Daals Sofa Reviews: Greenwich, Richmond, Bromley, Chislehurst, Wimbledon, Marylebone Tested

I have watched the online furniture market shift rapidly over the last few years. Affordable design is no longer just about utility. It is about making a statement without draining your savings. I kept seeing Daals pop up in my feeds with trendy velvets and mid-century shapes. I wanted to see if the reality matched the pictures. My team and I decided to bring these sofas into our testing space. We needed to know if they could handle real life.

We do not just look at these couches. We live on them. I gathered my usual crew to put these pieces through the wringer. We have Marcus to test durability and Jamal to check legroom. Mia helps us understand the petite perspective. Jenna and Ethan test the couple dynamic. We sit, we nap, and we work. We want to find the breaking points.

We also have Dr. Adrian Walker checking our observations. He looks at ergonomics and posture. He does not sit on the furniture. He analyzes how our bodies react to it. Our goal is simple. We want to tell you how these sofas feel. We want to help you decide if a Daals sofa belongs in your living room.

Product Overview

Sofa Model	Pros	Cons	Ideal For	Price	Overall Score
Greenwich 3-Seater	Stylish velvet, deep color options, soft touch	Cushions soften quickly, low back support	Style-focused apartments	$$	4.2
Richmond Chesterfield	Classic aesthetic, firm seating, easy assembly	Rigid back, not for napping	Formal living areas	$$	4.0
Bromley Corner	Spacious layout, modular flexibility, good value	Thin arm padding, fabric can stretch	Families, hosting	$$$	4.3
Chislehurst Sofa Bed	Dual functionality, compact footprint, click-clack ease	Very firm sleep surface, shallow seat	Guest rooms, studios	$	3.9
Wimbledon 2-Seater	Compact size, retro design, sturdy frame	Narrow seating width, stiff initially	Small flats, home offices	$	4.1
Marylebone Boucle	Trendy texture, unique curves, cozy feel	Hard to clean, retains heat	Trend-setters, cozy corners	$$	4.0

daals sofa Comparison Chart

Feature	Greenwich	Richmond	Bromley	Chislehurst	Wimbledon	Marylebone
Width	195 cm	205 cm	240 cm (approx)	180 cm	140 cm	200 cm
Seat Depth	Medium (55 cm)	Shallow (50 cm)	Deep (60 cm)	Shallow (52 cm)	Medium (54 cm)	Deep (58 cm)
Seat Height	45 cm	46 cm	44 cm	42 cm	45 cm	43 cm
Upholstery	Velvet	Velvet / Faux Leather	Polyester Blend	Fabric / Velvet	Weave Fabric	Boucle
Fill Material	Foam + Fibre	High Density Foam	Foam	Firm Foam	Foam	Foam + Batting
Firmness	Medium-Soft	Firm	Medium	Firm	Medium-Firm	Medium
Leg Material	Wood (Tapered)	Wood (Turned)	Plastic / Wood	Metal / Wood	Wood	Hidden / Low
Assembly	Legs only	Legs + Back	Moderate	Minimal	Legs only	Minimal

What We Tested and How We Tested It

We established a strict routine for every sofa that entered our studio. I needed to ensure consistent data across different styles. We started with the setup phase to gauge assembly difficulty. Then we moved to the core sitting tests. Each team member spent at least two hours continuously on each model. We rotated positions every thirty minutes. We switched from upright posture to casual lounging.

We paid close attention to cushion behavior. We observed how the foam reacted after an hour of pressure. Marcus tested the frame rigidity by dropping his weight onto the seats. Mia checked the corners for curl-up comfort. Jenna and Ethan sat together to measure personal space. They shifted around to see if movement traveled across the frame. I used my laptop on every sofa to check for lumbar fatigue.

We also looked at fabric performance. We rubbed the upholstery to test for sensitivity. We checked for heat retention after long sessions. Dr. Walker reviewed our posture notes. He compared our feedback against ergonomic standards. We did not use machines for this. We used human bodies. We looked for the practical details that product photos often hide.

Testing Team Takeaways

I found the Daals lineup prioritizes aesthetics. They look fantastic in a room. However, I noticed a recurring theme with lower back support. Many models have lower profiles. This looks sleek but offers less shoulder support for me during work sessions. I had to use an extra pillow on the Greenwich. The seat depth generally felt comfortable for my average height. I appreciated the visual impact they bring to a space for the price.

Marcus Reed felt the frames were lighter than he prefers. He noted some flex in the Bromley when he sat heavily. The velvet on the Richmond felt warm to him after a football game. He liked the firmness of the Chislehurst for sitting. He struggled to get comfortable lying down on the smaller Wimbledon. The seat width on the compact models feels tight for my shoulders. He preferred the sectional for the extra room to sprawl.

Carlos Alvarez focused intensely on his spine alignment. He liked the Richmond's upright nature. It kept his posture checked. He found the Marylebone too unstructured for working. He struggled to find a good neck position on the low-back models. I can feel my neck straining when I try to watch a movie on the low-back ones. He suggested these are better for conversation than for marathoning TV series.

Mia Chen loved the deep seats on the Marylebone. She could tuck her legs up easily. The fabrics felt soft against her skin. She struggled with the seat depth on the Bromley. Her feet dangled a bit. She enjoyed the cozy corners of the Greenwich. I fit perfectly in the corner, but the fabric gets a little slippery in leggings. She found the aesthetics very appealing for her apartment style.

Jenna Brooks found the 2-seaters intimate. She and Ethan had to sit close on the Wimbledon. She liked the Bromley for the shared space. She felt Ethan move when he adjusted on the Chislehurst. The foam transfers motion quite a bit on the cheaper models. I definitely know when he is fidgeting on the sofa bed. She appreciated the style but wanted a bit more motion isolation.

Jamal Davis had trouble with the seat depth on the Chislehurst. His knees felt high. He liked the openness of the Bromley chaise. He found the armrests on the Greenwich a bit low for leaning. He had to slide down to rest his head. My legs just hang off the end of the smaller ones. He thought they were good value but maybe not for tall people to nap on.

Ethan Cole moved around constantly. He found the cushions on the Greenwich softened up fast. He liked the bounce in the Wimbledon. He struggled to get comfortable on the Richmond's hard buttons. He used the armrests as pillows often. The armrests are a bit hard for my head without a throw pillow. He liked the look but wanted more plushness for movie nights.

daals sofa reviews: Our Testing Experience

Greenwich 3-Seater Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I sat down on the Greenwich first. The velvet felt immediately smooth under my hands. I noticed the seat cushions gave way gently. It was a soft landing. I leaned back to type some notes. The backrest stopped at my mid-shoulders. I felt a slight gap behind my lower back. I grabbed a scatter cushion to fill it. It looked great in the room. The tapered legs gave it a nice lift.

Marcus took the spot next to me. The sofa dipped slightly toward his side. He shifted to find a solid spot. I feel like I am sliding a bit toward the middle. He liked the fabric texture but worried about heat. He sat on the edge to tie his shoe. The foam compressed significantly there.

Mia curled up in the corner later. She tucked her legs under her. The depth worked well for her. She rested her arm on the side bolster. This is a really nice spot for reading. She felt supported by the side arm.

Dr. Adrian Walker notes: The low back height here offers minimal thoracic support. Users with upper back tension may fatigue quickly without supplementary cushions.

I lay down for a quick rest. The length was good. I could stretch out fully. The armrest was hard under my neck. I needed a pillow. I noticed the velvet showed handprints easily. We brushed them out. The aesthetic value is high here. It feels like a lounge piece. It invites casual sitting.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Beautiful velvet finish	Cushions soften quickly
Stylish mid-century legs	Low back support
Good depth for lounging	Velvet shows marks
Easy leg assembly	Edge support is weak

Details:

• Price: Mid-range budget friendly

• Dimensions: W195cm x D88cm x H82cm

• Seat Depth: Approx 55cm

• Material: Polyester Velvet

• Filling: Foam and Fibre

• Legs: Dark wood, tapered

• Colors: Green, Blue, Grey, Orange

• Assembly: Screw on legs

• Warranty: 1 year manufacturer

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	4.3	Soft initial feel but support fades slightly over time.
Support	3.8	Low back limits shoulder support for taller users.
Durability	4.0	Fabric is tough, but cushion foam softens fast.
Design	4.8	visually stunning and fits modern decor perfectly.
Value	4.5	Excellent style for the price point.
Overall	4.2	A stylish choice for casual lounging.

Richmond Chesterfield Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I approached the Richmond expecting firmness. The tufted back looked rigid. I sat down and confirmed it. The seat cushions are dense. I sat very upright. My posture felt corrected immediately. I typed on my laptop for an hour. My back did not ache. The upright angle kept me focused.

Carlos joined me. He leaned back against the buttons. He nodded in approval. My spine feels straight against this backrest. He liked the lack of slouch. He noted the rolled arms were high. They supported his elbows well.

Ethan tried to lounge on it later. He slid down to watch a video. He complained about the buttons. The buttons dig into my back when I slouch. He tried to lie flat. The high arms bent his neck too much. It is not a napping couch.

Dr. Adrian Walker notes: The upright angle promotes a neutral spine position. However, the lack of lumbar contouring means the natural curve of the spine is not actively supported.

I tested the fabric. It felt durable. The velvet was tighter than the Greenwich. It seemed easier to clean. The sofa demands attention in the room. It feels formal. It is great for guests. It is less good for a Sunday lazy day.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Classic elegant look	Very firm seating
Good posture support	Not comfortable for napping
High armrests	Buttons can be hard
Durable fabric feel	Heavy to move

Details:

• Price: Mid-range

• Dimensions: W205cm x D90cm x H76cm

• Seat Depth: Approx 50cm

• Material: Velvet or Faux Leather

• Filling: High Density Foam

• Style: Chesterfield

• Assembly: Legs and back slide in

• Frame: Wood

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	3.5	Very firm; great for sitting, poor for lounging.
Support	4.5	Keeps posture upright and rigid.
Durability	4.2	Tight tufting keeps fabric secure.
Design	4.6	Timeless look that elevates a room.
Value	4.0	Good price for a complex design.
Overall	4.0	Best for formal sitting areas.

Bromley Corner Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I looked at the Bromley and saw potential chaos. It is a big piece. I sat in the corner section. It felt cavernous. I extended my legs onto the chaise. This is the relax zone. The fabric felt like a durable weave. It was a bit rougher than the velvet.

Jenna and Ethan piled on. They had plenty of room. Jenna sat on the chaise. Ethan took the end seat. We are not touching elbows, which is nice. They watched a show together. Jenna noted the cushions slid forward a bit. She had to push them back.

Marcus tested the frame. He sat heavily on the connecting joint. He felt a slight creak. It feels a little light when I drop my weight. He liked the space for his broad shoulders. He felt the armrest padding was thin. He could feel the wood underneath.

Dr. Adrian Walker notes: Corner units often encourage asymmetric sitting postures. Frequent rotation of sitting spots is recommended to avoid pelvic torsion.

I checked the cushion covers. They seemed removable. That is a plus for families. I napped on the long section. It was decent. The cracks between sections were noticeable. I had to lay a blanket down. It is a functional family beast.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Lots of seating space	Cushions slide forward
Good for lounging	Frame feels lightweight
Chaise option	Thin armrest padding
Removable covers (some)	Joint connectors can squeak

Details:

• Price: Higher end of budget

• Dimensions: Approx W240cm x D150cm (chaise)

• Configuration: L-Shape (Left or Right)

• Material: Polyester Weave

• Filling: Foam

• Legs: Short block legs

• Assembly: Connect sections, add legs

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	4.2	Great for sprawling out and relaxing.
Support	3.9	Cushions are medium, frame flexes slightly.
Durability	3.8	Fabric is tough, but structure is light.
Design	4.0	Simple, modern, and functional.
Value	4.6	Huge amount of seating for the money.
Overall	4.3	Top pick for families on a budget.

Chislehurst Sofa Bed

Our Testing Experience:

I needed to test the mechanism first. I pulled the Chislehurst back. It clicked down easily. It turned into a flat bed. I lay down on it. It was hard. Like sleeping on a carpeted floor. I sat back up. The seat is shallow when in sofa mode.

Jamal tried to sit. His knees projected far out. The seat depth was too short for him. I feel like I am perched on a bench. He stood up easily though. The height is decent. The firmness helped him push off.

Jenna tested it for guest potential. She lay on the open bed. She rolled over. The movement was stiff. I would need a mattress topper for a guest. She sat back down. The backrest is very upright. It does not invite you to sink in.

Dr. Adrian Walker notes: Sofa beds often compromise ergonomic seat contouring for the folding mechanism. The flat surface offers little lumbar engagement.

I converted it back to a sofa. It snapped into place loudly. It looks neat and tidy. It does not take up much room. It is strictly utilitarian comfort. It works for a studio apartment. It is not for a movie marathon.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Dual function	Very firm sleep surface
Compact footprint	Shallow seat depth
Easy mechanism	Stiff backrest
Affordable	minimal motion isolation

Details:

• Price: Budget friendly

• Dimensions: W180cm x D85cm (Sofa)

• Bed Size: Small Double

• Mechanism: Click-Clack

• Material: Fabric or Velvet

• Legs: Metal or Wood slanted

• Assembly: Legs only

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	3.2	Rigid as a sofa, hard as a bed.
Support	4.0	Firm foam offers high resistance.
Durability	4.0	Mechanism feels robust enough.
Design	4.0	Sleek, armless design saves space.
Value	4.5	Two furniture pieces in one price.
Overall	3.9	Practical solution for occasional guests.

Wimbledon 2-Seater Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I looked at the Wimbledon and saw retro charm. I sat down. It is small. I felt the sides hugging me immediately. The seat is firm but forgiving. I leaned back. The backrest is simple. It offered decent mid-back support.

Mia joined me. We filled the sofa. There was no space between us. It is cozy, but we are definitely close. She liked the height of the back. It fit her frame well. Her feet touched the floor perfectly.

Marcus tried it alone. He took up most of the space. He felt the arms digging into his thighs. It is too narrow for me to relax. He sat on the front edge. The frame held firm. It felt sturdier than the Bromley.

Dr. Adrian Walker notes: Compact sofas can restrict posture shifts. Users should stand up and move frequently since they cannot shift position easily on the seat.

I moved the sofa myself. It is light. That is a huge plus for renters. The fabric weave felt tight. It seems resistant to snagging. It is a great secondary seating option. It works well in a home office.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Great retro style	Narrow seating width
Fits small spaces	Stiff armrests
Sturdy feel	Not for sprawling
Easy to move	Limited cushion give

Details:

• Price: Budget

• Dimensions: W140cm x D80cm x H82cm

• Seat Capacity: 2 people

• Material: Woven Fabric

• Legs: Wood

• Colors: Grey, Blue, Mustard

• Assembly: Legs only

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	3.8	Good for sitting, bad for lounging.
Support	4.1	Firm seat keeps you upright.
Durability	4.3	Tightly woven fabric feels strong.
Design	4.5	Cute retro appeal.
Value	4.0	Solid build for a low price.
Overall	4.1	Ideal for apartments and offices.

Marylebone Boucle Sofa

Our Testing Experience:

I touched the boucle fabric first. It was knobbly and soft. I sat down. The Marylebone has a unique curve. It felt like a hug. The seat is deep and plush. I sank in more than the others. I felt relaxed instantly.

Carlos sat down cautiously. He looked for straight lines. He found curves. I cannot sit straight here. He leaned back and surrendered to the slouch. He noted the fabric trapped heat quickly. His back felt warm after twenty minutes.

Mia loved this one the most. She climbed in. The curved shape supported her knees when she sat cross-legged. It feels like a cloud. She worried about spilling coffee on it. The texture would be a nightmare to clean.

Dr. Adrian Walker notes: Soft, deep seats can lead to posterior pelvic tilt. This "slouching" strains the lumbar ligaments over time.

I noted the lack of traditional armrests. It flows into the back. I could not rest my elbows easily while typing. It is a social sofa. It is for chatting and drinking wine. It is not for working. It is a statement piece.

Pros & Cons:

Pros	Cons
Ultra-trendy look	Hard to clean fabric
Soft, cozy feel	Retains body heat
Unique curved shape	No defined armrests
Deep seating	Encourages slouching

Details:

• Price: Mid-High

• Dimensions: W200cm x D95cm curved

• Material: Boucle (White/Cream)

• Shape: Curved / Kidney

• Filling: Foam

• Legs: Hidden or low profile

• Assembly: Minimal

Review Score:

Metric	Score	Remarks
Comfort	4.5	Very plush and inviting initially.
Support	3.5	Lacks structure for proper posture.
Durability	3.5	Boucle can snag and flatten.
Design	5.0	A complete showstopper visually.
Value	3.8	You pay for the trendiness.
Overall	4.0	The choice for style-conscious buyers.

Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas

Sofa	Overall Score	Seat Comfort	Back Support	Seat Depth Fit	Cooling	Durability	Ease of Movement
Greenwich	4.2	4.3	3.8	4.2	4.0	4.0	4.1
Richmond	4.0	3.5	4.5	3.8	3.5	4.2	3.8
Bromley	4.3	4.2	3.9	4.1	4.1	3.8	4.4
Chislehurst	3.9	3.2	4.0	3.5	4.2	4.0	4.5
Wimbledon	4.1	3.8	4.1	4.0	4.3	4.3	3.9
Marylebone	4.0	4.5	3.5	4.4	3.0	3.5	3.5

The data shows a clear split. The Bromley wins on balance. It offers space and decent comfort. The Richmond dominates back support but fails on coziness. The Marylebone is the comfort king but lacks support. The Chislehurst is purely functional. The Greenwich bridges the gap well. It looks good and sits well. Cooling is generally average across the board. The weave fabrics breathe better than the velvet or boucle.

Best Picks

• Best daals Sofa for Families: Bromley Corner Sofa. This model earns the spot because it handles multiple people easily. The fabric is forgiving, and the price allows for real life to happen without fear.

• Best daals Sofa for Style: Greenwich 3-Seater. It balances a stunning mid-century look with genuine comfort. It transforms a room instantly and feels good enough for daily use.

• Best daals Sofa for Small Spaces: Wimbledon 2-Seater. It packs a lot of character into a tiny footprint. The firm seat and upright back make it a capable seating option that does not crowd the room.

How to Choose the daals sofa?

You need to assess your space honest first. Measure your room. Then subtract space for walking. Daals sofas vary wildly in depth. If you are tall like Jamal, avoid the Chislehurst. The seat is too shallow. Look at the Bromley or Marylebone instead.

Consider your primary activity. Do you nap? Skip the Richmond. The buttons hurt. Choose the Greenwich. Do you work from the couch? The Richmond or Wimbledon offer the back support you need.

Think about your household. If you have pets, velvet is risky. It attracts hair. The woven fabric on the Bromley hides sins better. If you have kids, avoid the white boucle Marylebone. It will not stay white.

Budget matters too. Daals is affordable, but the price jumps for sectionals. If you need maximum seating for minimum cash, the Bromley offers the best "seat per dollar" ratio.

Limitations

These sofas are budget-friendly designs. That comes with trade-offs. The foam density is not luxury grade. It will soften faster than a high-end brand. You might feel the frame on the arms of the cheaper models.

Delivery is often in boxes. You have to build them. Sometimes the holes do not line up perfectly. We struggled with one leg on the Greenwich. The fabrics are synthetic. They can generate static and heat. They do not breathe like natural linen or cotton.

They are not "forever" furniture. They are 5-to-7 year pieces. They fit a life stage perfectly. They are not heirlooms. If you weigh heavily like Marcus, you might find the seat cushions flatten quicker than expected.

Is the daals sofa worth it?

Yes, daals sofas are worth the investment for specific buyers. You get high-impact style for a low price. The visual appeal is undeniable. They replicate expensive trends effectively.

Renters and first-time buyers get the most value. You fill a room with style without debt. The comfort is adequate for daily lounging. The durability matches the price point.

However, value drops for heavy usage users. If you sit 8 hours a day, the foam may degrade. If you need orthopaedic support, look elsewhere. You pay for the look and the convenience. You are not paying for lifetime structural integrity.

FAQs

1. Are daals sofas difficult to assemble?

Most models are simple. You usually screw on legs. Some larger models like the Bromley require connecting sections. We found the instructions clear. It rarely takes more than thirty minutes.

2. Is the velvet fabric easy to clean?

Polyester velvet cleans reasonably well. You can wipe spills if you act fast. However, it attracts dust and pet hair aggressively. You will need a lint roller handy.

3. Do the seat cushions keep their shape?

They are foam-based. They will soften. We noticed initial softening within the first week. Regular plumping and rotating helps. Do not expect them to stay rigid for years.

4. Can tall people sit comfortably on these sofas?

It varies by model. The Greenwich is decent. The Chislehurst is too shallow. Tall users should check the seat depth. Anything under 55cm might feel like a perch.

5. How firm is the daals Richmond sofa?

It is very firm. It is a 8/10 on the firmness scale. It is not a sink-in couch. It is designed for upright sitting and formal entertaining.

6. Does daals offer fabric swatches?

Yes, they typically do. We highly recommend getting them. Screens distort colors. You need to feel the texture to know if it works for you.

7. Are the covers removable?

On some models like the Bromley, yes. On the fixed upholstery models like the Richmond or Greenwich, no. Check the specific product specs carefully if this is a dealbreaker.

8. Is the delivery fast?

They are a UK-based stockist. Items in stock usually ship quickly. We received ours within a standard window. They are not made-to-order, which speeds things up.

9. Can I sleep on the non-sofa-bed models?

The Greenwich is long enough for a nap. The Richmond is uncomfortable due to the buttons. The Bromley is great for sleeping if you like a firmer surface.

10. Do they squeak?

We heard minor creaks in the Bromley frame under heavy load. The solid wood frames like the Wimbledon were silent. Tightening the legs usually solves simple noises.