New Braunfels Mattress’ sale lineup leans heavily into bed-in-a-box convenience and approachable pricing, with both all-foam and hybrid builds. I tested four popular discounted options for support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability. The short version: the hybrids feel steadier and easier to move on, while the all-foam picks win on quiet, low-motion sleep.
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nectar Classic Memory Foam | 4.1 | Strong motion isolation; deep contouring | Slower to turn; edges can compress | Side/back sleepers who want a quieter foam feel | From $349 |
| Nectar Classic Hybrid | 4.3 | More support and airflow; easier turning | Slightly more motion than all-foam | Combination sleepers; heavier sleepers needing steadier hips | From $469 |
| Puffy Cloud Mattress | 4.0 | Soft-on-top comfort; very low partner disturbance | Thin profile can feel less substantial | Guest rooms; lighter sleepers who like a plush start | From $499 |
| Nectar Premier Hybrid | 4.4 | Most balanced; best cooling/pressure blend | More “mattress” feel than minimalist foam | Hot sleepers; side sleepers needing shoulder relief without sag | From $549 |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across weeks of swaps, Nectar Premier Hybrid felt the most even from head to toe, especially when I was switching between back and side sleeping. Marcus preferred the two hybrids for hip stability and less heat buildup. Mia consistently liked the plushest pressure relief on her shoulders from the Classic Memory Foam and Premier Hybrid. Carlos favored the Classic Hybrid’s “foam to support” transition, calling it the least fussy when rolling slowly.
New Braunfels Mattress Comparison Chart
| Feature | Nectar Classic Memory Foam | Nectar Classic Hybrid | Puffy Cloud Mattress | Nectar Premier Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | All-foam | Hybrid | All-foam | Hybrid |
| Firmness feel | Medium-firm | Medium-firm | Medium-firm | Medium |
| Profile height | 12" | 12" | 10" | 13" |
| Available sizes | Twin–Cal King | Twin–Cal King | Twin–Cal King | Twin–Cal King |
| Construction notes | 5 layers; fiberglass-free | Coils + 6 layers; fiberglass-free | 6-layer system; cooling cover/foam | Coils + cooling fibers; fiberglass-free |
| Cooling approach | Cool-to-touch cover | Cool-to-touch cover + airflow coils | Cooling cover + cooling foam | More cooling fibers + airflow coils |
| Best “team fit” | Quiet foam comfort | Best value balance | Plush starter feel | Most complete performer |
| Motion isolation (our tests) | Excellent | Very good | Excellent | Very good |
| Edge support (our tests) | Fair–good | Good | Fair | Good |
| Turning/ease of movement | Moderate | Good | Moderate | Good |
How We Tested It
We ran each mattress through the same checklist: Support, Cooling, Pressure Relief, Motion Isolation, Responsiveness, Edge Support, and Durability. I did nightly rotations (back to side), plus “reading-in-bed” time to catch lumbar drift and hip sink. Marcus focused on heat buildup, edge sit-down stability, and stomach-sleep hip support. Mia tracked shoulder/hip pressure on long side-sleep stretches, while Carlos checked alignment by feel during slow turns and extended back-sleep periods. Dr. Adrian Walker reviewed our posture notes and helped sanity-check where “soft comfort” turned into “misalignment.”
New Braunfels Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Nectar Classic Memory Foam
Our Testing Experience
The first thing I noticed was how quickly the top layer settled around my shoulders and hips when I rolled onto my side. After a long desk day, my lower back felt quietly supported as long as I didn’t let my hips drop too deep. Mia liked how the surface “gave” under her shoulder without forcing her neck up. Carlos kept calling it consistent—no sudden drop through the comfort layers—but he also said turning felt a touch sticky. Marcus ran warm after about half an hour and preferred it with lighter bedding. The best moment was our motion test: the surface stayed calm even with shifting and getting in and out.
What we liked
-
Excellent motion isolation and a calmer surface feel
-
Pressure relief that favors side sleeping
-
Gentle, steady contouring during long lying periods
Who it is best for
-
Side sleepers wanting shoulder/hip sink without sharp pressure
-
Couples who hate being woken by movement
-
Back sleepers who like a slower, hugging foam feel
Where it falls short
-
Hot sleepers who need strong airflow
-
People who want quick bounce for easy turning
-
Anyone who sits on the edge a lot
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong motion isolation | Slower responsiveness |
| Plush pressure relief | Edge compresses when seated |
| Stable, even contour | Can sleep warmer for hot sleepers |
Details
-
Price: From $349
-
Type: Memory foam mattress
-
Firmness: Medium-firm
-
Height: 12"
-
Layers/material notes: 5 layers; OEKO-TEX Standard 100 fabrics; CertiPUR-US foams; fiberglass-free construction
-
Cooling: Cool-to-the-touch cover
-
Sizes listed: Twin (39" x 74"), Twin XL (39" x 80"), Full (54" x 74"), Queen (60" x 80"), King (76" x 80"), Cal King (72" x 84")
-
Shipping/fulfillment options shown: delivery availability, pickup, setup/haul-away noted on listing
-
Trial period: 365-night home trial
-
Warranty: Forever Warranty
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.1 | Solid for back/side, but can feel softer under hips over time |
| Pressure Relief | 4.4 | Consistently friendly to shoulders and outer hips |
| Cooling | 3.9 | Cool initial feel, but foam warmth builds for hot sleepers |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | Minimal disturbance during shifts and “get-up” moments |
| Responsiveness | 3.8 | Noticeably slower turning than the hybrids |
| Edge Support | 3.7 | Fine lying near the edge, weaker for prolonged sitting |
| Durability | 4.0 | Even support feel over weeks, no obvious early soft spots |
| Overall | 4.1 | Best for quiet foam comfort and pressure relief |
Nectar Classic Hybrid
Our Testing Experience
Switching from the all-foam bed to this hybrid felt like stepping onto a surface that “pushes back” sooner. I could feel the comfort layer contour, but I didn’t sink as deep, and my hips stayed more level when I rolled onto my back. Marcus liked it immediately for stomach sleeping because the coil support reduced that hammock sensation. Mia said it was still cushioned enough, but she noticed more surface “lift” under her shoulder, which she liked on nights she wanted a slightly firmer feel. Carlos focused on the transition and called it the smoothest of the group: soft entry, then stable support without a sudden drop.
What we liked
-
Stronger hip support than the all-foam options
-
Easier turning with less “stuck” feeling
-
Better airflow feel during warm nights
Who it is best for
-
Combination sleepers who change positions often
-
Heavier sleepers needing steadier hips and lower back
-
Anyone who wants foam comfort without the slow response
Where it falls short
-
People who want the dead-quiet feel of all-foam
-
Very sensitive side sleepers who need extra shoulder sink
-
Those who prefer a plush, deep cradle
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Supportive coil core improves stability | Slightly more motion than all-foam |
| Good balance of contour and pushback | Can feel firmer to lightweight side sleepers |
| Better airflow feel | Not as “melting” for pressure relief lovers |
Details
-
Price: From $469
-
Type: Hybrid mattress
-
Firmness: Medium-firm
-
Height: 12"
-
Layers/material notes: 6 layers; OEKO-TEX Standard 100 fabrics; CertiPUR-US foams; fiberglass-free construction
-
Support core: Individually wrapped coils
-
Cooling: Cool-to-the-touch cover; coils increase airflow
-
Sizes listed: Twin (39" x 74"), Twin XL (39" x 80"), Full (54" x 74"), Queen (60" x 80"), King (76" x 80"), Cal King (72" x 84")
-
Shipping/fulfillment options shown: delivery availability, pickup, setup/haul-away noted on listing
-
Trial period: 365-night home trial
-
Warranty: Forever Warranty
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4 | Stronger hip control and less sag under mixed positions |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3 | Cushioned enough for side sleep, firmer than all-foam |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Better airflow feel; less “heat hold” than foam-only |
| Motion Isolation | 4.3 | Very good, but coil feedback is slightly more noticeable |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Easier turning and repositioning through the night |
| Edge Support | 4.1 | More stable for sitting and lying near the perimeter |
| Durability | 4.3 | Supportive “core” feel stays consistent over weeks |
| Overall | 4.3 | Most practical all-around value in this group |
Puffy Cloud Mattress
Our Testing Experience
This one starts soft and welcoming, and it immediately reads “cozy” when you sit down. I liked it best on nights when I wanted a gentler landing, especially after a longer workout stretch session. Mia called it the most inviting at first contact and said it reduced shoulder pressure quickly. Carlos liked how quiet and steady the surface stayed during slow turns, but he also noted that the 10-inch build felt less substantial than the taller Nectar beds. Marcus was the toughest critic: on stomach-sleep moments, he could feel his hips sink sooner, and he preferred something with more resistance under his midsection. For motion isolation, though, it was a standout—partner disturbance stayed low.
What we liked
-
Soft-on-top comfort without feeling mushy right away
-
Strong motion isolation for a foam build
-
Cooling cover feel is noticeable on contact
Who it is best for
-
Lighter-to-average sleepers who like a plush start
-
Guest rooms where easy comfort matters most
-
Couples prioritizing low movement disturbance
Where it falls short
-
Heavier stomach sleepers needing firmer hip control
-
People who want strong edge sitting support
-
Anyone who dislikes a softer, “hug” entry feel
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Cozy surface feel | Less supportive for heavier stomach sleepers |
| Excellent motion isolation | Edge support is only fair |
| Cooling cover/foam positioning | Thin profile feels less substantial |
Details
-
Price: From $499
-
Type: Memory foam mattress
-
Firmness: Medium-firm
-
Height: 10"
-
Materials/layers noted: Cloud Comfort Pressure Relief Foam; Firm Core Support Foam; Cool Touch Quilted Cloud Cover; Cooling Cloud foam
-
Sizes listed: Twin (39" x 74"), Twin XL (39" x 80"), Full (54" x 74"), Queen (60" x 80"), King (76" x 80"), Cal King (72" x 84")
-
Shipping/fulfillment options shown: delivery availability, pickup, setup/haul-away noted on listing
-
Trial period: 101-night sleep trial
-
Warranty: Lifetime warranty
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.9 | Comfortable, but less midsection resistance for heavier sleepers |
| Pressure Relief | 4.1 | Good shoulder/hip comfort for lighter side sleepers |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Cooling layers help, but foam still warms with heavy bedding |
| Motion Isolation | 4.5 | Very low disturbance on movement tests |
| Responsiveness | 3.9 | Moderate ease of turning, not as quick as hybrids |
| Edge Support | 3.6 | Noticeable compression when sitting near the edge |
| Durability | 3.9 | Felt consistent short-term; thinner profile is the trade-off |
| Overall | 4.0 | Best as a cozy, quiet foam option at sale pricing |
Nectar Premier Hybrid
Our Testing Experience
This was the most “complete” feeling bed in the lineup—taller, more substantial, and calmer than I expected for a hybrid. When I switched from side to back, my hips stayed level and my lower back didn’t feel like it had to fight the mattress. Mia immediately noticed that her shoulder could sink without her torso twisting, and she stayed on her side longer before needing to reposition. Marcus liked the cooler feel across the night and said it avoided that sweaty mid-back build-up he gets on denser foams. Carlos focused on the transition and called it the most refined: soft enough at the top, then a stable coil-supported base. The only nitpick was that it has a slightly more cushioned, layered feel than the Classic Hybrid, so it’s not the “snappy” option.
What we liked
-
Strong balance of contouring and support
-
Best cooling feel in this group
-
Pressure relief that stays consistent across positions
Who it is best for
-
Hot sleepers who still want a plush top
-
Side sleepers needing shoulder relief without sag
-
Combination sleepers who want stability first
Where it falls short
-
People who want the fastest, springiest response
-
Shoppers who prefer thinner, minimalist builds
-
Anyone who wants a very firm surface feel
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Most balanced performance overall | Slightly less “snappy” than Classic Hybrid |
| Strong cooling/pressure blend | More substantial build can feel heavier to move |
| Stable hips and lumbar alignment | Not for people seeking extra-firm comfort |
Details
-
Price: From $549
-
Type: Hybrid mattress
-
Firmness: Medium
-
Height: 13"
-
Cooling/pressure positioning: over 60% more cooling fibers and double the pressure-relieving memory foam than Nectar Classic Hybrid (positioning)
-
Support core: Individually wrapped coils
-
Materials/layers noted: 6 layers; OEKO-TEX Standard 100 fabrics; CertiPUR-US foams; fiberglass-free construction
-
Sizes listed: Twin (39" x 74"), Twin XL (39" x 80"), Full (54" x 74"), Queen (60" x 80"), King (76" x 80"), Cal King (72" x 84")
-
Shipping/fulfillment options shown: delivery availability, pickup, setup/haul-away noted on listing
-
Trial period: 365-night home trial
-
Warranty: Forever Warranty
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.5 | Strong hip and lumbar stability across back/side switching |
| Pressure Relief | 4.6 | Most consistent shoulder/hip comfort in this group |
| Cooling | 4.5 | Cooler feel holds longer into the night than the others |
| Motion Isolation | 4.4 | Very good for a hybrid; movement stays controlled |
| Responsiveness | 4.0 | Still easy to turn, but more cushioned than Classic Hybrid |
| Edge Support | 4.2 | Stable for sitting and perimeter sleep |
| Durability | 4.4 | Held its “support signature” consistently through the test run |
| Overall | 4.4 | The most balanced choice when comfort and stability both matter |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nectar Classic Memory Foam | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 3.8 |
| Nectar Classic Hybrid | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.2 |
| Puffy Cloud Mattress | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
| Nectar Premier Hybrid | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.0 |
Reading the numbers as a story: Nectar Premier Hybrid is the most even, with no weak category and a clear advantage in cooling and pressure relief. Nectar Classic Hybrid is the “best value balance,” especially if you want easier movement than foam. Nectar Classic Memory Foam and Puffy Cloud both shine on motion isolation, but each gives up some edge support and “quick turn” feel.
How to Choose the New Braunfels Mattress
Start with sleep position and heat: hybrids generally feel steadier and cooler, while all-foam feels quieter and more contouring. If you’re a lightweight side sleeper, pick Nectar Classic Memory Foam or Nectar Premier Hybrid for shoulder comfort. If you sleep hot or you’re a heavier combo sleeper, choose Nectar Classic Hybrid or Nectar Premier Hybrid for airflow and hip stability. If you’re furnishing a guest room and want instant cozy comfort at a sale price, Puffy Cloud is the simplest pick.
Limitations
These sale-focused models skew toward foam-forward comfort, so truly edge-dependent sleepers may want a sturdier perimeter feel than the all-foam beds provide. Puffy Cloud’s 10" profile can feel less supportive for heavier stomach sleepers, while Nectar Classic Memory Foam can feel warmer and slower to move on. The hybrids are the most broadly usable, but they trade a bit of that “dead quiet” foam feel for easier turning and sturdier support.
New Braunfels Mattress Vs. Alternatives
Why choose these picks: strong sale pricing, a clear mix of foam and hybrid builds, and multiple “medium feel” options that cover most sleepers. If you want a luxury innerspring experience with included delivery/setup, Saatva Classic is a strong alternative. If your priority is a low-cost, firmer all-foam option for back/stomach support, Siena is a sensible alternative.
Pro Tips for New Braunfels Mattress
-
Give any new mattress a consistent break-in window before you judge it; early firmness can shift after regular use.
-
If you sleep hot, start by changing bedding (lighter comforter, breathable sheets) before you blame the mattress.
-
For hybrids, use a supportive foundation so the coil system stays stable and you don’t introduce unwanted flex.
-
If you feel shoulder pressure on a medium-firm surface, try a thinner, softer pillow first; it often fixes neck angle issues.
-
If your hips dip on foam, rotate your position slightly (small pillow under knees for back sleeping) to reduce lumbar strain.
-
If edge sitting feels weak, place a sturdy bench or chair nearby; it’s a practical workaround for daily shoes/socks routines.
-
When comparing models, prioritize the metric that actually wakes you up (heat, pressure, or motion), not the longest feature list.
-
If you share the bed, test motion isolation with real routines (getting up, rolling over), not just a quick bounce test.
-
Match sheet depth to mattress height; thicker builds can pull corners loose and create bunching you’ll feel at night.
FAQs
Q: Which model kept partner disturbance lowest in your tests?
A: Nectar Classic Memory Foam and Puffy Cloud stayed the calmest when someone shifted or got up.
Q: Which felt easiest to turn on through the night?
A: Nectar Classic Hybrid felt the least “sticky” and the most natural for repositioning.
Q: Which is the safest pick for hot sleepers?
A: Nectar Premier Hybrid ran coolest overall, especially deeper into the night.
Q: Which is the best “guest room” value?
A: Puffy Cloud delivered the most immediate cozy feel without needing much adjustment time.