Serta’s lineup is built around compact, apartment-friendly sofas and straightforward sleeper designs. In our testing, the fixed sofas were the easiest for everyday sitting and work-from-the-couch routines, while the convertibles earned their keep when you actually needed a real overnight setup. Seat depth, back support, and how the upholstery held up week after week were the deciding factors.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78" Copenhagen Sofa | 4.2/5 | Compact footprint; supportive seat; machine-washable covers | Seat depth can feel short for tall loungers; pillow-back needs fluffing | Small living rooms, home offices, everyday sitting | $369.99 |
| 78" Palisades Sofa | 4.1/5 | Clean track-arm look; steady, upright-friendly sit; easy to reposition | Spot-clean care is less forgiving; arms feel firm during long movie nights | Minimalist rooms, multipurpose spaces, upright sitting | $375.99 |
| Monroe 72.6" Convertible Sleeper Sofa | 3.9/5 | Guest-ready versatility; deeper seat; stable, solid feel | Heavier and deeper than it looks; back support varies by mode | Den/guest-room hybrids, frequent overnight guests | $1,035.00 |
| Hans Pullout Sofa Bed | 3.7/5 | Deep lounge seat; full-size presence; converts to a queen bed | Large footprint; slipcover look isn’t removable; higher price | Primary lounge sofa that can sleep guests | $1,599.99 |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the four models, the two compact fixed sofas were the easiest to live with day to day. They were quick to assemble, easy to place, and consistently supportive for laptop work and TV.
The sleepers were more versatile, but that flexibility comes with extra weight, deeper seating, and more posture management. Copenhagen was our simplest everyday pick, while Palisades felt firmer and more upright. Among the sleepers, Monroe offered the most balanced value, and Hans delivered the deepest lounge feel but was the hardest to move and the least forgiving to clean.
Serta Comparison Chart
| Comparison Item | 78" Copenhagen Sofa | 78" Palisades Sofa | Monroe 72.6" Convertible Sleeper Sofa | Hans Pullout Sofa Bed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Fixed sofa | Fixed sofa | Convertible sleeper (sofa/lounger/bed) | Convertible sleeper (queen bed) |
| Seat depth | 20.5 in | 20.5 in | 23.4 in | 24.8 in |
| Seat height | 20.0 in | 20.0 in | 19.7 in | 20.5 in |
| Overall size | 78"W x 32.5"D x 35"H | 78"W x 32.5"D x 35"H | 72.6"W x 37.6"D x 39.6"H | 90.6"W x 38.5"D x 37.4"H |
| Configuration options | Single piece | Single piece | Sofa/lounger/queen bed positions | Pullout queen bed |
| Frame and seat build | Wood frame; coil + foam seat feel | Wood frame; coil + foam seat feel | Solid wood frame; coil-based seat construction | Metal + wood frame; coil + foam fill |
| Fabric type | Polyester | Polyester (bonded-leather options exist) | Polyester | Linen |
| Perceived firmness | Medium, supportive with gentle give | Medium-leaning-firm, more “upright” | Medium, with position-dependent support | Medium-plush, deeper sink-in feel |
| Back support impression | Good, but pillow-back needs dialing in | More stable “set” posture; firmer arms | Decent in sofa mode; varies in lounger | Comfortable but can invite slouching |
| Cooling / breathability | Average, depends on room temp | Average, slightly warmer during long sits | Average; fabric is practical, not airy | Better airflow feel from linen surface |
| Ease of cleaning | Highest (cover care is forgiving) | Good (spot/wipe), less forgiving than Copenhagen | Good (spot-clean focus; stain-resistant positioning) | Moderate (spot-clean; slipcover look not removable) |
| Layout practicality | Excellent for small rooms | Excellent for small rooms | Good, but deeper footprint | Fair; large footprint dominates layouts |
How We Tested It
We assembled each sofa and then lived with it like a normal household would—nightly streaming, laptop work, quick naps, and friends dropping by.
For scoring, we tracked assembly effort, cooling during long sits, comfort (seat feel, back support, and seat-depth fit), durability cues (frame feel and cushion recovery), layout practicality (including the footprint changes that come with sleeper conversions), cleaning friction, and overall value. Marcus Reed focused on edge support and heat build-up, Jenna Brooks and Ethan Cole ran shared-use scenarios to see how each sofa handled movement and sprawl, and Dr. Adrian Walker weighed in on long-sit ergonomics.
Serta: Our Testing Experience
78" Copenhagen Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

The Copenhagen felt like the kind of sofa you can drop into after work and immediately find a usable posture. I started upright with my laptop, then slid into a semi-recline, and the seat kept a steady, supportive feel instead of turning into a saggy hammock. Marcus did his usual edge-perch test to tie shoes and then stood up fast; the front edge stayed composed enough that he didn’t feel the frame “dip.” When Jenna and Ethan shared a movie night, it handled small shifts without the whole seat turning into a wave, but the pillow back needed occasional reshaping to keep the upper back supported. After a week of normal use, the cushions still rebounded predictably, which mattered for my lower-back sensitivity.
What we liked:
- Supportive seat that stays usable across posture changes
- Compact proportions that don’t crowd a room
- Machine-washable cover care that keeps maintenance simple
Who it is best for:
- People who sit upright often (work, reading, gaming)
- Small-space layouts where depth matters more than “lounge sprawl”
- Anyone who wants a steady seat feel without constantly adjusting cushions
Where it falls short:
- Taller loungers who want a deeper “legs up” seat depth
- Anyone who dislikes pillow-back maintenance
- People who want a sink-in, plush lounge vibe

Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Compact 78-inch width fits tight rooms | Seat depth is not ideal for deep lounging |
| Supportive seat feel for laptop work and TV | Pillow back needs regular fluffing/positioning |
| More forgiving care approach versus many upholstery fabrics | Not the most “plush” sensation for nap-first users |

Details:
- Price: $369.99
- Seating capacity: 3
- Overall dimensions: 35"H x 78"W x 32.5"D
- Seat dimensions: 64"W x 20.5"D x 20"H
- Seat cushion thickness: 7.5 in
- Frame: wood; spring support noted in listing
- Upholstery: polyester
- Cushion materials: high-density foam and pocket coils
- Cushion type: loose seat and back cushions
- Weight capacity: 600 lbs
- Product weight: 90 lbs
- Assembly: adult assembly required; no tools needed
- Cleaning: machine washable cover; spot/wipe clean
- Return period: 90 days
- Warranty: 1-year limited
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.8 | Fast, low-friction setup with minimal fuss |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.7 | Comfortable in normal rooms; warms up in long sits |
| Seat Comfort | 4.1 | Supportive seat with enough give for movie nights |
| Back Support | 3.8 | Pillow-back comfort is good once positioned correctly |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | Great for upright sitters; just short for tall loungers |
| Layout Practicality | 4.7 | Compact size fits more rooms without compromises |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.5 | Easy to nudge, rotate, and re-center during cleaning |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | Most forgiving maintenance experience in this lineup |
| Durability | 3.8 | Holds form well, but still a light, compact build |
| Value | 4.4 | Strong everyday usefulness for the entry price |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Best all-around daily sofa for small-space living |
78" Palisades Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

The Palisades felt more “controlled” than Copenhagen—less rounded, more squared-off, and a touch firmer in how it held posture. I noticed it most when I tried to lounge: the track arms and the overall geometry encouraged a more upright spine instead of letting me melt into the corner. That was good for my lower back during laptop work, but during a long movie I had to be more deliberate about where my shoulders landed. Marcus tested the front edge and the arm-as-pillow move; the edge stayed dependable, but the arm read firmer on the neck than he’d prefer for a doze. Jenna and Ethan did a shared sit with frequent repositioning, and the sofa stayed stable—movement didn’t travel dramatically, and the seating area didn’t feel twitchy.
What we liked:
- Upright-friendly posture that stays consistent
- Stable feel when two people shift around
- Compact size that still seats three without feeling cramped
Who it is best for:
- People who prefer a slightly firmer, “tidier” sit
- Multipurpose rooms where the sofa is used for work and TV
- Households that move furniture occasionally for cleaning or layout tweaks
Where it falls short:
- People who want soft arms for side-leaning naps
- Anyone who dislikes spot-clean-only care routines
- Deep-lounge sitters who want more seat depth

Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Track arms and geometry support upright sitting | Arms feel firm for side-leaning naps |
| Stable shared-use experience during repositioning | Less forgiving cleaning approach than Copenhagen |
| Compact size works in small living rooms and offices | Seat depth is not built for full lounge sprawl |

Details:
- Price: $375.99
- Seating capacity: 3
- Overall dimensions: 35"H x 78"W x 32.5"D
- Seat dimensions: 64"W x 20.5"D x 20"H
- Seat cushion thickness: 7.5 in
- Frame: wood; listing notes spring support and a solid build approach
- Upholstery: polyester (bonded-leather options exist)
- Seat construction: pocket-coil seat cushions with high-density foam noted in listing
- Cushion type: loose / removable cushions
- Weight capacity: 600 lbs
- Product weight: 81.57 lbs
- Assembly: adult assembly required; no tools needed
- Cleaning: spot/wipe clean
- Return period: 90 days
- Warranty: 1-year limited
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.8 | Quick setup, minimal steps |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.6 | Fine for short sits; warmer during long sessions |
| Seat Comfort | 4.0 | Supportive, slightly firmer feel than Copenhagen |
| Back Support | 3.8 | Good posture control, less “sink and relax” |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | Best for upright sitting; average for deep lounging |
| Layout Practicality | 4.6 | Small-space friendly proportions |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.5 | Light enough to reposition without a struggle |
| Cleaning | 3.7 | Spot-clean reality requires more discipline |
| Durability | 3.8 | Holds shape well; still a compact-weight build |
| Value | 4.2 | Strong daily utility for the price point |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Best for people who want a firmer, upright sit |
Serta Hans Pullout Sofa Bed
Our Testing Experience:

Hans is the one that changes the feel of the room. The seat is deeper and the footprint is larger, so it reads more like a ‘main sofa’ than a compact placeholder. For lounging, the extra depth makes it easy to tuck your legs up or settle in, but that same depth can flatten your posture unless you add a lumbar pillow.
What we liked:
- Deep seat that’s genuinely comfortable for lounging
- Full-size presence with a pullout queen for guests
- More breathable surface feel than many basic polyester fabrics
Who it is best for:
- Homes that want one sofa for everyday use and overnight guests
- Taller loungers who feel cramped on shallow seats
- Rooms where the sofa will stay put once it’s placed
Where it falls short:
- Smaller rooms that can’t spare the extra depth and width
- Anyone who relies on removable slipcovers for mess control
- People who want consistent lumbar support without extra pillows

Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Deep seat encourages true lounging | Big footprint is harder to place in tight rooms |
| Converts to a queen bed for guests | Slipcover look is not removable |
| Sturdy feel under shifting and sprawl | Heavy to move and reposition |

Details:
- Price: $1,599.99
- Seating capacity: 3
- Overall dimensions: 37.4"H x 90.6"W x 38.5"D
- Seat dimensions: 78.7"W x 24.8"D x 20.5"H
- Seat cushion thickness: 7.1 in
- Frame: metal and wood
- Upholstery: linen
- Fill material: 20% pocket coils, 80% polyurethane foam
- Feature: converts to a bed
- Bed size: queen
- Mattress core: innerspring
- Mattress thickness: 7.1 in
- Weight capacity: 600 lbs
- Product weight: 269.3 lbs
- Assembly: adult assembly required; tools provided
- Cleaning: spot/wipe clean
- Return period: 90 days
- Warranty: 1-year limited
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.9 | More involved and heavier than fixed sofas |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.1 | Surface feel stays more breathable in long sits |
| Seat Comfort | 4.3 | Deep lounge comfort is the standout |
| Back Support | 3.6 | Best with added lumbar support for long sessions |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.5 | Great for tall loungers; too deep for many shorter users |
| Layout Practicality | 3.7 | Needs space; dominates smaller rooms |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.2 | Weight makes “quick moves” unrealistic |
| Cleaning | 3.4 | Spot-clean reality plus non-removable slipcover look |
| Durability | 4.2 | Substantial build and stable feel under load |
| Value | 3.3 | Functionality is strong, but price is a hurdle |
| Overall Score | 3.7 | Best for deep-lounge buyers who accept the footprint |
Serta Monroe 72.6" Convertible Sleeper Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

Monroe felt the most ‘purpose-built’ in daily use. The different positions actually make sense if you host guests, and the seat has a structured feel that stays stable when you shift, lean, or switch spots. It’s deeper than the compact fixed sofas, so it’s easier to lounge, but the back support changes depending on which mode you’re in.
What we liked:
- Convertible positions that are practical in real guest-room use
- Deeper seat that works for lounging and stretching out
- Stable feel under movement and weight shifts
Who it is best for:
- Homes that host overnight guests regularly
- People who want a deeper seat than compact fixed sofas
- Den or office spaces that need a sofa that can become a bed
Where it falls short:
- Buyers who want the lightest, easiest sofa to move
- Anyone who needs the same upright support in every position
- Small rooms where sleeper depth crowds walking paths

Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Multiple functional positions (sofa/lounger/bed) | Deeper footprint than compact sofas |
| Strong structural feel and good stability | Back support varies by mode and posture |
| Better sleeper value than larger premium options | Heavier to reposition than fixed sofas |

Details:
- Price: $1,035.00
- Seating capacity: 3
- Overall dimensions: 39.6"H x 72.6"W x 37.6"D
- Seat dimensions: 19.7"H x 60"W x 23.4"D
- Bed dimensions: 60"W x 78"D x 19.7"H
- Upholstery: polyester
- Frame: solid wood
- Motion functionality: manual push-back recline noted
- Weight capacity: 600 lbs
- Product weight: 183.7 lbs
- Minimum door clearance: 29 in
- Included: toss pillows
- Durability positioning: stain resistant noted
- Cleaning: spot-clean focused care instructions
- Assembly: required; tools included; two-person setup suggested
- Return period: 30 days
- Warranty: 1 year (limited)
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.0 | Manageable, but best with two people |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.8 | Comfortable for most rooms; not especially airy |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Deep, relaxing seat that works for lounging |
| Back Support | 3.8 | Good in sofa mode; less consistent when reclining |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.7 | Deeper seat is great for tall users, tricky for shorter |
| Layout Practicality | 3.9 | Works well, but sleeper depth affects walkways |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.6 | Not painful, but not “light and easy” either |
| Cleaning | 3.8 | Practical fabric focus; still a spot-clean reality |
| Durability | 4.2 | Stable frame feel and good support cues |
| Value | 4.1 | Strong sleeper utility for the price tier |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | Best sleeper pick if you’ll actually use the bed function |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78" Copenhagen Sofa | 4.2 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 4.5 |
| 78" Palisades Sofa | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 3.8 | 4.5 |
| Monroe 72.6" Convertible Sleeper Sofa | 3.9 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 3.6 |
| Hans Pullout Sofa Bed | 3.7 | 4.3 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 3.2 |
The two compact fixed sofas scored most consistently for day-to-day use, with Copenhagen slightly ahead on overall ease. Monroe stayed close behind thanks to strong durability and sleeper value, even though it’s heavier to handle. Hans delivered the best lounge comfort, but its practicality score dropped because the size and weight are harder to live with in a smaller space.
How do you choose a Serta sofa?
Start with how you sit. If you mostly sit upright for work or prefer a neat posture, the two compact fixed sofas are the safer pick. If you lounge with your legs up or host overnight guests, focus on the sleepers. Next, measure room depth and walking paths—deeper sleeper designs can quietly eat up space. As a quick shortcut: Copenhagen is the easiest everyday fit for small rooms, Palisades is the better choice if you like a firmer sit, Monroe is the practical sleeper for frequent guests, and Hans is for buyers who want a bigger lounge feel and can accommodate the footprint.
Limitations
This lineup is strongest in compact sizing and practical convertibility, not in premium upholstery upgrades or ultra-soft ‘cloud’ seating. Copenhagen and Palisades can feel shallow for taller loungers who want a deep, feet-up seat. Hans is a poor match for frequent movers or households that need removable slipcovers. Monroe is less ideal if you want a lightweight sofa or the same upright back feel in every position.
Serta Vs. Alternatives
- Why choose these models: compact sofas that fit tight rooms, sleeper options that add guest capacity, and straightforward comfort for everyday routines.
- Alternatives to consider: IKEA FRIHETEN for storage-first versatility; Article Nordby Sofa Bed for a modern sleeper feel; Joybird Eliot Sleeper Sofa for higher-end customization.
Pro Tips for Serta
- Measure more than width—check walking paths around coffee tables and doorways, especially with deeper sleepers.
- If you’re under 5'6", plan on a lumbar pillow for deeper seats so your lower back doesn’t round.
- On pillow-back sofas, reshape and rotate the back cushions weekly to keep support consistent.
- Add felt pads before first placement; it makes future small adjustments much easier.
- For spot-clean fabrics, blot quickly, avoid scrubbing, and keep a fabric-safe cleaner on hand.
- If you host guests, keep a fitted sheet and a thin mattress pad nearby so setup stays frictionless.
- On compact sofas, a narrower coffee table helps preserve knee and shin clearance.
- If you share a sofa often, test movement during a long movie—some designs amplify shifting over time.
- If you run warm, use breathable throws and avoid thick, heat-trapping toppers on sleeper surfaces.
FAQs
Which Serta sofa felt best for everyday sitting?
Copenhagen was the easiest everyday pick in our group: supportive, compact, and simple to live with for work and TV.
Which one is best if I host overnight guests often?
Monroe is the most balanced option for frequent guests because the conversion feels reliable without sacrificing everyday stability.
Are the compact sofas too small for tall users?
If you’re near or above 6 feet tall, Copenhagen and Palisades may feel shallow for long lounging sessions because of the seat depth.
Which sofa handled movement best when two people shared it?
Copenhagen and Palisades stayed the most composed when two people shifted positions, while the sleepers took more effort to ‘dial in’ for shared comfort.