
People who want a deep hug may find it too buoyant
-
Motion isolation is good, not exceptional
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very responsive and easy to turn | More bounce than foam-only builds |
| Supportive for hips and midsection | Less “hug” for people who want deep contour |
| Cooler surface feel | Partner movement is easier to detect |
Details
-
Price: Custom quote
-
Tested firmness feel: Medium to medium-firm
-
Build type: Latex rubber mattress (all natural latex rubber)
-
Available sizes/shapes: Custom sizes and shapes
-
Hinge/fold option: Available
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4 | Kept hips level for me and Marcus across positions |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Less heat buildup than foam-heavy options |
| Pressure Relief | 4.0 | Comfortable, but not as plush as The Ultra or memory foam |
| Motion Isolation | 3.7 | Movement was controlled, but bounce is present |
| Responsiveness | 4.6 | Turning felt effortless and quick |
| Edge Support | 4.0 | More stable perimeter than soft foam builds |
| Durability | 4.5 | Latex feel stayed consistent through repeated use |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | The best balance of support, ease-of-movement, and temperature comfort |
Zeno Pure Ultra Memory Foam
Our Testing Experience
Memory foam was the clear “couple-friendly” pick in our room—Jenna could fall asleep while Ethan did his usual midnight shifting, and she didn’t get jostled. When I laid flat on my back, the surface filled in behind my lumbar curve in a way that felt deliberate, almost like it was smoothing out small gaps. The trade-off showed up the moment Ethan tried to rotate quickly: he called it “a little sticky,” and the effort to turn was real. Marcus liked the alignment at first, but after longer stomach-sleep stretches he wanted more pushback under his hips. Cooling was the weakest point for our group: comfortable early, then warmer if you’re prone to heat.
What we liked
-
Best motion isolation of the four
-
Strong contouring for back comfort
-
Quiet surface for light sleepers sharing a bed
Who it is best for
-
Couples sensitive to movement
-
Back sleepers who want a deeper contour
-
Sleepers who like a calm, “hugging” feel
Where it falls short
-
Turning can feel slow or effortful
-
Hot sleepers may notice heat buildup
-
Edge support is only moderate for frequent sitters
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent motion isolation | Slower response when turning |
| Deep contouring comfort | Warmer overnight feel for hot sleepers |
| Quiet, stable surface | Edge sitting feels only moderately steady |
Details
-
Price: Custom quote
-
Tested firmness feel: Medium (slow contour)
-
Build type: High-density foam + memory foam (Visco)
-
Thickness (published standard): 3 in memory foam over 5 in high-density foam
-
Custom alterations: Available
-
Available sizes/shapes: Custom sizes and shapes
-
Hinge/fold option: Available
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.1 | Strong contour with decent base support; heavier stomach sleep wanted more lift |
| Cooling | 3.4 | Heat buildup was the most noticeable in the lineup |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3 | Excellent contouring for shoulders, hips, and lower back |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | Partner movement stayed highly localized |
| Responsiveness | 3.2 | Turning and quick repositioning took effort |
| Edge Support | 3.5 | Fine for edge-lying, less for prolonged sitting |
| Durability | 3.9 | Held up through our cycle, with medium-term foam softening the main watchout |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | A motion-control standout that trades away cooling and agility |
Zeno-Pedic Innerspring
Our Testing Experience
Innerspring was the “lifted” option—when I sat down, the mattress met me instead of collapsing under me. Marcus immediately called it out as the most stable under his hips; he never got that hammock feeling. Cooling was also a strength, especially compared with the foam-heavy builds. Where it got tricky was the couple test: Jenna could feel Ethan getting in and out more clearly than on memory foam, and the bounce made nighttime shifting more obvious. Still, the perimeter was the best in our set. Sitting to tie shoes felt steady, and edge-lying didn’t produce that slow slide toward the floor.
What we liked
-
Strong support, especially under hips and midsection
-
Best edge stability for sitting and edge-lying
-
Cooler feel with less overnight heat retention
Who it is best for
-
Heavier bodies needing dependable support
-
Sleepers who like a buoyant, traditional feel
-
People who frequently sit on the edge
Where it falls short
-
Light sleepers may notice more partner disturbance
-
Less contouring than foam-forward builds
-
Bounce can be a negative for motion-sensitive couples
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong hip and lumbar support | More motion transfer than memory foam |
| Excellent edge support | Less “hug” contouring |
| Cooler overnight feel | Bounce is noticeable for light sleepers |
Details
-
Price: Custom quote
-
Tested firmness feel: Medium (supportive, lifted)
-
Build type: Innerspring mattress
-
Thickness (published): Starts at 7 in thick and up
-
Firmness options (published): Orthopedic (firmest), Pillow soft (medium), Ultra Innerspring (pillow-top version)
-
Available sizes/shapes: Custom sizes and shapes
-
Hinge/fold option: Available
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.5 | Most consistently supportive for heavier bodies and mixed positions |
| Cooling | 4.3 | Strong airflow feel with less heat buildup |
| Pressure Relief | 3.8 | Comfortable, but less contouring than foam-heavy builds |
| Motion Isolation | 3.4 | Partner movement was more detectable |
| Responsiveness | 4.4 | Easy turning and quick recovery |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | The strongest perimeter in sitting and edge-lying |
| Durability | 4.2 | Held structure well through our use cycle |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | A stability-first pick with motion transfer as the clear compromise |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness | Edge Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zeno Pure The Ultra | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.4 |
| Zeno Latex Mattress | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.0 |
| Zeno Pure Ultra Memory Foam | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 3.2 | 3.5 |
| Zeno-Pedic Innerspring | 4.2 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.5 |
The numbers tell a clean story. Latex and innerspring are the most even performers across categories, with latex taking the lead in responsiveness and durability, while innerspring wins on edge support. Memory foam is the specialist: best-in-class motion isolation with a clear weakness in cooling and quick movement. The Ultra is the comfort play—pressure relief and quietness first, with edges and heat as the trade-offs.
How to Choose the Zeno Mattress?
If you turn a lot at night, prioritize latex or innerspring for the easiest repositioning. If partner motion is your main complaint, memory foam is the safest bet. For softer cushioning and side-sleep starts, The Ultra is the plush option. Heavier sleepers or anyone sensitive to hip dip should lean innerspring (or latex if you want less bounce than coils). For hot sleepers, latex and innerspring stayed cooler in our room.
Limitations
These mattresses are built around customization, so “one consistent showroom spec” is not the point—and it shows in how variable feel can be across builds. The Ultra and memory foam options can trap more heat and feel slower to turn on. Innerspring and latex improve lift and perimeter stability, but they can broadcast movement more than foam-forward designs, which matters for light sleepers sharing a bed.
Zeno Mattress Vs. Alternatives
Why choose these models
- You need a mattress made to a non-standard shape or tight layout, including hinged configurations
- You want choices across foam, latex rubber, memory foam, and innerspring constructions
- You care more about fit and build approach than retail-style model variety
Alternatives to consider
- Mattress Insider (made-to-order specialty mattresses for RVs, boats, and odd sizes)
- FoamOrder (custom latex/memory/high-density foam mattresses cut to your dimensions)
- BoatBeds by Handcraft Mattress Company (custom mattresses designed to fit boat berths)
Pro Tips for Zeno Mattress
-
Measure twice, then re-measure at the tightest point; custom builds punish small measurement errors.
-
If you sit on the edge daily, steer toward innerspring or latex for a steadier perimeter.
-
For hot sleepers, start with latex or innerspring before choosing foam-heavy builds.
-
If you share a bed and wake easily, prioritize the memory foam build for movement control.
-
If you rotate positions often, avoid slow-response feels and prioritize latex or innerspring.
-
For side-sleep starts, consider softer comfort feels like The Ultra to reduce shoulder pressure.
-
If the bed needs access panels underneath, plan hinge placement around how you actually lift and store gear.
-
Use a stable, well-matched base; a soft platform can exaggerate sag and blur support differences.
-
Give yourself a consistent pillow setup during evaluation; pillow height can mimic mattress “support problems.”
FAQs
Q: Which Zeno build is best for couples?
A: The memory foam build muted partner entry/exit best, with the least night-to-night disturbance.
Q: Which option is easiest to turn on?
A: Latex felt the most effortless for repositioning, with innerspring close behind.
Q: Which one sleeps coolest?
A: Innerspring and latex stayed cooler through the night compared with foam-forward builds.
Q: What if I sit on the edge a lot?
A: Innerspring had the most stable edge for sitting and edge-lying.
