Sears sells mattresses from familiar national brands, but its inventory can change by seller, size, and ZIP code. This review focuses on four Serta and Beautyrest coil and hybrid models that cover a useful range of feels, from plush and forgiving to steady and supportive. I compared them for support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability so you can quickly see which one fits your sleep style. Before buying, confirm the exact model name, comfort level, seller, delivery terms, and return policy on the listing available in your area.
Table of Contents
- Which Sears mattresses did we test?
- Which Sears mattress should you choose?
- How do these Sears mattresses compare?
- How did we test these mattresses?
- Sears Mattress: Our Testing Experience
- How did each mattress score?
- How do you choose the right Sears mattress?
- Where these mattresses fall short
- Sears mattresses vs. common alternatives
- What should you check before buying?
- FAQs
Which Sears mattresses did we test?
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serta Dazzling Night 12" Hybrid | 4.2 | Balanced feel; zoned support; steady temperature | Light bounce noise; not the most isolating | Most sleep positions; back/side combos |
| Serta Adoring Night 10.5" Plush | 3.8 | Easy pressure relief; quick to move on | Softer edges; lighter motion control | Lighter-to-average sleepers; guest rooms |
| Serta Blue Lagoon Nights 13.5" Medium | 3.9 | Solid mid-back support; stable surface | Less “hug” than hybrids; average cooling | Back sleepers; combo sleepers wanting stability |
| Beautyrest BRS900 12" Medium | 4.1 | Strong core support; reliable temperature management | Firmer shoulder feel for some side sleepers | Back/side sleepers wanting a steadier coil feel |
Which Sears mattress should you choose?
Serta Dazzling Night is the best all-around choice. Its medium hybrid surface cushioned the shoulders and hips without letting the midsection sink too far, and it was the easiest model to recommend for couples with different sleep positions.
Beautyrest BRS900 is the better pick if you want a firmer, more structured coil feel. It held up well near the perimeter and managed heat almost as well as Dazzling Night, though lightweight side sleepers may want more shoulder cushioning.
Serta Blue Lagoon Nights works best for back and combination sleepers who prefer a flatter, traditional innerspring surface. It felt stable from the center toward the edge, but it offered less contouring than Dazzling Night.
Serta Adoring Night has the softest first touch and is the most comfortable option here for lightweight side sleepers. Its weaker edge and greater motion transfer make it a better fit for a guest room or a solo sleeper than for a couple sharing a smaller bed.
How do these Sears mattresses compare?
| Feature | Serta Dazzling Night Hybrid | Serta Adoring Night Plush | Serta Blue Lagoon Nights Medium | Beautyrest BRS900 Medium |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hybrid | Coil (tight top) | Coil (tight top) | Pocketed coil |
| Profile height | 12" | 10.5" | 13.5" | 12" |
| Notable support feature | 850-density, three-zone coil system | 825-density coil system; gel band | 825-density coil system; lumbar gel band | 900 Series pocketed coils + lumbar gel memory foam |
| Cooling components | CoolFeel cover; gel memory foam | Quilted cover; gel band support | Cool Twist gel memory foam | DualCool technology |
| Our firmness impression | Medium | Medium-to-plush | Medium | Medium |
| Motion feel | Moderately isolated for a hybrid | More movement detectable | Moderate movement | Moderate movement |
| Edge feel | More stable overall | Softer edge compression | Stable enough for most | Stable, consistent coil perimeter |
| Best fit | Mixed sleepers needing balanced support | Lighter sleepers wanting a softer start | Back/combo sleepers wanting steadiness | Back/side sleepers wanting a firmer, cleaner coil response |
How did we test these mattresses?
Each mattress spent at least 14 nights on the same rigid foundation before scoring. Our test routine combined back and side sleeping with repeatable measurements: a 44-pound load for surface sink, a 30-minute surface-temperature check, three motion-transfer trials, and identical center-versus-edge compression tests. I handled most of the combination-sleeping checks at 175 pounds. Marcus, at 215 pounds, focused on heat buildup and edge stability; Carlos, at 185 pounds, tracked spinal alignment and core support; and Mia, at 130 pounds, checked shoulder and hip pressure relief. We also timed surface recovery after turns and measured how long vibration remained noticeable after a partner got up.
Sears Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Serta Dazzling Night Hybrid

Our Testing Experience
Dazzling Night felt balanced from the first night. I rated its firmness at 5.8 out of 10: my hips settled enough to relax my lower back, but the three-zone coil system kept my midsection level when I rolled from back to side. A 44-pound load sank 1.3 inches at the center, and the surface recovered 90% of that height in 1.1 seconds after the weight was removed, so changing positions never felt slow. Marcus recorded a 5.1°F surface-temperature rise after 30 minutes, the smallest increase among the three Serta models, and the bed returned close to its starting temperature within 10 minutes. In our motion trials, vibration faded in about 1.0 second. The coils were still noticeable, but the movement was subdued enough for most couples. Edge compression stayed close to the center measurement, which matched Carlos’s impression that the support core took over smoothly instead of letting the middle or perimeter collapse.
What we liked
-
Steady midsection support for back sleeping and casual lounging
-
Pressure relief without a deep, stuck-in-foam sink
-
Quick, predictable response for frequent position changes
Who it is best for
-
Combo sleepers who alternate between back and side
-
People who want lumbar steadiness without going extra-firm
-
Hot sleepers who still like a bit of foam contouring
Where it falls short
-
Motion isolation is solid for a hybrid, but not foam-quiet
-
Petite side sleepers may prefer a softer comfort layer at the shoulder
-
If you want a dead-quiet feel, the coils can seem slightly lively during turns

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Balanced medium feel for most sleep positions | Not the most motion-dampening option in the group |
| Zoned coil support helps keep hips aligned | May feel a touch firm for very light side sleepers |
| Cool-to-the-touch cover with gel foams for steadier temperature | Coil response can feel lively if you prefer an all-foam style |

Details
-
Type: Hybrid
-
Profile: 12"
-
Comfort feel: Medium
-
Support system: 850-density, three-zone pocketed-coil design
-
Comfort materials: Cool Twist gel memory foam
-
Cooling: CoolFeel cover; gel-infused foams
-
Warranty: 10-year limited warranty

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4 | Zoned coil feel kept hips from dipping, especially on back sleep |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Stayed steady for Marcus; less heat pooling than the tighter-tops |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3 | Enough give at shoulders/hips without “bottoming out” |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Noticeable improvement over basic coils, but movement still travels some |
| Responsiveness | 4.3 | Easy, quick turns; no “stuck” foam sensation |
| Edge Support | 4.2 | Stable for sitting and getting up; mild compression at the very edge |
| Durability | 4.1 | Coil core felt resilient; comfort layers held shape over repeated weeks |
| Overall | 4.2 | Best blend of balance, support, and day-to-day usability |
Serta Adoring Night Plush

Our Testing Experience
Adoring Night was the softest bed in the group, landing at 4.5 out of 10 on our firmness scale. Mia’s shoulder settled comfortably during side sleeping, and the 44-pound load sank 1.7 inches—0.4 inch deeper than on Dazzling Night. The surface rebounded quickly in 1.0 second, so the plush feel did not make turning difficult. The trade-offs appeared at the perimeter and across the bed: edge compression reached 3.2 inches under the same seated load that compressed the center 2.4 inches, and motion remained noticeable for about 1.5 seconds after each disturbance. Marcus also measured a 7.0°F temperature rise after 30 minutes. Support felt secure while we stayed centered, but the softer edge and warmer surface make this a better match for a lightweight solo sleeper or guest room than for heavier partners sharing the full width.
What we liked
-
Soft, welcoming feel the moment you lie down
-
Easy to turn and reposition without laggy foam
-
Gentle cushioning for lighter side sleepers at the shoulder and hip
Who it is best for
-
Lightweight to average-weight sleepers who want a plush-leaning start
-
Guest rooms where easy comfort matters more than edge strength
-
People who dislike the slow, sticky feel of dense memory foam
Where it falls short
-
Softest edge support in the group
-
Heavier sleepers may want a firmer, more resistant core
-
More motion carries across the surface than on the hybrid

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Soft, inviting surface feel | Edge compresses more when sitting or getting up |
| Pressure relief felt friendlier at the shoulder | More motion transfer than the hybrid |
| Coil support keeps it from feeling overly mushy | Not the most confidence-inspiring choice for heavier bodies |

Details
-
Type: Tight-top coil mattress
-
Profile: 10.5"
-
Comfort feel: Plush (tight-top design)
-
Support system: 8" pocketed-coil core with an 825-density system label
-
Comfort materials: PillowSoft Aire and PillowSoft foam layers
-
Support feature: Gel band support
-
Sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, California King
-
Warranty: 10-year warranty

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.9 | Supportive enough centered, but less “locked in” at the hips than the best two |
| Cooling | 3.8 | Fine for average sleepers; Marcus still felt warmer than on the hybrid |
| Pressure Relief | 4.0 | Softer start helped Mia’s shoulder comfort |
| Motion Isolation | 3.6 | More movement traveled across the surface during repositioning |
| Responsiveness | 3.9 | Easy to turn; comfort layers didn’t feel sticky |
| Edge Support | 3.8 | Softest edge in the group, especially for Marcus’ sit tests |
| Durability | 3.7 | Thinner build felt more sensitive to long-term compression in heavy use |
| Overall | 3.8 | Comfortable entry feel, with trade-offs at the edges and in motion control |
Serta Blue Lagoon Nights Medium

Our Testing Experience
Blue Lagoon Nights had the flattest, most traditional innerspring feel. It registered 6.2 out of 10 for firmness, and the 44-pound load sank 1.1 inches, which explains why Carlos felt his mid-back stay level instead of dipping after he relaxed. The lumbar gel band added a mild lift rather than a hard ridge. Mia could side-sleep on it, but the tighter surface left more pressure at her shoulder than Dazzling Night. A 6.3°F temperature rise after 30 minutes put cooling in the middle of the group, while motion remained detectable for roughly 1.4 seconds after each trial. At the edge, compression measured 2.4 inches—far steadier than Adoring Night and secure enough for sitting or sleeping near the side. This is the clear pick for back sleepers who favor an even surface over a deep foam contour.
What we liked
-
Level, steady support that works well for back sleeping
-
Consistent feel across the surface with easy movement
-
More dependable edge sitting than the softer tight-top
Who it is best for
-
Back sleepers and combo sleepers who prefer a flatter feel
-
People who like a traditional coil response over a deep foam hug
-
Sleepers who want steadiness more than plush contouring
Where it falls short
-
Side sleepers who need deep shoulder contouring may prefer a hybrid
-
Motion isolation stays average for a coil-forward build
-
Cooling is adequate, but not a standout for hot sleepers

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Steady support that helps maintain spinal alignment | Less contouring than a hybrid for side sleepers |
| Lumbar support band built into the design | Motion isolation remains average for coils |
| Familiar coil feel with easy repositioning | Cooling is fine, but not a cold-surface feel |

Details
-
Type: Tight-top coil mattress
-
Profile: 13.5"
-
Comfort feel: Medium
-
Support system: 825-density pocketed-coil system
-
Support feature: Lumbar gel support band
-
Comfort materials: Cool Twist gel memory foam
-
Sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, California King

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.1 | Stable, level feel that kept my lumbar area supported overnight |
| Cooling | 3.9 | Reasonable airflow; Marcus still preferred the best cooling layers elsewhere |
| Pressure Relief | 4.1 | Good overall, but less shoulder “give” than the hybrid |
| Motion Isolation | 3.7 | Partner movement more noticeable than on the hybrid |
| Responsiveness | 3.9 | Easy turns and a familiar coil rebound |
| Edge Support | 4.0 | Reliable for sitting and getting up; less dip at the perimeter |
| Durability | 3.9 | Solid coil feel; comfort layers stayed consistent through the rotation |
| Overall | 3.9 | A stable, traditional option that prioritizes level support over deep contouring |
Beautyrest BRS900 Medium

Our Testing Experience
The BRS900 felt firmer and more structured than either Serta tight-top. We measured it at 6.4 out of 10 for firmness, with 1.0 inch of sink under the 44-pound load. On my back, that restrained give kept my hips level without making the surface feel rigid. The foam returned to 90% of its starting height in 0.9 second, and motion settled in about 1.2 seconds—controlled for an innerspring, though not as quiet as dense foam. Marcus recorded a 5.4°F temperature rise after 30 minutes and preferred its fresher cover to the warmer Serta tight-tops. Edge compression measured 2.1 inches, so the perimeter stayed dependable when I moved outward to read. Mia’s only consistent complaint was shoulder pressure during longer side-sleeping stretches. This older Beautyrest Silver model remains available through some retailers, but local stock can vary.
What we liked
-
Strong core support with a steady, stable feel
-
More consistent temperature feel through the night
-
Good edge confidence for daily in-and-out use
Who it is best for
-
Back sleepers and combo sleepers who want steady support
-
People who prefer a cleaner, less plush surface
-
Hot sleepers who still like a classic coil feel
Where it falls short
-
Some side sleepers may want a softer top at the shoulder
-
Motion isolation is controlled, but not foam-level quiet
-
If you want a deep hug, a thicker hybrid will feel plusher

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Pocketed coil system feels stable and supportive | Can feel a bit firm at the shoulder for lighter side sleepers |
| Cooling cover and foams help manage heat and moisture | Motion isolation is moderate, not exceptional |
| Lumbar gel memory foam support layer | Not the best match for people seeking deep contouring |

Details
-
Type: Pocketed coil mattress
-
Profile: 12"
-
Comfort type: Medium
-
Cooling: DualCool technology
-
Comfort layers: Gel memory foam lumbar support and other foams
-
Support system: 900 Series pocketed coil technology
-
Warranty: 10-year warranty

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.3 | Consistent hip and lumbar support without feeling harsh |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Marcus reported less heat buildup and a fresher surface feel |
| Pressure Relief | 4.1 | Good balance, though lighter side sleepers may want more plushness |
| Motion Isolation | 3.8 | Noticeable movement compared with foam, but controlled for coils |
| Responsiveness | 4.0 | Easy turns; stable surface when repositioning |
| Edge Support | 4.1 | Reliable for sitting and edge-near sleeping |
| Durability | 4.2 | Resilient coil feel; comfort layers stayed consistent through rotation |
| Overall | 4.1 | A steady, supportive coil option with dependable temperature behavior |
How did each mattress score?
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serta Perfect Sleeper Dazzling Night 12" Hybrid Medium | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.3 |
| Serta Perfect Sleeper Adoring Night 10.5" Plush Tight Top | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.7 | 3.9 |
| Serta Perfect Sleeper Blue Lagoon Nights 13.5" Medium Tight Top | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
| Beautyrest Silver BRS900 Medium 12" | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Dazzling Night earns the highest overall score because it combines the strongest pressure relief with easy movement and reliable midsection support. BRS900 follows closely and is the sturdier choice at the edge, although its firmer shoulder feel narrows the audience. Blue Lagoon Nights prioritizes level back support over contouring, while Adoring Night trades edge stability and motion control for the softest initial feel. The scores use the same 5-point scale throughout and reflect the tested samples rather than every comfort option sold under these model families.
How do you choose the right Sears mattress?
Start with your sleep position, body weight, and sensitivity at the shoulders and hips. Then decide whether you want the deeper contouring of a hybrid or the flatter response of a traditional innerspring. Finally, check edge stability and motion transfer if you share the bed or use the full surface.
-
Choose Dazzling Night if you want the most balanced feel for mixed sleeping positions.
-
Pick BRS900 if you prefer a steadier coil feel with reliable temperature control.
-
Go with Blue Lagoon Nights if you’re mostly a back sleeper and want a flatter, more traditional surface.
-
Consider Adoring Night if you’re lightweight and want the softest first contact—just expect the weakest edge support.
Where these mattresses fall short
None of these beds isolates movement as completely as a dense all-foam mattress, and only Dazzling Night provides a pronounced foam contour. Adoring Night has the weakest perimeter and is the least convincing option for heavier sleepers. Blue Lagoon Nights can press too firmly against a side sleeper’s shoulder, while the BRS900 may feel similarly firm to lightweight sleepers with sharp pressure points. Inventory is another limitation: model names, comfort options, sellers, and return terms can differ across Sears listings, so confirm every detail before ordering.
Sears mattresses vs. common alternatives
These Serta and Beautyrest models make sense if you want familiar, coil-supported comfort, an easy-to-move-on surface, and the option to compare conventional retail listings. They are less appealing if you want a long at-home trial, deep all-foam motion control, or a single direct-to-consumer seller.
DreamCloud Classic Hybrid is the closest value alternative. Its 12-inch hybrid design has a thicker quilted feel than the Serta tight-tops, so it suits shoppers who want more cushioning without giving up coil support. It also comes with direct-to-consumer trial and warranty terms instead of seller-specific marketplace policies.
Helix Midnight is the stronger alternative for side sleepers. Its medium hybrid construction concentrates more cushioning at the shoulders and hips than Blue Lagoon Nights or the BRS900, while still responding quickly enough for combination sleeping. It usually sits above the lowest-priced Serta options but competes directly with many Dazzling Night listings.
Saatva Classic is a premium upgrade rather than a same-price substitute. It offers three comfort levels, two heights, stronger perimeter reinforcement, and in-room delivery. Choose it when edge support and a polished, buoyant innerspring feel matter more than keeping the initial price close to the Sears-listed models.
What should you check before buying?
-
Check the seller, exact model suffix, height, and comfort level before ordering; similar names can refer to different builds.
-
If you sleep hot, use breathable sheets and a thin protector so cooling layers can do their job.
-
For hybrids and coils, use a stable foundation; a flexy base can exaggerate softness and motion.
-
If you sit on the edge every day to dress or read, prioritize Dazzling Night, Blue Lagoon Nights, or the BRS900 over Adoring Night.
-
Side sleepers with shoulder pressure should pair a medium mattress with a pillow that keeps the neck level.
-
Rotate the mattress on a consistent schedule if the model allows it to help keep wear even.
-
Read the exact listing’s delivery, return, pickup-fee, and warranty terms; marketplace policies can differ from Sears-sold items.
-
Couples should pay attention to motion during normal routines (getting up, turning, sitting) before committing to a coil-forward feel.
-
If your lower back feels tight, prioritize steadier midsection support first, then fine-tune softness with bedding.
FAQs
Which model felt most balanced overall?
Dazzling Night felt the most balanced. It kept the hips level, cushioned the shoulders better than the coil-only models, and recovered quickly during position changes.
Which one is best if I sleep hot?
Dazzling Night and the BRS900 managed heat best in this group. Dazzling Night posted the smallest 30-minute temperature rise, while the BRS900’s cover also felt fresh at bedtime.
Which is most comfortable for lightweight side sleepers?
Adoring Night is the best fit for a lightweight side sleeper who values a soft first touch. Its deeper surface sink reduced shoulder pressure more effectively than Blue Lagoon Nights or the BRS900.
Which should heavier sleepers avoid?
Adoring Night is the weakest match for heavier sleepers because it had the deepest edge compression and the least stable full-width support. Dazzling Night or the BRS900 provides a firmer, more dependable base.