Luna Mattress is a pocket-spring-and-foam lineup that aims for “comfortable support” more than deep sink, with a clear step-up from lighter hybrids to thicker, gel-foam comfort builds. We tested four on-sale models across support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability to map who each one fits best, and where each one can frustrate picky sleepers.
Product overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luna Memory 1000 Pocket Hybrid Mattress | 3.9 | Balanced medium feel; breathable design cues; reinforced perimeter | Not the most robust support for heavier bodies; slower surface response | Guest rooms, average-weight sleepers, people who like a true medium | - |
| Luna Memory 2500 Pocket Hybrid Mattress | 4.2 | Stronger pocket-spring support; steadier edges; good airflow features | Still has a “memory” settle; can feel firm to sensitive shoulders | Back sleepers, combo sleepers, couples wanting a stable middle ground | - |
| Luna 4000 Plush Gel Memory Pocket Hybrid Mattress | 4.2 | Noticeably plusher pressure relief; strong motion control; reinforced edge feel | Softer support can bother strict stomach sleepers | Side sleepers, pressure-point sensitive sleepers, light-to-average couples | - |
| Luna 4000 Support Gel Memory Pocket Hybrid Mattress | 4.4 | Most supportive and “held-up” feel; dependable edges; strong couple stability | Firmer presentation can feel too upright for plush lovers | Back sleepers, heavier couples, sleepers who hate sag or roll-together | - |
Testing team takeaways
Across the lineup, the step-up in spring systems changes the whole vibe: the 1000 is the easiest to live with at a true medium, while the 2500 feels more planted and less “wavy” under load. The 4000 Plush is where Jenna settled fastest for shoulder comfort, but Ethan preferred the 4000 Support because turning never felt sticky. Marcus consistently favored the firmer builds for hip control and cooler, less trapped sleep.
Luna Mattress comparison chart
| Comparison item | Luna Memory 1000 Pocket Hybrid | Luna Memory 2500 Pocket Hybrid | Luna 4000 Plush Gel Memory Pocket Hybrid | Luna 4000 Support Gel Memory Pocket Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Firmness | Medium | Medium to firm | Soft to medium | Medium to firm |
| Type | Pocket springs + foam | Pocket springs + foam | Pocket springs + foam | Pocket springs + foam |
| Pocket spring count | 1000 | 2500 | 4000 | 4000 |
| Depth | 20cm | 24cm | 25cm | 25cm |
| Available sizes | Single to Superking | Single to Superking | Single to Superking | Single to Superking |
| Cover / care note | Knitted cover; removable cover noted | Knitted cover; removable cover noted | Removable cover | Removable cover |
| Edge support (spec) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Trial / warranty | 60-night trial; 10-year guarantee | 60-night trial; 10-year guarantee | 60-night trial; 10-year guarantee | 60-night trial; 10-year guarantee |
| Support score | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.6 |
| Pressure relief score | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Cooling score | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.3 |
| Motion isolation score | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 |
| Responsiveness score | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.1 |
| Durability score | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.4 |
How we tested it
We rotated through back, side, and short stomach-nap positions, tracking lumbar “settle” and hip alignment the morning after. Cooling was judged by how quickly heat built up in the first 30 minutes and whether we woke up clammy. Pressure relief came from shoulder/hip comfort during longer side-sleep blocks. For motion isolation and responsiveness, we did partner in-and-out drills and slow rollovers to see if the surface helped or fought the move. Edge support was checked sitting, tying shoes, and drifting near the perimeter, while durability focused on how the surface and edges held their feel over repeated nights.
Luna Mattress: our testing experience
Luna Memory 1000 Pocket Hybrid Mattress
Our testing experience
The first thing I noticed was the true medium presentation—my hips didn’t drop, but my shoulders also didn’t feel perched. When I read in bed with a laptop, the perimeter felt more usable than I expected; I could sit and shift without that “sliding off” sensation. Marcus liked the initial cool feel, but after a warmer night he wanted more pushback under his hips than this build gave him. Jenna and Ethan both called it “quiet enough,” but not the dead-still kind of quiet.
What we liked
- Balanced medium feel
- Stable perimeter sitting
- Easy nightly acclimation
Who it is best for
- Average-weight combo sleepers
- Guest-room use
- People who dislike ultra-plush sink
Where it falls short
- Heavier stomach sleepers
- Those wanting a fast, bouncy top
- People who need a firmer hold-up feel
Pros & cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Medium feel works for many sleep styles | Can feel underpowered for heavier hips |
| Reinforced edge is usable for sitting | Surface response is not “springy-fast” |
| Breathability-oriented construction cues | Not the strongest “locked-in” support |
Details
- Price: -
- Firmness: Medium
- Sizes: Single, Small Double, Double, King Size, Superking
- Depth: 20cm
- Support system: Pocket Springs, Reflex Foam
- Pocket spring count: 1000
- Comfort fillings: Memory Foam
- Cooling notes: Adaptive cover technology + airflow channels described
- Edge support: Yes
- Rolled-up: Yes
- Single-sided: Yes; rotate every 3 months
- Cover care: removable cover noted; sponge clean mentioned
- Trial period: 60-night comfort trial
- Warranty: 10-year guarantee
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.0 | Medium support held my lumbar fairly level, but less “lift” under heavier load |
| Pressure Relief | 3.9 | Comfortable, though not the deepest shoulder cradle on long side-sleep blocks |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Stayed reasonably fresh; no pronounced heat-trap feel for me |
| Motion Isolation | 4.1 | Partner movement stayed contained, but not completely “dead” |
| Responsiveness | 3.8 | Fine for normal turns; slower than bouncier hybrids |
| Edge Support | 4.0 | Sitting and near-edge sleeping felt secure enough |
| Durability | 3.8 | Good early stability, but not the stoutest build in the lineup |
| Overall | 3.9 | Balanced, approachable medium that works best for average-weight sleepers |
Luna Memory 2500 Pocket Hybrid Mattress
Our testing experience
This one felt more “locked in” the moment I lay down—my lower back stayed flatter, and my hips didn’t drift into the bed over the night. I could feel the step-up in stability when I rolled from back to side; the surface didn’t wobble under me. Marcus immediately noticed the stronger hip control, and he also said the edges felt more dependable when sitting to tie his shoes. Jenna and Ethan both liked that getting in and out didn’t ripple across the mattress in a big way, especially compared with softer builds.
What we liked
- Stronger midsection support
- Confident edge-to-edge feel
- Even, steady surface
Who it is best for
- Back sleepers who like medium-firm
- Couples wanting stability
- Combo sleepers who change positions
Where it falls short
- Very pressure-sensitive shoulders
- People who want a plush, deep hug
- Anyone who hates memory “settle”
Pros & cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Noticeably sturdier support than the 1000 | Can read firm for lighter side sleepers |
| Stable for couples and position changes | Surface has a mild memory-foam settle |
| Reinforced edge helps usable sleep area | Less “pillow-top” softness up top |
Details
- Price: -
- Firmness: Medium to firm
- Sizes: Single, Small Double, Double, King Size, Superking
- Depth: 24cm
- Support system: Pocket Springs, Reflex Foam
- Pocket spring count: 2500
- Comfort fillings: Memory Foam
- Notable comfort layer: 4cm layer noted
- Edge support: Yes
- Airflow cues: air channels + moisture-wicking cover technology described
- Rolled-up: Yes
- Single-sided: Yes; rotate every few months
- Cover care: removable cover noted; sponge clean mentioned
- Trial period: 60-night comfort trial
- Warranty: 10-year guarantee
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4 | Kept my hips level and reduced morning lower-back tightness |
| Pressure Relief | 4.1 | Good contour without bottoming out, though not plush-soft |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Airflow features helped; heat didn’t build aggressively |
| Motion Isolation | 4.2 | Partner movement stayed controlled during in-and-out drills |
| Responsiveness | 4.0 | Turns were smooth; less “stuck” than denser-feeling foam beds |
| Edge Support | 4.3 | Sitting and near-edge sleep felt stable and predictable |
| Durability | 4.2 | Surface feel stayed consistent through repeated use and rotation |
| Overall | 4.2 | The lineup’s most balanced “support-forward” option |
Luna 4000 Plush Gel Memory Pocket Hybrid Mattress
Our testing experience
The first night, my shoulder sank in faster and deeper than on the 1000 or 2500, and I could feel the bed trying to even out pressure across my ribcage when I stayed on my side. Jenna called this the “easy exhale” mattress—she stopped fussing with her pillow earlier, which usually signals her shoulders are finally happy. Ethan liked how it absorbed his turning without making him work, but Marcus felt the plusher presentation gave his hips a little too much permission to drift forward when he rolled to his stomach.
What we liked
- Softer pressure relief
- Quiet partner handling
- Comfortable side-sleep entry
Who it is best for
- Side sleepers needing gentler give
- Couples sensitive to motion
- People who dislike a firm surface
Where it falls short
- Dedicated stomach sleepers
- Heavier bodies wanting rigid hip lift
- Anyone who prefers a taut top
Pros & cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Soft-to-medium feel helps pressure points | Too soft for some stomach sleepers |
| Strong motion control for couples | Slightly slower, “plusher” rebound |
| Reinforced perimeter feels dependable | Less “lift” than firmer Luna builds |
Details
- Price: -
- Firmness: Soft to medium
- Sizes: Single, Small Double, Double, King Size, Superking
- Depth: 25cm
- Support system: Pocket Springs
- Pocket spring count: 4000
- Comfort fillings: Memory Foam, Mini Pocket Springs, Microquilted
- Cooling notes: cooling gel memory foam + dual 2cm layers described
- Edge support: Yes; foam encapsulated border described
- Single-sided: Yes; rotate every 6 months
- Cover care: removable cover; dry clean described
- Trial period: 60-night comfort trial
- Warranty: 10-year guarantee
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.1 | Supportive for me, but softer presentation can let heavier hips drift |
| Pressure Relief | 4.5 | Best shoulder/hip comfort in the set, especially on the side |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Gel-foam design cues helped keep the surface from feeling muggy |
| Motion Isolation | 4.3 | Couple movement stayed damped and less “wavey” than lighter builds |
| Responsiveness | 3.9 | Easy enough to move, but still a plush, slower feel |
| Edge Support | 4.3 | Perimeter felt reinforced and usable for edge sleeping |
| Durability | 4.2 | Held its feel well; edge reinforcement inspires confidence |
| Overall | 4.2 | The pressure-relief pick, with a softer personality |
Luna 4000 Support Gel Memory Pocket Hybrid Mattress
Our testing experience
This is the model that felt the most “upright” under my lower back—on my back, my hips stayed up and my spine felt straighter by morning. Marcus immediately appreciated the firmer hold; he stopped complaining about that subtle hammocking sensation that shows up for him on softer beds. Jenna and Ethan both noticed the bed stayed composed when one person climbed in late; it handled their couple drills with less bounce than the 2500 and less sink than the Plush. When I switched from side to back, the mattress helped me settle quickly without feeling trapped.
What we liked
- Strongest lumbar/hip hold
- Controlled couple movement
- Secure edge sitting
Who it is best for
- Back sleepers who want medium-firm
- Heavier couples
- People who hate roll-together
Where it falls short
- Plush-only preferences
- Strict side sleepers needing deep sink
- Very light bodies who feel “on top”
Pros & cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Most supportive, “held-up” feel in the lineup | Can feel too firm for plush seekers |
| Excellent stability for couples and restless sleepers | Less immediate shoulder cushion than Plush |
| Reinforced edges feel dependable for sitting | Firmer surface can highlight pressure points |
Details
- Price: -
- Firmness: Medium to firm
- Sizes: Single, Small Double, Double, King Size, Superking
- Depth: 25cm
- Support system: Pocket Springs
- Pocket spring count: 4000
- Internal spring structure detail: 2000 full-size + 2000 mini springs described
- Comfort fillings: Memory Foam, Mini Pocket Springs, Microquilted
- Back care note: Orthopaedic support
- Cooling notes: 2cm cooling gel memory foam layers described
- Edge support: Yes; foam encapsulated border described
- Single-sided: Yes; rotate every 6 months
- Cover care: removable cover; dry clean described
- Trial period: 60-night comfort trial
- Warranty: 10-year guarantee
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.6 | Best spinal steadiness for my back-sleeping nights and Marcus’s hips |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Better than most firm beds, but less plush than the 4000 Plush |
| Cooling | 4.3 | Stayed fresher on warm nights; less heat buildup than I expected |
| Motion Isolation | 4.4 | Couple drills stayed calm with minimal roll-together sensation |
| Responsiveness | 4.1 | Turns felt easy; less “sticky” than denser foam surfaces |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | Strong sitting edge and dependable near-edge sleep stability |
| Durability | 4.4 | The most confidence-inspiring build for long-term hold-up |
| Overall | 4.4 | The lineup’s most stable, support-forward option |
Compare performance scores of these mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Luna Memory 1000 Pocket Hybrid Mattress | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 3.8 |
| Luna Memory 2500 Pocket Hybrid Mattress | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| Luna 4000 Plush Gel Memory Pocket Hybrid Mattress | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.9 |
| Luna 4000 Support Gel Memory Pocket Hybrid Mattress | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 |
The numbers tell a clean story: the 4000 Support is the most even, “no-drama” performer, leading support, motion isolation, edge steadiness, and durability. The 4000 Plush is the most specialized—its pressure relief stands out, but it trades away some of that rigid, upright hip control. The 2500 is the best middle-ground for people who want firmness without feeling board-like, while the 1000 is fine for many sleepers but shows the clearest ceiling under heavier, more demanding use.
How to choose a Luna Mattress model
Start with firmness and body weight: if you’re a back sleeper or you hate sag, prioritize the 4000 Support or the 2500. If you’re a side sleeper chasing gentler shoulder/hip comfort, the 4000 Plush is the easiest match. Hot sleepers should lean toward the models emphasizing cooling gel or airflow cues (4000 Support/Plush, then 2500). For couples, pick the 4000 Support for the most composed partner handling; choose the 2500 if you want a steadier feel without going fully firm.
Limitations
The lineup’s feel ladder is real: the 1000 can feel “not enough” for heavier stomach/back sleepers, while the 4000 Plush can feel too forgiving if you need your hips firmly propped up. The 2500 is supportive but still carries a mild memory-foam settle that can annoy bounce lovers. The 4000 Support is the least plush—great for posture, less great if you demand deep sink at the shoulders. If you’re extremely pressure-sensitive and very light, the firmer models can feel too elevated.
Luna Mattress vs. alternatives
Why choose these models: (1) a clear firmness step-up path within one brand lineup, (2) reinforced edges and pocket-spring designs that behave well for couples, and (3) cooling-leaning comfort materials on the 4000-level builds. If you want a different material vibe, consider the Silentnight Just Breathe Eco Comfort Hybrid for a firmer, fiber-forward feel, or the Mlily Bamboo+ Memory 800 Pocket for a simpler pocket-spring + memory-foam direction.
Pro tips for Luna Mattress owners
- Give each model a consistent two-week adjustment window before you judge it harshly.
- If you sit on the edge daily (shoes, scrolling), rotate on schedule to keep the perimeter uniform.
- Use a breathable mattress protector if you’re heat sensitive; it can preserve the “cooler” surface feel.
- For the firmer models, soften the first week with a thin, breathable topper rather than a thick foam slab.
- If you’re a side sleeper on the 2500 or 4000 Support, double-check pillow height to avoid neck tilt.
- Keep sheets taut; loose, heavy sheets can make plush foams feel stickier when turning.
- For couples, place the bed on a stable base before blaming the mattress for motion or sway.
- When testing a new feel, try three nights in a row on your dominant sleep side for a fair read.
- If you wake with hip tightness, shift one step softer; if you wake with lumbar tightness, shift one step firmer.
- Edge-sleepers should pick deeper profiles first, then confirm perimeter comfort by spending a full week near the edge.
FAQs
Q: Which Luna Mattress model is best for back sleepers?
A: The 4000 Support first, then the 2500 if you want slightly less firmness.
Q: Which is best for side sleepers with pressure points?
A: The 4000 Plush, because it offers the gentlest shoulder and hip give.
Q: Which model is most couple-friendly?
A: The 4000 Support for the most stable, low-roll-together feel; the Plush is a close second.