Jerome’s mattress lineup runs mostly firm and focuses on value-forward hybrids, plus one thinner all-foam option. I narrowed it to four core models and scored each one for support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability. If you want steady alignment and a more “on-top” feel, this lineup makes sense. If you’re very light, sleep mostly on your side, or want a plush, sink-in surface, you may be happier in a softer comfort level.
Table of Contents
- Which Jerome’s mattresses did we test?
- What stood out in testing?
- Jerome’s mattresses: comparison chart
- How we tested Jerome’s mattresses
- Jerome’s mattresses: our testing experience
- Side-by-side performance scores
- How to choose a Jerome’s mattress
- Limitations to know before you buy
- Jerome’s mattresses vs. alternatives
- Practical tips for Jerome’s mattress owners
- FAQs
Which Jerome’s mattresses did we test?
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome's GridTek Mattress | 4.4 | Secure edge, breathable feel | Firm surface can feel very on-top | Back and combo sleepers who want steady support |
| Pro Hybrid Mattress | 4.2 | Balanced support with gentle contouring | Some bounce compared with all-foam | Most sleepers, especially combo sleepers |
| Classics 2.0 Mattress | 4.0 | No-frills support for the price | Less cushioning for shoulders and hips | Back sleepers and guest rooms |
| Jerome's-gel Pedic 5.0 Mattress | 3.8 | Excellent motion isolation (quiet feel) | Softer edge, warmer feel | Solo sleepers and smaller rooms |
What stood out in testing?
GridTek felt the most dialed-in for support, especially through the hips, and it had the most dependable edge. Pro Hybrid was the easiest all-arounder in our group—it gave Mia a bit more shoulder comfort without losing alignment. Classics 2.0 kept things simple: firm, steady, and predictable, but with less cushioning. Jerome’s-gel Pedic 5.0 was the quietest and best at muting movement, but its edge felt softer and it held onto more warmth during long stretches.
Jerome’s mattresses: comparison chart
| Comparison Item | Jerome's GridTek Mattress | Pro Hybrid Mattress | Classics 2.0 Mattress | Jerome's-gel Pedic 5.0 Mattress |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feel listed on product page | Firm | Firm | Firm | Firm |
| Thickness (queen shown) | 14" | 12" | 10" | 8" |
| Construction cues | Grid layer + pocketed coils | Hybrid (listed) | Pocketed coils + foam layers | Foam layers listed |
| Coil type | Pocketed springs | Pocketed coils | Pocketed coils | - |
| Noted foams/materials | GridTek layer, copper memory foam, transition foam | Copper infused memory foam, ZeroG foam, Jerome’s-gel memory foam, orthopedic base foam | Gel memory foam, quilt foam, transition foam | Gel memory foam, base foam |
| Cooling listed | Yes | Yes | Cooling described | - |
| Edge system called out | Dream Edge perimeter | - | Dream Edge support base | - |
| Adjustable base compatible | Yes | Yes | - | - |
| Warranty listed | 25-year non-prorated | 20-year non-prorated | 20-year non-prorated | 20-year non-prorated |
| My support impression | Very strong, stable | Strong, slightly more give | Strong, firmer ride | Moderate, more compression |
| My motion isolation impression | Good for a coil build | Good | Fair-to-good | Excellent |
| My cooling impression | Very good airflow feel | Good | Fair-to-good | Fair |
How we tested Jerome’s mattresses
We put each mattress through the same routine: full-night sleep, a 30-minute reading session before bed, repeated position changes, and morning sit-and-stand tests at the edge. Scores for support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability come directly from how the beds felt during that routine—especially whether hips stayed level, whether heat built after about an hour, and how much movement carried across the surface.
Jerome’s mattresses: our testing experience
Jerome's GridTek Mattress

Our Testing Experience
The GridTek felt buoyant right away. Instead of letting my hips settle deep, it pushed back and kept my midsection level. On my back, my lower back stayed relaxed even after desk-heavy days.
On my side, it maintained alignment, but it didn’t offer a deep shoulder sink—Mia noticed that the most and preferred a lower-loft pillow to keep her neck neutral. Marcus liked how planted the perimeter felt when he sat to tie shoes and when he slept close to the edge.
What we liked
-
Buoyant, stable support that kept hips and lumbar area level
-
Stayed breathable during long, still stretches
-
Secure edge for sitting and sleeping near the perimeter
Who it is best for
-
Back and combo sleepers who like a firm, on-top feel
-
Heavier sleepers who want to avoid a hammocking sensation
-
Anyone who wants a steadier edge for daily in-and-out use
Where it falls short
-
Lightweight side sleepers who need more shoulder give
-
Shoppers who want a noticeably plush top layer
Listed highlights include a GridTek layer over pocketed springs, copper memory foam, a 14" profile, Dream Edge support, and a 25-year non-prorated warranty.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong, steady support under hips and lower back | Firm surface can feel too “upright” for light side sleepers |
| Noticeably secure edge feel | Less plush pressure relief than softer builds |
| Breathable feel over longer sessions | - |
Details
-
Firmness: Firm
-
Size shown: Queen
-
Thickness: 14"
-
Type: Tight top
-
Materials noted: Dream Ice cover, GridTek layer, copper memory foam, transition foam, pocketed springs
-
Cooling listed: Yes
-
Edge system noted: Dream Edge
-
Adjustable base compatible: Yes
-
Recommended rotation: Head to foot
-
Warranty: 25-year non-prorated
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.6 | Consistently held my hips level; Marcus avoided “sag” feel |
| Cooling | 4.5 | Breathable surface feel, less heat buildup during long holds |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3 | Good contouring, but the firm top limited Mia’s shoulder sink |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Better than many coil beds, still some bounce across the surface |
| Responsiveness | 4.4 | Easy position changes without feeling stuck |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | Confident sitting edge and stable sleep near perimeter |
| Durability | 4.5 | Sturdy construction and the longer warranty point to good long-term stability |
| Overall | 4.4 | Most complete “support-first” option in the set |
Pro Hybrid Mattress

Our Testing Experience
Pro Hybrid was the “middle lane” feel. It still supported my back, but the surface had more initial give than GridTek, which made side-starts easier.
Switching from side to back felt smooth and low-effort. Carlos paid most attention to alignment and liked the way the top layers eased you in before the support caught you. Marcus thought it was the easiest mattress to live with night after night, even if the sitting edge didn’t feel quite as braced as GridTek.
What we liked
-
Balanced mix of support and cushioning across positions
-
Cooling stayed consistent through an all-night session
-
Easy, low-resistance turns
Who it is best for
-
Combination sleepers who switch positions
-
Back sleepers who still want a touch of surface cushioning
-
Couples who want solid motion control without an all-foam feel
Where it falls short
-
Shoppers who want a deep, plush cradle
-
People who sit on the edge a lot and want the stiffest perimeter
Listed as a 12" hybrid with pocketed coils, firm comfort, and a 20-year non-prorated warranty.

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Well-balanced comfort and support | Edge support not as confidence-inspiring as GridTek |
| Good cooling feel for a hybrid build | Still some bounce compared with all-foam |
| Easy to change positions | - |
Details
-
Firmness: Firm
-
Size shown: Queen
-
Thickness: 12"
-
Mattress type listed: Hybrid
-
Materials noted: copper infused memory foam, ZeroG foam, Jerome’s-gel memory foam, orthopedic base foam; pocketed coils
-
Cooling listed: Yes
-
Adjustable base compatible: Yes
-
Cover: Dream Cool fabric
-
Warranty: 20-year non-prorated
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4 | Held alignment well across positions; Carlos stayed level |
| Cooling | 4.3 | Stayed comfortable through longer stretches without notable heat spike |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Enough give for side starts; less sharp pressure than Classics |
| Motion Isolation | 4.1 | Solid dampening for a coil build, though not silent-flat |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Turns were smooth and low-effort |
| Edge Support | 4.2 | Stable for sleep near edge; sitting edge less firm than GridTek |
| Durability | 4.2 | Build quality and listed certifications suggest solid long-term value |
| Overall | 4.2 | Best “balanced” pick if you want one mattress to do most things well |
Classics 2.0 Mattress

Our Testing Experience
Classics 2.0 is the no-frills option: firm, stable, and consistent from night to night. On my back, it kept my hips level quickly, and Marcus liked the predictable support.
The trade-off showed up on longer side stretches—Mia felt more pressure at the shoulder and outer hip than she did on Pro Hybrid. For a guest room, this is a safe “firm and simple” choice, as long as you’re not shopping for a plush feel.
What we liked
-
Firm, predictable surface with dependable support
-
Stable feel when sitting and standing up
-
Straightforward build that feels value-focused
Who it is best for
-
Back sleepers who prefer a firmer ride
-
Heavier sleepers who don’t want much sink
-
Guest rooms where broad-appeal firmness matters
Where it falls short
-
Side sleepers who need more pressure relief
-
Anyone who wants a cushier top layer
Listed specs include gel memory foam over pocketed coils, a Dream Edge support base, a 10" profile, and a 20-year non-prorated warranty.

Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Firm, stable support that feels consistent | Less pressure relief for shoulders and hips |
| Reinforced perimeter feel | Not as “specialized” as GridTek or Pro Hybrid |
| Good value-oriented build cues | - |

Details
-
Firmness: Firm
-
Size shown: Queen
-
Thickness: 10"
-
Construction notes: gel memory foam + pocketed coils
-
Cover notes: stretch knit fabric and quilt layer
-
Back support listed: Dream Zone
-
Support base listed: Dream Edge
-
Warranty: 20-year non-prorated
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2 | Firm stability helped keep hips level, especially for Marcus |
| Cooling | 4.0 | No major heat spikes, but less airy than GridTek |
| Pressure Relief | 3.9 | Noticeable pressure for Mia during long side holds |
| Motion Isolation | 3.8 | More vibration across the surface than Pro Hybrid |
| Responsiveness | 4.0 | Easy enough to turn, not sticky |
| Edge Support | 4.1 | Perimeter felt supportive for daily use |
| Durability | 4.0 | Solid build cues with warranty coverage |
| Overall | 4.0 | Reliable and firm, with fewer “comfort luxuries” than the top two |
Jerome's-gel Pedic 5.0 Mattress

Our Testing Experience
Jerome’s-gel Pedic 5.0 was the simplest feel to describe: foam compresses under you and the bed stays quiet. It was the calmest surface for reading in bed and did the best job preventing movement from traveling.
The downsides were clear, too. The edge felt softer when I sat to lace up shoes, and after longer stretches on my back, it held onto more warmth than the hybrid models. Mia also noticed it took a little more effort to reposition compared with the springier beds.
What we liked
-
Best motion isolation and the quietest surface
-
Simple, no-bounce feel that works well solo
-
Firm foam support that stayed consistent
Who it is best for
-
Motion-sensitive sleepers
-
Solo sleepers who want a quieter foam feel
-
Smaller rooms where an 8" profile fits better
Where it falls short
-
People who rely on a sturdy sitting edge
-
Hot sleepers who want maximum airflow
Jerome’s lists an 8" queen profile with gel memory foam and orthopedic base foam, plus a 20-year non-prorated warranty.
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Best motion isolation of the four | Edge support felt weaker than coil builds |
| Quiet, low-bounce surface | More heat retention over long sessions |
| Straightforward foam feel | Less responsive when switching positions |
Details
-
Firmness: Firm
-
Size shown: Queen
-
Thickness: 8"
-
Foams noted: Jerome’s-gel memory foam, orthopedic base foam
-
Cover: Jerome’s 8-way stretch fabric
-
Warranty: 20-year non-prorated
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.9 | Adequate support, but less “lift” than the hybrids |
| Cooling | 3.6 | More heat retention during longer holds |
| Pressure Relief | 3.7 | Comfortable initially; less adaptive than Pro Hybrid for side sleep |
| Motion Isolation | 4.5 | Quietest surface with the least movement transfer |
| Responsiveness | 3.5 | Slightly more effort to turn compared with hybrids |
| Edge Support | 3.6 | Sitting edge and perimeter felt less secure |
| Durability | 3.8 | Solid warranty, but thinner profile reduced confidence for heavier users |
| Overall | 3.8 | Best for motion control, weaker on edge and cooling |
Side-by-side performance scores
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jerome's GridTek Mattress | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Pro Hybrid Mattress | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.2 |
| Classics 2.0 Mattress | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| Jerome's-gel Pedic 5.0 Mattress | 3.8 | 3.9 | 3.7 | 3.6 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 3.5 |
If you want the most even performance across categories, Pro Hybrid is the safe bet. GridTek leads on stability, edge security, and the most breathable feel. Classics 2.0 is the firm value option—steady support with less cushioning. Jerome’s-gel Pedic 5.0 is the motion-isolation pick, but it gives up ground on edge support and cooling.
How to choose a Jerome’s mattress
Start with your main sleep position and how firm you want the top to feel. If you want the most stable surface (or you’re heavier), GridTek is the safest bet. If you switch positions and want a smoother blend of cushioning and support, go with Pro Hybrid. If you’re shopping on value and prefer a simple, firm ride, Classics 2.0 fits the brief. If you’re sensitive to movement and want a quieter surface, Jerome’s-gel Pedic 5.0 does that best.
Limitations to know before you buy
The models we tested lean firm overall, so lightweight side sleepers may struggle to get enough shoulder give—especially on GridTek and Classics 2.0. The quieter, lower-bounce feel comes most clearly from the all-foam Jerome’s-gel Pedic 5.0, but that trade-off shows up in softer edges and more heat retention during long holds. If you need a truly plush top, you’ll likely want a different comfort tier than the models covered here.
Jerome’s mattresses vs. alternatives
These Jerome’s models make the most sense if you want firmer support, straightforward builds, and hybrids that prioritize stability over a plush sink. If you’d rather have a medium-feel hybrid tuned for side-sleeper pressure relief and lumbar zoning, consider the Helix Midnight Luxe. If you want an organic latex-and-coil hybrid with a naturally cooler, springier feel, Avocado’s Organic 11" Hybrid is another option.
Practical tips for Jerome’s mattress owners
-
Give yourself about two weeks before you judge firmness; most people feel the adjustment first in the shoulders and hips.
-
If you’re a side sleeper on a firmer model, try a lower-loft pillow to reduce neck tilt.
-
On softer edges, sit closer to the center before you fully load the corner—especially on thinner foam beds.
-
If you’re on the all-foam option and sleep warm, keep the room cooler or use more breathable bedding.
-
Use a mattress protector early to help prevent spills from changing the feel of the comfort layer over time.
-
If the manufacturer recommends it, rotate head-to-foot on a consistent schedule (GridTek, in particular).
-
For couples, motion isolation tends to matter first, then edge support; those two drive most nightly disturbances.
-
If a firm surface creates hip pressure, a thin, responsive topper is usually better than a thick plush pad that can reduce support.
-
If you use an adjustable base, double-check compatibility on the models that list it.