AC Pacific Mattress offerings lean practical: straightforward foam and spring builds aimed at guest rooms, first apartments, and budget-friendly primary beds. We focused on support, cooling, pressure relief, motion isolation, responsiveness, edge support, and durability to map out which models feel balanced versus specialized. The lineup shines when you want simple comfort without fuss, but the thinner spring option especially has clear trade-offs.
Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viscogel | 4.0 | Strong motion isolation; pressure-relieving cradle; stable, consistent feel | Slower response; edges feel softer than coil options | Side/back sleepers who want a quieter, more “hugging” surface |
| Herbalfusion | 3.9 | Even balance of contour and support; predictable medium feel; good all-around comfort | Not the most responsive; edge sit feels less firm than springs | Mixed-position sleepers who want a classic memory-foam feel without extremes |
| Herbacoal-12 | 3.8 | Deep cushion; excellent pressure relief; very low partner disturbance | More sink for heavier sleepers; slower “reset” when changing positions | Pressure-sensitive side sleepers and anyone who likes a plusher foam depth |
| Bed-618 | 3.7 | Responsive, springy feel; supportive for short stays; more stable edge sit | More motion transfer; thinner profile can feel firm at shoulders/hips | Guest rooms, kids/teens, and sleepers who prefer a traditional spring bounce |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the week, we agreed the foam models (Viscogel, Herbalfusion, Herbacoal-12) were the safest picks for motion isolation and joint comfort—Mia stayed happiest on the deeper foams, while Carlos cared most about how evenly the lumbar stayed lifted. Marcus consistently favored the models that stayed less “stuffy” overnight. Bed-618 surprised us with lively support for the price-minded use case, but it was also the quickest to reveal pressure points and partner movement.
AC Pacific Mattress Comparison Chart
| Comparison Item | Viscogel | Herbalfusion | Herbacoal-12 | Bed-618 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Memory foam | Memory foam | Memory foam | Bonnell spring |
| Thickness options | 8", 10" | 8", 10" | 12" | 6" |
| Firmness (listed) | - | Medium | - | Medium |
| Available sizes (listed) | Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, California King, Eastern King | Twin, Full, Queen, California King, Eastern King | Full, Queen, California King, Eastern King | Twin, Full |
| Notable materials/features | Gel beads infused; memory foam cradle | Green tea infusion; layered foam | Green tea + charcoal infusion | Interconnected coil design; breathable fabric |
| Cooling (testing) | Above average for foam | Average for foam | Average for thicker foam | Best airflow of the four |
| Motion isolation (testing) | Excellent | Very good | Excellent | Fair |
| Responsiveness (testing) | Moderate-slow | Moderate-slow | Slow | Fast |
| Edge support (testing) | Moderate | Moderate | Moderate-soft | Moderate-firm |
| Pressure relief (testing) | High | High | Highest | Lower |
How We Tested It
We rotated through each AC Pacific Mattress model using the same nightly routine: 30-minute wind-down reading, full-night sleep, and a short morning edge-sit check. Support was judged by hip and lumbar alignment (especially for Carlos), while cooling was tracked by heat buildup after 20–30 minutes under a comforter (Marcus). Pressure relief came from side-sleep shoulder/hip checks (Mia). We also used a standardized partner-disturbance simulation for motion isolation, plus repeated roll/turn cycles for responsiveness, and perimeter sit/slide tests for edge support.
AC Pacific Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Viscogel
Our Testing Experience
The first night on Viscogel, I noticed the surface settling in under my hips with a slow, steady melt—more “sink into a pocket” than “float on top.” Carlos spent extra time lying flat and doing micro-adjustments, and he kept coming back to how even his mid-back felt when the mattress finished settling. Marcus paid attention to heat buildup; the feel stayed less swampy than many foams we’ve tried, especially after the first hour. Mia’s shoulder test was the tell: she sank in enough to relax without her neck feeling twisted.
What we liked
- Quiet, deadened feel with excellent motion isolation
- Consistent contouring that kept my hips from drifting out of line
- Less heat buildup than expected from a foam surface
Who it is best for
- Side sleepers who want shoulder/hip relief without “bottoming out”
- Light-to-average weight couples sensitive to movement
- Back sleepers who prefer a gentle cradle over bounce
Where it falls short
- Slower to respond when you change positions quickly
- Edge sit feels softer than spring-based options
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong motion isolation; pressure-relieving contour; gel-infused design | Moderate edge support; slower response than coils |
Details
- Type: Memory foam.
- Notable feature: Gel beads infused to help regulate sleeping temperature.
- Thickness options: 8", 10".
- Available sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, California King, Eastern King.
- Foundation options: Yes or No.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.0 | Stable spine feel once the foam settles under the hips. |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Less heat buildup than typical foam in our overnight checks. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3 | Mia’s shoulder/hip comfort stayed consistent across long side-sleep blocks. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | Partner-disturbance simulation barely traveled beyond a hand’s width. |
| Responsiveness | 3.4 | Comfortable, but slower to “reset” after rollovers. |
| Edge Support | 3.5 | Edge sit is usable, though it compresses more than springs. |
| Durability | 3.8 | Even support feel, but softer edges suggest mindful use over time. |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Best blend of pressure relief and low disturbance in the group. |
Herbalfusion
Our Testing Experience
Herbalfusion felt like the most “middle of the road” in a good way. When I laid down, my lower back didn’t feel perched, but I also didn’t feel swallowed. Carlos liked the transition from the top comfort into support—it felt predictable when he rolled from back to side. Marcus still tested for heat, and while it didn’t feel actively cool, it avoided that trapped warmth sensation for the first part of the night. Mia described it as comfortable without being squishy; her shoulder sank in, but she didn’t feel like she had to fight to change sides.
What we liked
- Balanced medium feel that worked across sleep positions
- Strong pressure relief without dramatic sink
- Very low partner disturbance in our motion checks
Who it is best for
- Mixed-position sleepers who want a steady foam feel
- Back sleepers who dislike an overly plush top
- Couples who prioritize quiet, stable sleep
Where it falls short
- Not a fast-bounce surface for athletic “springy bed” fans
- Edge use feels less firm than coil designs
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Medium firmness; even contour; low motion transfer | Moderate responsiveness; softer edge sit than springs |
Details
- Type: Memory foam.
- Firmness (listed): Medium.
- Thickness options: 8", 10".
- Available sizes (listed): Twin, Full, Queen, California King, Eastern King.
- Notable feature: Green tea infused foam described as naturally deodorizing unwanted scents.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.1 | My hips stayed level; Carlos reported consistent lumbar feel on his back. |
| Cooling | 3.7 | Neutral-to-warm for foam; didn’t spike heat quickly in our checks. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Shoulder/hip comfort stayed steady without sharp pressure buildup. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.5 | Very little vibration transfer during the disturbance simulation. |
| Responsiveness | 3.4 | Turns are smooth but not “instant,” especially after deeper sink. |
| Edge Support | 3.4 | Fine for sleeping near the edge; sitting compresses the foam noticeably. |
| Durability | 3.8 | Support feel stayed consistent through repeated roll/turn cycles. |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | Most balanced foam option for mixed sleepers in this set. |
Herbacoal-12
Our Testing Experience
Herbacoal-12 immediately felt deeper—more cushion under the shoulder and more “nesting” under the hips. Mia liked it on night one because she could stay on her side longer without that familiar shoulder pinch. For me, the first hour felt great, but I had to pay attention to hip alignment if I stayed too long in one position; it’s the kind of foam depth that rewards a careful pillow setup. Carlos noted that the mattress is comfortable, but slower: when he changed posture, it took a beat for the surface to level out again. Marcus didn’t complain about heat, but he also didn’t call it cool.
What we liked
- Deep pressure relief that favored side-sleep comfort
- Extremely quiet feel with minimal movement spread
- Cushioned surface that reduces “hard bed” sensations
Who it is best for
- Pressure-sensitive side sleepers (shoulders, outer hips, knees)
- Couples who want the least partner disturbance
- Sleepers who like a plusher, deeper foam sensation
Where it falls short
- Heavier sleepers may want a firmer, quicker-supporting surface
- Slower response can feel sticky during frequent position changes
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Deep cushioning; excellent motion isolation; green tea and charcoal infused foam | Slower responsiveness; more sink can reduce alignment for some sleepers |
Details
- Type: Memory foam.
- Thickness (listed): 12".
- Available sizes (listed): Full, Queen, California King, Eastern King.
- Notable feature: Green tea and charcoal infused memory foam.
- Foundation options: Yes or No.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.9 | Support is present, but deeper sink can shift hip level for some sleepers. |
| Cooling | 3.5 | Neutral foam temperature; comfortable, but not distinctly cool overnight. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.4 | Mia’s side-sleep pressure points stayed the calmest on this model. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.6 | Movement was highly contained in our partner-disturbance simulation. |
| Responsiveness | 3.2 | Noticeably slower reset after turns and posture changes. |
| Edge Support | 3.3 | Sleeping near the edge is fine; sitting feels softer and more compressed. |
| Durability | 3.9 | Foam support feel held steady, though deeper compression needs mindful rotation. |
| Overall Score | 3.8 | Best for pressure relief; less ideal if you need quick, firm support. |
Bed-618
Our Testing Experience
Bed-618 was the most traditional-feeling option: you lie down and immediately sense pushback. The thinner 6-inch profile is honest about what it is—supportive and springy, but not plush. Carlos did his alignment checks and found it surprisingly stable for lying flat, especially if you prefer a firmer base. Mia felt the difference fast; after longer side-sleep stretches, her shoulder and outer hip were more aware of the coil support underneath. Marcus appreciated the airflow feel compared with foam, but he also flagged the obvious trade-off: movement carries. If I shifted in the middle of the night, the surface broadcast it.
What we liked
- Quick response that makes turning easy
- More “classic spring” feel for people who dislike foam sink
- Solid choice for short-term or guest-room use
Who it is best for
- Back sleepers who like a firmer, more responsive base
- Guest rooms, kids, and starter setups
- People who want a spring feel at a minimal profile
Where it falls short
- Motion isolation is the weakest of this group
- Side sleepers may feel pressure at shoulders and hips
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Responsive spring support; breathable design; medium firmness listed | Higher motion transfer; thinner build reduces pressure relief |
Details
- Type: Bonnell spring mattress.
- Thickness (listed): 6 inches.
- Firmness (listed): Medium.
- Available sizes (listed): Twin, Full.
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.8 | Stable, straightforward support; less contour for hips/shoulders. |
| Cooling | 4.0 | More airflow sensation than the foam models in our overnight checks. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.4 | Mia’s side-sleep pressure points surfaced earlier than on foam. |
| Motion Isolation | 2.9 | Movement traveled noticeably across the mattress during disturbance tests. |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Fast, easy turning; no “stuck” sensation. |
| Edge Support | 3.8 | More stable edge sit than the foam models; still not a reinforced hybrid edge. |
| Durability | 3.6 | Coil structure feels sturdy; comfort is limited by the thin profile. |
| Overall Score | 3.7 | Best as a simple spring option, especially for short stays and firmer preferences. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Viscogel | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 3.4 |
| Herbalfusion | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 3.7 | 4.5 | 3.8 | 3.4 |
| Herbacoal-12 | 3.8 | 3.9 | 4.4 | 3.5 | 4.6 | 3.9 | 3.2 |
| Bed-618 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 4.0 | 2.9 | 3.6 | 4.2 |
Viscogel is the steadiest “no drama” performer, leading on motion isolation while staying strong on pressure relief. Herbalfusion is the most even-handed foam choice—no single metric dominates, but few weaknesses stand out. Herbacoal-12 clearly wins for pressure relief and low disturbance, though its slower response makes it less nimble. Bed-618 owns responsiveness and airflow, but it pays for that with the lowest motion isolation.
How to Choose the AC Pacific Mattress?
If you’re a side sleeper or wake up with shoulder/hip tenderness, prioritize Viscogel or Herbacoal-12 for their deeper pressure relief. If you switch positions and want a dependable middle feel, Herbalfusion is the safest “one bed, many sleepers” pick. If you prefer a more traditional spring bounce or need a simple guest-room mattress, Bed-618 fits best. Hot sleepers generally do better on Bed-618 first, then Viscogel, based on our overnight heat checks.
Limitations
These AC Pacific Mattress options skew toward simple constructions and fewer specialty features, so edge support and fast responsiveness are not standout strengths on the foam models. Herbacoal-12 can feel too sink-prone for heavier back or stomach sleepers. Bed-618 is not ideal for couples sensitive to movement and can feel firm for side sleepers who need deep joint relief.
AC Pacific Mattress Vs. Alternatives
Why choose these models
- Straightforward lineup that covers foam comfort and basic spring bounce
- Foam options deliver strong motion isolation for the category
- The spring model is a simple, budget-friendly guest-room solution
Alternatives to consider
- Zinus Original Green Tea Memory Foam Mattress for another green-tea-infused foam approach.
- Linenspa 8" Memory Foam Hybrid Mattress if you want springs with a foam top and a more hybrid-like feel.
- IKEA spring and hybrid mattress lineup if you want broader firmness and style variety in-store.
Pro Tips for AC Pacific Mattress
- Give foam models a consistent pillow setup for the first week; small changes in neck height affect perceived firmness.
- If you sleep hot, use breathable bedding first—cooling begins with airflow above the mattress.
- Rotate the mattress on a regular schedule to keep wear more even, especially on thicker foams.
- For side sleepers, focus on shoulder sink: if your shoulder feels jammed, adjust pillow height before blaming the mattress.
- If you sit on the edge daily, use a wider “perimeter zone” instead of the same exact spot to reduce localized compression.
- On thinner spring options like Bed-618, add a softer topper only if pressure points show up; avoid making the surface too unstable.
- For back sleepers with lower-back tightness, prioritize a flatter pelvis: if your hips dip, consider a slightly firmer surface or a thinner pillow.
- Keep the foundation stable and level; uneven support makes foam feel softer and coils feel lumpy.
- If you toss and turn, choose the model with the least “stuck” feel (Bed-618 first, then Herbalfusion/Viscogel).
FAQs
Which AC Pacific Mattress felt best for side sleeping?
Herbacoal-12 had the deepest cushion for shoulders and outer hips, with Viscogel close behind. Herbalfusion worked well for side sleepers who don’t want a very plush sink.
Which model is most couple-friendly?
Viscogel and Herbacoal-12 were the quietest and least disruptive when one person moved, with Herbalfusion close behind.
Does Bed-618 work for everyday use?
It can, especially for back sleepers who like a firmer, springy surface, but couples and pressure-sensitive side sleepers may feel its limitations sooner.
Which model is easiest to move on?
Bed-618 is the easiest for quick turns. Among the foams, Herbalfusion felt slightly easier to reposition on than Herbacoal-12.
