MGBW sofas sit in the premium, design-led tier: clean silhouettes, lots of customization, and a seat feel that’s meant to stay comfortable over the long haul. For this review, I spent time with four core styles that represent the brand’s main “sit profiles,” then scored them on everyday comfort, back support, temperature feel, durability, cleaning practicality, and how they work in real rooms. If you want tailored modern lines but still plan to actually lounge, a few clear patterns show up fast—and the Sofa Resource Hub, Best Modern Sofas, Best Sofas, and All Sofa Reviews pages are useful baselines for broader comparisons.
Table of Contents
Product Overview
| Sofa | Overall Score | Pros | Cons | Ideal For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter Sofa | 4.4 | Deep, lounge-first seat; easy all-night comfort | Depth can feel long for shorter legs; low back profile | Sprawling, family rooms, casual hosting |
| Cooper Sofa | 4.2 | Structured shape, steady sit, strong upright-to-relax balance | Lower seat height; not the plushest for naps | Clean-lined spaces, posture-minded sitters |
| Soma Sofa | 4.3 | Versatile depth, supportive pillow feel, stable base | Back pillows need occasional fluffing; looks best kept tidy | Mixed-use living rooms, “work then lounge” days |
| Haywood Sofa | 4.1 | Soft landing comfort, cozy lounge vibe | Can run warm; cushions show movement more | Long TV sessions, relaxed households |
Testing Team Takeaways
Across the four, Hunter was the easiest sofa to stay on for hours. Soma felt like the best all-around “switch-hitter” for laptop time and lounging. Cooper delivered the most consistent supported posture when we wanted to sit more upright. Haywood was the coziest for slow TV nights, with the expected trade-offs: more pillow tidying and more heat build-up when the room was warm.
MGBW Sofa Comparison Chart
| Sofa | Size options | Overall depth x height | Seat height | Seat depth | Perceived firmness | Back support feel | Cooling / breathability feel | Cleaning practicality | Durability impression |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter Sofa | 90", 100" widths | 39" x 32" | 20" | 24" | Medium | Medium | Good | Good | Strong |
| Cooper Sofa | 84", 96", 108" widths | 35" x 29" | 18" | 25" | Medium-firm | Good | Moderate | Moderate | Strong |
| Soma Sofa | 90", 100" widths | 37" x 34" | 20" | 22" | Medium | Good | Moderate | Moderate | Strong |
| Haywood Sofa | 90", 100" widths | 43" x 36" | 19" | 19" | Medium-soft | Moderate | Fair | Fair | Strong |
How We Tested It
We ran each sofa through the same week-to-week routine (our How We Test Sofas process): assembly and setup, long sits and short naps for comfort and ergonomics, warm-room evenings to gauge cooling and breathability, repeated entry/exit plus cushion recovery checks for sofa durability, real traffic-path use for size and layout practicality, spill-and-crumb tests for fabric and cleaning, and a final value and warranty gut-check. We logged notes after each session and revisited impressions after multiple days.
MGBW Sofa: Our Testing Experience
Hunter Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

We started with Hunter on a long movie-and-laptop night, then rotated Marcus and Jenna through the same routine. The 24" seat depth naturally pushed everyone into a laid-back position—hips lower, legs out—without feeling unstable. Marcus did repeated edge sits for shoes and quick stand-ups and felt the front edge stayed predictable. During a shared movie night, Jenna and Ethan noticed the sofa stayed steady when one person shifted, but sitting upright took a bit more effort until we added a small lumbar pillow.
What we liked:
-
Deep, easy lounge feel that stays comfortable over long sessions
-
Predictable edge support for frequent sit-stand moments
-
Enough room to stretch out without fighting the cushions
Who it is best for:
-
People who watch a lot of TV and prefer to sprawl
-
Households that host casually and want flexible seating
-
Anyone who likes a deeper seat for reclining
Where it falls short:
-
Petite users may feel the depth encourages slouching without a pillow
-
Desk-like sitting is doable, but it benefits from lumbar support
-
Low back profile won’t suit people who like tall, upright backs

Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Deep seat supports relaxed lounging | Depth can feel long for shorter legs |
| Cushion and leg options let you tune the feel | Low back profile may feel less supportive upright |
| Front edge stays predictable for quick stand-ups | Upright posture often needs a lumbar pillow |

Details:
-
Size/configuration: sofa; width options 90", 100"
-
Overall dimensions: 39" D x 32" H
-
Seat height: 20"
-
Seat depth: 24"
-
Cushion options: Signature Blend Poly, Eco-Luxe Poly, Eco Down Blend
-
Frame: kiln-dried, responsibly sourced engineered wood frame with mortise-and-tenon joinery
-
Suspension: sinuous wire spring suspension
-
Upholstery options: fabric or leather
-
Leg options: metal legs or round wood feet; multiple finish options
-
Cooling/breathability: depends on upholstery
-
Cleaning practicality: depends on upholstery
-
Delivery/setup: in-room delivery with unpacking and assembly; packaging removed
-
Return policy: custom upholstery not returnable; stocked returns within 21 days (fees apply)
-
Warranty: frame and spring constructions covered for lifetime (residential use); cushions and fabrics have time-limited coverage
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Straightforward placement with in-room service |
| Seat Comfort | 4.6 | Stays comfortable over long sits |
| Back Support | 4.2 | Comfortable, but upright support improves with lumbar help |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.1 | Great for loungers; can feel long for shorter legs |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.3 | Upholstery choice makes the difference |
| Durability | 4.5 | Consistent support across repeated use |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.2 | Easy to shift, though depth can invite slouching |
| Cleaning | 4.2 | Practical with the right upholstery; seams stayed tidy |
| Value | 3.9 | Best payoff if you’ll use the lounge depth often |
| Overall Score | 4.4 | The easiest all-night “live on it” option here |
Cooper Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

Cooper was the sofa we kept coming back to when we wanted a cleaner, more structured sit. Carlos and I ran several laptop-to-movie transitions, and the shelter-style shape helped keep our upper backs from drifting. The 18" seat height feels a touch lower when standing up, but once you’re in, the seat stays steady and supportive. Mia liked that the shape creates a “corner” feeling even on a standard sofa, though she noted it doesn’t have the same sink-in softness as Hunter. In shared use, Jenna and Ethan also noticed less motion transfer than they expected from a tailored silhouette.
What we liked:
-
Structured geometry that supports a more upright posture
-
Stable feel when people shift positions during the evening
-
Polished look that still feels livable day to day
Who it is best for:
-
People who work on a laptop on the sofa before relaxing
-
Rooms that want a refined silhouette with real comfort
-
Sitters who dislike very soft, melt-in cushions
Where it falls short:
-
Lower seat height can feel less friendly for frequent stand-ups
-
Not the best pick if naps are your main priority
-
Depth can still feel long for shorter legs without a pillow

Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Supportive, structured sit for posture-minded use | Lower seat height can make standing feel slower |
| Stable during position changes and shared use | Less sink-in plushness for naps |
| Multiple widths help with room planning | Depth may still be a lot for petite users |

Details:
-
Size/configuration: sofa; width options 84", 96", 108"
-
Overall dimensions: 35" D x 29" H
-
Seat height: 18"
-
Seat depth: 25"
-
Upholstery options: fabric or leather
-
Finish options: recessed wood plinth base with multiple finishes available
-
Cooling/breathability: depends on upholstery
-
Cleaning practicality: depends on upholstery
-
Delivery/setup: in-room delivery with unpacking and assembly; packaging removed
-
Return policy: custom upholstery not returnable; stocked returns within 21 days (fees apply)
-
Warranty: frame and spring constructions covered for lifetime (residential use); cushions and fabrics have time-limited coverage
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Easy to position; footprint reads predictable |
| Seat Comfort | 4.2 | Comfortable, but not a sink-in style |
| Back Support | 4.4 | Shape helps keep you aligned during laptop time |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.0 | Deep enough to relax; long for shorter legs |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.0 | Upholstery-dependent; tailored build runs moderate |
| Durability | 4.4 | Stable support across repeated sessions |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.1 | Shifts feel smooth without fighting the cushion |
| Cleaning | 4.0 | Practical, but fabric choice drives stain stress |
| Value | 3.8 | You’re paying for structure and silhouette |
| Overall Score | 4.2 | Most consistent supportive sit of the group |
Soma Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

Soma became the default on mixed days: a few hours of laptop work, then a long evening show. Jamal immediately noticed the balance—he could stretch out without feeling like his hips were sliding forward—and the 22" seat depth landed as the easiest middle ground in the set. Ethan ran his constant posture-shift routine and could move from upright to semi-reclined without feeling stuck. The oversized knife-edge back pillows feel generous, but we did end up patting them back into place more often than with Cooper to keep the back feel consistent.
What we liked:
-
Versatile seat depth that works for both upright sitting and lounging
-
Stable base feel that supports frequent repositioning
-
Generous back pillows that feel plush without swallowing you
Who it is best for:
-
Hybrid sitters who alternate between laptop work and relaxing
-
Taller users who want room to shift without collapsing posture
-
Living rooms that need one sofa to handle most daily use
Where it falls short:
-
Back pillows need occasional fluffing and straightening
-
Less sink-in cozy than Haywood if you want maximum softness
-
Upholstery choice will decide how “low-maintenance” it feels

Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Seat depth feels versatile across body types | Back pillows need occasional tidying |
| Easy to shift postures without feeling stuck | Not the plushest choice for deep lounging |
| Stable feel supports long mixed-use evenings | Fabric choice drives how crisp it stays |

Details:
-
Size/configuration: sofa; width options 90", 100"
-
Overall dimensions: 37" D x 34" H
-
Seat height: 20"
-
Seat depth: 22"
-
Cushion options: Signature Blend Poly, Eco-Luxe Poly, Eco Down Blend
-
Frame: kiln-dried, responsibly sourced engineered wood frame with mortise-and-tenon joinery
-
Leg style: wood sled leg; multiple finish options available
-
Upholstery options: fabric or leather
-
Cooling/breathability: depends on upholstery
-
Cleaning practicality: depends on upholstery
-
Delivery/setup: in-room delivery with unpacking and assembly; packaging removed
-
Return policy: custom upholstery not returnable; stocked returns within 21 days (fees apply)
-
Warranty: frame and spring constructions covered for lifetime (residential use); cushions and fabrics have time-limited coverage
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Easy to integrate into real layouts |
| Seat Comfort | 4.4 | Comfortable for long mixed-use sessions |
| Back Support | 4.3 | Supportive when pillows are positioned well |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.4 | The most naturally “middle ground” depth here |
| Cooling / Breathability | 4.1 | Neither hot nor airy; upholstery decides |
| Durability | 4.4 | Cushions held shape well in repeated use |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 4.3 | Posture changes feel natural |
| Cleaning | 4.0 | Practical with the right upholstery; pillows need tidying |
| Value | 4.0 | Strong versatility payoff for daily use |
| Overall Score | 4.3 | Best balance for work-then-lounge routines |
Haywood Sofa
Our Testing Experience:

Haywood is the “soft landing” sofa—when you drop into it after a long day, the comfort is immediate. Marcus and I tested longer sessions and quick edge sits; the lounge vibe is strong, but the softer feel makes standing up a little more deliberate. Mia liked the 19" seat depth because she could sit back without her legs dangling as much, and she found curling up easy thanks to the plush back cushion behavior. The trade-off showed up during warm-room testing: after about an hour, heat retention was more noticeable than on the more tailored options.
What we liked:
-
Immediate sink-in comfort for relaxed evenings
-
Seat depth can feel natural for shorter legs
-
Great for slow TV nights and curling up to read
Who it is best for:
-
People who want a softer, more cushioned sit
-
Households that treat the sofa as daily downtime central
-
Loungers who settle in and stay put
Where it falls short:
-
Warmth can build during long sessions in a warm room
-
Cushion tidying becomes part of the routine
-
Less ideal for people who are constantly up and down

Pros & Cons:
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Immediate sink-in comfort for relaxed nights | Heat retention can be more noticeable |
| Seat depth can work well for smaller frames | More routine cushion straightening |
| Cozy profile suits lounge-first rooms | Standing up can feel slower for frequent movers |

Details:
-
Size/configuration: sofa; width options 90", 100"
-
Overall dimensions: 43" D x 36" H
-
Seat height: 19"
-
Seat depth: 19"
-
Cushion options: Signature Blend Poly, Eco-Luxe Poly, Eco Down Blend
-
Back cushion construction notes: down-alternative back cushions; seat cushion construction includes a foam core and layered comfort materials
-
Suspension: woven webbed suspension seat; sheet webbing back
-
Upholstery profile: upholstered to the floor with minimal feet
-
Cooling/breathability: depends on upholstery; thicker profile can feel warmer
-
Cleaning practicality: depends on upholstery; low-to-floor design benefits from routine vacuuming
-
Delivery/setup: in-room delivery with unpacking and assembly; packaging removed
-
Return policy: custom upholstery not returnable; stocked returns within 21 days (fees apply)
-
Warranty: frame and spring constructions covered for lifetime (residential use); cushions and fabrics have time-limited coverage
Review Score:
| Metric | Score | Remarks |
|---|---|---|
| Assembly | 4.6 | Straightforward placement; depth needs room planning |
| Seat Comfort | 4.5 | The coziest feel for long lounging |
| Back Support | 4.0 | Soft back feel benefits from pillow management |
| Seat Depth Fit | 4.3 | Friendly for shorter legs; tall loungers may want more stretch |
| Cooling / Breathability | 3.8 | Plush profile can retain warmth over time |
| Durability | 4.3 | Support stayed consistent; softness needs upkeep |
| Ease of Movement / Repositioning | 3.9 | Great once settled; less ideal for constant up-and-down |
| Cleaning | 3.8 | Low-to-floor base asks for more routine vacuuming |
| Value | 3.7 | Best value if cozy comfort is the priority |
| Overall Score | 4.1 | Comfort-first pick with predictable trade-offs |
Compare Performance Scores of These Sofas
| Sofa | Overall Score | Seat Comfort | Back Support | Seat Depth Fit | Cooling / Breathability | Durability | Ease of Movement / Repositioning |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter Sofa | 4.4 | 4.6 | 4.2 | 4.1 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Cooper Sofa | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.4 | 4.1 |
| Soma Sofa | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.1 | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| Haywood Sofa | 4.1 | 4.5 | 4.0 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 4.3 | 3.9 |
Reading the scores: Soma is the most even performer—no obvious weak link—while Hunter leads on pure sit comfort for long sessions. Cooper’s edge is steadiness and supported posture, especially for laptop-to-relax routines. Haywood is the coziest, but it trades away some cooling efficiency and quick movement ease in exchange for that soft, lounge-first feel.
How to Choose the MGBW Sofa?
Start with seat depth and your default posture. If you sprawl and watch TV for hours, Hunter fits the brief. If you want one sofa that handles “work then lounge,” Soma is the safest pick across body types. If you prefer a more upright, structured feel with a refined silhouette, Cooper makes the most sense. If cozy softness is the priority and you don’t mind routine pillow tidying, Haywood is the comfort-first option.
Limitations
The trade-off across this lineup is straightforward: the more lounge-forward the build, the more you’ll manage posture with pillows and watch warmth during long sessions. Cooper is less satisfying if you want a nap-ready, plush sink. Hunter can feel too deep for petite users without added lumbar support. Haywood is the least convenient choice for households that are constantly up and down.
MGBW Sofa Vs. Alternatives
-
Why you’d pick one of these MGBW models:
-
You want premium silhouettes with meaningful customization options
-
You care about long-session comfort without giving up a tailored look
-
You like distinct “sit profiles,” from structured to lounge-forward
-
-
Alternatives worth cross-shopping:
-
Room & Board Metro: cleaner, more structured everyday sit
-
Crate & Barrel Lounge: familiar, lounge-first feel with widely known sizing
-
Restoration Hardware Cloud: extreme sink-in softness when plushness is the priority
-
Pro Tips for MGBW Sofa
-
Measure seat depth against how you actually sit; deep seats are great for reclining but can encourage slouching when working.
-
If you sit upright for laptop time, plan on a dedicated lumbar pillow.
-
Pick upholstery around your household reality—pets, snacks, and kids change what “easy maintenance” means.
-
For warm rooms, prioritize more breathable upholstery and skip thick throws during long sessions.
-
Rotate and re-fluff back pillows weekly on pillow-back styles to keep the sit consistent.
-
Keep a small handheld vacuum nearby; crumbs and dust collect fastest along seams and at the base.
-
Choose size based on real bodies and real traffic paths, not just room photos.
FAQs
Which MGBW sofa felt best for long movie nights?
Hunter felt the most effortless for all-evening lounging, especially when we stretched out or rotated positions without getting up.
Which option worked best for laptop work without neck strain?
Cooper and Soma were the most reliable for upright-to-relaxed transitions. Cooper feels more structured, while Soma feels more adaptable.
What’s the best choice for shorter legs and petite frames?
Haywood’s 19" seat depth was the easiest for Mia to sit back comfortably, and Soma also balanced depth well without feeling oversized.
Which sofa handled constant repositioning the best?
Soma was the smoothest when Ethan kept shifting positions; it stayed comfortable without feeling unstable or “sticky.”