Your cart

Your cart is empty

We receive free products to review and participate in affiliate programs, where we are compensated for items purchased through links from our site. See our disclosure page for more information.

Jerome's Mattress Reviews (2026)

Jerome’s mattress lineup runs mostly firm and focuses on value-forward hybrids, plus one thinner all-foam option. I narrowed it to four core models and scored each one for support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability. If you want steady alignment and a more “on-top” feel, this lineup makes sense. If you’re very light, sleep mostly on your side, or want a plush, sink-in surface, you may be happier in a softer comfort level.

Which Jerome’s mattresses did we test?

Mattress Overall Score Pros Cons Ideal For
Jerome's GridTek Mattress 4.4 Secure edge, breathable feel Firm surface can feel very on-top Back and combo sleepers who want steady support
Pro Hybrid Mattress 4.2 Balanced support with gentle contouring Some bounce compared with all-foam Most sleepers, especially combo sleepers
Classics 2.0 Mattress 4.0 No-frills support for the price Less cushioning for shoulders and hips Back sleepers and guest rooms
Jerome's-gel Pedic 5.0 Mattress 3.8 Excellent motion isolation (quiet feel) Softer edge, warmer feel Solo sleepers and smaller rooms

What stood out in testing?

GridTek felt the most dialed-in for support, especially through the hips, and it had the most dependable edge. Pro Hybrid was the easiest all-arounder in our group—it gave Mia a bit more shoulder comfort without losing alignment. Classics 2.0 kept things simple: firm, steady, and predictable, but with less cushioning. Jerome’s-gel Pedic 5.0 was the quietest and best at muting movement, but its edge felt softer and it held onto more warmth during long stretches.

Jerome’s mattresses: comparison chart

Comparison Item Jerome's GridTek Mattress Pro Hybrid Mattress Classics 2.0 Mattress Jerome's-gel Pedic 5.0 Mattress
Feel listed on product page Firm Firm Firm Firm
Thickness (queen shown) 14" 12" 10" 8"
Construction cues Grid layer + pocketed coils Hybrid (listed) Pocketed coils + foam layers Foam layers listed
Coil type Pocketed springs Pocketed coils Pocketed coils -
Noted foams/materials GridTek layer, copper memory foam, transition foam Copper infused memory foam, ZeroG foam, Jerome’s-gel memory foam, orthopedic base foam Gel memory foam, quilt foam, transition foam Gel memory foam, base foam
Cooling listed Yes Yes Cooling described -
Edge system called out Dream Edge perimeter - Dream Edge support base -
Adjustable base compatible Yes Yes - -
Warranty listed 25-year non-prorated 20-year non-prorated 20-year non-prorated 20-year non-prorated
My support impression Very strong, stable Strong, slightly more give Strong, firmer ride Moderate, more compression
My motion isolation impression Good for a coil build Good Fair-to-good Excellent
My cooling impression Very good airflow feel Good Fair-to-good Fair

How we tested Jerome’s mattresses

We put each mattress through the same routine: full-night sleep, a 30-minute reading session before bed, repeated position changes, and morning sit-and-stand tests at the edge. Scores for support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability come directly from how the beds felt during that routine—especially whether hips stayed level, whether heat built after about an hour, and how much movement carried across the surface.

Jerome’s mattresses: our testing experience

Jerome's GridTek Mattress

Jerome's GridTek Mattress

Our Testing Experience

The GridTek felt buoyant right away. Instead of letting my hips settle deep, it pushed back and kept my midsection level. On my back, my lower back stayed relaxed even after desk-heavy days.

On my side, it maintained alignment, but it didn’t offer a deep shoulder sink—Mia noticed that the most and preferred a lower-loft pillow to keep her neck neutral. Marcus liked how planted the perimeter felt when he sat to tie shoes and when he slept close to the edge.

What we liked

  • Buoyant, stable support that kept hips and lumbar area level

  • Stayed breathable during long, still stretches

  • Secure edge for sitting and sleeping near the perimeter

Who it is best for

  • Back and combo sleepers who like a firm, on-top feel

  • Heavier sleepers who want to avoid a hammocking sensation

  • Anyone who wants a steadier edge for daily in-and-out use

Where it falls short

  • Lightweight side sleepers who need more shoulder give

  • Shoppers who want a noticeably plush top layer

Listed highlights include a GridTek layer over pocketed springs, copper memory foam, a 14" profile, Dream Edge support, and a 25-year non-prorated warranty.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Strong, steady support under hips and lower back Firm surface can feel too “upright” for light side sleepers
Noticeably secure edge feel Less plush pressure relief than softer builds
Breathable feel over longer sessions -

Details

  • Firmness: Firm

  • Size shown: Queen

  • Thickness: 14"

  • Type: Tight top

  • Materials noted: Dream Ice cover, GridTek layer, copper memory foam, transition foam, pocketed springs

  • Cooling listed: Yes

  • Edge system noted: Dream Edge

  • Adjustable base compatible: Yes

  • Recommended rotation: Head to foot

  • Warranty: 25-year non-prorated

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Support 4.6 Consistently held my hips level; Marcus avoided “sag” feel
Cooling 4.5 Breathable surface feel, less heat buildup during long holds
Pressure Relief 4.3 Good contouring, but the firm top limited Mia’s shoulder sink
Motion Isolation 4.0 Better than many coil beds, still some bounce across the surface
Responsiveness 4.4 Easy position changes without feeling stuck
Edge Support 4.5 Confident sitting edge and stable sleep near perimeter
Durability 4.5 Sturdy construction and the longer warranty point to good long-term stability
Overall 4.4 Most complete “support-first” option in the set

Pro Hybrid Mattress

Pro Hybrid Mattress

Our Testing Experience

Pro Hybrid was the “middle lane” feel. It still supported my back, but the surface had more initial give than GridTek, which made side-starts easier.

Switching from side to back felt smooth and low-effort. Carlos paid most attention to alignment and liked the way the top layers eased you in before the support caught you. Marcus thought it was the easiest mattress to live with night after night, even if the sitting edge didn’t feel quite as braced as GridTek.

What we liked

  • Balanced mix of support and cushioning across positions

  • Cooling stayed consistent through an all-night session

  • Easy, low-resistance turns

Who it is best for

  • Combination sleepers who switch positions

  • Back sleepers who still want a touch of surface cushioning

  • Couples who want solid motion control without an all-foam feel

Where it falls short

  • Shoppers who want a deep, plush cradle

  • People who sit on the edge a lot and want the stiffest perimeter

Listed as a 12" hybrid with pocketed coils, firm comfort, and a 20-year non-prorated warranty.

Pro Hybrid Mattress

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Well-balanced comfort and support Edge support not as confidence-inspiring as GridTek
Good cooling feel for a hybrid build Still some bounce compared with all-foam
Easy to change positions -
Pro Hybrid Mattress

Details

  • Firmness: Firm

  • Size shown: Queen

  • Thickness: 12"

  • Mattress type listed: Hybrid

  • Materials noted: copper infused memory foam, ZeroG foam, Jerome’s-gel memory foam, orthopedic base foam; pocketed coils

  • Cooling listed: Yes

  • Adjustable base compatible: Yes

  • Cover: Dream Cool fabric

  • Warranty: 20-year non-prorated

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Support 4.4 Held alignment well across positions; Carlos stayed level
Cooling 4.3 Stayed comfortable through longer stretches without notable heat spike
Pressure Relief 4.2 Enough give for side starts; less sharp pressure than Classics
Motion Isolation 4.1 Solid dampening for a coil build, though not silent-flat
Responsiveness 4.2 Turns were smooth and low-effort
Edge Support 4.2 Stable for sleep near edge; sitting edge less firm than GridTek
Durability 4.2 Build quality and listed certifications suggest solid long-term value
Overall 4.2 Best “balanced” pick if you want one mattress to do most things well

Classics 2.0 Mattress

Classics 2.0 Mattress

Our Testing Experience

Classics 2.0 is the no-frills option: firm, stable, and consistent from night to night. On my back, it kept my hips level quickly, and Marcus liked the predictable support.

The trade-off showed up on longer side stretches—Mia felt more pressure at the shoulder and outer hip than she did on Pro Hybrid. For a guest room, this is a safe “firm and simple” choice, as long as you’re not shopping for a plush feel.

What we liked

  • Firm, predictable surface with dependable support

  • Stable feel when sitting and standing up

  • Straightforward build that feels value-focused

Who it is best for

  • Back sleepers who prefer a firmer ride

  • Heavier sleepers who don’t want much sink

  • Guest rooms where broad-appeal firmness matters

Where it falls short

  • Side sleepers who need more pressure relief

  • Anyone who wants a cushier top layer

Listed specs include gel memory foam over pocketed coils, a Dream Edge support base, a 10" profile, and a 20-year non-prorated warranty.

Classics 2.0 Mattress

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Firm, stable support that feels consistent Less pressure relief for shoulders and hips
Reinforced perimeter feel Not as “specialized” as GridTek or Pro Hybrid
Good value-oriented build cues -
Classics 2.0 Mattress

Details

  • Firmness: Firm

  • Size shown: Queen

  • Thickness: 10"

  • Construction notes: gel memory foam + pocketed coils

  • Cover notes: stretch knit fabric and quilt layer

  • Back support listed: Dream Zone

  • Support base listed: Dream Edge

  • Warranty: 20-year non-prorated

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Support 4.2 Firm stability helped keep hips level, especially for Marcus
Cooling 4.0 No major heat spikes, but less airy than GridTek
Pressure Relief 3.9 Noticeable pressure for Mia during long side holds
Motion Isolation 3.8 More vibration across the surface than Pro Hybrid
Responsiveness 4.0 Easy enough to turn, not sticky
Edge Support 4.1 Perimeter felt supportive for daily use
Durability 4.0 Solid build cues with warranty coverage
Overall 4.0 Reliable and firm, with fewer “comfort luxuries” than the top two

Jerome's-gel Pedic 5.0 Mattress

Jerome's-gel Pedic 5.0 Mattress

Our Testing Experience

Jerome’s-gel Pedic 5.0 was the simplest feel to describe: foam compresses under you and the bed stays quiet. It was the calmest surface for reading in bed and did the best job preventing movement from traveling.

The downsides were clear, too. The edge felt softer when I sat to lace up shoes, and after longer stretches on my back, it held onto more warmth than the hybrid models. Mia also noticed it took a little more effort to reposition compared with the springier beds.

What we liked

  • Best motion isolation and the quietest surface

  • Simple, no-bounce feel that works well solo

  • Firm foam support that stayed consistent

Who it is best for

  • Motion-sensitive sleepers

  • Solo sleepers who want a quieter foam feel

  • Smaller rooms where an 8" profile fits better

Where it falls short

  • People who rely on a sturdy sitting edge

  • Hot sleepers who want maximum airflow

Jerome’s lists an 8" queen profile with gel memory foam and orthopedic base foam, plus a 20-year non-prorated warranty.

Pros & Cons

Pros Cons
Best motion isolation of the four Edge support felt weaker than coil builds
Quiet, low-bounce surface More heat retention over long sessions
Straightforward foam feel Less responsive when switching positions

Details

  • Firmness: Firm

  • Size shown: Queen

  • Thickness: 8"

  • Foams noted: Jerome’s-gel memory foam, orthopedic base foam

  • Cover: Jerome’s 8-way stretch fabric

  • Warranty: 20-year non-prorated

Review Score

Metric Score Remarks
Support 3.9 Adequate support, but less “lift” than the hybrids
Cooling 3.6 More heat retention during longer holds
Pressure Relief 3.7 Comfortable initially; less adaptive than Pro Hybrid for side sleep
Motion Isolation 4.5 Quietest surface with the least movement transfer
Responsiveness 3.5 Slightly more effort to turn compared with hybrids
Edge Support 3.6 Sitting edge and perimeter felt less secure
Durability 3.8 Solid warranty, but thinner profile reduced confidence for heavier users
Overall 3.8 Best for motion control, weaker on edge and cooling

Side-by-side performance scores

Mattress Overall Score Support Pressure Relief Cooling Motion Isolation Durability Responsiveness
Jerome's GridTek Mattress 4.4 4.6 4.3 4.5 4.0 4.5 4.4
Pro Hybrid Mattress 4.2 4.4 4.2 4.3 4.1 4.2 4.2
Classics 2.0 Mattress 4.0 4.2 3.9 4.0 3.8 4.0 4.0
Jerome's-gel Pedic 5.0 Mattress 3.8 3.9 3.7 3.6 4.5 3.8 3.5

If you want the most even performance across categories, Pro Hybrid is the safe bet. GridTek leads on stability, edge security, and the most breathable feel. Classics 2.0 is the firm value option—steady support with less cushioning. Jerome’s-gel Pedic 5.0 is the motion-isolation pick, but it gives up ground on edge support and cooling.

How to choose a Jerome’s mattress

Start with your main sleep position and how firm you want the top to feel. If you want the most stable surface (or you’re heavier), GridTek is the safest bet. If you switch positions and want a smoother blend of cushioning and support, go with Pro Hybrid. If you’re shopping on value and prefer a simple, firm ride, Classics 2.0 fits the brief. If you’re sensitive to movement and want a quieter surface, Jerome’s-gel Pedic 5.0 does that best.

Limitations to know before you buy

The models we tested lean firm overall, so lightweight side sleepers may struggle to get enough shoulder give—especially on GridTek and Classics 2.0. The quieter, lower-bounce feel comes most clearly from the all-foam Jerome’s-gel Pedic 5.0, but that trade-off shows up in softer edges and more heat retention during long holds. If you need a truly plush top, you’ll likely want a different comfort tier than the models covered here.

Jerome’s mattresses vs. alternatives

These Jerome’s models make the most sense if you want firmer support, straightforward builds, and hybrids that prioritize stability over a plush sink. If you’d rather have a medium-feel hybrid tuned for side-sleeper pressure relief and lumbar zoning, consider the Helix Midnight Luxe. If you want an organic latex-and-coil hybrid with a naturally cooler, springier feel, Avocado’s Organic 11" Hybrid is another option.

Practical tips for Jerome’s mattress owners

  • Give yourself about two weeks before you judge firmness; most people feel the adjustment first in the shoulders and hips.

  • If you’re a side sleeper on a firmer model, try a lower-loft pillow to reduce neck tilt.

  • On softer edges, sit closer to the center before you fully load the corner—especially on thinner foam beds.

  • If you’re on the all-foam option and sleep warm, keep the room cooler or use more breathable bedding.

  • Use a mattress protector early to help prevent spills from changing the feel of the comfort layer over time.

  • If the manufacturer recommends it, rotate head-to-foot on a consistent schedule (GridTek, in particular).

  • For couples, motion isolation tends to matter first, then edge support; those two drive most nightly disturbances.

  • If a firm surface creates hip pressure, a thin, responsive topper is usually better than a thick plush pad that can reduce support.

  • If you use an adjustable base, double-check compatibility on the models that list it.

FAQs

Q: Which model felt most supportive for back sleepers?

Q: Which one is best for motion-sensitive sleepers?

Q: Which model felt most balanced across positions?

Q: Which one felt firmest at the surface?

Previous post
Next post
Back to Best Mattress Reviews

Our Testing Team

Chris Miller

Lead Tester

Chris oversees the full testing pipeline for mattresses, sofas, and other home products. He coordinates the team, designs scoring frameworks, and lives with every product long enough to feel real strengths and weaknesses. His combination-sleeping and mixed lounging habits keep him focused on long-term comfort and support.

Marcus Reed

Heavyweight Sofa & Mattress Tester

Marcus brings a heavier build and heat-sensitive profile into every test. He pushes deep cushions, edges, and frames harder than most users. His feedback highlights whether a design holds up under load, runs hot, or collapses into a hammock-like slump during long gaming or streaming sessions.

Carlos Alvarez

Posture & Work-From-Home Specialist

Carlos spends long hours working from sofas and beds with a laptop. He tracks how mid-back, neck, and lumbar regions respond to different setups. His notes reveal whether a product keeps posture neutral during extended sitting or lying, and whether small adjustments still feel stable and controlled.

Mia Chen

Petite Side-Sleeper & Lounger

Mia tests how mattresses and sofas treat a smaller frame during side sleeping and curled-up lounging. She feels pressure and seat-depth problems very quickly. Her feedback exposes designs that swallow shorter users, leave feet dangling, or create sharp pressure points at shoulders, hips, and knees.

Jenna Brooks

Couple Comfort & Motion Tester

Jenna evaluates how well sofas and mattresses handle real shared use with a partner. She tracks motion transfer, usable width, and edge comfort when two adults spread out. Her comments highlight whether a product supports relaxed couple lounging, easy repositioning, and quiet nights without constant disturbance.

Jamal Davis

Tall, Active-Body Tester

Jamal brings a tall, athletic frame and post-workout soreness into the lab. He checks seat depth, leg support, and surface responsiveness on every product. His notes show whether cushions bounce back, frames feel solid under long legs, and sleep surfaces support joints during recovery stretches and naps.

Ethan Cole

Restless Lounger & Partner Tester

Ethan acts as the moving partner in many couple-focused tests. He shifts positions frequently and pays attention to how easily a surface lets him turn, slide, or return after short breaks. His feedback exposes cushions that feel too squishy, too sticky, or poorly shaped for real-world lounging patterns.