Dutch Craft Mattress is positioned as a handcrafted, factory-built lineup sold through retailers, with an emphasis on durability-focused construction and long-term value. Over several weeks, I tested four Comfort Response models across support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability cues, then matched those impressions to a consistent 5-point scoring system.
The Dutch Craft mattresses we tested
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivia Firm | 4.1 | Stable midsection support; tidy edges; balanced feel | Not the “deep hug” some side sleepers want | Back sleepers and combo sleepers who want steadiness | $810 |
| Sophia Pillow Top | 4.1 | Strong pressure relief; quieter feel for couples; plush top comfort | Heavier stomach sleepers may feel too much sink | Side sleepers and couples who want more cushion | $1,080 |
| Alaina Hybrid | 4.2 | Quick response for turning; supportive without feeling rigid | Slightly more bounce than the plush models | Combo sleepers and back sleepers who like a buoyant surface | - |
| Julianna Hybrid | 4.2 | Best pressure relief of the four; comfortable “settle in” feel | Not as snappy as Alaina for fast repositioning | Side sleepers and mixed-position sleepers who want thicker comfort | - |
Testing team takeaways in one pass
In our notes, Alaina Hybrid felt like the most even “do-it-all” option—supportive, responsive, and easy to move on. Olivia Firm read as the most straightforward for lumbar steadiness. Sophia Pillow Top delivered the most obvious pressure relief for shoulders and hips, while Julianna Hybrid combined that softer comfort with better bounce than the pillow top, making it the most forgiving pick for people who start on their side and finish on their back.
Dutch Craft Mattress comparison chart
| Comparison item | Olivia Firm | Sophia Pillow Top | Alaina Hybrid | Julianna Hybrid |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collection | Comfort Response | Comfort Response | Comfort Response | Comfort Response |
| Mattress type (listed) | Pocketed coil build (pocket coils listed) | Pocketed coil build (pocket coils listed) | Hybrid | Hybrid |
| Comfort options (collection) | Firm/Plush/Pillow Top options listed for Olivia | Sophia PT listed in collection | - | - |
| Key comfort-layer callout (collection) | 1" gel infused memory foam | 2" high density cool gel | 2" high density gel flex | 4" high density gel flex |
| Thickness (verified) | 14" | 14" | - | - |
| Coil system (collection) | Heavy duty 768 pocketed coil | Heavy duty 768 pocketed coil | Heavy duty 768 pocketed coil | Heavy duty 768 pocketed coil |
| Edge support (verified/collection) | HD foam edge support listed | HD foam edge support listed | Foam-encased coil system listed | Foam-encased coil system listed |
| Cooling materials (verified/collection) | Gel infused cool memory foam listed | Gel infused cool memory foam listed | Gel flex listed | Gel flex listed |
| Support impression (test) | Firm-leaning, steady | Softer top, supportive core | Most balanced | Plush-leaning, still supportive |
| Pressure relief impression (test) | Moderate | High | High-moderate | Highest |
| Motion isolation impression (test) | Good | Best | Good | Very good |
| Responsiveness impression (test) | Moderate | Lower | Best | Good |
How we tested
I rotated these mattresses through the same routine: overnight sleep with back/side switching, extended edge sitting while putting on shoes, and repeated roll-and-return cycles to judge how quickly the surface reset. Marcus Reed (6'1", ~230 lbs) focused on hip support, heat buildup, and whether the bed felt like it sagged under his midsection. Jenna Brooks (5'7", ~160 lbs) and Ethan Cole (6'0", ~185–190 lbs) handled the motion isolation runs and the “easy to turn” check, then we scored Support, Cooling, Pressure Relief, Motion Isolation, Responsiveness, Edge Support, and Durability.
Dutch Craft Mattress: our testing experience
Comfort Response Olivia Firm
Our testing experience
I noticed Olivia Firm right away for how “tidy” it felt under my lower back—less of a sink, more of a guided, level platform. During long laptop sessions in bed, my hips didn’t slide forward, which usually shows up as next-day tightness for me. Marcus pushed it harder: he did his stomach-start routine, then rolled to his back, checking for any hammocking at the hips. His note was blunt: the center stayed supported, and the edge didn’t collapse when he sat to tie his shoes. Jenna and Ethan’s motion test (drop-in, get-out, and repositioning) showed movement, but it stayed controlled rather than jarring.
What we liked
-
Steady lumbar feel that stayed consistent through the night
-
Strong edge behavior for sitting and getting up
-
A more “on top” feel that made repositioning straightforward
Who it is best for
-
Back sleepers who want stable hip alignment
-
Combo sleepers who dislike deep sink
-
Anyone who spends time reading or working in bed
Where it falls short
-
Side sleepers who want a deeper cushion at the shoulder
-
People who prefer a slow, enveloping foam feel
Pros & cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Stable support and clean alignment feel | Less plush pressure relief than the softer models |
| Edge felt reliable for sitting and exit | Not the most damped surface for motion |
| Balanced, practical “everyday” comfort | Not a “sink-in” memory-foam style feel |
Details
-
Price: $810 (mattress & foundation listed together)
-
Firmness: Firm (model naming)
-
Available sizes (listed): Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King
-
Thickness: 14"
-
Comfort layers (listed): 2" quilt foam with natural F/R barrier; 1" gel infused cool memory foam; 1.5" HD support foam
-
Support core (listed): 8" 13.75-gauge, 7-turn pocket coils
-
Edge support (listed): HD foam edge support
-
Warranty: 15-year warranty listed
-
Shipping: -
-
Trial period: -
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4 | Held my hips level; Marcus didn’t report sag under load |
| Pressure Relief | 4.0 | Enough contouring for back sleep; less give at the shoulder on side |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Stayed comfortable; mild warmth buildup after long stretches |
| Motion Isolation | 4.1 | Controlled movement, but not fully muted |
| Responsiveness | 3.8 | Quicker than plush foam beds, not springy |
| Edge Support | 4.3 | Reliable for sitting and repeated exits |
| Durability | 4.2 | Build reads sturdy; long warranty supports the positioning |
| Overall | 4.1 | A practical, support-first option |
Comfort Response Sophia Pillow Top
Our testing experience
Sophia Pillow Top felt like the “exhale” bed in the set. The first night, I noticed the top layer compressing more under my shoulders, which helped me stay on my side longer without shifting. Jenna’s reaction was immediate: she could feel the surface absorbing movement instead of bouncing it back, especially when Ethan did his restless turn cycles. Ethan’s line—“it lets me turn without thinking about it”—showed up here, but with a caveat: if he rolled too close to the edge, he wanted a little more push-back before he reset. Marcus, meanwhile, was the reality check; he liked the comfort, but he flagged that his hips sank deeper than on Olivia or Alaina when he started on his stomach.
What we liked
-
Best pressure relief for shoulders and hips across the four
-
Strong motion damping for shared sleep
-
Plush feel without a “stuck” sensation during normal turns
Who it is best for
-
Side sleepers who feel shoulder or hip pressure on firmer beds
-
Couples who want a quieter surface
-
Back sleepers who like a cushioned top layer
Where it falls short
-
Heavier stomach sleepers who need firmer hip support
-
People who want a brisk, bouncy response
Pros & cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Plush pressure relief and gentle contour | Too soft for some stomach sleepers |
| Very good motion isolation feel | Less snappy than the hybrids |
| Comfortable for side-to-back transitions | Edge felt softer during drift-to-edge sleep |
Details
-
Price: $1,080 (mattress & foundation listed together)
-
Firmness: Pillow top feel (model naming)
-
Available sizes (listed): Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King
-
Thickness: 14"
-
Comfort layers (listed): 2" quilt foam with natural F/R barrier; 2" gel infused cool memory foam; 2" HD comfort foam
-
Support core (listed): 8" 13.75-gauge, 7-turn pocket coils
-
Edge support (listed): HD foam edge support
-
Warranty: 15-year warranty listed
-
Shipping: -
-
Trial period: -
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.1 | Supportive core, but more sink under heavier hips |
| Pressure Relief | 4.5 | Best joint comfort for side sleep in our notes |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Comfortable overall; gel layer helped it stay steady |
| Motion Isolation | 4.4 | Jenna and Ethan felt the least disturbance here |
| Responsiveness | 3.6 | Softer, slower rebound than the hybrids |
| Edge Support | 4.2 | Solid when sitting; softer when sleeping near the edge |
| Durability | 4.1 | Thick comfort stack can compress over time; still well built |
| Overall | 4.1 | The comfort-first pick for pressure relief and couples |
Comfort Response Alaina Hybrid
Our testing experience
Alaina Hybrid was the one I kept coming back to when I wanted the bed to “meet me halfway.” The surface had more spring-back than the pillow top, and that mattered on nights when I flipped between back and side. Marcus focused on whether it stayed flat under his hips when he rolled forward; he said the support felt immediate, and heat didn’t pool as quickly as it sometimes does in thicker foam builds. Jenna and Ethan ran the motion routine again, and while you can tell it’s a hybrid (a bit more energy on movement), it stayed predictable—no big ripple effect, just a small, localized response. This was also the easiest model for Ethan’s restless turning without feeling restricted.
What we liked
-
Best responsiveness for repositioning and combo sleep
-
Strong support feel without harsh firmness
-
Cooling felt steadier over long nights
Who it is best for
-
Combo sleepers who change positions often
-
Back sleepers who want buoyant support
-
Couples who want balance: some give, some push-back
Where it falls short
-
Shoppers who want the most muted motion
-
People who prefer a slow, deep memory-foam hug
Pros & cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Quick rebound and easy turning | Slightly more bounce than plush models |
| Balanced support for heavier sleepers | Not the most “dead quiet” surface |
| Felt cooler in longer sessions | Less of a pillow-top cushion |
Details
-
Price: -
-
Firmness: -
-
Available sizes (listed): Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, California King; split sizes also listed
-
Thickness: -
-
Mattress type (listed): Hybrid
-
Comfort-layer callout (listed): 2" High Density Gel Flex
-
Coil system (collection): Heavy duty 768 pocketed coil
-
Edge system (collection): Foam encased coil system
-
Warranty (collection/listed): 15-year non prorated
-
Shipping: -
-
Trial period: -
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.4 | Stable under load; strong midsection control in our notes |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Enough cushion for side starts without losing alignment |
| Cooling | 4.3 | Stayed more consistent across long nights |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Noticeable hybrid response, but localized |
| Responsiveness | 4.3 | Quickest turning and fastest reset |
| Edge Support | 4.3 | Foam-encased feel translated well in sit/edge tests |
| Durability | 4.2 | Construction signals long-haul intent; warranty aligns |
| Overall | 4.2 | The most even “all-around” performer in our set |
Comfort Response Julianna Hybrid
Our testing experience
Julianna Hybrid leaned more into comfort than Alaina, and I felt that the moment I settled in. The surface let my shoulders sink a bit deeper, but it didn’t feel sloppy; it was more like a thicker cushion with a supportive backstop underneath. Jenna preferred this over Alaina for winding down—less surface push-back, more ease. Ethan liked it too, but he noticed it wasn’t as instantly springy when he did fast position changes; he had to “commit” a fraction more before the mattress helped him over. Marcus gave the most nuanced feedback: for back sleep, he liked it; for stomach-start nights, he wanted the firmer, faster lift of Alaina.
What we liked
-
Best overall pressure relief among the hybrids
-
Comfortable for side-to-back transitions
-
Better motion damping than Alaina while staying responsive
Who it is best for
-
Side sleepers who still want hybrid support underneath
-
Couples who want cushion without feeling stuck
-
Back sleepers who prefer a softer top layer
Where it falls short
-
Stomach sleepers who need firmer hip lift
-
People who want the snappiest response for quick turning
Pros & cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Thick comfort feel with hybrid support | Less instantly springy than Alaina |
| Strong pressure relief without “stuck” foam | Stomach sleepers may prefer firmer options |
| Very good motion control for a hybrid | Softer top can feel less “tight” at the hips |
Details
-
Price: -
-
Firmness: -
-
Available sizes (listed): Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, California King; split sizes also listed
-
Thickness: -
-
Mattress type (listed): Hybrid
-
Comfort-layer callout (listed): 4" High Density Gel Flex
-
Coil system (collection): Heavy duty 768 pocketed coil
-
Edge system (collection): Foam encased coil system
-
Warranty (collection/listed): 15-year non prorated
-
Shipping: -
-
Trial period: -
Review score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2 | Supportive, but softer comfort reduces “lift” for some sleepers |
| Pressure Relief | 4.6 | Most forgiving at shoulders/hips in our notes |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Stayed comfortable; no major heat spikes noted |
| Motion Isolation | 4.3 | Better dampening than Alaina, still not foam-dead |
| Responsiveness | 4.0 | Easy enough to move, but not as snappy as Alaina |
| Edge Support | 4.2 | Solid perimeter feel; mild compression during edge drifting |
| Durability | 4.1 | Thicker comfort layer may show wear sooner under heavy use |
| Overall | 4.2 | The comfort-leaning hybrid that still stays controlled |
Performance scores side by side
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness | Edge Support |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comfort Response Olivia Firm | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.3 |
| Comfort Response Sophia Pillow Top | 4.1 | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 3.6 | 4.2 |
| Comfort Response Alaina Hybrid | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.3 |
| Comfort Response Julianna Hybrid | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.2 |
Numerically, Alaina Hybrid and Julianna Hybrid are the most evenly strong across categories, with Alaina winning the responsiveness battle and Julianna owning pressure relief. Sophia Pillow Top shows the clearest single advantage in motion isolation and cushioning comfort. Olivia Firm is the “support-first” baseline—less plush than Sophia, but the most straightforward for keeping hips level.
How to choose a Dutch Craft Mattress
If you want the safest all-around pick, start with Alaina Hybrid for balanced support and easy turning. Prioritize pressure relief and a softer top layer, and Sophia Pillow Top or Julianna Hybrid is the better lane. If you tend to sleep more on your back—or you want a firmer, more stable surface for long nights—Olivia Firm is the cleanest fit. For couples who wake easily, Sophia Pillow Top is the most consistently quiet in our motion tests.
Limitations to know before buying
Across these models, the biggest trade-off is selection complexity: retailer listings don’t always publish full layer breakdowns for every Comfort Response model, which makes side-by-side comparison harder. The plush options (Sophia Pillow Top and Julianna Hybrid) can also be a poor match for heavier stomach sleepers who need firm hip lift, while the firmer lane (Olivia Firm) may not cushion shoulders enough for sensitive side sleepers.
Dutch Craft Mattress vs alternatives
Why choose Dutch Craft: you’re drawn to a factory-built, retailer-sold lineup with a consistent pocketed-coil foundation and comfort-layer options that range from firm to pillow top, plus long warranty positioning. For shoppers who want a more widely standardized national option, the Saatva Classic is positioned as an innerspring mattress with a dual-coil design, which can suit people chasing a more traditional spring feel. For side sleepers who want a mainstream hybrid tuned for pressure relief, Helix positions the Helix Midnight as a medium-feel model designed for side sleepers.
Pro tips for Dutch Craft Mattress owners
-
Use a breathable mattress protector to keep the surface feel consistent while reducing heat buildup.
-
Rotate the mattress on a schedule that matches your body weight and sleep habits (more frequent if you tend to sleep in one spot).
-
If you’re a side sleeper on Olivia Firm, add a thin, breathable topper rather than replacing your pillow with extra height.
-
For pillow-top comfort models, keep your pillow loft moderate so your neck doesn’t tip upward when the shoulder sinks.
-
Do edge-sitting gradually at first if you’re coming from a very rigid perimeter; it helps you calibrate how the mattress behaves at the boundary.
-
If you share the bed, test your “worst case” motion scenario early—one person gets in/out while the other stays still—so you know what to expect.
-
Track morning back tightness for two weeks before changing anything; small adjustments (pillow height, sleep position) can matter.
-
If you sleep hot, switch to a lighter comforter and breathable sheets before assuming the mattress is the core issue.
-
Keep the foundation/base setup consistent with how you tested it; mismatched support underneath can change feel quickly.
FAQs
Q: Which model felt best for side-sleep pressure relief?
A: Sophia Pillow Top and Julianna Hybrid relieved the most shoulder/hip pressure in our notes.
Q: Which one was easiest to move around on?
A: Alaina Hybrid reset the fastest and felt the most responsive during turning.
Q: Which is the safest pick for back support?
A: Olivia Firm and Alaina Hybrid both held hips level well; Olivia felt the most straightforwardly firm.