Early Bird’s bed-in-a-box lineup leans on cooling materials and simple comfort options, with both all-foam and hybrid builds that mostly land in the medium-to-firm range. In our testing, the hybrids felt steadier under the hips and easier to move on, while the foam models did the best job dampening motion but felt more sensitive to body weight and sleep position.
Table of contents
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Early Bird Dual Cool 8" Medium Memory Foam Mattress | 3.7 | Excellent motion isolation; simple, predictable feel | Thinner comfort stack for larger bodies; softer edge sitting | Light to average-weight sleepers |
| Early Bird Dual Cool 10" Medium Hybrid Mattress | 4.1 | Balanced support and contouring; easy to move on | Not as quiet as all-foam for motion | Most sleep styles; combo sleepers |
| Early Bird CopperCool Performance 10" Medium Hybrid Mattress | 4.2 | Coolest feel in this set; steady support | Some motion transfer from coils | Hot sleepers; mixed-position sleepers |
| Early Bird CopperCool Performance 12" Firm Memory Foam Mattress | 4.0 | Very stable, low-motion surface | Too firm for many side sleepers | Back sleepers; firm fans |
Testing Team Takeaways
I’m a combo sleeper with occasional lower-back tightness, so we kept coming back to lumbar support and hip alignment during full nights and long “laptop-in-bed” stretches. Marcus (hot sleeper, 230 lbs) consistently preferred the hybrids for steadier hips and faster heat release. Mia (125 lbs, side sleeper) liked the quieter all-foam feel, but needed the right pillow height to keep her neck neutral. Jamal (athletic, 210 lbs) favored the hybrids because they made position changes feel easy and controlled.
Early Bird Mattress Comparison Chart
| Item | Dual Cool 8" Medium Memory Foam | Dual Cool 10" Medium Hybrid | CopperCool Performance 10" Medium Hybrid | CopperCool Performance 12" Firm Memory Foam |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mattress type | Gel memory foam | Hybrid | Hybrid | Gel memory foam |
| Thickness | 8 in | 10 in | 10 in | 12 in |
| Comfort level | Medium | Medium | Medium | Firm |
| Available sizes | Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen | Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, Cal King | Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, Cal King | Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, Cal King |
| Materials (listed) | Dual foam layers; support foam | Multiple foams + wrapped coils | Copper-infused foam + wrapped coils | Copper-infused foam + gel memory foam |
| Cooling (test impression) | Cool to the touch; warms with time | Better airflow; steadier temperature | Coolest of the four | Cooler than typical foam, still warms late night |
| Support (test impression) | Best for lighter sleepers | Most balanced | Most consistently supportive | Very stable, especially for back sleeping |
| Motion isolation (test impression) | Strongest | Moderate | Moderate | Strong |
| Responsiveness (test impression) | Slowest | Quick | Quick | Slow-moderate |
| Edge support (test impression) | Fair | Good | Good | Fair-good |
| Warranty (listed) | 10-year limited | 10-year limited | 10-year limited | 10-year limited |
How We Tested It
We rotated through full-night sleep blocks and daytime “real-life” use (reading, working on a laptop, and sitting on the edge) using our mattress testing process to score Support, Cooling, Pressure Relief, Motion Isolation, Responsiveness, Edge Support, and Durability. I tracked whether my hips stayed level and how my lower back felt the next morning. Marcus pushed heat and edge checks, Mia focused on shoulder/hip pressure while side sleeping, and Jamal stressed ease of turning during quick position changes.
Early Bird Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Early Bird Dual Cool 8" Medium Memory Foam Mattress
Our testing experience
The first thing that stood out was how quiet the surface felt—no coil feedback and barely any ripple when I shifted. On my side, my shoulder sank in quickly and the top layer felt pleasantly contouring. After a longer stretch in one spot (reading), the thinner 8-inch profile became more obvious: you reach the firmer support layers sooner than on the thicker models.
Marcus warmed it up faster than I did. He could keep it comfortable, but he didn’t trust the edge as much when sitting down to tie his shoes. Mia liked the calm, low-motion feel, but only after she adjusted her pillow loft so her neck stayed neutral.
What we liked
-
Very quiet surface that limits partner disturbance
-
Straightforward medium feel that’s easy to predict (especially for lighter bodies)
Who it is best for
-
Lightweight side sleepers who want a calmer foam feel
-
Guest rooms and light sleepers who prioritize motion isolation
Where it falls short
-
Heavier sleepers may bottom out through the comfort layers
-
Edge sitting feels softer than the hybrids
Pros & cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent motion isolation; simple setup; gentle contouring | Less cushion depth for heavier sleepers; softer edge sitting; slower position changes |
Details
-
Firmness: Medium
-
Size: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen
-
Thickness: 8 in
-
Type: Gel memory foam
-
Materials: Dual foam layers; durable support foam; breathable comfort cover
-
Motion isolation (feature): Low motion transfer
-
Warranty: 10-year limited manufacturer
-
Weight capacity: 500 lb
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.6 | Fine for average weight; less steady under higher load |
| Cooling | 3.8 | Starts cool, then warms after long contact |
| Pressure Relief | 4.0 | Comfortable for side sleeping with good pillow pairing |
| Motion Isolation | 4.4 | Best at dampening movement in this set |
| Responsiveness | 3.4 | Noticeably slower to change positions |
| Edge Support | 3.2 | Sitting support is softer than the hybrids |
| Durability | 3.5 | Thinner build means less margin for heavier use |
| Overall | 3.7 | Quiet and comfortable, but position and weight sensitive |
Early Bird Dual Cool 10" Medium Hybrid Mattress
Our testing experience
This was the first model where my hips felt lifted instead of sinking and stalling. Rolling from back to side took less effort—the surface has some spring, but it didn’t feel jumpy or unstable.
Marcus preferred it over the 8-inch foam right away because he could sleep flatter without that subtle hammocking sensation. Mia felt supported, though on her side it took a little time for the top layers to relax. Jamal kept calling it the easiest to move on—especially when you’re half asleep and just want to reset without thinking.
What we liked
-
Balanced contour and support with a more stable base
-
Quick response that makes turning feel easier
Who it is best for
-
Combination sleepers who change positions
-
Back and stomach sleepers who need steadier hip support
Where it falls short
-
Light sleepers may notice more partner movement than on all-foam
-
If you want deep plushness, the top can feel a bit firm
Pros & cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong all-around support; easy to change positions; more stable edges | Motion isolation is moderate; not the plushest feel for strict side sleepers |
Details
-
Firmness: Medium
-
Size: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, California King
-
Thickness: 10 in
-
Type: Hybrid
-
Materials: Omnisense comfort foam (2 layers); cooling gel memory foam; support foam; IsoCore individually wrapped coils
-
Motion isolation (feature): Low motion transfer
-
Warranty: 10-year limited manufacturer
-
Weight capacity: 500 lb
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2 | Coils keep hips level and reduce saggy feel |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Airflow feels steadier across long nights |
| Pressure Relief | 4.1 | Good blend; not ultra-plush but effective |
| Motion Isolation | 3.8 | Reduced motion, but not “foam silent” |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Turns feel smooth and quick |
| Edge Support | 4.0 | More secure for sitting and edge sleeping |
| Durability | 4.1 | Hybrid build feels robust over repeated use |
| Overall | 4.1 | Best “one mattress for most people” option |
Early Bird CopperCool Performance 10" Medium Hybrid Mattress
Our testing experience
If the Dual Cool hybrid felt balanced, the CopperCool hybrid felt like the cooler-running sibling—especially during the first half of the night. Marcus noticed less heat collecting around his midsection and fewer wake-ups to kick the comforter off.
I liked how it held my lumbar area when I started on my back, then let me transition to my side without a sudden firmness jump. Jamal did his rapid-turn test and said it stayed consistent—no sticky resistance, just a steady reset. You can still tell it’s a hybrid in motion, but it didn’t feel overly bouncy.
What we liked
-
Coolest overall temperature feel in this lineup
-
Steady support with easy movement
Who it is best for
-
Hot sleepers who still want a responsive surface
-
Combo sleepers who dislike slow, sink-in foam
Where it falls short
-
All-foam models are quieter for motion
-
Medium feel isn’t plush; some side sleepers may want a softer top
Pros & cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Coolest overall feel; steady support; easy movement | Not as motion-deadening as all-foam; medium feel may be too firm for some side sleepers |
Details
-
Firmness: Medium
-
Size: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, California King
-
Thickness: 10 in
-
Type: Hybrid
-
Materials: Copper-infused performance foam; cooling gel memory foam; support foam; individually wrapped coils
-
Motion isolation (feature): Low motion transfer
-
Warranty: 10-year limited manufacturer
-
Weight capacity: 500 lb
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2 | Strong midsection support without feeling hard |
| Cooling | 4.3 | Most consistently cool in our rotation |
| Pressure Relief | 4.0 | Support-forward contouring; solid but not plush |
| Motion Isolation | 3.8 | Similar to the other hybrid: good, not silent |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Easy turn and quick recovery |
| Edge Support | 4.0 | Stable enough for edge sleeping and sitting |
| Durability | 4.1 | Hybrid build feels steady under repeated use |
| Overall | 4.2 | Best pick if heat control is the priority |
Early Bird CopperCool Performance 12" Firm Memory Foam Mattress
Our testing experience
This one reads “firm” the moment you sit down—less sink, more of a flat, platform-like feel. On my back, it kept me aligned and my lower back stayed supported without the floating sensation you can get on softer foams.
Marcus liked the firmer hip control, but he still warmed the surface more than he did on the CopperCool hybrid. Mia hit the pressure-relief limit sooner: she could side-sleep, but didn’t want to stay there for hours without a softer top layer. Jamal appreciated the stability when kneeling and stretching, but he had to work a bit more to roll than he did on the hybrids.
What we liked
-
Most stable, no-wobble support in the set
-
Very low motion disturbance for a firmer feel
Who it is best for
-
Back sleepers who prefer a firmer surface
-
Anyone who dislikes deep sink and wants steadier alignment
Where it falls short
-
Side sleepers may feel shoulder and hip pressure over long stretches
-
Foam response is slower than either hybrid
Pros & cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Firm, stable support; strong motion isolation; thicker feel | Less forgiving for side sleeping; slower repositioning than hybrids |
Details
-
Firmness: Firm
-
Size: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, California King
-
Thickness: 12 in
-
Type: Gel memory foam
-
Materials: Copper-infused performance foam; cooling gel memory foam; support foam
-
Motion isolation (feature): Low motion transfer
-
Warranty: 10-year limited manufacturer
-
Weight capacity: 300 lb
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.3 | Firm, steady spinal support—especially on back |
| Cooling | 3.9 | Cooler than many foams, still warms late night |
| Pressure Relief | 3.5 | Firm feel can load shoulders/hips on side |
| Motion Isolation | 4.5 | Excellent dampening and low disturbance |
| Responsiveness | 3.5 | Firmer foam, but still slower than hybrids |
| Edge Support | 3.6 | Better than thin foam, less than hybrids |
| Durability | 4.1 | Thick, support-forward build feels resilient |
| Overall | 4.0 | Great firm stability, less side-sleeper friendly |
Performance Score Comparison
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dual Cool 8" Medium Memory Foam | 3.7 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 4.4 | 3.5 | 3.4 |
| Dual Cool 10" Medium Hybrid | 4.1 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.2 |
| CopperCool Performance 10" Medium Hybrid | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.2 |
| CopperCool Performance 12" Firm Memory Foam | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 3.9 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Both hybrids were the strongest all-around performers, with the CopperCool hybrid leading on Cooling and the Dual Cool hybrid feeling a touch more “works for most people.” The firm CopperCool all-foam model stood out for Motion Isolation and stable Support, but traded away some Pressure Relief and Responsiveness. The Dual Cool 8-inch foam option was the quietest, with the clearest compromise in edge stability and overall depth.
How to Choose an Early Bird Mattress
Start with the Dual Cool 8" foam if you’re light enough to enjoy the gentler contour and you want the quietest motion control. If you rotate positions—or you carry more weight through the hips—the Dual Cool 10" hybrid is the safest all-around pick. If heat control is your top priority, the CopperCool Performance 10" hybrid felt coolest in our rotation. If you want a firmer, flatter surface (especially for back sleeping), the CopperCool Performance 12" firm foam is the most support-forward option.
Limitations
Most models in this lineup land on the medium-to-firm side, so strict side sleepers who need a plush top may want something softer. The all-foam options are quieter for motion but can feel slower to reposition on; the hybrids respond faster but don’t mute movement as completely. Also note that weight capacity differs by model, which can change how supportive the mattress feels for different body types.
Early Bird Mattress vs. Alternatives
Why choose these models
- Made-in-USA positioning, CertiPUR-US foam, and a 10-year limited warranty across these listings
- Simple lineup: all-foam for quieter motion, hybrids for easier movement
- Cooling-focused materials are a consistent theme in the Dual Cool and CopperCool descriptions
Alternatives to consider
- DreamCloud Classic Hybrid: a common value hybrid to compare if you want a bouncier, more traditional spring feel.
- Nectar Premier Memory Foam: a classic slow-foam option to cross-shop if motion isolation is your top priority.
Pro Tips for Early Bird Mattress
-
Give the mattress time to fully expand before judging firmness—especially foam-heavy models.
-
Use a supportive base; hybrids feel best on a rigid foundation or properly spaced slats.
-
If you sleep hot, pair it with breathable sheets and lighter bedding so the cooling materials can do their job.
-
On firmer models, dial in pillow height first—neck angle often decides whether the bed feels “too firm.”
-
Rotate periodically to even out wear, especially if you sleep in the same spot.
-
If you sit on the edge daily (shoes/socks), hybrids usually tolerate that routine better than thinner foams.
-
For couples, a sturdy, non-wobbly frame matters as much as the mattress for motion control.
-
If foam feels sticky when you move, a smoother protector and fitted sheet can reduce that drag.
-
Track morning stiffness for a full week to separate “new feel” from true support.
FAQs
Which Early Bird model is best for hot sleepers?
The CopperCool Performance 10" hybrid felt the coolest and most stable overnight.
Which model works best for side sleepers?
Lighter side sleepers tended to prefer the Dual Cool 8" foam; both hybrids felt firmer at the shoulder.
Do the hybrids isolate motion well enough for couples?
They cut down on movement, but the all-foam models stayed quieter.
Which model feels the firmest?
The CopperCool Performance 12" firm memory foam.
