Simplicity Sofas focuses on compact-depth seating that works in tight layouts without feeling undersized once you sit down. In our testing, the biggest wins were predictable posture support, easier room planning, and a build approach geared toward long-term upkeep. The trade-offs are less room to fully stretch out (especially if you’re taller) and a custom-order process that doesn’t offer much flexibility once you commit.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Megan Full-Size Sofa | 4.4 | Balanced seat feel; strong posture support | Not a “sink-in” lounge profile | Mixed-use living rooms, daily TV + laptop | $1,999 |
| Jenna Full-Size Sofa | 4.5 | Relaxed rolled-arm comfort; easy to share | Rolled arms can steal elbow room | Couples and frequent loungers | $1,899 |
| Lorelei Apartment Size Sofa | 4.3 | Space-efficient footprint; clean corner fit | Tighter for two adults to sprawl | Apartments, narrow rooms, guest-ready seating | $1,849 |
| Ashton Full-Size Sofa | 4.3 | Wide arms feel like built-in side tables | Bigger visual footprint; higher price | Traditional look, armrest lovers | $2,099 |
Testing Team Takeaways
After rotating through these four builds, the theme was consistent: compact-depth sofas that still behave like everyday seating. The support stayed predictable even after long sessions and lots of repositioning.
Megan felt like the most balanced choice for upright TV, laptop work, and quick naps. Jenna was our easiest pick for shared lounging because the rolled arms make long sessions feel less rigid. Lorelei was the best space saver, but it felt tightest when two adults tried to recline at the same time. Ashton delivered the most traditional, arm-forward comfort, but it also asks the most from the room and the budget.
Simplicity Sofas comparison chart
| Comparison Item | Megan Full-Size Sofa | Jenna Full-Size Sofa | Lorelei Apartment Size Sofa | Ashton Full-Size Sofa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Listed price | $1,999 | $1,899 | $1,849 | $2,099 |
| Overall dimensions | 80" W x 32" D x 35" H | 78" W x 32" D x 35" H | 68" W x 32" D x 35" H | 88" W x 32" D x 35" H |
| Seat height | 19" | 19" | 19" | 19" |
| Seating depth | 21" | 21" | 21" | 21" |
| Arm style | Transitional, standard arm width | Rolled arms | Flared arms | Wide rolled arms |
| Arm width | 6" | 5" | 6" | 11" |
| Team comfort read | “Structured, steady” | “Relaxed, cuddle-friendly” | “Compact, tidy” | “Armrest-first lounge” |
| Back support feel | Most consistently upright | Softened by rolled-arm lounging | Supportive, but less sprawl room | Supportive, traditional posture |
| Best layout use | Balanced main-room anchor | Movie nights + shared seating | Tight rooms, apartment layouts | Larger rooms, classic styling |
| Cleaning practicality | Strong with slipcover strategy | Strong with slipcover strategy | Strong with slipcover strategy | Strong with slipcover strategy |
How we tested these sofas
We assembled each sofa the way most people would—unboxing, carry-in, setup, then daily living. Over the test period, we rotated through streaming marathons, laptop work, gaming sessions, short naps, and hosting friends.
We scored Assembly, Cooling/Breathability, Seat Comfort, Back Support, Seat Depth Fit, Layout Practicality, Cleaning, Durability, and Value on a consistent 1.0–5.0 scale. Scores reflect what we noticed after repeated posture changes, edge sitting, cushion refluffing, and everyday vacuum-and-spot-clean routines.
Simplicity Sofas: our testing experience
Megan Full-Size Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Megan became our default seat for late-night streaming and laptop time. The seat angle kept me supported without feeling forced, and I didn’t get the slow forward slide that shows up on softer couches. Marcus Reed did repeated edge-sits and stand-ups; the seat stayed composed and didn’t feel like it was collapsing. Mia Chen liked that the shallower depth didn’t leave her feet dangling, and Carlos Alvarez noted that the back support felt consistent even as he shifted between work posture and a more relaxed recline.
What we liked
-
A steady seat that doesn’t let you drift forward
-
Back support that stays consistent through long sessions
-
Compact depth that’s easier to place in tight rooms
Who it is best for
-
Everyday mixed use: TV, laptop time, quick naps
-
Anyone who wants steadier lumbar support
-
Smaller living rooms that still need guest seating
Where it falls short
-
Not a deep, sink-in lounge feel
-
Taller loungers may want more stretch-out room
-
Custom ordering leaves little room for second thoughts
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Upright-friendly seat feel | Not a deep, chaise-like sprawl |
| Feels stable even under heavier use | Plush seekers will want spring-down |
| Compact depth simplifies room planning | Custom ordering requires confident choices |
| Cushion choices let you tune the feel | Not much flexibility if preferences change |
Details
-
Price: $1,999.
-
Tested configuration: Megan Full-Size Sofa (3-seat).
-
Dimensions: 80" W x 32" D x 35" H.
-
Seat height: 19".
-
Seating depth: 21"; seat cushion depth: 27".
-
Back height: 30"; back cushion depth: 6".
-
Arm height: 28"; arm width: 6"; seating area between arms: 68".
-
Frame construction: kiln-dried solid oak; corner-blocked, doweled, stapled, glued.
-
Support system: elasticized webbing spring support.
-
Cushion options: 2.5 density HR Ultracel foam (extra firm), memory gel (medium firm), spring-down (plush).
-
Assembly: shipped unassembled; typical assembly about 15 minutes with no tools.
-
Delivery: threshold delivery included; white-glove delivery available for an additional $300 per order (availability varies).
-
Returns/cancellations: not accepted.
-
Warranty: 10-year warranty on materials and workmanship (with noted exceptions).
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Quick to put together, but it’s still a setup step. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0 | Breathability depends a lot on your upholstery choice. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.3 | Supportive comfort that stays consistent over time. |
| Back Support | 4.5 | Best posture support of the group during long sessions. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.5 | Works well for upright-to-recline transitions. |
| Layout Practicality | 4.7 | Compact depth makes room planning easier. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.2 | Easy to adjust cushions, but the sit stays structured. |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | Modular approach makes upkeep feel manageable. |
| Durability | 4.7 | Materials and support feel built for the long haul. |
| Value | 4.2 | Strong build story; customization adds complexity. |
| Overall Score | 4.4 | The most balanced “daily driver” feel. |
Jenna Full-Size Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Jenna was the sofa we gravitated toward when we wanted the room to feel less “upright.” The rolled arms changed how people lounged—Jenna Brooks and Ethan Cole naturally took the corners, and it felt movie-night ready without needing extra pillows. Carlos noticed the back support didn’t push his shoulders forward during laptop sessions. Jamal Davis sprawled diagonally and said the seat stayed supportive instead of turning into a soft trough.
What we liked
-
Rolled arms that work as real headrests
-
Easy, couple-friendly lounging
-
Supportive without feeling rigid
Who it is best for
-
Couples who use the sofa nightly
-
People who move between upright and reclined
-
Loungers who use arms as headrests
Where it falls short
-
Rolled arms trade off with clean, squared-off seat space
-
Still not built for ultra-deep sprawl
-
You need to be sure about comfort choices up front
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Most lounge-friendly shape of the group | Rolled arms can steal elbow room |
| Good balance of support and comfort | Not built for ultra-deep sprawl |
| Easy for two people to share | Custom ordering limits flexibility later |
| Stable when shifting positions | Fabric choice matters |
Details
-
Price: $1,899.
-
Tested configuration: Jenna Full-Size Sofa (3-seat).
-
Dimensions: 78" W x 32" D x 35" H.
-
Seat height: 19".
-
Seating depth: 21"; seat cushion depth: 27".
-
Back height: 30"; back cushion depth: 6".
-
Arm height: 25.5"; arm width: 5"; seating area between arms: 68".
-
Frame construction: kiln-dried solid oak; corner-blocked, doweled, stapled, glued.
-
Support system: elasticized webbing spring support.
-
Cushion options: 2.5 density HR Ultracel foam (extra firm), memory gel (medium firm), spring-down (plush).
-
Assembly: typical assembly about 15 minutes with no tools.
-
Delivery: threshold delivery included; white-glove delivery available for an additional $300 per order (availability varies).
-
Returns/cancellations: not accepted.
-
Warranty: 10-year warranty on materials and workmanship (with noted exceptions).
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Straightforward with a clear staging plan. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0 | Upholstery choice makes the difference here. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.6 | Best “settle-in” feel without losing support. |
| Back Support | 4.3 | Comfortable for long sessions; slightly less rigid than Megan. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.5 | Works across body types with fewer awkward angles. |
| Layout Practicality | 4.6 | Compact depth plus slightly narrower width helps. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.5 | Smooth posture shifts; easy to share the space. |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | Modular approach keeps maintenance realistic. |
| Durability | 4.7 | Frame and cushion approach reads high-grade. |
| Value | 4.3 | Strong comfort-to-price case in this group. |
| Overall Score | 4.5 | The best blend of support and lounge comfort. |
Lorelei Apartment Size Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Lorelei was the “the room is the constraint” pick that still looked intentional. It felt best when we used it in a more upright, conversational way—great for chatting, surprisingly workable for laptop time, and less ideal when I tried to fully sprawl. Mia liked that the seat depth didn’t swallow her legs, and Carlos said the back support held up even when he shifted side to side. When Jenna and Ethan tried to share it the way they do on movie nights, sitting was fine, but reclining together made the size limits obvious.
What we liked
-
Fits tight rooms without feeling like a compromise
-
Upright support that works for laptop time and TV
-
Easy to tuck into narrow layouts
Who it is best for
-
Apartments and small dens
-
People who sit more upright than they sprawl
-
Guest seating where space is tight
Where it falls short
-
Tight for two adults trying to lounge at once
-
Less stretch-out surface area
-
Cushion choice matters more when you can’t shift much
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent for compact rooms | Tight for two-adult lounging |
| Supportive for everyday sitting | Not a nap-first sofa |
| Works well as guest-ready seating | Less room for big-body sprawl |
| Same core build approach as larger models | Cushion choice matters |
Details
-
Price: $1,849.
-
Tested configuration: Lorelei Apartment Size Sofa (2-seat).
-
Dimensions: 68" W x 32" D x 35" H.
-
Seat height: 19".
-
Seating depth: 21"; seat cushion depth: 27".
-
Back height: 30"; back cushion depth: 6".
-
Arm height: 27"; arm width: 6"; seating area between arms: 56".
-
Frame construction: kiln-dried solid oak; corner-blocked, doweled, stapled, glued.
-
Support system: elasticized webbing spring support.
-
Cushion options: 2.5 density HR Ultracel foam (extra firm), memory gel (medium firm), spring-down (plush).
-
Assembly: typical assembly about 15 minutes with no tools.
-
Delivery: threshold delivery included; white-glove delivery available for an additional $300 per order (availability varies).
-
Returns/cancellations: not accepted.
-
Warranty: 10-year warranty on materials and workmanship (with noted exceptions).
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Same build rhythm; easy to manage in small spaces. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0 | Upholstery choice drives the outcome. |
| Seat Comfort | 3.9 | Comfortable for sitting; less forgiving for long sprawl. |
| Back Support | 4.2 | Consistent support for upright use. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.6 | Most universally “upright-friendly” depth feel. |
| Layout Practicality | 4.8 | Best choice when space is the real constraint. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.1 | Easy shifts solo; limited room for two loungers. |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | Practical maintenance mindset with modular parts. |
| Durability | 4.7 | Strong construction story and support system. |
| Value | 4.0 | Great for the right room; less versatile for the price. |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Best small-space fit, with real lounging trade-offs. |
Ashton Full-Size Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Ashton read as the most traditional living-room sofa in this group, largely because the rolled arms are wide and substantial. Marcus treated the arms like handles—leaning hard, sitting on the edge, then pushing off—and the frame still felt confident. Jamal liked propping a leg on the armrest while gaming, and the wide arms made long watching sessions feel more anchored. The trade-off is visual mass: in a smaller room, it can dominate faster than Megan or Jenna even though the depth stays compact.
What we liked
-
Wide arms you’ll actually use
-
Stable even when sitting on the edge
-
Traditional comfort without feeling mushy
Who it is best for
-
Armrest-first loungers
-
Classic styling when you have enough room
-
Households that want a sturdy, planted seat
Where it falls short
-
Wide arms reduce usable seat width
-
Bigger visual footprint in tight rooms
-
Higher price without a big comfort jump
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Most substantial armrests in this set | Wide arms trade off with usable seat width |
| Traditional profile with solid support | Feels larger in smaller rooms |
| Strong edge-sit stability | Highest price in this set |
| Consistent build quality | Not the most value-forward pick |
Details
-
Price: $2,099.
-
Tested configuration: Ashton Full-Size Sofa (3-seat).
-
Dimensions: 88" W x 32" D x 35" H.
-
Seat height: 19".
-
Seating depth: 21"; seat cushion depth: 27".
-
Back height: 30"; back cushion depth: 6".
-
Arm height: 27"; arm width: 11"; seating area between arms: 68".
-
Frame construction: kiln-dried solid oak; corner-blocked, doweled, stapled, glued.
-
Support system: elasticized webbing spring support.
-
Cushion options: 2.5 density HR Ultracel foam (extra firm), memory gel (medium firm), spring-down (plush).
-
Assembly: typical assembly about 15 minutes with no tools.
-
Delivery: threshold delivery included; white-glove delivery available for an additional $300 per order (availability varies).
-
Returns/cancellations: not accepted.
-
Warranty: 10-year warranty on materials and workmanship (with noted exceptions).
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Same build process; the boxes can be bulky. |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0 | Breathability depends on the upholstery you choose. |
| Seat Comfort | 4.3 | Comfortable and supportive; the arms double as rest zones. |
| Back Support | 4.4 | Good posture support, especially for upright viewing. |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.4 | Solid for average-height users; limited for tall sprawl. |
| Layout Practicality | 4.3 | Width and visual mass ask more from the room. |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.2 | Easy to shift positions, but it feels more planted. |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | Modular strategy helps; upholstery choice still matters. |
| Durability | 4.7 | Strong materials and support system confidence. |
| Value | 4.0 | Quality is clear; price premium is real. |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | A traditional-feel pick that needs the right room. |
How the scores compare
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Megan Full-Size Sofa | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 4.2 |
| Jenna Full-Size Sofa | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 4.5 |
| Lorelei Apartment Size Sofa | 4.3 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 4.1 |
| Ashton Full-Size Sofa | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 4.2 |
Durability scored high across the board. Where the models separate is in how their shapes support day-to-day lounging. Jenna is the easiest to live with if you like to shift positions. Megan is the most consistently supportive for posture-heavy use. Lorelei is the best fix for tight layouts, with the clearest trade-off in sprawl comfort. Ashton’s edge is traditional, arm-forward comfort, but it asks more from the room and the budget.
How to Choose the Simplicity Sofa?
Start with how you actually sit. If you spend long stretches upright—working, reading, or watching TV—prioritize back support and a depth that keeps you from slouching. If you lounge and lean, arm shape matters almost as much as cushion feel.
Dr. Adrian Walker’s feedback on our notes was simple: keep your lower back supported and avoid a seat that makes you slide forward over time. For petite users who dislike oversized seating, Lorelei or Megan tends to feel more controlled. For couples who recline together, Jenna is the safer pick. If you lean on armrests and prefer a traditional profile, Ashton fits best. Finally, remember that cooling and cleaning will depend heavily on upholstery—these models are offered in fabric, leather, and faux leather options, so choose based on your climate, pets, and cleaning habits.
Limitations to know up front
These sofas are designed around compact depth and modular practicality, not ultra-deep, sink-in lounging. Because returns and cancellations aren’t accepted, you want to be confident in your cushion and upholstery choices up front. If you rely on try-at-home-and-return convenience, or you need very deep seating for tall, full-body stretch-out naps, this lineup may feel restrictive.
Simplicity Sofas vs. alternatives
-
Why you might choose these models
-
Compact depth that helps tight-room layouts
-
Modular parts approach that supports long-term upkeep
-
Solid-wood frame and multiple cushion feels
-
-
Alternatives worth comparing
-
Lovesac Sactionals: modular layouts with a different scaling approach
-
Burrow Nomad: a simpler online buying flow with broad configuration options
-
IKEA Kivik: value-first comfort with mainstream availability
-
Pro tips before you order
-
Measure door width and stair turns before you order—not after.
-
If you’re posture-sensitive, favor a firmer cushion and add softness with throws.
-
If you lounge for hours, treat arm shape as a primary comfort feature.
-
Choose upholstery based on your real cleaning life: pets, kids, snacks, and light colors change the math.
-
Plan delivery day like a small project: clear a staging area and protect floors.
-
Give it a week to settle, then re-check cushion alignment and any covers.
-
For couples, test side-leaning and mid-movie repositioning—that’s where differences show up.
-
Keep a fabric-care kit nearby so small spills don’t become next-day stains.
-
If your room is narrow, map the footprint with painter’s tape to confirm walking clearance.
FAQs
Will a Simplicity Sofa feel too shallow for lounging?
If you prefer deep, sink-in sprawl, these can feel more upright. Jenna’s rolled arms make lounging easier, but none of the models are built as ultra-deep loungers.
Is assembly a hassle in real life?
Not if you plan ahead. Clear a staging area, unbox in order, and the pieces go together quickly once everything is out.
Which model is most couple-friendly?
Jenna. It was the easiest for two people to share on long movie nights without feeling boxed in.
