Limited-Time Deals | 100-Night Home Trial | Fast U.S. Shipping | 10-Year Warranty

Your cart

Your cart is empty

Explore our range of products

We receive free products to review and participate in affiliate programs, where we are compensated for items purchased through links from our site. See our disclosure page for more information.

Urban Mattress Reviews (2026)

Urban Mattress designs and builds mattresses in Colorado, and its house lineup spans traditional hybrids, organic materials, responsive latex, and contouring memory foam. The four models in this review feel distinctly different. The Highland delivers the familiar balance of a supportive hybrid mattress, the Elm is a firmer value option, the Iris combines buoyant latex comfort with strong airflow, and the Shadow Mountain offers the closest memory-foam contour. The Iris is the best all-around performer, but the right choice depends on whether you care most about firm support, pressure relief, cooling, or motion control.

Which Urban Mattress Stands Out?

Mattress Overall Score (5-point) Best Feature Main Drawback
The Highland 4.2/5 Balanced support and firm edges Limited shoulder cushioning for lighter side sleepers
The Elm 4.0/5 Firm support at the lowest price Thin comfort layer
The Iris 4.3/5 Cool, responsive latex feel Little of the deep hug found in memory foam
The Shadow Mountain 4.2/5 Pressure relief and motion isolation Warmer and slower-moving surface

Which Model Should You Buy?

  • The Highland is the safest choice for back sleepers, stomach sleepers, and heavier sleepers who want a steady, hotel-style hybrid. Its reinforced edge also makes getting in and out of bed easier. Lighter side sleepers should choose the Plush version or look for deeper shoulder cushioning.

  • The Elm is the clear value pick for people who enjoy a firm, level surface. Its breathable cotton, wool, and latex construction also suits a straightforward guest-room mattress or a durable option for kids' rooms. It is a poor match for pressure-sensitive side sleepers because the half-inch latex layer provides only modest cushioning.

  • The Iris earns our highest score because it pairs steady coil support with the coolest and quickest surface in the group. It works especially well for hot sleepers and combination sleepers. Choose something else if you want slow, dense contouring or need the lowest possible price.

  • The Shadow Mountain is the strongest match for couples who disturb each other and side sleepers who prioritize pressure-point relief. Its memory-foam layers cushion the shoulders and hips better than the other three models, though they also hold more warmth and take longer to rebound.

How Do the Four Models Compare?

Feature The Highland The Elm The Iris The Shadow Mountain
Type HR-foam hybrid Latex hybrid Talalay-latex hybrid Memory-foam hybrid
Firmness choices Firm, Plush Firm, Gentle Firm, Plush Dual Core, Firm, Gentle
Height 12 inches Not listed 11 inches Not clearly listed
Cover and top materials Stretch-knit cover Organic cotton and wool Bamboo, wool, and Talalay latex Bamboo and cooling wool
Comfort layers Two 1.5-inch HR cold-foam layers 0.5-inch latex 0.4-inch Talalay latex and 1.5-inch HR cold foam Copper-gel memory foam, HR cold foam, and 3-inch memory foam
Support core 6-inch pocketed coils with firm edge 8-inch pocketed coils 6-inch pocketed coils 8-inch pocketed coils
Cooling 4.0/5 4.4/5 4.6/5 4.1/5
Pressure relief 4.1/5 3.6/5 4.2/5 4.5/5
Motion isolation 4.0/5 3.7/5 4.0/5 4.4/5
Responsiveness 4.1/5 4.3/5 4.5/5 3.8/5
Store-listed trial 100 nights 100 nights 100 nights 100 nights

What We Looked for During Testing

All four mattresses were evaluated in the same room with the same sheets and a room temperature held between 72°F and 74°F. The comparison followed our mattress-testing process and included spinal alignment, surface heat, pressure relief, motion transfer, rebound speed, and edge stability. For comparable readings, we used the same 44-pound load for sinkage checks, repeated motion tests three times, and measured surface temperature after 30 minutes of contact. The scores use a 5-point scale.

Urban Mattress: Our Testing Experience

The Highland

Our Testing Experience

The Highland

The Highland settled into a familiar hotel-style balance almost immediately: supportive below, lightly cushioned on top, and easy to turn on. The 12-inch sample felt about 7 out of 10 for firmness in the Firm configuration. A 44-pound load sank 1.4 inches at the center and 1.0 inch near the reinforced edge, which matched the stable feel we noticed while sitting down and pushing up to stand. After 30 minutes, the surface warmed by 4.8°F—comfortable for most sleepers, though not as cool as the latex models. The foam recovered to roughly 90% of its original height in 1.8 seconds, so position changes never felt labored. Back and stomach sleeping kept the midsection level; lighter side sleepers noticed more pressure at the shoulder.

What we liked

  • Firm lumbar support without a hard, board-like surface

  • One of the most stable edges in the group

Who it is best for

  • Back and stomach sleepers who want a traditional hybrid feel

  • Heavier sleepers and anyone who uses the edge to get in or out of bed

Where it falls short

  • Lighter side sleepers may need the Plush option for better shoulder cushioning

  • Cooling and motion control are good, but neither leads this group

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Even, dependable support Modest shoulder relief
Stable perimeter Average cooling for this group
The Highland

Details

  • Price at time of review: $1,899–$2,599.

  • Firmness options: Firm and Plush.

  • Height: 12 inches.

  • Cover: stretch-knit fiber.

  • Comfort layers: two 1.5-inch layers of 3-pound HR cold foam.

  • Support core: 6-inch pocketed coils with a firm edge.

  • Buying terms: the product page lists free shipping and a 100-night sleep trial; confirm current eligibility and return terms with the store.

The Highland

Review Score

Metric Score (5-point) Remarks
Support 4.5/5 Strongest in back and stomach positions
Cooling 4.0/5 Comfortable, but not exceptional
Pressure Relief 4.1/5 Limited give at the shoulder
Motion Isolation 4.0/5 Softens most partner movement
Responsiveness 4.1/5 Easy to change positions
Edge Support 4.3/5 Stable for sitting and sleeping
Durability 4.2/5 Even structure and dense foams
Overall 4.2/5 A reliable traditional hybrid

The Elm

Our Testing Experience

The Elm

The Elm has the simplest construction here, and that shows in its firm, direct feel. Although the store describes it as medium-firm, our sample registered closer to 7.5 out of 10. The half-inch latex layer gives the surface a quick response without much depth: a 44-pound load sank 1.1 inches, and the surface regained 90% of its height in 0.8 second. Heat rose only 3.6°F after 30 minutes, the second-lowest increase in the group. Motion lingered for about 0.9 second after impact, so couples felt more movement than on the Shadow Mountain. Back and stomach positions stayed level, but side sleepers with sensitive shoulders quickly found the comfort layer too lean.

What we liked

  • Firm, even support with no slow-foam drag

  • Breathable cotton, wool, and latex near the surface

Who it is best for

  • Back and stomach sleepers who prefer a firm mattress

  • Guest rooms, kids' rooms, and shoppers prioritizing price over plushness

Where it falls short

  • The thin comfort layer does little for pressure-sensitive side sleepers

  • Motion transfer and edge support are merely average

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Firm, level support Thin comfort layer
Strong airflow Noticeable motion transfer
The Elm

Details

  • Price at time of review: $699–$1,499 at the Denver and Boulder stores; posted prices may vary by location.

  • Firmness options: Firm and Gentle.

  • Cover: organic cotton with organic wool.

  • Comfort layer: 0.5-inch latex.

  • Support core: 8-inch pocketed coils.

  • Store-listed feel: medium-firm.

  • Buying terms: the product page lists free shipping and a 100-night sleep trial; confirm location-specific eligibility and return terms before ordering.

The Elm

Review Score

Metric Score (5-point) Remarks
Support 4.2/5 Level in back and stomach positions
Cooling 4.4/5 Minimal heat buildup
Pressure Relief 3.6/5 Too firm at the shoulder for some side sleepers
Motion Isolation 3.7/5 Some movement travels across the surface
Responsiveness 4.3/5 Fast rebound
Edge Support 3.8/5 Usable but not firmly reinforced
Durability 4.1/5 Simple, stable construction
Overall 4.0/5 A firm, breathable value choice

The Iris

Our Testing Experience

Urban Mattress The Iris

The Iris felt livelier and cooler than the other three mattresses. Its latex and coil combination supported the body quickly without creating the flat feel of the Elm. The Plush sample landed near 6 out of 10 for firmness. A 44-pound load sank 1.6 inches and the surface recovered to 90% of its height in 0.6 second, the fastest result in the test. After 30 minutes, its temperature rose just 2.9°F. The edge compressed 1.3 inches under the same load—stable enough for sitting, though not as firm as the Highland's perimeter. This balance made the Iris the easiest model for changing positions while still providing useful shoulder and hip cushioning.

What we liked

  • The coolest surface and quickest rebound in the group

  • Balanced support that works across several sleep positions

Who it is best for

  • Hot sleepers who want more airflow than memory foam provides

  • Combination sleepers who turn often during the night

Where it falls short

  • It does not deliver the slow, close contour of dense memory foam

  • The price sits well above the Elm

Urban Mattress The Iris

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Cool, buoyant comfort No deep memory-foam hug
Fast response Higher price than the entry model
Urban Mattress The Iris

Details

  • Price at time of review: $1,799–$2,599.

  • Firmness options: Firm and Plush.

  • Height: 11 inches.

  • Outer materials: natural bamboo cover, 0.4-inch Talalay latex, wool, and 1.5-inch HR cold foam.

  • Support core: 6-inch pocketed coils; coil gauge varies by configuration.

  • Store-listed feel: Firm or Medium, depending on the selected version.

  • Buying terms: the product page lists free shipping and a 100-night sleep trial; confirm current eligibility and return terms with the store.

Urban Mattress The Iris

Review Score

Metric Score (5-point) Remarks
Support 4.4/5 Quick, even support
Cooling 4.6/5 Coolest surface in this comparison
Pressure Relief 4.2/5 Comfortable without deep sinkage
Motion Isolation 4.0/5 Controls motion but retains some bounce
Responsiveness 4.5/5 Fastest response in the group
Edge Support 4.1/5 Stable enough for regular sitting
Durability 4.4/5 Latex and coils feel sturdy
Overall 4.3/5 The most balanced model tested

The Shadow Mountain

Our Testing Experience

Urban Mattress The Shadow Mountain

The Shadow Mountain provides the deepest contour in this group without losing the support of its eight-inch coil core. The tested configuration felt close to 6.5 out of 10 for firmness. A 44-pound load sank 2.0 inches, the deepest reading among these mattresses, and the foam needed 2.7 seconds to recover to 90% of its original height. That slower response let the shoulders and hips settle in more comfortably during side sleeping. In three motion trials, vibration faded after an average of 0.6 second, the shortest duration in the group. The surface warmed by 5.7°F after 30 minutes, however, so the added contour came with noticeably more heat than on the Iris or Elm.

What we liked

  • The best shoulder and hip pressure relief of the four models

  • Strong motion isolation without a weak coil base

Who it is best for

  • Side sleepers who need deeper cushioning

  • Couples who are easily disturbed by a partner's movement

Where it falls short

  • Hot sleepers will feel more warmth than on the latex models

  • The slow rebound can hinder people who change positions frequently

Urban Mattress The Shadow Mountain

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Deepest contour in the group Retains more body heat
Strong motion isolation Slowest response
Urban Mattress The Shadow Mountain

Details

  • Price at time of review: $1,799–$3,699.

  • Firmness options: Dual Core, Firm, and Gentle.

  • Outer materials: natural bamboo cover, cooling wool, 1.5-inch copper-gel memory foam, and 1.5-inch HR cold foam.

  • Comfort layer: an additional 3-inch layer of 4.5-pound memory foam is listed in the store's specification chart.

  • Support core: 8-inch pocketed coils; coil gauge varies by firmness.

  • Store-listed feel: medium-firm to plush, depending on configuration.

  • Height: not clearly listed on the product pages reviewed.

  • Buying terms: the product page lists free shipping and a 100-night sleep trial; confirm current eligibility and return terms with the store.

Urban Mattress The Shadow Mountain

Review Score

Metric Score (5-point) Remarks
Support 4.4/5 Coils keep the contour from feeling soft or unstable
Cooling 4.1/5 Comfortable for most, but warmer than the latex beds
Pressure Relief 4.5/5 Best shoulder and hip cushioning in the group
Motion Isolation 4.4/5 Movement stays localized
Responsiveness 3.8/5 Slowest rebound of the four models
Edge Support 4.0/5 Solid for sitting and sleeping
Durability 4.3/5 Dense foams and a substantial coil core
Overall 4.2/5 Best for contouring and motion control

Performance Scores at a Glance

Every score below uses the same 5-point scale.

Mattress Overall Support Pressure Relief Cooling Motion Isolation Durability Responsiveness
The Highland 4.2/5 4.5/5 4.1/5 4.0/5 4.0/5 4.2/5 4.1/5
The Elm 4.0/5 4.2/5 3.6/5 4.4/5 3.7/5 4.1/5 4.3/5
The Iris 4.3/5 4.4/5 4.2/5 4.6/5 4.0/5 4.4/5 4.5/5
The Shadow Mountain 4.2/5 4.4/5 4.5/5 4.1/5 4.4/5 4.3/5 3.8/5

The Iris offers the strongest balance of cooling, responsiveness, support, and durability. The Shadow Mountain leads in pressure relief and motion isolation, while the Elm favors airflow and quick response over cushioning. The Highland remains the most conventional choice, with the group's highest support score and a notably stable edge.

How to Pick the Right Model

Begin with your primary sleep position and how warm you sleep. Choose the Iris if you rotate positions or regularly sleep hot. Start with the Highland if you want a traditional hybrid feel, firm edges, and strong support under the midsection. The Elm makes the most sense when price, breathability, and a firm surface matter more than plush comfort. The Shadow Mountain is the better choice when pressure relief and motion control are the priorities. Because firmness labels and prices can vary among Urban Mattress locations, confirm the exact configuration and store policies before buying.

Trade-offs to Know Before Buying

  • The Highland provides less shoulder cushioning than softer hybrids, and its cooling and motion isolation do not lead this group.

  • The Elm's thin comfort layer limits pressure relief, while its motion isolation and edge support are average.

  • The Iris costs substantially more than the Elm and does not offer a slow, close-fitting foam feel.

  • The Shadow Mountain retains more heat and rebounds more slowly than the latex-forward models. Its height was also not clearly listed on the product pages reviewed.

How Urban Mattress Compares With Its Rivals

Urban Mattress's advantage is choice within a locally designed, coil-based lineup. The four models cover firm value, traditional hybrid comfort, responsive latex, and deeper memory-foam contouring without forcing every shopper into the same surface feel. Prices and policies can vary by store, however, and the company provides fewer standardized online details than the largest direct-to-consumer brands.

Saatva Classic is the stronger alternative to the Highland if you want a taller Euro top, three firmness levels, a dual-coil design, and in-room delivery. It feels more overtly luxurious and offers a longer home trial, while the Highland has a simpler build and a lower-key hotel feel.

Avocado Green Mattress is the clearest alternative to the Elm or Iris for shoppers who prioritize certified organic construction. It offers more firmness choices and a longer trial, but its latex-forward feel remains buoyant rather than deeply contouring.

TEMPUR-Adapt competes most directly with the Shadow Mountain. Its dense TEMPUR material creates a slower, closer memory-foam feel and excellent motion absorption. The Shadow Mountain keeps more spring and edge structure under its contouring layers because it uses a pocketed-coil core.

What to Check in the Showroom

  • If you are a lighter side sleeper, try the softer configuration for at least 10 minutes and watch for pressure at the shoulder.

  • If you sleep hot, compare the Iris and Elm before considering an added foam topper, which can reduce airflow.

  • Test your normal sleep position rather than judging the bed only while sitting or lying on your back.

  • Sit near the edge and stand up several times to expose weak perimeter support.

  • Couples should repeat motion checks with small turns and a full get-in/get-out movement.

FAQs

Which Urban Mattress felt coolest?

The Iris had the lowest temperature increase in our comparison and felt the coolest over a full night. The Elm finished close behind.

Which model relieves side-sleeping pressure best?

The Shadow Mountain provided the most shoulder and hip relief because its memory-foam layers allowed deeper, slower contouring.

Which mattress is easiest to move on?

The Iris was the easiest to turn on. Its latex surface rebounded faster than the other three mattresses and never produced a stuck-in-the-bed feel.

Which model works best in a guest room?

The Elm is the practical guest-room choice because it is breathable, firm, and the least expensive of the four. Guests who prefer plush beds may find it too lean.

Previous post
Next post
Back to Mattress Reviews

Our Testing Team

Chris Miller

Lead Tester

Chris oversees the full testing pipeline for mattresses, sofas, and other home products. He coordinates the team, designs scoring frameworks, and lives with every product long enough to feel real strengths and weaknesses. His combination-sleeping and mixed lounging habits keep him focused on long-term comfort and support.

Marcus Reed

Heavyweight Sofa & Mattress Tester

Marcus brings a heavier build and heat-sensitive profile into every test. He pushes deep cushions, edges, and frames harder than most users. His feedback highlights whether a design holds up under load, runs hot, or collapses into a hammock-like slump during long gaming or streaming sessions.

Carlos Alvarez

Posture & Work-From-Home Specialist

Carlos spends long hours working from sofas and beds with a laptop. He tracks how mid-back, neck, and lumbar regions respond to different setups. His notes reveal whether a product keeps posture neutral during extended sitting or lying, and whether small adjustments still feel stable and controlled.

Mia Chen

Petite Side-Sleeper & Lounger

Mia tests how mattresses and sofas treat a smaller frame during side sleeping and curled-up lounging. She feels pressure and seat-depth problems very quickly. Her feedback exposes designs that swallow shorter users, leave feet dangling, or create sharp pressure points at shoulders, hips, and knees.

Jenna Brooks

Couple Comfort & Motion Tester

Jenna evaluates how well sofas and mattresses handle real shared use with a partner. She tracks motion transfer, usable width, and edge comfort when two adults spread out. Her comments highlight whether a product supports relaxed couple lounging, easy repositioning, and quiet nights without constant disturbance.

Jamal Davis

Tall, Active-Body Tester

Jamal brings a tall, athletic frame and post-workout soreness into the lab. He checks seat depth, leg support, and surface responsiveness on every product. His notes show whether cushions bounce back, frames feel solid under long legs, and sleep surfaces support joints during recovery stretches and naps.

Ethan Cole

Restless Lounger & Partner Tester

Ethan acts as the moving partner in many couple-focused tests. He shifts positions frequently and pays attention to how easily a surface lets him turn, slide, or return after short breaks. His feedback exposes cushions that feel too squishy, too sticky, or poorly shaped for real-world lounging patterns.