Greenville Mattress is positioned as a value-forward lineup of closeout-style mattress sets, leaning heavily into straightforward innerspring builds with a few upgraded, cooler-feeling options at higher price points. I focused our testing on support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability, because the strengths here are typically stability and price, while the risks are bounce, pressure buildup, and partner disturbance.
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Windsor Firm | 4.3 | Strong edge stability; cooler-to-touch cover feel; confident full-body support | Firmer surface feel can feel “taught” for lighter side sleepers | Hot sleepers who still want a firm, stable surface |
| Normandy Firm | 4.0 | Balanced support-to-contour; dependable edges; steady temperature | Not as pressure-soft as plush options; limited size range | Back sleepers wanting a medium-firm, tidy feel |
| Glen Cove Pillow Top | 3.8 | Cushioned top feel; friendly for mixed positions; easy to move on | More bounce; motion carries more than encased-coil builds | Side sleepers needing a softer first contact |
| Monetta Firm | 3.7 | Clean, firm support; predictable edges; simple feel | Less pressure relief; more movement transfer | Budget-focused sleepers who prefer firm |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the four, we found the clearest “safe bet” to be Windsor Firm for edge stability and cooling comfort, while Normandy Firm landed as the most even-handed for back sleep support and all-night alignment. Glen Cove Pillow Top delivered the most instantly cushioned surface for Mia’s side-sleeping comfort, but it also allowed more bounce and partner movement. Monetta Firm stayed simple and supportive, yet it was the easiest to “feel the springs” during motion tests.
Greenville Mattress Comparison Chart
| Spec / Performance | Windsor Firm | Normandy Firm | Glen Cove Pillow Top | Monetta Firm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price range | $722.99–$1,417.99 | $555.99–$1,217.99 | $376.99–$887.99 | $298.99–$687.99 |
| Height | 13" | 10 1/2" | 11" | 9 1/2" |
| Available sizes | Full, Queen, King | Full, Queen, King | Twin, Full, Queen, King | Twin, Full, Queen, King |
| Coil system | 8" fabric-encased coils + foam border | 6" fabric-encased coils + foam border | 416 Bonnel coil system | Innerspring, foam-encased |
| Comfort materials | Gel-infused foam; gel memory foam; quilt foam | Gel-infused foam; quilt foam; ultra-firm upholstery foam | Comfort foam; ultra comfort foam; gel memory foam | - |
| Cooling approach | Cooling yarn cover; gel foams | Gel-infused foam | Gel memory foam (thin layer) | - |
| Feel (from testing) | Firm | Medium-firm | Medium with plush top | Firm |
| Motion isolation (from testing) | Good | Good | Fair | Fair |
| Edge support (from testing) | Very good | Good | Fair-good | Good |
How We Tested It
We rotated each mattress through the same routine: back and side sleep blocks, timed position changes, and “edge-living” sessions where we sat, tied shoes, and worked on a laptop at the perimeter. Marcus pushed heat buildup and sag resistance, Mia tracked shoulder/hip pressure during long side stretches, and Jenna ran partner-motion checks with Ethan using repeated in-and-out cycles and mid-night resettling. We scored Support, Cooling, Pressure Relief, Motion Isolation, Responsiveness, Edge Support, and Durability as the full basis for every rating.
Greenville Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Windsor Firm
Our Testing Experience
The first night on Windsor Firm felt like stepping onto a stable platform that didn’t negotiate much—no dramatic sink, no “wallow,” just a firm, upright hold. I noticed my lower back stayed quiet when I rolled from back to side, and the center didn’t dip when I sat to read. Marcus immediately liked how it resisted heat and kept his hips from dropping. Jenna and Ethan both called out how the surface “settled fast” after movement—less ripple than we expected for a firmer build.
What we liked
-
Crisp, confidence-inspiring support that kept hips level
-
Cooler surface feel that stayed consistent past midnight
-
Strong edge stability for sitting and near-edge sleep
Who it is best for
-
Back sleepers who want firm, tidy alignment
-
Hot sleepers who still want a dense, supportive feel
-
Couples who use the outer third of the bed
Where it falls short
-
Mia found it too firm at the shoulder for extended side sleep
-
If you want a plush “hug,” this won’t deliver it
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong edge support | Too firm for many lightweight side sleepers |
| Cooler-to-touch cover feel | Less contouring than plush options |
| Stable support when sitting/reading | - |
Details
-
Price range: $722.99–$1,417.99
-
Height: 13"
-
Sizes: Full, Queen, King
-
Cover: performance stretch-knit fabric with cooling yarns
-
Comfort layers: gel-infused foam; gel memory foam; quilt foam (plus firm upholstery foams listed)
-
Support core: 8" fabric-encased coil system with strong foam border
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.6 | Kept hips level and minimized “hammocking,” especially for Marcus. |
| Cooling | 4.4 | Surface stayed noticeably steadier in temperature overnight. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.9 | Good for back sleep; firmer feel limited shoulder sink for Mia. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.1 | Jenna and Ethan felt fewer aftershocks after getting in/out of bed. |
| Responsiveness | 4.0 | Easy turns without a stuck-in-foam sensation. |
| Edge Support | 4.5 | Confident perimeter sitting and near-edge sleep stability. |
| Durability | 4.3 | Denser feel and reinforced edge suggested better long-haul structure. |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Strongest mix of stability, cooling, and edge performance. |
Normandy Firm
Our Testing Experience
Normandy Firm landed as the “middle lane” in the best way: supportive first, but not as unyielding as Windsor. When I lay flat, my midsection felt held up, and when I rolled to my side, my hips sank just enough to keep my spine from feeling twisted. Marcus still got the firm support he needs, while Mia tolerated short side stretches better than on Windsor—though she still wanted more give at the shoulder. Jenna liked the edge behavior: sitting to put on shoes didn’t feel like sliding off a soft lip.
What we liked
-
Balanced contour-to-support that felt consistent across positions
-
Edges that stayed usable for sitting and near-edge sleep
-
A “clean” surface feel that didn’t get swampy overnight
Who it is best for
-
Average-weight back sleepers seeking medium-firm alignment
-
Combination sleepers who rotate positions without wanting deep sink
-
People who want a supportive feel without extreme firmness
Where it falls short
-
Side sleepers wanting plush pressure relief may find it too firm
-
Size options are narrower than some models
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Even support-to-contour balance | Not plush enough for many side sleepers |
| Dependable edges | Limited size range |
| Stable feel for position changes | - |
Details
-
Price range: $555.99–$1,217.99
-
Height: 10 1/2"
-
Sizes: Full, Queen, King
-
Cover: designer knit fabric (listed as 4-way stretch)
-
Comfort layers: gel-infused foam; quilt foam; ultra-firm high density upholstery foam
-
Support core: 6" fabric-encased coil system with strong foam border; plus base foam (listed)
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4 | Reliable alignment on back and side without feeling rigid. |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Stayed comfortable for Marcus, though less “cool-to-touch” than Windsor. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.7 | Adequate for combo sleep; shoulder pressure rose during long side blocks. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Partner movement was noticeable but not disruptive in most cycles. |
| Responsiveness | 3.8 | Smooth turns; slightly more surface drag than Windsor. |
| Edge Support | 4.3 | Strong foam border kept the perimeter usable. |
| Durability | 4.1 | Encased-coil structure and firmer foams felt structurally steady. |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Most balanced option for back sleep and mixed positions. |
Glen Cove Pillow Top
Our Testing Experience
Glen Cove Pillow Top felt immediately different: a softer first contact, then a quicker rebound underneath that made it easy to shift positions. For me, reading in bed felt comfortable because the top had cushion without swallowing my hips. Mia liked the initial pressure relief—her shoulder sank more naturally than on the two firm models. The trade-off showed up during motion checks: when Jenna and Ethan ran their in-and-out routine, the surface carried more bounce across the bed, and the “settle time” was longer.
What we liked
-
Cushioned top feel that reduced sharp shoulder pressure
-
Easy position changes without feeling trapped
-
Comfortable for lounging and light reading posture
Who it is best for
-
Side sleepers needing softer surface comfort
-
Combination sleepers who like a bit of bounce
-
Guest-room setups where “instant comfort” matters
Where it falls short
-
More motion travel for couples than the encased-coil options
-
Edge use felt less confidence-inspiring during prolonged sitting
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Softer top feel for pressure relief | More bounce and motion travel |
| Easy to move on | Edge felt less steady for long sitting |
| Comfortable for lounging | - |
Details
-
Price range: $376.99–$887.99
-
Height: 11"
-
Sizes: Twin, Full, Queen, King
-
Comfort layers: 2" comfort foam; 2" ultra comfort foam; 1/2" full-length gel memory foam
-
Support core: 416 high-profile Bonnel coil system
-
Base layers: 1" high-density comfort foam; 1 1/2" base support foam
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.0 | Supported my back well, but felt less “locked in” under heavier movement. |
| Cooling | 3.6 | Comfortable overall, though it warmed faster than the firmer, cooler-feel builds. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Best shoulder/hip comfort for Mia across long side stretches. |
| Motion Isolation | 3.4 | Jenna and Ethan felt more bounce and cross-bed movement. |
| Responsiveness | 4.1 | Quick to move on; didn’t feel sticky. |
| Edge Support | 3.7 | Fine for occasional sitting, less stable for extended edge use. |
| Durability | 3.8 | Softer top and Bonnel coil feel suggested a bit more long-term variability. |
| Overall Score | 3.8 | Best for plush comfort, weaker for motion control. |
Monetta Firm
Our Testing Experience
Monetta Firm came across as the most straightforward: firm, quick, and slightly spring-forward in feel. I could tell right away it wasn’t trying to create a deep contour—more of a “sleep on top” profile. Marcus appreciated that his hips stayed up, but he also felt the bed broadcast movement more than Windsor and Normandy. Mia was the quickest to call out pressure buildup on her side; after a longer stretch, she wanted a softer top layer. For sitting on the edge, though, it behaved predictably and didn’t collapse.
What we liked
-
Firm, predictable support that stayed even across the surface
-
Easy turns and quick response when changing positions
-
Solid perimeter feel for basic edge sitting
Who it is best for
-
Back sleepers who prefer a firmer, simpler build
-
Budget shoppers prioritizing support over cushioning
-
Guest-room use where durability and simplicity matter
Where it falls short
-
Pressure relief is limited for side sleepers
-
Motion travels more than on the encased-coil, thicker models
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Simple, firm support | Limited pressure relief for side sleepers |
| Predictable edges | More noticeable motion transfer |
| Easy to move on | - |
Details
-
Price range: $298.99–$687.99
-
Height: 9 1/2"
-
Sizes: Twin, Full, Queen, King
-
Type: innerspring
-
Construction note: foam-encased
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.1 | Firm, even hold that kept my hips from dipping. |
| Cooling | 3.7 | Stayed acceptable, but lacked the “cool-feel” elements of Windsor. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.3 | Mia felt shoulder/hip pressure sooner during long side blocks. |
| Motion Isolation | 3.1 | More movement carried across the surface during partner-motion routines. |
| Responsiveness | 4.0 | Quick and easy turns; no stuck feeling. |
| Edge Support | 4.0 | Reliable for basic sitting and getting dressed. |
| Durability | 3.7 | Simple structure felt steady, but with fewer comfort features to buffer feel changes. |
| Overall Score | 3.7 | A firm, budget-friendly pick with clear motion and pressure trade-offs. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Windsor Firm | 4.3 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.0 |
| Normandy Firm | 4.0 | 4.4 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.8 |
| Glen Cove Pillow Top | 3.8 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.8 | 4.1 |
| Monetta Firm | 3.7 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 3.7 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 4.0 |
The numbers tell a clear story: Windsor Firm is the most evenly strong across stability-focused metrics, with Normandy Firm close behind as the “balanced” option. Glen Cove Pillow Top stands out for pressure relief and easy movement, but it gives back points on motion control. Monetta Firm stays supportive for the price, yet its biggest weakness is partner disturbance and side-sleep pressure comfort.
How to Choose the Greenville Mattress?
Start with sleep position and sensitivity: side sleepers should prioritize surface comfort (Glen Cove Pillow Top), while back sleepers who want firmer alignment should start with Normandy Firm or Monetta Firm. If you run hot or use the edge frequently, Windsor Firm is the cleanest match. For couples, favor the encased-coil options (Windsor or Normandy) to reduce motion issues. If budget is the main constraint, Monetta Firm is the simplest support-first option.
Limitations
The lineup trends toward firmer, more traditional innerspring feel, so ultra-plush “deep hug” comfort is limited. Glen Cove Pillow Top is not ideal for couples who wake easily from partner movement, and Monetta Firm is not a good fit for sensitive side sleepers who need sustained shoulder and hip pressure relief. Windsor Firm can feel too firm for lighter bodies.
Greenville Mattress Vs. Alternatives
-
Why choose these models
-
Strong value positioning with straightforward, support-forward builds
-
Multiple firmness directions (firm cores with select cushioned tops)
-
Several options emphasize usable edges and stable, easy movement
-
-
Alternatives to consider
-
Saatva Classic: a more premium-feeling innerspring experience with broader finish options
-
Tempur-Pedic Adapt: for shoppers who want a slower-responding, pressure-focused foam feel
-
Brooklyn Bedding Signature Hybrid: for a more modern hybrid balance across firmness choices
-
Pro Tips for Greenville Mattress
-
Use a breathable mattress protector to keep surface feel consistent while protecting the comfort layers.
-
If you sleep on your side, pair firmer models with a slightly thicker, pressure-softening pillow to reduce shoulder load.
-
For couples, test your most common wake-up routine (bathroom, early alarm) and choose the mattress that settles fastest.
-
Spend time sitting on the edge the way you actually live—shoes, socks, stretching—before you decide.
-
If you sleep hot, prioritize airflow in the room and lighter bedding so cooling features can actually matter.
-
Rotate the mattress periodically to keep wear patterns even, especially if one side is used more.
-
If you feel lower-back tightness, evaluate whether your hips sink more than your ribs when you’re on your side.
-
For guest rooms, pick the model with the broadest “neutral” comfort rather than the most specialized feel.
-
If you read or work in bed, judge how stable the surface feels under a seated posture near the edge.
FAQs
Which Greenville Mattress model felt best for side sleepers?
Glen Cove Pillow Top was the most comfortable for side sleep in our testing because the top felt more cushioned at the shoulder and outer hip, reducing pressure buildup over longer stretches.
Which model handled partner movement the best?
Windsor Firm did the best job limiting disruptive aftershocks when one person got in and out of bed, with Normandy Firm close behind.
Which model is the simplest, firmest feel for the money?
Monetta Firm delivered the most straightforward firm, spring-forward support at the lowest price tier we tested, with fewer comfort-layer “extras” than the higher-priced options.
