Amada Mattress models are budget-friendly, all-foam “mattress-in-a-box” options that lean into cooling covers and gel-infused foams, aiming for a medium to medium-firm feel. In our testing, the best strengths were pressure relief and motion isolation, while the main trade-offs were edge stability and a slower, foam-forward response. They fit most back and side sleepers, but not everyone.
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amada Graphene Cooling Memory Foam Mattress (10-inch) | 4.0 | Cool-to-the-touch cover feel; stable support; quiet sleep surface | Edge feels softer; slower rebound | Back sleepers and couples wanting low motion transfer |
| AMADA HOMEFURNISHING Memory Foam Mattress (12-inch, Medium-Firm Plus) | 4.1 | Stronger mid-body support; balanced pressure relief; steady temperature | Firmer than it looks; foam response is measured | Combo sleepers who want a medium-firm baseline |
| Amada Memory Foam Mattress (12-inch, Bamboo Charcoal + Gel) | 4.2 | Very strong pressure relief; excellent motion isolation; washable cover | “Hug” feel can slow turning | Side sleepers and light sleepers sensitive to movement |
| Amada Memory Foam Mattress (14-inch, Graphene + Gel + Egg-Crate Airflow) | 4.2 | Deep cushioning; best motion isolation; comfortable for longer lounge sessions | Bulkier feel; edge support still average | Couples and side sleepers who like a deeper cradle |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across four Amada Mattress builds, we liked the consistent quiet, low-motion feel and the way the comfort foams took the edge off pressure points. Marcus pushed on heat and hip support and preferred the firmer 12-inch build; Mia favored the charcoal-and-gel 12-inch for shoulder comfort; Jenna and Ethan consistently called out how well these mattresses muted partner movement. The main drawback was predictable: sitting and sleeping near the edge felt less reinforced than premium foam beds.
Amada Mattress Comparison Chart
| Feature | Amada Graphene Cooling Memory Foam (10-inch) | Amada Memory Foam (12-inch, Medium-Firm Plus) | Amada Memory Foam (12-inch, Bamboo Charcoal + Gel) | Amada Memory Foam (14-inch, Graphene + Gel + Egg-Crate) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Memory foam | Memory foam | Memory foam | Memory foam |
| Feel (listed) | Medium-firm plus | Medium-firm plus | Medium-firm | Medium feel |
| Key comfort materials | Gel-infused foam; wave-cut layer | Gel-infused foam; wave-cut layer | Bamboo charcoal foam; gel memory foam | Gel foam; airflow egg-crate layer |
| Cover emphasis | Graphene fabric | Graphene fabric | Graphene cooling fabric + knit cover | Graphene-infused cover |
| Fiberglass-free (listed) | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Certifications mentioned | CertiPUR-US | CertiPUR-US | CertiPUR-US; OEKO-TEX cover | - |
| Notable test strength | Motion isolation | Support balance | Pressure relief | Motion isolation + deep cushion |
| Notable test weakness | Edge support | Responsiveness | Responsiveness | Edge support |
Reference details for the four models are shown here.
How We Tested It
We rotated the mattresses through the same bedrooms and routines: full nights of sleep, short naps, and long “wind-down” sessions reading and working on a laptop. We scored Support, Cooling, Pressure Relief, Motion Isolation, Responsiveness, Edge Support, and Durability based on repeatable checks: alignment on back and side, heat build-up after an hour, partner movement disruption, ease of turning, edge sit/stand stability, and how the foams changed after continued use.
Amada Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Amada Graphene Cooling Memory Foam Mattress (10-inch)
Our Testing Experience
I noticed the surface feel right away: it had that slightly cool hand-feel you get from a more technical cover, and the bed settled into a steady, medium-firm posture once my hips and shoulders found their spots. Marcus immediately tried to “break” it by sleeping partly stomach-down after starting on his side; it held him up well enough that he didn’t complain about hammocking. Jenna and Ethan kept calling it “quiet”—the kind of bed where one person can get up and the other doesn’t pop awake.
What we liked
-
Stable midsection support for back sleeping
-
Very low motion transfer in normal partner movement
-
Consistent feel night to night
Who it is best for
-
Back sleepers who want a medium-firm baseline
-
Couples who prioritize a calmer surface
-
People who dislike springy bounce
Where it falls short
-
Softer edge feel when sitting to put on shoes
-
Turning has a slower, foam-style “reset”
-
Side sleepers may want more shoulder give
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong motion isolation | Edge support is average |
| Cool-to-the-touch cover feel | Slower response for frequent turning |
| Supportive for back sleeping | Not the plushest for shoulders |
Details
-
Construction: memory foam
-
Cover: graphene fabric (listed)
-
Comfort components: gel-infused foam and a wave-cut layer (listed)
-
Feel: medium-firm plus (listed)
-
Certifications: CertiPUR-US (listed)
-
Fiberglass-free: yes (listed)
-
Trial/support: 100-night trial; 10-year support (listed)
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.3 | Keeps hips from sinking too far, especially on back sleep |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Cover and airflow-oriented layers stayed comfortable |
| Pressure Relief | 3.8 | Fine for most, but lighter side sleepers wanted more give |
| Motion Isolation | 4.4 | Partner movement muted well in our nightly routines |
| Responsiveness | 3.6 | Turning feels a touch slow as foams re-expand |
| Edge Support | 3.5 | Secure enough for sleeping, less so for sitting |
| Durability | 3.9 | Foams held shape consistently through continued use |
| Overall | 4.0 | Best as a steady, low-motion, medium-firm foam option |
AMADA HOMEFURNISHING Memory Foam Mattress (12-inch, Medium-Firm Plus)
Our Testing Experience
This was the “holds-you-up” version in our lineup. On my first night, I could feel the transition from the comfort layer into a more supportive core sooner, and that helped my lower back feel less tight in the morning. Marcus liked it because it didn’t let his hips drop when he rolled forward. Mia respected the support but said the shoulder area felt firmer than she wanted unless she used a slightly thicker pillow to keep her neck neutral.
What we liked
-
The most consistent lumbar/hip support of the group
-
Balanced comfort without feeling mushy
-
Temperature stayed steady even on longer nights
Who it is best for
-
Back sleepers and combo sleepers who rotate positions
-
Heavier bodies needing firmer anti-sag support
-
People who dislike a deep “hug” feel
Where it falls short
-
Can feel firm for lightweight side sleepers
-
Bounce is limited; it’s still a foam mattress
-
Edges don’t feel reinforced like a premium hybrid
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Stronger support profile | Too firm for some side sleepers |
| Airflow-oriented foam layer design | Limited bounce |
| Stable feel over time | Edge support remains average |
Details
-
Construction: memory foam
-
Comfort/support components: gel-infused foam; wave-cut foam; support foam (listed)
-
Cover: graphene fabric cover (listed)
-
Feel: medium-firm plus (listed)
-
High-density foam: 3 lbs high-density foam (listed)
-
Fiberglass-free: yes (listed)
-
Certifications: CertiPUR-US (listed)
-
Model number: MSMA03G-Q12-US (listed)
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.6 | Best spinal alignment feedback across back and combo sleep |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Airflow-oriented design kept heat manageable |
| Pressure Relief | 4.0 | Good overall, but shoulders may want more plushness |
| Motion Isolation | 4.3 | Partner movement stayed muted |
| Responsiveness | 3.7 | Easier to move than softer foams, still not springy |
| Edge Support | 3.7 | Slightly steadier than softer builds, still not “reinforced” |
| Durability | 4.0 | Held posture well through repeated weeks |
| Overall | 4.1 | A more supportive take on a cooling foam mattress |
Amada Memory Foam Mattress (12-inch, Bamboo Charcoal + Gel)
Our Testing Experience
This was the mattress that made Mia relax her shoulders almost immediately. When she side-slept curled slightly, the top layers let her shoulder sink without that “jammed-up joint” feeling. For me, the comfort was obvious while reading in bed—the surface softened under my hips, but not to the point that my lower back felt unsupported. Jenna and Ethan had the same refrain: it stayed calm even when Ethan shifted positions repeatedly. The trade-off was that slower foam rebound; it felt more like a gentle cradle than a quick-responding bed.
What we liked
-
Excellent pressure relief around shoulders and outer hips
-
Very strong motion isolation for couples
-
Washable cover made upkeep simpler in practice
Who it is best for
-
Side sleepers needing joint-friendly cushioning
-
Light sleepers who wake easily from partner movement
-
People who like a noticeable contouring feel
Where it falls short
-
Turning can feel slower for restless sleepers
-
Edge sits softer than it looks
-
Stomach sleepers may want a firmer surface
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Best pressure relief in the set | Slower responsiveness |
| Outstanding motion isolation | Softer edge feel |
| Washable removable cover | Not ideal for strict stomach sleepers |
Details
-
Construction: memory foam
-
Number of layers: 3 (listed)
-
Fill materials: bamboo charcoal foam; gel memory foam; high-density support foam (listed)
-
Cover/top style: graphene fabric with bamboo fiber blend; breathable knit cover (listed)
-
Feel: medium firm (listed)
-
Special features: bamboo charcoal infused; cooling gel; pressure relief; removable cover; fiberglass-free (listed)
-
Certifications: CertiPUR-US foam; OEKO-TEX certified cover (listed)
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2 | Supportive enough for back/side, not the firmest option |
| Cooling | 4.2 | Cover and gel helped keep the surface comfortable |
| Pressure Relief | 4.6 | Most joint-friendly feel for side sleeping |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | Best “don’t feel your partner” performance we saw |
| Responsiveness | 3.5 | Noticeably slower rebound than the firmer build |
| Edge Support | 3.6 | Fine for sleeping near edge; sitting still compresses |
| Durability | 3.9 | Comfort layers stayed consistent across repeat nights |
| Overall | 4.2 | The comfort pick for side sleepers and light sleepers |
Amada Memory Foam Mattress (14-inch, Graphene + Gel + Egg-Crate Airflow)
Our Testing Experience
This was the “deep cushion” experience. The first thing I noticed was that it made longer wind-down sessions easier; my hips felt buffered even after an hour of reading. Marcus liked the support but said he could feel more sink before the mattress pushed back compared with the firmer 12-inch build. Jenna and Ethan both slept more “together but separate” on it—movement stayed quiet, and the thicker profile seemed to dampen small shifts even more. The overall sensation was plush-leaning on top with a slower foam cadence.
What we liked
-
Deep, comfortable cushioning for side sleeping and lounging
-
Best overall motion isolation in shared sleep
-
Temperature stayed controlled despite the thicker profile
Who it is best for
-
Couples who want maximum motion reduction
-
Side sleepers who want deeper cushioning
-
People who spend time reading or watching TV in bed
Where it falls short
-
Bulkier foam feel; not for people who want bounce
-
Edge sitting still compresses noticeably
-
Very restless sleepers may want quicker response
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Deep cushioning comfort | Less responsive for frequent turning |
| Excellent motion isolation | Edge support is still average |
| Cooling-focused cover and airflow layer | Heavier, bulkier feel |
Details
-
Thickness: 14 inches (listed)
-
Dimensions (King): 79.13" L x 59.45" W x 14" thick (listed)
-
Cooling components: graphene-infused cover; gel-infused comfort; airflow egg-crate layer (listed)
-
Pressure-relief design: triple-layer support concept (listed)
-
Fiberglass-free: yes (listed)
-
Price observed: $505.99 (listed)
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2 | Supportive once settled, with a deeper initial sink |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Cooling elements helped offset the thicker profile |
| Pressure Relief | 4.6 | Deepest cushion for shoulders and hips |
| Motion Isolation | 4.7 | Most “still” feel when a partner moved |
| Responsiveness | 3.4 | Slowest “reset” feel among the four |
| Edge Support | 3.6 | Sleeping near edge was fine; sitting compressed |
| Durability | 4.0 | Thick build held comfort well through continued use |
| Overall | 4.2 | Best for deep comfort and shared-sleep calm |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amada Graphene Cooling Memory Foam (10-inch) | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 3.9 | 3.6 |
| Amada Memory Foam (12-inch, Medium-Firm Plus) | 4.1 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 3.7 |
| Amada Memory Foam (12-inch, Bamboo Charcoal + Gel) | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 3.5 |
| Amada Memory Foam (14-inch, Graphene + Gel + Egg-Crate) | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.0 | 4.7 | 4.0 | 3.4 |
The most evenly balanced option was the 12-inch medium-firm-plus build, which avoided extremes while leading on Support. The two “comfort-forward” standouts were the 12-inch bamboo charcoal + gel and the 14-inch build, both topping Pressure Relief and Motion Isolation, but giving up some Responsiveness. The 10-inch model stayed competitive overall, with its main weakness being edge stability and shoulder plushness.
How to Choose the Amada Mattress?
Choose based on sleep position and how much “hug” you like. If you’re a back or combo sleeper who wants steadier alignment, start with the 12-inch medium-firm-plus build. If you’re a lightweight side sleeper or wake easily, the 12-inch bamboo charcoal + gel version is the comfort-first pick. For couples who want the calmest shared surface and deeper cushioning, the 14-inch build is the safest bet.
Limitations
These are foam-forward mattresses, so none deliver the quick, springy response of a hybrid. Edge support is consistently average, which matters if you sit on the edge often or sleep right on the perimeter. Lightweight side sleepers may find the firmer 12-inch build too rigid, while very restless sleepers may find the 12-inch charcoal and 14-inch builds a bit slow to “let go.”
Amada Mattress Vs. Alternatives
Why choose these models
-
Cooling-focused covers and gel foams can feel more comfortable over long nights
-
Strong motion isolation makes them workable for couples and light sleepers
-
Simple all-foam construction keeps the feel predictable and quiet
Alternatives to consider
-
Classic Brands Cool Gel: for a more established “cool gel memory foam” category option
-
Novilla Gel Memory Foam: for shoppers comparing similar cooling foam beds at common online price points
-
Zinus Green Tea Memory Foam: for a widely available all-foam baseline with a different comfort signature
Pro Tips for Amada Mattress
-
Give the mattress a full expansion window before judging firmness; foam feel stabilizes after it fully opens up.
-
Use a breathable mattress protector if you sleep hot; it preserves the cooling feel of the cover without trapping as much heat.
-
If you’re a side sleeper with shoulder sensitivity, pair the softer models with a slightly higher-loft pillow to keep your neck neutral.
-
For back sleepers, try a thin pillow under the knees to reduce morning lower-back tightness.
-
If you sit on the edge daily, use a sturdy bed frame and avoid “perching” on the same spot every time.
-
Rotate the mattress periodically to keep wear more even across the comfort layers.
-
If you feel “stuck,” use smoother sheets and focus on models with a firmer support baseline.
-
Keep the room temperature and bedding consistent when comparing mattresses; cooling impressions change quickly with linens.
-
Certifications like CertiPUR-US indicate foam standards related to content and emissions, but comfort still comes down to your body and sleep style.
FAQs
Does the Amada Mattress feel more “on top” or “in” the bed?
The firmer 12-inch build tends to feel more “on top,” while the 12-inch charcoal and 14-inch versions feel more “in,” with a deeper cradle around hips and shoulders.
How good is motion isolation for couples?
Across the lineup, motion isolation was consistently strong. In our couple tests, Jenna and Ethan noticed fewer wake-ups from routine turning and getting in and out of bed, especially on the 12-inch charcoal and 14-inch builds.
Is edge support strong enough for sitting?
It’s adequate, not exceptional. Sleeping near the edge felt fine, but sitting to put on shoes compressed the foams more than a typical hybrid or reinforced-edge design.
Will hot sleepers actually feel cooler?
The cooling-oriented covers and gel layers helped, but they don’t eliminate heat entirely. If you run hot like Marcus, breathable sheets and a protector that doesn’t trap warmth make a noticeable difference.