We narrowed it to five Eastman House models we found at Mattress Ranch—Yukon, Tanana, Susitna, Nenana, and Chena. All are coil-based hybrids with layered foams, and Chena is positioned as the latex-leaning option. Here’s how each one felt, where it fits, and what to watch for.
- Product Overview
- Testing Team Takeaways
- Eastman Mattress Comparison Chart
- What We Tested and How We Tested It
- Eastman Mattress: Our Testing Experience
- Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
- Best Picks
- How to Choose the Eastman Mattress
- Limitations
- Policies at a Glance
- FAQs: Eastman Mattress
- Related Post
Product Overview
| Mattress | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price | Overall Score |
| Eastman House Yukon | Steady support, balanced contouring, sturdy edges | Can feel firm to very light side sleepers | Back sleepers and combo sleepers who want a flatter surface | $$ mid-range at local retailers | 4.4 / 5 |
| Eastman House Tanana | Plusher top with coil support; strong shoulder relief | May sink too much for heavy stomach sleepers | Side sleepers and combo sleepers who like a softer feel | $$–$$$ mid to upper-mid | 4.3 / 5 |
| Eastman House Susitna | Deep euro-top cushioning; best pressure relief feel | Not ideal for heavier stomach sleepers | Lighter/average side sleepers who want plush comfort | $$–$$$ | 4.2 / 5 |
| Eastman House Nenana | Straightforward hybrid feel; good value for a coil bed | Basic cooling; thinner comfort feel than plush models | Guest rooms and budget shoppers who still want coils | $$ value-leaning | 4.2 / 5 |
| Eastman House Chena | Buoyant, cooler feel; strong lift from coils | More bounce than foam-heavy options | Hot sleepers, combo sleepers, and heavier bodies | $$$ upper-mid range | 4.5 / 5 |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the five models, the big differences came down to how much cushion you feel before you reach the coil support. Yukon and Chena stayed the most supportive and easiest to move on. Tanana and Susitna leaned softer—especially Susitna, which has the deepest, euro-top style cradle. Nenana felt like the pared-back option that still covers the basics.
In my own nightly rotation, Yukon was the easiest one to trust for alignment. It kept my lower back level without feeling board-like, and the edges felt stable when I slept near the perimeter. Marcus (our heavier tester) came away with a similar view—he felt the most consistent hip and midsection support on Yukon and Chena, and he also reported his coolest nights on Chena.
Mia, who is lighter and pressure-sensitive on her side, favored Tanana for shoulder comfort and used Susitna when she wanted the plushest surface. In couple testing, Jenna and Ethan found Tanana and Susitna the most muted for partner movement, while Chena was the bounciest but also the quickest to respond when changing positions.
Eastman Mattress Comparison Chart
| Mattress | Firmness (approx) | Type | Approx Height | Key Materials | Cooling Performance | Support | Pressure Relief | Responsiveness | Motion Isolation | Durability (expected) |
| Yukon | Medium-firm | Hybrid (foam over pocketed coils) | Approx. 12–13" | Quilted cover, comfort foams, pocketed coils | 4 / 5 | 4.7 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 |
| Tanana | Medium | Plush hybrid (deeper comfort stack) | Approx. 13–14" | Plush quilt, comfort foams, pocketed coils | 3.9 / 5 | 4.4 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 |
| Susitna | Medium-plush | Euro-top hybrid | Approx. 13–14" | Euro-top, pressure-relief foams, pocketed coils | 3.8 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 | 4.7 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Nenana | Medium | Simpler hybrid | Approx. 12" | Quilted cover, comfort foams, pocketed coils | 3.7 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 | 4.1 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 |
| Chena | Medium-firm | Latex hybrid | Approx. 12–13" | Quilted cover, latex layer, comfort foam, pocketed coils | 4.6 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 | 4.3 / 5 | 4.7 / 5 | 4.0 / 5 | 4.6 / 5 |
What We Tested and How We Tested It
We evaluated these Eastman House hybrids using our standard mattress testing routine: multiple sleepers, repeatable checks, and notes taken in the same positions across several nights.
For pressure relief, we used a pressure-mapping pad under a thin sheet and compared readings in back and side positions. At the same time, we checked mattress firmness, spinal alignment, and support with side-view photos to see whether hips and shoulders stayed level.
To gauge motion isolation and responsiveness, Jenna stayed still while Ethan got in and out, changed positions, and ran a few controlled movement tests. We paired their feedback with a small accelerometer and also scored edge support with repeated sit and lie-near-edge checks.
Cooling and breathability came from surface-temperature readings taken after a fixed warm-up period, plus overnight notes on heat buildup. For durability signals, we reviewed construction and ran repeated compression cycles with a weighted roller to see how the surface held up over time.
Eastman Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Eastman House Yukon
Our Testing Experience
Yukon ended up as our baseline in this lineup. It’s medium-firm and feels more support-first than plush: you compress through the quilt and comfort foams, then the pocketed coils hold you up before you sink too far.
On my back, it kept my hips level and gave my lower back steady contact, which is why I kept returning to it during the workweek. Marcus, who needs more midsection support, also preferred Yukon for back and stomach time because it resisted sagging under his hips.
On my side, it offered light contouring but less cradle than Tanana or Susitna. The edge felt secure for sitting and for sleeping near the perimeter, and partner movement was noticeable but reasonably muted for a coil hybrid.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Even, stable support for back and combo sleepers | Can feel firm to very light side sleepers |
| Secure edge for sitting and sleeping near the perimeter | Less plush than Tanana or Susitna |
| Responsive feel that’s easy to move on | Cooling relies more on airflow than specialty foams |
Details
- Type: Hybrid (foam over pocketed coils)
- Firmness: Medium-firm in our testing
- Approx. height: Around 12–13 inches (varies by retailer build)
- Feel: Flatter, supportive surface with light contouring
- Support core: Pocketed coil system with a stable edge feel
- Cooling: Coil airflow + breathable cover (no heavy heat-trapping feel in our tests)
- Motion isolation: Moderate-to-good for a coil hybrid
- Best for: Back sleepers, combo sleepers, and heavier bodies needing steadier lift
Eastman House Tanana
Our Testing Experience
Tanana is the comfort-leaning hybrid of the group. The surface feels plusher than Yukon and lets your shoulders settle in more before the coil support catches you.
Mia, our lighter side sleeper, consistently picked Tanana because it eased shoulder pressure without throwing her out of alignment. I had a similar experience—more cushion on my side, while still feeling supported underneath.
Marcus felt fine on his back, but on longer stomach stretches he noticed more hip sink than he prefers. In couple testing, Tanana did a nice job damping movement compared with the springier Chena, though the seat edge felt softer when sitting.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Plusher surface that cushions shoulders well | May dip too much for heavy stomach sleepers |
| Good motion isolation for a coil hybrid | Seat edge compresses more than Yukon or Chena |
| Supportive enough to avoid a “stuck” feel | Not the coolest-feeling option in this set |
Details
- Type: Plush hybrid (deeper comfort stack over pocketed coils)
- Firmness: Medium in our testing
- Approx. height: Around 13–14 inches (varies by retailer build)
- Feel: Softer landing with a deeper side-sleep cradle than Yukon
- Support core: Pocketed coils that keep the bed from feeling overly soft
- Cooling: Average—comfortable, but not as airy as the latex-forward option
- Motion isolation: Good; one of the quieter-feeling models in couple testing
- Best for: Side sleepers and combo sleepers who want more cushion than a medium-firm bed
Eastman House Susitna
Our Testing Experience
Susitna is the plushest option in the five. The euro-top compresses deeper than Tanana and gives a more pillowy first impression.
For side sleeping, it delivered the most pressure relief in our group—useful if your shoulders and hips need a softer landing. The trade-off is a slower, less buoyant response when you change positions.
Marcus felt his hips drift more than he likes on his stomach, and the edge compressed more when sitting. For couples, it absorbed movement well, landing close to Tanana on our partner-disturbance notes.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Deep euro-top cushion with strong pressure-relief feel | Too soft for heavier stomach sleepers |
| Muted surface feel for partner movement | Slower response when changing positions |
| Comfortable for lighter side sleepers | Edge compresses more when sitting |
Details
- Type: Euro-top hybrid
- Firmness: Medium-plush in our testing
- Approx. height: Around 13–14 inches (varies by retailer build)
- Feel: Plush, cradling surface with the deepest sink of the group
- Support core: Pocketed coils under a thicker comfort stack
- Cooling: Slightly below average; thicker foams hold a bit more warmth
- Motion isolation: Good; absorbs movement better than the bouncier options
- Best for: Lighter or average side sleepers who want a plush feel more than a “flat” surface
Eastman House Nenana
Our Testing Experience
Nenana felt like the straightforward, no-frills hybrid in the lineup. You reach the coil support sooner, so the surface stays more neutral and less plush.
That simpler build made it easy to move on and fairly stable for back sleeping. On my side, it didn’t cushion as deeply as Tanana or Susitna, which is the main reason pressure-sensitive side sleepers may want to step up.
In couple testing, we noticed a bit more partner motion than on the plush models, but it wasn’t disruptive, and the perimeter held up better than we expected for a value-leaning option.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Value-leaning hybrid feel without feeling flimsy | Less cushioning for strict side sleepers |
| Easy to move on; balanced medium feel | Cooling features are basic |
| Better-than-expected edge stability for the tier | More partner motion than Tanana or Susitna |
Details
- Type: Simpler hybrid (comfort foams over pocketed coils)
- Firmness: Medium in our testing
- Approx. height: Around 12 inches (varies by retailer build)
- Feel: More direct support with less top-of-bed plushness
- Support core: Pocketed coils; stable, predictable pushback
- Cooling: Basic; relies on coil airflow and cover materials
- Motion isolation: Fair-to-good; improved if you prefer a firmer surface
- Best for: Budget-minded shoppers, guest rooms, and sleepers who don’t need a deep cradle
Eastman House Chena
Our Testing Experience
Chena is the outlier in feel. It has a noticeably springier, faster pushback than the foam-heavier beds, and shifting positions is almost effortless.
Marcus logged his coolest nights on Chena and felt the best midsection lift on his back and stomach. I also liked it for combination sleeping because it never felt like I was climbing out of a soft top layer.
Mia thought the pressure relief was solid but not as plush as Tanana or Susitna. For couples, Chena was the bounciest of the group—great for ease of movement, but you’ll feel more surface activity than on Tanana or Susitna.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
| Cooler, buoyant latex-hybrid feel | Bouncier surface than foam-heavy models |
| Strong support with fast responsiveness | Not as plush for shoulder pressure as Tanana or Susitna |
| Easiest model to move around on | Typically priced higher than the others |
Details
- Type: Latex hybrid
- Firmness: Medium-firm in our testing
- Approx. height: Around 12–13 inches (varies by retailer build)
- Feel: Buoyant, springy surface with quick pushback
- Comfort system: Latex-forward layer plus additional comfort foam
- Support core: Pocketed coils; strong lift under hips and torso
- Cooling: Best in this group; airflow + less heat-trapping feel in our tests
- Best for: Hot sleepers, combination sleepers, and heavier bodies that need extra lift
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
| Eastman House Yukon | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Eastman House Tanana | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| Eastman House Susitna | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.0 |
| Eastman House Nenana | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.1 |
| Eastman House Chena | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 4.7 |
Chena scored highest overall thanks to its strong support and cooling. Yukon followed closely for steady alignment. Tanana and Susitna led the group on pressure relief, while Nenana held its own with a simpler, value-leaning feel.
Best Picks
These were the standouts from our scoring and nightly test notes.
- Best for hot sleepers: Eastman House Chena — It stayed the coolest in our rotation and felt the easiest to move on.
- Best for side sleepers: Eastman House Tanana — It balanced shoulder cushioning with enough support to keep alignment steady.
- Best value: Eastman House Nenana — A straightforward coil hybrid that covers the basics without a premium price tier.
How to Choose the Eastman Mattress?
Start with your sleeping position and how sensitive you are to pressure at your shoulders and hips. In this lineup, the feel ranges from plush (Susitna) to medium-firm (Yukon and Chena).
If you’re a side sleeper—especially lighter or pressure-sensitive—Tanana was the best blend of cushion and support in our tests. If you want a deeper cradle, Susitna is the plush upgrade.
Back and combination sleepers tended to do best on Yukon, which stayed flatter and more supportive through the night. If you spend meaningful time on your stomach or carry more weight, Chena also kept hips from drifting thanks to its quicker, springier support.
If you sleep hot or change positions often, Chena’s buoyant feel and airflow stood out. For couples, Tanana and Susitna were the calmest for motion, while Yukon and Chena felt the most stable at the edge.
Limitations
These Eastman House models are primarily sold through regional retailers, so selection, pricing, and policy details can vary by location. In-store testing matters more here than with a single national direct-to-consumer mattress.
If you want a very slow, deep memory-foam “hug,” none of these felt like that—especially Chena, which is the most buoyant. If you prefer a very thin, old-school innerspring with lots of bounce, the thicker comfort layers on these hybrids may feel more modern than you want.
Nenana is the value option in this set, but the lineup overall tends to sit in the mid-range to upper-mid range at many stores. If price is your only priority, you may find cheaper entry-level beds outside this collection.
Policies at a Glance
| Mattress | Shipping (cost and region) | Trial Period | Return Policy / Fees | Warranty Length | Notable Conditions |
| Yukon | Local retailer delivery in markets where it’s sold; fees vary | Comfort-exchange/trial terms vary by store | Often exchange-focused rather than full refunds; fees may apply | Typically around 10 years (confirm with retailer paperwork) | Usually requires a stain-free mattress with tags attached; protector and proper base may be required |
| Tanana | Local retailer delivery; setup/haul-away may be optional | Retailer-dependent comfort-exchange window | Usually one exchange; refund policies vary | Often around 10 years (confirm details in writing) | Impression/comfort claims depend on store and manufacturer criteria; protectors are common |
| Susitna | Local retailer delivery; fees vary by region | Retailer comfort-exchange terms vary | Exchange programs may include fees for plush models | Often around 10 years (confirm details in writing) | Rotation and support requirements may be stricter on plush tops |
| Nenana | Local retailer delivery; value bundles sometimes reduce fees | Retailer-dependent exchange window | Exchanges are more common than refunds; fees vary | Usually around 10 years (confirm with retailer paperwork) | Protectors are common; comfort preference isn’t a warranty claim |
| Chena | Local retailer delivery; haul-away may be offered | Comfort-exchange terms vary by store | Exchange-focused policies; fees may apply | Often around 10 years (confirm with retailer paperwork) | Proper foundation/center support requirements can matter for coverage |
Because these mattresses are sold through local retailers, policy details can vary by location. Use the table as a starting point, then confirm the exact exchange, return, and warranty terms in writing before you buy.
FAQs
1. Are Eastman mattresses good for back pain?
In our tests, the most back-friendly options were Yukon and Chena because they stayed flatter and kept hips from sinking. If your back pain is aggravated by softness, start there.
2. Which Eastman Mattress is best for side sleepers?
Tanana was the best all-around side-sleeper pick, especially for lighter or pressure-sensitive shoulders. If you want the plushest cradle, Susitna is the softer alternative.
3. Do Eastman mattresses sleep hot?
None of these felt unbearably hot, but the thick euro-top on Susitna held more warmth than the others. Chena slept the coolest for our testers.
4. How firm are Eastman mattresses?
The range runs from medium-plush (Susitna) to medium-firm (Yukon and Chena), with Tanana and Nenana landing closer to medium in our hands-on checks.
5. Are Eastman mattresses good for couples?
For couples, Tanana and Susitna muted movement the best. Chena is easier to move on but has more bounce, so you’ll notice more surface activity.
6. How long will an Eastman Mattress last?
Longevity depends on the exact build and how well it’s supported, but these coil hybrids scored in the “solid” range in our durability expectations. Rotate and support the mattress properly to help it last.
7. Can heavier sleepers use these Eastman mattresses?
Yes, but model choice matters. Our heavier tester did best on Yukon and Chena for midsection support; Susitna felt too soft for long stomach-sleep stretches.
8. Which Eastman Mattress has the best edge support?
Yukon had the most consistent edge feel in our tests, with Chena close behind. The plusher tops (especially Susitna) compressed more when sitting.
9. Are Eastman mattresses easy to move on?
Chena was the easiest to move on thanks to its springier feel. Yukon and Nenana were also easy to reposition on, while Susitna was the slowest to respond.
10. Where can I buy an Eastman Mattress?
These models are typically sold through regional retailers rather than shipped nationwide. We tested versions available at Mattress Ranch, but availability can vary by location.
