Springfit’s lineup spans spring-based builds, hybrids, and specialty designs aimed at airflow and spinal support. I tested four popular models—the ZBox Micro Grid, ProActiv Flow, ProActiv Jump, and Reactive Dual Latex—using support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability as the core yardsticks. They can feel very different night to night, so model choice matters.
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZBox Micro Grid Mattress | 4.3/5.0 | Cool, stable feel; strong lumbar steadiness | Less “hug” than plush foams | Hot sleepers; back sleepers who want stable support | - |
| ProActiv Flow Mattress | 4.2/5.0 | Balanced contour + support; calmer for partner movement | Not the bounciest | Couples; combo sleepers who want a steady hybrid feel | - |
| Reactive Dual Latex Mattress | 4.2/5.0 | Pressure relief with quick rebound; flexible comfort options | Slightly livelier motion than “dead” foams | Side sleepers who hate “stuck” foam; mixed-position sleepers | - |
| ProActiv Jump Mattress | 4.0/5.0 | Big bounce; supportive spring feel | Motion travels more | People who like a traditional springy bed; guest rooms | - |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the four, we found two clear personalities: the calmer, more “settled” hybrids (ZBox Micro Grid and ProActiv Flow) versus the livelier, more spring-forward builds (ProActiv Jump and the latex-forward Reactive Dual Latex). Marcus ran hottest and pushed hard on edge stability; he gravitated toward the Micro Grid and Flow. Mia cared most about shoulder and hip comfort; she preferred the Dual Latex, with Flow close behind.
Springfit Mattress Comparison Chart
| Feature | ZBox Micro Grid Mattress | ProActiv Flow Mattress | Reactive Dual Latex Mattress | ProActiv Jump Mattress |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested feel | Medium-firm, steady | Medium-firm, balanced | Medium to medium-firm, responsive | Medium-firm, springy |
| Thickness options | 6 in, 8 in | 6 in, 8 in, 10 in | 5 in, 6 in, 8 in | 6 in, 8 in |
| Core concept | Micro-grid + air-chamber ventilation + supportive foam | Hybrid with memory foam + pocket springs | Dual-side latex comfort with mixed foams | Bonnell spring system with felt + HR foams |
| Notable materials | Micro grid with 1200+ air chambers; Airvent-style support foam | Verti Cool FR fabric; memory foam; pocket springs | Organic latex layer; memory foam; reactive foam; dual-side design | 3D Cool Hex fabric; HR foams; carbon-manganese Bonnell springs |
| Cooling notes | Most “dry” and ventilated feel in our set | Good airflow; less heat pooling than dense foams | Naturally breezy feel with fast rebound | Airy spring feel; cover helps with moisture/heat |
| Motion isolation | Strong for a responsive surface | Best in this group | Good, but not as muted as Flow | Weakest; motion carries |
| Responsiveness | Quick, easy repositioning | Balanced, not sluggish | Fast rebound, minimal “stuck” feel | Most bouncy |
| Warranty | 5 years | 5 years | 7 years | 5 years |
How We Tested It
We rotated through each mattress in the same bedroom setup and kept the pillow and bedding constant to reduce noise in the results. I logged nightly notes on support and spinal alignment, plus how the feel changed from lights-out to early morning. Marcus focused on cooling, edge support, and whether his hips stayed lifted without “hammocking.” Mia tracked pressure relief at shoulders and outer hips, and how easy it felt to switch sides. Every score below is tied to Support, Cooling, Pressure Relief, Motion Isolation, Responsiveness, Edge Support, and Durability.
Springfit Mattress: Our Testing Experience
ZBox Micro Grid Mattress
Our Testing Experience
The first thing I noticed was how “even” the surface felt—less sink, more controlled give. On my back, my lower-back tightness didn’t flare the way it does on soft foam; the bed stayed supportive when I slid a laptop onto my thighs and sat slightly reclined. Marcus called it out on night one: the heat didn’t build in the same way he expects from thicker foams, and he liked that his hips stayed level when he drifted toward the edge. Mia didn’t get the deepest plush cradle, but she also didn’t get sharp pressure at her shoulder, which mattered more to her than a cloud-like top.
What we liked:
-
Stable, confidence-inspiring support through the midsection
-
Cooling that stayed consistent late into the night
-
Easy repositioning without feeling “stuck”
Who it is best for:
-
Hot sleepers who still want a supportive surface
-
Back sleepers and combo sleepers who prioritize alignment
Where it falls short:
-
Not the plushest option for people who want deep, slow-melting contouring
-
Edge compresses more than a reinforced coil perimeter
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong, steady support feel | Not a deeply plush “hug” |
| Noticeably cooler sleep surface | Edge feel is only average |
| Quick responsiveness for turning | May feel too firm for some light side sleepers |
Details
-
Tested feel: Medium-firm
-
Available thickness: 6 in, 8 in
-
Cover: Melange knitted fabric
-
Construction highlights: Advanced micro grid with 1200+ air chambers; Airvent-style responsive support foam
-
Cooling: Ventilated grid/air-chamber concept
-
Warranty: 5 years
-
Certifications noted: CertiPUR-US foam certification; CertiGuard germ protection
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.5 | Kept my lumbar area steady without a “dip” feeling |
| Cooling | 4.5 | Marcus stayed noticeably more comfortable on warm nights |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Not ultra-plush, but avoided sharp shoulder pressure for Mia |
| Motion Isolation | 4.2 | Movement stayed fairly localized for a responsive surface |
| Responsiveness | 4.3 | Quick rebound made side-to-back turns easy |
| Edge Support | 4.0 | Stable enough for sitting, but compresses at the perimeter |
| Durability | 4.1 | No early softening in our rotation window |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Best blend of cooling + alignment in this group |
ProActiv Flow Mattress
Our Testing Experience
Flow felt like the “easy default” of the set: balanced, not too springy, not too slow. On my side, the top layers gave me enough contour to keep my hips from feeling jammed, while the base stayed supportive when I rolled to my back. Marcus paid attention to whether his hips would sink and force his lower back to arch; he didn’t get that hammocking sensation here, and heat buildup stayed moderate. Mia’s biggest note was that her shoulder could settle without that numb, compressed feeling she gets on firmer spring beds. If I had to pick the one mattress where nobody on our small team felt out of place, this was it.
What we liked:
-
Reliable “middle lane” feel across sleep positions
-
Strong motion isolation compared to the springier builds
-
Good edge stability for morning sit-and-stand routines
Who it is best for:
-
Couples who need calmer motion transfer
-
Combo sleepers who rotate positions through the night
Where it falls short:
-
If you want a super bouncy, classic spring feel, it’s more restrained
-
Cooling is good, not exceptional like the Micro Grid
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Balanced hybrid feel | Less bounce than a traditional innerspring |
| Best motion control in this set | Cooling is solid, not standout |
| Consistent support for mixed positions | Not the plushest for dedicated side sleepers |
Details
-
Tested feel: Medium-firm
-
Available thickness: 6 in, 8 in, 10 in
-
Cover: Verti Cool FR fabric
-
Comfort materials: Aero Sleep memory foam; HR comfort foam
-
Support materials: Carbon-manganese pocket springs; HR support foam
-
Other components: Turkish Thermobond felt
-
Warranty: 5 years
-
Certifications noted: CertiPUR-US foam certification; CertiGuard germ protection
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4 | Held alignment well when I switched from side to back |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Stayed reasonably temperature-neutral across weeks |
| Pressure Relief | 4.1 | Enough contour for Mia’s shoulder comfort without feeling mushy |
| Motion Isolation | 4.3 | The calmest, least disruptive feel when someone moved |
| Responsiveness | 4.1 | Easy turns without the “trampoline” bounce |
| Edge Support | 4.2 | Felt secure sitting and sleeping closer to the edge |
| Durability | 4.1 | No obvious early settling during rotation |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Most even, well-rounded performance across metrics |
Reactive Dual Latex Mattress
Our Testing Experience
This one felt “alive” in the best way—supportive, but quick to respond. The latex layer gave it that buoyant pushback that kept my hips from feeling stuck, and when I rolled over, the surface seemed to meet me rather than swallow me. Mia appreciated the comfort flexibility: when she needed a gentler feel under her shoulder, she could dial in her setup to avoid pressure buildup; when I wanted more stability for my back, the firmer side felt more locked-in. Marcus liked that it didn’t trap heat the way dense foams can, but he did notice that motion had a bit more “carry” than Flow.
What we liked:
-
Fast, springy responsiveness that makes repositioning effortless
-
Strong pressure relief without the slow-sink foam feel
-
Comfort versatility that adapts to changing preferences
Who it is best for:
-
Side sleepers who want cushion but dislike “stuck” memory foam
-
Combo sleepers who change positions and want quick rebound
Where it falls short:
-
Not as motion-dampening as the calmest hybrid in this lineup
-
Edge feels good, but not exceptionally reinforced
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Quick, resilient latex response | Slightly more motion than Flow |
| Dual-side comfort flexibility | Edge support is good, not elite |
| Good balance of contour and lift | May feel too responsive for “deep hug” seekers |
Details
-
Tested feel: Medium to medium-firm (varies by side)
-
Dual-side design: One side firm, one side soft
-
Available thickness: 5 in, 6 in, 8 in
-
Cover: Health+ fabric
-
Comfort materials: Aero Sleep memory foam; HR comfort foam
-
Key material: 100% organic latex (GOLS certified)
-
Support materials: HR support foam; ReActive foam
-
Warranty: 7 years
-
Certifications noted: CertiPUR-US foam certification; CertiGuard germ protection
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.3 | Kept my hips lifted with a more “buoyant” kind of support |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Less heat buildup than dense foams in our rotation |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3 | Mia had the best shoulder/hip comfort on the softer side |
| Motion Isolation | 3.9 | More energy transfer than Flow, especially with quick turns |
| Responsiveness | 4.4 | The easiest mattress for turning without effort |
| Edge Support | 3.9 | Secure enough, but the perimeter gives more than Flow |
| Durability | 4.2 | Latex-forward feel stayed consistent in our use window |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Best choice if you want pressure relief with fast rebound |
ProActiv Jump Mattress
Our Testing Experience
Jump has the most traditional “spring mattress” personality here: you feel lift, bounce, and airflow right away. I noticed it most when I sat down to tie my shoes—the surface pushed back instead of letting me sink. When I slept on my back, my spine felt nicely supported, but on my side I needed more careful pillow positioning to keep my shoulder comfortable. Marcus liked the lively feel and the way his hips stayed up, but he also called out the trade-off: when I shifted position, he could feel more of that movement. For sleepers who want a classic, responsive bed, this is the one that leans hardest into that identity.
What we liked:
-
The biggest bounce and easiest “in/out of bed” feel
-
Strong support sensation through the spring core
-
Airy feel that doesn’t get swampy
Who it is best for:
-
People who like a classic innerspring feel
-
Guest rooms and sleepers who don’t mind a livelier surface
Where it falls short:
-
Motion transfer is the most noticeable in the group
-
Side sleepers with sharp pressure sensitivity may want more plushness
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very responsive and bouncy | Motion travels more |
| Supportive spring feel | Less contouring for pressure relief |
| Airy, traditional mattress personality | Not ideal for very light, sensitive side sleepers |
Details
-
Tested feel: Medium-firm, spring-forward
-
Available thickness: 6 in, 8 in
-
Cover: 3D Cool Hex fabric
-
Comfort materials: HR comfort foam; HR support foam
-
Support core: Carbon-manganese Bonnell springs
-
Other components: Turkish Thermobond felt
-
Warranty: 5 years
-
Certifications noted: CertiPUR-US foam certification; CertiGuard germ protection
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2 | Good lift for my lower back; hips stayed supported |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Airy sleep surface; stayed comfortable on warmer nights |
| Pressure Relief | 3.7 | Less contour than Flow/Dual Latex, especially for Mia’s shoulder |
| Motion Isolation | 3.2 | The most noticeable movement transfer in our set |
| Responsiveness | 4.6 | Strong rebound; easiest “turn and settle” feel |
| Edge Support | 3.8 | Fine for sitting, but not as locked-in as the best hybrid edges |
| Durability | 4.2 | Springs and felt layers felt stable over weeks |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Great if you want bounce; less ideal if you need motion control |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness | Edge Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZBox Micro Grid Mattress | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.0 |
| ProActiv Flow Mattress | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.2 |
| Reactive Dual Latex Mattress | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 3.9 |
| ProActiv Jump Mattress | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 3.8 |
The most evenly strong performer is ProActiv Flow, with no major weak spot and the best motion isolation. ZBox Micro Grid earns the top overall score by pairing the strongest cooling with excellent support. Reactive Dual Latex is the pressure-relief and responsiveness standout, but it gives up a bit of motion control. ProActiv Jump is the bounce king, and it pays for that with the lowest motion isolation score.
How to choose a Springfit mattress
Start with your top constraint: hot sleeping favors ZBox Micro Grid, while couple-friendly calm points to ProActiv Flow. If you want quick rebound without a trapped-in-foam feeling, Reactive Dual Latex is the most responsive, with a comfort-flexibility advantage. If you like a classic spring bed and don’t share the bed (or don’t mind movement), ProActiv Jump is the most traditional. For lightweight side sleepers, I’d steer first to Reactive Dual Latex or ProActiv Flow.
Limitations
These four models show the brand’s main trade-offs: the most responsive beds also carry more motion, and the most stable beds can feel less plush. ProActiv Jump is the least suitable for light, pressure-sensitive side sleepers and for couples who wake easily. Reactive Dual Latex is less ideal for people who want a very dead, movement-absorbing surface. ZBox Micro Grid can feel too firm for those who need deep cradle. ProActiv Flow is the safest all-around choice, but not the springiest.
Springfit Mattress vs. alternatives
Why choose these models
- Broad range of sleep “personalities,” from classic spring bounce to calmer hybrids
- Clear emphasis on airflow-oriented materials and support-forward builds
- A reversible comfort option for sleepers whose preferences change
Alternatives to consider
- Saatva Classic: a premium innerspring with strong traditional lift and delivery service perks
- Helix Midnight: a mainstream hybrid that targets side-sleeper pressure relief and balanced support
- Avocado Green Mattress: an organic-focused latex hybrid for shoppers prioritizing certified materials
Pro Tips for Springfit Mattress
-
Give any new mattress a short adjustment window before making a final call; your body recalibrates.
-
If you run hot, use breathable sheets and a low-profile protector so airflow features can actually work.
-
If motion transfer bothers you, avoid the bounciest spring build and prioritize hybrids with calmer movement.
-
For side sleeping, tune your pillow height first; many “pressure” complaints start at the neck.
-
If you sit on the edge daily, choose the model with the best edge score and use a stable foundation.
-
Rotate the mattress periodically to even out wear patterns in the comfort layers.
-
If you flip between back and side, favor the most balanced feel rather than extreme plush or extreme firm.
-
On a dual-side mattress, keep notes for a week on each side so the choice is based on patterns, not one night.
FAQs
Q: Which one felt coolest in your room?
A: ZBox Micro Grid stayed the most consistently cool, especially for Marcus.
Q: Which is best for couples?
A: ProActiv Flow had the calmest motion behavior when one person moved.
Q: Which helped the most with shoulder pressure?
A: Reactive Dual Latex was Mia’s most comfortable for side-sleep pressure points.
Q: Which feels most like a traditional spring mattress?
A: ProActiv Jump has the biggest bounce and the most classic spring feel.
