Pikolin’s lineup leans into roll-packed convenience, with several models built around pocket coils (for airflow and lift) and one foam-forward option (for deeper contouring). Across the four mattresses I tested, the biggest differences came down to pressure relief depth, motion isolation, and how “easy” it felt to change positions. If you sleep hot or hate feeling stuck, some models stood out quickly; if you want a quieter, calmer surface, one clearly led.
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marisma | 4.3 | Plush-but-supported feel; stable across positions | Not the snappiest surface | Combo sleepers who want contour without sag | - |
| Galeon | 4.2 | Balanced support; easy position changes | Slightly less cushion than Marisma | Back/side sleepers who want a true medium | - |
| Galeon Compact | 4.0 | Reliable support; clean, steady surface | Thinner feel; less joint buffering | Guest rooms, value buyers, firmer preference | - |
| PikUp Ultra | 4.0 | Best motion control; strong foam contouring | Warmer feel; slower response | Partners, light-to-average side sleepers | - |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the group, we agreed Marisma felt the most “complete” for mixed sleep positions, while Galeon was the easiest to live with night to night. Galeon Compact stayed supportive but gave less cushion at shoulders and hips, especially for lighter side sleepers. PikUp Ultra had the calmest surface for movement, but it also felt warmer and a bit slower to turn on. Marcus favored the coil models for heat control; Mia preferred Marisma’s softer reception; Jamal liked Galeon’s easier rebound.
Pikolin Mattress Comparison Chart
| Feature | Marisma | Galeon | Galeon Compact | PikUp Ultra |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Pocket coil + viscoelastic comfort | Pocket coil + viscoelastic comfort | Pocket coil + viscoelastic comfort | Viscoelastic + HR foam |
| Firmness | Medium-high | Medium | Medium | Medium-high |
| Height | 30 cm | 28 cm | 24 cm | 26 cm |
| Cover | Seaqual fabric | Seaqual fabric | Seaqual fabric | Stretch fabric |
| Support core | Adapt-Tech pocket coils | Adapt-Tech pocket coils | Adapt-Tech pocket coils | HR foam core |
| Standout feel in testing | Deep, even contour with lift | Neutral medium, stable | Flatter, firmer, less depth | Quiet foam hug, less bounce |
| Cooling tendency in testing | Better than foam; steady | Best of the set for airflow feel | Similar to Galeon, slightly less depth | Warmest feel of the four |
| Motion control in testing | Strong | Strong | Good | Best |
How We Tested It
We rotated each mattress through the same routine: back/side sleep blocks, short stomach-nap checks, and “desk-to-bed” evenings where I read and worked with my laptop to see how lumbar support held up. We scored Support, Cooling, Pressure Relief, Motion Isolation, Responsiveness, Edge Support, and Durability using repeatable checks: straightedge alignment, timed heat buildup notes, partner-disturbance simulations, and sit/sleep edge work. The scoring tables below reflect the same metrics for every model.
Pikolin Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Marisma
Our Testing Experience
The first thing I noticed on Marisma was the soft reception—it gave at the shoulders and hips, then stopped sinking before my lower back started complaining. When I rolled from my back to my side, the surface felt “guided” rather than mushy, which kept my hips from dropping. Marcus liked that it didn’t trap heat the way dense foam sometimes does, and he never got that hammocking sensation under his midsection. Mia could stay on her side longer without joint pressure creeping in. Jamal said it had enough stability to push off and reposition without wrestling the mattress.
What we liked
-
Even contouring without losing spinal lift
-
Stable feel when shifting positions
-
Noticeably comfortable shoulder/hip relief
Who it is best for
-
Combo sleepers who bounce between back and side
-
Side sleepers who want cushioning without a deep sink
-
People who wake up with lower-back tightness
Where it falls short
-
Not the most springy option for people who want a quick, buoyant surface
-
Those who prefer a flatter, firmer top may find it too welcoming
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Soft reception with supportive lift | Less “bounce” than the most responsive coil builds |
| Strong pressure relief for side sleeping | May feel too plush for firm-only shoppers |
| Stable feel across positions | - |
Details
-
Firmness: Medium-high
-
Height: 30 cm
-
Type: Pocket coil roll-up mattress with viscoelastic comfort layers
-
Comfort system: Progression Visco padding (Supersoft + Viscofoam blend)
-
Support core: Adapt-Tech pocket coil core
-
Cover: Seaqual fabric
-
Hygienic treatment: Triple Barrier protection
-
Delivery format: Rolled; express shipping referenced as under 72 hours
-
Trial period: 30 nights
-
Warranty: 3 years
-
Old mattress removal: Included on the product page
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.5 | Kept hips and lumbar from dropping during long back-to-side nights. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.4 | Best blend of cushion and lift for shoulders/outer hips. |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Stayed more breathable-feeling than foam, especially for Marcus. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.3 | Pocket coils plus comfort layers muted movement well. |
| Responsiveness | 4.0 | Changes were smooth, but not “springy-fast.” |
| Edge Support | 4.2 | Solid sit edge; slight compression but not unstable. |
| Durability | 4.4 | Robust build feel; maintained support consistency over the test window. |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Most well-rounded performance across the team. |
Galeon
Our Testing Experience
Galeon read as a true medium the moment I lay down—less plush than Marisma, but very even and predictable. When I sat to put on shoes, the edge compressed a bit, yet I never felt like it wanted to slide me off. Sleeping on my back, it held my lumbar area up without forcing an arched posture, and side sleeping felt stable rather than “pillowy.” Marcus called this the easiest model to manage for heat: it simply didn’t feel like it held onto warmth. Mia liked it but wanted a touch more give at the shoulder on longer side-sleep stretches. Jamal appreciated how easy it was to turn—no delay, no sticky foam sensation.
What we liked
-
Neutral medium feel that stayed consistent
-
Easy repositioning with steady support
-
Good balance for back and side switching
Who it is best for
-
Back sleepers who want a straightforward medium
-
Combination sleepers who change positions often
-
Hot sleepers who dislike heat buildup
Where it falls short
-
Lighter side sleepers may prefer a softer top layer
-
If you want deep contouring, it won’t feel as plush as Marisma
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Balanced, stable medium feel | Less plush cushioning than Marisma |
| Easy movement and repositioning | Some side sleepers may want more shoulder give |
| Strong airflow feel compared with foam | - |
Details
-
Firmness: Medium
-
Height: 28 cm
-
Type: Pocket coil spring mattress with viscoelastic comfort
-
Comfort system: Viscofoam comfort layer plus additional padding layers
-
Support core: Adapt-Tech pocket coil core
-
Cover: Seaqual outer fabric
-
Hygienic treatment: Triple Barrier protection
-
Delivery format: Rolled; express shipping referenced as under 72 hours
-
Trial period: 30 nights
-
Warranty: 3 years
-
Old mattress removal: Included on the product page
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.3 | Steady, neutral support; strong for back and mixed sleeping. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.1 | Comfortable, but lighter side sleepers wanted more cushioning. |
| Cooling | 4.3 | Best “airflow feel” of the four during warm nights. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.2 | Pocket coil build controlled movement well in our checks. |
| Responsiveness | 4.1 | Easy turning, minimal lag when changing positions. |
| Edge Support | 4.1 | Secure enough for sitting and sleep-near-edge use. |
| Durability | 4.3 | Consistent feel over the test; no early softening cues. |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | The most straightforward, easy-to-live-with option. |
Galeon Compact
Our Testing Experience
Galeon Compact felt like the no-nonsense sibling: the surface was comfortable, but it didn’t have the same depth as the taller models. On my back, that translated to a clean, supportive feel—my hips stayed up, and I didn’t have to “find” the support. On my side, I had to pay more attention to pillow height because my shoulder didn’t sink as much. Marcus liked how stable it felt under his hips, but he also noticed the edge had a little more compression when he perched on it in the morning. Mia felt more pressure at the shoulder after longer side stretches. Jamal liked the easier movement, but he said it lacked the richer cushioning he prefers after training days.
What we liked
-
Reliable support with a flatter, steadier top feel
-
Good value-style comfort without being flimsy
-
Easy movement with minimal sink
Who it is best for
-
Back sleepers who prefer a cleaner, firmer surface
-
Guest-room shoppers who want dependable support
-
People who dislike deep contouring
Where it falls short
-
Lighter side sleepers may feel shoulder/hip pressure sooner
-
Those chasing a plush, “hotel-top” sensation won’t get it here
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Stable support and straightforward feel | Less cushioning depth than the taller models |
| Easy repositioning | Can feel firm at shoulders for side sleepers |
| Breathable coil-based feel | Edge compresses a bit more under sitting weight |
Details
-
Firmness: Medium
-
Height: 24 cm
-
Type: Pocket coil spring and viscoelastic roll-up mattress
-
Comfort system: Viscofoam comfort layer with additional padding layers
-
Support core: Adapt-Tech pocket coil core
-
Cover: Seaqual outer fabric
-
Hygienic treatment: Triple Barrier protection
-
Delivery format: Rolled; express shipping referenced as under 72 hours
-
Trial period: 30 nights
-
Warranty: 3 years
-
Old mattress removal: Included on the product page
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.1 | Support was dependable, especially for back sleeping alignment. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.8 | Less depth; shoulder pressure appeared sooner for Mia. |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Coil-based feel stayed relatively fresh overnight. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Controlled movement well, though not as quiet as foam. |
| Responsiveness | 4.0 | Easy to change positions; minimal “stuck” feeling. |
| Edge Support | 3.9 | Fine for normal use, but more compression under sitting weight. |
| Durability | 4.1 | Maintained shape and consistency during the test cycle. |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | A practical pick with clear comfort trade-offs. |
PikUp Ultra
Our Testing Experience
PikUp Ultra had the most obvious personality shift: it felt quieter and more absorbent, like the mattress was swallowing movement rather than bouncing it back. When I lay on my side, my shoulder settled in quickly, and my hips felt cushioned—good for pressure relief—but I also noticed a slower response when I rolled back to my spine. Marcus immediately flagged warmth: not suffocating, but the foam feel held more heat than the coil models. Mia liked the contouring and said it felt protective at the joints. Jamal was the most divided—he liked the support under him, but he didn’t love how much effort it took to turn when the foam had fully warmed up.
What we liked
-
Best motion isolation of the group
-
Noticeable contouring at shoulders and hips
-
Calm, quiet surface feel
Who it is best for
-
Couples sensitive to movement
-
Side sleepers who like a foam-forward hug
-
People who prefer a less bouncy top
Where it falls short
-
Hot sleepers may prefer the coil models
-
Responsive “springy” fans will find it slower to turn on
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent motion control | Warmer feel than the coil models |
| Strong pressure relief and contouring | Slower response when repositioning |
| Supportive foam build | Edge can feel softer when perched |
Details
-
Firmness: Medium-high
-
Height: 26 cm
-
Type: Viscoelastic and HR foam roll-up mattress
-
Comfort system: Viscofoam Soft + Viscofoam Firm comfort layers
-
Support core: HR foam core with additional foam layers
-
Cover: Stretch fabric (outer fabric noted as polyester)
-
Breathability elements: Polyester fibre layer designed to allow airflow
-
Delivery format: Rolled; express shipping referenced as under 72 hours
-
Trial period: 30 nights
-
Warranty: 3 years
-
Old mattress removal: Included on the product page
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2 | Support stayed steady, but felt more foam-contoured than lifted. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Great joint cushioning; strong for side sleeping comfort. |
| Cooling | 3.7 | Warmest feel in our testing, especially for Marcus. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | The clear leader for reducing movement transfer. |
| Responsiveness | 3.7 | Slower turning once the foam warmed and settled. |
| Edge Support | 3.8 | Acceptable for sleeping near edge, softer for sitting. |
| Durability | 4.1 | HR foam core suggests stable support over time. |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Best for motion control; trade-offs in cooling and bounce. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness | Edge Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marisma | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.2 |
| Galeon | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.1 |
| Galeon Compact | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 3.9 |
| PikUp Ultra | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 3.8 |
Marisma performed the most evenly, with the best overall balance between contouring and stable lift. Galeon was close behind, winning on ease of movement and the most consistently cool-feeling nights. PikUp Ultra had a clear advantage in motion isolation but gave back points in cooling and responsiveness. Galeon Compact delivered solid support for the score, but its thinner comfort feel showed up in pressure relief and edge behavior.
How to Choose a Pikolin Mattress
Start with sleep position and heat sensitivity. If you rotate between back and side and want cushion without sink, Marisma is the safest bet. If you want a true medium with easier movement and better airflow feel, Galeon fits best. If you prefer a flatter, firmer surface or you’re furnishing a guest room, Galeon Compact is the practical option. If you share a bed and you hate being disturbed by movement, PikUp Ultra is the motion-control pick.
Limitations
The main trade-off across this set is that the coil models emphasize a lifted, breathable feel, while the foam model emphasizes quiet contouring—so you’re always choosing a priority. Galeon Compact can feel a bit shallow for side sleepers with sensitive shoulders. PikUp Ultra runs warmer and is slower to change positions, which can frustrate restless sleepers. If you demand a very firm, ultra-flat surface, Marisma may feel too welcoming at first contact.
Pikolin Mattress vs Alternatives
Why choose these models
- You want roll-packed convenience with a build that still feels supportive and structured
- You prefer pocket-coil responsiveness and airflow, or a foam option tuned for motion control
- You want a clearly tiered lineup where feel differences show up quickly in real use
Alternatives to consider
- Saatva Classic (innerspring): multiple firmness options and in-room delivery/setup
- Helix Midnight (hybrid): designed around side-sleeper pressure relief with wrapped coils
- Nectar Classic (all-foam): medium-firm memory foam feel with long home-trial positioning
Pro Tips for Pikolin Mattress
-
Give roll-packed mattresses enough time to fully expand before judging firmness and feel.
-
Match pillow height to the mattress: thinner comfort layers usually need a slightly lower pillow for side sleeping.
-
If you run hot, prioritize breathable bedding and keep the protector thin to avoid trapping heat.
-
For side sleepers, test shoulder comfort after 30–60 minutes, not just the first five minutes.
-
If you sit on the edge daily, rotate your sitting spot to reduce localized wear.
-
Use a stable base and avoid flexy foundations if you’re sensitive to lower-back support.
-
For motion sensitivity, focus on foam-forward builds or pocket-coil models with thicker comfort layers.
-
Rotate the mattress periodically so the comfort layers wear more evenly.
-
Give “warm foam” a fair test: responsiveness can change once the surface reaches body temperature.
FAQs
Q: Which model felt best for mixed back-and-side sleeping?
A: Marisma stayed the most balanced when I switched positions and still wanted lumbar lift.
Q: Which mattress minimized movement the most?
A: PikUp Ultra absorbed motion the best and felt the calmest when someone shifted nearby.
Q: Which one felt coolest overnight?
A: Galeon stayed the most consistently fresh-feeling across warm nights.
Q: Which is the best pick for a guest room?
A: Galeon Compact delivered dependable support without feeling fragile or overly specialized.
