Clad Home is a premium custom-upholstery brand: you start with a silhouette, then choose the layout, fabric, cushion style, and fill that match how you actually use your living room.
That flexibility is the point—and it can also create decision fatigue. A well-chosen build can feel made for your room, while the wrong mix of depth and fill can miss the mark for everyday posture. For this sofa review, we focused on support, seat depth, heat build-up, cleaning a couch, and how the cushions held up over time across four silhouettes.
Table of Contents
Product Overview at a Glance
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melrose | 4.2 | Deep-lounge feel with cushions that bounce back | Depth can feel too long for petite sitters | Movie nights, naps, and full-body sprawl | $3,440–$11,220 |
| Westlake | 4.3 | Balanced support with classic roll arms | Not as “cloudy” as the plushest builds | Hosting, mixed postures, and classic rooms | $3,440–$11,220 |
| Aleta | 4.3 | Tall arms create a cozy, steady sit | Arms can feel bulky in small rooms | Reading, corner lounging, structured comfort | $3,200–$10,580 |
| Bedford | 4.1 | Plush, overstuffed comfort with a relaxed look | Needs regular fluffing to stay looking crisp | Soft landings and cozy traditional styling | $4,220–$13,710 |
Testing Team Takeaways
After rotating these four silhouettes through the same routine, one thing stood out: Clad Home works best when you already know how you like to sit. Seat depth, fabric, and fill have an outsized impact because you’re effectively building the comfort profile.
Melrose was our “sprawl and stay” pick. Westlake felt easiest for upright sitting that still relaxes, Aleta felt tucked-in for reading thanks to its tall arms, and Bedford had the plushest first impression. The trade-off with Bedford: it asked the most from us in cushion fluffing to keep the lines looking tidy.
Dr. Adrian Walker’s main caution was consistent across the group: very deep seats can pull your pelvis forward and flatten lumbar support—great for lounging, less ideal for long, upright sessions.
Clad Home Comparison Chart
| Spec / Test Note | Melrose | Westlake | Aleta | Bedford |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price range by layout | $3,440–$11,220 | $3,440–$11,220 | $3,200–$10,580 | $4,220–$13,710 |
| Layout options | Multiple layouts, from sofa to U-shaped sectional | Same | Same | Same |
| Silhouette cues | Deeper-than-average seat; double-stitched seams | English roll arms; camelback dip | Blocky cushions; tall arms | Overstuffed knife-edge cushions; flange detail |
| Perceived seat depth in use | Deep lounge; easiest to sprawl | Moderate; most “standard-fit” | Moderate; feels guided by tall arms | Medium-to-deep; plush front edge |
| Perceived firmness | Medium-plush | Medium; supportive | Medium; steady | Plush-medium; softer landing |
| Back support feel | Relaxed; best with a lumbar pillow for long upright sitting | Most naturally upright-friendly | Stable, “contained” feel | Softer; more sink-in over long sits |
| Fabric approach | High-performance fabrics; multiple categories; COM possible | Same | Same | Same |
| Cushion fill options | Premium Foam, Down Feather, Trillium | Same | Same | Same |
| Cushion construction (brand-level) | High-density foam core with selected surrounding fill | Same | Same | Same |
| Durability signal in testing | Strong recovery after long sessions | Consistent shape retention | Consistent; least “slouchy” | Most dependent on fluffing/rotation |
| Cleaning experience | Best when paired with wipe-friendly performance weaves | Easy day-to-day upkeep | Easy day-to-day upkeep | Can look rumpled if ignored |
| Best fit headline | Deep-lounge households | Mixed posture households | Reading and nestling | Plush traditional comfort |
How We Tested
We put each sofa through the same routine we use in our how we test sofas process—laptop hours, long TV sessions, short naps, and casual hosting—and tracked how the feel changed as the cushions settled.
Scoring covered assembly and setup, cooling and breathability, and comfort and ergonomics (seat comfort, back support, and seat depth fit). We also rated sofa durability, size and layout practicality, fabric and cleaning, and value and warranty based on what you get for the price.
Clad Home: Our Testing Experience
Melrose
Our Testing Experience
Melrose immediately read as a lounge-first sofa. On our first late-night TV run, the deeper seat let us slide back, stretch out, and stay there without constant readjusting. Marcus Reed used it for longer gaming sessions because he could change positions without feeling perched on the edge. Mia Chen kept inching forward to find a “feet on the floor” perch, which is the trade-off with deeper builds: some people love the sprawl, others feel lost in it. After two weeks of daily use, the cushions still bounced back well—but for upright work, we consistently reached for a lumbar pillow.
What we liked:
-
Deep seat that makes it easy to fully stretch out
-
Cushions recovered well after long, uninterrupted sits
-
Easy to shift from sitting to napping without changing the setup
Who it is best for:
-
Taller loungers (or anyone who naturally sprawls)
-
Movie-night households that treat the sofa like a second bed
-
People who prefer an enveloping, lounge-forward feel
Where it falls short:
-
Petite sitters may feel swallowed by the depth
-
Upright laptop work takes deliberate pillow support
-
Not the best match if you want a crisp, formal perch
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent lounging depth | Can feel too deep for shorter legs |
| Holds up well over repeated long sits | Upright lumbar support depends on pillow setup |
| Easy to shift positions without feeling stuck | Can encourage slouching if you work on it daily |
| Great for napping | Value depends heavily on your configuration |
Details
-
Price: $3,440–$11,220 (varies by layout)
-
Style notes: deeper-than-average seat; double-stitched seams
-
Layout options: Sofa; Left Chaise; Right Chaise; Reversible Chaise; Longback Left/Right; L Left/Right Return; Double Chaise; U Left/Right Chaise; U Sectional
-
Overall dimensions: varies by layout and custom build
-
Seat depth: customizable via sofa builder (depth can be dialed in)
-
Cushion firmness: perceived medium-plush in our configuration
-
Cushion style: customizable seat/back cushion style selection
-
Cushion fill options: Premium Foam; Down Feather; Trillium
-
Cushion core construction: high-density foam core with selected surrounding fill
-
Frame: solid hardwood frame (brand-level)
-
Fabric type: high-performance upholstery across multiple categories; COM possible
-
Cooling / breathability: fabric-dependent; better airflow in textured weaves than dense velvets (in use)
-
Ease of cleaning: designed around durability and stain resistance; wipe-down-friendly options available
-
Pet-friendliness: fabric-dependent; tighter weaves resisted snagging better in our use
-
Durability notes: upholstery dimensions can vary by about 1"–2" in padded areas; plan tolerance in fit expectations
-
Delivery / setup: free white glove delivery in the lower 48 states (remote exceptions apply)
-
Order flow: a dimensioned production sketch is provided for approval after ordering
-
Returns: final sale for custom-built orders
-
Warranty: 5-year coverage for manufacturing defects
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.5 | Smooth setup experience once placed in the room |
| Seat Comfort | 4.6 | Best-in-group for full-body lounging comfort |
| Back Support | 4.1 | Comfortable, but needs intentional pillow positioning for long upright sits |
| Seat Depth Fit | 3.8 | Excellent for tall loungers; less natural for petite sitters |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.2 | Fabric choice matters; performance options helped in long sessions |
| Durability | 4.5 | Cushion recovery stayed strong across repeated long sits |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.1 | Easy to sprawl and shift; depth can make exits slower |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | High-performance fabric behavior was forgiving in daily use |
| Value | 4.0 | Strong if you prioritize custom comfort; price climbs with layout |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Deep-lounge standout with a depth-fit caveat |
Westlake
Our Testing Experience
Westlake was the one we reached for when we needed a sofa to behave more like a chair—not a bed. I used it for laptop work because it kept my hips and back in a more neutral position, then still felt comfortable when I shifted into a relaxed recline later. The English roll arms gave a stable place to lean, and the gentle camelback dip subtly encouraged a more open posture without feeling stiff. Jenna Brooks liked it for hosting because two people could sit side-by-side without collapsing into a shared slump.
What we liked:
-
Supportive for upright sitting, still comfortable for lounging
-
Roll arms are genuinely comfortable for side-leaning
-
The most natural “do-everything” feel day to day
Who it is best for:
-
Homes that use one sofa for work, TV, and guests
-
Anyone who wants classic styling without a stiff sit
-
People who notice slouching on deep, soft sofas
Where it falls short:
-
Not a “sink-in” cloud if that’s your priority
-
Roll arms can steal a bit of usable seat width
-
Not the top pick if you want maximum sprawl depth
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Most balanced posture-and-lounge mix | Less cloud-like than plush models |
| Strong back support for upright sitting | Not as deep as a dedicated lounge silhouette |
| Easy to get up and down without climbing out | Roll arms can feel bulky in tight layouts |
| Great everyday comfort across tasks | Value depends on how much customization you use |
Details
-
Price: $3,440–$11,220 (varies by layout)
-
Style notes: English roll arm sofa; camelback dip
-
Layout options: Sofa; Left Chaise; Right Chaise; Reversible Chaise; Longback Left/Right; L Left/Right Return; Double Chaise; U Left/Right Chaise; U Sectional
-
Overall dimensions: varies by layout and custom build
-
Seat depth: customizable via sofa builder
-
Cushion firmness: perceived medium, supportive in our configuration
-
Cushion style: customizable cushion style selection
-
Cushion fill options: Premium Foam; Down Feather; Trillium
-
Cushion core construction: high-density foam core with selected surrounding fill
-
Frame: solid hardwood frame (brand-level)
-
Fabric type: 200+ high-performance fabrics; can provide your own material
-
Fabric safety positioning: many fabrics carry GREENGUARD or OEKO-TEX certifications; furniture not treated with flame retardants
-
Cooling / breathability: fabric-dependent; performed best with textured weaves in long sits
-
Ease of cleaning: wipe-down-friendly performance options available
-
Delivery / setup: free white glove delivery in the lower 48 states (remote exceptions apply)
-
Order flow: a dimensioned production sketch is provided for approval after ordering
-
Returns: final sale for custom-built orders
-
Warranty: 5-year coverage for manufacturing defects
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.5 | Straightforward delivery-to-room setup |
| Seat Comfort | 4.3 | Comfortable for long sits without feeling too soft |
| Back Support | 4.4 | Best posture “default” in our rotation |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.4 | Most universally comfortable depth feel across testers |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.1 | Solid performance; fabric selection drives outcomes |
| Durability | 4.5 | Consistent shape retention over repeated use |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.2 | Easy to adjust posture without sliding forward |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | High-performance fabrics stayed forgiving in daily life |
| Value | 4.1 | Strong all-around performer if you use one sofa for everything |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Most even, everyday-friendly silhouette |
Aleta
Our Testing Experience
Aleta felt “contained” the moment we sat down. The tall arms subtly narrow the lounging zone in a way that makes reading and scrolling feel cozy, not exposed. Mia liked leaning into an arm corner because it gave her a stable brace point, and Jenna noted it stayed comfortable even when someone else shifted nearby. I ended up using it for laptop work more than expected because the posture felt guided and less slump-prone. The main downside was spatial: those arms can read substantial in smaller rooms.
What we liked:
-
Tall arms create a sheltered, cozy seating zone
-
Steady feel when you shift positions
-
Great for reading and corner lounging
Who it is best for:
-
People who like “nesting” in a defined seat space
-
Readers and phone-scrollers who lean into arms
-
Households that prefer a more structured, guided sit
Where it falls short:
-
Arms can feel bulky when floor space is tight
-
Less ideal for sprawling across the full width
-
Deep-lounge fans may want more sink-in depth
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Cozy, shelter-arm feel | Arms can look and feel bulky in small rooms |
| Stable posture support | Not the widest-feeling lounge zone |
| Good for reading and corner lounging | Not the deepest sprawl profile |
| Predictable comfort over long sessions | Value depends on how much customization you need |
Details
-
Price: $3,200–$10,580 (varies by layout)
-
Style notes: blocky cushions; tall arms
-
Layout options: Sofa; Left Chaise; Right Chaise; Reversible Chaise; Longback Left/Right; L Left/Right Return; Double Chaise; U Left/Right Chaise; U Sectional
-
Overall dimensions: varies by layout and custom build
-
Seat depth: customizable via sofa builder
-
Cushion firmness: perceived medium with a steady “support first” feel
-
Cushion style: customizable cushion style selection
-
Cushion fill options: Premium Foam; Down Feather; Trillium
-
Cushion core construction: high-density foam core with selected surrounding fill
-
Frame: solid hardwood frame (brand-level)
-
Fabric type: high-performance fabrics across multiple categories; COM supported
-
Fabric safety positioning: many fabrics GREENGUARD / OEKO-TEX certified; no flame-retardant chemical treatment
-
Cooling / breathability: fabric-dependent; stayed comfortable in long sits with performance choices
-
Ease of cleaning: built around stain resistance; wipe-down-friendly options available
-
Delivery / setup: free white glove delivery in the lower 48 states (remote exceptions apply)
-
Order flow: a dimensioned production sketch is provided for approval after ordering
-
Returns: final sale for custom-built orders
-
Warranty: 5-year coverage for manufacturing defects
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.4 | Easy placement and setup in-room |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Comfortable, structured cushioning |
| Back Support | 4.3 | Stable posture feel across long sessions |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.1 | Works well for most; less “sprawl” than deep-lounge profiles |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.2 | Performance fabrics helped keep heat manageable |
| Durability | 4.4 | Held shape well across daily posture changes |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.3 | Easy to adjust without sliding forward |
| Cleaning | 4.4 | High-performance fabric behavior stayed forgiving |
| Value | 4.2 | Strong if you want a cozy, guided seat personality |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Best “sheltered comfort” option of the four |
Bedford
Our Testing Experience
Bedford was the sofa that made everyone exhale on contact. The overstuffed cushions create an immediate plush landing, and it felt inviting the moment guests walked in. It was excellent for low-stakes lounging and casual conversation, but during longer upright sitting I had to “re-find” my posture more often than on Westlake. Jenna and Ethan Cole both flagged that it’s easy to sink a bit—great for movies, less great if you’re trying to stay upright. Detail options matter here because the overall vibe shifts from tailored to relaxed depending on how you build it.
What we liked:
-
Instantly cozy, plush first impression
-
Great for relaxed hosting and soft landings
-
Styling can feel more tailored or more relaxed depending on options
Who it is best for:
-
People who want a softer, more cushioned sit
-
Traditional-leaning rooms that still want custom flexibility
-
Households that prioritize comfort over strict posture cues
Where it falls short:
-
Needs more upkeep to keep cushions looking neat
-
Less upright-ready for long laptop sessions
-
Value can drop as you move into larger layouts
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Plush, inviting comfort | Needs fluffing and rotation to stay crisp |
| Flexible styling options | Not the best for strict upright posture |
| Excellent for relaxed hosting | Can feel sink-in for some bodies |
| Cozy for long TV nights | Price climbs quickly with larger layouts |
Details
-
Price: $4,220–$13,710 (varies by layout)
-
Style notes: overstuffed knife-edge cushions; flange detail
-
Option notes: can be ordered with or without flange edges and with or without skirt
-
Layout options: Sofa; Left Chaise; Right Chaise; Reversible Chaise; Longback Left/Right; L Left/Right Return; Double Chaise; U Left/Right Chaise; U Sectional
-
Overall dimensions: varies by layout and custom build
-
Seat depth: customizable via sofa builder
-
Cushion firmness: perceived plush-medium in our configuration
-
Cushion style: customizable cushion style selection
-
Cushion fill options: Premium Foam; Down Feather; Trillium
-
Cushion core construction: high-density foam core with selected surrounding fill
-
Frame: solid hardwood frame (brand-level)
-
Fabric type: high-performance upholstery; COM supported
-
Durability tolerance: padded dimension variance of about 1"–2" can occur
-
Delivery / setup: free white glove delivery in the lower 48 states (remote exceptions apply)
-
Order flow: production sketch provided for approval; changes not allowed after approval
-
Returns: final sale for custom-built orders
-
Warranty: 5-year coverage for manufacturing defects
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.4 | Smooth placement and room setup |
| Seat Comfort | 4.5 | Plush landing that feels instantly cozy |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Comfortable, but less posture-guiding over long sits |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | Works well for many bodies; can encourage sink-in lounging |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0 | Fabric choice drives heat feel; plushness adds warmth in long sessions |
| Durability | 4.3 | Strong overall, but appearance depends on cushion care habits |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.9 | Softer landing makes quick posture resets a bit slower |
| Cleaning | 4.1 | High-performance fabrics help, but a rumpled look shows if ignored |
| Value | 3.8 | Comfort is high, but price escalation can outpace the gains |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Plush comfort winner with more upkeep demands |
Performance Score Comparison
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Melrose | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.1 |
| Westlake | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Aleta | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Bedford | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.9 |
The scores line up with what we felt in daily use. Westlake and Aleta were the easiest to live with because they balance upright sitting and relaxed lounging with fewer trade-offs. Melrose is the specialist: it leads for deep, stretch-out comfort, but the depth won’t suit everyone. Bedford is the plushest at first sit, but it gives up some posture support and feels slower to reset when you’re trying to sit upright.
How to Choose a Clad Home Sofa
Start with posture. If you sprawl, nap, or regularly curl up, prioritize seat depth and a fill that keeps you supported. If you spend real time on a laptop, prioritize back support and a silhouette that doesn’t let your hips slide forward.
Next, match the layout to your room—chaise direction, doorway clearances, and whether you actually need a U-shape for groups. In our testing, Westlake and Aleta were safer for petite sitters, Melrose suited taller loungers, and Bedford made sense when you want the softest landing and don’t mind routine cushion care.
What to Know Before You Buy
Because these are custom builds, comfort depends heavily on your choices. Depth, fill, and fabric can make the same silhouette feel very different day to day.
Deep seats can be tough for shorter legs and anyone who wants strong lumbar support. Softer builds can look more lived-in unless you rotate and fluff. And since orders are custom, you’ll want accurate measurements and timely sketch approval—this is effectively a final-sale purchase.
Clad Home vs. Alternatives
Why consider Clad Home
-
Custom sizing, layouts, and fabric choices help the sofa fit real room constraints
-
Performance-fabric options are aimed at everyday messes and daily wear
-
Fill choices help you dial in the balance between sink-in and support
Alternatives to consider
-
Room & Board Metro: supportive, straightforward, and far fewer decisions
-
Crate & Barrel Lounge: deep, cushy comfort with a simpler shopping flow
-
Interior Define Sloan: customization with a more streamlined ordering experience
Pro Tips for Clad Home
-
Pick your primary posture (upright work, TV recline, full sprawl) before you choose depth.
-
If you run warm, lean toward textured performance weaves over dense, heat-holding fabrics.
-
Choose fill with upkeep in mind: plush fills look best with regular fluffing and rotation.
-
Measure pinch points—doorways, tight hallway turns, stair landings—before committing to large returns or U layouts.
-
Treat the production sketch as your final fit check, not a formality.
-
With velvet, expect temporary crush marks from packaging pressure and give the pile time to rebound.
-
Set a simple weekly routine: quick vacuum, wipe armrests, and rotate cushions.
-
If you’re sharing the sofa, test side-leaning and frequent get-ups—some plush seats are slower to reset.
-
For deeper builds, keep a lumbar pillow nearby so upright sitting doesn’t turn into a slow slide-forward slump.
FAQs
Which Clad Home sofa felt best for long movie nights?
Melrose was easiest for long movie nights—it’s deep enough to stretch out and shift positions without feeling perched on the edge.
Which option is best if I work on a laptop on the sofa?
Westlake stayed the most upright-friendly for laptop work, with back support that held up over long sessions.
I’m petite—what should I avoid?
Avoid very deep-seat builds. Westlake’s balanced feel (or Aleta’s more contained seating zone) tended to work better for shorter legs.
Which one looks “most lived-in” the fastest?
Bedford shows the “lived-in” look the fastest. Its plush cushions are comfortable, but they can look relaxed sooner if you don’t rotate and fluff them.