Martha Stewart’s SleepComplete lineup focuses on straightforward, cooling-oriented bed-in-a-box builds—mostly all-foam options plus a firmer hybrid—aimed at sleepers who want predictable support, low motion disturbance, and an easy setup. In our testing, the best performers leaned medium-firm to firm for back support and edge stability, while the plusher model shined for pressure relief but asked for more patience with responsiveness.
Product overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SleepComplete Medium Support Dual-Action Green Tea Cooling Memory Foam Mattress | 4.0 | Balanced comfort; excellent motion isolation | Weak edge stability | Couples who want a calmer surface | $543.99 - $883.99 |
| SleepComplete Premium Medium-Firm Dual-Action Cooling Memory Foam Mattress in a Box | 4.1 | Stronger lumbar hold; stable feel | Firmer on shoulders/hips | Back sleepers and hybrid sleepers | $540.99 - $1,031.99 |
| SleepComplete Premium Medium-Plush Dual-Action Cooling Memory Foam Mattress in a Box | 3.9 | Best pressure relief; quiet surface | Can feel slower on turns | Side sleepers prioritizing cushioning | $702.99 - $993.99 |
| SleepComplete Firm Support Pocket Spring and Foam Hybrid Dual-Action Cooling Mattress | 4.3 | Best edge support; easiest to reposition | More bounce than all-foam | Heavier sleepers and people who like a firmer bed | $474.99 |
Testing team takeaways
Across four SleepComplete models, we found a clear trade-off: the all-foam beds dampened movement better, while the hybrid delivered the most dependable edges and the easiest turning. Marcus favored the firmer builds for hip support and cooler-feeling airflow. Jenna and Ethan consistently preferred the calmer motion of the foam options for shared sleep, but Ethan gravitated to the hybrid because it “lets me turn without thinking about it.” Dr. Walker’s feedback aligned with ours: zoning and edge structure mattered most for alignment and day-to-day usability.
Martha Stewart Mattress comparison chart
| Feature | Green Tea Cooling Memory Foam (Medium Support) | Premium Cooling Memory Foam (Medium-Firm) | Premium Cooling Memory Foam (Medium-Plush) | Firm Support Hybrid (Pocket Spring + Foam) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Memory foam | Memory foam | Memory foam | Hybrid |
| Thickness | 12 in | 12 in | 12 in | 12 in |
| Coil type | No coils | No coils | No coils | Pocket coils |
| Cooling components | Ventilated foam + cooling gel + green tea-infused foam | Ventilated foam + cooling gel | Cooling gel-infused layer | Cooling gel foam + coils |
| Cover | Removable jacquard (polyester) | Removable quilted jacquard (polyester) | Removable quilted jacquard (polyester) | Removable knit jacquard (polyester) |
| Edge support (design) | No edge support noted | - | - | Perimeter coil + foam encasement |
| Warranty | 5-year limited | 5-year limited | 5-year limited | 5-year limited |
| Best testing strength | Motion isolation + balanced comfort | Support + stability | Pressure relief | Edge support + responsiveness |
How we tested
We unboxed each mattress, allowed full expansion, and rotated through back, side, and brief stomach resting to evaluate Support and Pressure Relief. Cooling was judged by heat buildup over long, still periods and how quickly the surface felt neutral again. Motion Isolation was tested with shared sleep, entry/exit, and deliberate roll-and-stop movement. Responsiveness and Edge Support were evaluated during turning, sitting to put on shoes, and repeated edge perching. Durability was scored based on material behavior over weeks of use and early signs of softening.
Martha Stewart Mattress: our testing experience
SleepComplete Medium Support Dual-Action Green Tea Cooling Memory Foam Mattress
Our testing experience
The first thing I noticed was how even the surface felt—no sudden “dip,” just a steady, medium support that let my hips settle without letting them sink too far. Over long back-sleep stretches, my lower back stayed calmer than it does on softer foams, and Jenna immediately called it “quiet” when Ethan climbed in. Marcus liked the initial cool touch, but the real win was how stable it felt after midnight bathroom trips—no dramatic reshaping period. The edge was the weak point: sitting to tie shoes felt less supported than we wanted.
What we liked:
-
Low motion disturbance during shared sleep
-
Balanced contouring that didn’t collapse under hips
-
Comfortable “neutral” feel for mixed positions
Who it is best for:
-
Couples who wake easily from movement
-
Back-and-side combination sleepers
-
People who want a medium feel without a squishy top
Where it falls short:
-
Edge sitting feels less secure than a hybrid
-
Turning is comfortable, but not snappy
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent motion isolation | Limited edge support when sitting |
| Balanced, medium comfort | Less springy feel for repositioning |
| Cooling-focused foam stack | - |
Details
-
Price: $543.99 - $883.99
-
Thickness: 12 inches
-
Type: Memory foam (no coils)
-
Feel: Medium support
-
Available sizes: Twin, Full, Queen, King
-
Cover: Removable quilted recycled jacquard; cover material listed as polyester
-
Cooling: Ventilated memory foam + cooling gel; green tea-infused foam layer
-
Edge support: No edge support
-
Warranty: 5-year limited
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2 | Kept hips aligned without a deep sink. |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Stayed reasonably neutral for foam over long stretches. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3 | Smooth cushioning across shoulders and hips. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | Noticeably calm when a partner moves. |
| Responsiveness | 3.8 | Comfortable, but not quick like a coil bed. |
| Edge Support | 2.9 | Usable for sleep, weak for sitting/perching. |
| Durability | 4.1 | Held shape well over weeks with minimal softening. |
| Overall | 4.0 | Most even all-foam option for couples and combo sleepers. |
SleepComplete Premium Medium-Firm Dual-Action Cooling Memory Foam Mattress in a Box
Our testing experience
This one felt “organized” the moment I lay down—my hips didn’t wander, and my lower back stayed flatter through the night. I spent an evening reading propped up, and the mattress didn’t feel wobbly under me, which usually happens when foam is too soft in the transition layers. Marcus appreciated the lack of “hammocking,” especially when he rolled toward his stomach. Jenna liked how little it reacted to Ethan’s turns, but Ethan still described it as slightly “sticky” when he tried to change positions quickly. Dr. Walker’s note was simple: the firmer platform made alignment easier to maintain for back sleepers.
What we liked:
-
Stronger midsection stability for back sleeping
-
Very low partner disturbance
-
Consistent feel from edge-to-center when lying down
Who it is best for:
-
Back sleepers wanting a firmer, flatter feel
-
Combo sleepers who prioritize lumbar steadiness
-
Couples who want motion control without coils
Where it falls short:
-
Less forgiving for pressure points than the plusher model
-
Not as lively for frequent repositioning
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Stable, supportive feel | Firmer on shoulders/hips for side sleep |
| Excellent motion isolation | Less responsive than a hybrid |
| Cooling-focused foam design | - |
Details
-
Price: $540.99 - $1,031.99
-
Thickness: 12 inches
-
Type: Memory foam (no coils)
-
Feel: Medium firm
-
Available sizes: Twin, Full, Queen, King
-
Cover: Removable quilted jacquard with CoolWeave technology; cover material listed as polyester
-
Cooling: Ventilated memory foam + cooling gel layer(s)
-
Warranty: 5-year limited
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.5 | Best all-foam option for lumbar steadiness. |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Managed heat better than typical memory foam. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.8 | Good, but firmer sleepers will feel more pushback. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.5 | Partner movement stayed muted. |
| Responsiveness | 3.9 | Easier than very slow foam, still not springy. |
| Edge Support | 3.2 | Acceptable for sleep near edge, not a sitting bed. |
| Durability | 4.2 | Stayed consistent with limited early softening. |
| Overall | 4.1 | The “support-first” foam model in the lineup. |
SleepComplete Premium Medium-Plush Dual-Action Cooling Memory Foam Mattress in a Box
Our testing experience
This was the one that felt the most immediately comforting on my side—my shoulder sank in without that sharp pressure you get when the surface is too firm. I could tell it was built to cushion joints first, and Jenna liked it for that “soft landing” feeling when she got into bed. Marcus, though, started on his side and rolled forward; by morning he said his hips felt like they sat a little deeper than he prefers. Ethan liked the quiet surface but wanted faster pushback when he changed positions. Dr. Walker’s feedback matched the experience: excellent pressure management, but heavier sleepers should pay attention to hip depth.
What we liked:
-
Best pressure relief for side sleeping
-
Very quiet, low-motion surface
-
Comfort-forward top that feels welcoming
Who it is best for:
-
Side sleepers who want more cushioning
-
Couples prioritizing motion isolation
-
Guest rooms where “soft comfort” matters
Where it falls short:
-
Heavier sleepers may want a firmer platform
-
Slower response when you change positions often
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong pressure relief | Can feel slower to reposition |
| Excellent motion isolation | Less supportive for heavier bodies |
| Plush, comfortable surface | - |
Details
-
Price: $702.99 - $993.99
-
Thickness: 12 inches
-
Type: Memory foam (no coils)
-
Feel: Medium-plush; mattress feel listed as firm
-
Available sizes: Twin, Full, Queen, King
-
Cover: Removable quilted jacquard with CoolWeave technology; cover material listed as polyester
-
Foam: Memory foam + cooling gel-infused foam + high density support foam
-
Warranty: 5-year limited
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.9 | Comfortable, but less “holding” under heavier hips. |
| Cooling | 3.9 | Cooling layer helps; still a plush all-foam feel. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.6 | Best cushioning at shoulders and outer hips. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.7 | Most disturbance-damping model we tested. |
| Responsiveness | 3.6 | Noticeably slower when changing positions. |
| Edge Support | 3.0 | Fine for sleep near edge; sitting is less stable. |
| Durability | 3.9 | Early softening risk is higher with plush builds. |
| Overall | 3.9 | The pressure-relief pick, with trade-offs in speed and support. |
SleepComplete Firm Support Pocket Spring and Foam Hybrid Dual-Action Cooling Mattress
Our testing experience
The hybrid was the easiest to live with day-to-day. When I sat on the edge to put on socks, it held me up instead of folding, and Marcus immediately preferred it for morning “edge sitting” and for stomach-leaning sleep. Overnight, the zoning and firmer perimeter made the bed feel more structured—less sink, more pushback. Jenna felt more movement compared with the foam models when Ethan rolled, but Ethan was happiest here because the surface didn’t fight him when he turned. Dr. Walker emphasized that this kind of edge structure and coil support tends to make alignment more repeatable, especially for heavier bodies.
What we liked:
-
Best edge support and most stable perimeter
-
Easiest repositioning of the four
-
Strong, firmer support for back/stomach sleep
Who it is best for:
-
Heavier sleepers who need a firmer platform
-
People who sit on the edge often
-
Restless sleepers who turn frequently
Where it falls short:
-
More motion feedback than all-foam models
-
Pressure relief is less “pillowy” than the plush foam
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong edge support | More bounce and motion feedback |
| Responsive turning | Firmer feel can challenge side-sleep pressure |
| Zoning + coil stability | - |
Details
-
Price: $474.99
-
Thickness: 12 inches
-
Type: Hybrid (pocket coils + foam)
-
Feel: Firm
-
Available sizes: Twin, Full, Queen, King
-
Cover: Removable jacquard with CoolWeave technology; cover material listed as polyester
-
Construction highlights: Cooling gel memory foam + support foam layers; pocket coils with 5-way zoning; perimeter coil + foam encasement
-
Fiberglass: No
-
Warranty: 5-year limited
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.7 | Most “held” and structured feel under hips and torso. |
| Cooling | 4.5 | Coils + cooling layer felt most breathable overnight. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.7 | Firmer surface gives less shoulder/hip sink. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Good for a hybrid, still more feedback than foam. |
| Responsiveness | 4.4 | Easiest turning and repositioning. |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | Clear best-in-class edge stability in this set. |
| Durability | 4.3 | Coil-and-foam build felt the most resistant to sagging. |
| Overall | 4.3 | The performance leader if you want firmness, edges, and easy movement. |
Compare performance scores of these mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green Tea Cooling Memory Foam (Medium Support) | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 3.8 |
| Premium Cooling Memory Foam (Medium-Firm) | 4.1 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 3.9 |
| Premium Cooling Memory Foam (Medium-Plush) | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 3.6 |
| Firm Support Hybrid (Pocket Spring + Foam) | 4.3 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.4 |
The most evenly balanced option is the Green Tea Cooling Memory Foam, with strong pressure relief and motion isolation but a clear edge weakness. The Firm Support Hybrid stands out for support, cooling, responsiveness, and edge structure, while giving up some motion dampening. The Medium-Firm all-foam model is the alignment-first pick, and the Medium-Plush model is the pressure-relief specialist with the most noticeable trade-offs in speed and support.
How to choose the Martha Stewart Mattress?
Start with sleep position and how often you move: firmer builds favor back/stomach support, while plusher foams favor side-sleep comfort. If you share a bed and wake easily, prioritize motion isolation; if you sit on the edge often, prioritize edge structure. For lightweight side sleepers, choose the Premium Medium-Plush Cooling Memory Foam. For average-weight back sleepers, pick the Premium Medium-Firm Cooling Memory Foam. For hot sleepers or heavier couples who want stability, choose the Firm Support Hybrid.
Limitations
These models skew toward a firm-to-medium-firm “organized” feel, so ultra-soft mattress fans may struggle to find a true sink-in plush sensation. The all-foam options are quieter for couples but are less dependable on the edge for sitting. The hybrid is the most usable day-to-day, yet it transmits more movement than the foam beds and can feel too firm for sensitive shoulders and outer hips. If you rotate positions frequently, the slower foam response can feel restrictive.
Martha Stewart Mattress vs alternatives
Why choose these models
-
Clear firmness ladder from plush-leaning foam to firm hybrid
-
Cooling-oriented materials and breathable covers
-
Strong motion control in the all-foam models
-
Hybrid option offers standout edge stability and easy turning
Alternatives to consider
-
Saatva Classic for shoppers who want a more traditional, hotel-like coil feel
-
Helix Midnight for a mainstream balance of contouring and support
-
Nectar for a softer, foam-forward feel and strong motion isolation
Pro tips for Martha Stewart Mattress
-
Give the mattress time to fully expand before judging feel and support.
-
If you’re an edge sitter, prioritize the hybrid over the all-foam options.
-
For side sleeping on firmer models, use a thicker pillow to keep neck alignment neutral.
-
If you run hot, pair with breathable sheets and avoid thick, non-breathable mattress protectors.
-
Rotate the mattress periodically to keep wear more even.
-
For restless sleepers, favor the hybrid for easier turning and less “stuck” sensation.
-
If you share a bed, test motion by having one person enter/exit while the other lies still.
-
For lower-back tightness, compare how your hips settle on medium-firm versus firm support.
-
If you use an adjustable base, confirm stability and edge feel in raised positions.
FAQs
Q: Which model best minimizes partner movement?
A: The Premium Medium-Plush Cooling Memory Foam dampened movement the most.
Q: Which model feels easiest to turn on?
A: The Firm Support Hybrid, thanks to coil support and quicker rebound.
Q: Which model is best for edge sitting?
A: The Firm Support Hybrid; the all-foam models felt less stable at the edge.
