MLILY’s current lineup spans value-focused all-foam to premium hybrid builds, with a noticeable emphasis on cooling and spinal support. I tested four popular models across support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability, and the main split is simple: the hybrids feel sturdier at the perimeter and easier to move on, while the foams isolate motion better and feel more “still.”
Product overview at a glance
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLILY Dream | 3.8 | Strong motion isolation; balanced medium feel | Softer edges; slower to change positions | Guest rooms, light-to-average sleepers, partner movement sensitivity | From $339 |
| WellFlex ICE 1.0 Firmer | 4.0 | Cool-to-the-touch cover feel; strong, steady support | Firmer pressure relief for side sleepers; modest edge give | Hot sleepers who want firmer foam; back/stomach sleepers | From $1,899 |
| ChiroPro 1.0 | 4.2 | Very stable support; strong edge performance | Too firm for many lightweight side sleepers | Heavier bodies, back/stomach sleepers, people who hate “sink” | From $2,099 |
| ChiroPro 3.0 | 4.3 | Best balance of cushioning + support; easy to move | Slightly more partner feel than all-foam | Mixed-position sleepers, side sleepers needing relief without losing support | From $2,099 |
What stood out to our testing team
Across the four, the ChiroPro hybrids felt the most “structured,” especially at the edge and when changing positions, while the all-foam beds muted partner movement more effectively. The Dream worked as a calm, comfortable medium option, but it gave up edge stability. The WellFlex ICE 1.0 ran cooler at the surface and stayed flatter under my hips, though Mia (a petite side sleeper) noticed firmer pressure at the shoulder and outer hip on longer side-sleep stretches.
MLILY lineup comparison chart
| Feature | MLILY Dream | WellFlex ICE 1.0 Firmer | ChiroPro 1.0 | ChiroPro 3.0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Memory foam | Memory foam | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Thickness | 12" | 14" | 13" | 13" |
| Feel (brand positioning) | Medium | Firm | Between extra-firm | Between medium |
| Primary cooling approach | Tencel cover + airflow-oriented foam layers | PCM threads in cover + PCM in top foam | Breathable knit cover + airflow through coils | Breathable knit cover + airflow through coils |
| Motion isolation (test) | Excellent | Excellent | Good | Good |
| Responsiveness (test) | Moderate | Moderate | High | High |
| Edge support (test) | Fair | Fair-to-good | Very good | Very good |
| Pressure relief (test) | Good | Fair-to-good | Fair | Very good |
| Best match from our team | Light-to-average sleepers, guest-room use | Hot sleepers who want firmer foam | Marcus and Jamal for firm support | Mixed sleepers who still want cushion |
How we tested these MLILY mattresses
I rotated through the mattresses over multiple weeks, using the same bedding, pillow height, and bedtime routine to keep sensations comparable. We scored Support, Cooling, Pressure Relief, Motion Isolation, Responsiveness, Edge Support, and Durability based on overnight sleep, sitting and reading in bed, slow position changes, and repeated edge-perch get-ups in the morning. Marcus focused on heat buildup and whether his hips “hammocked,” Mia tracked shoulder and hip pressure, and Jamal assessed bounce and how easy it felt to turn.
MLILY: our hands-on testing experience
MLILY Dream
Our Testing Experience
The first thing I noticed was the calm, quiet surface. When I rolled from my back to my side, the bed didn’t “push back” quickly, but it also didn’t let my hips drift out of line. I spent a few nights reading on my laptop, and the foam kept a steady cradle without feeling wobbly. Marcus liked how muted movement felt, but he wanted a touch more pushback under the hips. Mia settled in fast on her side and stayed comfortable longer than I expected for a medium all-foam.
What we liked:
-
Very low motion transfer
-
Easy, even contour for back/side rotations
Who it is best for:
-
Guest rooms and partner-movement sensitivity
-
Light-to-average sleepers who prefer a medium feel
Where it falls short:
-
Softer perimeter when sitting at the edge
-
Less bounce for people who want quick rebound
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong motion isolation | Edge feels less stable for sitting |
| Comfortable medium balance | Slower repositioning than hybrids |
| Cooling-oriented cover feel | Heavier stomach sleepers may want firmer support |
Details
-
Price: $339 (Twin) to $669 (King/California King)
-
Thickness: 12"
-
Type: All-foam mattress
-
Feel: Medium (brand scale shows Medium 3/5)
-
Cooling indicator on product page: Cool 4/5
-
Cover: Tencel fabric cover
-
Comfort materials: Bamboo Charcoal AeroFusion memory foam; Adaptifoam
-
Support core: Flex Support Base Foam
-
Fire barrier: Fiberglass-free FR inner cover
-
Sizes shown: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, California King (plus Split King shown in size guide)
-
Shipping: Free shipping
-
Warranty: 10-year warranty
-
Trial period: -
-
Return policy: -
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.7 | Keeps a steady line for my back/side mix, but less lift than the hybrids. |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Noticeably cooler cover feel and fewer “warm spots” overnight. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.0 | Good joint comfort for side sleeping without an overly deep sink. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | Partner movement is highly muted across the surface. |
| Responsiveness | 3.5 | Takes a moment to “reset” after turning. |
| Edge Support | 3.2 | Usable, but sitting and shoe-tying at the edge feels softer. |
| Durability | 3.6 | Stable feel so far, but all-foam tends to show body impressions sooner than hybrids. |
| Overall | 3.8 | A comfortable, quiet medium foam option with clear strengths in motion control. |
WellFlex ICE 1.0 Firmer
Our Testing Experience
This one felt cooler right away, especially when my forearm brushed the surface as I settled in. The firmer top gave my hips a flatter platform when I started on my back, and it kept my lower back from “searching” for support. Marcus, who runs hot, kept coming back to it and liked how it stayed breathable for him, but he still noticed that classic foam “slow return” when he shifted quickly. Mia could sleep on her side here, but she preferred it with a slightly thicker pillow and shorter side-sleep stretches because the firmness made her shoulder feel more “held up” than “let in.”
What we liked:
-
Cool-to-the-touch feel and steady temperature overnight
-
Flatter, firmer support under hips and lower back
Who it is best for:
-
Hot sleepers who want firmer foam
-
Back/stomach sleepers who dislike deep contouring
Where it falls short:
-
Less forgiving for sensitive shoulders on long side-sleep runs
-
Edge has some compression when perched
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong cooling sensation at the surface | Too firm for many lightweight side sleepers |
| Supportive, level feel under hips | Foam responsiveness is moderate, not springy |
| Excellent motion isolation | Edge support is not hybrid-like |
Details
-
Price: $1,899 (Twin XL) to $2,999 (King/California King)
-
Thickness: 14"
-
Type: Memory foam
-
Feel (brand positioning): Firm
-
Cover: Enhanced Cooling Knit Fabric Cover with PCM-coated threads
-
Comfort materials: 1.5" Gel AeroFusion Memory Foam with ActiveTemp PCM; 1" BioBreeze Memory Foam
-
Transition layer: 2" Performance Memory Foam
-
Support core: 9.5" Flex Support Base Foam
-
Fire barrier: Fiberglass-free FR inner cover
-
Sizes shown: Twin XL, Queen, King, California King
-
Shipping: Free shipping
-
Warranty: 10-year warranty
-
Trial period: -
-
Return policy: -
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.3 | Firmer, flatter platform that kept my hips and lumbar area more level. |
| Cooling | 4.6 | Best surface cooling feel of the group, with fewer warm wake-ups. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.6 | Good overall, but firmer shoulder/hip relief for side sleepers. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.7 | Very little movement carries across the mattress. |
| Responsiveness | 3.4 | Turning is fine, but it’s still foam: slower than hybrids. |
| Edge Support | 3.4 | Better than some soft foams, but sitting compresses the edge. |
| Durability | 4.1 | Thick base and firmer build feel resilient under repeated nightly use. |
| Overall | 4.0 | A cooling-forward firm foam option that prioritizes stability over plushness. |
ChiroPro 1.0
Our Testing Experience
This mattress started the night feeling immediately “upright.” When I lay on my back, my lumbar area didn’t sag, and my hips felt centered instead of drifting down into foam. In the morning, when I sat on the edge to put on socks, it held shape better than either all-foam bed. Marcus loved the no-nonsense support and said it felt like the bed “stayed under him” even when he shifted. Jamal liked how easy it was to roll and reset without feeling stuck. The trade-off showed up for Mia: on her side, the extra-firm character made her shoulder feel like it needed more give, and she shifted positions more often.
What we liked:
-
Very stable support and strong edges
-
Easy repositioning with a spring-supported feel
Who it is best for:
-
Back and stomach sleepers who want an extra-firm feel
-
Heavier bodies needing strong hip support
Where it falls short:
-
Too firm for many lightweight side sleepers
-
Slightly more motion feedback than all-foam
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent support for hips and lumbar area | Limited pressure relief for petite side sleepers |
| Strong edge stability | More partner feel than all-foam |
| High responsiveness for turning | Extra-firm feel can feel “hard” initially |
Details
-
Price: $2,099 (Twin/Twin XL) to $3,199 (King/California King)
-
Thickness: 13"
-
Type: Hybrid (includes 3-zone individually pocketed springs)
-
Feel (brand positioning): Between extra-firm
-
Cover: Comfort Knit Fabric Cover
-
Comfort materials: 1.5" Gel AeroFusion Memory Foam
-
Transition/support foams: 1.5" Gentle Flex Foam; 1" Flex Comfort Foam; 1" Flex Support Base Foam
-
Coil system: 8" 3-zone individually pocketed springs with foam encasement
-
Fire barrier: Fiberglass-free FR inner cover
-
Sizes shown: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, California King
-
Shipping: Free shipping
-
Warranty: 10-year warranty
-
Trial period: -
-
Return policy: -
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.7 | The most “locked-in” spinal alignment feel of the four, especially on my back. |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Breathable surface feel and coil airflow helped prevent heat buildup. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.2 | Extra-firm profile limits shoulder/hip sink for side sleepers. |
| Motion Isolation | 3.9 | Better than many traditional innersprings, but not foam-level quiet. |
| Responsiveness | 4.4 | Easy turning and quick reset when switching positions. |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | Strong edge for sitting and sleeping near the perimeter. |
| Durability | 4.6 | Zoned coils + supportive foams feel built to resist sag over time. |
| Overall | 4.2 | A firm, structured hybrid built for stability, with clear trade-offs in softness. |
ChiroPro 3.0
Our Testing Experience
Compared with the 1.0, this felt like it gave me a cushion first and structure second, which made my side-sleep stretches noticeably easier. I could start on my side, roll to my back, and the bed felt consistent instead of “two different mattresses” depending on position. Jamal described it as the easiest hybrid of the four to turn on without losing comfort. Marcus still got the support he wanted, but he preferred the 1.0 when he slept more on his stomach. Mia had her best shoulder comfort of the hybrids here, and she said it felt like her outer hip settled in without dragging her spine out of level.
What we liked:
-
Best balance of contouring and support in the lineup
-
Responsive, easy position changes with cushioning
Who it is best for:
-
Mixed-position sleepers who need both relief and support
-
Side sleepers who still want a supportive core
Where it falls short:
-
Not as “dead quiet” as the foam models for partner movement
-
Plush feel may be too much for strict stomach sleepers
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong overall balance for most sleep styles | More motion feedback than all-foam beds |
| Very good pressure relief without losing structure | Plush feel can be too soft for some stomach sleepers |
| High edge stability and easy turning | Higher price tier |
Details
-
Price: $2,099 (Twin/Twin XL) to $3,199 (King/California King)
-
Thickness: 13"
-
Type: Hybrid (includes 3-zone individually pocketed springs)
-
Feel (brand positioning): Between medium
-
Cover: Comfort Knit Fabric Cover
-
Comfort materials: 1.5" Gel AeroFusion Memory Foam
-
Additional comfort foams: 1.5" Latex-like AdaptiFoam; 1" Liquid Gel CoolFlex foam
-
Coil system: 8" 3-zone individually pocketed springs with foam encasement
-
Base foam: 1" Flex Support Base Foam
-
Fire barrier: Fiberglass-free FR inner cover
-
Sizes shown: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, California King
-
Shipping: Free shipping
-
Warranty: 10-year warranty
-
Trial period: -
-
Return policy: -
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.5 | Strong core support that stayed consistent across back/side sleeping. |
| Cooling | 4.4 | Cooling foams plus coil airflow kept heat from pooling overnight. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Best shoulder/hip comfort of the four without losing alignment. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.1 | Noticeably controlled for a hybrid, though foam still wins overall. |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Smooth turning and quick reset, especially for combination sleepers. |
| Edge Support | 4.3 | Stable perimeter for sitting and sleeping near the edge. |
| Durability | 4.5 | Zoned coils and layered foams feel robust under repeated use. |
| Overall | 4.3 | The most broadly comfortable MLILY option in this set, with minimal compromises. |
Performance score comparison
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness | Edge Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MLILY Dream | 3.8 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.2 |
| WellFlex ICE 1.0 Firmer | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| ChiroPro 1.0 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| ChiroPro 3.0 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.3 |
The numbers line up with what you feel in real life: foam wins on motion isolation, hybrids win on edge support and ease of movement. ChiroPro 3.0 is the most even performer, while ChiroPro 1.0 is the clear pick for maximum support. WellFlex ICE 1.0 leads on cooling feel, and Dream is the value-leaning option that still performs well in pressure relief and motion control.
Picking the right MLILY mattress
Start with sleep position and body weight: side sleepers generally benefit from more pressure relief (Dream or ChiroPro 3.0), while back/stomach sleepers often do better with firmer hip support (WellFlex ICE 1.0 or ChiroPro 1.0). Hot sleepers should prioritize the ICE surface feel and cooling materials (WellFlex ICE 1.0). For partner movement sensitivity, choose Dream or WellFlex ICE 1.0 for the quietest motion performance. If you want the most “do-it-all” balance, ChiroPro 3.0 is the safest bet.
Limitations to keep in mind
These models lean into cooling and support, but the trade-offs are real: the firmest builds (ChiroPro 1.0 and WellFlex ICE 1.0) can feel too unyielding for lightweight side sleepers with sensitive shoulders. The foam models (Dream and WellFlex ICE 1.0) don’t match the hybrids for edge stability when sitting or sleeping near the perimeter. If you want a very springy, buoyant surface, neither all-foam option will feel as lively as the hybrids.
MLILY vs alternatives
Why choose MLILY here: cooling-focused materials; a clear split between motion-isolating foam and responsive hybrid designs; and strong edge/support performance on the ChiroPro hybrids. For a more traditional luxury innerspring feel with strong edge support and zoned lumbar coils, Saatva Classic is a direct alternative. For hot sleepers who want a cooling cover plus a hybrid airflow design and multiple firmness options, Brooklyn Bedding Aurora Luxe is another strong contender.
Pro tips for MLILY owners
-
Give the foams a short “settling” period with regular sleep before judging pressure relief.
-
If you side-sleep and choose a firmer model, adjust pillow height first before assuming the mattress is the issue.
-
Use a breathable mattress protector if cooling is a priority; thick, waterproof protectors can blunt surface cooling.
-
For the hybrids, rotate the mattress (if your model allows) to distribute wear more evenly over time.
-
If you perch on the edge daily to dress, favor the ChiroPro hybrids for long-term edge stability.
-
If you feel “stuck” in foam, use a slightly more elastic fitted sheet and avoid overly tight toppers.
-
Pair firmer mattresses with slightly softer pillows to reduce perceived shoulder pressure.
-
Keep bedroom temperature and humidity stable when comparing cooling performance night to night.
-
For couples, prioritize motion isolation first, then edge support second, based on how you share the bed.
-
If you alternate between back and side sleeping, choose the model with the most balanced pressure relief/support (typically ChiroPro 3.0 in this set).
FAQs
Q: Which MLILY mattress felt coolest at the surface?
A: WellFlex ICE 1.0 had the most immediate cool-to-the-touch sensation and stayed cooler overnight.
Q: Which model is best for side sleepers with shoulder sensitivity?
A: ChiroPro 3.0 delivered the most consistent shoulder and outer-hip relief in our testing.
Q: Which one isolates partner movement the most?
A: The all-foam models, especially WellFlex ICE 1.0 and Dream, kept motion transfer lowest.
Q: Which one is easiest to move on?
A: The hybrids, with ChiroPro 1.0 and 3.0 feeling quickest to turn and reset.