Nutan Mattress offerings skew toward traditional innerspring and spring-forward hybrid builds with a straightforward comfort goal: dependable support with a plush-to-firmer top feel, usually at a midrange price that can climb when bundled with foundations. I evaluated support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability. The lineup fits sleepers who want a classic bounce, but some models won’t suit heat-sensitive or motion-sensitive couples.
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutan 12-Inch Double-Sided Pillowtop Innerspring | 4.3 | Strong support, stable edges, balanced plushness | Tall profile in set form, not the quietest | Back sleepers, combo sleepers, people who want a classic spring feel |
| Nutan 10-Inch Eurotop Pillowtop Innerspring | 4.1 | Responsive surface, easy position changes | More partner movement felt than foam | Combo sleepers, people who dislike “stuck” foam |
| Nutan 8-Inch Gentle Firm Innerspring | 3.9 | Firm-leaning control, breathable quilted top feel | Less cushion for sharp side-sleep pressure points | Back/stomach sleepers, budget setups, guest rooms |
| Nutan 9-Inch High Density Foam | 3.8 | Strong motion isolation, quieter surface | Warmer feel for hot sleepers, softer edges | Light-to-average sleepers, couples sensitive to motion |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the four, the 12-inch double-sided pillowtop felt the most “complete” overnight—supportive with enough cushion to avoid morning stiffness. The 10-inch eurotop stayed lively and easy to move on, but couples noticed more transfer. The 8-inch gentle firm impressed on posture control yet asked side sleepers to add softness. The 9-inch foam muted partner movement best, though it slept warmer and edged out less securely.
Nutan Mattress Comparison Chart
| Model | Type | Feel (listed) | Thickness / Profile | Cover | Support design notes | Motion isolation (test) | Cooling (test) | Edge support (test) | Sizes (listed) | Return window (listed) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12-Inch Double-Sided Pillowtop Innerspring (with 4" foundation) | Innerspring | Medium plush | 12" mattress + 4" foundation (approx. 16" profile) | Damask cotton pillowtop | Verticoil innerspring referenced in listing | Good | Good | Very good | Twin–Cal King | 30 days |
| 10-Inch Eurotop Pillowtop Innerspring (with 4" foundation) | Innerspring | Medium plush / orthopedic type plush | 10" mattress + 4" foundation (14" profile stated) | - | Innerspring “verticoil” referenced in listing | Fair | Good | Good | Twin–Cal King | - |
| 8-Inch Gentle Firm Innerspring | Innerspring with foam layers | Gentle firm | 8" | Damask quilted cushion top | Coils between foam layers | Fair | Good | Good | - | - |
| 9-Inch High Density Foam | Foam | Medium firm | 9" | - | High density foam | Very good | Fair | Fair | - | - |
How We Tested It
I rotated these mattresses through real nightly use, short naps, and long “read in bed” sessions while tracking seven metrics: Support, Cooling, Pressure Relief, Motion Isolation, Responsiveness, Edge Support, and Durability. Marcus focused on heat buildup and midline support under a heavier load. Jenna and Ethan ran couple tests—entry/exit, tossing, and edge drift. I kept the scoring anchored to what we consistently felt after repeated nights, not a single first impression.
Nutan Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Nutan 12-Inch Double-Sided Pillowtop Innerspring
Our Testing Experience
The first night, I noticed how quickly the surface settled under my hips without letting my lower back dip—one of those “ah, my spine is level” moments when you exhale and stop micro-adjusting. Marcus put it through a hotter room test and still felt decent airflow at the top. Jenna and Ethan ran their usual routine: he got up twice, slid back in, and she stayed mostly undisturbed—there was movement, but it didn’t ripple across the whole bed the way a bouncier spring can.
What we liked:
-
Support stayed consistent from center to near-edge
-
Comfortable cushion without a deep sink
-
Easy turning and repositioning
Who it is best for:
-
Back sleepers and combo sleepers
-
Couples who want spring support without constant shake
-
People who sit on the edge often
Where it falls short:
-
Taller, more “traditional set” feel in the bundled configuration
-
Sensitive sleepers may still notice some spring energy
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Balanced plushness with supportive control | Bundled profile can feel tall |
| Strong edge stability | Not as motion-deadening as dense foam |
| Easy movement, no “stuck” feel | Spring feel may be noticeable to ultra-light sleepers |
Details
-
Type: Innerspring, pillowtop, double-sided design described
-
Listed materials/finish: Damask cotton pillowtop; quilted pillowtop with comfort foam layers
-
Profile: 12" mattress with 4" foundation option; 16" dimensions shown for set
-
Coil/support notes: “357” and “verticoil” referenced in listing
-
Compliance: Federal fire code standards referenced
-
Return window (listing): 30-day returns
-
Price observed (King set): $1,872.62
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.6 | Kept hips and mid-back stable through full nights |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Marcus noted manageable heat buildup for a plush top |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Enough give at shoulders/hips without collapsing |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Couple movement damped reasonably well for a spring build |
| Responsiveness | 4.4 | Quick, predictable rebound when turning |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | Strong sitting and near-edge sleeping stability |
| Durability | 4.3 | Double-sided concept and firm core feel promising over time |
| Overall | 4.3 | Best blend of “classic support + usable comfort” |
Nutan 10-Inch Eurotop Pillowtop Innerspring
Our Testing Experience
This one felt more “get in, move around, fall asleep” than “sink and nest.” I could roll from back to side without needing a reset, and that mattered on nights when my lower back was tight from desk work. Ethan’s verdict came fast: “It lets me turn without thinking about it,” and he meant it—no sticky resistance. The trade-off showed up in couple testing: when he dropped onto the bed, Jenna felt it more clearly than on the thicker double-sided option. Still, the surface stayed clean and supportive enough that none of us woke up feeling folded.
What we liked:
-
Quick turning and easy repositioning
-
Supportive, “classic mattress” posture feel
-
Stable enough for sitting tasks (shoes, stretching)
Who it is best for:
-
Combo sleepers who change positions a lot
-
People who dislike slow-responding foam
-
Couples who tolerate some motion but want bounce
Where it falls short:
-
More partner movement felt than on foam-heavy builds
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Responsive surface for movement | Motion travels more than on dense foam |
| Supportive feel under hips and lower back | Not a “hugging” pressure-relief style |
| Works well for mixed sleeping positions | Some specs vary by listing and size |
Details
-
Type: Eurotop pillowtop innerspring mattress with wood box spring set described
-
Feel (listed): Medium plush / “orthopedic type plush” referenced
-
Profile: 10" mattress with 4" box spring; 14" heights shown in size list
-
Sizes (listed): Twin, Twin XL, Full, Full XL, Queen, King, California King
-
Assembly: “No assembly required” language present
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.3 | Strong posture control without feeling rigid |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Breathable “spring-forward” feel in practice |
| Pressure Relief | 3.9 | Comfortable, but less cushioning for sharp joints |
| Motion Isolation | 3.6 | Jenna felt more partner movement during entry/exit |
| Responsiveness | 4.5 | Fast, easy turning—no lag |
| Edge Support | 4.1 | Solid sit and edge drift control |
| Durability | 4.0 | Felt sturdy, though thinner build may show wear sooner |
| Overall | 4.1 | Best for sleepers who prioritize movement and support |
Nutan 9-Inch High Density Foam
Our Testing Experience
The first impression was quiet—no spring liveliness, just a steady, muted surface. Jenna liked that Ethan could shift around without turning her half into a trampoline, and that held up over multiple nights. For me, the foam did a decent job keeping my hips from dropping too far, but I had to pay attention to heat: after a couple hours, the surface felt warmer than the spring models. The edge was the other tell—when I sat to pull on socks, it compressed more and felt less confident. If you like a calmer bed that mutes movement, it delivered; if you want airy bounce, it didn’t.
What we liked:
-
Strong motion isolation for partner movement
-
Quiet surface with a steady feel
-
Even support for back-lying stretches
Who it is best for:
-
Couples sensitive to movement
-
Sleepers who prefer a foam feel over bounce
-
Guest rooms where quiet matters
Where it falls short:
-
Warmer overnight feel than the innerspring options
-
Softer edge stability for sitting and edge drift
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent motion isolation | Can feel warmer overnight |
| Quiet, stable surface | Edge compresses more than springs |
| Medium-firm control for posture | Less “lift” for easy bounce lovers |
Details
-
Type: High density foam mattress
-
Feel (listed): Medium firm
-
Thickness: 9"
-
Example dimensions/weight (varies by size): 84" x 72" x 9" and 49 lb shown for California King
-
Certification (listing): CertiPUR-US referenced
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.9 | Good alignment, but less “lift” than springs |
| Cooling | 3.4 | Warmth built up more noticeably overnight |
| Pressure Relief | 4.1 | Cushioned feel helped reduce localized pressure |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | Best at keeping partner movement from spreading |
| Responsiveness | 3.6 | Slower rebound when changing positions |
| Edge Support | 3.4 | Edge compressed during sitting and near-edge sleep |
| Durability | 3.7 | Support felt consistent, but edges felt less robust |
| Overall | 3.8 | Best for motion control; weaker on cooling and edges |
Nutan 8-Inch Gentle Firm Innerspring
Our Testing Experience
This one felt the most “no-nonsense” the moment I lay down: firmer control, less plush buffer, and a clear sense of the support core underneath. Marcus liked that it didn’t give him that hammocking sag in the hips, and he also reported less heat buildup than on thicker, cushier tops. For me, the posture control was excellent on my back, but on my side I had to stack my pillow more carefully to keep my shoulder from feeling crowded. Jenna and Ethan agreed it’s a strong guest-room pick: easy to get comfortable quickly, but not the soft, luxurious landing you’d choose if you crave deep cushioning.
What we liked:
-
Firm-leaning support that stays controlled
-
Breathable quilted top feel in practice
-
Stable edges for sitting and getting up
Who it is best for:
-
Back and stomach sleepers
-
Heavier sleepers who fear sag
-
Guest rooms and simpler setups
Where it falls short:
-
Less forgiving for sensitive shoulders/hips on side sleep
-
Not the most motion-deadening option
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong posture control | Side sleepers may want more cushion |
| Breathable quilted cushion top | Motion is more noticeable than foam |
| Dependable edge behavior | Less “luxury plush” feel |
Details
-
Type: Innerspring coils positioned between foam layers
-
Feel (listed): Gentle firm
-
Thickness: 8"
-
Cover: Damask quilted cushion top referenced
-
Compliance: 16 CFR 1633 referenced
-
Example listing size: Twin
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4 | Strong control under hips and midline |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Less heat buildup than thicker plush builds |
| Pressure Relief | 3.5 | Firmness reduced “sink,” but increased joint pressure |
| Motion Isolation | 3.5 | Spring energy shows up more during partner movement |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Easy turning and stable transitions |
| Edge Support | 4.0 | Solid sitting and edge use for an 8" build |
| Durability | 3.9 | Felt sturdy, but thinner comfort layer may show wear |
| Overall | 3.9 | A firm-leaning, practical performer with clear trade-offs |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nutan 12-Inch Double-Sided Pillowtop Innerspring | 4.3 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.4 |
| Nutan 10-Inch Eurotop Pillowtop Innerspring | 4.1 | 4.3 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| Nutan 8-Inch Gentle Firm Innerspring | 3.9 | 4.4 | 3.5 | 4.2 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 4.2 |
| Nutan 9-Inch High Density Foam | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 3.4 | 4.6 | 3.7 | 3.6 |
The most evenly balanced pick is the 12-inch double-sided pillowtop, with no glaring weakness and strong support/edge scores. The foam model clearly wins motion isolation but gives back points on cooling and edges. The 10-inch eurotop leads on responsiveness, while the 8-inch gentle firm stands out for posture control and cooler sleep at the cost of plush pressure relief.
How to Choose the Nutan Mattress?
Prioritize sleep position and sensitivity first: side sleepers usually need more cushioning, while back/stomach sleepers often do better with firmer control. If you sleep hot, lean toward the spring models. For couples, decide whether you hate motion more than you love bounce. Quick picks: heavier back sleepers—12-inch double-sided or 8-inch gentle firm; combo sleepers—10-inch eurotop; motion-sensitive couples—9-inch high density foam; guest room—8-inch gentle firm.
Limitations
Across the line, the biggest trade-off is between spring responsiveness and motion control: the more “classic bounce” you get, the more partner movement you may feel. The 8-inch gentle firm can run too tight for shoulder-sensitive side sleepers. The foam model’s edges and overnight warmth make it a weaker fit for hot sleepers or those who sit on the perimeter frequently.
Nutan Mattress Vs. Alternatives
-
Why choose these models:
-
You want a traditional, supportive feel with easy movement
-
You prefer straightforward builds over complex zoned designs
-
You value edge stability and a stable “set” style option
-
-
Alternatives to consider:
-
Saatva Classic: for a more refined, luxury-leaning innerspring feel
-
Helix Midnight: for a balanced hybrid tuned for broader side-sleep comfort
-
Nectar Memory Foam: for shoppers who want a more enveloping foam sensation and strong motion control
-
Pro Tips for Nutan Mattress
-
Give your body a consistent routine for a week before judging comfort changes.
-
If you feel shoulder pressure on firmer models, adjust pillow height before changing the mattress.
-
For spring models, use a sturdy frame with center support to keep the surface stable.
-
If you share the bed, test entry/exit and edge drift early so you know what to expect.
-
Add breathable bedding if you run hot; it can matter as much as the mattress feel.
-
If the edge compresses more than you like, sit closer to the corner support zone instead of dead-center.
-
Rotate the mattress periodically to help even out wear patterns.
-
If you prefer quieter sleep, consider a thin, breathable topper on spring models to dampen surface vibration.
-
Match firmness to your most common position, not the one you start in.
FAQs
Which Nutan model felt best for lower-back support?
The 12-inch double-sided pillowtop gave me the most consistent lumbar stability overnight, with the 8-inch gentle firm close behind when I stayed on my back.
Which Nutan model is most couple-friendly?
The 9-inch high density foam muted partner movement best, while the 12-inch double-sided pillowtop was the most balanced spring option for shared sleep.
Which Nutan model is easiest to move around on?
The 10-inch eurotop was the quickest for turning and repositioning, especially for restless sleepers who change posture multiple times a night.