Slumber Solutions’ current lineup is a tight, four-model mix: a compact dual-sided foam bed for small spaces, two all-foam options with distinct “feel” profiles, and a foam-and-coil hybrid aimed at sleepers who want more lift and edge stability. Across weeks of at-home use, we focused on support, pressure relief, cooling, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability to clarify who each model fits—and who should skip it.
Product overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The University | 3.5 | Flippable feel options, easy to move, compact | Limited thickness, modest edge stability | Dorms, guest rooms, smaller frames | $166.40–$204.00 |
| Select | 4.0 | Supportive “on top” feel, balanced foam response | Less deep hug for sharp shoulder pressure | Back sleepers, combo sleepers, lighter couples | $303.20–$719.20 |
| Hybrid | 4.1 | Stronger edges, easier turning, steadier lift | Slightly more motion than all-foam | Hot sleepers, heavier bodies, people who move a lot | $303.20–$719.20 |
| Ebony | 3.9 | Deep contouring, excellent motion damping | Slower to pivot, warmer “foam hug” moments | Side sleepers, pressure-sensitive joints, quieter partner sleep | $343.20–$719.20 |
Testing team takeaways
After rotating these beds through real nights, the Hybrid felt the most stable for bigger bodies and frequent position changes, while Ebony delivered the most noticeable pressure relief. Select landed in the middle with a buoyant, less “stuck” foam feel, and The University worked best where space and budget matter more than edge structure. Marcus called out heat buildup quickly; Mia zeroed in on shoulder and hip pressure; Carlos stayed focused on neutral alignment through long, flat back-sleep stretches.
Slumber Solutions Mattress comparison chart
| Feature | The University | Select | Hybrid | Ebony |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | All-foam | All-foam | Foam + pocket coils | All-foam |
| Materials (verified) | Dual-sided memory foam | NRGel memory foam + foam base | NRGel/gel memory foam + 6" pocket coils + perimeter support | Activated-carbon memory foam + foam base |
| Available sizes | TwinXL, Twin, Full | TwinXL, Twin, Full, Queen, King, California King | Twin, Full, Queen, King | TwinXL, Twin, Full, Queen, King |
| Thickness options | 7" | 10", 12", 14" | 10" | 12", 14" |
| Price range | $166.40–$204.00 | $303.20–$719.20 | $303.20–$719.20 | $343.20–$719.20 |
| Shipping | Free standard shipping | Free standard shipping | Free standard shipping | Free standard shipping |
| Trial period | - | 100 nights | - | 100 nights |
| Warranty | 10-year limited | 10-year limited | 10-year limited | 10-year limited |
| Tested feel (our notes) | Firm-to-plush (flip) | Medium to medium-firm, “on top” | Medium-firm with lift | Medium, deeper hug |
| Cooling (our notes) | Average | Above-average for foam | Best of the four | Above-average for foam, still a hug |
How we tested these mattresses
We rotated each mattress through full-night sleep, pre-bed reading, and morning sit-and-stand routines, then compared notes after several weeks. Support was judged by lumbar and hip alignment; cooling by heat buildup over the first hour and after midnight. Pressure relief was based on shoulder/outer-hip comfort for side sleeping; motion isolation by partner-disturbance style drop-and-turn checks. Responsiveness and edge support came from turning effort and perimeter sitting, while durability was a practical read on materials and how the feel held steady over time.
Slumber Solutions Mattress: our testing experience
The University
Our testing experience
I treated The University like a real-life “small-room mattress”: a few nights in a guest-room frame, then a flip to compare the two sides. The first thing I noticed was how quickly it settled into a predictable, no-drama feel—useful when you don’t want to overthink a secondary bed. Carlos stayed mostly on his back and said the surface kept him level as long as he didn’t let his hips sink too far. Mia liked the softer side better; the firmer face made her shoulder pressure show up earlier. Marcus pressed the edges while putting on shoes and called it “fine for occasional use,” but not the perimeter he’d want nightly.
What we liked
-
Two-sided option that changes the feel without changing the bed
-
Simple, stable surface for straightforward back sleeping
-
Works naturally in compact rooms and lighter-use setups
Who it is best for
-
Guest rooms, dorms, small apartments
-
Lighter sleepers who don’t rely on heavy edge sitting
-
People who want a firm option without a complex build
Where it falls short
-
Thin profile limits deep pressure relief for side sleepers
-
Edge support feels basic when you sit and scoot
-
Less headroom for heavier bodies that compress foam quickly
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Dual-sided design offers two feels | Limited thickness for deep contouring |
| Easy to handle in tight spaces | Basic edge stability for daily use |
| Predictable, steady surface | Not the best match for heavier sleepers |
Details
-
Price: $166.40–$204.00
-
Firmness (tested feel): firm on one side, plusher on the other
-
Size options: TwinXL, Twin, Full
-
Thickness: 7"
-
Type: dual-sided memory foam mattress
-
Shipping: standard free shipping
-
Trial period: -
-
Warranty: 10-year limited
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.7 | Solid for average and lighter bodies; can compress under heavier hips |
| Pressure Relief | 3.5 | Better on the plusher side; thin build limits shoulder sink |
| Cooling | 3.4 | Neutral foam warmth; no standout airflow feel |
| Motion Isolation | 4.2 | Foam damps movement well for a simple build |
| Responsiveness | 3.1 | Slower turns than the Hybrid and Select |
| Edge Support | 3.0 | Acceptable for occasional sitting, not confidence-inspiring nightly |
| Durability | 3.4 | Built to be practical; long-term feel depends on frequency of use |
| Overall | 3.5 | Best as a compact-space or guest-room solution |
Select
Our testing experience
The first night on Select, I noticed the “floating” sensation: it cradles without that slow, deep sink. When I read on my side with a laptop, my hips stayed more level than they did on Ebony, and I didn’t feel like I had to climb out of a trough in the morning. Carlos liked how the surface transitioned—he stayed aligned when he rolled from back to a brief side stretch and then settled flat again. Mia’s feedback was more specific: she felt supported, but on nights where her shoulder was cranky, she wanted a touch more plush give at the top. Marcus cared about heat and support; he called Select “surprisingly controlled” for foam—less heat spike than he expected, and less of the hammocking he hates.
What we liked
-
“On top” feel that stays supportive through the night
-
Easy turning without fighting the foam
-
Balanced alignment for back-to-side combo sleep
Who it is best for
-
Back sleepers and hybrid sleepers who rotate positions
-
People who dislike a deep memory-foam hug
-
Couples who want strong motion damping without feeling stuck
Where it falls short
-
Pressure-sensitive shoulders may prefer a plusher surface
-
Edge support is moderate, not hybrid-level
-
The feel is less “luxury plush” than Ebony
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Buoyant support without deep sink | Not plush enough for some side sleepers |
| More responsive than traditional foam | Edges don’t feel reinforced like a hybrid |
| Broad size and thickness options | People who love a slow hug may prefer Ebony |
Details
-
Price: $303.20–$719.20
-
Firmness (tested feel): medium to medium-firm
-
Size options: TwinXL, Twin, Full, Queen, King, California King
-
Thickness options: 10", 12", 14"
-
Materials (verified): NRGel memory foam + foam base
-
Shipping: standard free shipping
-
Trial period: 100 nights
-
Warranty: 10-year limited
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.1 | Keeps hips up and spine steady for back and combo sleep |
| Pressure Relief | 3.9 | Good contouring; can feel slightly “firm-on-top” at shoulders |
| Cooling | 3.8 | Less heat spike than traditional foam in our rotation |
| Motion Isolation | 4.3 | Partner movement is muted and localized |
| Responsiveness | 3.9 | Turning feels smooth, not sticky |
| Edge Support | 3.6 | Fine for normal use; not as sturdy as the Hybrid |
| Durability | 3.8 | Feel held steady over weeks without obvious softening |
| Overall | 4.0 | The most balanced all-foam option here |
Hybrid
Our testing experience
Hybrid felt immediately different when I rolled onto it: there’s more lift, and turning over takes less effort. On a weeknight after a long day at my desk, that mattered—my lower back didn’t feel like it was sinking and then tightening when I shifted. Marcus was the most decisive on this one. He tends to run hot and he’s quick to notice sag; he said the coil support kept his hips from “dropping,” and the perimeter felt steadier when he sat to put on socks. Carlos liked the stability when he stayed flat on his back—he felt the mattress “catch” him before his mid-back could drift out of neutral. Mia’s one critique was predictable: on her side, she could feel the surface push back a bit more than Ebony, especially when she curled into a tighter position.
What we liked
-
Easiest turning and repositioning of the lineup
-
Stronger edge feel for sitting and sleeping near the perimeter
-
Support stays consistent for heavier bodies
Who it is best for
-
Hot sleepers and people who want more airflow feel
-
Back/stomach sleepers who dislike foam sink
-
Couples who value edges and easier movement
Where it falls short
-
Motion is slightly more noticeable than on all-foam beds
-
Side sleepers wanting a deep hug may prefer Ebony
-
The surface feels more “lifted” than plush
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Pocket coils add lift and edge stability | Slightly more motion transfer than all-foam |
| Easier turning than the foam models | Less deep contouring for side-only sleepers |
| Good balance of pressure relief and support | Not the “plush hug” feel some people want |
Details
-
Price: $303.20–$719.20
-
Firmness (tested feel): medium-firm with lift
-
Size options: Twin, Full, Queen, King
-
Thickness: 10"
-
Materials (verified): gel/NRGel memory foam + 6" pocket coils + perimeter support
-
Shipping: standard free shipping
-
Trial period: -
-
Warranty: 10-year limited
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4 | Most stable under hips and lower back, especially for bigger bodies |
| Pressure Relief | 3.8 | Enough cushion, but less “sink” than Ebony |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Best temperature control feel in our rotation |
| Motion Isolation | 3.7 | Better than many hybrids, but not as quiet as all-foam |
| Responsiveness | 4.3 | Turning is quick and low-effort |
| Edge Support | 4.2 | Noticeably sturdier perimeter for sitting and edge sleep |
| Durability | 4.0 | Coils and perimeter structure suggest stronger long-term stability |
| Overall | 4.1 | The most athletic, easiest-to-live-with option |
Ebony
Our testing experience
Ebony is the mattress we kept calling the “quiet hug.” The first night, I sank in more than I did on Select, and that changed how I read in bed—comfortable, but I had to shift once to keep my hips from settling too deep. Mia liked it immediately. On her side, her shoulder disappeared into the top layer without the “pinch” she felt on firmer surfaces, and her outer hip stayed calmer across longer stretches. Carlos paid attention to alignment; he said it felt best when he stayed centered and let the foam contour evenly, but he noticed a slower transition when he rolled from back to side. Marcus felt the trade-off: the motion damping was great, but he flagged a warmer feel than Hybrid on nights when the room ran stuffy.
What we liked
-
Strong pressure relief for shoulders and hips
-
Excellent motion dampening and “quiet” sleep feel
-
Deep contouring that reduces sharp pressure points
Who it is best for
-
Side sleepers and pressure-sensitive joints
-
Couples who wake easily from movement
-
People who want a more traditional memory-foam feel
Where it falls short
-
Slower to pivot; can feel sticky when changing positions
-
Warmer than Hybrid for hot sleepers
-
Edge support is decent, but not the strongest
Pros and cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Deep contouring for pressure relief | Slower response when turning |
| Strong motion isolation | Can sleep warmer than Hybrid |
| Traditional memory-foam hug | Perimeter is not as firm as the Hybrid |
Details
-
Price: $343.20–$719.20
-
Firmness (tested feel): medium with a deeper hug
-
Size options: TwinXL, Twin, Full, Queen, King
-
Thickness options: 12", 14"
-
Materials (verified): activated-carbon memory foam + foam base
-
Shipping: standard free shipping
-
Trial period: 100 nights
-
Warranty: 10-year limited
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.9 | Supportive if you stay centered; deeper sink can soften the feel |
| Pressure Relief | 4.4 | Best for side-sleep pressure points in our testing |
| Cooling | 3.6 | Better than many foams, still a “hug” that can run warm |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | The quietest surface for partner movement |
| Responsiveness | 3.4 | Turning is slower and more effortful than Hybrid/Select |
| Edge Support | 3.5 | Usable, but not “reinforced” feeling |
| Durability | 3.8 | Foam feel stayed consistent, with normal softening over time |
| Overall | 3.9 | Best choice when pressure relief and motion control lead |
Compare performance scores of these mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The University | 3.5 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 3.4 | 3.1 |
| Select | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 3.9 |
| Hybrid | 4.1 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.3 |
| Ebony | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 3.6 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 3.4 |
Numerically, Select is the most even “all-around” performer—no dramatic weaknesses, just a consistent middle-to-high band. Hybrid clearly leads on Support, Cooling, Responsiveness, and Edge Support, making it the specialist for lift and easy movement. Ebony has the strongest advantage in Pressure Relief and Motion Isolation, while The University trails mainly because its thinner profile limits edge confidence and deep cushioning.
How to choose a Slumber Solutions Mattress
Start with sleep position and turning style. If you rotate positions or want a buoyant surface, pick Select; if you want coil lift and sturdier edges, pick Hybrid. If you live on your side or chase pressure relief, Ebony is the safest bet. The University fits dorms and guest rooms where a compact, flippable mattress is the priority. For hot sleepers, lean Hybrid first, then Select.
Limitations
These mattresses share a practical, value-oriented approach, so you’re trading ultra-premium finishes for straightforward performance. The University is not ideal for heavier sleepers or people who sit on the bed edge daily. Ebony can feel too slow and warm for restless sleepers. Hybrid may not satisfy buyers who want the absolute quietest motion isolation. Select can feel a touch firm at the shoulder for side-only sleepers with pressure sensitivity.
Slumber Solutions Mattress vs. alternatives
Reasons to choose this lineup: clear model roles, simple sizing options, and a consistent “no-frills” performance focus (support, pressure relief, and livability). For a widely available all-foam alternative with a softer hug, consider Nectar Memory Foam for deeper contouring. For a mainstream hybrid alternative with broad firmness choice, consider Brooklyn Bedding Signature Hybrid for more configuration flexibility.
Pro tips for Slumber Solutions Mattress owners
-
Give yourself a consistent two-week routine before you judge soreness versus support.
-
If you sleep hot, pair Hybrid (or Select) with a breathable protector and lighter bedding.
-
For Ebony’s deeper hug, use a slightly flatter pillow to reduce neck tilt on your side.
-
On The University, flip sides intentionally based on whether you need more firmness or more give.
-
If you sit on the edge daily, use a bench or chair for shoes to reduce perimeter wear.
-
Rotate the mattress every few months to even out comfort patterns.
-
For lower-back tightness, try a small knee pillow when back sleeping to keep hips neutral.
-
If motion wakes you up, keep the bed frame stable and tighten hardware monthly.
-
For side sleepers on Select, a softer topper can fine-tune shoulder pressure without changing support.
FAQs
Is the Hybrid noticeably bouncier than the foam models?
Yes—turning is easier and edges feel sturdier, but you may notice slightly more partner motion.
Which model feels best for shoulder pressure on side sleep?
Ebony, because it allows deeper shoulder sink and smoother pressure distribution.
Which is the safest guest-room pick?
The University, since it’s compact, flippable, and predictable for occasional use.
Do these mattresses feel “stuck” like traditional memory foam?
Ebony can; Select and Hybrid feel easier to turn on.