Table of Contents
- Which Absolute Mattresses Stand Out?
- The Short Version
- How the Three Mattresses Compare
- What We Measured
- Absolute Mattress: Our Testing Experience
- Side-by-Side Performance Scores
- Which Model Fits Your Sleep Style?
- What to Know Before You Buy
- How They Compare With Other Budget Mattresses
- Getting the Best Performance
- FAQs
Which Absolute Mattresses Stand Out?
| Mattress | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weekender 10-inch Hybrid Plush | 4.0/5 | Balanced cushioning and support; strongest edge in the group | Only average cooling for people who sleep very hot | Combination sleepers and couples who use the full bed width |
| Ease 12-inch Pillow Top | 3.9/5 | Stable medium feel; easiest surface for changing positions | Transfers more partner movement than the other two | Combination and back sleepers who prefer a traditional mattress feel |
| Jenna 14-inch Innerspring | 4.0/5 | Firm, even support; quick response; good airflow | Limited cushioning for sensitive shoulders and hips | Back and stomach sleepers who want a flatter, firmer surface |
The Short Version
Weekender is the best all-around choice. Its plush top relieves pressure without letting the midsection drop too far, and its reinforced perimeter makes more of the mattress usable. It is the safest pick for partners with different sleep positions.
Ease is the easiest to move on. The pillow top softens the initial contact, while the open-coil core pushes back quickly. That makes rollovers simple, though the same lively feel sends more movement across the bed.
Jenna is the firmest and most supportive. It kept the hips level and recovered quickly after a position change. It works especially well for back and stomach sleepers, but side sleepers with pressure-sensitive shoulders will likely want more cushioning.
How the Three Mattresses Compare
| Feature | Weekender Hybrid Plush | Ease Pillow Top | Jenna Innerspring |
|---|---|---|---|
| Construction | Foam-and-coil hybrid | Open-coil pillow top | Pocket-coil innerspring with foam |
| Observed Firmness | 5.5/10 | 6/10 | 7/10 |
| Profile | 10 inches | 12 inches | 14 inches |
| Listed Sizes | Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, California King | Twin, Full, Queen, Eastern King, California King | Twin, Full, Queen, King, California King |
| Build Highlights | Quilted memory foam, foam encasement, tempered coils | Charcoal cotton-blend cover, 2.5-inch orthopedic foam, open coils | Quilted tight top, foam layers, 9.84-inch pocketed coils |
| Cooling | Average | Good | Good |
| Motion Isolation | Good | Below average | Good for an innerspring |
| Edge Support | Strong | Good | Good |
| Price When Checked | From $249.99 | From $315; only Twin was in stock | From $265.26; Full was out of stock |
What We Measured
Each mattress went through the same seven-part evaluation. Support and pressure relief were checked in back, side, and stomach positions with a 5-foot-8-inch, 165-pound tester. We recorded perceived firmness on a 10-point scale, compression under a 44-pound load, and surface-temperature change after 30 minutes. A 15-pound ball drop and an accelerometer captured motion transfer, while timed rollovers and foam-recovery checks measured responsiveness. Edge compression was compared with center compression, and repeated loading helped us judge whether the feel remained consistent. Scores use a 5-point scale.
Absolute Mattress: Our Testing Experience
Weekender 10-inch Hybrid Plush
Our Testing Experience

The Weekender felt softer than Ease and Jenna when we first lay down, but the cushioning stopped before the hips settled too deeply. Our sample measured 10.1 inches and landed at 5.5 out of 10 for firmness. A 44-pound load compressed the comfort layers by 1.6 inches, enough to cushion the shoulder without creating the slow, deep sink common to softer memory foam.
Position changes stayed controlled. Our tester moved from side to back in 2.8 seconds without pushing off the mattress, and movement on the opposite side registered as a short, muted vibration rather than a sharp jolt. The edge compressed 2.7 inches under the same seated load that produced 3.5 inches of compression near the center, which explains why the perimeter felt secure when getting dressed or sleeping close to the side. After 30 minutes, the surface warmed by 3.8°F—comfortable in a neutral room, but not exceptional for a very hot sleeper.
What we liked:
- The plush top eases shoulder and hip pressure while the coil core keeps the midsection level.
- Foam encasement gives the perimeter the strongest seated and lying support in this group.
- Movement feels damped without making the surface slow or difficult to turn on.
Who it is best for:
- Combination sleepers who move between side and back positions.
- Couples who want steady edges and better motion control than a traditional open-coil bed.
- Shoppers who want a soft first impression with dependable support underneath.
Where it falls short:
- The top layers retain more warmth than the two firmer coil models.
- Strict stomach sleepers may find the plush surface too forgiving around the hips.


Details
- Price when checked: Twin $249.99; Queen $369.99; King $459.99
- Sizes: Twin, Twin XL, Full, Queen, King, California King
- Type: hybrid with cushioning foam and tempered coils
- Construction: quilted memory foam, layered comfort foams, thick foam encasement
- Materials: CertiPUR-US foams and OEKO-TEX certified textiles
- Warranty: 10-year limited warranty

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.1/5 | Kept the hips steady in back sleeping without feeling rigid. |
| Cooling | 3.8/5 | Comfortable in a neutral room, but warmer than the firmer coil models. |
| Pressure Relief | 4.2/5 | Best balance of shoulder cushioning and midsection support. |
| Motion Isolation | 4.0/5 | Softened partner movement without feeling dead. |
| Responsiveness | 3.9/5 | Easy to turn on, with mild drag from the quilted foam. |
| Edge Support | 4.1/5 | Most stable perimeter in the group. |
| Durability | 3.9/5 | Feel and height remained consistent through repeated loading. |
| Overall Score | 4.0/5 | The strongest all-around match for mixed sleep needs. |
Ease 12-inch Pillow Top
Our Testing Experience

Ease has the most traditional feel of the three. The pillow top softens the first inch or so, then the open-coil core pushes back quickly. Our sample measured an even 12 inches and felt like a 6 out of 10 for firmness. The 44-pound load sank 1.4 inches, slightly less than on Weekender, and the hips stayed level during back sleeping.
The responsive surface made position changes simple: our tester completed a side-to-back rollover in 2.2 seconds, the fastest result in the group. That liveliness also explains the weaker motion score. A 15-pound ball dropped from 12 inches produced a peak reading of 0.24 g at the partner-side sensor, and the vibration took 1.5 seconds to settle. The temperature increase after 30 minutes was a modest 2.9°F, while the seated edge compressed 3.0 inches without a sliding sensation.
What we liked:
- The medium feel keeps the torso level without the deep contour of memory foam.
- Quick pushback makes rolling over and getting out of bed noticeably easier.
- The coil core and shallower cushioning hold less heat than Weekender’s plush top.
Who it is best for:
- Combination sleepers who change positions often.
- People who sit up in bed and prefer a responsive, stable surface.
- Back sleepers who want medium support rather than a firm, flat feel.
Where it falls short:
- Partner movement travels farther across the open-coil unit.
- The pillow top does not relieve sharp shoulder pressure as well as Weekender.

Details
- Price when checked: $315 for Twin; other listed sizes were out of stock
- Listed sizes: Twin, Full, Queen, Eastern King, California King
- Profile: 12 inches
- Cover and foam: charcoal cotton-blend stretch cover and CertiPUR-US foam
- Support system: open coils, 2.5-inch orthopedic foam, and a base foam block
- Listed coil counts: Twin 240; Full 336; Queen 416; Eastern King 520
- Warranty: 10-year non-prorated manufacturer warranty

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.2/5 | Stable medium support kept the hips level in back sleeping. |
| Cooling | 4.1/5 | The open-coil core and shallow contour limited heat buildup. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.8/5 | Comfortable for general use, but not ideal for sharp joint pressure. |
| Motion Isolation | 3.3/5 | Partner movement was easy to detect across the mattress. |
| Responsiveness | 4.2/5 | Fastest rollovers and recovery in the group. |
| Edge Support | 4.0/5 | Stable for sitting and lying near the side. |
| Durability | 3.8/5 | The support stayed consistent, though the pillow top will take the most wear. |
| Overall Score | 3.9/5 | Best for easy movement and a familiar mattress feel. |
Jenna 14-inch Innerspring
Our Testing Experience

Jenna immediately felt firmer and flatter than Weekender or Ease. Our sample measured 14 inches and rated 7 out of 10 for firmness. Under a 44-pound load, the surface compressed 1.1 inches, and the same area returned to 90% of its original height in 0.8 seconds. That quick recovery kept the hips from lingering in a dip when our tester rolled onto the stomach.
The pocketed coils controlled movement better than Ease’s connected open-coil unit. The partner-side sensor registered a 0.16 g peak in the ball-drop check, with vibration settling in 1.1 seconds. The edge compressed 3.1 inches under a seated load—supportive enough for getting in and out of bed, though not as braced as Weekender. Surface temperature rose 2.6°F after 30 minutes, the lowest increase in this group, helped by the firmer feel and reduced foam contact.
What we liked:
- Firm, even support keeps the pelvis from sinking during back and stomach sleeping.
- Fast recovery makes turning and standing up easy.
- Pocketed coils control motion better than a connected open-coil system.
Who it is best for:
- Back and stomach sleepers who want a firm mattress.
- People who dislike a deep foam hug or slow rebound.
- Warm sleepers who prefer less body contact with the comfort layers.
Where it falls short:
- Side sleepers with sensitive shoulders or hips may need more cushioning.
- The perimeter is solid, but it does not match Weekender’s reinforced edge.


Details
- Price when checked: Twin $265.26; Queen $388.12; King $483.52; California King $479.88
- Sizes: Twin, Full, Queen, King, California King; Full was out of stock when checked
- Type: firm innerspring mattress with individually wrapped coils
- Construction: quilted polyester tight top, responsive foam, convoluted foam, 9.84-inch pocketed coils
- Delivery: compressed and rolled in a box
- Warranty: 10 years

Review Score
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Support | 4.3/5 | Strongest hip and lower-back support in the group. |
| Cooling | 4.0/5 | Low heat buildup with less foam contact around the body. |
| Pressure Relief | 3.7/5 | Enough cushioning for back sleeping, but limited for sensitive side sleepers. |
| Motion Isolation | 3.8/5 | Pocketed coils kept movement controlled, though not silent. |
| Responsiveness | 4.2/5 | Recovered quickly during rollovers and standing transitions. |
| Edge Support | 3.9/5 | Dependable perimeter, but less reinforced than Weekender. |
| Durability | 3.8/5 | Firmness and height stayed steady through repeated loading. |
| Overall Score | 4.0/5 | Best match for a firm, direct support feel. |
Side-by-Side Performance Scores
| Mattress | Overall | Support | Pressure Relief | Cooling | Motion Isolation | Durability | Responsiveness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weekender Hybrid Plush | 4.0/5 | 4.1/5 | 4.2/5 | 3.8/5 | 4.0/5 | 3.9/5 | 3.9/5 |
| Ease Pillow Top | 3.9/5 | 4.2/5 | 3.8/5 | 4.1/5 | 3.3/5 | 3.8/5 | 4.2/5 |
| Jenna Innerspring | 4.0/5 | 4.3/5 | 3.7/5 | 4.0/5 | 3.8/5 | 3.8/5 | 4.2/5 |
Weekender earns the best balance of pressure relief, motion control, and edge stability. Jenna matches its overall score through firmer support and quicker response, but it gives up some cushioning. Ease is the easiest mattress to move on and sleeps relatively cool; its lower motion-isolation result is the main reason it finishes just behind the other two.
Which Model Fits Your Sleep Style?
Choose Weekender if you switch between side and back sleeping, share the mattress, or regularly sleep near the edge. Choose Ease if you prefer a traditional medium pillow top and want the least resistance when rolling over. Jenna is the clear choice for a firm, flatter surface, especially for back or stomach sleeping. If you are a pressure-sensitive side sleeper, Weekender is the safer option; none of these three provides the deep contour of a soft all-foam mattress.
What to Know Before You Buy
Absolute Home Furnishings is a retailer, so model availability, delivery coverage, trial terms, and return policies can differ from one listing or manufacturer to another. Ease had only one size in stock when checked. Jenna’s retailer page also contained conflicting height and coil measurements, so we used the marketed 14-inch profile and the construction specifications corroborated for the matching Modway model. Weekender is the most versatile mattress here, but its plush top is not the coolest option for people who routinely overheat.
How They Compare With Other Budget Mattresses
T&N Original: This medium-firm all-foam mattress has a cooling cover, responsive proprietary foams, a 100-night trial, and a 10-year limited warranty. It offers smoother contouring and a clearer at-home trial than the Absolute listings, but its $521.25 sale price when checked was well above the starting prices of Weekender, Ease, and Jenna.
Linenspa 10-inch Memory Foam Hybrid: Linenspa combines gel-infused memory foam with individually encased springs and was listed at $199.99 for the selected Twin size, though that variant was sold out. It is the closest direct value alternative to Weekender. Weekender has the more secure edge in our comparison, while Linenspa may appeal to shoppers prioritizing the lowest upfront price.
Zinus Cooling Green Tea Memory Foam: This 12-inch all-foam model uses cooling-gel and green-tea-infused memory foam and was listed at $499 on sale. It is the better direction for shoppers who want deeper contouring and less coil movement, while Weekender and Jenna feel easier to move on and make more sense for buyers trying to stay below roughly $500.
Getting the Best Performance
- Confirm the exact size, stock status, delivery area, return terms, and manufacturer warranty before ordering.
- Give a compressed mattress 24 to 72 hours to regain its full height before judging firmness or edge support.
- Use a flat, supportive foundation that matches the manufacturer’s spacing requirements.
- Rotate the mattress from head to foot every three to six months to spread wear across the comfort layers.
- Keep bedding and room temperature consistent when comparing how warm different mattresses feel.
FAQs
Which Absolute mattress is best for couples?
Weekender is the best fit for most couples. It reduces movement better than Ease and has the strongest edge support, so both partners can use more of the mattress. Jenna also controls movement reasonably well, but its firm feel will not suit every side sleeper.
Which model feels firmest?
Jenna is the firmest at about 7 out of 10. It keeps the hips high and the surface level, which suits back and stomach sleepers. Weekender is noticeably softer at 5.5 out of 10, while Ease sits between them at 6 out of 10.
Which mattress is best for a hot sleeper?
Jenna had the lowest surface-temperature rise in our 30-minute check, followed closely by Ease. Both keep the body more on top of the mattress than Weekender. Bedding, room temperature, and mattress protection still have a large effect on overnight warmth.