Zorora Sofa Reviews: Cloud, L-Shape, and U-Shape Tested

I have always been intrigued by the promise of affordable, stylish comfort. When my team and I decided to bring the Zorora sofa lineup into our testing facility, I had questions. I wanted to know if their modular designs could withstand real daily life. We ordered ten of their most prominent configurations. The goal was simple. We needed to see past the vibrant marketing images. We wanted to feel the fabric and test the frames ourselves.

My team includes a diverse mix of people. Marcus is our heavy lifter who tests frame strength. Mia brings a petite perspective to seat depth. Jenna and Ethan test for couples. We also have Dr. Adrian Walker on site. He provides clinical insights into posture and ergonomics. We did not treat these sofas gently. We jumped on them. We spilled coffee on them. We assembled them from the boxes to test the ease of setup. We spent weeks rotating through each model.

The process was exhaustive. We focused heavily on the "sofa-in-a-box" experience that Zorora offers. We timed our assembly. We scrutinized the foam density. We measured exactly how much the cushions compressed after hours of sitting. We wanted to see if the tool-free assembly resulted in wobbly furniture. What follows is a detailed account of every squeak, sink, and nap we experienced. We want you to know exactly what you are getting before you click buy.

Product Overview

Sofa Model	Pros	Cons	Ideal For	Price	Overall Score
Classic 3-Seater	Easy assembly, solid frame	Cushions feel stiff initially	Small apartments	Low-Med	4.2
L-Shape Sectional	Good corner support, spacious	Fabric can trap heat	Family movie nights	Med	4.5
U-Shape Grand	Massive seating capacity	Takes up huge floor space	Large families, hosting	High	4.6
Cloud Modular	Plush, sink-in comfort	Requires constant fluffing	Napping, lounging	Med-High	4.4
2-Seater Studio	Compact, fits anywhere	Too narrow for napping	Home offices, studios	Low	4.1
Velvet Chesterfield	Stylish, soft texture	Buttons can be uncomfortable	Formal living areas	Med	4.3
Modern Corner	Clean lines, firm support	Low back offers poor neck support	Minimalist spaces	Med	4.2
Deep-Seat Lounger	Excellent legroom	Hard to get out of	Tall users, relaxing	Med	4.5
Sleeper Hybrid	Versatile dual-use	Mattress layer is thin	Guest rooms	Med	4.0
4-Seater Straight	Long seating area	Middle seat feels rigid	Open plan layouts	Med	4.3

Zorora Sofas Comparison Chart

Feature	Classic 3-Seater	L-Shape	U-Shape Grand	Cloud Modular	2-Seater Studio	Velvet Chesterfield	Modern Corner	Deep-Seat Lounger	Sleeper Hybrid	4-Seater Straight
Seat Depth	22" (Standard)	24" (Avg)	24" (Avg)	28" (Deep)	21" (Shallow)	23" (Avg)	22" (Standard)	29" (Extra Deep)	23" (Avg)	24" (Avg)
Seat Height	18"	17.5"	17.5"	16.5" (Low)	18"	18"	17"	16" (Low)	18"	17.5"
Firmness	Firm	Medium-Firm	Medium	Soft	Firm	Medium-Firm	Firm	Soft-Medium	Firm	Medium
Assembly	Tool-free	Tool-free	Minimal tools	Tool-free	Tool-free	Screw-in legs	Connectors	Connectors	Complex	Tool-free
Back Style	Loose Cushion	Loose Cushion	Loose Cushion	Pillow Back	Tight Back	Tufted/Tight	Low Profile	Pillow Back	Fold-down	Loose Cushion
Fabric	Woven Poly	Microfiber	Woven Poly	Performance	Woven Poly	Velvet	Linen Blend	Chenille	Woven Poly	Woven Poly
Modular?	No	Yes	Yes	Yes	No	No	Yes	Yes	No	Yes

What We Tested and How We Tested It

We established a rigorous testing protocol for these Zorora sofas. We knew that modular, boxed furniture often suffers from stability issues. We started by timing the assembly process. We measured how long it took two people to go from box to sitting. We checked for unclear instructions. We looked for misaligned holes. We noted if the parts clicked together securely or if they wobbled.

We then moved to the "daily life" simulation. I sat on each sofa for two hours straight while working. I checked for lower back fatigue. Marcus and Jamal performed the "drop test." They sat down abruptly to test the suspension. We measured the foam recovery time. We wanted to see if the cushions retained their shape or stayed indented. We also had Jenna and Ethan simulate a movie night. They checked for crowding. They assessed the comfort of the corner seats.

We evaluated the fabrics under stress. We rubbed denim swatches against the upholstery to check for dye transfer. We allowed our office dog (supervised) to jump up to test snag resistance. We poured small amounts of water to test absorption rates. Dr. Adrian Walker observed our postures throughout. He noted spinal alignment in different positions. He pointed out ergonomic risks for different body types. We combined these hands-on experiences with technical measurements to form our final scores.

Testing Team Takeaways

I found the Zorora experience to be surprisingly robust. The assembly was generally straightforward. However, my lower back noticed the firmness of the standard foam. The Classic 3-Seater felt stiff at first. I had to use a lumbar pillow on the deeper models like the Cloud. I appreciated the modularity. It allowed us to configure the room easily. I did notice some fabric bunching on the looser cushions after a week of use.

Marcus was impressed by the frame rigidity. I expected this to wobble like a card table, he admitted. He found the interlocking brackets held tight. He did have issues with heat on the L-Shape. The microfiber fabric trapped his body heat during long gaming sessions. He preferred the woven fabrics for breathability. He also noted that the armrests on the Studio model felt a bit flimsy when he leaned his full weight on them.

Carlos focused on the work-from-home potential. He loved the firm support of the Modern Corner. I can actually type here without slumping, he said. He found the back cushions on the U-Shape to be supportive enough for his neck. He disliked the Deep-Seat Lounger for work. He felt it pitched him too far back. He couldn't reach his coffee table easily from that position.

Mia struggled with the scale of the larger pieces. The Deep-Seat Lounger swallowed her whole. My feet are dangling in mid-air, she laughed. She gravitated toward the 2-Seater Studio and the Classic 3-Seater. The shallower seat depth allowed her knees to bend naturally. She loved the velvet texture on the Chesterfield. She found it soft against her skin during her reading sessions.

Jenna and Ethan tested the "cuddle factor." They found the U-Shape Grand to be the winner. We have our own zip codes on this thing, Ethan joked. They liked the ability to spread out. They noted that the connection points between modules could sometimes be felt through the cushions. This was a minor annoyance during naps. They appreciated the stain resistance when they spilled a little soda on the L-Shape.

Jamal had mixed feelings about the seat height. The Cloud Modular sat too low for him. Getting up is a leg workout, he commented. He preferred the standard height of the Classic 3-Seater. He liked the legroom on the L-Shape chaise. He could stretch his legs fully without hanging off the edge. He found the firmness of the sleeper hybrid to be good for his back after the gym.

Zorora Sofa Reviews: Our Testing Experience

1. Classic 3-Seater

Our Testing Experience:

I approached the Classic 3-Seater with moderate expectations. It is the bread and butter of the line. I unboxed it and clicked the arms into the base. It took fifteen minutes. I sat down. The foam felt firm. It pushed back against me. I liked the initial support. I sat there for an hour watching news. I felt upright and alert. It is not a sink-in couch.

Marcus sat down heavily. Solid landing, he noted. He bounced a little. The springs absorbed his weight well. He leaned against the armrest. It felt sturdy. He liked the height of the back cushions. They hit him right at the shoulders. He didn't feel like he was slouching.

Mia tried to curl up. She found the seat depth perfect for her legs. I don't need a pillow behind me, she said. She liked the fabric texture. It felt durable. Dr. Walker observed our posture. He noted that the firm seat prevents the pelvis from tilting backward. This is a safe choice for chronic back pain sufferers, he added.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Easy tool-free assembly	Seat cushions are very firm
Compact footprint	Armrests have thin padding
Excellent back support	Fabric feels slightly rough
Sturdy frame construction	Limited color options

Details

• Price: Low-Medium

• Width: 85 inches

• Seat Depth: 22 inches

• Seat Height: 18 inches

• Fabric: Durable Woven Polyester

• Assembly: 15 minutes (2 people)

• Warranty: 2 years on frame

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	4.0	Firm, supportive, not plush.
Support	4.5	Excellent upright posture maintenance.
Design	4.0	Simple, clean, functional.
Durability	4.4	Fabric and frame feel tough.
Overall	4.2	A solid starter sofa for apartments.

2. L-Shape Sectional

Our Testing Experience:

The L-Shape is designed for lounging. I connected the chaise to the main body. The brackets slid in easily. I claimed the corner spot. It felt spacious. The cushions here seemed slightly softer than the 3-seater. I stretched my legs out. I felt relaxed. I watched a whole movie. I didn't feel the need to shift much.

Jamal tested the chaise length. He lay back. My heels are actually on the cushion, he said. He was impressed. He sat up and checked the back support. He found the corner cushion provided good lumbar support. He liked that the chaise could be moved to either side.

Jenna and Ethan piled onto it. They fit comfortably side by side. I don't feel him moving, Jenna said. The separate seat cushions isolate motion well. They noted that the fabric warmed up a bit. Ethan said his back felt sweaty after an hour.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Reversible chaise configuration	Fabric traps body heat
Good motion isolation	Back cushions can sag
Generous legroom	Connector brackets are visible
Easy to clean	Chaise cushion slides forward

Details

• Price: Medium

• Configuration: Reversible Chaise

• Seat Depth: 24 inches

• Seat Height: 17.5 inches

• Fabric: Soft Microfiber blend

• Fill: High-density foam

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	4.6	Great for lounging and movies.
Support	4.3	Good, but back cushions soften.
Design	4.5	Versatile and modern.
Durability	4.4	Fabric stands up to use.
Overall	4.5	Perfect for family rooms.

3. U-Shape Grand

Our Testing Experience:

This thing is a beast. We needed three people to assemble it quickly. I sat in the middle "pit" area. I felt like a king. I could reach out and touch armrests on both sides. It is perfect for conversation. I hosted a team meeting on it. Everyone had space. No one was touching knees.

Marcus tested the frame stability across the span. He walked on the cushions (shoes off). It feels uniform, he said. He didn't feel any weak spots between modules. He liked the social aspect. He could face Carlos comfortably.

Carlos brought his laptop. He used the ottoman section as a desk. It works, he said. He found the corner seats best for working. He could wedge himself in. Dr. Walker pointed out that the U-shape encourages social interaction. This layout reduces neck strain during conversation, he noted.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Massive seating capacity	Requires large floor space
Great for social gatherings	Many boxes to unpack
Consistent comfort across seats	Middle seats have no arms
Modular flexibility	Expensive to ship

Details

• Price: High

• Shape: U-Shape

• Seat Depth: 24 inches

• Seat Height: 17.5 inches

• Capacity: 6-8 people

• Assembly: 45 minutes

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	4.7	Everyone has a good seat.
Support	4.5	Consistent foam density.
Design	4.8	Impressive focal point.
Durability	4.5	Solid connectors hold it together.
Overall	4.6	The ultimate hosting sofa.

4. Cloud Modular

Our Testing Experience:

I expected a sinking feeling, and I got it. The Cloud lives up to its name. I sat down and the air hissed out of the cushions. It felt luxurious. I lay down for a twenty-minute nap. It was heavenly. However, when I tried to sit up to drink water, I struggled. It offers zero resistance.

Mia loved this one. It hugs me, she said. She curled up in a ball. She felt secure. She didn't mind the lack of structure. She said it was her favorite for reading. She noted the fabric was very soft to the touch.

Jamal found it frustrating. My knees are higher than my hips, he complained. The low seat height combined with the deep sink made it hard for him. He said he wouldn't want this for a main sitting area. He also noted the cushions looked messy. We have to fluff this every time we stand up, he observed.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Incredible sink-in comfort	Requires constant fluffing
Very soft performance fabric	Hard to stand up from
Deep seats for napping	Low seat height
Modular layout	Poor ergonomic support

Details

• Price: Medium-High

• Seat Depth: 28 inches

• Seat Height: 16.5 inches

• Fill: Down-alternative blend

• Style: Low-profile lounge

• Maintenance: Frequent fluffing

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	4.8	Amazing for relaxation.
Support	3.5	Minimal structural support.
Design	4.5	Trendy, relaxed aesthetic.
Durability	4.0	Fill may compress over time.
Overall	4.4	Best for dedicated lounging spaces.

5. 2-Seater Studio

Our Testing Experience:

This is the cute sibling. I set it up in a corner. It fits anywhere. I sat down. It is intimate. The seat is narrower than the others. I felt efficient. It is perfect for a waiting room or a small den. I wouldn't want to watch a three-hour movie here. The padding is thinner.

Carlos liked it for his home office. It doesn't distract me, he said. He could sit and read a report. He liked the upright back. He said it kept him focused. He found the armrests a bit hard, though. He couldn't lean his elbow on them for long.

Marcus tried to lie down. It was comical. My legs are hanging off from the knees down, he laughed. He said it is definitely a sitter, not a sleeper. He shook the frame. It was surprisingly rigid for its size. Dr. Walker agreed it is good for short-term sitting. The shallow depth fits shorter thighs well, he noted.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Fits in tiny spaces	Not suitable for lounging
Firm, alert posture	Thin padding on arms
Very affordable	Too short for napping
Sturdy construction	Limited depth

Details

• Price: Low

• Width: 60 inches

• Seat Depth: 21 inches

• Seat Height: 18 inches

• Use: Small space / Office

• Assembly: 10 minutes

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	3.8	Functional, not cozy.
Support	4.4	Good for upright sitting.
Design	4.2	Smart, compact design.
Durability	4.2	Simple build lasts.
Overall	4.1	Ideal for studios and offices.

6. Velvet Chesterfield

Our Testing Experience:

This sofa has attitude. I ran my hand over the velvet. It felt smooth. I sat down. The tufting adds firmness. The back is lower than the standard sofas. I couldn't rest my head back. I had to sit with my arm along the top. It made me feel sophisticated. It is a social sofa.

Mia adored the look. This makes the room pop, she said. She liked the tactile experience. She found the single bench cushion comfortable. She didn't fall into cracks. However, she noted the buttons on the back. If you lean back hard, you feel them, she said.

Ethan and Jenna sat for a drink. They liked the vibe. It feels like a hotel bar, Ethan said. They found the seat depth adequate. They noted the velvet attracted some dust. Jenna had to use a lint roller after our dog walked by. Dr. Walker noted the low back offers no cervical support.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Stunning visual impact	Low back offers no headrest
Soft, luxurious velvet	Velvet attracts pet hair
Firm, consistent seat	Tufted buttons can be hard
Classic design style	Requires lint rolling

Details

• Price: Medium

• Style: Chesterfield

• Fabric: Polyester Velvet

• Seat Depth: 23 inches

• Seat Height: 18 inches

• Legs: Turned wood

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	4.0	Style over deep comfort.
Support	4.2	Firm back and seat.
Design	5.0	Beautiful statement piece.
Durability	4.0	Velvet needs care.
Overall	4.3	For style-conscious buyers.

7. Modern Corner

Our Testing Experience:

The Modern Corner is all about lines. I sat in the corner seat. It is boxy. The support is very structured. I felt securely wedged in. The armrests are wide and flat. I could balance my notebook on them. I liked the clean look. It made the room feel tidy.

Carlos chose this for his work test. The flat arms are great for a mousepad, he joked. He sat there for two hours. He said his back felt fine. The cushions are dense foam. They don't sag. He liked the modern aesthetic.

Marcus found it a bit rigid. It feels like an office lobby, he said. He wanted more softness. He tried to lie down. The armrests were too high and hard for a pillow. He had to fetch a throw pillow. He said the frame felt very strong. He sat on the backrest (not recommended) and it held.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
sleek, modern aesthetic	Very firm cushioning
Wide, functional arms	Hard edges
Excellent corner support	Not cozy for napping
Durable fabric	High arms make lying down hard

Details

• Price: Medium

• Style: Modern / Boxy

• Seat Depth: 22 inches

• Seat Height: 17 inches

• Firmness: Firm

• Assembly: Modular connectors

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	4.0	Structured and firm.
Support	4.5	Excellent foam density.
Design	4.5	Very clean and sharp.
Durability	4.5	Holds shape well.
Overall	4.2	Great for modern, minimalist homes.

8. Deep-Seat Lounger

Our Testing Experience:

This is for the tall people. I sat all the way back. My feet barely touched the ground. I felt small. I pulled my legs up. It is a nest. I grabbed a blanket. I could stay here all day. It is wider than the other models. I felt like I had personal space even with others sitting there.

Jamal was in heaven. Finally, he said. He sat back and his thighs were fully supported. He didn't feel like he was perched on a ledge. He loved the depth. He said it relaxed his hips. He stretched his arms out. The sofa accommodated his wingspan.

Mia struggled. I need a ladder, she joked. She had to pile pillows behind her to sit normally. She said it was comfortable if she treated it like a bed. But for sitting and drinking tea, it was too big. Dr. Walker warned that shorter users might slouch to find back support.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Amazing for tall users	Swallows petite users
Deep, relaxing seat	Takes up more depth in room
Soft, inviting fill	Hard to exit gracefully
Great for napping	Back support requires pillows

Details

• Price: Medium

• Seat Depth: 29 inches

• Seat Height: 16 inches

• Fabric: Chenille Texture

• Fill: Soft Foam Blend

• Target: Loungers

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	4.8	If you are tall or lounging.
Support	4.0	Depends on body size.
Design	4.4	Inviting and plush.
Durability	4.3	Fabric is cozy but tough.
Overall	4.5	The best pick for tall households.

9. Sleeper Hybrid

Our Testing Experience:

The Sleeper Hybrid is a transformer. I pulled the tab. The mechanism was stiff at first. It unfolded into a bed. I lay down. The mattress layer is thin. I could feel the frame bars underneath if I pressed hard. It is fine for a night. I wouldn't want to sleep on it for a week.

Ethan and Jenna tested it as a sofa first. It sits higher, Jenna noted. The mechanism underneath makes the seat firm. Ethan liked the height. He stood up easily. They unfolded it. They lay down together. It was tight for two. Good for guests we don't want staying too long, Ethan joked.

Marcus checked the mechanism durability. He folded and unfolded it ten times. It seems solid, he said. He noted the metal didn't bend. He warned to watch fingers near the hinges. Dr. Walker noted that sleeper sofas often compromise on seating ergonomics. The seat is flatter and harder, he observed.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Dual functionality	Mattress is thin
Firm seating support	Heavy to move
Sturdy mechanism	Seat is stiffer than non-sleepers
Good for guest rooms	Mechanism adds weight

Details

• Price: Medium

• Function: Fold-out sleeper

• Mattress: Foam layer

• Seat Height: 18 inches

• Mechanism: Metal frame

• Assembly: Complex (heavy)

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	3.8	Compromise for function.
Support	4.2	Firm seat is supportive.
Design	4.0	Looks like a normal sofa.
Durability	4.0	Mechanism adds wear points.
Overall	4.0	Solid choice for guest rooms.

10. 4-Seater Straight

Our Testing Experience:

This is the long hauler. I assembled the extra middle module. It creates a very long straight line. I sat in the middle. I expected a dip. There was none. The connection is strong. I lay down fully. I didn't touch the armrests. It is a great napping bench for one.

Jenna and Ethan sat with Jamal. Three adults fit easily. We aren't shoulder to shoulder, Jenna noted. They liked the spacing. They watched a show. They felt the straight layout was good for viewing a wall-mounted TV.

Marcus noted the middle seat felt different. It's a bit harder, he said. The reinforcement for the joint adds rigidity. He preferred the end seats. He liked the visual length. He said it anchored the long wall of our test room perfectly.

Pros & Cons

Pros	Cons
Huge linear seating	Middle seat feels different
Great for long walls	Hard to converse (too far)
No sagging in middle	Heavy to move as one unit
Modular expansion	Linear layout limits interaction

Details

• Price: Medium

• Length: 100+ inches

• Seat Depth: 24 inches

• Seat Height: 17.5 inches

• Configuration: 4-Seater Linear

• Assembly: Modular

Review Score

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	4.3	Good, slight variance in seats.
Support	4.4	Reinforced middle works.
Design	4.2	Dramatic linear look.
Durability	4.4	Strong connections.
Overall	4.3	Best for long, narrow rooms.

Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas

Sofa	Overall Score	Seat Comfort	Back Support	Seat Depth Fit	Cooling / Breathability	Durability	Ease of Movement
Classic 3-Seater	4.2	4.0	4.5	4.2	4.0	4.4	4.5
L-Shape	4.5	4.6	4.3	4.5	3.5	4.4	4.0
U-Shape	4.6	4.7	4.5	4.5	4.0	4.5	4.0
Cloud	4.4	4.8	3.5	4.2	3.5	4.0	2.5
Studio	4.1	3.8	4.4	3.8	4.0	4.2	4.5
Chesterfield	4.3	4.0	4.2	4.3	3.5	4.0	4.0
Modern Corner	4.2	4.0	4.5	4.2	4.0	4.5	4.0
Deep Lounger	4.5	4.8	4.0	3.0	3.5	4.3	3.0
Sleeper	4.0	3.8	4.2	4.2	3.5	4.0	3.5
4-Seater	4.3	4.3	4.4	4.4	4.0	4.4	4.0

The scores highlight specific strengths. The U-Shape Grand and L-Shape dominate in overall versatility and comfort. The Cloud and Deep Lounger score incredibly high on comfort but sacrifice support and ease of movement. The Classic 3-Seater and Studio are the champions of support and posture, even if they aren't the coziest. Breathability is average across the board, with the woven fabrics scoring better than the microfibers and velvets.

Best Picks

• Best Zorora Sofa Overall: The U-Shape Grand. It delivers massive seating capacity, consistent comfort, and a social layout that our testing team loved for group activities.

• Best Zorora Sofa for Lounging: The Cloud Modular. If your priority is napping and sinking into softness, this model offers a luxurious, plush experience that rivals much more expensive brands.

• Best Zorora Sofa for Small Spaces: The Classic 3-Seater. It balances a compact footprint with excellent frame stability and supportive seating, making it perfect for apartments.

How to Choose the Zorora Sofa?

Choosing the right Zorora model depends on your room and your back.

First, measure your space. If you have a large open plan, the U-Shape Grand or 4-Seater Straight will anchor the room. For tight apartments, strictly stick to the Classic 3-Seater or 2-Seater Studio.

Second, assess your usage. Do you nap? Avoid the Modern Corner and Chesterfield; their arms are too hard. Go for the Cloud or L-Shape. Do you work from the couch? The Classic 3-Seater or Modern Corner provides the upright support you need for a laptop.

Third, consider your height. If you are over 6 feet like Jamal, the Deep-Seat Lounger is a must. Standard depths will feel too short. If you are petite like Mia, the Studio or Classic will allow your feet to reach the floor.

Limitations

Zorora sofas have clear limitations. The "sofa-in-a-box" nature means cushions are often compressed and take time to expand. They are generally lighter than traditional hardwood furniture, which makes them easier to move but slightly less "grounded" feeling. The fabrics are durable but synthetic; you won't find high-end linens or leathers here. The modular connections are strong, but on some models (like the L-Shape), you can feel the hard bracket if you sit exactly on the crack. They are designed for convenience and modern living, not for heirloom longevity.

Is the Zorora Sofa worth it?

The Zorora lineup offers exceptional value for the price.

• You get modern, modular designs that are easy to ship and assemble.

• The frame warranties and solid connectors make them sturdier than typical flat-pack furniture.

• Comfort levels on the Cloud and L-Shape rival sofas costing twice as much.

• However, if you want a "forever sofa" with natural fibers and coil-spring suspension, look elsewhere.

• For renters, young families, and people who move frequently, Zorora is absolutely worth the investment.

FAQs

1. Is Zorora assembly difficult?

No. Most models took us 15-20 minutes. It is tool-free for the most part, using sliding brackets and screw-in legs.

2. Are the covers washable?

On most modular models like the Cloud and L-Shape, the cushion covers are removable and washable. Always check the specific fabric tag.

3. Does the foam sag over time?

The standard foam is firm and holds up well. The "Cloud" fill requires regular fluffing to maintain its shape, or it will look messy.

4. Can I change the layout later?

Yes, for the modular series (L-Shape, U-Shape, Cloud). You can often buy extra armless pieces to expand your sofa.

5. Is the velvet pet-friendly?

The velvet on the Chesterfield is durable but attracts hair. It is easy to wipe clean, but you will need a lint roller.

6. How long does shipping take?

Since they are boxed, shipping is generally faster than custom furniture. We received our boxes within a week.

7. Are the boxes heavy?

Yes. While modular, the boxes can weigh 50-70 lbs. It is best to have two people to carry them inside.