Dilworth Mattress leans into durable, supportive builds—mostly two-sided innerspring models, plus a firmer Talalay latex option—for sleepers who want a traditional, steady feel. In our testing, the Eastover Ultra delivered the most locked-in support, while Blue Heaven felt the springiest and stayed the coolest. If you prefer a deep foam hug or very muted partner movement, these beds can feel a little lively.
Table of Contents
- Product Overview
- Testing Team Takeaways
- Dilworth Mattress Comparison Chart
- How We Tested It
- Dilworth Mattress: Our Testing Experience
- Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
- How to Choose the Dilworth Mattress?
- Limitations
- Dilworth Mattress Vs. Alternatives
- Pro Tips for Dilworth Mattress
- FAQs
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastover Anniversary Mattress | 4.2 | Firm support; strong edges; consistent feel | So-so motion isolation; minimal foam hug | Back sleepers, combo sleepers who like a firmer bed |
| Eastover Supreme Mattress | 4.1 | More cushioning than firmer Eastovers; still supportive | Runs a bit warmer; movement is easier to feel | Side/back combo sleepers who want cushion without deep sink |
| Eastover Ultra Mattress | 4.3 | Strongest support; best edge stability | May feel too rigid for lighter side sleepers | Stomach/back sleepers, heavier bodies, anyone who hates softness |
| Blue Heaven Latex Mattress | 4.4 | Very responsive; cool, buoyant pressure relief | Edges compress more than innersprings | Hot sleepers, combo sleepers, latex fans who want firm lift |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across all four models, what stood out was how stable and “long-haul” the builds felt—especially the flip-friendly Eastover line. Marcus (6'1", ~230 lbs) rated the Ultra highest for its no-hammock support. Mia (5'4", ~125 lbs) preferred the Supreme when she wanted shoulder comfort without a mushy surface. Carlos (5'11", ~175 lbs) saw the Anniversary as the safest pick for clean alignment and consistent firmness.
Dilworth Mattress Comparison Chart
| Feature | Eastover Anniversary Mattress | Eastover Supreme Mattress | Eastover Ultra Mattress | Blue Heaven Latex Mattress |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Innerspring | Innerspring | Innerspring | Latex + base foam |
| Intended feel | Firm, comfortable support | Plush comfort with support | Extra-firm, most rigid option | Firm Talalay latex core feel |
| Two-sided sleep surface | Yes | Yes | Yes | - |
| Support core | Premium innersprings + side supports | Innersprings + added supports | Innersprings + additional supports | 6 in Talalay latex + 3.5 in base foam |
| Cushioning | Firm, high-resilience cushioning | Soft, high-resilience cushioning | Firm, high-resilience cushioning | Talalay latex comfort + supportive base |
| Cover notes | Damask cover quilted to Quilt Flex | Damask cover quilted to Quilt Flex | Damask cover quilted to slim Quilt Flex | 6-way stretch cover |
| Cooling in our tests | Good airflow, neutral-to-cool | Neutral (plusher top held more heat) | Coolest of the Eastovers (in our tests) | Cool and breathable |
| Motion isolation in our tests | Moderate | Moderate to low | Moderate | Good (but bouncy) |
| Responsiveness in our tests | High | Medium-high | High | Very high |
| Edge support in our tests | Strong | Strong | Strongest | Moderate |
How We Tested It
We rotated nightly sleep trials and ran repeatable checks for support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability. I tracked lumbar comfort after long desk days. Marcus stress-tested hip support and heat buildup during long, still stretches. Mia focused on shoulder/hip pressure during extended side sleeping, and Carlos looked for mid-back fatigue and clean alignment during back-sleep sessions. We also repeated edge-sit and movement drills to keep scoring consistent.
Dilworth Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Eastover Anniversary Mattress
Our Testing Experience
The Anniversary sat right in the middle of the lineup: firm, but not harsh. On my back, my hips stayed level instead of dipping. When I rolled to my side, I got support without the “stuck-in-foam” sensation. Marcus went looking for sag under his hips and didn’t find it, even during long, still stretches. Mia wanted a bit more shoulder give, but she liked that the surface didn’t pull her neck out of line when she switched sides. Carlos described the transition into the support core as “clean”—no sudden drop, just steady resistance.
What we liked:
-
Steady hip and lumbar alignment for back and combo sleeping
-
Strong edges for sitting and stretching out near the perimeter
-
Consistent firmness night after night
Who it is best for:
-
Back sleepers and combo sleepers who want firm comfort
-
Anyone who uses the edge to get dressed or put on shoes
-
Sleepers who dislike deep foam sink
Where it falls short:
-
Partner movement is more noticeable than on slow-moving foam beds
-
Lightweight side sleepers may want more shoulder cushion
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Firm, balanced support; strong edges; predictable feel | Motion isolation is only moderate; not a deep, plush cradle |
Details
-
Firmness (our take): Firm
-
Type: Innerspring
-
Construction: top-tier innersprings with added side supports
-
Cushioning: premium firm, high-resilience cushioning
-
Cover: durable damask cover quilted to Quilt Flex
-
Two-sided design: Yes
-
Shipping/Delivery: White glove delivery with setup and old-mattress removal
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.6 | Keeps hips level; limits hammocking |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Airflow stayed comfortable in typical rooms |
| Pressure Relief | 4.0 | Enough cushion, but not a deep cradle |
| Motion Isolation | 3.7 | Movement is noticeable vs foam-forward beds |
| Responsiveness | 4.3 | Easy turning; no stuck feeling |
| Edge Support | 4.4 | Strong edge sit; usable perimeter |
| Durability | 4.5 | Two-sided design helped it stay consistent |
| Overall | 4.2 | A firm, alignment-first all-rounder |
Eastover Supreme Mattress
Our Testing Experience
The Supreme is the most forgiving Eastover. I noticed it while reading in bed: my shoulders settled in a bit more, but my lower back still felt held up instead of floating. Mia was the biggest fan—on her side, shoulder pressure built more slowly and she didn’t have to keep shifting her arm. Marcus liked the structure, but he called the top a little warmer than the firmer Eastovers after a long stretch. Carlos liked the steady base when he rolled, though the plusher surface made partner movement easier to detect.
What we liked:
-
More shoulder/hip comfort than the firmer Eastovers
-
Supportive enough for combo sleeping without deep sink
-
Strong edges for sitting and sleeping near the perimeter
Who it is best for:
-
Side/back combo sleepers who want cushion without losing support
-
People who dislike the slow, enveloping feel of memory foam
-
Average-weight sleepers who want a plusher-feeling innerspring
Where it falls short:
-
Hot sleepers may prefer a firmer, less plush surface
-
Motion isolation is not its strong suit
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Best pressure relief in the Eastover line; still supportive; strong edges | Runs a bit warmer; motion isolation is only moderate |
Details
-
Firmness (our take): Medium-firm to medium (plush-leaning)
-
Type: Innerspring
-
Construction: superior innersprings with additional support elements
-
Cushioning: top-tier, soft, high-resilience cushioning
-
Cover: durable damask cover quilted to Quilt Flex
-
Two-sided design: Yes
-
Shipping/Delivery: White glove delivery with setup and old-mattress removal
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.3 | Strong support, but less locked-in than the Ultra |
| Cooling | 3.8 | Plusher top held more heat during still sleep |
| Pressure Relief | 4.4 | Best shoulder comfort among the Eastovers |
| Motion Isolation | 3.6 | Movement transfer is noticeable |
| Responsiveness | 4.0 | Easy turns, though not as snappy as latex |
| Edge Support | 4.3 | Solid edge sit; stable perimeter |
| Durability | 4.4 | Two-sided build stayed consistent |
| Overall | 4.1 | Best pressure relief in the Eastover line, with trade-offs in cooling and motion control |
Eastover Ultra Mattress
Our Testing Experience
The Ultra is unapologetically extra-firm. From the first night, it felt like it was there to keep me flat and aligned, not to cushion. For my mild lower-back tightness, that was helpful: my pelvis didn’t dip, and my spine stayed stacked when I stayed on my back. Marcus loved that it stopped the hip sag he gets on softer beds. Mia could handle short stretches on her side, but her shoulder wanted more give after a while. Carlos called it the most “clinical” of the group—in the best way—because the surface stays consistent, so you always know what you’re getting.
What we liked:
-
The most stable, firm surface for alignment
-
Excellent edge support and full usable sleep space
-
Easy repositioning with no foam drag
Who it is best for:
-
Back and stomach sleepers who want flat, firm support
-
Heavier sleepers who compress softer tops quickly
-
Anyone who wants a very firm feel
Where it falls short:
-
Lightweight side sleepers may feel pressure at shoulders/hips
-
Not for shoppers chasing a plush pillow-top feel
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strongest support and edges; consistent feel; easy turning | Too firm for many side sleepers; motion isolation is only moderate |
Details
-
Firmness (our take): Extra-firm
-
Type: Innerspring
-
Construction: superior-grade innersprings fortified with additional supports
-
Cushioning: firm, high-resilience cushioning
-
Cover: durable damask cover quilted to a slim layer of Quilt Flex
-
Two-sided design: Yes
-
Shipping/Delivery: White glove delivery with setup and old-mattress removal
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.8 | Most stable alignment across body types |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Firm surface and airflow felt consistently cool |
| Pressure Relief | 3.6 | Limited give for shoulders and outer hips |
| Motion Isolation | 3.8 | Noticeable, though better than older springs |
| Responsiveness | 4.6 | Very easy turning and position changes |
| Edge Support | 4.7 | Best edge sit and perimeter stability |
| Durability | 4.7 | Rigid, two-sided build stayed consistent |
| Overall | 4.3 | A support specialist with predictable trade-offs |
Blue Heaven Latex Mattress
Our Testing Experience
Blue Heaven feels different right away: it’s firm, but it has that latex lift that keeps you on top instead of letting you sink. I liked it most on nights when I wanted support without the board-like rigidity of the Ultra. My lower back stayed comfortable, and the spring kept my hips from feeling pinned. Mia felt the firmness, but her shoulder held up better than on the Ultra. Marcus noticed the bounce immediately—easy to move on, but you feel the pushback more than on the Eastovers. Carlos liked how quickly it snapped back after movement: no lag, just an instant reset.
What we liked:
-
Very buoyant, responsive feel that makes turning effortless
-
Cooler than the plushest innerspring option in our room tests
-
Firm support without the board sensation
Who it is best for:
-
Hot sleepers and anyone who dislikes slow foam sink
-
Combo sleepers who change positions often
-
Latex fans who want firm, springy support
Where it falls short:
-
Edges compress more than on the Eastover innersprings
-
If you need ultra-muted motion, latex bounce may be a deal-breaker
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Instant responsiveness; cool, buoyant comfort; firm support | Edges compress more; bouncier feel can transfer movement |
Details
-
Firmness (our take): Firm
-
Type: Talalay latex + base foam
-
Construction: 6 inches Talalay latex + 3.5 inches high-density base foam
-
Cover: advanced 6-way stretch design
-
Two-sided design: -
-
Shipping/Delivery: White glove delivery with setup and old-mattress removal
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.5 | Firm lift helps keep hips from dipping |
| Cooling | 4.4 | Breathable feel with less heat buildup |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Good distribution without deep sink |
| Motion Isolation | 4.1 | Better than expected, but still bouncy |
| Responsiveness | 4.7 | Instant recovery and effortless turning |
| Edge Support | 4.0 | Comfortable, but more perimeter compression |
| Durability | 4.6 | Held its feel well over weeks |
| Overall | 4.4 | Best for hot, active sleepers who want firm, springy comfort |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eastover Anniversary Mattress | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 4.3 |
| Eastover Supreme Mattress | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 4.4 | 4.0 |
| Eastover Ultra Mattress | 4.3 | 4.8 | 3.6 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.7 | 4.6 |
| Blue Heaven Latex Mattress | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 4.7 |
Blue Heaven scores the most evenly for sleepers who want cooling plus easy movement, while the Ultra concentrates its advantage in pure support and long-term stability. The Anniversary stays balanced as a firm all-rounder. The Supreme leads the Eastover line on pressure relief, with trade-offs in cooling and motion isolation.
How to Choose the Dilworth Mattress?
Start with your sleep position and how you react to firmness:
-
Mostly back or stomach, and you hate sink: Eastover Ultra.
-
Want firm support that still feels approachable: Eastover Anniversary.
-
Need more cushion without a deep foam hug: Eastover Supreme.
-
Sleep hot, move a lot, and like buoyant lift: Blue Heaven.
Limitations
These models lean supportive and responsive, so sleepers chasing a slow, cradling memory-foam hug may find them too springy. Motion control is generally middle-of-the-road—better than old-school spring beds, but not the quietest choice for very light sleepers who wake easily. The Ultra can feel overly rigid for lightweight side sleepers, and Blue Heaven’s bounce won’t suit anyone who prefers a dampened, low-rebound surface.
Dilworth Mattress Vs. Alternatives
Why you might choose these models:
-
Alternatives to consider (see our mattress reviews for more options):
-
You prefer a responsive surface that’s easy to move on.
-
You rely on sturdy edge support for daily sitting and a usable perimeter.
Alternatives to consider:
-
Saatva Classic: a more traditional luxury feel with multiple firmness options.
-
WinkBed: strong support with a slightly plusher top feel.
-
Avocado Green: a different take on latex-forward construction.
Pro Tips for Dilworth Mattress
-
Keep a consistent baseline: use the same pillow and bedding during the first week.
-
For Eastover models, rotate and flip on a schedule so both sleep surfaces wear evenly.
-
Side sleeper on a firmer model? Try a slightly higher-loft pillow to keep your neck level.
-
Hot sleeper: use breathable sheets—heavy comforters can mask the mattress’s airflow advantages.
-
If you sit on the edge every day, add a small bench nearby to reduce repetitive edge compression.
-
If the Ultra feels too firm at the shoulder, a thin, soft topper can add cushion without changing the whole mattress.
-
For couples sensitive to movement, heavier bedding and a sturdy foundation can help reduce shared vibration.
FAQs
Which model felt the firmest in real sleep?
The Eastover Ultra—it stayed the flattest and most rigid all night.
Which one was easiest to move on?
Blue Heaven. The latex rebound made turning feel effortless.
If I’m a side sleeper, which is the safest pick?
Eastover Supreme was the most shoulder-friendly balance in our testing.
Which slept coolest overall?
Blue Heaven, followed by the Eastover Ultra in our room-temperature trials.
