Nova Sofa leans glam-forward: bold curves, velvets and boucles, and shiny metal accents. For this roundup, I used our how we test sofas rubric and focused on day-to-day comfort, back support, heat buildup, durability, cleaning effort, layout practicality, and overall value. The lineup works best when you want a room to feel “done” quickly, but the deeper silhouettes and textured fabrics can be less forgiving for pets, low-maintenance households, or shorter loungers.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bonita Ivory Boucle Sofa | 3.9/5.0 | Supportive “structured lounge” feel; sculptural look | Boucle can snag; runs a bit warm | Style-first living rooms that still need daily comfort |
| Helena Ivory Velvet 94" Sofa | 3.8/5.0 | Strong upright posture support; slimmer depth | Velvet shows pressure marks; less “sprawl” depth | Work-on-the-sofa and movie nights with back support |
| Santana Ivory Velvet Sofa | 3.8/5.0 | Cozy, lounge-friendly depth; pillow-rich comfort | Pillows can dilute lumbar support; more upkeep | Relaxed TV setups and guest-ready styling |
| Lauren Pink Velvet Double Chaise 136" Sectional | 3.7/5.0 | Big-group lounging; true “hangout” footprint | Massive space needs; cleaning seams take time | Entertaining, families, and full-stretch reclining |
Testing Team Takeaways
Bonita felt like the most balanced day-to-day option—supportive enough for regular sitting, but still comfortable when you want to lean back and stay awhile. Helena was the best fit for upright posture, especially for laptop work and long sits. Santana delivered the easiest “sink in and watch” vibe, but it asked more of you in pillow arranging to keep lumbar support consistent. Lauren was the clear crowd-pleaser for hosting and full-stretch lounging, though its size and tufted velvet details made it the most hands-on to keep tidy.
Nova Sofa Comparison Chart
| Comparison item | Bonita Ivory Boucle Sofa | Helena Ivory Velvet 94" Sofa | Santana Ivory Velvet Sofa | Lauren Pink Velvet Double Chaise 136" Sectional |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Varies | Varies | Varies | Varies |
| Overall dimensions | 91" W x 44" D x 31" H | 94" W x 31" D x 33" H | 89" W x 38" D x 29" H | 136" W x 69" D x 32" H |
| Configuration options | Standard sofa | Standard sofa | Standard sofa | U-shaped, double chaise sectional |
| Upholstery | Boucle fabric | Ivory velvet | Alcantara velvet | Velvet |
| Frame material | Hornbeam wood | Hardwood | Hornbeam wood | Hornbeam wood |
| Seat depth (measured) | - | - | - | - |
| Seat height (measured) | - | - | - | - |
| Seat depth feel (testing) | Deep-leaning, lounge-friendly | Medium, easier upright posture | Deep, “movie-night” friendly | Very deep across chaise zones |
| Back cushion style | Tight back | - | - | Tight back |
| Included pillows | - | Accent pillows included | 8 pillows (set) | 8 pillows |
| Legs | Hidden/minimal | Gold-finished metal legs | Stainless steel gold legs | Gold-finished metal legs |
| Assembly | - | - | Leg assembly required | Leg assembly required |
| Cooling / breathability (testing) | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate-low | Moderate-low |
| Ease of cleaning (testing) | Medium (texture traps debris) | Medium-low (velvet shows marks) | Medium-low (fabric + pillows) | Low (tufting + seams) |
| Durability feel (testing) | Stable, holds shape well | Stable, consistent support | Stable, more “plush drift” | Stable, but heavy/immovable |
How We Tested It
I put each piece through the same weekly routine: delivery and setup, daily sit sessions, longer binge-watch blocks, and quick-reset cleaning checks.
We scored Assembly by time and tools required; Cooling by heat buildup after extended lounging; Comfort by pressure points and posture drift; Durability by early cushion change and frame feel; Layout Practicality by room fit and traffic flow; Cleaning by debris capture and spot-clean friction; and Value by how the experience stacked up against typical street pricing.
Nova Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Bonita Ivory Boucle Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Bonita was the sofa I kept defaulting to after work. It feels supportive without turning rigid, and the seat stayed consistent through repeat sit cycles. I could ease into a semi-recline without my hips creeping forward, which made it easy to read or watch TV without constantly resetting my posture. Marcus Reed tested the edge right away and didn’t get that unstable “drop-off” sensation when perching to tie shoes. Mia Chen enjoyed curling up, but she noticed the depth works better with a small lumbar pillow if you’re shorter or like your feet planted.
What we liked
-
Consistent seat feel that didn’t mush out during long sessions
-
Strong edge confidence for quick perching and stand-ups
-
Curved silhouette that still works for real lounging
Who it is best for
-
Style-forward homes that still need daily TV and reading comfort
-
People who prefer a supportive “hold” rather than a sink-in seat
Where it falls short
-
Boucle texture can snag and holds onto lint and pet hair
-
Deep feel can be awkward for shorter legs without a lumbar pillow
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Supportive, structured lounge feel | Boucle can snag and trap debris |
| Solid edge confidence | Can feel deep for petite users |
| Sculptural look fits glam/contemporary rooms | Not the coolest fabric after long sessions |
Details
-
Size: 91" W x 44" D x 31" H
-
Cushion firmness: Medium-firm (perceived)
-
Frame: Hornbeam wood
-
Cushion style: Tight seat; tight back
-
Fabric type: Boucle
-
Cooling / breathability: Moderate (testing)
-
Ease of cleaning: Medium (testing)
-
Pet-friendliness: Medium-low (snag risk)
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.2 | Minimal setup friction in our routine |
| Cooling | 3.6 | Comfortable, but boucle held warmth over long sits |
| Comfort | 4.1 | Supportive seat with low “slide-forward” drift |
| Durability | 4.2 | Held shape well through repeat sit cycles |
| Layout Practicality | 3.8 | Big presence; works best with breathing room |
| Cleaning | 3.4 | Texture traps lint and needs more frequent upkeep |
| Value | 4.2 | Strong experience at the price point |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | Most balanced daily-use option |
Helena Ivory Velvet 94" Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Helena became my go-to “work couch.” The slimmer depth makes upright sitting feel natural, so laptop sessions didn’t turn into a slow slide into a rounded lower back. Carlos Alvarez called out that the back support felt steady even when he shifted between upright and a relaxed lean. Marcus Reed liked the planted, predictable feel, though the profile isn’t built for full sprawl the way the deeper pieces are.
What we liked
-
Upright posture felt easy to maintain for work sessions
-
Consistent support across long sits with fewer cushion readjustments
-
Clean, polished look with metal-leg lift
Who it is best for
-
People who split time between laptop work and TV
-
Anyone who dislikes very deep seats
Where it falls short
-
Velvet shows pressure marks and requires more careful brushing/spot care
-
Less ideal for full stretch-out lounging compared to deeper models
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong posture support for long sits | Velvet shows marks and needs more care |
| Slimmer depth fits smaller rooms | Less “sprawl” depth for napping |
| Stable feel under bigger bodies | Can feel formal if you want a sink-in seat |
Details
-
Size: 94" W x 31" D x 33" H
-
Upholstery: Ivory velvet
-
Legs: Gold-finished metal
-
Frame: Hardwood
-
Cushion fill: High-density foam
-
Pillows: Included
-
Cooling / breathability: Moderate (testing)
-
Ease of cleaning: Medium-low (testing)
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.0 | Straightforward setup in our routine |
| Cooling | 3.5 | Velvet held warmth after extended use |
| Comfort | 4.0 | Supportive, less posture drift for work |
| Durability | 4.1 | Consistent feel; frame stayed stable |
| Layout Practicality | 4.0 | Depth was easier in tighter rooms |
| Cleaning | 3.3 | Velvet shows marks and needs gentler maintenance |
| Value | 4.0 | Strong “daily driver” performance for the money |
| Overall Score | 3.8 | Best for posture-focused seating |
Santana Ivory Velvet Sofa
Our Testing Experience
Santana read as the dedicated “movie-night sofa.” The deeper profile makes it easy to settle in fast, but the soft, pillow-forward styling means lumbar support depends on how you set it up. I felt great in the first stretch, then started tweaking pillows to keep my lower back from flattening out. Carlos Alvarez liked the plush feel but ended up moving pillows around to avoid neck-forward pressure during longer sessions. Marcus Reed appreciated the solid base and the way the arms frame the seating zone, even if it asked for more daily straightening.
What we liked
-
Easy to relax into, especially for long TV sessions
-
Pillows let you customize support and lounging angles
-
Solid, grounded feel when shifting positions
Who it is best for
-
Households that want a softer, lounge-forward vibe
-
People who like stacking pillows for comfort
Where it falls short
-
Lumbar support depends on how you arrange pillows
-
Velvet-style upkeep is more hands-on than flat weaves
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Lounge-friendly depth and cozy feel | Pillow-dependent lumbar support |
| Statement arms and glam styling | More daily “reset” and fabric care |
| Stable base feel | Not ideal for hot loungers |
Details
-
Size: 89" W x 38" D x 29" H
-
Upholstery: Alcantara velvet
-
Frame: Hornbeam wood
-
Legs: Stainless steel gold legs
-
Included pillows: 8 (set)
-
Assembly: Leg assembly required
-
Cooling / breathability: Moderate-low (testing)
-
Ease of cleaning: Medium-low (testing)
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.1 | Leg setup was simple and predictable |
| Cooling | 3.4 | Fabric held warmth during long lounging |
| Comfort | 4.0 | Cozy, but support depends on pillow setup |
| Durability | 4.0 | Frame feel was stable; cushions need routine fluffing |
| Layout Practicality | 4.1 | Comfortable depth without an extreme footprint |
| Cleaning | 3.2 | Fabric and multiple pillows add upkeep time |
| Value | 4.0 | Strong comfort per dollar if you like plush styling |
| Overall Score | 3.8 | Best for relaxed TV-first lounging |
Lauren Pink Velvet Double Chaise 136" Sectional
Our Testing Experience
Lauren turned the living room into a hangout zone. The double-chaise layout makes it easy for multiple people to stretch out without negotiating for legroom, and everyone naturally gravitated to a favorite corner. Marcus Reed loved the sprawl factor but flagged how quickly the big footprint changes traffic flow in the room. Mia Chen liked nesting into the corner, but the depth meant she wanted a pillow behind her back sooner than on the slimmer sofas.
What we liked
-
Massive lounge space that works for groups
-
Deep, cozy seating that encourages full recline
-
Pillows help tune comfort across zones
Who it is best for
-
Entertaining, big households, or dedicated media rooms
-
People who prioritize stretch-out comfort over compact living
Where it falls short
-
Requires significant floor space and limits rearranging
-
Velvet tufting/seams take more time to maintain cleanly
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Best-in-group lounging and hosting | Very large footprint |
| High comfort for full recline | Harder to move and reposition |
| Glam statement piece | More cleaning time due to tufting and seams |
Details
-
Overall size: 136" W x 69" D x 32" H
-
Pieces: Left chaise 68.89" W; armless loveseat 60.62" W; right chaise 68.89" W
-
Upholstery: Velvet
-
Configuration: U-shaped, double chaise; symmetrical
-
Frame: Hornbeam wood
-
Legs: Gold-finished metal
-
Pillows: 8 included
-
Assembly: Leg assembly required
-
Cooling / breathability: Moderate-low (testing)
-
Ease of cleaning: Low (testing)
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 3.9 | More pieces and positioning steps, though legs are simple |
| Cooling | 3.3 | Deep velvet lounging ran warmer over time |
| Comfort | 4.4 | Highest lounge comfort and stretch-out usability |
| Durability | 4.1 | Stable feel and shape retention in daily use |
| Layout Practicality | 3.6 | Big footprint restricts room flow in smaller spaces |
| Cleaning | 3.1 | Tufting, seams, and size increase upkeep time |
| Value | 3.8 | Great experience, but you pay for the footprint |
| Overall Score | 3.7 | Best for big-room lounging, not small-space living |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bonita Ivory Boucle Sofa | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 4.2 | 3.8 |
| Helena Ivory Velvet 94" Sofa | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| Santana Ivory Velvet Sofa | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.7 | 3.9 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 3.7 |
| Lauren Pink Velvet Double Chaise 136" Sectional | 3.7 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 4.1 | 3.4 |
The numbers tell a clean story: Bonita is the most even “all-rounder,” Helena leads for upright back support and day-to-day posture, Santana trades structure for a softer lounge vibe, and Lauren dominates for raw comfort while conceding points on space, cleaning, and repositioning. If you want the fewest compromises, Bonita and Helena are the safest; if you want a room to behave like a social lounge, Lauren is the commitment piece.
How to Choose the Nova Sofa?
Start with how you actually sit. If you do upright laptop work, a steadier, shallower seat usually feels better; if you want to fully recline, extra depth and flexible pillows matter more. Next, match the footprint to your room—sectionals reward open layouts, and big curved silhouettes need breathing room around walkways. Finally, be honest about upkeep. Textured boucle and velvet can look rich, but they typically ask for more routine care than smoother weaves. For petite loungers or anyone who dislikes deep seats, Helena is the easiest fit. For mixed-use daily seating, Bonita is the most balanced. For relaxed TV-first comfort, Santana is the softest-feeling option. For big families and hosting, Lauren is built for everyone to pile on.
Limitations
The main trade-offs across this lineup are fabric maintenance and seat depth. Boucle can snag and hold debris, while velvet can show marks and feel warmer during long lounge sessions. Depth is also a real fit issue: what feels luxuriously loungey for one person can feel awkward for someone shorter or posture-focused.
In practice, Bonita is a tougher sell for high-shed pets or anyone who wants quick, low-effort cleaning. Helena isn’t the best choice if you want deep chaise-style sprawl. Santana is less ideal if you need consistent lumbar support without pillow adjustments. Lauren is a poor fit for tight living rooms, frequent furniture rearranging, or anyone who wants fast, effortless cleaning.
Nova Sofa Vs. Alternatives
-
Why choose these models
-
Bold glam styling with statement legs, tufting, and sculptural silhouettes
-
Solid frame materials commonly listed across the collections (hornbeam/hardwood mixes)
-
Big-lounge configurations available without custom ordering (notably the double-chaise sectional)
-
-
Alternatives to consider
-
Article Sven Sectional: cleaner lines, easier-to-style neutrals, typically simpler maintenance
-
Burrow Nomad Sofa: modular flexibility for apartments and frequent moves
-
West Elm Harmony: softer, sink-in feel with broad fabric choices for different upkeep needs
-
Pro Tips for Nova Sofa
-
Measure doorways, stair turns, and elevator depth before ordering—deep sectionals are where surprises happen.
-
Use a throw or washable cover on the main seat zone to cut cleanup time on boucle or velvet.
-
If you sit upright often, add a small lumbar pillow; deep seats feel better when your hips aren’t chasing the backrest.
-
Rotate cushions and swap “favorite seat” positions to reduce early wear patterns.
-
If you have pets, vacuum with a brush attachment a couple of times a week—texture fabrics trap debris quickly.
-
Keep a soft upholstery brush around for velvet to reset the nap and reduce visible marks.
-
Put felt pads under metal legs to prevent scuffs and reduce micro-shifts on hard floors.
-
If you run warm, use breathable throws and consider a small fan for long TV sessions.
-
For sectionals, tape out the footprint on the floor first and confirm you still have comfortable walking lanes.
FAQs
Which Nova Sofa model is best for long hours of laptop work?
Helena felt the most supportive for upright sitting, with a depth that made it easier to hold posture without sliding forward.
Which model is most comfortable for full-body lounging and naps?
Lauren offered the most true stretch-out space, while Bonita was the best single-sofa option for lounging without losing structure.
Are boucle and velvet hard to maintain day to day?
They’re manageable, but plan on more routine vacuuming and spot care than you’d do with smoother weaves; velvet also tends to show pressure marks more easily.
Which choice is best if I don’t like very deep seats?
Helena was the easiest fit without constant pillow adjustments, and it stayed comfortable in a more upright posture.
