These four Simpli Home sofas look similar at a glance, but they suit very different ways of sitting. Our hands-on testing found Livingston easiest to share, Richard best for upright sitting, Morrison most comfortable for deep lounging, and Rex best only when its low, oversized layout fits both the room and the people using it. The deciding factors were seat depth, seat height, heat buildup, and how quickly each cushion recovered after a long sit.
Product overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Test-Period Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison Sofa | 4.1 | Plush bench seat; sturdy support system | Long seat depth; warmth after long sits | Loungers who want a classic leather look | $1,999 |
| Livingston Sofa | 4.3 | Balanced depth; easy-care zip-off covers | Medium-soft rather than firm | Mixed households that share the sofa nightly | $1,299 |
| Richard Sofa | 4.1 | Manageable depth; strong frame; easy leg-only setup | Low back for taller loungers | Upright sitters who still want leather comfort | $2,219 |
| Rex Sofa | 4.0 | Huge seating span; wide arms; modular build | Low seat; long seat depth | Big-room loungers who sprawl and host | $2,279 |
Testing team takeaways
Nightly TV sessions, laptop work, and side-by-side lounging exposed differences that a quick sit would miss. Marcus focused on heat and edge support, while Jenna and Ethan tracked motion, cushion recovery, and how easily they could change positions.
Livingston is our clear all-around pick because its 22.8-inch listed seat depth worked for the widest range of testers. Morrison is better when a soft bench seat matters more than upright posture. Richard gives shorter and average-height sitters the cleanest route to feet-on-floor support. Rex provides the most room, but its 15.98-inch listed seat height makes standing up noticeably harder.
Simpli Home Sofa comparison chart
| Spec / Test Item | Morrison Sofa | Livingston Sofa | Richard Sofa | Rex Sofa |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size (W x D x H) | 88.8" x 38.25" x 34" | 90" x 35.5" x 32.75" | 83" x 38" x 30" | 122" x 38" x 27" |
| Seat depth | 25.2" | 22.8" | 22.8" | 25.59" |
| Seat height | 18.1" | 18.1" | 17.25" | 15.98" |
| Upholstery | Genuine aniline leather (Kind Leather) | Woven-blend fabric with recycled content | Semi-aniline genuine leather | Genuine aniline leather (Kind Leather) |
| Seat cushion | 6" bench cushion; foam core wrapped in feathers | 7" cushions; foam cores wrapped in feathers | Loose cushions with zip-off covers | Foam cores wrapped in feathers/fiber + polyester |
| Support system | Webbing + high-gauge sinuous springs | Webbing + high-gauge sinuous springs | Sinuous zig-zag springs + webbing | Webbing + high-gauge sinuous springs |
| Cleaning | Wipe-down leather care routine | Zip-off covers; spot-clean routine | Zip-off covers; leather care routine | Leather wipe-down; modular seams to mind |
| Cooling | Warm after long sits | More breathable than leather | Warm after long sits | Warm after long sits |
| Depth fit | Deep, lounge-first | Most “middle ground” | Most manageable for upright sitting | Very deep, sprawl-first |
| Two-person comfort | Good, but deep | Best balance for two | Stable sit for two | Huge space, low seat height matters |
| Assembly | Legs + center support | Legs + center support | Leg-only setup | Connect modules |
How we tested it
Each sofa went through the same assembly check, repeated sit-and-rise cycles, shared movie nights, and two-hour laptop sessions. We scored cooling, comfort and support, short-term durability, cleaning, and value on a five-point scale. Published dimensions remain manufacturer specifications; compression, temperature change, recovery time, module movement, and assembly time are our test observations.
Simpli Home Sofa: our testing experience
Morrison Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Morrison delivered the softest first sit. Its bench cushion compressed 1.8 inches at the center under our 180-pound load and 1.1 inches at the front edge, so it felt plush without losing support near the knees. Five minutes after the load was removed, the cushion had recovered 92% of its height. The trade-off appeared during a 60-minute gaming session, when the leather surface warmed 5.6°F. Its 25.2-inch listed seat depth was comfortable for stretching out, but Jenna needed a lumbar pillow to sit upright with her feet flat.
-
What we liked
-
Plush bench seat with 92% five-minute height recovery
-
Front edge stayed supportive during repeated stand-ups
-
Leg-and-center-support setup was simple
-
-
Who it is best for
-
People who prefer deep lounging and a leather sofa
-
Larger frames that want more thigh support
-
-
Where it falls short
-
Shorter sitters who want both feet flat without a lumbar pillow
-
Anyone sensitive to heat during hour-long sits

-
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Plush, even bench support | Long seat depth for shorter legs |
| Webbing-and-spring support | Leather warmth over long sessions |
| 900-lb stated capacity | Needs routine leather care |
| Straightforward assembly | Price sits above fabric options |

Details
-
Price during testing: $1,999
-
Overall dimensions: 88.8" W x 38.25" D x 34" H
-
Seat depth: 25.2"
-
Seat height: 18.1"
-
Upholstery: genuine aniline leather (Kind Leather)
-
Seat cushion: 6" bench cushion; high-density foam core wrapped in feathers
-
Back cushions/pillows: loose back cushions + bolster pillows with feather + polyester fiber fill
-
Frame/support: solid + engineered wood frame; webbing + sinuous springs
-
Weight capacity: 900 lbs (stated)
-
Net weight: 163.1 lbs
-
Warranty: one-year manufacturer warranty
-
Returns: 30-day request window for eligible direct purchases
-
Country of origin: Vietnam

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Legs and center support installed without difficulty |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.3 | Leather held warmth during long sits |
| Seat Comfort | 4.4 | Bench cushion recovered 92% in five minutes |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Loose back cushions helped, but needed fluffing |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.8 | Deep seat favored loungers over petite sitters |
| Short-term durability | 4.5 | No frame movement appeared in repeated-use checks |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.0 | Position changes were easy; upright sitting needed a pillow |
| Cleaning | 3.9 | Wipeable leather, but care routine matters |
| Value | 4.0 | Good materials, but priced above fabric alternatives |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Plush lounge comfort with depth and heat trade-offs |
Livingston Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Livingston was the easiest sofa to share because its 22.8-inch listed seat depth supported upright laptop work without blocking a relaxed movie-night position. Under the same 180-pound load, the cushion compressed 1.5 inches at the center and 0.9 inch at the edge, then recovered 96% within five minutes. After 60 minutes, the woven surface had warmed 3.1°F—less than any of the three leather models. Jenna and Ethan changed seats repeatedly without the cushions bunching, and the zip-off covers made spot cleaning less awkward.
-
What we liked
-
22.8-inch listed depth fit the widest range of testers
-
Zip-off covers simplified spot cleaning
-
Edges stayed steady during repeated sit-and-rise cycles
-
-
Who it is best for
-
Mixed-height households sharing one sofa nightly
-
Couples who often change positions during a movie
-
-
Where it falls short
-
People who want a very firm, upright seat
-
Buyers who specifically want leather upholstery
-

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Balanced seat depth | Not a firm, upright-only sit |
| Recycled-content woven-blend fabric | Fabric can show lint more than leather |
| Zip-off covers | Requires routine cushion fluffing |
| Strong frame/support build | — |

Details
-
Price during testing: $1,299
-
Overall dimensions: 90" W x 35.5" D x 32.75" H
-
Seat depth: 22.8"
-
Seat height: 18.1"
-
Upholstery: woven-blend fabric with recycled content
-
Cushions: 7" thick; foam cores wrapped in feathers
-
Covers: zip-off covers on loose cushions
-
Frame/support: corner-blocked solid + engineered wood; webbing + sinuous springs
-
Weight capacity: 900 lbs (stated)
-
Net weight: 119.0 lbs
-
Warranty: one-year manufacturer warranty
-
Returns: 30-day request window for eligible direct purchases
-
Country of origin: Vietnam

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Legs and center support installed without difficulty |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.8 | Woven fabric limited heat buildup during long sits |
| Seat Comfort | 4.4 | Medium-soft cushion compressed 1.5 inches at center |
| Back Support | 4.1 | Supported upright laptop work with minor fluffing |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.5 | Depth worked for most body types |
| Short-term durability | 4.3 | No frame movement appeared in repeated-use checks |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.2 | Easy to change positions |
| Cleaning | 4.2 | Zip-off covers simplified spot cleaning |
| Value | 4.6 | Strong everyday performance for the price |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | The most balanced option for typical households |
Richard Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Richard was the best choice for an upright sitting position. The listed 22.8-inch depth and 17.25-inch seat height let our shorter tester keep both feet down without adding a pillow. With a 180-pound load, the center compressed 1.3 inches and the front edge 0.8 inch; five-minute recovery reached 94%. Attaching the legs took 4 minutes 20 seconds. The leather warmed 5.2°F during a 60-minute sit, but the steady edge made standing easier than it was on Morrison or Rex.
-
What we liked
-
Seat height and depth supported feet-on-floor sitting
-
Zip-off cushion covers eased routine maintenance
-
Front edge stayed steady during quick stand-ups
-
-
Who it is best for
-
Upright sitters who still lounge occasionally
-
Couples who prefer a steadier, less cushioned feel
-
-
Where it falls short
-
People who want a taller, more pillow-like back
-
People who overheat during long leather-sofa sessions
-

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Comfortable depth for upright posture | Leather warmed during the hour-long test |
| Strong construction and support system | Low back for taller loungers |
| Zip-off cushion covers | Highest test-period price in the group |
| Quick leg-only setup | — |

Details
-
Price during testing: $2,219
-
Overall dimensions: 83" W x 38" D x 30" H
-
Seat depth: 22.8"
-
Seat height: 17.25"
-
Upholstery: genuine semi-aniline leather
-
Cushions: loose, non-reversible seat and back cushions; zip-off covers
-
Frame/legs: kiln-dried pine + beech + engineered wood frame; ash legs with levelers
-
Support system: sinuous zig-zag springs + webbing
-
Stated per-seat support: 300 lbs per seat
-
Total weight capacity (stated): 900 lbs
-
Net weight: 125 lbs
-
Warranty: one-year manufacturer warranty
-
Returns: 30-day request window for eligible direct purchases
-
Country of origin: Vietnam

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.8 | Leg attachment took 4 minutes 20 seconds |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.2 | Leather held warmth during long lounging |
| Seat Comfort | 4.1 | Supportive sit with moderate plushness |
| Back Support | 4.3 | Held posture well for extended sitting |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.5 | Depth fit a wider range of sitters |
| Short-term durability | 4.6 | No loosening or new noise in repeated-use checks |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.2 | Easy to change positions |
| Cleaning | 4.0 | Zip-off covers help; leather care still required |
| Value | 3.7 | Strong construction, but weak value at the test-period price |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Upright leather option with a low back |
Rex Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Rex is the clear oversized option, and its 122-inch width needs to be planned around. The published 15.98-inch seat height and 25.59-inch seat depth made it excellent for reclining but slowest for standing. After 50 sit-and-rise cycles, the module gap increased from 0.25 to 0.38 inch. The connected sections moved 1.1 inches on hard flooring but only 0.3 inch on a rug, so a nonslip pad is worthwhile. The leather surface warmed 6.1°F over 60 minutes, the largest increase in the group.
-
What we liked
-
122-inch span gave three people room to stretch out
-
Wide padded arms held a tablet and drink tray
-
Connectors limited the gap to 0.38 inch after 50 cycles
-
-
Who it is best for
-
People who sprawl, nap, and host often
-
Larger rooms that can handle an extra-wide 122-inch footprint
-
-
Where it falls short
-
Anyone who needs a higher seat for easier standing
-
Shorter sitters who want a shallow, upright position
-

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Huge size and capacity | Low seat height can be tiring |
| Extra-wide armrests | Very deep seat limits fit |
| Solid support build | Leather warmth over long sessions |
| Modular connection assembly | Takes space visually and physically |

Details
-
Price during testing: $2,279
-
Overall dimensions: 122" W x 38" D x 27" H
-
Seat depth: 25.59"
-
Seat height: 15.98"
-
Upholstery: genuine aniline leather (Kind Leather)
-
Cushions: high-density foam cores wrapped in feathers/fiber + polyester
-
Back/arms: slightly reclined back with foam padding; extra-wide padded armrests
-
Frame/support: solid + engineered wood frame; webbing + sinuous springs
-
Weight capacity: 900 lbs (stated)
-
Net weight: 257.9 lbs
-
Warranty: one-year manufacturer warranty
-
Returns: 30-day request window for eligible direct purchases
-
Country of origin: Vietnam

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.3 | Modular connectors were simple, but pieces are large |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.1 | Leather warmth showed up in long sessions |
| Seat Comfort | 4.3 | Deep seat supported reclining and naps |
| Back Support | 3.9 | Reclined back favored lounging over task sitting |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.3 | Depth and low seat height narrowed who it fit best |
| Short-term durability | 4.5 | Frame and connectors stayed tight in repeated-use checks |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.7 | Easy to recline; more effort required to stand |
| Cleaning | 3.9 | Wipeable leather, but more surface area to maintain |
| Value | 3.8 | Strong build, but the 122-inch size narrows its value |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Big-room choice for low, deep lounging |
Compare performance scores across these sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Short-term durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison Sofa | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 4.5 | 4.0 |
| Livingston Sofa | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| Richard Sofa | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 3.2 | 4.6 | 4.2 |
| Rex Sofa | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 4.5 | 3.7 |
Livingston earned the highest overall score because it combined a 4.5 for seat-depth fit with the best cooling result of the group. Richard matched that 4.5 depth-fit score and posted the strongest short-term durability result, but its warm leather and higher test-period price lowered its overall value. Morrison is the better deep-lounge choice, while Rex makes sense only when maximum seating width matters more than easy stand-ups.
How to choose the Simpli Home Sofa?
Choose by seat depth and seat height before color. Richard and Livingston are the better choices when you want both feet down and a more upright posture. Morrison and Rex favor reclining, naps, and larger bodies. Livingston’s woven-blend fabric stayed coolest and was simplest to spot-clean; the leather models wiped down easily but warmed more during long sits. Finally, check room and doorway dimensions. Rex needs an unusually long wall, and Morrison’s deep seat changes how far it projects into the room even though its width is conventional.
Limitations
The three leather models warmed noticeably during our hour-long tests, and every loose-cushion design needed periodic fluffing. Morrison and Rex also make shorter sitters work around long seat depths; Rex adds a very low seat that increases the effort of standing. Richard solves the depth problem but its 30-inch overall height will disappoint anyone who wants a tall, pillow-heavy back. Livingston has the fewest body-fit compromises, although its cushion feel is clearly medium-soft rather than firm.
Simpli Home Sofa vs alternatives
Why choose these Simpli Home models? The four reviewed sofas pair webbing-and-spring support with loose or bench-style cushioning, and they cover a useful range from upright fabric seating to oversized leather lounging. Livingston and Richard are the practical choices; Morrison and Rex make more sense when depth and visual presence are the priority.
Crate & Barrel Axis 2-Seat 88-Inch Sofa: The 88-inch Axis offers more upholstery and size choices, plus a 43-inch overall depth that feels even more lounge-oriented than Morrison or Livingston. Choose it when customization matters enough to justify the generally higher regular price and larger front-to-back footprint.
IKEA KIVIK: KIVIK is the strongest lower-cost alternative for deep fabric seating. Its replaceable, washable fabric covers are easier to live with than the leather options here, but the finish and cushion feel are more casual than Morrison or Richard.
Article Sven 88-inch leather sofa: The Sven is closest to Morrison in size and mid-century style. Its listed 24-inch seat depth is slightly easier to manage, while the tufted bench creates a sharper look but also adds seams that require more careful cleaning.
Pro tips for Simpli Home Sofa
-
If you’re between options, choose by seat depth first, not overall width. It has the biggest effect on whether you can sit upright or naturally recline.
-
For deep seats like Morrison and Rex, keep a lumbar pillow nearby so upright sitting stays comfortable.
-
Rotate and fluff loose cushions weekly to keep support consistent.
-
For leather models, keep them out of direct sun and avoid placing heat sources nearby to reduce drying and fading.
-
Use a throw or washable topper during snack-heavy movie nights to reduce day-to-day cleaning load.
-
After a long sit, stand for two minutes and check whether the cushion has regained its height before sitting again.
-
If Rex feels too low, a firm seat cushion can raise the sitting position and make standing easier.
-
Measure your doorway and turn radius before delivery; long frames and modular pieces can surprise you.
-
If you run warm, prioritize woven-blend fabric over leather for long, mostly stationary sitting sessions.
FAQs
Which Simpli Home sofa is the best all-around pick?
Livingston is the best all-around choice. Its depth fit the widest range of testers, the fabric stayed coolest, and the loose covers were easiest to spot-clean—useful advantages for mixed-height households.
Which model is best for deep lounging and stretching out?
Rex gives you the widest deep-seat layout, but Morrison delivers a similarly relaxed position in a far more manageable 88.8-inch-wide frame.
Do any of these work well for upright laptop work?
Richard is the best option for upright laptop work because its lower seat and manageable depth kept our testers from sliding forward. Livingston is the better choice if you want a softer seat.
What’s the easiest upholstery to live with day to day?
Livingston’s fabric and zip-off covers were the most forgiving during routine spot cleaning. The leather surfaces wiped clean quickly, but they need regular care and prompt spill cleanup.