Your cart

Your cart is empty

We receive free products to review and participate in affiliate programs, where we are compensated for items purchased through links from our site. See our disclosure page for more information.

Schewels Mattress Reviews (2026)

Schewels’ mattress selection leans practical: mainstream builds, familiar feels, and options that target spinal support and temperature management more than flashy extras. We tested four popular Serta models to map real-world comfort—support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability—and to clarify who will love them and who should keep shopping.

Product Overview

Mattress Overall Score Pros Cons Ideal For
iComfort Aspire 14" Memory Foam Plush 4.3 Deep pressure relief; quiet surface; strong zoning feel Softer feel can reduce “on-top” stability Side sleepers; pressure-sensitive shoulders/hips
iComfort Aveda 12" Memory Foam Medium 4.2 Balanced support; noticeably cooler cover feel; stable foam transition Less bounce than hybrid; edge is only average Mixed-position sleepers who want medium foam
iComfort Iona 13" Memory Foam Medium 4.1 Even alignment; forgiving top; solid motion isolation Slightly less edge confidence; slower rebound Back and combo sleepers seeking calm foam support
Perfect Sleeper Dazzling Night 12" Hybrid Medium 4.4 Best overall balance; easier turning; strongest edges of the group More motion than all-foam; coil feel is noticeable Couples; combo sleepers; people who dislike “stuck” foam

Testing Team Takeaways

Across the week-to-week sleep logs, the hybrid felt the most versatile for mixed sleepers and couples, while the plush all-foam delivered the best pressure relief for side sleeping. The two medium all-foam options split the difference: one felt slightly firmer and tidier through the hips, the other felt a touch more forgiving at the surface. Heat management favored the iComfort builds overall, but the hybrid breathed better during repeated position changes.

Schewels Mattress Comparison Chart

Model Type Profile Feel Support Design Cooling Elements Motion Isolation Responsiveness Edge Support Best For
iComfort Aspire 14" Memory Foam Plush All-foam 14" Plush Zoned support (multi-zone) Cool-to-touch cover; heat-managing foams Excellent Medium-low Fair Side sleepers; pressure relief
iComfort Aveda 12" Memory Foam Medium All-foam 12" Medium Zoned support (multi-zone) Cool-to-touch cover; graphite/heat-managing foam Excellent Medium-low Fair Balanced foam feel; combo sleepers
iComfort Iona 13" Memory Foam Medium All-foam 13" Medium Zoned support (multi-zone) Cool-to-touch cover; graphite/heat-managing foam Excellent Medium Fair Back/combo sleepers wanting calm stability
Perfect Sleeper Dazzling Night 12" Hybrid Medium Hybrid 12" Medium 3-zoned coil design Gel memory foam + cooling fabric cues Good Medium-high Good Couples; easy turning; edge use

How We Tested It

We rotated nightly sleep trials across back, side, and mixed-position routines, then repeated the same checks in morning “edge sitting,” mid-day lounging, and partner disturbance scenarios. Our scoring tracked Support, Cooling, Pressure Relief, Motion Isolation, Responsiveness, Edge Support, and Durability using consistent touchpoints (heat buildup after sustained contact, alignment under hips/low back, ease of turning, and edge compression under seated load). Dr. Adrian Walker reviewed our notes for alignment logic and common pain-pattern red flags.

Schewels Mattress: Our Testing Experience

iComfort Aspire 14" Memory Foam Plush

Our Testing Experience

The first night felt instantly “quiet”—no springiness, just a slow, steady settle. When I rolled to my side, my shoulder sank without that sharp pressure spike, and my hips stayed level enough that my lower back didn’t feel tugged by morning. Marcus noticed the surface warming under his torso after a longer stretch of stillness, but he also said the zoning kept his hips from dropping into a hammock. Jenna and Ethan agreed it muted movement well, yet Ethan kept describing the turns as “a two-step”—sink, then push out.

What we liked

  • Excellent pressure relief for side sleeping, especially at shoulders and outer hips

  • Very low motion transfer during partner movement

  • Zoned feel helped keep hips from drifting out of line

Who it is best for

  • Side sleepers who want deep contouring without losing alignment

  • Couples who prioritize a calmer, quieter surface

  • People who read in bed and want gentle, stable cushioning

Where it falls short

  • Turning can feel slower and more “effortful” than the hybrid

  • Edge support is serviceable, not confidence-inspiring for prolonged edge sleeping

  • Plush feel may be too yielding for heavier stomach sleepers

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Strong pressure relief at shoulders/hips Slower feel when turning
Excellent motion isolation Edge support is only fair
Zoned support helps alignment Plush feel can reduce surface “stability”

Details

  • Mattress type: all-foam (memory-foam construction)

  • Profile height: 14"

  • Feel: plush

  • Support approach: zoned support for spinal alignment

  • Cooling approach: cool-feel fabric cues and heat-managing foams

  • Adjustable base compatible: yes

  • Warranty: 10-year limited (retailer-listed)

  • Sizes shown in Schewels listings: Twin XL through California King

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Support 4.2 Zoning kept hips reasonably level, even on longer side-sleep stretches.
Cooling 4.0 Better than many foams, but prolonged stillness can warm the surface.
Pressure Relief 4.8 Best of the group for shoulder/hip comfort in side sleeping.
Motion Isolation 4.8 Partner movement barely registered in our overnight trials.
Responsiveness 3.8 Comfortable but slower to rebound during repeated turns.
Edge Support 3.7 Fine for sitting briefly, less ideal for edge sleeping.
Durability 4.0 Thick foam build and zoning suggest solid long-term support retention.
Overall 4.3 A pressure-relief specialist with strong quiet comfort and modest trade-offs.

iComfort Aveda 12" Memory Foam Medium

Our Testing Experience

This one felt more “organized” the moment I lay down—less sink, more even support across my lower back. On my side, I still got enough give for my shoulder, but not the deep cradle of the Aspire. Mia liked the way her hip settled without her knee feeling twisted inward; she described it as “soft enough to land, firm enough to hold.” Marcus appreciated that it resisted dip at the hips, and he reported less heat buildup than he expected from foam. For Jenna and Ethan, it was calm for movement, but Ethan still preferred the hybrid’s easier turning.

What we liked

  • Balanced medium feel that kept hips and lumbar area tidy

  • Cool-feel surface and good temperature management for a foam build

  • Smooth transition from top comfort to deeper support

Who it is best for

  • Back and combo sleepers who want medium foam with structure

  • Side sleepers who want contouring but dislike overly plush sink

  • People who want a calmer surface for partner sleep

Where it falls short

  • Less bounce than the hybrid, especially for restless repositioning

  • Edge support is average when both sleepers drift outward

  • If you want a plush “hug,” this is not the one

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Balanced support with noticeable zoning Less responsive than a hybrid
Cooler feel than typical all-foam Edge support is average
Excellent motion isolation Not plush enough for some side sleepers

Details

  • Mattress type: all-foam (memory foam)

  • Profile height: 12"

  • Feel: medium

  • Support approach: 5-zone support design

  • Cooling approach: cool-feel fabric + graphite/heat-managing memory foam

  • Adjustable base friendly: yes

  • Warranty: 10-year limited (manufacturer/retailer-listed)

  • Sizes shown in Schewels listings: Twin XL through California King

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Support 4.4 Most consistent foam support under hips and lumbar area in our group.
Cooling 4.1 Better thermal control than typical foam, especially early-night comfort.
Pressure Relief 4.1 Comfortable for side sleeping, but less cushion than the plush Aspire.
Motion Isolation 4.7 Very steady surface with minimal partner disturbance.
Responsiveness 3.9 Smoother than the plush, still not as quick as the hybrid.
Edge Support 3.8 Acceptable for sitting; mild compression near edges when lying close.
Durability 4.0 Zoned design and medium feel should hold alignment well over time.
Overall 4.2 The “medium foam” pick for sleepers who want structure without harshness.

iComfort Iona 13" Memory Foam Medium

Our Testing Experience

The Iona felt like the calmer sibling to the Aveda—still medium, but with a slightly more forgiving landing before the support firmed up underneath. On my back, my midsection felt evenly held, and I didn’t wake up with that dull mid-back fatigue that shows up when a foam bed lets the torso sink unevenly. Mia said her shoulder pressure stayed controlled as long as she didn’t scrunch too far into a tight fetal curl. Marcus liked the alignment, but he called the edge “polite”—fine, not grippy. Jenna and Ethan thought it was the best all-foam for reducing motion, but Ethan again preferred the hybrid for fast turning.

What we liked

  • Even alignment and a smooth, not-jarring support transition

  • Strong motion isolation for shared sleep

  • Medium feel with a touch of surface forgiveness

Who it is best for

  • Back sleepers who want steady alignment

  • Combo sleepers who prefer foam but still change positions

  • Couples who prioritize minimal night-to-night disturbance

Where it falls short

  • Edge support is not the strongest in the lineup

  • Faster-moving sleepers may want more bounce

  • Very sensitive side sleepers may still prefer the plush Aspire

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Even support with a forgiving top feel Edge support is only fair
Excellent motion isolation Less bounce than hybrid
Medium feel suits many sleepers Not as plush as the Aspire

Details

  • Mattress type: all-foam (foam construction)

  • Profile height: 13"

  • Feel: medium

  • Support approach: 5-zone support design

  • Cooling approach: cool-feel fabric cues and heat-managing foam

  • Adjustable base friendly: yes

  • Warranty: 10-year limited (retailer-listed)

  • Sizes shown in Schewels listings: Twin XL through California King

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Support 4.3 Consistent alignment across back and side without a “dip” sensation.
Cooling 4.0 Comfortable surface temperature; still warms slightly with prolonged contact.
Pressure Relief 4.2 Good joint comfort, though not as plushly cradling as the Aspire.
Motion Isolation 4.7 Very strong disturbance control for couples.
Responsiveness 4.0 A touch quicker than plush foam, still slower than the hybrid.
Edge Support 3.7 Fine for occasional sitting; less confidence near the edge overnight.
Durability 4.0 Medium feel and zoned approach suggest stable long-term support.
Overall 4.1 A steady medium foam option with standout motion control and balanced comfort.

Perfect Sleeper Dazzling Night 12" Hybrid Medium

Our Testing Experience

The hybrid immediately changed the rhythm of the room: when I turned, it felt like the bed met me halfway. The surface had that gentle lift that makes repositioning feel simpler—especially for Ethan, who kept saying it “lets me turn without thinking about it.” On my back, the support felt centered under the hips, and I noticed fewer micro-adjustments during the first hour of winding down. Marcus liked the edge most on this one; sitting to tie shoes didn’t feel like sliding off a slope. The trade-off showed up in couple testing: Jenna could still feel Ethan’s bigger turns, but it stayed controlled enough that it didn’t become a nightly annoyance.

What we liked

  • Best ease of turning and the most natural rebound

  • Strongest edge support in the group for sitting and edge sleeping

  • Support felt targeted through the middle of the bed

Who it is best for

  • Couples who want a more responsive mattress

  • Combo sleepers who switch positions often

  • People who use the edge frequently (getting dressed, stretching, edge sleeping)

Where it falls short

  • More motion transfer than the all-foam models

  • If you want a deep foam “hug,” it may feel too buoyant

  • Light sleepers may notice partner shifts more than on iComfort foam

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Most responsive feel for turning More motion than all-foam
Strong edge support Less “hug” than plush foam
Zoned coil support feels stable Coil character is noticeable to some sleepers

Details

  • Mattress type: hybrid

  • Profile height: 12"

  • Feel: medium option available in the line

  • Support approach: 3-zoned coil design

  • Comfort materials: Cool Twist® Gel Memory Foam (gel memory foam layers)

  • Adjustable base friendly: yes

  • Warranty: 10-year limited (retailer-listed on comparable listings)

  • Sizes shown in Schewels listings: Twin XL through California King

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Support 4.5 Zoned coil feel stayed stable under hips and midsection across positions.
Cooling 4.2 Better airflow feel during frequent turning compared with all-foam beds.
Pressure Relief 4.2 Good contouring without deep sink; slightly less plush than Aspire.
Motion Isolation 4.1 Controlled, but partner turns are more noticeable than all-foam models.
Responsiveness 4.6 Fastest turning experience; easiest “get comfortable again” after waking.
Edge Support 4.4 Best seated and edge-lying stability among the four.
Durability 4.3 Coil-based support and moderate feel suggest strong long-term structure.
Overall 4.4 The most versatile pick: responsive, stable edges, and broadly comfortable.

Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses

Mattress Overall Score Support Pressure Relief Cooling Motion Isolation Durability Responsiveness
iComfort Aspire 14" Memory Foam Plush 4.3 4.2 4.8 4.0 4.8 4.0 3.8
iComfort Aveda 12" Memory Foam Medium 4.2 4.4 4.1 4.1 4.7 4.0 3.9
iComfort Iona 13" Memory Foam Medium 4.1 4.3 4.2 4.0 4.7 4.0 4.0
Perfect Sleeper Dazzling Night 12" Hybrid Medium 4.4 4.5 4.2 4.2 4.1 4.3 4.6

The most even performer was the Dazzling Night hybrid—no single weak spot, and it led on responsiveness and edge use. The Aspire clearly wins pressure relief and motion isolation, but it gives back points in turning ease. Aveda and Iona are close; Aveda tilts slightly more structured, while Iona feels marginally more forgiving at the surface.

How to Choose a Schewels Mattress

Start with sleep position and how often you move: frequent turners and combo sleepers usually do better on the hybrid, while dedicated side sleepers often prefer the plush foam. If you sleep hot, favor the iComfort foams’ cooling cues or the hybrid’s airflow feel. For couples, choose all-foam if you want maximum motion isolation; choose the hybrid if you want easier turning and stronger edges. Lightweight side sleepers: Aspire. Average-weight back/combo: Aveda or Iona. Couples who use the edge: Dazzling Night.

Limitations

These models cluster around familiar “medium-to-plush” comfort, so ultra-firm enthusiasts may feel under-supported, especially on the plush foam. The all-foam options can feel less lively for restless sleepers and can underwhelm on edge stability. The hybrid improves edges and turning, but it sacrifices some motion isolation, which can matter for very light sleepers sharing a bed.

Schewels Mattress Vs. Alternatives

  • Why choose these models

    • Zoned support designs target alignment without an overly rigid feel

    • Strong mainstream “middle feel” options that fit many sleep styles

    • Clear differentiation: plush pressure relief vs. medium balance vs. hybrid responsiveness

  • Alternatives to consider

    • Tempur-Pedic TEMPUR-Adapt (for denser contouring and a slower, heavier foam feel)

    • Sealy Posturepedic (for shoppers prioritizing a more traditional, firmer support character)

    • Beautyrest Harmony Lux (for those who want a more classic coil-forward sleep with different feel profiles)

Pro Tips for Schewels Mattress

  • Give yourself at least a full week of consistent sleep before judging a foam feel; the first-night “new surface” sensation can mislead.

  • If you run warm, use breathable sheets and a thin protector; thick toppers can cancel the cooling cues of the cover.

  • For plush foam, rotate your position across the bed during the first month to keep early compression even.

  • If you sit on the edge daily, favor the hybrid or add a supportive bed frame/center support to reduce edge fatigue.

  • For side sleepers on medium foam, use a slightly higher-loft pillow to keep the neck level as the shoulder settles.

  • If you wake with hip tightness, try a small knee pillow on your side or a thin pillow under knees on your back before changing mattresses.

  • For couples, test motion the way you actually live: one person gets in/out while the other stays still, then swap.

  • Keep the room cool and consistent during your trial period; temperature swings can change how foam feels night to night.

  • If turning feels “sticky,” switch to smoother sheets and reduce heavy quilting layers in your bedding stack.

FAQs

Is the plush iComfort Aspire too soft for back sleeping?

If you spend most of the night on your back, it can still work, but you need to feel your hips staying level. In our logs, it was best for back sleepers who like deeper contouring and don’t want a firm surface.

Which of these is most couple-friendly?

If your priority is minimal disturbance, the iComfort models isolate motion best. If your priority is easy turning and strong edges for two sleepers, the Dazzling Night hybrid was the most practical.

Which one felt coolest during real use?

All four managed heat reasonably, but the iComfort foams felt cooler at first contact, while the hybrid stayed more consistent when we changed positions often.

What’s the simplest way to choose between Aveda and Iona?

Choose Aveda if you want a slightly more “structured” medium. Choose Iona if you want a medium feel with a touch more surface forgiveness.

Previous post
Next post
Back to Best Mattress Reviews

Our Testing Team

Chris Miller

Lead Tester

Chris oversees the full testing pipeline for mattresses, sofas, and other home products. He coordinates the team, designs scoring frameworks, and lives with every product long enough to feel real strengths and weaknesses. His combination-sleeping and mixed lounging habits keep him focused on long-term comfort and support.

Marcus Reed

Heavyweight Sofa & Mattress Tester

Marcus brings a heavier build and heat-sensitive profile into every test. He pushes deep cushions, edges, and frames harder than most users. His feedback highlights whether a design holds up under load, runs hot, or collapses into a hammock-like slump during long gaming or streaming sessions.

Carlos Alvarez

Posture & Work-From-Home Specialist

Carlos spends long hours working from sofas and beds with a laptop. He tracks how mid-back, neck, and lumbar regions respond to different setups. His notes reveal whether a product keeps posture neutral during extended sitting or lying, and whether small adjustments still feel stable and controlled.

Mia Chen

Petite Side-Sleeper & Lounger

Mia tests how mattresses and sofas treat a smaller frame during side sleeping and curled-up lounging. She feels pressure and seat-depth problems very quickly. Her feedback exposes designs that swallow shorter users, leave feet dangling, or create sharp pressure points at shoulders, hips, and knees.

Jenna Brooks

Couple Comfort & Motion Tester

Jenna evaluates how well sofas and mattresses handle real shared use with a partner. She tracks motion transfer, usable width, and edge comfort when two adults spread out. Her comments highlight whether a product supports relaxed couple lounging, easy repositioning, and quiet nights without constant disturbance.

Jamal Davis

Tall, Active-Body Tester

Jamal brings a tall, athletic frame and post-workout soreness into the lab. He checks seat depth, leg support, and surface responsiveness on every product. His notes show whether cushions bounce back, frames feel solid under long legs, and sleep surfaces support joints during recovery stretches and naps.

Ethan Cole

Restless Lounger & Partner Tester

Ethan acts as the moving partner in many couple-focused tests. He shifts positions frequently and pays attention to how easily a surface lets him turn, slide, or return after short breaks. His feedback exposes cushions that feel too squishy, too sticky, or poorly shaped for real-world lounging patterns.