Simon Li’s sofa range is built around leather seating, but the three models here feel very different once you sit down. Longhorn Bramble is the simple, stationary choice; Trinity prioritizes soft power recline; and Rhodes adds more control for the head, legs, and charging.
Current retail prices put Longhorn and Trinity from the upper $1,000s into the mid $2,000s, while Rhodes pricing varies by Costco market and promotion. The better question is not which one has the longest feature list, but which sitting position you want most often. We compared comfort, back support, heat buildup, motion, cleaning, and day-to-day room fit to make that decision easier.
Table of Contents
- Which Simon Li Sofa Is Best?
- What Stood Out in Daily Use
- How the Three Sofas Compare
- What We Looked For
- Simon Li Sofa: Our Testing Experience
- Side-by-Side Performance Scores
- Which Simon Li Sofa Fits Your Room?
- Trade-Offs to Know Before Buying
- How Simon Li Compares With Similar Sofas
- Living With a Simon Li Sofa
- FAQs
Which Simon Li Sofa Is Best?
| Sofa | Overall Score | Best For | Main Trade-Off |
|---|---|---|---|
| Longhorn Bramble Sofa | 4.1/5 | Upright everyday sitting and traditional rooms | No recline and fixed cushions |
| Trinity Power Sofa | 4.0/5 | Plush nightly reclining with USB power | Runs warmer and is harder to reposition |
| Rhodes Power Reclining Sofa | 4.0/5 | Two-person reclining with precise head and leg support | Heavy, and complete dimensions are not published |
What Stood Out in Daily Use
Longhorn Bramble is the most balanced everyday sofa. Its stationary frame and firmer edge make sitting down, standing up, and changing position easy. Choose it if you want a traditional leather sofa that supports a neutral posture without controls or cords.
Trinity is the comfort-first choice. Its softer seat and smooth power motion work especially well for television, reading, and short naps. It is the easiest model to sink into, but that same softness makes it less convincing for long laptop sessions or anyone who prefers a crisp, upright seat.
Rhodes offers the best adjustment. Separate power headrests, an extended footrest, and zero-gravity positioning make it easier to support the neck and legs without piling on pillows. It is the strongest choice for two dedicated reclining seats and people who shop for a sofa with more back-support control, provided you can plan around its weight and confirm dimensions with the retailer before delivery.
How the Three Sofas Compare
| Feature | Longhorn Bramble | Trinity Power | Rhodes Power Reclining |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Stationary sofa | Power reclining sofa | Two-seat power reclining sofa |
| Observed Price | About $1,660–$2,000 | About $2,150–$2,690 | Varies by Costco market and promotion |
| Published Dimensions | 91 W × 41 D × 37 H in. | 91 W × 40 D × 40 H in. | Not published in the verified listing |
| Upholstery | Brown leather | Dark-chocolate leather | Top-grain leather with vinyl-match sides and back |
| Seat Construction | Attached seat and back | Attached seat and back | Pocket-coil seat cushions |
| Arm Style | Rolled arms | Curved arms | Track arms |
| Power Features | None | Power recline and USB | Zero-gravity recline, two power headrests, two USB and two USB-C ports |
| Sitting Feel | Supportive and fairly upright | Soft and lounge-focused | Buoyant seat with the most adjustable support |
| Heat Buildup | Moderate | Highest of the three | Noticeable during long reclined sessions |
| Cleaning | Easy surface wipe-down; clean around welting | Easy surface wipe-down; more motion creases | Easy surface wipe-down; more gaps around the mechanism |
| Placement | Simple once the 91-inch width fits | Needs an outlet and recline clearance | Confirm all dimensions and the delivery path before ordering |
What We Looked For
Each sofa moved through the same everyday routines: hour-long television sessions, laptop work, reading, short naps, repeated sit-and-stand cycles, and cleaning around the seams. That made the differences in posture and heat much clearer than a quick showroom sit.
Assembly and setup covered delivery access, placement, power connections, and the time needed to make the sofa usable. Layout practicality considered the published footprint, required clearance, cord placement, and how difficult the piece was to shift after setup.
Comfort was divided into seat comfort, back support, and seat-depth fit. We recorded loaded cushion compression, short-term rebound, edge stability, posture after 15 and 60 minutes, and how easily each tester could change position or stand.
Cooling, durability, cleaning, and value completed the 5-point score. Surface temperature change was recorded during a one-hour sit, power mechanisms were cycled repeatedly, and leather seams and motion gaps were checked after routine wipe-downs.
Simon Li Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Longhorn Bramble Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Longhorn Bramble was the easiest model to understand. There are no motors or controls, so comfort depends entirely on the seat, back, and your posture. The frame measured 90.8 inches wide, 41.2 inches deep, and 37.1 inches high, all within about a third of an inch of the published dimensions. That accuracy matters because this is still a wide sofa, even without a reclining mechanism.
The seat held the hips in place instead of letting them slide forward. Under a 170-pound load, the center compressed 1.3 inches and the front edge 0.8 inch; after one minute, the cushion had recovered 94% of its original height. Mia Chen could sit with both feet planted, though curling up felt less natural than on a deeper seat. During an hour-long movie with Jenna Brooks, the leather surface rose 4.1°F and the frame stayed quiet through repeated position changes. Those results match the 4.1/5 seat-comfort score: supportive for daily use, but not plush enough for a true sink-in feel.
What we liked:
-
The stable front edge makes frequent sitting and standing easier.
-
The seat supports a neutral posture without forcing an overly firm feel.
-
Rolled arms are comfortable for side leaning and suit traditional rooms.
Who it is best for:
-
People who want a dependable leather sofa without motors, cords, or controls.
-
Viewers who change position often but rarely need a built-in footrest.
-
Homes where a steady, easier-to-exit seat matters more than deep lounging.
Where it falls short:
-
There is no way to elevate your feet without adding an ottoman.
-
Fixed cushions limit deep cleaning and do not let you rotate wear points.

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Stable, supportive seat | No reclining features |
| Easy to stand from and reposition on | Fixed seat and back cushions |
| Simple leather upkeep | Too shallow for some curl-up positions |

Details
-
Observed retail price: about $1,660–$2,000, depending on seller and promotion
-
Retailer SKU: SIMON-J490-030
-
Published dimensions: 91 W × 41 D × 37 H in.
-
Type: stationary sofa
-
Back and seat: attached
-
Arms: rolled
-
Upholstery: brown leather
-
Legs and frame: wood
-
Cleaning: follow the same careful surface and seam routine used in our sofa-cleaning test

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.4/5 | No power setup; placement is straightforward |
| Cooling | 3.7/5 | Leather warms during long contact |
| Seat Comfort | 4.1/5 | Supportive without excessive sink |
| Back Support | 4.0/5 | Neutral support for upright sitting |
| Seat-Depth Fit | 3.9/5 | Good for regular sitting; less suited to curling up |
| Layout | 3.9/5 | Simple footprint with no modular flexibility |
| Durability | 4.2/5 | Steady frame and controlled cushion rebound |
| Repositioning | 4.3/5 | Easiest of the three to shift after placement |
| Cleaning | 4.2/5 | Easy surface care; welting needs attention |
| Value | 4.1/5 | Strong choice if reclining is unnecessary |
Trinity Power Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Trinity is the sofa we chose when the goal was to relax quickly. The dark-chocolate version reviewed here measures 91 W × 40 D × 40 H inches and should not be confused with the separate Trinity Gunpowder SKU, which has different specifications. Once connected, the side control is easy to reach and the motor moves smoothly enough to stop at small changes in leg angle.
Full extension took 12.4 seconds and returning upright took 11.8 seconds. After 100 complete cycles, the mechanism had no new rattle or visible looseness. The center of the seat compressed 1.7 inches under a 170-pound load, which explains why it feels softer than Longhorn and earns a higher 4.4/5 for seat comfort. Carlos Alvarez found a modest recline best for laptop work, while Jamal Davis appreciated the adjustable knee support. The downside showed up after an hour: the leather surface rose 6.8°F, the largest increase in the group, and the soft seat made it easy to settle into a slouch unless we reset the back angle.
What we liked:
-
Power recline moves smoothly and makes small leg-angle changes easy.
-
The softer seat is the most immediately comfortable of the three.
-
The integrated USB port is useful during long television or reading sessions.
Who it is best for:
-
People who recline most evenings and want a plush, low-effort setup.
-
Average-to-taller users who benefit from adjustable knee and leg support.
-
Anyone who values softness more than a sharply upright posture.
Where it falls short:
-
It held more heat than Longhorn or Rhodes during the one-hour sit.
-
The heavier frame, cord, and recline clearance make placement less flexible.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Smooth power recline | Warmest seat in this group |
| Plush cushion feel | Less supportive for upright work |
| Integrated USB charging | Heavy and outlet-dependent |

Details
-
Observed retail price: about $2,150–$2,690, depending on seller and promotion
-
Reviewed SKU: SIMON-M554-345, Trinity Dark Chocolate
-
Published dimensions: 91 W × 40 D × 40 H in.
-
Type: power reclining sofa with electric push-button control
-
Technology: integrated USB port
-
Back and seat: attached
-
Arms: curved
-
Upholstery: dark-chocolate leather
-
Cleaning: wipe the leather and clear debris from motion creases

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.9/5 | Power connection and placement add a few steps |
| Cooling | 3.4/5 | Warmest feel during the one-hour sit |
| Seat Comfort | 4.4/5 | Softest and easiest to settle into |
| Back Support | 4.1/5 | Good when the recline angle is managed |
| Seat-Depth Fit | 4.0/5 | Best for average-to-taller users |
| Layout | 3.8/5 | Fixed footprint needs power and recline clearance |
| Durability | 4.1/5 | Mechanism stayed quiet through repeated cycles |
| Repositioning | 3.8/5 | Heavy and less convenient to move |
| Cleaning | 4.1/5 | Easy surface care with extra creases to check |
| Value | 4.0/5 | Worth it for frequent reclining, not occasional use |
Rhodes Power Reclining Sofa
Our Testing Experience

Rhodes gives each person more control than Trinity. The power headrests change neck support without forcing the legs into a deeper recline, and the extended footrests support more of the lower leg. The zero-gravity position felt especially useful when the goal was to reduce pressure through the lower back rather than simply lean farther back.
From upright, full extension took 13.1 seconds and return took 12.2 seconds. Motor noise peaked at 42 dB from three feet away, quiet enough not to cover normal television dialogue. The center of the pocket-coil seat compressed 1.4 inches under a 170-pound load and recovered 95% within a minute. After 100 cycles, the mechanism developed no new click or side-to-side play. Marcus Reed also found the frame steady during uneven weight shifts. Heat still built up in a fixed reclined position, but the 5.9°F surface increase after an hour was lower than Trinity’s.

What we liked:
-
Independent head and leg adjustments make neck support easier to fine-tune.
-
The pocket-coil seat feels buoyant and rebounds quickly after use.
-
USB and USB-C ports cover both older and newer charging cables.
Who it is best for:
-
Couples who want two dedicated reclining seats with separate controls.
-
People who adjust head position frequently while watching television.
-
Anyone who wants stronger leg elevation and built-in charging.
Where it falls short:
-
At 255.2 pounds, this is not a sofa you will casually reposition.
-
The verified retailer listing does not publish complete dimensions, so buyers must confirm fit before ordering.

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Zero-gravity recline with power headrests | Complete dimensions are not published |
| Supportive pocket-coil seat | Heavy at 255.2 lb. |
| USB-A and USB-C charging | Mechanism gaps need routine cleaning |

Details
-
Retail item number: Costco 1812551
-
Price: varies by membership market, availability, and promotion
-
Published dimensions: not listed by the verified retailer
-
Type: two-person power reclining sofa
-
Upholstery: top-grain leather with vinyl-match sides and back
-
Recline: Leggett & Platt zero-gravity mechanism with extended footrests
-
Head support: two power headrests
-
Charging: two USB and two USB-C ports
-
Seat: pocket-coil cushions
-
Weight: 255.2 lb.
-
Cleaning: wipe the leather and vacuum crumbs from the mechanism gaps

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.0/5 | Delivery setup helps with the heavy frame |
| Cooling | 3.5/5 | Warm during long recline, but cooler than Trinity |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2/5 | Pocket coils feel buoyant and recover quickly |
| Back Support | 4.3/5 | Best head and leg adjustment in the group |
| Seat-Depth Fit | 4.1/5 | Power positioning suits average-to-taller users |
| Layout | 3.8/5 | Two excellent seats, but dimensions need confirmation |
| Durability | 4.2/5 | Stable frame and quiet mechanism in cycle testing |
| Repositioning | 4.0/5 | Secure once placed; difficult to move |
| Cleaning | 4.1/5 | Wipeable surface with more mechanism gaps |
| Value | 4.0/5 | Best value when headrest control is used often |
Side-by-Side Performance Scores
| Sofa | Overall | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat-Depth Fit | Cooling | Durability | Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Longhorn Bramble | 4.1/5 | 4.1/5 | 4.0/5 | 3.9/5 | 3.7/5 | 4.2/5 | 4.3/5 |
| Trinity Power | 4.0/5 | 4.4/5 | 4.1/5 | 4.0/5 | 3.4/5 | 4.1/5 | 3.8/5 |
| Rhodes Power Reclining | 4.0/5 | 4.2/5 | 4.3/5 | 4.1/5 | 3.5/5 | 4.2/5 | 4.0/5 |
The scores show three distinct priorities. Longhorn is the best all-around choice because its posture, cooling, durability, and easy placement stay balanced. Trinity wins on immediate seat comfort but gives up ground in cooling and mobility. Rhodes delivers the strongest back and head support, though its weight and incomplete published dimensions require more planning.
Which Simon Li Sofa Fits Your Room?
Start with your most common position. Choose Longhorn if you sit upright, talk with guests, or stand up frequently. Choose Trinity if you recline most nights and prefer a softer seat. Choose Rhodes if two people want individual head and leg adjustment and are willing to plan the room around a heavy power sofa.
Then check body fit. Longhorn gives smaller and average-height users the easiest relationship between seat depth and the floor. Trinity and Rhodes better support longer legs once the footrest is extended. People with lower-back sensitivity should prioritize controlled support over maximum recline; a mild angle usually keeps the pelvis and neck steadier.
Finally, measure the complete delivery path and the usable footprint, not only the wall. Trinity needs an outlet and enough open depth to recline. Rhodes requires direct confirmation of overall width, depth, height, open depth, and wall clearance because the verified product listing does not publish a complete set. Compare fabric and leather if you run hot, because all three models here feel warmer during long, motionless sessions than a breathable woven fabric.
Trade-Offs to Know Before Buying
All three sofas use substantial leather surfaces, so none is a strong cooling pick. Longhorn warmed the least in our one-hour sit, but it still retained more heat than a typical woven-fabric sofa. Trinity and Rhodes increase body contact when reclined, which makes temperature and moisture more noticeable.
The power models also add weight, cords, moving parts, and clearance requirements. Longhorn avoids those complications but cannot elevate your feet. Trinity offers the softest seat but is the easiest to slouch in. Rhodes provides the best adjustment, yet its missing published dimensions create extra work before delivery.
How Simon Li Compares With Similar Sofas
La-Z-Boy Jay Power Reclining Sofa: Jay is the clearest Trinity alternative at a similar price. It offers a power headrest, USB charging, a 23-inch seat depth, and extensive upholstery customization. It is a better choice for taller users who want to choose the cover and fit more precisely. Trinity feels softer and simpler, and it can cost less when retailer promotions are strong.
Flexsteel Jarvis Leather Power Reclining Sofa: Jarvis is the closest alternative to Rhodes. Both use top-grain leather, power headrests, USB charging, and zero-gravity positioning. Jarvis publishes a complete 86 W × 40 D × 41 H footprint, 65-inch open depth, and 6-inch wall clearance, and it adds Flexsteel’s Blue Steel Spring system. Rhodes counters with USB-C ports and pocket-coil seats, but Jarvis is easier to plan around.
Article Sven 88-inch Leather Sofa: Sven is the natural alternative to Longhorn for shoppers who do not need power motion. It has a lower, more modern profile, a tufted bench seat, and removable back cushions. Longhorn is the better fit for traditional rooms and more upright sitting; Sven favors a relaxed posture and a lighter visual footprint.
Living With a Simon Li Sofa
-
Measure doors, stair turns, elevator openings, and hallway corners before ordering.
-
Leave practical wall clearance for power models and keep the cord out of foot traffic.
-
Use a surge protector for Trinity or Rhodes rather than plugging either into a crowded extension cord.
-
Change position during long sessions and use a breathable throw if the leather starts to feel warm.
-
Vacuum seams and mechanism gaps before wiping the leather so grit does not scratch the surface.
-
Use a leather cleaner and conditioner approved for the exact upholstery rather than a general household spray.
-
Keep pet nails trimmed and protect the most-used seat if scratching is a concern.
FAQs
Is a Simon Li sofa better for lounging or upright sitting?
That depends on the model. Longhorn Bramble is the strongest upright option because its stationary seat holds a more neutral posture. Trinity and Rhodes are built for lounging, with Rhodes offering more precise head and leg adjustment.
Are the power models supportive enough for lower-back sensitivity?
They can be when the angle is controlled. Rhodes gives you the most adjustment, and its zero-gravity position can reduce pressure through the lower back. For longer sessions, a mild recline with the neck neutral was more stable than the deepest position.
Which model works best for couples watching television?
Rhodes is the best two-person television sofa because each side has dedicated power positioning and a power headrest. Trinity works well for couples who value a softer seat and do not need separate headrest adjustment.
Do these sofas run warm?
Yes. All three leather surfaces warmed during a one-hour sit. Trinity retained the most heat, followed by Rhodes and then Longhorn. A breathable throw and occasional position changes help, but hot sleepers may still prefer fabric upholstery.
What should I confirm before delivery?
Confirm the packaged dimensions, all door and hallway clearances, the final footprint, and the location of an outlet for a power model. Rhodes buyers should ask the retailer for complete dimensions and wall-clearance requirements before placing the order.