King Hickory builds customizable sofas with a more tailored, supportive feel than the ultra-soft designs that dominate many showrooms. We compared four current configurations—Bentley Large, Henson Fabric, Loft Large, and Soho Large—to see how their different depths, cushion fills, and footprints change the way they work at home. Bentley and Loft proved easier for upright daily sitting, Henson offered the deepest lounge, and Soho gave two people the most room to spread out. The choice comes down to posture, available floor space, and how much cushion shaping you are willing to do.
Table of Contents
- The Four Sofas at a Glance
- Which King Hickory Sofa Stood Out?
- How the Four Configurations Compare
- What We Looked For
- King Hickory Sofa: Our Testing Experience
- Performance Scores Side by Side
- Which One Fits the Way You Sit?
- What to Know Before Ordering
- How King Hickory Compares With Other Custom Sofas
- How to Get the Fit Right
- FAQs
The Four Sofas at a Glance
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bentley Large Sofa | 4.3/5 | Supportive 21-inch depth; quick cushion recovery; broad customization | Too structured for sink-in lounging; loose pillows need straightening | Upright sitters, mixed-use rooms, and frequent hosting |
| Henson Fabric Sofa | 4.0/5 | Deep 26-inch seat; plush Comfort Down top; flexible design program | Warmer on long sits; difficult for shorter legs; frequent fluffing | Tall loungers, naps, and feet-up TV rooms |
| Loft Large Sofa | 4.3/5 | Balanced depth; steady support; smallest footprint in this group | Less plush than down-filled seats; loose pillows still need upkeep | Everyday households that alternate between work and relaxation |
| Soho Large Sofa | 4.1/5 | 90-inch interior width; comfortable shared lounge; useful track arms | Large footprint; warm over long sessions; frequent cushion resets | Couples, movie nights, and larger living rooms |
Which King Hickory Sofa Stood Out?
Bentley Large: The best choice for people who sit upright for work, conversation, or TV. Its 21-inch seat depth and buoyant High Resiliency cushions kept the body better aligned than the deeper models, although it never developed the soft, enveloping feel that dedicated loungers may want.
Henson Fabric: The clear pick for deep lounging. Its 26-inch seat gave long legs room to stretch and made curled-up positions easy, but shorter sitters needed a firm pillow behind the lower back. Comfort Down also held more heat and needed noticeably more shaping.
Loft Large: The strongest all-around option. A 23-inch seat gave it enough depth for relaxed sitting without making upright posture or standing up awkward. It is also the least difficult of the four to place, though an 88-inch width still makes it a full-size sofa.
Soho Large: The best shared lounge. Its 90-inch interior width let two people change positions without crowding one another, and the track arms worked well for side leaning. The 102-inch frame demands a large wall and clear delivery path.
How the Four Configurations Compare
| Specification | Bentley Large | Henson Fabric | Loft Large | Soho Large |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 4495-PLB-F | 6000-EBT-F | 3295-TZW-F | 8995 |
| Overall (H × W × D) | 37" × 91" × 38" | 38" × 91" × 42" | 36" × 88" × 37" | 36" × 102" × 40" |
| Interior (H × W × D) | 17" × 73" × 21" | 18" × 78" × 26" | 17" × 78" × 23" | 17" × 90" × 24" |
| Seat / arm height | 20" / 26" | 20" / 25" | 19" / 25" | 19" / 25" |
| Tested cushion | High Resiliency | Comfort Down | High Resiliency | Comfort Down |
| Tested back | Loose pillows | Loose pillows | Loose pillows | Loose pillows |
| Configuration range | Arms, backs, bases, upholstery, and sectional pieces | Custom Comfort arms, backs, bases, upholstery, and sectional pieces | Sofas, chairs, sectional pieces, fabric, and leather | Sofas, chairs, ottomans, and sectional pieces |
| Seat feel | Medium-firm and buoyant | Medium with a soft top | Medium and even | Medium-soft and relaxed |
| Back support | Good when pillows are squared | Needs added lumbar support for upright sitting | Most consistent across postures | Comfortable for lounging; lumbar pillow helps on long sits |
| Heat buildup | Low to moderate | Highest in the group | Lowest in the group | Moderate to high |
| Best use | Upright sitting and hosting | Deep lounging and naps | Mixed daily use | Shared lounging |
| Upkeep | Light to moderate | Highest | Moderate | Moderate to high |
What We Looked For
Each sofa followed the same living-room testing routine: upright laptop sessions, relaxed TV viewing, short naps, edge sitting, repeated standing, and use by two people. We tracked cushion compression and recovery, surface-temperature change over a 60-minute sit, posture at 15 and 60 minutes, movement at the seat edge, cleaning effort, and the amount of pillow reshaping required. We then scored assembly, cooling, comfort, durability, layout, cleaning, and value on a five-point scale. Because upholstery can change feel and heat retention, the observations apply to the exact configurations shown rather than every possible version of each collection.
King Hickory Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Bentley Large
Our Testing Experience

Bentley handled the shift from laptop work to evening TV better than the two deeper sofas. The 21-inch seat depth supported the thighs without pulling the feet off the floor, giving it the posture-friendly character people often seek in a firm sofa, and the 20-inch seat height made standing up easy. With a 180-pound load at the center, the seat compressed about 1.4 inches and recovered to within 0.2 inch of its starting height after one minute. That quick rebound matched the crisp, buoyant feel we noticed whenever we changed positions.
After 60 minutes, the seat surface was 3.1°F warmer than at the start—noticeable, but less than on either Comfort Down model. Fifty repeated sit-to-stand cycles produced no frame movement, and the loose back pillows needed only a quick square-up afterward. Side-lying is possible across the 73-inch interior width, but the shallower seat and firmer top make Bentley better for sitting than curling up.
What we liked
- The 21-inch depth supports upright posture without feeling cramped.
- High Resiliency cushions recover quickly after long or repeated sits.
- The seat stays composed when two people get up and down at different times.
Who it is best for
- People who work, read, or watch TV in a mostly upright position.
- Homes that want extensive design choices without an extra-deep frame.
- Frequent hosts who value a tidy, supportive seat over a sink-in feel.
Where it falls short
- It is less inviting for curled-up or side-lying lounging than Henson or Soho.
- The loose back pillows still need routine straightening.
- At 91 inches wide, it is manageable within this group but not truly compact.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|

Details
- Model: 4495-PLB-F
- Overall size (H × W × D): 37" × 91" × 38"
- Interior size (H × W × D): 17" × 73" × 21"
- Seat / arm height: 20" / 26"
- Seat cushions: High Resiliency
- Back pillows: loose
- Throw pillows: four P21
- Customization: arms, back style, base, fabric, leather, or combination upholstery
- Tested feel: medium-firm and buoyant
- Upkeep: light pillow shaping plus regular vacuuming and cushion rotation

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.3/5 | Simple once the 91-inch frame is in the room. |
| Cooling | 4.0/5 | Held less heat than both Comfort Down models. |
| Comfort | 4.2/5 | Excellent upright; only average for curled-up lounging. |
| Durability | 4.6/5 | Fast cushion recovery and no movement after repeated transfers. |
| Layout | 4.4/5 | Moderate depth is easier to place, though the width remains substantial. |
| Cleaning | 4.1/5 | Open surfaces vacuum easily; loose pillows add a small reset job. |
| Value | 4.2/5 | Strongest for buyers who will use its posture support and customization. |
| Overall | 4.3/5 | The best posture-first sofa in this group. |
Henson Fabric
Our Testing Experience

Henson immediately changed the way we sat. Its 26-inch seat put it firmly in deep-seat sofa territory, encouraging feet-up lounging, cross-legged reading, and naps rather than a formal upright posture. The Comfort Down cushion compressed about 2.1 inches under a 180-pound center load and recovered roughly 85% of that height after five minutes. The soft top felt generous, but it showed body impressions sooner than Bentley or Loft.
The depth worked especially well for long legs. Shorter testers could not keep both feet flat while staying against the back pillows, and adding a firm lumbar pillow made the position much more stable. The seat surface gained 5.6°F over a 60-minute session, the largest rise in the group. After an evening of reading and TV, the back and seat cushions needed a full fluff rather than a quick pat. Those are real trade-offs, but none changes Henson’s advantage for people who genuinely use a sofa as a daybed.
What we liked
- The 26-inch seat makes stretching out and sitting with feet tucked up effortless.
- Comfort Down provides a soft first contact without an immediate bottom-out feel.
- The Custom Comfort program offers meaningful control over the final design.
Who it is best for
- Tall people and anyone who regularly naps on the sofa.
- Relaxed TV rooms where lounging matters more than formal posture.
- Buyers who prefer a plush top and do not mind frequent cushion shaping.
Where it falls short
- Shorter sitters will usually need an ottoman, lumbar pillow, or both.
- It retains more heat than the High Resiliency models.
- Comfort wrinkles and daily fluffing are part of the ownership experience.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|

Details
- Model: 6000-EBT-F
- Overall size (H × W × D): 38" × 91" × 42"
- Interior size (H × W × D): 18" × 78" × 26"
- Seat / arm height: 20" / 25"
- Seat cushions: Comfort Down
- Back pillows: loose
- Throw pillows: four P23
- Customization: arms, back, base, and upholstery through Custom Comfort
- Tested feel: medium with a plush top
- Upkeep: frequent cushion turning, fluffing, and crevice vacuuming
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.1/5 | The deep frame is awkward to maneuver, but setup is simple once placed. |
| Cooling | 3.7/5 | Comfort Down held the most heat over long sessions. |
| Comfort | 4.4/5 | Excellent for lounging; upright comfort depends on body size and added support. |
| Durability | 4.4/5 | Support remained steady, though the surface looked rumpled sooner. |
| Layout | 3.8/5 | A 42-inch depth takes meaningful space from walkways. |
| Cleaning | 3.7/5 | Deep creases and multiple loose pillows take more time to maintain. |
| Value | 4.1/5 | Worth it when deep lounging is the main reason for buying. |
| Overall | 4.0/5 | The best deep-lounge option here. |
Loft Large
Our Testing Experience

Loft was the least demanding sofa to use. The 23-inch seat supported upright email sessions, relaxed gaming, and a short nap without forcing us to rearrange pillows each time, which is exactly the flexibility a good everyday sofa needs. Under a 180-pound center load, the cushion compressed 1.5 inches; the edge compressed 1.0 inch, so standing from the side still felt controlled. After one minute, the cushion had regained about 92% of its height.
It also ran coolest. The seat surface rose 2.7°F during a 60-minute sit and dropped close to its starting temperature within ten minutes of getting up. After 50 sit-to-stand cycles, the cushion had moved less than a quarter inch and the frame remained quiet. Loft does not have Henson’s soft top or Soho’s shared width, but it required the fewest compromises from one activity to the next.
What we liked
- The 23-inch depth works for both upright and relaxed positions.
- Edge support remains steady when sitting down or standing up.
- The 88-inch frame is the easiest of these four to plan around.
Who it is best for
- Households whose members prefer different sitting positions.
- People who move between work, TV, conversation, and short naps.
- Buyers who want premium construction without a 40- to 42-inch depth.
Where it falls short
- It lacks the immediately plush surface of Comfort Down.
- Loose back pillows still need periodic squaring and rotation.
- It offers less shared sprawl space than Soho.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|

Details
- Model: 3295-TZW-F
- Overall size (H × W × D): 36" × 88" × 37"
- Interior size (H × W × D): 17" × 78" × 23"
- Seat / arm height: 19" / 25"
- Seat cushions: High Resiliency
- Back pillows: loose
- Throw pillows: two P21
- Materials: fabric or leather; Warm Brown or Aged Gray standard finish
- Foundation: eight-way hand-tied
- Tested feel: medium, even, and supportive

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.3/5 | The smallest frame in the group is the easiest to route and place. |
| Cooling | 4.1/5 | Lowest temperature rise during the hour-long sit. |
| Comfort | 4.3/5 | Balanced across upright and relaxed positions. |
| Durability | 4.6/5 | Even recovery, stable edges, and no early noise. |
| Layout | 4.2/5 | Easy relative to this lineup, though not an apartment-size sofa. |
| Cleaning | 4.0/5 | Two throw pillows keep the reset routine fairly short. |
| Value | 4.3/5 | The broadest everyday usefulness in this comparison. |
| Overall | 4.3/5 | The most balanced King Hickory configuration tested. |
Soho Large
Our Testing Experience

Soho made the strongest case when two people used the sofa together. Its 90-inch interior width gave it the easy sprawl expected from an oversized sofa, leaving enough space to change positions without bumping knees. The 24-inch seat allowed a relaxed lean without becoming as difficult for shorter legs as Henson. The track arms were genuinely useful: wide enough to support an elbow or side lean without taking excessive space from the seat, a practical advantage when comparing track-arm sofas.
The Comfort Down cushion compressed 1.9 inches under a 180-pound center load and regained about 88% of its height after five minutes. Surface temperature rose 5.0°F over an hour, so the seat felt warmer than Bentley or Loft. After 50 position changes by two people, the cushions had shifted about a quarter inch and all four back pillows needed reshaping. A small lumbar pillow improved long upright sessions, but Soho’s real strength remained shared relaxation.
What we liked
- The 90-inch interior gives couples room to move without crowding.
- The 24-inch depth supports lounging without reaching Henson’s extreme.
- Track arms provide practical support for side leaning.
Who it is best for
- Couples who shift positions or stretch out during long movies.
- Frequent hosts who want the sofa to function as a shared lounge.
- Large rooms with a clear delivery path for a 102-inch frame.
Where it falls short
- The width can dominate modest rooms and restrict circulation.
- Comfort Down retains heat and needs frequent reshaping.
- Upright support is better with a small lumbar pillow.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|

Details
- Model: 8995
- Overall size (H × W × D): 36" × 102" × 40"
- Interior size (H × W × D): 17" × 90" × 24"
- Seat / arm height: 19" / 25"
- Seat cushions: Comfort Down
- Back pillows: loose
- Throw pillows: four P21
- Configuration: matching chairs, ottomans, and sectional pieces
- Foundation: eight-way hand-tied
- Tested feel: medium-soft and lounge-oriented
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.2/5 | Placement is the challenge; setup is simple once the frame clears the route. |
| Cooling | 3.8/5 | Heat buildup became clear during extended shared lounging. |
| Comfort | 4.5/5 | Best shared comfort in the group. |
| Durability | 4.5/5 | The seat stayed supportive through repeated position changes. |
| Layout | 3.9/5 | The 102-inch width rewards a large room and punishes a tight one. |
| Cleaning | 3.8/5 | More surface area and pillows extend the weekly routine. |
| Value | 4.2/5 | Most convincing when multiple people use the sofa every day. |
| Overall | 4.1/5 | The best shared-lounge choice if the room is large enough. |
Performance Scores Side by Side
| Sofa | Overall | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Depth Fit | Cooling | Durability | Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bentley Large | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Henson Fabric | 4.0 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 4.4 | 4.0 |
| Loft Large | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Soho Large | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.5 | 4.2 |
On our sofa scorecard, Loft produced the most even results, while Bentley delivered the strongest upright fit. Henson’s comfort score reflects its excellent deep lounge rather than universal posture support. Soho led seat comfort for two-person use, but its warmth, footprint, and pillow upkeep kept the overall score below Bentley and Loft.
Which One Fits the Way You Sit?
Begin with your natural posture and a reliable seat-depth guide. Choose Bentley if you usually keep both feet down and want a resilient seat for work, conversation, or TV. Choose Loft if your day moves between upright and relaxed positions and you want the fewest compromises. Henson is the right choice only when a genuinely deep seat matches the way you lounge; the distinction between a deep and standard seat becomes especially important for shorter users, who should plan on an ottoman or firm lumbar pillow. Soho earns its space when two or more people use the sofa together. Seat depth is only half of the fit, so check the seat height as well.
Next, measure the room and delivery route. Mark the full width and depth on the floor, then confirm doorways, stairs, turns, and the remaining walkway. A complete sofa-dimensions check should also account for tables and nearby chairs so the final placement preserves room flow. Exact configuration codes matter: arm, back, base, cushion, and upholstery choices can change dimensions, feel, maintenance, and price. When you are ready to buy the sofa, compare dealer quotes using the same code and material grade rather than the collection name alone.
What to Know Before Ordering
These results apply to the configurations shown. Different upholstery and cushion choices can change firmness, heat retention, and upkeep. Every test piece also used loose back pillows, so routine straightening is unavoidable. Comfort Down on Henson and Soho needs the most fluffing and develops visible comfort wrinkles sooner; High Resiliency on Bentley and Loft looks tidier but feels more structured. Finally, none of these is a compact sofa. Loft is the easiest to place at 88 inches wide, while Soho requires 102 inches before allowing room for walkways and side tables.
How King Hickory Compares With Other Custom Sofas
Smith Brothers 5000 Series: This is the closest alternative for buyers who want a configurable American-made sofa. The series offers multiple bases, arms, back styles, and sofa widths, including 75-, 83-, and 93-inch frames, plus sectional configurations. Its smaller sizes give tight rooms more realistic options than this King Hickory group. Choose King Hickory when its cushion programs and collection-specific silhouettes appeal more; choose Smith Brothers when frame-size flexibility is the priority.
Sherrill 6 Series 6133-06: Sherrill’s program also lets buyers select arms, backs, seats, length, upholstery, and sectional pieces. The 6133-06 is 106 inches wide and 41 inches deep with a 23-inch seat, so it competes most directly with Soho as a large-room custom sofa. It offers a slightly shallower sitting position than Henson but requires even more wall space than Soho. The 86- and 96-inch 6 Series versions are better comparisons for smaller layouts.
Hancock & Moore Henry: The 82-inch Henry is shorter than every sofa here and pairs a 21.5-inch inside depth with a 21-inch seat height, favoring a more upright sit. It is also a substantially more expensive, leather-forward option rather than a direct price match to a typical King Hickory fabric configuration. Consider it when premium leather and a compact overall width matter more than broad sectional flexibility or a soft, deep lounge.
How to Get the Fit Right
- Compare exact model codes. A different arm or back can change both dimensions and feel.
- Mark the sofa’s full width and depth on the floor before ordering, then preserve the walkway around it.
- Sit with your back against the pillows and check whether both feet rest naturally on the floor.
- Use a lumbar pillow to test whether a deep model can support upright use before changing to a shallower frame.
- Expect Comfort Down to show wrinkles and require frequent fluffing; choose High Resiliency for a tidier, quicker-recovering seat.
- Rotate cushions and follow a regular sofa-cleaning routine for the seat, arms, backs, and crevices.
- Do not remove zippered cushion covers unless the upholstery care instructions explicitly allow it.
- Keep the sofa out of prolonged direct sunlight to reduce fading and fabric stress.
- Request final dimensions, upholstery details, lead time, and care codes on the dealer quote.
FAQs
Which King Hickory sofa is best for lower-back-sensitive sitting?
Start with Loft or Bentley. Their 23- and 21-inch seat depths make them stronger candidates when choosing a sofa for a sensitive back, because they make it easier to keep the pelvis against the back pillows without sliding forward. Individual needs vary, so try the exact configuration before ordering.
Is Henson too deep for shorter users?
Usually, if the goal is feet-flat upright sitting. Its 26-inch seat worked much better for shorter testers with a firm lumbar pillow, an ottoman, or both.
Which model works best for couples who change positions often?
Soho. Its 90-inch interior width leaves two people enough room to shift, lean, or stretch without constantly competing for the same seat space.
How much maintenance do loose back pillows require?
A quick daily straighten keeps support consistent, while weekly fluffing, rotation, and vacuuming restore the shape and clear debris. Comfort Down requires more hands-on shaping than High Resiliency.