Product Overview
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weekender 10” Hybrid Mattress - Plush | 4.0 | Balanced cushion + support, strong perimeter feel | Not the coolest-feeling surface for very hot sleepers | Most sleep positions, couples wanting steadier edges |
| Ease 12in Medium Pillow Top Mattress | 3.9 | Stable midline support, lively surface for easy movement | More motion transfer than the foam-heavy models | Combination sleepers who dislike “stuck” foam |
| Iceberg 10" Cool Gel Memory Foam Mattress | 3.9 | Excellent motion isolation, noticeably cool-to-the-touch cover | Weaker edge confidence when you sit or drift outward | Light sleepers sharing a bed, pressure-point sensitive sleepers |
| Jenna Innerspring Mattress | 4.0 | Firm, even support with a straightforward, non-sag feel | Less plush “hug” than the softer hybrids/foams | Back sleepers, stomach sleepers, people who prefer firmer beds |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the four, we found two clear “center-lane” performers: Weekender and Jenna landed the most consistent support feedback night to night, especially for back and combo sleeping. Iceberg was the easiest for undisturbed sleep when someone moved, while Ease was the easiest to reposition on without losing alignment. If you run hot like Marcus, the coil-based builds felt less heat-prone overall, but the Iceberg cover started cool quickly at bedtime.
Absolute Mattress Comparison Chart
| Comparison Item | Weekender 10” Hybrid Mattress - Plush | Ease 12in Medium Pillow Top Mattress | Iceberg 10" Cool Gel Memory Foam Mattress | Jenna Innerspring Mattress |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Hybrid (coils + foam) | Innerspring pillow top | Memory foam | Innerspring |
| Firmness | Plush (model name) | Medium (model name) | - | Firm (product description) |
| Profile / Thickness | 10" | 12" | 10" | - |
| Available Sizes | Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, Cal King | Twin, Full, Queen, Eastern King, Cal King | Queen, Eastern King | Twin, Full, Queen, King, California King |
| Notable Materials / Build Notes | Quilted memory foam; foam encasement; tempered coils | Open coil system; 2.5" orthopedic foam; charcoal cotton-blend cover | Cool gel memory foam; copper-threaded cover; CertiPUR-US foam | Quilted polyester tight-top; responsive + convoluted foam; individually wrapped coils |
| Cooling (test impression) | Moderate | Good | Very good at surface start | Good |
| Motion Isolation (test impression) | Good | Fair | Excellent | Good |
| Edge Support (test impression) | Strong | Good | Fair | Good |
| Starting Price (as tested) | From $249.99 | From $315.00 | $549.00 (Queen sale price) | From $265.26 |
How We Tested It
We rotated each mattress through real nightly use, then ran the same repeatable checks in the morning: support mapping (lumbar and hip level), cooling feel over the first 30 minutes in bed, pressure relief during long side/back holds, and motion isolation when a partner changed positions. We also scored responsiveness during slow rollovers, edge support during extended sitting and “edge drift,” and durability via week-over-week feel consistency. Those seven metrics are the full basis for every score you’ll see below.
Absolute Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Weekender 10” Hybrid Mattress - Plush
Our Testing Experience
By night three, I knew the Weekender’s “plush” label wasn’t code for mushy—it’s more like a soft entry with a steadier midsection once I settled in. I’d start on my side, read for 20 minutes, then roll to my back, and the surface didn’t collapse under my hips the way some budget foams do. Marcus immediately tested heat and edges: he sat to tie his shoes, stood up, sat again, and kept saying the perimeter felt “held up,” which tracks with the foam encasement design. Jenna and Ethan did their partner-movement routine; when he rolled over, she felt it, but it was muted enough that she didn’t brace. Carlos focused on transitions—how quickly the comfort layer hands you off to the coils—and the handoff felt clean rather than abrupt.
What we liked:
- Steady, supportive midline once your weight is down
- Perimeter feels reinforced when sitting and when drifting near the edge
- Cushioning reduces “thud” sensation from movement
Who it is best for:
- Combo sleepers who switch from side to back
- Couples who want a calmer surface without going full memory foam
- People who want a plush top but still need structure underneath
Where it falls short:
- Cooling is acceptable, not exceptional, for very hot sleepers
- Plush feel can feel a touch sinky for strict stomach sleeping
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Details
- Price (as listed by size): Twin 369.99; King $459.99
- Sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, Cal King
- Type: Hybrid (innerspring + cushioning foam)
- Notable construction notes: quilted memory foam; thick foam encasement; heavy-duty tempered coils
- Materials / certifications mentioned: CertiPUR-US foams; Oeko-tex certified textiles
- Warranty: 10-year
- Delivery form: rolled and compressed in a box
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.1 | Coils kept my hips from dipping during back-sleep stretches. |
| Cooling | 3.8 | Comfortable, but not the coolest surface in a warm room. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2 | Side-sleep comfort layer reduced shoulder/hip pressure without “bottoming out.” |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0 | Partner movement was muted; not dead-silent like foam, but controlled. |
| Responsiveness | 3.9 | Easy rollovers with a slight foam drag near the top. |
| Edge Support | 4.1 | Edge felt reinforced during sitting and edge drift tests. |
| Durability | 3.9 | Feel stayed consistent week to week with no early soft spots. |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Most balanced option in this set for mixed positions and couple use. |
Ease 12in Medium Pillow Top Mattress
Our Testing Experience
The Ease felt like the “classic bed” of the group—when I first lay down, there’s a pillow-top welcome, then the support shows up quickly underneath. I noticed it most when I sat upright to work on a laptop: the surface stayed level enough that my lower back didn’t complain after 30–40 minutes. Carlos is picky about alignment; he did his slow-roll routine (back to side, side to back) and kept coming back to how predictable the support felt, which matches the open-coil foundation plus foam layers in the build. Jenna and Ethan found the biggest downside: when he got up and came back in, she felt more of the movement than on Iceberg, and even more than on Weekender. Dr. Adrian Walker’s note was straightforward—medium feel with a stable core tends to work best when you need hips and shoulders to stay on the same plane.
What we liked:
- Predictable, medium support with an easy-to-move-on surface
- Comfortable pillow-top entry without a deep “hug”
- Good choice if you dislike slow-responding foam
Who it is best for:
- Combination sleepers who roll and reposition
- People who read or sit in bed and want a steadier surface
- Back sleepers who want medium support
Where it falls short:
- Motion transfer is noticeable when a partner moves
- Not the most pressure-relieving option for sharp shoulder sensitivity
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Details
- Price shown: $315.00 (Twin listed)
- Sizes shown: Twin, Full, Queen, Eastern King, Cal King
- Mattress overall thickness: 12 inches
- Cover and materials mentioned: signature charcoal cotton blend stretch fabric cover; CertiPUR-US foam
- Support system noted: open coil system; support foam includes 2.5" orthopedic foam
- Coil counts listed: Twin 240; Full 336; Queen 416; Eastern King 520
- Warranty: 10-year non pro-rated
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2 | Stable, medium support helped keep my hips level on my back. |
| Cooling | 4.1 | Coil-based build felt less heat-prone through the night. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.8 | Pillow-top comfort, but less joint “cushion” than the foam-heavy mattress. |
| Motion Isolation | 3.3 | Partner movement carried more than the other three options. |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Easy rollovers and repositioning without “stuck” foam feel. |
| Edge Support | 4.0 | Confident sitting edge; less collapse than all-foam. |
| Durability | 3.8 | Held its feel well, though pillow-top comfort is typically the first to soften. |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | Best for people who want a classic, medium mattress that’s easy to move on. |
Iceberg 10" Cool Gel Memory Foam Mattress
Our Testing Experience
The first thing you notice is the cover: when I got into bed, it started cool and stayed comfortable long enough for me to fall asleep without that “heat bloom” feeling. I’m usually more sensitive to lumbar positioning than surface temperature, but Iceberg’s foam did a solid job keeping my hips from sinking too far as long as I stayed centered. Marcus, who runs hot, appreciated the initial cool feel, but he was also the first to call out the edge—sitting to put on socks felt less supported than on the hybrids and coils. Jenna and Ethan did their motion test and both agreed: this was the quietest bed for partner movement. When Ethan rolled or got back in after a short wake-up, Jenna didn’t flinch, and that’s exactly what a foam-forward design tends to do well.
What we liked:
- Very strong motion isolation for shared sleep
- Cool-feeling cover and airflow-friendly gel foam sensation
- Pressure relief felt forgiving on shoulders and hips
Who it is best for:
- Light sleepers who wake up to partner movement
- Side sleepers who want softer pressure relief
- People who like a calmer, more “still” sleep surface
Where it falls short:
- Edge support is the weakest in this group
- Responsiveness is slower; you notice a bit more “foam drag”
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Details
- Price shown: $549.00 (Queen sale price)
- Sizes shown: Queen; Eastern King
- Cover / cooling details mentioned: Icy Copper fabric; cool gel memory foam
- Foam and safety note: CertiPUR-US foam mentioned
- Manufacturing note: manufactured in the USA
- Delivery form: arrives rolled in a box
- Warranty: 10-year limited
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 3.8 | Good support when centered; less confidence near the edge. |
| Cooling | 4.3 | Cover and gel foam started cool and stayed comfortable at bedtime. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.3 | Most forgiving on shoulders and hips during longer side holds. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.5 | Best in this group for muffling partner movement. |
| Responsiveness | 3.4 | Noticeably slower rebound when turning compared with hybrids/coils. |
| Edge Support | 3.2 | Softer perimeter feel when sitting and during edge drift. |
| Durability | 3.7 | Held up fine in our window, but foam edges are the first area to feel tired. |
| Overall Score | 3.9 | Best for motion isolation and cool-to-the-touch comfort, with an edge trade-off. |
Jenna Innerspring Mattress
Our Testing Experience
Jenna is the “no-nonsense” feel in this set: the surface reads firm and even, and I felt that immediately when I shifted from side to back—my hips stayed up rather than settling down and creating that slight banana curve. Carlos liked it for the same reason: he’s sensitive to mid-back fatigue, and he kept saying the bed stayed “flat” under him through the night. Marcus tested the classic sag question by lying still on his back, then rolling stomach-down; the support stayed consistent and he didn’t get that hammocking sensation he hates. Jenna also behaved well for couple sleep: Jenna and Ethan could feel motion more than on Iceberg, but less than on the more traditional-feeling Ease, likely because of the individually wrapped coils. Dr. Adrian Walker’s guidance was that firm, even support can be a practical starting point when lower-back tightness shows up after long desk days, as long as shoulders and hips aren’t being forced upward.
What we liked:
- Firm, level support that kept my lumbar region steady
- Easy repositioning; no “stuck” foam feeling
- Motion control better than a classic open-coil bed
Who it is best for:
- Back sleepers and stomach sleepers who want firmness
- People who dislike deep contouring
- Hot sleepers who prefer less foam “hug”
Where it falls short:
- Less plush pressure relief for very sensitive shoulders/hips
- Not the quietest for motion compared with Iceberg
Pros & Cons
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
Details
- Price (as listed by size): Twin 388.12; King $483.52
- Sizes shown: Twin, Full, Queen, King, California King
- Type (as described): firm innerspring mattress
- Notable build details listed: quilted polyester tight-top; foam layers; 7" individually wrapped coils
- Weight capacity listed: 300 lbs
- Warranty: 10-year
- Delivery form: ships compressed and rolled; “unrolls and decompress”
Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.3 | Firm, level feel kept my hips and lumbar region steady overnight. |
| Cooling | 4.0 | Less foam hug and a coil core helped it feel comfortable through the night. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.7 | Adequate, but not as forgiving as the foam-focused Iceberg. |
| Motion Isolation | 3.8 | Noticeably better than a classic open-coil bed; still not all-foam quiet. |
| Responsiveness | 4.2 | Easy rollovers with quick recovery. |
| Edge Support | 3.9 | Solid enough for sitting and edge drift, though not as “braced” as Weekender. |
| Durability | 3.8 | Support stayed consistent; long-term depends on how the comfort layers hold up. |
| Overall Score | 4.0 | Best match here for people who want a firm, straightforward innerspring feel. |
Compare Performance Scores of These Mattresses
| Mattress | Overall Score | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weekender 10” Hybrid Mattress - Plush | 4.0 | 4.1 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 3.9 |
| Ease 12in Medium Pillow Top Mattress | 3.9 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 4.2 |
| Iceberg 10" Cool Gel Memory Foam Mattress | 3.9 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 3.7 | 3.4 |
| Jenna Innerspring Mattress | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.7 | 4.0 | 3.8 | 3.8 | 4.2 |
The most evenly strong overall performers were Weekender and Jenna, mainly because they paired reliable support with easy movement. Iceberg clearly led motion isolation and pressure relief, but gave some of that back at the edge and in responsiveness. Ease stayed competitive on cooling and repositioning comfort, but its motion isolation score explains why couples noticed more partner movement.
How to Choose the Absolute Mattress?
Start with how you sleep most nights. If you rotate positions or share a bed, Weekender is the safest “do-most-things-well” pick. If you wake up easily from partner movement or want softer pressure relief, Iceberg is the quietest. If you want a traditional medium feel and easy repositioning, choose Ease. If you prefer a firm, even surface—especially for back or stomach sleeping—Jenna is the most straightforward match.
Limitations
These mattresses lean practical rather than premium: you get clear, simple feels and accessible pricing, but fewer fine-tuned options. Iceberg’s edge is the least supportive for sitting or sleeping near the perimeter. Ease transfers more motion for couples. Jenna’s firmness can feel too unyielding for people with very sensitive shoulders or hips.
Absolute Mattress Vs. Alternatives
Why choose these models:
- Budget-forward lineup with multiple constructions (foam, hybrid, innerspring)
- Several options ship compressed/boxed for easier setup
- Clear use cases: motion isolation (Iceberg), firm support (Jenna), balanced hybrid (Weekender)
Alternatives to consider:
- Tuft & Needle Original: breathable, fast-recovery proprietary foam for responsive comfort and pressure relief
- Linenspa 10" Memory Foam Hybrid: budget hybrid with memory foam plus individually-encased springs
- Zinus Cooling Green Tea Memory Foam: gel-infused memory foam with cooling focus and a trial window
Pro Tips for Absolute Mattress
- Give boxed mattresses time to fully expand before judging firmness and support, especially the all-foam model.
- If you sleep hot, prioritize breathable bedding (lighter comforter, moisture-wicking sheets) before blaming the mattress.
- For edge-sensitive sleepers, use a supportive platform or foundation and avoid weak, widely spaced slats.
- If you share a bed, test motion isolation by having one person shift positions while the other stays still and rates disturbance.
- Side sleepers: keep your pillow height consistent while testing, otherwise shoulder pressure can be a pillow problem, not a mattress problem.
- Back sleepers: evaluate alignment by checking whether your hips sink deeper than your ribcage after 10 minutes.
- Rotate the mattress periodically to even out wear, especially on softer comfort layers.
- If you sit on the edge daily, choose a mattress that feels stable at the perimeter (Weekender performed best here).
- When comparing models, keep room temperature consistent; “cooling” impressions change dramatically with bedding and ambient heat.
- For new-mattress comfort, use a thin protector that doesn’t change surface feel as much as thick quilted protectors can.
FAQs
Which Absolute Mattress option is best for couples?
If partner movement is your top issue, Iceberg dampened motion the most. Weekender also performed well while offering stronger edge confidence for shared sleeping space. Ease was the most noticeable for motion transfer when one person got in and out of bed.
Which one felt firmest in real use?
Jenna consistently felt the firmest and most level under my hips and lower back. It was the easiest to keep neutral alignment on my back, but it didn’t provide the softest pressure relief for shoulders.
What’s the best pick for a hot sleeper?
Ease and Jenna felt less heat-prone through the night because they didn’t trap as much warmth at the surface. Iceberg started cool at bedtime and stayed comfortable, but edge support was the trade-off.
