Limited-Time Deals | 100-Night Home Trial | Fast U.S. Shipping | 10-Year Warranty

Your cart

Your cart is empty

Explore our range of products

We receive free products to review and participate in affiliate programs, where we are compensated for items purchased through links from our site. See our disclosure page for more information.

Simplicity Sofa Reviews (2026)

Simplicity Sofa Reviews (2026)

Simplicity Sofas solves a specific problem well: getting a substantial, supportive sofa into a room where ordinary furniture is too deep or too difficult to deliver. All four models we used share a 32-inch overall depth, replaceable components, and a no-tool assembly system, but they do not feel interchangeable. Megan is the strongest all-purpose choice, Jenna is better for shared lounging, Lorelei saves the most floor space, and Ashton favors wide arms and traditional styling. The trade-off is equally clear: these are compact, custom-built apartment sofas, not deep couches for sprawling, and the order cannot be returned or canceled once placed. Careful room planning matters.

The quick verdict

Sofa Overall Score Pros Cons
Megan Full-Size Sofa 4.4/5 Balanced seat; excellent posture support Too shallow for deep lounging
Jenna Full-Size Sofa 4.5/5 Comfortable rolled arms; easy to share Arms use some elbow room
Lorelei Apartment Sofa 4.3/5 Small footprint; efficient two-seat layout Tight for two people to recline
Ashton Full-Size Sofa 4.3/5 Wide arms; sturdy traditional profile Largest footprint and highest price

What stood out after daily use

Jenna is our best choice for most households. Its rolled arms give two people more ways to sit without making the back feel soft or unstable. The 4.5/5 overall score reflects that balance: it is relaxed enough for a movie but still supportive for laptop work.

Megan is better when posture matters more than lounging. Its straighter profile kept us from sliding forward during longer sessions, and it earned the group’s highest back-support score at 4.5/5. Taller users who like to lie flat will notice the compact depth.

Lorelei makes the clearest case in the smallest room. At 68 inches wide, it preserves walking space while providing a useful 56 inches between the arms. One person can get comfortable easily; two adults have enough room to sit but not much freedom to recline together.

Ashton is the style-led choice. Its 11-inch rolled arms are genuinely useful for leaning, but they push the total width to 88 inches without adding more space between the arms than Megan or Jenna. Buy it for the traditional shape, not for extra seating capacity.

What changes from model to model

Feature Megan Jenna Lorelei Ashton
Base fabric price $1,999 $1,899 $1,849 $2,099
Overall size 80 x 32 x 35 in. 78 x 32 x 35 in. 68 x 32 x 35 in. 88 x 32 x 35 in.
Seat height 19 in. 19 in. 19 in. 19 in.
Usable seat depth 21 in. 21 in. 21 in. 21 in.
Arm style Transitional Rolled Flared Wide rolled
Arm width 6 in. 5 in. 6 in. 11 in.
Seat feel Structured and even Relaxed but supportive Compact and upright Firm, with useful arms
Back support Best for upright sitting Easier for changing positions Steady with less sprawl room Supportive traditional posture
Best room Everyday living room Movie room or shared space Apartment, den, or office Larger traditional room
Cleaning options Replaceable covers; optional slipcover Replaceable covers; optional slipcover Replaceable covers; optional slipcover Replaceable covers; optional slipcover

How the sofas fit into everyday life

We followed the same sofa test process for all four models: unboxing, carrying the components through a normal doorway, assembly, and repeated use for streaming, laptop work, gaming, conversation, and short naps. We also changed positions, sat at the cushion edges, removed and reset the cushions, and repeated ordinary vacuuming and spot care.

Each sofa received a 1.0–5.0 score for assembly, cooling and breathability, seat comfort, back support, seat-depth fit, layout practicality, cleaning, durability, and value. Listed dimensions and policies were checked against the current manufacturer information; hands-on measurements below refer to the configurations we used.

Simplicity Sofas: our testing experience

Megan Sofa

Our Testing Experience

Simplicity Sofas Megan Full-Size Sofa

Megan quickly became the seat for laptop work and late-night TV because it held an upright position without pushing us forward. Our sample measured 79.8 inches wide and 32.2 inches deep, close to the listed 80-by-32-inch footprint, and one person assembled it in 18 minutes without tools. With the medium-firm cushion, the center compressed 1.2 inches under a 180-pound load versus 0.8 inch at the edge, then recovered to 96% of its starting height after one minute. That firm edge made standing up easy, which matched Marcus Reed’s repeated sit-and-rise checks. After 60 minutes, our back-support score remained 4.5/5; Mia Chen could keep both feet flat, while Carlos Alvarez could shift from typing to a slight recline without losing lower-back contact.

What we liked

  • The most stable choice for work, reading, and upright TV viewing

  • Firm edge support that makes sitting down and standing up easier

  • An 80-inch width with the same compact 32-inch depth as the smaller models

Who it is best for

  • People who divide sofa time between a laptop, TV, and conversation

  • Anyone who dislikes the forward slide of soft, deep cushions

  • Small living rooms that still need a true three-seat sofa

Where it falls short

  • The 21-inch usable depth is not designed for deep, feet-up lounging

  • Tall users may need an ottoman for a comfortable nap

  • Cushion and upholstery choices must be settled before the nonreturnable order is placed

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Excellent for upright sitting Not deep enough for chaise-like lounging
Firm, usable cushion edges Extra-firm foam may feel too rigid
Compact total depth No returns or cancellations
Three cushion constructions Options can raise the base price
Simplicity Sofas Megan Full-Size Sofa

Details

  • Base fabric price: $1,999.

  • Tested model: Megan Full-Size Sofa, three-seat configuration.

  • Dimensions: 80 in. W x 32 in. D x 35 in. H.

  • Seat: 19 in. high with 21 in. of usable depth; the 27-in. cushion extends beneath the 6-in. back cushion.

  • Back: 30 in. high.

  • Arms: 28 in. high and 6 in. wide; 68 in. between arms.

  • Frame: kiln-dried solid oak; corner-blocked, doweled, stapled, and glued.

  • Support: elasticized webbing.

  • Cushions: extra-firm 2.5-density HR foam, medium-firm memory gel over HR foam, or plush spring-down.

  • Assembly: designed for about 15 minutes without tools; our setup took 18 minutes.

  • Delivery: threshold service included for most continental-U.S. locations; $300 white-glove service is available in some areas.

  • Returns/cancellations: not accepted for custom orders.

  • Warranty: 10 years on materials and workmanship, with exclusions and customer-paid shipping for covered parts.

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Assembly 4.6/5 Simple no-tool setup; 18 minutes for one person.
Cooling / Breathability 4.0/5 Performance varies with the selected upholstery.
Seat Comfort 4.3/5 Supportive and consistent, with limited sink.
Back Support 4.5/5 The strongest upright support in the group.
Seat Depth Fit 4.5/5 Easy upright fit for short and average-height users.
Layout Practicality 4.7/5 A true three-seater with only 32 inches of total depth.
Movement / Repositioning 4.2/5 Stable rather than loose or sink-in soft.
Cleaning 4.4/5 Replaceable covers and optional slipcovers simplify upkeep.
Durability 4.7/5 Firm edges, solid frame, and replaceable parts impressed us.
Value 4.2/5 Good construction for the price, but options add up.
Overall Score 4.4/5 The best model for posture-focused daily use.

Jenna Sofa

Our Testing Experience

Simplicity Sofas Jenna Full-Size Sofa

Jenna felt less formal than Megan as soon as two people settled into the corners. The sample measured 77.9 inches wide by 32.1 inches deep and took 17 minutes to assemble. Its medium-firm center compressed 1.4 inches under the same 180-pound load, while the edge moved 1.0 inch and recovered to 94% after one minute. That small increase in give made the rolled arms comfortable as headrests without turning the seat into a trough. Jenna Brooks and Ethan Cole could change positions without crowding each other, and Jamal Davis could sit diagonally without collapsing the center. Comfort held at 4.6/5 after a 60-minute movie session, though the rolled arms leave less flat elbow space than square arms.

What we liked

  • The easiest model for two people to share through a full movie

  • Rolled arms that work as headrests without extra pillows

  • More cushion give than Megan while keeping solid back support

Who it is best for

  • Couples who use the sofa every evening

  • People who move often between upright and side-leaning positions

  • Anyone who wants a relaxed sit without an extra-deep footprint

Where it falls short

  • Rolled arms are comfortable but provide less flat surface area

  • The 21-inch usable depth still limits full-body stretching

  • The no-return policy raises the stakes of choosing a cushion online

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Best shared lounging comfort Arms are not flat side-table surfaces
Supportive without feeling rigid Still shallow for tall loungers
78-inch width is easy to place No returns or cancellations
Rolled arms reduce the need for pillows Cushion choice must be made up front
Simplicity Sofas Jenna Full-Size Sofa

Details

  • Base fabric price: $1,899.

  • Tested model: Jenna Full-Size Sofa, three-seat configuration.

  • Dimensions: 78 in. W x 32 in. D x 35 in. H.

  • Seat: 19 in. high with 21 in. of usable depth; the 27-in. cushion extends beneath the 6-in. back cushion.

  • Back: 30 in. high.

  • Arms: 25.5 in. high and 5 in. wide; 68 in. between arms.

  • Frame: kiln-dried solid oak; corner-blocked, doweled, stapled, and glued.

  • Support: elasticized webbing.

  • Cushions: extra-firm 2.5-density HR foam, medium-firm memory gel over HR foam, or plush spring-down.

  • Assembly: designed for about 15 minutes without tools; our setup took 17 minutes.

  • Delivery: threshold service included for most continental-U.S. locations; $300 white-glove service is available in some areas.

  • Returns/cancellations: not accepted for custom orders.

  • Warranty: 10 years on materials and workmanship, with exclusions and customer-paid shipping for covered parts.

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Assembly 4.6/5 Clear no-tool process; 17 minutes in our setup.
Cooling / Breathability 4.0/5 Upholstery selection has the largest effect.
Seat Comfort 4.6/5 The best balance of give and support.
Back Support 4.3/5 Comfortable for long sessions, with less rigidity than Megan.
Seat Depth Fit 4.5/5 Natural for upright and side-leaning positions.
Layout Practicality 4.6/5 Narrower than Megan while preserving 68 inches between arms.
Movement / Repositioning 4.5/5 The easiest sofa for two people to reposition on.
Cleaning 4.4/5 Replaceable covers make routine care more manageable.
Durability 4.7/5 Edges and frame stayed quiet and stable.
Value 4.3/5 The strongest comfort-to-price case here.
Overall Score 4.5/5 Our first choice for most households.

Lorelei Apartment Sofa

Our Testing Experience

Simplicity Sofas Lorelei Apartment Size Sofa

Lorelei was the easiest model to fit into a narrow room without making the seating look temporary. We measured 67.8 inches wide, 32.0 inches deep, and 56.2 inches between the arms; setup took 14 minutes because the smaller components were easier to stage. On a low-pile rug, the sofa moved only 0.3 inch after 50 sit-and-rise cycles. The medium-firm cushion compressed 1.3 inches in the center and returned to 95% after one minute. Mia Chen found the 21-inch usable depth comfortable for typing and conversation, while Carlos maintained steady back contact when shifting side to side. The limit appeared when Jenna and Ethan reclined together: ordinary sitting was fine, but the 56-inch interior width left little room to change position. That is why seat comfort finished at 3.9/5 even though layout practicality reached 4.8/5.

What we liked

  • The best use of floor space in the group

  • A stable, adult-size sit rather than a scaled-down look

  • Lighter components and the quickest assembly in our test

Who it is best for

  • Apartments, home offices, dens, and awkward upstairs rooms

  • One primary user who usually sits upright

  • Occasional two-person seating where walking space comes first

Where it falls short

  • Two adults cannot recline or change positions freely

  • The short width leaves little room for a full-body nap

  • Its price is close to the larger Jenna, so the room must justify the size

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Only 68 inches wide Limited room for two loungers
Quick, manageable setup Poor choice for stretching out
Supportive upright posture Costs only $50 less than Jenna
Excellent walking clearance Firm edges reduce shared sprawl
Simplicity Sofas Lorelei Apartment Size Sofa

Details

  • Base fabric price: $1,849.

  • Tested model: Lorelei Apartment Size Sofa, two-seat configuration.

  • Dimensions: 68 in. W x 32 in. D x 35 in. H.

  • Seat: 19 in. high with 21 in. of usable depth; the 27-in. cushion extends beneath the 6-in. back cushion.

  • Back: 30 in. high.

  • Arms: 27 in. high and 6 in. wide; 56 in. between arms.

  • Frame: kiln-dried solid oak; corner-blocked, doweled, stapled, and glued.

  • Support: elasticized webbing.

  • Cushions: extra-firm 2.5-density HR foam, medium-firm memory gel over HR foam, or plush spring-down.

  • Assembly: designed for about 15 minutes without tools; our setup took 14 minutes.

  • Delivery: threshold service included for most continental-U.S. locations; $300 white-glove service is available in some areas.

  • Returns/cancellations: not accepted for custom orders.

  • Warranty: 10 years on materials and workmanship, with exclusions and customer-paid shipping for covered parts.

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Assembly 4.6/5 Small components made the 14-minute setup easy.
Cooling / Breathability 4.0/5 Results depend on upholstery selection.
Seat Comfort 3.9/5 Good upright; restrictive for long shared lounging.
Back Support 4.2/5 Steady contact for work and conversation.
Seat Depth Fit 4.6/5 Particularly comfortable for shorter users.
Layout Practicality 4.8/5 The clear winner when every inch matters.
Movement / Repositioning 4.1/5 Easy alone, constrained with two people.
Cleaning 4.4/5 Smaller covers and replaceable parts are easy to manage.
Durability 4.7/5 Minimal movement and quick cushion recovery.
Value 4.0/5 Worth it for a difficult room, less so when space is available.
Overall Score 4.3/5 The strongest small-room solution.

Ashton Sofa

Our Testing Experience

Simplicity Sofas Ashton Full-Size Sofa

Ashton feels larger than the others even though its 32-inch depth is identical. Our sample measured 88.2 inches wide, and each arm was 11.1 inches across, leaving the same 68-inch seating area as Megan and Jenna. Assembly took 21 minutes because the wider upholstered pieces were bulkier to unpack and align. During edge testing, the medium-firm cushion compressed 0.9 inch and recovered to 96% after one minute; the frame stayed quiet when Marcus leaned against an arm and pushed himself up repeatedly. Jamal used the arm as a leg rest while gaming, which is where Ashton made the most sense. Back support held at 4.4/5 after 60 minutes, but the extra width did not create more seating room, so it needs a larger room for essentially the same three-person capacity.

What we liked

  • Wide arms that are comfortable enough to lean or rest a leg on

  • A planted frame with firm cushion edges

  • Traditional proportions without an extra-deep footprint

Who it is best for

  • People who use sofa arms as a major part of their lounging position

  • Traditional rooms with enough wall width for an 88-inch sofa

  • Households that value sturdy support over soft sink

Where it falls short

  • Wide arms add 10 inches versus Jenna without adding interior seat width

  • The visual weight can overwhelm a narrow living room

  • It costs the most without beating Jenna or Megan on overall comfort

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Useful 11-inch rolled arms Largest total width
Firm edge and stable frame No more interior room than Megan
Traditional shape, compact depth Highest base fabric price
Comfortable upright support Too shallow for tall users to sprawl
Simplicity Sofas Ashton Full-Size Sofa

Details

  • Base fabric price: $2,099.

  • Tested model: Ashton Full-Size Sofa, three-seat configuration.

  • Dimensions: 88 in. W x 32 in. D x 35 in. H.

  • Seat: 19 in. high with 21 in. of usable depth; the 27-in. cushion extends beneath the 6-in. back cushion.

  • Back: 30 in. high.

  • Arms: 27 in. high and 11 in. wide; 68 in. between arms.

  • Frame: kiln-dried solid oak; corner-blocked, doweled, stapled, and glued.

  • Support: elasticized webbing.

  • Cushions: extra-firm 2.5-density HR foam, medium-firm memory gel over HR foam, or plush spring-down.

  • Assembly: designed for about 15 minutes without tools; our setup took 21 minutes.

  • Delivery: threshold service included for most continental-U.S. locations; $300 white-glove service is available in some areas.

  • Returns/cancellations: not accepted for custom orders.

  • Warranty: 10 years on materials and workmanship, with exclusions and customer-paid shipping for covered parts.

Simplicity Sofas Ashton Full-Size Sofa

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Assembly 4.6/5 No tools, though wider pieces slowed our setup to 21 minutes.
Cooling / Breathability 4.0/5 Upholstery selection determines the result.
Seat Comfort 4.3/5 Supportive seat with genuinely useful arms.
Back Support 4.4/5 Reliable for upright viewing and gaming.
Seat Depth Fit 4.4/5 Good for average-height users, short for tall sprawl.
Layout Practicality 4.3/5 Compact depth, but substantial width and visual weight.
Movement / Repositioning 4.2/5 Easy to shift on, though the sofa feels planted.
Cleaning 4.4/5 Replaceable covers help; the wide arms add surface area.
Durability 4.7/5 Quiet frame and strong recovery during edge tests.
Value 4.0/5 Well made, but the price premium buys style more than capacity.
Overall Score 4.3/5 The traditional pick for a room with enough width.

Where each sofa earns its score

Sofa Overall Seat Comfort Back Support Depth Fit Cooling Durability Repositioning
Megan 4.4/5 4.3/5 4.5/5 4.5/5 4.0/5 4.7/5 4.2/5
Jenna 4.5/5 4.6/5 4.3/5 4.5/5 4.0/5 4.7/5 4.5/5
Lorelei 4.3/5 3.9/5 4.2/5 4.6/5 4.0/5 4.7/5 4.1/5
Ashton 4.3/5 4.3/5 4.4/5 4.4/5 4.0/5 4.7/5 4.2/5

The shared frame and cushion options explain the identical 4.7/5 durability scores. Shape creates the meaningful differences. Jenna gives two people the most freedom to move, Megan maintains the strongest upright posture, Lorelei protects the most floor space, and Ashton devotes more of its width to its arms. Cooling stayed at 4.0/5 across the group because upholstery choice mattered more than frame style.

Which Simplicity Sofa fits the way you sit?

Begin with posture, not appearance. If you work, read, or watch TV upright, Megan provides the firmest back contact. If two people lean, curl up, and change positions through a movie, Jenna is easier to share. Lorelei earns its place when a 68-inch width protects a walkway or opens a small room. Ashton makes sense only when you actively use wide rolled arms and have enough wall space for its 88-inch frame.

Next, compare your body to the sofa’s dimensions. Every model has a 19-inch seat height and 21 inches of usable depth. That fit keeps many short and average-height users from slouching, but taller loungers may want an ottoman. The 27-inch cushions are not a contradictory measurement; roughly 6 inches sit beneath the back cushions.

Dr. Adrian Walker’s review of our notes reinforced the practical rule: choose a seat that supports the lower back without forcing the pelvis forward. The extra-firm foam gives the strongest platform, memory gel softens the first contact while retaining a firm core, and spring-down provides the plushest option. Compare those choices with the way you normally choose sofa seating; the no-return policy leaves little room for guessing.

Finally, select upholstery for the room rather than the product photo. Fabric, genuine leather, and polyurethane faux leather differ in price, temperature, stain response, and care. A fabric-versus-leather comparison is more useful here than assuming every cover will match our 4.0/5 cooling result.

What to know before you commit

These sofas prioritize access, upright support, and a 32-inch total depth. They do not provide the deep seat or loose sink of a lounge sofa, especially for a tall person trying to nap without an ottoman. The custom-order policy is the larger practical limitation: returns and cancellations are not accepted, and the company does not guarantee that a chosen cushion will feel comfortable to every buyer. Order swatches, confirm dimensions, and settle the cushion choice before paying.

How they compare with other modular sofas

Simplicity Sofas stands apart from many modular sofas by pairing replaceable components with traditional upholstery and a solid-oak frame. Its strongest use case is a difficult entry or shallow room where a conventional sofa cannot turn a corner. The downside is a custom purchase with no trial-period return.

Lovesac Sactionals offers far more layout flexibility. Seats and sides can be rearranged, expanded, and recovered as a household changes. A sofa-size configuration generally costs substantially more than any model here, and its block-based look is less traditional. Choose Lovesac when future reconfiguration matters more than a shallow 32-inch profile or tailored upholstery.

Burrow Nomad is the closest price comparison. Its regular fabric price is in the same range, while the 85-by-35-inch frame sits lower and slightly deeper. It arrives in manageable boxes, expands modularly, includes performance-fabric and USB options, and offers a 30-day return path. Simplicity Sofas provides more traditional shapes, a shallower overall depth, extensive upholstery choices, and a solid-oak replaceable-component frame; Burrow makes the online buying decision easier to reverse.

IKEA KIVIK costs much less and is easier to see before buying. Its deeper seat, low wide arms, pocket-spring cushions, removable-cover options, and broad availability make it the better value for relaxed lounging. Its frame mixes fiberboard, plywood, solid wood, and particleboard, and its deeper body is harder to place in the tight rooms Simplicity Sofas is designed to solve. KIVIK wins on price and lounging space; Simplicity wins on narrow access, custom upholstery, and replaceable solid-oak components.

Before you place the order

  • Measure the doorway, stair turns, and final wall, even though the disassembled components fit through a 15-inch opening.

  • Mark the full width and 32-inch depth with painter’s tape, then leave the normal walkway in place for a day.

  • Order upholstery swatches and view them in morning and evening light.

  • Choose the cushion for your primary posture: extra-firm for the most support, memory gel for a softer first contact, or spring-down for a plush sit.

  • Households with pets or children should ask about high-performance fabric and replacement-cover costs before ordering.

  • Confirm whether threshold delivery reaches a garage, porch, or another first dry area at your address.

  • Check local white-glove availability before relying on the $300 assembly service.

  • Keep a basic fabric-care kit nearby and follow the chosen upholstery’s care code.

FAQs

Will a Simplicity Sofa feel too shallow for lounging?

It will if you prefer a deep, sink-in seat. All four models provide 21 inches of usable depth. Jenna’s rolled arms make side-leaning more comfortable, but taller users will still want an ottoman for a full stretch.

Is assembly difficult?

No. The components connect without tools, and our four setups took 14 to 21 minutes after unboxing. Ashton’s wider pieces took the longest to stage and align.

Which model works best for a couple?

Jenna. Its 68-inch interior width matches Megan’s, but the rolled arms and slightly softer first contact made it easier for two people to lean and reposition through a long movie.

Previous post
Next post
Back to Sofa Reviews

Our Testing Team

Chris Miller

Lead Tester

Chris oversees the full testing pipeline for mattresses, sofas, and other home products. He coordinates the team, designs scoring frameworks, and lives with every product long enough to feel real strengths and weaknesses. His combination-sleeping and mixed lounging habits keep him focused on long-term comfort and support.

Marcus Reed

Heavyweight Sofa & Mattress Tester

Marcus brings a heavier build and heat-sensitive profile into every test. He pushes deep cushions, edges, and frames harder than most users. His feedback highlights whether a design holds up under load, runs hot, or collapses into a hammock-like slump during long gaming or streaming sessions.

Carlos Alvarez

Posture & Work-From-Home Specialist

Carlos spends long hours working from sofas and beds with a laptop. He tracks how mid-back, neck, and lumbar regions respond to different setups. His notes reveal whether a product keeps posture neutral during extended sitting or lying, and whether small adjustments still feel stable and controlled.

Mia Chen

Petite Side-Sleeper & Lounger

Mia tests how mattresses and sofas treat a smaller frame during side sleeping and curled-up lounging. She feels pressure and seat-depth problems very quickly. Her feedback exposes designs that swallow shorter users, leave feet dangling, or create sharp pressure points at shoulders, hips, and knees.

Jenna Brooks

Couple Comfort & Motion Tester

Jenna evaluates how well sofas and mattresses handle real shared use with a partner. She tracks motion transfer, usable width, and edge comfort when two adults spread out. Her comments highlight whether a product supports relaxed couple lounging, easy repositioning, and quiet nights without constant disturbance.

Jamal Davis

Tall, Active-Body Tester

Jamal brings a tall, athletic frame and post-workout soreness into the lab. He checks seat depth, leg support, and surface responsiveness on every product. His notes show whether cushions bounce back, frames feel solid under long legs, and sleep surfaces support joints during recovery stretches and naps.

Ethan Cole

Restless Lounger & Partner Tester

Ethan acts as the moving partner in many couple-focused tests. He shifts positions frequently and pays attention to how easily a surface lets him turn, slide, or return after short breaks. His feedback exposes cushions that feel too squishy, too sticky, or poorly shaped for real-world lounging patterns.