Martha Stewart’s SleepComplete lineup keeps things simple: cooling-leaning beds-in-a-box with three all-foam options and one firmer hybrid. In our hands-on testing, the medium-firm foam and the hybrid felt the most supportive (especially under the hips and near the edge), while the medium-plush foam was the best at easing pressure points but felt slower when you changed positions. For more brand and model comparisons, see All Mattress Reviews.
Table of Contents
- Product overview
- Testing team takeaways
- SleepComplete comparison chart
- How we tested these mattresses
- Martha Stewart Mattress: our testing experience
- Performance score comparison
- How to choose a Martha Stewart SleepComplete mattress
- Limitations
- Martha Stewart Mattress vs alternatives
- Pro tips for the SleepComplete lineup
- FAQs
Product overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SleepComplete Medium Support Dual-Action Green Tea Cooling Memory Foam Mattress | 4.0 | Balanced comfort; excellent motion isolation | Weak edge stability | Couples who want a calmer surface | Varies |
| SleepComplete Premium Medium-Firm Dual-Action Cooling Memory Foam Mattress in a Box | 4.1 | Stronger lumbar hold; stable feel | Firmer on shoulders/hips | Back sleepers and combination sleepers | Varies |
| SleepComplete Premium Medium-Plush Dual-Action Cooling Memory Foam Mattress in a Box | 3.9 | Best pressure relief; quiet surface | Can feel slower on turns | Side sleepers prioritizing cushioning | Varies |
| SleepComplete Firm Support Pocket Spring and Foam Hybrid Dual-Action Cooling Mattress | 4.3 | Best edge support; easiest to reposition | More bounce than all-foam | Heavier sleepers and people who like a firmer bed | Varies |
Testing team takeaways
In hands-on testing, our team saw the same trade-off in every model: the all-foam beds muted partner movement better, while the hybrid felt sturdier at the edge and easier to move on. Marcus preferred the firmer options for hip support and airflow. Jenna and Ethan liked the quieter foam feel for shared sleep, though Ethan still leaned hybrid for quicker repositioning. Dr. Walker’s notes matched what we felt—zoning and edge structure mattered most for alignment.
SleepComplete comparison chart
| Feature | Green Tea Foam (Medium) | Premium Foam (Medium-Firm) | Premium Foam (Medium-Plush) | Firm Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Memory foam | Memory foam | Memory foam | Hybrid |
| Thickness | 12 in | 12 in | 12 in | 12 in |
| Coil type | No coils | No coils | No coils | Pocket coils |
| Cooling components | Ventilated foam + cooling gel + green tea foam | Ventilated foam + cooling gel | Cooling gel foam | Cooling gel foam + coils |
| Cover | Removable quilted recycled jacquard (polyester) | Removable quilted jacquard (polyester) | Removable quilted jacquard (polyester) | Removable knit jacquard (polyester) |
| Edge support (design) | No edge support noted | - | - | Perimeter coil + foam encasement |
| Warranty | 5-year limited | 5-year limited | 5-year limited | 5-year limited |
| Best testing strength | Motion isolation + balanced comfort | Support + stability | Pressure relief | Edge support + responsiveness |
How we tested these mattresses
We unboxed each mattress, let it fully expand, and rotated through back, side, and brief stomach sessions. We tracked heat buildup and recovery for cooling, checked motion isolation with partner movement and getting in and out, and evaluated responsiveness with repeated turning. Edge support was tested by sitting and perching along the perimeter, and durability scores reflect changes we observed over weeks of use.
Martha Stewart Mattress: our testing experience
SleepComplete Medium Support Dual-Action Green Tea Cooling Memory Foam Mattress
Our testing experience

In our tests, this was the most even-feeling of the all-foam beds. There wasn’t a sudden dip—my hips settled gently, then stopped, which kept my lower back from feeling strained on longer back-sleep stretches. Jenna called it a quiet surface the moment Ethan climbed in, and we consistently saw very low motion transfer. The trade-off showed up at the perimeter: sitting to tie shoes felt less secure than we’d want for frequent edge use.
What we liked:
-
Very low motion transfer for shared sleep
-
Even contouring that supports the hips
-
Middle-of-the-road feel for mixed positions
Who it is best for:
-
Couples who wake up easily from movement
-
Back-and-side combination sleepers
-
Shoppers who want medium support without a puffy top
Where it falls short:
-
Edge sitting feels less secure than a hybrid
-
Comfortable to turn on, but not especially quick

Details
-
Thickness: 12 inches
-
Feel: Medium support
-
Cover: Removable quilted recycled jacquard (polyester)
-
Cooling: Ventilated memory foam + cooling gel; green tea-infused foam layer
-
Edge support: No dedicated edge system
-
Warranty: 5-year limited

Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2 | Kept hips aligned without a deep sink. |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Stayed reasonably neutral for foam over long stretches. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3 | Smooth cushioning across shoulders and hips. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | Noticeably calm when a partner moves. |
| Responsiveness | 3.8 | Comfortable, but not quick like a coil bed. |
| Edge Support | 2.9 | Usable for sleep, weak for sitting/perching. |
| Durability | 4.1 | Held shape well over weeks with minimal softening. |
| Overall | 4.0 | Most even all-foam option for couples and combo sleepers. |
SleepComplete Premium Medium-Firm Dual-Action Cooling Memory Foam Mattress in a Box
Our testing experience

This model felt more structured right away. My hips stayed level and my lower back didn’t drift into a sag, even when I spent time reading propped up. In our testing, it delivered the strongest midsection support of the foam options, and partner movement stayed very muted. The downside is that the firmer top can feel less forgiving at the shoulder and outer hip for side sleepers, and it doesn’t have the quick rebound you get from coils.
What we liked:
-
Strong midsection stability for back sleep
-
Muted partner disturbance
-
Consistent feel across the surface when lying down
Who it is best for:
-
Back sleepers who want a flatter, firmer feel
-
Combination sleepers who prioritize lumbar steadiness
-
Couples who prefer an all-foam surface
Where it falls short:
-
Can feel firm at shoulders/hips for side sleep
-
Not as lively for frequent repositioning

Details
-
Thickness: 12 inches
-
Feel: Medium firm
-
Cover: Removable quilted jacquard with CoolWeave (polyester)
-
Cooling: Ventilated memory foam + cooling gel layer(s)
-
Warranty: 5-year limited

Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.5 | Best all-foam option for lumbar steadiness. |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Managed heat better than typical memory foam. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.8 | Good, but firmer sleepers will feel more pushback. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.5 | Partner movement stayed muted. |
| Responsiveness | 3.9 | Easier than very slow foam, still not springy. |
| Edge Support | 3.2 | Acceptable for sleep near edge, not a sitting bed. |
| Durability | 4.2 | Stayed consistent with limited early softening. |
| Overall | 4.1 | The “support-first” foam model in the lineup. |
SleepComplete Premium Medium-Plush Dual-Action Cooling Memory Foam Mattress in a Box
Our testing experience

This is the comfort-first pick. On my side, my shoulder sank in smoothly without the sharp pressure that shows up on firmer foams, and the surface stayed very quiet when a partner moved. The trade-offs were clear in testing: it’s slower to push back when you turn, and heavier bodies can sink deeper through the hips than they may like—especially if they start on the side and drift toward the stomach.
What we liked:
-
Best pressure relief for side sleeping
-
Very quiet, low-motion surface
-
Comfort-forward top that feels welcoming
Who it is best for:
-
Side sleepers who want more cushioning
-
Couples prioritizing motion isolation
-
Guest rooms where softer comfort matters
Where it falls short:
-
Heavier sleepers may prefer a firmer platform
-
Slower response when you change positions often

Details
-
Thickness: 12 inches
-
Feel: Medium-plush (some retailer specs categorize it as ‘firm’)
-
Cover: Removable quilted jacquard with CoolWeave (polyester)
-
Foam: Memory foam + cooling gel-infused foam + high density support foam
-
Warranty: 5-year limited

Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.9 | Comfortable, but less “holding” under heavier hips. |
| Cooling | 3.9 | Cooling layer helps; still a plush all-foam feel. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.6 | Best cushioning at shoulders and outer hips. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.7 | Most disturbance-damping model we tested. |
| Responsiveness | 3.6 | Noticeably slower when changing positions. |
| Edge Support | 3.0 | Fine for sleep near edge; sitting is less stable. |
| Durability | 3.9 | Early softening risk is higher with plush builds. |
| Overall | 3.9 | The pressure-relief pick, with trade-offs in speed and support. |
SleepComplete Firm Support Pocket Spring and Foam Hybrid Dual-Action Cooling Mattress
Our testing experience

This hybrid was the easiest to live with day to day. Edge sitting felt noticeably sturdier, and the surface had quicker pushback when we rolled or got up—our testers consistently found it the simplest to reposition on. Compared with the all-foam models, it let through more movement when a partner turned, and the firmer feel can leave side sleepers wanting more cushioning at the shoulder and hip.
What we liked:
-
Best edge support and most stable perimeter
-
Easiest repositioning of the four
-
Strong support for back and stomach sleep
Who it is best for:
-
Heavier sleepers who want a firmer platform
-
People who sit on the edge often
-
Restless sleepers who change positions frequently
Where it falls short:
-
More bounce and motion feedback than all-foam models
-
Firmer feel can challenge side-sleep pressure points

Details
-
Thickness: 12 inches
-
Feel: Firm
-
Cover: Removable CoolWeave jacquard cover (polyester)
-
Construction highlights: Cooling gel memory foam + support foam layers; pocket coils with 5-way zoning; perimeter coil + foam encasement
-
Warranty: 5-year limited

Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.7 | Most “held” and structured feel under hips and torso. |
| Cooling | 4.5 | Coils + cooling layer felt most breathable overnight. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.7 | Firmer surface gives less shoulder/hip sink. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Good for a hybrid, still more feedback than foam. |
| Responsiveness | 4.4 | Easiest turning and repositioning. |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | Clear best-in-class edge stability in this set. |
| Durability | 4.3 | Coil-and-foam build felt the most resistant to sagging. |
| Overall | 4.3 | The performance leader if you want firmness, edges, and easy movement. |
Performance score comparison
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green Tea Cooling Memory Foam (Medium Support) | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 4.1 | 3.8 |
| Premium Cooling Memory Foam (Medium-Firm) | 4.1 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 3.9 |
| Premium Cooling Memory Foam (Medium-Plush) | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 3.6 |
| Firm Support Hybrid (Pocket Spring + Foam) | 4.3 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.4 |
The most evenly balanced option is the Green Tea Cooling Memory Foam, with strong pressure relief and motion isolation but a clear edge weakness. The Firm Support Hybrid stands out for support, cooling, responsiveness, and edge structure, while giving up some motion dampening. The Medium-Firm all-foam model is the alignment-first pick, and the Medium-Plush model is the pressure-relief specialist with the most noticeable trade-offs in speed and support.
How to choose a Martha Stewart SleepComplete mattress
Start with your sleep position (see How to Choose a Mattress for a deeper walkthrough) and how much you move at night. Firmer builds usually keep back and stomach sleepers better aligned, while plusher foams feel kinder on shoulders and hips for side sleep. If you share a bed, prioritize motion isolation ; if you sit or sleep near the edge, prioritize edge support . In our testing, lightweight side sleepers leaned Premium Medium-Plush, average-weight back sleepers leaned Premium Medium-Firm, and heavier sleepers did best on the Firm Support Hybrid.
Limitations
Most of this lineup sits medium-firm to firm, so deep-plush fans may want a softer option. The all-foam models are quieter for couples but compress more at the edge. The hybrid is easiest to move on and the most supportive at the perimeter, but it’s bouncier and can feel too firm for sensitive shoulders and hips.
Martha Stewart Mattress vs alternatives
Why choose these models
-
Clear firmness ladder from plush-leaning foam to firm hybrid
-
Cooling-oriented materials and breathable covers
-
Strong motion control in the all-foam models
-
Hybrid option offers standout edge stability and easy turning
Alternatives to consider
-
Saatva Classic for shoppers who want a more traditional, hotel-like coil feel
-
Helix Midnight for a mainstream balance of contouring and support
-
Nectar for a softer, foam-forward feel and strong motion isolation
Pro tips for the SleepComplete lineup
-
Let it fully expand before judging feel and support.
-
If you sit at the edge, prioritize the hybrid.
-
For side sleep on firmer models, use a thicker pillow.
-
If you run hot, use breathable sheets and skip thick protectors.
-
Rotate the mattress periodically for more even wear.
-
With an adjustable base, recheck stability when raised.
FAQs
Which model best minimizes partner movement?
In our tests, the Premium Medium-Plush Cooling Memory Foam dampened partner movement the most.
Which model feels easiest to turn on?
The Firm Support Hybrid, thanks to coil support and quicker rebound.
Which model is best for edge sitting?
The Firm Support Hybrid; the all-foam models felt less stable at the edge.