Roberts Furniture & Mattress carries several bed-in-a-box options that skew budget-to-midrange, with a lineup that ranges from simple innersprings to thicker hybrids and memory foam. I focused on support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability to clarify which models feel most balanced, which feel specialized, and who should skip them.
Product overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium 2.0 Hybrid 14 Inch | 4.3 | Strong all-around support; cushioned top feel | Not the best if you need ultra-low motion | Back/side sleepers wanting a thicker hybrid feel | $649.99+ |
| Chime 10 Inch Hybrid Medium | 4.1 | Balanced hybrid feel; easy to settle into | Cooling is solid, not “cold” | Combination sleepers and couples on a budget | $299.99+ |
| Millennium 2.0 Foam 12 Inch | 4.0 | Excellent motion isolation; deep pressure relief | Slower turn-over feel; edges are softer | Side sleepers who like foam contouring | $459.99+ |
| Peak 2.0 Bonnell | 3.7 | Lively, traditional bounce; breathable coil feel | Noticeable motion transfer | Guest rooms and people who like a basic innerspring | $219.99+ |
Testing Team Takeaways
After rotating through the four beds, we agreed the Millennium 2.0 Hybrid felt the most “complete” night to night, especially for alignment. The Chime 10 Hybrid was the easiest recommendation for couples on a tighter budget. The Millennium 2.0 Foam isolated movement best but felt slower to reposition on. The Peak 2.0 Bonnell stayed cool and springy, yet it gave up too much motion control for partner sleep.
Roberts Mattress comparison chart
| Mattress | Type | Thickness | Available sizes | Materials and build notes | Cooling notes | Feel from our testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium 2.0 Hybrid 14 Inch | Hybrid | 14 in | Twin Long, Queen, King, California King | Gel memory foam and body contouring foam over a NanoCoil unit and individually wrapped coils | Temperature-regulating material in the stretch knit cover | Medium-plush surface with a steadier pushback underneath |
| Chime 10 Inch Hybrid Medium | Hybrid innerspring | 10 in | Twin, Full, Queen, King, California King | Gel-infused memory foam with pocketed coils; high-density quilt foam | Cooling gel-infused foam; airflow from coils | Medium feel with quick, tidy response when turning |
| Millennium 2.0 Foam 12 Inch | Memory foam | 12 in | Twin Long, Queen, King, California King | Gel memory foam and high-density support foam; green tea-infused support foam base | Temperature-regulating cover; gel foam helps temper heat | Deeper contour, quieter surface, slower rebound |
| Peak 2.0 Bonnell | Innerspring | 8 in | Twin, Full, Queen, King, California King | Quilt foam and luxury loft fiber over a Bonnell coil unit with base foam | Hyper Cool cover; open coil structure | Firm-leaning, bouncy, more “traditional mattress” |
How we tested it
We rotated each mattress through real nightly sleep and daytime use, focusing on support for lumbar and hip alignment, cooling during heat buildup, and pressure relief at shoulders and hips. We measured motion isolation with partner movement drills, checked responsiveness during repeated turning, and evaluated edge support while sitting to put on shoes or getting in and out of bed. We also kept notes on durability indicators like surface stability and how the feel changed after repeated use.
Roberts Mattress: our testing experience
Across the four models, I kept the same routine: I started each week with a full night on my back, then forced side-sleep stretches to see whether my hips stayed level. Marcus deliberately pushed heat buildup and edge behavior, while Jenna and Ethan handled the couple tests and the “does it wake me up?” reality check.
Millennium 2.0 Hybrid 14 Inch
Our Testing Experience
The first thing I noticed was how the surface felt plush without turning mushy. On my back, my lower back didn’t hang in space; it felt like the coils were holding the line while the top layer took the edge off. When I rolled to my side, my shoulder sank in enough to feel settled, but my hips didn’t drift downward. Marcus liked the steadier midsection support and said it resisted that “hammock” feeling he hates. Jenna and Ethan felt movement, but it was muted enough that it didn’t become a constant interruption.
What we liked
-
Thick hybrid feel with a stable core that kept my hips from dipping
-
Comfortable pressure relief without losing a supported “platform” feel
-
Easy to change positions without fighting the surface
Who it is best for
-
Back and side sleepers who want cushion plus structure
-
Couples who want a hybrid without an overly lively bounce
-
People who sit on the edge often and want better perimeter stability
Where it falls short
-
If you demand ultra-low motion transfer, it is not the quietest surface
-
If you prefer an extra-firm, flat feel, the top may feel too plush
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong overall support and alignment feel | Not the absolute best motion isolation in this set |
| Plush top with stable coil pushback | Plush surface may be too soft for strict firm lovers |
| Comfortable for mixed back/side nights |
Details
-
Price: $649.99+
-
Thickness: 14 in
-
Type: hybrid mattress
-
Materials (as described): temperature-regulating stretch knit cover; gel memory foam; body contouring foam; NanoCoil unit; individually wrapped coils
-
Available sizes: Twin Long, Queen, King, California King
-
Shipping: -
-
Trial period: -
-
Warranty: -
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.6 | Kept my lumbar and Marcus’s hips from sagging |
| Cooling | 4.3 | Stayed comfortable through heat buildup, even on longer nights |
| Pressure Relief | 4.4 | Shoulder and hip comfort stayed consistent without feeling stuck |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Noticeably calmer than Bonnell, but not silent |
| Responsiveness | 4.1 | Turning felt natural; no “climb out” sensation |
| Edge Support | 4.4 | Stronger perimeter feel when sitting and getting up |
| Durability | 4.4 | Surface stayed stable with repeat use and position changes |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Best blend of comfort and structure in this group |
Chime 10 Inch Hybrid Medium
Our Testing Experience
This one felt like the “easy yes” hybrid. I could lie down and get comfortable quickly without needing to hunt for the right position. On my back, it held my hips up better than a lot of budget foams, and on my side it gave enough give at the shoulder to avoid that sharp pressure point. Jenna immediately noticed the calmer response when Ethan turned, and Ethan liked that it “let me turn without thinking about it.” Marcus still felt some bounce, but it didn’t get chaotic.
What we liked
-
Balanced, medium feel that worked in multiple positions
-
Better motion control than a basic innerspring
-
Quick setup style and straightforward comfort
Who it is best for
-
Combination sleepers who rotate between back and side
-
Couples who want a more stable surface than a traditional coil bed
-
Guest rooms where you want broad appeal
Where it falls short
-
Cooling is good, but it is not a specialty cold-sleep bed
-
Edge stability is respectable, not rock-solid
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Well-rounded hybrid feel with easy position changes | Edge support is mid-pack in this lineup |
| Solid motion isolation for a budget hybrid | Cooling is steady rather than “actively cold” |
| Comfortable for back/side switching |
Details
-
Price: $299.99+
-
Thickness: 10 in
-
Type: hybrid innerspring mattress
-
Materials (as described): cooling gel-infused memory foam; pocketed coils; high density quilt foam
-
Setup notes: arrives in a box; foundation/box spring available separately
-
Available sizes: Twin, Full, Queen, King, California King
-
Shipping: -
-
Trial period: -
-
Warranty: -
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2 | Kept my hips aligned well for a 10-inch hybrid |
| Cooling | 3.9 | No major heat spikes, but not the coolest feel here |
| Pressure Relief | 4.1 | Side sleeping stayed comfortable without deep sink |
| Motion Isolation | 4.2 | Jenna noticed fewer wakeups from Ethan’s turning |
| Responsiveness | 4.0 | Turning felt easy and predictable |
| Edge Support | 4.0 | Stable enough for sitting, less reinforced than the thicker hybrid |
| Durability | 4.1 | Surface feel stayed consistent through repeat nights |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Strong generalist option for mixed sleepers |
Millennium 2.0 Foam 12 Inch
Our Testing Experience
This was the quietest bed in the group once we actually lived on it. When I read in bed and shifted around, the surface absorbed movement instead of kicking it back. Jenna loved it for partner sleep because Ethan’s repositioning didn’t ripple across the mattress. The trade-off showed up when I tried to roll from side to back: it wasn’t difficult, but it took more intention than the hybrids. Marcus felt supported at first, yet he preferred the coil-backed options because he could feel the foam “hug” more around his hips.
What we liked
-
Best motion isolation of the four
-
Pressure relief that stayed noticeable during longer side stretches
-
Calm, quiet surface that felt steady at night
Who it is best for
-
Couples who prioritize staying asleep through partner movement
-
Side sleepers who want deeper foam contouring
-
Anyone who prefers a quieter, less bouncy feel
Where it falls short
-
Slower response makes quick turning feel less effortless
-
Softer edge feel than the hybrids when sitting up
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent motion isolation and a quiet surface | Less responsive feel when turning |
| Strong pressure relief for shoulders and hips | Edge support is softer than the coil beds |
| Comfortable foam contouring without harsh pressure points |
Details
-
Price: $459.99+
-
Thickness: 12 in
-
Type: memory foam mattress
-
Materials (as described): temperature-regulating stretch knit cover; gel memory foam; high-density support foam; green tea-infused support foam base
-
Available sizes: Twin Long, Queen, King, California King
-
Shipping: -
-
Trial period: -
-
Warranty: -
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.1 | Supportive for me, but Marcus preferred coil reinforcement |
| Cooling | 3.8 | Comfortable overall, with mild warmth during longer stretches |
| Pressure Relief | 4.4 | Best long-duration comfort during side sleeping |
| Motion Isolation | 4.7 | Clear winner for couple-friendly movement control |
| Responsiveness | 3.6 | Slower rebound made turning feel less automatic |
| Edge Support | 3.6 | Softer perimeter feel when sitting or drifting to the edge |
| Durability | 4.1 | Stable feel with repeat use; no early breakdown signs in our notes |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Great for motion control and pressure relief, with foam trade-offs |
Peak 2.0 Bonnell
Our Testing Experience
This mattress felt like the most traditional option: you lie down, you feel springs, and you get immediate bounce. Marcus appreciated that it didn’t trap heat, and he liked how quickly it pushed him back up when he rolled from stomach to back. For me, the support was decent, but the comfort layers felt thinner and less forgiving on my side. The couple testing was where it showed its limits: when Ethan shifted, Jenna felt the movement travel. It wasn’t unlivable, but it was the only bed where we consistently wrote “motion” in our notes.
What we liked
-
Lively bounce that made turning effortless
-
Cooler, more breathable feel than the all-foam option
-
Simple, straightforward comfort for the price point
Who it is best for
-
Guest rooms where durability and simplicity matter
-
Back sleepers who like a firmer, spring-forward feel
-
Hot sleepers who want airflow more than contouring
Where it falls short
-
Motion transfer is the biggest drawback for couples
-
Side sleepers may want more pressure relief than the thin comfort feel
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Easy to move on with a springy feel | Most noticeable motion transfer in this lineup |
| Cooler, airy innerspring character | Less pressure relief for longer side sleeping |
| Good basic support for the price tier | Comfort feel can read “thin” compared with thicker hybrids |
Details
-
Price: $219.99+
-
Thickness: 8 in
-
Type: innerspring mattress
-
Materials (as described): quilt foam; luxury loft fiber; Bonnell coil unit; base foam; Hyper Cool cover
-
Available sizes: Twin, Full, Queen, King, California King
-
Shipping: -
-
Trial period: -
-
Warranty: -
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.9 | Supportive enough for back sleeping, less forgiving on my side |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Marcus stayed comfortable; airflow felt consistent |
| Pressure Relief | 3.6 | Thinner comfort feel showed up during longer side stretches |
| Motion Isolation | 2.8 | Couple tests clearly showed movement traveling across the surface |
| Responsiveness | 4.4 | The easiest bed to turn on and reposition quickly |
| Edge Support | 3.5 | Fine for sitting, not as confidence-inspiring as the thicker hybrid |
| Durability | 3.6 | Basic build felt solid, but lacks the “reinforced” feel of the top hybrid |
| Overall Score | 3.7 | Best for simplicity and bounce, weakest for couples |
Compare performance scores of these mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Millennium 2.0 Hybrid 14 Inch | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.1 |
| Chime 10 Inch Hybrid Medium | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 |
| Millennium 2.0 Foam 12 Inch | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 3.6 |
| Peak 2.0 Bonnell | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 2.8 | 3.6 | 4.4 |
The numbers tell a clean story. The Millennium 2.0 Hybrid 14 scored most evenly, without a single weak category. The Chime 10 Hybrid was the most balanced value play, especially for couples. The Millennium 2.0 Foam won motion isolation outright but gave back points on responsiveness and edge stability. The Peak 2.0 Bonnell had a clear advantage in responsiveness and a solid cooling showing, yet it fell behind sharply in motion control.
How to choose a Roberts mattress
Start with sleep position and how often you change positions: hybrids suit mixed sleepers, while foam favors pressure relief and motion control. If you sleep hot, prioritize coil-based airflow and breathable covers. Couples should focus on motion isolation first, then edge support. For lightweight-to-average side sleepers, Millennium 2.0 Foam 12 or Millennium 2.0 Hybrid 14 are the safest picks. For budget guest rooms, Peak 2.0 Bonnell is the simplest buy. For couples on a tighter budget, Chime 10 Hybrid is the most practical middle ground.
Limitations
The lineup here has clear trade-offs. Peak 2.0 Bonnell is the least couple-friendly due to motion transfer. Millennium 2.0 Foam 12 is quieter, but turning feels slower and edge sitting is softer, which may frustrate restless sleepers. Chime 10 Hybrid is balanced, yet it does not deliver premium-level cooling or perimeter reinforcement. Millennium 2.0 Hybrid 14 is the best all-rounder, but strict firm-mattress shoppers may find its plush top too yielding.
Roberts Mattress vs. alternatives
Reasons to choose these Roberts mattresses include approachable pricing tiers, familiar builds that match common sleeper preferences, and easy-to-shop size options in a straightforward lineup. If you want a widely known boxed hybrid with a “hotel-style” feel, models like DreamCloud Classic Hybrid are frequently positioned as strong all-around picks. If you want a cooling-forward hybrid, options like Bear Elite Hybrid are often highlighted for temperature management.
Pro tips for Roberts Mattress
-
Give the mattress a consistent break-in window by sleeping on it normally before judging firmness day to day
-
Use a breathable protector to reduce heat buildup without changing the feel too much
-
If you sit on the edge daily, rotate your sitting spot to reduce localized compression
-
For foam models, use a sturdy foundation to keep the surface from feeling softer over time
-
For hybrids, keep the room temperature steady so “cooling” features don’t get masked by a hot bedroom
-
If you wake with hip tightness, try a thinner pillow or a slight knee support to reduce pelvic tilt
-
Couples: test movement control by having one person roll and stand up while the other stays still
-
If you move a lot at night, prioritize responsiveness over pure plushness
-
Match bedding to the mattress: thicker quilts can trap heat and make any bed feel warmer
-
Re-check alignment by lying on your side and confirming your hips don’t dip lower than your shoulders
Roberts mattress FAQs
Q: Which model is best for couples who wake easily?
A: Millennium 2.0 Foam 12, with Chime 10 Hybrid as a close second.
Q: Which one feels easiest to turn on?
A: Peak 2.0 Bonnell, followed by the two hybrids.
Q: Which is the most balanced overall?
A: Millennium 2.0 Hybrid 14.
Q: Which is most likely to feel “huggy”?
A: Millennium 2.0 Foam 12.
